Cochlea Implant and Hearing Aid

Similar documents
Acoustic and Electric Same Ear Hearing in Patients with a Standard Electrode Array

Fitting of the Hearing System Affects Partial Deafness Cochlear Implant Performance

Beyond the Audiogram:

The Effectiveness of a Middle Ear Implant in Some Cochlear Implant Candidates

Binaural advantages in users of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant devices

Bimodal Devices on Children: A Survey of Clinician Fitting Practices in North America

The Benefits of Bimodal Hearing for Adults and Children: Effect of Frequency Region and Acoustic Bandwidth René H. Gifford, PhD

Comparing Speech Perception Abilities of Children with Cochlear Implants and Digital Hearing Aids

Hearing Preservation and Speech Outcomes in Pediatric Recipients of Cochlear Implants

Cochlear Implants and SSD: Initial Findings With Adults: Implications for Children

Prescribe hearing aids to:

Best Practice Protocols

Marlene Bagatto The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. European Pediatric Amplification Conference Istanbul, Turkey November 15, 2011

Implantable Treatments for Different Types of Hearing Loss. Margaret Dillon, AuD Marcia Adunka, AuD

Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation: Benefits of Bilateral Acoustic Hearing

Effects of Setting Thresholds for the MED- EL Cochlear Implant System in Children

ABC s of Pediatric Audiology

Baker, A., M.Cl.Sc (AUD) Candidate University of Western Ontario: School of Communication Sciences and Disorders

Verification of soft speech amplification in hearing aid fitting: A comparison of methods

Electro-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) Naída CI Q90 EAS System. Naída CI Q90 EAS System Components. Naída CI Q90 Acoustic Earhook

Bimodal listening or bilateral CI: When and why?

Validation Studies. How well does this work??? Speech perception (e.g., Erber & Witt 1977) Early Development... History of the DSL Method

Paediatric Amplification

Nancy Cambron, Au.D. Chair, VHA Cochlear Implant Advisory Board Department of Veterans Affairs VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington

To learn more, visit the website and see the Find Out More section at the end of this booklet.

Feasibility And Satisfaction Of Remote Programming Recipients In Their Homes

The Devil is in the Fitting Details. What they share in common 8/23/2012 NAL NL2

An assessment of the validity of a subjective hearing aid verification procedure

Electric and Acoustic Stimulation in the Same Ear

Kaitlin MacKay M.Cl.Sc. (AUD.) Candidate University of Western Ontario: School of Communication Sciences and Disorders

Analysis of the Audio Home Environment of Children with Normal vs. Impaired Hearing

Outcomes of Paediatric Cochlear implantation in Single-Sided Deafness or very Asymmetrical Hearing Loss (SSD/AHL)

Slide 1 REVISITING CANDIDACY: EXPANDING CRITERIA FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANTS. Slide 2. Slide 3. Cochlear Implant History. Cochlear Implant History

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Academic in Confidence data removed

Evidence based selection of hearing aids and features

Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness in Children and Adolescents

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE GUIDANCE EXECUTIVE (GE) Consideration of consultation responses on review proposal

Self-Assessment of Sound Quality and Hearing Device Satisfaction in Older Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners

Monitoring auditory maturation and adequacy of audio processor programs of pediatric CI users using aided cortical assessment.

Acoustics, signals & systems for audiology. Psychoacoustics of hearing impairment

A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification

ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT HEARING LOSS AND HEARING AIDS. Brenda J. Lowe, AuD Arizona Audiology & Hearing

Best practice protocol

Performance over Time on Adults with Simultaneous Bilateral Cochlear Implants DOI: /jaaa

Psychoacoustical Models WS 2016/17

Ting Zhang, 1 Michael F. Dorman, 2 and Anthony J. Spahr 2

Cochlear Implant Candidacy Programming Protocol, Adult Ear & Hearing Center for Neurosciences

Making connections. Bilateral Cochlear Implant Audit

How is hearing measured?

EUHA Guideline Wireless remote microphone systems configuration, verification and measurement of individual benefit

The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance

LANGUAGE IN INDIA Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow Volume 10 : 9 September 2010 ISSN

Hearing Evaluation: Diagnostic Approach

A comparison of manufacturer-specific prescriptive procedures for infants

Lyric3 Programming Features

Interpreting Speech Results to Optimise Hearing aid Fittings

Synaptopathy Research Uwe Andreas Hermann

Roger for young children. When your child can hear more words, life is on

Cochlear Implants 2016: Advances in Technology, Candidacy and Outcomes

Speech recognition in reverberation in biomodal cochlear implant users

THE EAR Dr. Lily V. Hughes, Audiologist

Presenters: Sheila Moodie, University of Western Ontario; Eileen Rall, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; George Lindley, Oticon Pediatrics;

Introduction. Performance Outcomes for Borderline Cochlear Implant Candidates. Introduction. Introduction. Introduction.

AGE AT IMPLANTATION AND AUDITORY PERFORMANCE OF PRELINGUAL POPULATION. N= 146 Age range: 0-49 y. CC Pearson:

Expanded Cochlear Implant Candidacy Guidelines and Technology Advances

BORDERLINE PATIENTS AND THE BRIDGE BETWEEN HEARING AIDS AND COCHLEAR IMPLANTS

Focus. Children with hearing impairment also benefit from digital hearing instrument technology. Introduction

Audiogram+: GN Resound proprietary fitting rule

Evaluating Speech Perception of the MAXUM Middle Ear Implant Versus Speech Perception Under Inserts

Localization 103: Training BiCROS/CROS Wearers for Left-Right Localization

Cochlear Implant Innovations

Modeling individual loudness perception in cochlear implant recipients with normal contralateral hearing

Electrode Impedance among Children Using the Combi-40+ Medel Cochlear Implant

Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI) Questionnaire for Subjective Sound Quality Detection. For Adults

2/16/2012. Fitting Current Amplification Technology on Infants and Children. Preselection Issues & Procedures

Guidelines for determining hearing aid output, hearing aid features, and fitting parameters for children. Jace Wolfe, PhD

The relationship between electric charge requirements and speech recognition of adult cochlear implant recipients

Technical Topics. Where did my gain go? Thin Tube Open Fit BTE Verification. History of Thin Tubes: Summary of presentation by C. Staples and S.

2/25/2013. Context Effect on Suprasegmental Cues. Supresegmental Cues. Pitch Contour Identification (PCI) Context Effect with Cochlear Implants

Incorporating CAEP Testing in the Pediatric Clinic. Sarah Coulthurst, M.S. Alison J. Nachman, AuD Pediatric Audiologists

FALSE POSITIVE DP GRAMS

09/07/2015. Chear Ltd: independent audiology centre Hyperacusis: Assessment and Management in Children MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTION 1

Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores

DSL v5 in Connexx 7 Mikael Menard, Ph.D., Philippe Lantin Sivantos, 2015.

Hearing the Universal Language: Music and Cochlear Implants

INTRODUCTION TO AUDIOLOGY Hearing Balance Tinnitus - Treatment

Teaching Hearing Loss Prevention to Students and the Community:

Preliminary Results of Adult Patients with Digisonic SP Cohlear Implant System

What Parents Should Know About Hearing Aids: What s Inside, How They Work, & What s Best for Kids

Candidacy and Outcomes for CIs and Hybrids. Holly Teagle, AuD, Associate Professor University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

Jack Noble, PhD, René Gifford, PhD, Benoit Dawant, PhD, and Robert Labadie, MD, PhD

Online Courses for Parents and Professionals Who Want to Know More About Children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

Audiology Japan 61, , 2018 QOL. CROS Contralateral Routing Of Signals. 90dB. Baha Bone anchored hearing aid FDA Baha

Bilateral Cochlear Implant Guidelines Gavin Morrison St Thomas Hearing Implant Centre London, UK

Bilateral cochlear implantation in children identified in newborn hearing screening: Why the rush?

Title: Preliminary speech recognition results after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral hearing loss: a case report

Complete Cochlear Coverage WITH MED-EL S DEEP INSERTION ELECTRODE

Hearing Aids. Bernycia Askew

The Simple Way to Hear More

Transcription:

Cochlea Implant and Hearing Aid Optimizing the fitting of the bimodal situation - A Case Study - Andrea Bohnert K. L. Lippert A. Limberger A. Keilmann Department for ENT, University Hospital Mainz Director: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. W. Mann Division for Communication Disorders Head of Department: Prof. Dr. A. Keilmann Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 1

Studies Morera et al., Acta Oto-Laryng.:2005 Tyler et al., Ear and Hearing: 2002 Ching et al., Ear and Hearing: 2001 Armstrong et al., Am J Otol: 1997 Blamey et al., Cochlear Implants: 1997 Chmiel et al., Ann Oto Rhin Laryng suppl. 1995 Dooley et al., Arch Otolaryngol HNS: 1993 Shallop et al., J Sp Lang Path Aud: 1992 Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 2

Protocol CI optimization HA optimization Speech tests in quiet and in noise Loudness-scaling tests Questionnaires for the child, parents and teacher Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 3

The Method Hearing Aid RECD-Measurement / In-situ-Measurement DSL[i/o]-Method / SPL-O-Gram Loudness-scaling (WHF-System) CI-System Loudness-scaling (WHF-System) Loudness-scaling (WHF-Scale) Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 4

The Method Touchscreen Presentation of Results Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 5

The Method Procedure for CI: WHF with CI only CI-optimization WHF with optimized CI only AIM: WHF-profile with optimized HA only should be similar to profile with optimized CI Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 6

The Method Procedure for HA: Fitting on the basis of DSL[i/o] Verification with SPL-O-gram WHF with HA only Localising deviations in the WHF Checking SPL-O-gram for possibilities of fitting correction due to the WHF results Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 7

The Method Procedure for HA Changing HA parameters in area of deviations Verifying the finetuning with WHF / SPL- O-gram Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 8

A Case Study 12 - year old male Hearing impairment since birth Cause may be hereditary Hearing loss L > R First presentation in clinic at 9 months First HA-fitting (both ears) at 11 months First CI-fitting (left ear) at 7 years HA Phonak Supero 412 CI MED-EL Combi 40+ / Tempo+ Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 9

Audiogram 10002 Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 10

WHF only CI (L) - after optimization 10013 Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 11

Speechaudiogram CI only after optimization / HA + CI before optimization only CI before 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 90% 80% 70% 70% 70% 60% 55dB 65dB 80dB Speech audiogram Göttinger II Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 12

WHF only HA (R) - before optimization 10012 Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 13

SPL-O-Gram HA (R) - before / after optimization Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 14

Changes of Hearing Aid Parameters db 70 60 50 40 30 42 47 51 53 60 61 39 53 20 14 10 0 5 2 1 200 600 2300 4400 Frequency (Hz) before optimizing after optimizing difference Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 15

WHF only HA (R) - after optimization 10014 Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 16

WHF HA + CI - after optimization Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 17

Speech audiogram CI only - after optimization / HA + CI - before optimization HA + CI after optimizaton only CI before after 120 100 80 60 60% 70% 100% 70% 70% 100% 80% 90% 100% 40 20 0 55dB 65dB 80dB Speech audiogram Göttinger II Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 18

Speech audiogram CI only after optimization / HA + CI before optimization HA + CI after optimization only CI before after 70 60 50 40 50% 60% 30 20 10 20% 0 65 db Speech audiogram Göttinger II with competing noise Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 19

Validation assessment of real word outcomes use of questionnaires for the child, parents and teachers Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 20

Validation When using both devices, parents comment he asks for repetition less often he is not so tired after school his concentration is better he picks up the conversation of others his speech is clearer Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 21

Summary Careful optimization of the bimodal situation can improve the outcome of - speech perception in quiet and in noise - functional performance in school - functional performance in everyday life Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 22

Thank You for Your Attention! Clinic for Communication Disorders, University Mainz 23