Public Health Mycobacteriology (TB) Laboratory Testing Services

Similar documents
The ABC s of AFB s Laboratory Testing for Tuberculosis. Gary Budnick Connecticut Department of Public Health Mycobacteriology Laboratory

TB Laboratory for Nurses

Overview of Mycobacterial Culture, Identification, and Drug Susceptibility Testing

Ken Jost, BA, has the following disclosures to make:

TB Intensive San Antonio, Texas November 11 14, 2014

Diagnosis of TB: Laboratory Ken Jost Tuesday April 1, 2014

Stacy White, PhD May 12, TB for Community Providers. Phoenix, Arizona

Frances Morgan, PhD October 21, Comprehensive Care of Patients with Tuberculosis and Their Contacts October 19 22, 2015 Wichita, KS

TB 101 Disease, Clinical Assessment and Lab Testing

Diagnosis of TB: Laboratory Ken Jost Tuesday April 9, 2013

Objectives. TB Laboratory Methods

CDPH - CTCA Joint Guidelines Guideline for Micobacteriology Services In California

Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for the Diagnosis of TB

Receipt within 1 day of specimen collection. Report AFB b smear result within 1 day from receipt of specimen

TB Nurse Case Management. March 7-9, Diagnosis of TB: Ken Jost Wednesday March 7, 2012

TB/HIV 2 sides of the same coin. Dr. Shamma Shetye, MD Microbiology Metropolis Healthcare, Mumbai

Role of the Laboratory in TB Diagnosis and Management

Nucleic Acid Amplification Test for Tuberculosis. Heidi Behm, RN, MPH Acting TB Controller HIV/STD/TB Program Oregon, Department of Health Services

Latent Tuberculosis Infections Controversies in Diagnosis and Management Update 2016

WELCOME. Lab Talk: What a Nurse Hears. April 18, NTNC Annual Meeting Lab Talk: What a Nurse Hears

TB Update: March 2012

Mycobacterial cell wall. Cell Cycle Lengths. Outline of Laboratory Methods. Laboratory Methods

MYCOBACTERIOLOGY INTRODUCTION RANGE OF LABORATORY SERVICES

TB Nurse Case Management Davenport, Iowa September 27 28, 2011

Mycobacterial Infections: What the Primary Provider Should Know about Tuberculosis

WSLH Testing and Surveillance Updates

AFB Identification Texas Approach

Mycobacteria Diagnostic Testing in Manitoba. Dr. Michelle Alfa Medical Director, DSM Clin Micro Discipline

MIC = Many Inherent Challenges Sensititre MIC for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex

MYCOBACTERIOLOGY SERVICE MANUAL

Targeted Testing and the Diagnosis of. Latent Tuberculosis. Infection and Tuberculosis Disease

NAAT in the Clinical Laboratory and Impact on Infection Control 9 th National Conference on Laboratory Aspects of Tuberculosis APHL

Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: Understanding this new diagnostic and who will have access to it

Mycobacteria & Tuberculosis PROF.HANAN HABIB & PROF ALI SOMILY DEPRTMENT OF PATHOLOGY, MICROBIOLOGY UNIT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE

CHAPTER 3: DEFINITION OF TERMS

Rapid Diagnostic Techniques for Identifying Tuberculosis Ken Jost November 13, 2008

Microscopic Morphology in Smears Prepared from MGIT Broth Medium for Rapid Presumptive Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

TB NAAT testing at the Los Angeles County Public Health Laboratory

TB In Detroit 2011* Early TB: Smudge Sign. Who is at risk for exposure to or infection with TB? Who is at risk for TB after exposure or infection?

TB is Local. Barry Chin, Boston Globe, 10/15/2008. * BUT only in appropriate setting

TB BASICS: PRIORITIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS

TB Intensive Tyler, Texas December 2-4, 2008

A Clinician s Guide to the TB Laboratory

Laboratory Diagnosis and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex. Objectives

Making the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis

New Tuberculosis Guidelines. Jason Stout, MD, MHS

Chapter 4 Diagnosis of Tuberculosis Disease

CDC s Approach to Fast Track Laboratory Diagnosis for Persons at Risk of Drug Resistant TB: Molecular Detection of Drug Resistance (MDDR) Service

National TB Services Survey Report

Laboratory Diagnostic Techniques. Hugo Donaldson Consultant Microbiologist Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

Guidelines for Tuberculosis Control in New Zealand 2010 Chapter 11: Mycobacteriology: Laboratory Methods and Standards

CHAPTER:1 TUBERCULOSIS. BY Mrs. K.SHAILAJA., M. PHARM., LECTURER DEPT OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, SRM COLLEGE OF PHARMACY

Frances Jamieson, MD and Kevin May, BSc November 15 th,

Principles of laboratory diagnosis of M. tuberculosis. Anne-Marie Demers, MD, FRCPC 11 September 2017

Characteristics of Mycobacterium

Clinical and Public Health Impact of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) for Tuberculosis

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Department of Microbiology, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Yugoslavia. Clin Microbiol Infect 2002; 8:

Research Methods for TB Diagnostics. Kathy DeRiemer, PhD, MPH University of California, Davis Shanghai, China: May 8, 2012

Diagnosis and Management of Active Tuberculosis

Diagnosis of drug resistant TB

What the Primary Physician Should Know about Tuberculosis. Topics for Discussion. Global Impact of TB

Diagnosis of tuberculosis

General Session IV - Dale Schwab April 20, 2017

TB: Management in an era of multiple drug resistance. Bob Belknap M.D. Denver Public Health November 2012

TUBERCULOSIS. Pathogenesis and Transmission

New Standards for an Old Disease:

Communicable Disease Control Manual Chapter 4: Tuberculosis

How best to structure a laboratory network with new technologies

Diagnosis and Treatment of Tuberculosis, 2011

Diagnosis of Tuberculosis by GeneXpert MTB/RIF Assay Technology: A Short Review

Didactic Series. Latent TB Infection in HIV Infection

Barbara J Seaworth MD Medical Director, Heartland National TB Center Professor, Internal Medicine and Infectious Disease UT Health Northeast

What the Primary Physician Should Know about Tuberculosis. Topics for Discussion. Life Cycle of M. tuberculosis

Research in Tuberculosis: Translation into Practice

Drug susceptibility testing for tuberculosis KRISTEN DICKS, MD, MPH DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

CDC IMMIGRATION REQUIREMENTS:

Technical Bulletin No. 172

TB BASICS: PRIORITIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS

Approaches to LTBI Diagnosis

IDENTIFICATION OF M. tuberculosis

Tuberculosis Tools: A Clinical Update

NOLA TB TIMES. TB Diagnostics A Special Issue. on TB Diagnosis 101. Diagnostic Discrepancy Data. Comprehensive Approach

MYCOBACTERIUM. Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (Mtb) nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) Mycobacterium lepray

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CLINICAL LABORATORY EVALUATION PROGRAM

NTM Plus Case Studies

Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Assessing Your Laboratory

of clinical laboratory diagnosis in Extra-pulmonary Tuberculosis

Mycobacterium Tuberculosis: Assessing Your Laboratory Edition

TB in Corrections Phoenix, Arizona

Case Management of the TB/HIV Infected Patient

The MODS Assay for Detection of TB and TB Drug Resistance: A Multi-center Study

TB Updates for the Physician Rochester, Minnesota June 19, 2009

2008/7/21. An Overview. National Taiwan University College of Medicine 西元前 年. 木乃伊 (Nesperhan, priest of Amun)

INTENSIFIED TB CASE FINDING

The diagnostic value of gyrb RFLP PCR. Mycobacteria in patients with clinical. in Mazandaran

2 ND YEAR RESEARCH ELECTIVE RESIDENT S JOURNAL Volume X, Ellie R. Carmody. A. Background and Study Rationale.

A retrospective evaluation study of diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF assay, used for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Greece

TB Prevention Who and How to Screen

Appendix B. Recommendations for Counting Reported Tuberculosis Cases (Revised July 1997)

Diagnosis and Management of TB Disease Lisa Armitige, MD, PhD September 27, 2011

Transcription:

Public Health Mycobacteriology (TB) Laboratory Testing Services Gary Budnick Supervising Microbiologist Connecticut Department of Public Health Laboratory Branch Hartford, Connecticut

Specimen Collection & Submission Laboratory Facilities & Safety Test Methods and TAT Goals Clinical Specimen-Processing, Smear, Culture Acid-Fast Bacilli (AFB) Identification Methods Drug Susceptibility Testing IGRA s and QuantiFeron Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs)

Clinical Specimen Collection and Submission The accuracy of laboratory testing is directly related to the quality of the specimen Use aseptic technique to collect specimen Clean, sterile, single-use containers Proper technique prevents contamination with environmental AFB & non-afb Avoid swabs Packaging & Shipping Packaging for DOT regulations & safety of carrier & receiver Complete & accurate test requisition Specimen type determines processing method Refrigerate if shipping is delayed (minimize overgrowth) except blood Transport to laboratory ASAP CDC Goal: specimens received at laboratory within 24 hours of collection

Mycobacterial infections can be localized or systemic therefore a variety of samples are appropriate for laboratory analysis The CTDPH TB Laboratory analyzes approximately 3500 clinical specimens annually Pulmonary Sputum, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluids, Bronchial Washings & Brushes Extra-Pulmonary Fluids (Synovial, Pleural, Peritoneal, Paracentesis, Pericardial, Ascites, CAP dialysis, Laryngeal Swabs & Aspirates, Stool, Urine, Tissue, Lymph Nodes, Bone, Biopsies, etc. etc. etc. Blood (whole blood in SPS or Heparin), Bone Marrow, CSF (2-3 ml) Gastric wash/lavage (Na Carbonate to neutralize if <1 hr) Sterile vs. non-sterile specimens processed differently

Biosafety Level = Infectious agent + (lab practices / facilities / safety equipment) BSL-3 Laboratory personnel trained in handling pathogenic and potentially lethal agents Controlled access Special engineering and design features. Unidirectional airflow All procedures involving the manipulation of infectious materials must be conducted within Biological Safety Cabinets (BSCs) Personal Protective Devices: solid-front gowns, gloves, N-95 or HEPA-filtered respirator Laboratory personnel trained in handling pathogenic and potentially lethal agents Annual TST or IGRA

CLASS II Type A Biological Safety Cabinet (BSC) Inward flow to protect personnel High Efficiency Particulate (HEPA)-filtered downward airflow to protect specimens HEPA-filtered exhaust for environmental protection

BSC for Probes and Susceptibility Testing CO 2 Incubators

TAT Standards for the TB Laboratory Clinical specimens reach the laboratory within 24 h of collection Submitter receives AFB smear results within 24 h of receipt of specimen in lab Culture positive 14 days of specimen collection Isolates identified as TB 21 days of specimen collection MTB DST results 28 days of specimen collection NAAT results on ultimately TB culture (+) specimens 48 h of specimen receipt in lab

Processing of Primary Clinical Specimens Digestion & Decontamination Prepare & Stain Smears Inoculate Culture: Lowenstein-Jensen MGIT Broth

Acid-Fast Staining: Clinical Specimens Reporting Method (ATS) Smears Read Daily Auramine-Rhodamine Fluorescent Staining Number of AFB in 1x2 smear Report 0 No AFB found 1-2 in entire smear 3-9 in entire smear 10 in entire smear 1 per 1000 x field Repeat Rare Few Numerous

Acid-Fast Staining: Clinical Specimens Quantitate (+) smear results Other smear reporting schemes (CDC) report 1+, 2+, 3+, 4+. A-R Flourochrome staining method most sensitive. Three AFB per smear (2-cm 2 ) is reportable as positive Zieihl-Neelson, Kinyoun s staining

Why in some cases is the smear positive and culture negative or smear negative/culture positive? The AFB may be present in the specimen but may be non-culturable (non-viable or, dead) or injured due to drug treatment so they may not grow as well) Culture is more sensitive than smear. The sensitivity of the smear ranges from 22-78% (specificity=99.3-99.7%). A positive smear indicates at least 10,000 AFB / ml specimen

Culturing of Primary Clinical Specimens MGIT: Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube LJ slants: 8 weeks @ 36 deg. C. w/co 2 Automated system monitors growth

Culturing Primary Clinical Specimens BactiT/ALERT* SEPTI-CHECK LJ Agar Slant 7H10 Agar Slant BACTEC 460* SEPTI-CHECK Broth *Automated Method

Cultures incubated and read weekly for up to 8 weeks 7H10 & LJ Agar Dubos-Tween Broth Acid-fast microorganisms isolated Cultures proceed to identification methods

AFB Culturing Issues Why do some Mycobacteria cultures take longer to grow than others, even from the same patient? There are currently >120 classified species of mycobacteria. The number of organisms in the specimen (the bacterial burden), the condition of the AFB and the growth conditions will affect the growth rate and culturability. Mixed cultures Generally, most mycobacteria, including TB, are slow growers (14-21 days). Rapid growers (M. fortuitum complex) grow within 7 days; some take >21 days (M. xenopi).

Mycobacteria Identification Methods: Probes Gen-Probe Accuprobe (MTBC, MAC, MGO, MKA) Rapid test: appox. 2 hours to perform Tests for the specific mycobacteria in the culture by looking for its DNA footprint Have to wait for bug to grow Culture need not be pure Cannot be used on clinical specimens Direct probe test: only amount present in culture. MTbc can be speciated by additional testing CTDPH lab tests twice weekly (Tuesday & Friday) and on request

A group of closely related Mycobacteria (16S rdna) M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG, M. africanum, M. canetti, and M. microti M.bovis-animals & human, zoonotic TB, 3 rd world M.bovis BCG-attenuated TB vaccine, bladder cancer therapymay disseminate in immunocompromised (HIV) M.africanum-West Africa, OK if immunocompetent M. canetti-africa, natural reservoir, host range, and mode of transmission unknown M.microti-naturally acquired generalized TB in voles M. tuberculosis most common

Mycobacteria Identification Methods: Probes Can a probe test be negative for MTBC and still contain TB and ultimately be culture positive (i.e false-negative probe result)? Yes. If the number of organisms is below the detectable amount, the test will be negative. Culture must show sufficient growth to be a true-positive The CTDPH laboratory has seen negative MAC probe results with positive HPLC. Why can t Accuprobe testing be done on sputum directly? The test has been FDA-cleared for testing with cultures only.

Mycobacteria have mycolic acids in their cell wall (makes them acid-fast ) Mycobacterium species have unique types and amounts of mycolic acids that can be used to identify them to species level. CTDPH laboratory uses the MIDI Sherlock system HPLC w/analysis software and pattern libraries

MIDI SHERLOCK MYCOBACTERIA ID SYSTEM Distinguishes M. bovis BCG from the TB complex. Rapid extract-to-id in 15 minutes. Easy-to-use automated analysis and naming. Analyze up to 100 samples a day. Mycobacteria are killed during sample preparation. Environmentally-friendly methanol and isopropanol solvents used.

HPLC Chromatograms M. tuberculosis M. szulgai

Goal: Cultures identified within 21 days of specimen collection. Why does are MTBC results reported prior to NTM found in the same culture? Accuprobe results will only identify the target tested for (MTBC, MAC, etc.) whereas subsequent subculture and HPLC will show NTM. NTM usually found in lower numbers esp. if from contamination

Drug Susceptibility Testing BACTEC MGIT 960 Method SIRE & PZA automatically on initial patient & requests Set up ASAP after TB is identified Results phoned/faxed Confirmatory Testing (DST) Goal: MTB DST results 28 days of specimen collection Agar Proportion Method Gold standard Primary drugs when any resistance on BACTEC Secondary Drugs also when Resistant to Rif or any two primary drugs

BACTEC MGIT 960 Primary (First Line) Anti-tuberculous Drugs Rapid Method (4-14 days)

Drug Concentration (ug/ml) Streptomycin 1.0 Isoniazid 0.1 Rifampin 1.0 Ethambutol 5.0 Pyrazinamide 100

Agar Plate Method for primary confirmation and second line antituberculous Drugs Gold Standard method Compare growth on drug and drug-free quadrants Requires 21 days incubation

Agar Plate Method (7H10) Primary and Secondary Drugs Primary Drug Concentration ( g / ml) Secondary Drug Concentration ( g/ml) Isoniazid 0.2 Amikacin 6.0 Isoniazid 1.0 Ciprofloxacin 2.0 Rifampin 1.0 Ethambutol 10 Ethambutol 5.0 Streptomycin 2.0 Streptomycin 2.0 Ethionamide 5.0 Kanamycin 6.0 p-aminosalicylic Acid 2.0 Ofloxacin 1.0 Capreomycin 10 Cycloserine 25

What does it mean when a TB isolate is Resistant to a drug? When >1% of the TB organisms in a population are resistant to a given drug. Clinical success is less likely. What determines the drug concentrations used in DST s? The lowest concentration that inhibits a wild-type strain of Mtb (has never been exposed to the drug), while at the same time does not inhibit strains that have been isolated from patients who are not responding to therapy and are considered resistant. This is the concentration that best discriminates between S and R strains = critical concentration. Critical concentrations are comparable between methods but they may differ among test systems. This causes confusion.

Bacterial population (isolate vs. subculture) Differential growth kinetics Different inoculation methods (size, clumps) Different methods or media Cross-contamination Transcription, labeling errors Human error / lab error The bug - the MIC is close to the critical concentration. Reproducibility poor Beverly Metchock, DrPH, D(ABMM) Mycobacteriology Laboratory Branch CDC DTBE

FDA-Approved Methods QuantiFERON Gold T-SPOT-TB If patient is infected with TB, their white blood cells will release IFN-gamma in response to contact with the TB antigens. More sensitive than TST (particularly in people with HIV and suppressed immune responses) More specific to TB: No FP because of BCG vaccination boosting effect from serial testing TST

QuantiFERON Gold (IT) 3 specialized blood collection tubes Must be incubated within 16 h. of collection. Test results in 2-3 h. Results: (+) = M. tuberculosis infection likely (-) = M. tuberculosis infection NOT likely Indeterminate Each QFT-G result and its interpretation should be considered in conjunction with other epidemiological, historical, physical, and diagnostic findings.

Works by making copies of the TB DNA (if present) and then detecting this DNA footprint Specimen type depends on the method Do not distinguish live or dead AFB TAT 24-48 h Sensitivity: how frequently is NAAT(+) when TB is in the specimen >95% for smear (+) TB patients 55-75% of smear (-) / culture (+) patients Performance improves with increased clinical suspicion of TB

FDA-cleared kits for respiratory specimens Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct (MTD): GEN-PROBE, Inc. Amplicor M.tuberculosis (MTB): Roche Diagnostics Commericial tests are available outside the U.S. Home brew tests Off-label use

FDA-approved for smear (+) & smear (-) Transcription Mediated Amplification Assay time 2.5 to 3 h Not for test of cure or treatment monitoring Sputum, Bronchials, Tracheal aspirates No or <7d drug therapy or none in 12 mo. Approx. $60 / test cost (labor & reagents)

Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests Guidelines Notices to Readers: Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Tuberculosis MMWR Nov 1, 1996/45 (43); 950-952 Notices to Readers: Update Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Tuberculosis MMWR July 7, 2000/49 (26): 593-4 Potential uses of NAATs & interim guidelines Current NAATs (MTD) and FDA-approved uses Off-Label Uses Limitations & Cautions - NAATs do not replace any previously recommended tests (eg. culture). Conclusions: decisions on when and how to use NAA tests for TB diagnosis should be individualized, must be interpreted in clinical context, and may differ for PH and individual clinical decisions

Updated Guidelines for the Use of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis MMWR January 16, 2009/58 (1); 7-10

Perform NAAT on at least one respiratory specimen if: Signs and symptoms of pulmonary TB TB diagnosis is being considered, not yet established Test results would alter case management or TB control activities Standard specimen collection and process for smear & culture, lab creates volume to perform NAAT Perform NAAT on first patient diagnostic specimen Follow manufacturer s instructions Interpret NAAT results in correlation with AFB smear, growth-dependent methods & clinical parameters

Always interpret lab results on the basis of the clinical situation Low Suspicion: two positive results are needed for decision High or Intermediate Suspicion: One positive result needed for decision

First Specimen NAAT(+) / Smear (+) First Specimen NAAT (+) / Smear (-) Clinical judgement on whether to treat pending culture results Test additional specimen(s) to confirm NAAT (+) (Increases PPV) Patient Presumed to have TB No additional NAAT testing needed Begin treatment pending culture results If 2 follow-up specimens NAAT(+): Patient Presumed to have TB Begin treatment pending culture results

First Specimen NAAT (-) / Smear (+) Test For Inhibitors First Specimen NAAT (-) / Smear (-)* Clinical judgment on whether to treat pending culture results Additional spec s can be tested IF NAAT(-) / Smear (-), patient not infectious Inhibitors Detected NAAT no help Clinical judgment on whether to treat pending culture results Additional Spec s can be tested Follow-up specimens NAAT(-) /Smear (+) Inhibitors Not Detected Clinical judgment on whether to treat pending culture results Should test 1-3 addit. specimens *NAAT sensitivity is too low in NAAT (-) / Smear (-) Patients to exclude TB diagnosis Presume Patient infected with NTM

More rapid diagnosis Initiation of earlier treatment Faster Reporting to TB Programs Fewer Transmissions Cost savings for patient isolation No automation ADVANTAGES OF NAATs DISADVANTAGES OF NAATs No self-contained formats Requires technical expertise Meticulously clean lab environment Sensitivity of NAAT cannot be expected to approach that of smear (+)

Gary Budnick CTDPH Laboratory Branch (860) 509-8577 gary.budnick@ct.gov