BJUI. Prognostic role of ECOG performance status in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: an international study

Similar documents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE. World J Urol (2011) 29: DOI /s

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations xx (2010) xxx. Original article

Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Aut ó noma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain,

BJUI. Oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy: results from an international cohort

Predicting Clinical Outcomes After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC)

Accepted for publication 12 August 2009 S.F.S. and G.G. are currently at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, NY, USA

The Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma

Segmental ureterectomy does not compromise the oncologic outcome compared with nephroureterectomy for pure ureter cancer

Impact of renal function on eligibility for chemotherapy and survival in patients who have undergone radical nephro-ureterectomy

Outcomes of Radical Nephroureterectomy: A Series From the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration

Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. 2

Tumor necrosis is a strong predictor for recurrence in patients with pathological T1a renal cell carcinoma

The Characteristics of Recurrent Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy without Bladder Cuff Excision

EUROPEAN UROLOGY 62 (2012)

Should the primary be treated in patients with metastatic disease? Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer

Urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract how does UK practice compare with European guidelines: is there a difference?

Research Article Partial Cystectomy after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Contemporary Experience

Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: oncologic outcome in 271 Chinese patients

Muscle-invasive bladder and urethral cancer recurrence after surgical management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A review of 305 patients

Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes for Open and Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of 1249 Cases

When to Integrate Surgery for Metatstatic Urothelial Cancers

Setting The setting was secondary care. The economic study was carried out in the UK.

Comparison of prognosis between patients with renal cell carcinoma on hemodialysis and those with renal cell carcinoma in the general population

Xiang Hu*, Liang Cao*, Yi Yu. Introduction

symposium article introduction symposium article

The Predictors of Local Recurrence after Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Invasive Bladder Cancer

Preoperative risk factors for extraurothelial recurrence in N0M0 patients with renal pelvic cancer treated by radical nephroureterectomy

Original Article - Urological Oncology

Evaluation of regional lymph node dissection in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial cancer

MUSCLE - INVASIVE AND METASTATIC BLADDER CANCER

MUSCLE-INVASIVE AND METASTATIC BLADDER CANCER

Long-Term Oncologic Outcome after Laparoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Transitional Cell Carcinoma

Peritoneal Involvement in Stage II Colon Cancer

Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Upper Ureter Metastatic to the Thoracic Spine Presenting as a Spinal Cord Compression

PROTOCOL TITLE LYMPHADENECTOMY IN UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA IN THE RENAL PELVIS AND

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with pt0 Bladder Cancer after Radical Cystectomy: A Single-institute Experience

The Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Pulmonary Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (LCNC)

Long term survival study of de-novo metastatic breast cancers with or without primary tumor resection

Lymphadenectomy in RCC: Yes, No, Clinical Trial?

UROTHELIAL CELL CANCER

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Results From the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration

Is There a Need to Further Subclassify pt2 Renal Cell Cancers as Implemented by the Revised 7th TNM Version?

Lymph Node Positive Bladder Cancer Treated With Radical Cystectomy and Lymphadenectomy: Effect of the Level of Node Positivity

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on patients with pathological Stage T3b and/or lymph node metastatic bladder cancer after radical cystectomy

Prognostic Impact of Peripelvic Fat Invasion in pt3 Renal Pelvic Transitional Cell Carcinoma

Radical Cystectomy in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer: Oncological Outcome and Survival Predictors

Debate: Lymphadenectomy is Important in mrcc, CON P. Mulder, M.D., Ph.D. JJ. Patard, MD, Ph.D.

Bone Metastases in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

EUROPEAN UROLOGY 57 (2010)

Role and extension of lymph node dissection in kidney, bladder and prostate cancer. Omar Ghanem (PGY3 ) Moderator: Dr A. Noujem 30 th March 2017

Arieh L. Shalhav Is There a Risk in Robotic Nephroureterectomy?

Androgen Receptor Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A New Actionable Target?

Lymph node ratio as a prognostic factor in stage III colon cancer

7 Academic Department of Urology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hôpitaux de Paris, René Descartes University, Paris,

The Association Between The Prognosis Of Ureteral Cancer And Natural Constriction By The Common Iliac Arteriovenous Crossing

Correspondence should be addressed to Taha Numan Yıkılmaz;

Carcinoma of the Renal Pelvis and Ureter Histopathology

Clinical Study Ureteroscopic Laser Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinomas: Can a Tumour Free Status Be Achieved?

Extranodal Extension Is a Powerful Prognostic Factor in Bladder Cancer Patients with Lymph Node Metastasis

Lymphadenectomy at the Time of Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer

EUROPEAN UROLOGY 56 (2009)

Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Ureter: Prognostic Factors Influencing Progression and Survival

Implications of Progesterone Receptor Status for the Biology and Prognosis of Breast Cancers

Clinical Study Metastasectomy of Pulmonary Metastases from Osteosarcoma: Prognostic Factors and Indication for Repeat Metastasectomy

Patient age and cutaneous malignant melanoma: Elderly patients are likely to have more aggressive histological features and poorer survival

The Depth of Tumor Invasion is Superior to 8 th AJCC/UICC Staging System to Predict Patients Outcome in Radical Cystectomy.

Lung cancer is a major cause of cancer deaths worldwide.

Citation International journal of urology (2. Right which has been published in final f

YASUHIDE KITAGAWA, KOUJI IZUMI, SOTARO MIWA, YOSHIFUMI KADONO, HIROYUKI KONAKA, ATSUSHI MIZOKAMI and MIKIO NAMIKI

Ureteroscopy Is Indicated in every patient with suspected Upper Tract Urothelial Tumor

Correspondence should be addressed to Xuesong Li; and Liqun Zhou;

J Clin Oncol 23: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Prognostic Value of Lymphovascular Invasion in Node-Negative Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Radical Nephroureterectomy

Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma: location as a predictive factor for concomitant bladder carcinoma

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript World J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 February 1.

Is Hepatic Resection Needed in the Patients with Peritoneal Side T2 Gallbladder Cancer?

RAPN. in T1b Renal Masses? A. Mottrie. G. Denaeyer, P. Schatteman, G. Novara

TCC recurrence within the upper tract urothelium following

Impact of Multimodal Treatment on Survival in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

Significance of the lymph nodes in the 7th station in rational dissection for metastasis of distal gastric cancer with different T categories

ENDOSCOPIC URETERECTOMY DURING NEPHROURETERECTOMY FOR UPPER URINARY TRACT TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA

Rare Small Cell Carcinoma in Genitourinary Tract: Experience from E-Da Hospital

In 1989, Deslauriers et al. 1 described intrapulmonary metastasis

Surgical Management of Metastatic and Locally Recurrent Kidney Cancer: Does it Make Sense?

LONG-TERM SURGICAL OUTCOMES OF 1018 PATIENTS WITH EARLY STAGE NSCLC IN ACOSOG Z0030 (ALLIANCE) TRIAL

Clinical significance of immediate urine cytology after transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Ureteral orifice involvement by urothelial carcinoma: long term oncologic and functional outcomes

Could salvage surgery after chemotherapy have clinical impact on cancer survival of patients with

Surgeons Perspective: LN as a Draining Pattern. Jose A. Karam, MD, FACS Associate Professor Department of Urology

Best Papers. F. Fusco

Staging and Grading Last Updated Friday, 14 November 2008

Upper Tract Urothelial Cancers Nephron Sparing Strategies

models; Kaplan meier curves were also extrapolated for each cohort to compare disease specific and overall survival patterns.

Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy in Thai Men with Prostate Cancer

Perigastric lymph node metastases in gastric cancer: comparison of different staging systems

Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Distant Metastasis Following Loco-Regional Recurrence of breast cancer. Cheol Min Kang 2018/04/05

GUIDELINES ON NON-MUSCLE- INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER

After primary tumor treatment, 30% of patients with malignant

Transcription:

BJUI Prognostic role of ECOG performance status in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: an international study Juan Ignacio Martinez-Salamanca, Shahrokh F. Shariat *, Joaquin Carballido Rodriguez, Thomas F. Chromecki *, Vincenzo Ficarra, Hans-Martin Fritsche, Wassim Kassouf, Kazumasa Matsumoto, Lucia Osorio Cabello, Christian Seitz * *, Stefan Tritschler, Thomas J. Walton, Filiberto Zattoni and Giacomo Novara Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, *Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA, University of Padua, Padua, Italy, Caritas St Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, McGill University Health Centre, Montr é al, Quebec, Canada, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan, **General Hospital Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Klinikum Grosshadern, Munich, Germany, and Derby City General Hospital, Derby, UK Accepted for publication 29 April 2011 Study Type Prognosis (inception cohort series) Level of Evidence 2a What s known on the subject? and What does the study add? ECOG Performance Status has gained wide popularity as an integral part of the assessment of patients with upper urinary tract carcinoma. Our findings indicate that ECOG-PS is strongly associated with perioperative and overall survival and should be considered carefully in our decision-making process. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prognostic role of ECOG Performance status (ECOG-PS) in a large multi-institutional international cohort of patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data of 427 patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy at five international institutions in Asia, Europe and Northern America were collected retrospectively from 1987 to 2008. Logistic and Cox regression models were used for univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS ECOG-PS was 0 in 272 of 427 (64%) patients. The median follow-up of the whole cohort was 32 months. The five-year recurrence-free (RFS), cancer-specific (CSS) and overall (OS) survival estimates were 71.7%, 74.9% and 68.5%, respectively, in patients with ECOG-PS 0 compared with 60.1%, 67.8%, and 51.4% respectively, in patients with ECOG-PS 1 (P value 0.08 for RFS, 0.43 for CSS, and < 0.001 for OS, respectively). On multivariable Cox regression analyses, ECOG-PS was not an independent predictor of either RFS (hazard ratio 1.4; P = 0.107) or CSS (hazard ratio 1.2; P = 0.426) but was an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio 1.5; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS In this large multicentre international study, ECOG-PS was not significantly associated with RFS and CSS. Conversely we find a strong association with survival 1-month after surgery and OS. Further research is needed to ascertain the additive prognostic role of ECOG-PS in well-designed prospective multicentre studies. KEYWORDS performance status, ECOG, prognosis, urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinoma, nephroureterectomy, recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific mortality INTRODUCTION Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents approximately 5% of all urothelial tumours and 10% of all renal tumours [1 ]. Standard treatment for high-risk UTUC consists of radical nephrouretectomy (RNU) with ipsilateral bladder cuff excision and regional lymphadenectomy [2 ]. Tumour stage, presence of lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis and grade have been 2011 doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10479.x 1

MARTINEZ-SALAMANCA ET AL. documented as major prognostic factors [2 10 ]. Invasive UTUC has a poor prognosis. The 5-year survival rates for patients with pt2 and pt3 disease are 73% and 40%, respectively; and the median survival for patients with stage T4 disease is estimated at 6 months [11 ]. Surgery represents the only potentially curable therapeutic intervention for these patients. Accurate prediction of survival in patients with UTUC is essential for counselling and for the selection of potential adjuvant treatments. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (ECOG-PS) was established to assess cancer patient s overall well being and functional status [12 ]. Since its inception, ECOG-PS has gained wide popularity and represents an integral part in the assessment of patients with various malignancies such as renal cell carcinoma or bladder cancer. To our knowledge, no studies have assessed the potential value of ECOG-PS status as a prognostic factor in patients with UTUC. We hypothesized that ECOG-PS could be helpful as a prognostic variable to predict perioperative mortality (30 days) and oncological outcomes after surgery. Therefore, we tested this hypothesis in a large multi-institutional international cohort of patients treated with RNU for UTUC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was an institutional review boardapproved study with all participating sites providing the necessary institutional data-sharing agreements before initiation of the study. Five academic centres worldwide provided data. A computerized databank was generated for data transfer. After combining the data sets, reports were generated for each variable to identify data inconsistencies and other data integrity problems. Through regular communication with all sites, resolution of all identified anomalies was achieved before analysis. Before final analysis, the database was frozen, and the final data set was produced for the current analysis. The database comprised 427 patients who underwent RNU with ipsilateral bladder cuff resection between 1987 and 2008. Performance status was assigned according to the ECOG-PS classification: grade 0 for patients fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; grade 1 for patients restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g. light house work, office work; grade 2 for patients ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than 50% of waking hours; grade 3 for patients capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; grade 4 for patients completely disabled, who cannot carry on any self-care and are totally confined to bed or chair [12 ]. Surgery was performed by several surgeons according to the standard criteria for RNU, i.e. extrafascial dissection of the kidney with the entire length of ureter and adjacent segment of the bladder cuff. The hilar and regional lymph nodes adjacent to the ipsilateral great vessel generally were resected along with enlarged lymph nodes if abnormal on preoperative computed tomography scans or palpable intraoperatively. Extended lymphadenectomy was not routinely performed. All surgical specimens were processed according to standard pathological procedures at each institution. Tumours were staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Union Internationale Contre le Cancer TNM classification [13 ]. Tumour grading was assessed according to the 1973 WHO/International Society of Urologic Pathology consensus classification [14 ]. Lymphovascular invasion was defined as the presence of tumour cells within an endothelium-lined space without underlying muscular walls. For the follow-up regimen patients were generally observed every 3 to 4 months for the first year after RNU, every 6 months from the second to the fifth years, and annually thereafter. Follow-up consisted of a history, physical examination, routine blood work and serum chemistry studies, urinary cytology, chest radiography, cystoscopic evaluation of the urinary bladder, and radiographic evaluation of the contralateral upper urinary tract. Elective bone scan, chest computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging were performed when clinically indicated. Disease recurrence was defined as recurrence failure in the operative site, regional lymph nodes, or distant metastasis. Bladder recurrences were not considered in the analysis of recurrence-free survival (RFS). Cause of death was determined by the treating physicians, by chart review corroborated by death certificates, or from death certificates alone. Most patients who were identified as having died of UTUC had progressive, widely disseminated metastases at the time of death. Patients who died in the perioperative period (i.e. death within 30 days of surgery) were censored at time of death for cancer-specific survival (CSS) analyses. Pearson s chi-squared test was used to evaluate the association between categorical variables. Differences in variables with a continuous distribution across dichotomous categories were assessed using the Mann Whitney U test. The Kaplan Meier method was used to calculate survival functions, and differences were assessed with the log-rank statistic. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models addressed time to recurrence and cancerspecific mortality after RNU. Statistical significance in this study was set as P 0.05. All reported P values are two-sided. Analyses were performed with SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS ECOG-PS was 0 in 272 of 427 (64%) patients. Table 1 shows the association between ECOG-PS and clinical and pathological features. Compared with those with ECOG-PS 1, patients with ECOG-PS 0 were significantly younger and more commonly men, more likely to undergo lymph node dissection (all P values <0.05). Moreover, the distribution of tumour grade was significantly different between the two groups ( P < 0.001 ), whereas all the other pathological features were not. The median follow-up of the whole cohort was 32 months, interquartile range (IQR) 13 76 months. At last follow-up, 119 patients (28%) had developed disease recurrence and 95 (22%) were dead of UTUC. Moreover, 55 patients (13%) experienced non cancer-related deaths. The median follow-up for patients alive at last follow-up was 46 months (IQR 16 90 months). The overall 2-year and 5-year RFS estimates were 75.7% ( SE 2.2%) and 67.6% ( SE 2.6%), respectively. The overall 2-year and 5-year CSS estimates were 82.2% ( SE 2%) and 72.5% ( SE 2.6%), respectively. The 5-year RFS and CSS estimates were 71.7% ( SE 3.1%) and 74.9% ( SE 3.1%), respectively, 2 2011

PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF ECOG PERFORMANCE STATUS IN PATIENTS WITH UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA OF THE UPPER URINARY TRACT TABLE 1 Association of ECOG performance status with clinical and pathologic characteristics ECOG performance status 0 1 Cases (%) ( n = 272, 64%) (n = 155, 36%) P value Age (years) (mean ± SD ) 67.3 ± 10.2 64.4 ± 9.8 72.4 ± 8.8 <0.001 Gender Male 318 (75%) 213 (67%) 105 (33%) 0.02 Female 109 (25%) 59 (54%) 50 (46%) Pathological stage Ta 84 (20%) 55 (66%) 29 (34%) 0.102 Tis 7 (2%) 6 (86%) 1 (14%) T1 93 (22%) 51 (55%) 42 (45%) T2 19 (18%) 58 (73%) 21 (27%) T3 128 (30%) 77 (60%) 51 (40%) T4 36 (8%) 25 (70%) 11 (30%) Grade G1 54 (13%) 39 (72%) 15 (28%) <0.001 G2 72 (17%) 22 (31%) 50 (69%) G3 301 (70%) 211 (70%) 90 (30%) Lymphovascular invasion * Absent 301 (73%) 190 (63%) 111 (37%) 1 Present 113 (27%) 72 (64%) 41 (36%) Lymph node removed (median and IQR) 3 (2 6) 3 (2 6) 3 (1 6) 0.745 Lymph node stage N0 124 (29%) 95 (77%) 29 (23%) 0.01 Nx 270 (63%) 155 (57%) 115 (43%) N + 33 (8%) 22 (67%) 11 (33%) Follow-up duration (months) (median and IQR) 32 (13 76) 37 (13 81) 28 (12 62) 0.07 *Missing in 13 cases. in patients with ECOG-PS 0 compared with 60.1% ( SE 4.6%) and 67.8% ( SE 4.7%), respectively, in patients with ECOG-PS 1 ( P = 0.08 for RFS and P = 0.43 for CSS; Fig. 1 ). On multivariable Cox regression analyses that included age, gender, stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion and lymph node status, ECOG-PS was not associated with either RFS (hazard ratio 1.4; P = 0.107; Table 2 ) or CSS (hazard ratio 1.2; P = 0.426; Table 3 ). Analyses were rerun after excluding 46 patients (11%) who received adjuvant chemotherapy. This resulted in consistent statistical patterns and P values. The 2-year and 5-year overall survival (OS) estimates were 77.3% ( SE 2.2%) and 62.3% ( SE 2.8%), respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 68.5% ( SE 3.3%) in patients with ECOG-PS 0, compared with 51.4% ( SE 4.7%) in patients with ECOG-PS 1 (P < 0.001; Fig. 1 ). On multivariable Cox regression analyses ECOG-PS was an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio 1.5; P = 0.03) after adjusting for the effects of other covariates (Table 4 ). DISCUSSION ECOG-PS is intended to assess disease progression, how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the patient, and, whenever possible, to determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. Cancer-related causes for poor performance status may include pain from the primary tumour or metastases, pleural effusions, brain metastasis, ascites, anaemia, cachexia, weight loss, fatigue, gastrointestinal problems or paraneoplastic syndromes. The scale has been largely adopted in oncology, with kidney cancer being the urological disease where it is most commonly used. Previous studies assessed the role of ECOG-PS as a predictor of outcome in patients with UTUC undergoing chemotherapy. Specifically, Ecke et al. [15 ] reported a series of 27 patients with locally advanced UTUC who received adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine, paclitaxel and cisplatin. Median survival time for patients with ECOG-PS 0 vs 1 were 52 vs 22 months suggesting that ECOG-PS is associated with survival in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy [15 ]. In a multicentre, multinational phase III trial including patients with locally advanced or metastatic UTUC comparing two regimens of chemotherapy, von der Maase et al. [16 ] found that PS and presence of visceral metastasis were the most important predictive factors for overall survival and time to progression. To our knowledge, the present series is the first one where the prognostic impact of ECOG-PS status was assessed in patients with UTUC undergoing RNU as a primary treatment. We found that ECOG-PS is associated with greater age and 2011 3

MARTINEZ-SALAMANCA ET AL. female gender and is a strong, independent predictor of overall survival. ECOG-PS was, however, not associated with tumourspecific features such as stage, RFS and CSS. With regard to the cancer-related outcomes, in our series ECOG-PS failed to be associated with both RFS and CSS. This was not in agreement with the fact that ECOG-PS was found to be predictive of survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic UTUC undergoing chemotherapy in previous studies [16 ] where ECOG-PS may play a role as a predictor of response to systemic treatments. The lack of a prognostic role for ECOG-PS in patients undergoing RNU as the primary treatment for UTUC might reflect the prevalent role of clinical and pathological variables including surgical technique [5,17,18 ], stage of the primary tumour [2 ], lymphovascular invasion [19 ], presence of lymph node metastases [8,9 ], tumour location [18 ] and tumour architecture [20 ]. Tumour architecture is an independent predictor of outcomes after nephroureterectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 1363 patients [20,21 ], presence of concomitant carcinoma in situ [22 ]. Concomitant carcinoma in situ is a feature of aggressive disease in patients with organ-confined urothelial carcinoma after RNU or tumour necrosis [23,24 ] in determining outcomes. However, because of study design, it has to be taken into account that patients with poor PS might have not been offered surgery, which may have biased our findings. On the whole, from a clinical perspective, these findings also indicate that patients with poor ECOG-PS may benefit from radical surgery as much as the counterpart with more favourable ECOG-PS and they should be offered RNU whenever possible, despite the higher risk of perioperative mortality. The present study has several limitations. First and foremost are the limitations inherent in retrospective analyses. Although we have performed multiple internal and external reviews of our consortium data set, we excluded patients for whom we could not obtain complete information, which could possibly create selection bias. In addition, the population in this study underwent RNU by multiple surgeons, indication and extension of lymph node dissection were not standardized, and the A Recurrence-free survival probabilities B Cancer-specifie survival probabilities C Overall survival probabilities 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 Follow-up, mo 12 ECOG Performance status 0 ECOG Performance status 1 12 2436 12 2436 12 2436 48 6072 48 6072 84.5 ± 2.3 75.4 ± 2.8 198(39) 132(58) 78.2 ± 3.5 103(31) ECOG PS 1 48 6072 Follow-up, mo 12 ECOG Performance status 0 ECOG Performance status 1 36 60 120 61.3 ± 4.5 55(49) 71.7 ± 3.1 89(64) 60.1 ± 4.6 35(50) 84 96 108 120 132144 Follow-up, mo 88.7 ± 2.0 76.7 ± 2.8 208(28) 138(53) 85.1 ± 2.9 119(22) 84 96 108 120 132144 Follow-up, mo 84 96 108 120 132144 Follow-up, mo Log rank p value 0.08 66.6 ± 3.6 31(49) 60.1 ± 4.6 10(50) 36 60 120 61.8 ± 4.4 61(50) 68.5 ± 3.3 94(66) 51.4 ± 4.7 41(60) 156 168 180192 Follow-up, mo 12 36 60 120 ECOG Performance status 0 89.0 ± 2.0 80.2 ± 2.7 74.9 ± 3.1 68.4 ± 3.8 ECOG Performance status 1 208(27) 139(45) 91(53) 33(59) 90.8 ± 2.4 73.1 ± 4.2 67.8 ± 4.7 67.8 ± 4.7 119(13) 60(32) 41(36) 10(36) 58.1 ± 4.1 33(77) 34.7 ± 6.4 10(68) ECOG PS 0 ECOG PS 1 156 168 180192 156 168 180192 204 216228 Log rank p value 0.43 ECOG PS 0 Log rank p value < 0.001 ECOG PS 0 ECOG PS 1 204 216228 204 216228 240 240 240 FIG. 1. Kaplan Meier curves of ( A ) recurrence-free survival, ( B ) cancerspecific survival, and ( C ) overall survival stratified by ECOG Performance status in 427 patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy and ipsilateral bladder cuff excision for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. 4 2011

PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF ECOG PERFORMANCE STATUS IN PATIENTS WITH UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA OF THE UPPER URINARY TRACT TABLE 2 Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis of ECOG performance status with disease recurrence ( N = 427, 119 recurrences) Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis Parameter HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P Age 1.0 0.9 1.03 0.140 1.0 0.9 1.03 0.317 Gender 1.5 0.9 2.1 0.05 1.2 0.8 1.8 0.339 ECOG Performance status 1.4 0.9 1.9 0.08 1.4 0.9 2.1 0.107 Stage <0.001 <0.001 Ta/Tis 1 Referent 1 Referent T1 1.3 0.6 3.1 0.541 1.1 0.4 2.8 0.824 T2 2.9 1.3 6.4 0.007 2.2 0.9 5.2 0.087 T3 5.1 2.5 10.3 <0.001 2.9 1.3 6.7 0.012 T4 25.7 11.9 55.7 <0.001 10.4 4.0 27.0 <0.001 Grade <0.001 0.141 G1 1 Referent 1 Referent G2 1.9 0.6 6.1 0.253 1.2 0.4 4.3 0.689 G3 5.6 2.0 15.1 0.001 2.2 0.7 6.5 0.160 Lymphovascular invasion 4.0 2.8 5.9 <0.001 1.9 1.3 2.9 0.002 Lymph node status <0.001 0.362 N0 1 Referent 1 Referent Nx 0.7 0.7 1.7 0.707 1.1 0.7 1.7 0.741 N + 5.0 2.9 8.8 <0.001 1.6 0.8 2.9 0.173 ECOG, Eastern oncology Cooperative Group; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. TABLE 3 Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis of ECOG performance status with cancer-specific survival ( N = 427, 95 cancer-related deaths) Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis Parameter HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P Age 1.0 0.9 1.04 0.115 1.0 0.9 1.05 0.08 Gender 1.2 0.7 1.8 0.514 1.0 0.6 1.6 0.963 ECOG Performance status 1.2 0.8.8 0.441 1.2 0.7 2.0 0.426 Stage <0.001 <0.001 Ta/Tis 1 Referent 1 Referent T1 1.4 0.5 4.3 0.541 1.6 0.4 5.7 0.482 T2 3.9 1.4 10.9 0.008 3.8 1.1 12.9 0.032 T3 7.9 3.1 20.0 <0.001 5.7 1.8 18.2 0.003 T4 45.6 17.1 121.7 <0.001 24.5 6.9 86.5 <0.001 Grade <0.001 0.168 G1 1 Referent 1 Referent G2 0.8 0.2 3.3 0.847 0.5 0.1 2.0 0.337 G3 4.6 1.7 12.5 0.003 1.3 0.4 3.9 0.697 Lymphovascular invasion 5.4 3.5 8.3 <0.001 2.5 1.6 4.0 <0.001 Lymph node status <0.001 0.634 N0 1 Referent 1 Referent Nx 1.1 0.7 1.9 0.988 1.2 0.7 2.0 0.524 N + 5.5 2.9 10.3 <0.001 1.4 0.7 2.9 0.347 ECOG, Eastern oncology Cooperative Group; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. follow-up lacked uniformity. However, all surgeons operated at selected centres with significant experience in urothelial cancer management, which might increase the external validity of the data, compared with the single-centre single-surgeon setting. Finally, data on preoperative renal function were not available in most of the patients as well as those patients with poor ECOG-PS who received treatments other than RNU, such as endourological percutaneous or retrograde management. 2011 5

MARTINEZ-SALAMANCA ET AL. TABLE 4 Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis of ECOG performance status with overall survival ( N = 427, 150 any-cause deaths) Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis Parameter HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P Age 1.05 1.03 1.06 <0.001 1.04 1.02 1.06 <0.001 Gender 1.3 0.9 1.8 0.160 0.9 0.7 1.4 0.972 ECOG Performance status 1.8 1.3 1.4 <0.001 1.5 1.1 2.3 0.03 Stage <0.001 <0.001 Ta/Tis 1 Referent 1 Referent T1 1.1 0.6 2.0 0.821 0.8 0.4 1.7 0.576 T2 2.1 1.1 3.8 0.018 1.6 0.8 3.2 0.195 T3 3.5 2.0 5.9 <0.001 2.1 1.1 4.2 0.023 T4 17.4 9.2 32.8 <0.001 8.6 3.9 19.2 <0.001 Grade <0.001 0.167 G1 1 Referent 1 Referent G2 2.1 0.9 4.9 0.086 1.4 0.6 3.7 0.446 G3 3.9 1.8 8.2 0.001 2.0 0.9 4.9 0.108 Lymphovascular invasion 3.6 2.6 5.1 <0.001 2.1 1.4 3.1 <0.001 Lymph node status <0.001 0.173 N0 1 Referent 1 Referent Nx 1.4 0.9 2.0 0.152 1.4 0.9 2.1 0.131 N + 4.7 2.7 8.0 <0.001 1.7 0.9 3.2 0.086 ECOG, Eastern oncology Cooperative Group; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. In this large multicentre international study, ECOG-PS was not significantly associated with cancer-related outcomes (RFS and CSS), but it was a strong predictor of overall mortality. ECOG-PS should be considered in the decision-making regarding RNU for patients with UTUC. Further research is needed to ascertain the additive prognostic role of ECOG-PS in well-designed prospective multicentre studies. CONFLICT OF INTEREST None declared. REFERENCES 1 Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 2 010 ; 60 : 277 300 2 Margulis V, Shariat SF, Matin SF et al. Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: a series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. Cancer 2009 ; 115 : 1224 33 3 Kang CH, Yu TJ, Hsieh HH et al. The development of bladder tumors and contralateral upper urinary tract tumors after primary transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Cancer 2003 ; 98 : 1620 6 4 Langner C, Hutterer G, Chromecki T, Leibl S, Rehak P, Zigeuner R. Tumor necrosis as prognostic indicator in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. J Urol 2006 ; 176 : 910 3 ; discussion 913 4 5 Lughezzani G, Jeldres C, Isbarn H et al. Nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy in the treatment of invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a population based study of 2299 patients. Eur J Cancer 2009 ; 45 : 3291 7 6 Novara G, De Marco V, Gottardo F et al. Independent predictors of cancer-specific survival in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: multi-institutional dataset from 3 European centers. Cancer 2007 ; 110 : 1715 22 7 Rabbani F, Perrotti M, Russo P, Herr HW. Upper-tract tumors after an initial diagnosis of bladder cancer: argument for long-term surveillance. J Clin Oncol 2001 ; 19 : 94 100 8 Roscigno M, Shariat SF, Margulis V et al. Impact of lymph node dissection on cancer specific survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy. J Urol 2009 ; 181 : 2482 9 9 Roscigno M, Shariat SF, Margulis V et al. The extent of lymphadenectomy seems to be associated with better survival in patients with nonmetastatic upper-tract urothelial carcinoma: how many lymph nodes should be removed? Eur Urol 2009 ; 56 : 512 8 10 Zigeuner R, Pummer K. Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: surgical approach and prognostic factors. Eur Urol 2008 ; 53 : 720 31 11 Hall MC, Womack S, Sagalowsky AI, Carmody T, Erickstad MD, Roehrborn CG. Prognostic factors, recurrence, and survival in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a 30-year experience in 252 patients. Urology 1998 ; 52 : 594 601 12 Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982 ; 5 : 649 55 13 Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual, 6th edn. Philadelphia : Springer, 2002 6 2011

PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF ECOG PERFORMANCE STATUS IN PATIENTS WITH UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA OF THE UPPER URINARY TRACT 14 Mostofi FK, Sobin LH, Torloni H. Histological Typing of Urinary Bladder Tumors. Geneva, Switzerland : WHO, 1973 15 Ecke TH, Gerullis H, Bartel P, Koch S, Ruttloff J. Gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and cisplatin as combined adjuvant approach in transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2009 ; 61 : 249 56 16 von der Maase H, Hansen SW, Roberts JT et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2000 ; 18 : 3068 77 17 Capitanio U, Shariat SF, Isbarn H et al. Comparison of oncologic outcomes for open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: a multiinstitutional analysis of 1249 cases. Eur Urol 2009 ; 56 : 1 9 18 Walton TJ, Sherwood BT, Parkinson RJ et al. Comparative outcomes following endoscopic ureteral detachment and formal bladder cuff excision in open nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. J Urol 2009 ; 181 : 532 9 19 Novara G, Matsumoto K, Kassouf W et al. Prognostic role of lymphovascular invasion in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: an international validation study. Eur Urol 2 010 ; 57 : 1064 71 20 Remzi M, Haitel A, Margulis V et al. Tumour architecture is an independent predictor of outcomes after nephroureterectomy: a multiinstitutional analysis of 1363 patients. BJU Int 2009 ; 103 : 307 11 21 Fritsche HM, Novara G, Burger M et al. Macroscopic sessile tumor architecture is a pathologic feature of biologically aggressive upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2010 ; Oct 6 [epub ahead of print ] 22 Wheat JC, Weizer AZ, Wolf JS Jr et al. Concomitant carcinoma in situ is a feature of aggressive disease in patients with organ confined urothelial carcinoma following radical nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol 2010 ; May 5 [epub ahead of print ] 23 Seitz C, Gupta A, Shariat SF et al. Association of tumor necrosis with pathological features and clinical outcome in 754 patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an international validation study. J Urol 2 010 ; 184 : 1895 900 24 Zigeuner R, Shariat SF, Margulis V et al. Tumour necrosis is an indicator of aggressive biology in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Eur Urol 2010 ; 57 : 575 81 Correspondence: Shahrokh F. Shariat, Brady Urologic Health Center, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 525 East 68th Street, Starr 912A, New York, NY 10065, USA. e-mail: sfs2002@med.cornell.edu Abbreviations : UTUC, upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma ; RNU, radical ureterectomy ; ECOG-PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ; RFS, recurrence-free survival ; CSS, cancer-specific survival ; IQR, interquartile range ; OS, overall survival. 2011 7