Clinical trials with JAK inhibitors for essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera

Similar documents
RESPONSE (NCT )

Managing ET in Tiziano Barbui MD

JAK2 Inhibitors for Myeloproliferative Diseases

How I treat high risk myeloproliferative neoplasms. Francesco Passamonti Università dell Insubria Varese - Italy

Stifel Nicolaus 2013 Healthcare Conference. John Scarlett, M.D. Chief Executive Officer September 11, 2013

Novel drugs in MPNs: Histone-Deacetylase Inhibitors

Leukemia. Roland B. Walter, MD PhD MS. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center University of Washington

pan-canadian Oncology Drug Review Final Clinical Guidance Report Ruxolitinib (Jakavi) for Polycythemia Vera March 3, 2016

MPNs: JAK2 inhibitors & beyond. Mohamed Abdelmooti (MD) NCI, Cairo University, Egypt

CLINICAL POLICY DEPARTMENT: Medical Management DOCUMENT NAME: JakafiTM REFERENCE NUMBER: NH.PHAR.98

How to monitor MPN patients

Polycytemia Vera, Essential Thrombocythemia and Myelofibrosis: prognosis and treatment

Sponsor / Company: Sanofi Drug substance(s): SAR302503

Classical Ph-1neg myeloproliferative neoplasms: Ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis. Francesco Passamonti Università degli Studi dell Insubria, Varese

Should Intermediate-I risk PMF be transplanted immediately or later? Position: Later

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of inadequately controlled polycythemia vera without splenomegaly: 80-week follow-up from the RESPONSE-2 trial

Evolving Guidelines of MPNs Where do new options fit in your treatment plan?

Polycythemia Vera: Aligning Real-World Practices With Current Best Practices

Practical Considerations in the Treatment Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Prognostication and Current Treatment Indy Hematology

MALATTIE MIELOPROLIFERATIVE CRONICHE

Update in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Mayo Clinic Treatment Strategy in Essential Thrombocythemia, Polycythemia Vera and Myelofibrosis 2013 Update

Emerging diagnostic and risk stratification criteria

New Perspectives on Polycythemia Vera: Overcoming Challenges in Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, and Disease Management

2013 Congress of the European Hematology Association Abstract 4398

Stifel Healthcare Conference John Scarlett, M.D. Chief Executive Officer November 19, 2014

Leukemia and subsequent solid tumors among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

ASH 2013 Analyst & Investor Event

What is next: Emerging JAK2 inhibitor combination studies. Alessandro M. Vannucchi. Section of Hematology, University of Florence, Italy

Treatment of polycythemia vera with recombinant interferon alpha (rifnα)

JAK inhibitors in Phmyeloproliferative

Il tra'amento delle sindromi mieloprolifera1ve croniche: stato dell arte e scenari futuri A.M. Vannucchi CRIMM, Centro Ricerca e Innovazione delle

JAKAFI (ruxolitinib phosphate) oral tablet

Latest updates in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Elizabeth Hexner, MD, MSTR

Why do patients with polycythemia vera clot? Kinsey McCormick Hematology Fellows conference August 10, 2012

Post-ASH 2015 CML - MPN

How I Treat Myelofibrosis. Adam Mead, MD, PhD University of Oxford Oxford, United Kingdom

Ruxolitinib versus Standard Therapy for the Treatment of Polycythemia Vera

European Focus on Myeloproliferative Diseases and Myelodysplastic Syndromes A critical reappraisal of anagrelide in the management of ET

Presenter Disclosure Information

New Therapies for MPNs

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Myelofibrosis: Evolving Management

By Angela Gascoigne Haematology CNS Chesterfield Royal Hospital

Ruxolitinib for patients with polycythemia vera who have had an inadequate response or are intolerant to hydroxyurea: a critical appraisal

Data have been presented in part at the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology; December 8-11, 2012; Atlanta, GA.

Prognostic models in PV and ET

Chi sono i candidati agli inibitori di JAK2

OMF. Th. Sliwa 5th Med, Department for Hematology, Ocology an Palliative Care Hietzing Hospital, Vienna Austria

Ruben A. Mesa, MD & John Camoranio, MD Mayo Clinic

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) & Myeloproliferative neoplasms

Individualized dosing for Jakafi (ruxolitinib)

Current and future treatment options for polycythemia vera

Hydroxyurea: the comparator in studies with new anti-jak2 inhibitors

Highest rates of thrombosis = age > 70, history of thrombosis, active disease (> 6 phlebotomies/yr) [2]

Disclosures for Ayalew Tefferi

PRECISION: A Canadian In-practice Needs Assessment in Management of PV in Canada* Expert Consensus Recommendations

The Internists Approach to Polycythemia and Implications of Uncontrolled Disease

June Ruxolitinib for the second-line treatment of myelofibrosis (IPSS intermediate LONDON CANCER NEWS DRUGS GROUP RAPID REVIEW

Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA; 14 MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Welcome to Master Class for Oncologists. Session 3: 9:15 AM - 10:00 AM

Molecular aberrations in MPN. and use in the clinic. Timothy Devos MD PhD

Genetic analysis and preclinical modeling of leukemic transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms: Implications for therapeutic strategies

The Ruxo-BEAT Trial in Patie nts With High-risk Polycythe mia Ve ra or High-risk Esse ntial Thrombocythe mia (Ruxo-BEAT)

London Cancer. Myelofibrosis guidelines. August Review August Version v1.0. Page 1 of 12

CLINICAL CASE PRESENTATION

in people with intermediate 2 or high-risk disease, AND if the company provides ruxolitinib with the discount agreed in the patient access scheme.

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera

Published Ahead of Print on October 13, 2009 as /JCO J Clin Oncol by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

MANIFEST Phase 2 Enhancement / Expansion

Evolving Management of Myelofibrosis

Polycythemia Vera and other Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. A.Mousavi

Patterns of hydroxyurea use and clinical outcomes among patients with polycythemia vera in real world clinical practice: a chart review

Highlights in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms From the 2017 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition

Ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in patients with Polycythemia Vera: 80 Week follow up from the RESPONSE trial

Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Polycythemia Vera

Is the recommended hematocrit target in polycythemia vera evidence based? Tiziano BARBUI, MD Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy

3. Pardanani A, et al. Leukemia 2009;23: Hedvat M, et al. Cancer Cell 2009;16:

ASCO 2011: Leukemia. Disclosures

UNDERSTANDING POLYCYTHEMIA VERA (PV) A guide for patients and caregivers

MPN What's new in the morphological classification, grading of fibrosis and the impact of novel drugs

OVERALL CLINICAL BENEFIT

Understanding how Jakafi (ruxolitinib) inhibits* overactive JAK pathway signaling

Management of polycythaemia vera: a critical review of current data

Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thombocythemia A Single Institution Experience

Rischio emorragico e trombotico nella TE e PV

PV and ET in Joyce Niblack Memorial Conference on Myeloproliferative Disease Mayo Clinic. Scottsdale, Arizona February 21-22, 2015

Recognizing and treating the patient with high-risk polycythemia vera. Kim-Hien Dao, DO, PhD Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon

Essential thrombocythemia treatment algorithm 2018

Heme 9 Myeloid neoplasms

Efficacy, safety and survival with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis: results of a median 2-year follow-up of COMFORT-I

Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; MPN-RC (US), 2 H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center (US), 3

ASH 2014 Analyst & Investor Event

Back to the future in MPN. Claire Harrison Guy s and St Thomas Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Preliminary Results From a Phase I Dose Escalation Trial of Ruxolitinib and the PI3Kδ Inhibitor TGR-1202 in Myelofibrosis

Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders

What is New in Leukemia & MPN in 2011?

Practice Patterns in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Polycythemia Vera in the Post JAK2 V617F Discovery Era

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Novità terapeu-che nelle mala3e mieloprolifera-ve croniche Ph nega-ve. Francesco Passamon- Università dell Insubria Varese - Italy

PRM 151 in Myelofibrosis: Durable Efficacy and Safety at 72 Weeks

Transcription:

Clinical trials with JAK inhibitors for essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera Alessandro M. Vannucchi, MD Laboratorio Congiunto MMPC Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine University of Florence, Italy

Disclosures for Alessandro Vannucchi, MD Royalty Receipt of intellectual property/ Patent holder Consulting fee Speakers bureau Fees for non-cme services Contracted research Ownership interest (stocks, stock options) Other N/A N/A N/A N/A Novartis Novartis N/A N/A N/A = Not Applicable (no conflicts listed) Presentation includes discussion of off-label or unapproved use of a drug or medical device

Natural History of Polycythemia Vera (PV) and Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) Diagnosis 10 yr 20 yr Thrombosis Hemorrhage Diagnosis 10 yr 20 yr PPV- or PET- Myelofibrosis Leukemia

Goals of Therapy in Patients with PV and ET To avoid first occurrence and/or recurrence of thrombotic and bleeding complications To minimize the risk of acute leukemia and post-pv or post-et myelofibrosis To control systemic symptoms Barbui T, et al. JCO 2011; 29:761-70

Current ( conventional ) Therapeutic Landscape for PV and ET Treatment is based on the stratification of risk (for thrombosis) Phlebotomy Low-dose aspirin Cytotoxic drugs (hydroxyurea, busulphan) Interferon * * Not approved for these indications

Criteria for Resistance / Intolerance to Hydroxyurea RESISTANCE INTOLERANCE Hydroxyurea (HU) Need of phlebotomy to maintain Hct <45% Platelets (PLT) >400x10 9 /L and WBC >10x10 9 /L Spleen reduction by <50% or No complete relief of spleen-related symptoms ANC <10 9 /L or PLT <100x10 9 /L or Hb <100g/L Leg ulcers or Other unacceptable HU-related toxicities* After 3 months of at least 2 g/day HU At the lowest dose required to achieve complete or partial hematologic response (ELN criteria) At any dose of HU *Mucocutaneous, gastrointestinal, pneumonitis, fever Barosi G, et al. Br J Haematol. 2010;148(6):961-963.

Resistance to Hydroxyurea Adversely Affects Survival and Disease Progression in PV Overall survival Transformation to PPV-MF and AL Copyrighted graph Copyrighted graph Resistance and intolerance to hydroxyurea occurred in 11% and 13% of 261 PV patients Resistance to hydroxyurea implied a 5.6 fold increase in the risk of death and 6.8 fold increase in the risk of transformation PPV-MF, post-pv myelofibrosis; AL, acute leukemia Alvarez-Larrán A, et al. Blood. 2012;119(6):1363-1369.

Possible Different Strategies to Inhibit JAK2 Canonical Non canonical Alternative Inhibitors of the JAK2 tyrosine kinase activity (TKI) Non-TKI that inhibits JAK2 by alternative mechanisms Telomerase inhibitors

The HDAC Inhibitor Givinostat Has Direct Inhibitory Activity on JAK2 V617F Cells GVS is more cytotoxic on JAK2 V617 than JAK2 WT cell lines. Low doses of GVS inhibit proliferation and erythroid differentiation of primary MPN cells. GVS does not affect JAK2 mrna levels but impairs JAK2 half-life. Low doses of GVS impair JAK/STAT signaling by down-regulating JAK2 and p-jak2 levels A pilot study in 13 PV and 1 ET patients has provided evidence of clinical activity (Hct control, reduction of palpable spleen, symptomatic control) with mild GI toxicity. Guerini V, et al. Leukemia. 2008;22(4):740-747. Amaru Calzada A, et al. Exp Hematol. 2012;40(8):634-645. Rambaldi A, et al. Br J Haematol. 2010;150(4):446-455

Synergism of Givinostat with Hydroxyurea Copyrighted material HU synergizes with GVS in reducing proliferation of JAK2 V617F-mutated cell lines Synergism occurs through caspase 3 activation and inhibition of p21cdkn1a induction Amaru Calzada A, et al. Exp Hematol. 2013;41(3):253-260.

Synergism of Givinostat with Hydroxyurea Copyrighted material Copyrighted material HU synergizes with GVS in reducing proliferation of JAK2 V617F-mutated cell lines Synergism occurs through caspase 3 activation and inhibition of p21cdkn1a induction Finazzi G, et al. Br J Haematol. 2013;161(5):688-694. Amaru Calzada A, et al. Exp Hematol. 2013;41(3):253-260.

A Phase II Study of Givinostat in Combination With HU: Response and Safety 50 mg/day 100 mg/day Overall response 11 PR = 50% 1 CR + 9 PR = 45% Hct normalization 28% 42% WBC normalization 25% 36% Platelets normalization 36% 20% Spleen normalization 0% 7% Pruritus > grade 2 normalization 64% 80% AE grade 2 32% 36% Drop out 9% 14% PR, partial response; CR, complete response Finazzi G, et al. Br J Haeatol. 2m013;161(5):688-694.

A Phase II Study of Vorinostat (MK-0683) in Patients With PV and ET Week 24 Week 36 vorinostat 400 mg/day Primary objective: Clinicohematological response per the ELN response criteria at the end of the intervention and observation period Second objective: To investigate whether vorinostat influenced the JAK2 mutant allele burden Andersen CL, et al. Br J Haematol. 2013;162(4):498-508.

A Phase II Study of Vorinostat (MK-0683) in PV and ET: Clinical Responses and Safety 63 patients (PV= 44, ET= 19) were enrolled. 30 In the intervention phase, 33 (52%) discontinued mainly due to AE and SAE. At the end of study, the discontinuation rate was 60%. Main toxicities were mainly non-haematological (fatigue, renal impairment, 25 diarrhoea, hair loss, weight loss, nausea, unspecified pain, headache, and leg ulcers) Efficacy (ITT analysis): End of intervention Responses occurred in 35% of the patients (3 CR, 19 PR) The median decrease of JAK2 V617F allele burden from baseline level was 5.6% End of observation ITT analysis: 9.5% responses (2 in CR, 4 in PR) 33 38 Andersen CL, et al. Br J Haematol. 2013;162(4):498-508.

Dysregulated Telomerase Activity in MPN Upregulated telomerase activity may be involved in proliferation and replication immortality of neoplastic progenitor cells, and has been shown to occur also in MPN cells IMETELSTAT is the first telomerase inhibitor in clinical development Competitively binds to RNA template of telomerase and inhibits is activity IMETELSTAT inhibited growth of spontaneous CFU-MK from ET pts Did not inhibit cytokine-induced CFU-MK growth from healthy controls Ruella M et al, Exp Hematol. 2013 Jul;41(7):627-34; Baerlocher GM, et al. Blood Nov 2012; 120: abstr 179

Hematologic and Molecular Response in ET with Imetelstat JAK2V617F Allele Burden (%) Baerlocher GM, et al. Blood Nov 2012; 120: abstr 179

Studies with JAK2 Inhibitors in PV and ET Drug LY2784544 momelotinib (CYT387) SAR302503/TG101348 INCB018424/Ruxolitinib Diseases and studies PV-ET: phase II completed PV-ET: phase II ongoing PV-ET: phase II STOPPED PV-ET: phase II completed; PV: phase III completed

Phase II Study of Ruxolitinib in Patients With Advanced PV Eligibility criteria: Refractory or intolerant to HU or HU contraindicated Hct >45% or phlebotomy 2 times in last 6 months, with at least one phlebotomy in last 3 months 10 mg BID (n = 7) 25 mg BID (n = 8) 50 mg QD (n = 7) 10 mg BID (n = 12) Part 1 Part 2 Patients received ruxolitinib for a median of 152 weeks (range, 31-177 weeks) Verstovsek S, et al. Cancer. 2014;120(4):513-520.

Phase II Study of Ruxolitinib in Patients With Advanced PV: Main Results Hematocrit <45% without phlebotomy was achieved in 97% of patients by week 24 Among patients with palpable splenomegaly at baseline, 44% and 63%, respectively, achieved nonpalpable spleen at weeks 24 and 144 Verstovsek S, et al. Cancer. 2014;120:513-520.

Pharmacodynamic and Molecular Studies in Ruxolitinib-Treated PV Patients: LAP HV_Max HV_Min LAP= Leukocyte Alkaline Phosphatase Verstovsek S, et al. Cancer. 2014;120:513-520. Passamonti F et al, Blood 2006; 107:3676-82. Falanga A et al, Blood 2000; 96:4

Pharmacodynamic and Molecular Studies in Ruxolitinib-Treated PV Patients: LAP Elevated levels of LAP are correlated with JAK2V617F allele burden. Copyrighted material HV_Max HV_Min LAP= Leukocyte Alkaline Phosphatase In vivo leukocyte activation was associated with laboratory signs of endothelium and coagulation system Verstovsek S, et al. Cancer. 2014;120:513-520. Passamonti F et al, Blood 2006; 107:3676-82. Falanga A et al, Blood 2000; 96:4261-6.

Pharmacodynamic and Molecular Studies in Ruxolitinib-Treated PV Patients: CRP CRP, C-reactive protein Verstovsek S, et al. Cancer. 2014;120(4):513-520. Barbui T et al, Haematologica

Pharmacodynamic and Molecular Studies in Ruxolitinib-Treated PV Patients: CRP Unadjusted and sequentially multivariable adjusted risk of thrombosis associated to different hs-crp CRP, C-reactive protein Verstovsek S, et al. Cancer. 2014;120(4):513-520. Barbui T et al, Haematologica 2011; 96:315-8. Obtained form http://www.haematologica.org

Percent Change From Baseline in JAK2 V617F Allele Burden (mean ± SEM) Pharmacodynamic and Molecular Studies in Ruxolitinib-Treated PV Patients: JAK2V617F 25 0 n=30 n=28 n=23 25 8 14 22 50 48 96 Weeks 144 With longer follow-up (5 yr) some patients may become JAK2 V617F negative However, TET2 mutant ancestral clone remain untouched (Pieri L et al, ASH 2014, Poster # 3185) Verstovsek S, et al. Cancer. 2014;120(4):513-520.

Randomized (1:1) RESPONSE Study Design Resistance to or intolerance of hydroxyurea (modified ELN criteria) Phlebotomy requirement Splenomegaly Pre-randomization (day -28 to day -1) Hct 40%-45% Ruxolitinib 10 mg BID n = 110 BAT n = 112 Week 32 (primary endpoint) Crossover to ruxolitinib Week 48 a Extended Treatment phase Week 80 Week 208 Week 208 Ruxolitinib-randomized patients were individually titrated for efficacy and safety (to a maximum of 25 mg BID) Investigator-selected best available therapy (BAT) as monotherapy (hydroxyurea, IFN/peg-IFN, anagrelide, pipobroman, IMIDs, or observation); BAT could be changed in case of lack of response or BATrelated toxicity requiring drug discontinuation a The primary analysis occurred after all patients completed week 48. Vannucchi A, et al. Haematologica. 2014;99(Suppl): Abstract LB2436.

Patients, % Primary Response Primary endpoint (composite): Percentage of patients who achieved both Hct control (Hct <45% and no phlebotomy) and spleen response (reduction of SV to <35% from baseline assessed by MRI) at week 32. Primary endpoint Individual components of primary endpoint 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 P<.0001 OR, 28.64 (95% CI, 4.50-1206) 21% 38% 1% 1% 1% 60% 20% Primary Composite Endpoint >35% Reduction in in SV SV Hct Control Ruxolitinib BAT 77% of patients randomized to ruxolitinib met at least 1 component of the primary endpoint SV, spleen volume Vannucchi A, et al. Haematologica. 2014;99(Suppl): Abstract LB2436.

Probability Duration of Primary Response Only 1 patient lost primary response 37.1 weeks after start of that response 100 80 60 Ruxolitinib Censoring times 40 20 0 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96 102 108 114 120 Time From Initial Response, weeks At risk 23 23 23 22 22 21 18 15 14 14 14 10 10 10 6 6 4 1 1 0 0 Events 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 The probability of maintaining primary response for 1 year was 94% Vannucchi A, et al. Haematologica. 2014;99(Suppl): Abstract LB2436.

Patients, % Complete Hematologic Remission CHR is defined as Hct control, PLT count 400 10 9 /L, and WBC count 10 10 9 /L 50 40 30 20 10 23.6% P =.0028 a OR, 3.35 (95% CI, 1.43-8.35) 8.9% Ruxolitinib (n = 110) BAT (n = 112) 0 Complete Hematologic Remission at Week 32 88.5% of patients who achieved CHR had a durable response at week 48 a P value, odds ratio and 95% CI were calculated using stratified exact Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test by adjusting for the WBC/PLT status (abnormal vs normal) at baseline. WBC/PLT status was defined as abnormal if WBC count was >15 10 9 /L, and/or PLT count >600 10 9 /L. Vannucchi A, et al. Haematologica. 2014;99(Suppl): Abstract LB2436.

Patients, % Improvement in Symptoms Percentage of patients with a 50% improvement in MPN-SAF symptom score at week 32 a 80 60 40 49 64 37 62 Ruxolitinib BAT 20 0 a In patients with scores at both baseline and week 32 MPN-SAF, Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form 5 11 13 n = 74 81 74 80 71 80 63 71 MPN-SAF Total symptom score Cytokine symptom cluster Tiredness Itching Muscle ache Night sweats Sweating while awake Hyperviscosity symptom cluster Headache Dizziness Skin redness Vision problems Ringing in ears Concentration problems Numbness/tingling in hands/feet Vannucchi A, et al. Haematologica. 2014;99(Suppl): Abstract LB2436. 17 Splenomegaly symptom cluster Fullness/early satiety Abdominal discomfort

Patients, n (%) Other Adverse Events Ruxolitinib (n = 110) BAT (n = 111) Infections All infections 46 (41.8) 41 (36.9) Grade 3 or 4 4 (3.6) 3 (2.7) Herpes zoster Grade 3 or 4 7 (6.4) 0 0 0 Non-melanoma skin cancers a All NMSC 4 (3.6) 2 (1.8) Grade 3 or 4 3 (1.8) 1 (0.9) Progression to MF and AML b MF 2 (1.8) 1 (0.9) AML 1 (0.9) 0 a A higher rate of NMSC was reported in the ruxolitinib arm (4.7 vs 2.7 pts / 100-PY); No patients discontinued treatment for NMSC. A higher proportion of patients in the ruxolitinib arm had a prior history of NMSC or pre-cancerous skin condition compared to the BAT arm (10.9% vs 6.3%) All 4 ruxolitinib patients and 1 of the 2 BAT patients with NMSC had a history of skin cancer or precancer Patients randomized to ruxolitinib had a longer prior exposure to HU (162.9 vs 145.6 weeks). HU exposure was higher in patients who developed secondary malignancies, including NMSCs (461.3 vs 206.9 weeks) b After week 32, there was 1 transformation to MF in the ruxolitinib arm and 2 in the BAT arm (after crossover); there was 1 transformation to AML in the BAT arm (after crossover).

RESPONSE: Additional Findings The rate of thromboembolic events was lower in the ruxolitinib group (1 thrombosis compared with 6 thromboses in the BAT arm) Tolerability: 85% of patients in the ruxolitinib arm were still on treatment at a median follow-up of 81 weeks Most adverse events were grade 1/2, and few patients developed grade 3/4 cytopenias The safety profile of ruxolitinib in this study is generally consistent with that observed in the phase III COMFORT studies 1,2 of ruxolitinib for the treatment of MF Lower rates of cytopenias were observed in this PV population 1. Verstovsek S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):799-807. 2. Harrison CH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):787-798. 1. Verstovsek S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):799-807. 2. 2. Harrison CH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):787-798.

Phase II Study of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Advanced ET Eligibility criteria: ET refractory or intolerant to hydroxyurea or for whom treatment with hydroxyurea was contraindicated, as assessed by the investigator Platelets > 650 x 10 9 /L unless on therapy 10 mg BID (n = 7) 25 mg BID (n = 8) 50 mg QD (n = 7) 25 mg BID (n = 15) Part 1 Part 2 At 192 weeks of follow-up, 57% of patients with platelet count >600x10 9 /L had reduction to <600x10 9 /L Most patients obtained control of leukocytosis, resolution of splenomegaly, and improvement of symptoms Verstovsek S et al, Long-Term Results From a Phase I Open-Label Study of Ruxolitinib in Patients With Essential Thrombocythemia Refractory to or Intolerant of Hydroxyurea. ASH 2014, abstr 1847.

Conclusions Inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway in patients with PV and ET may help control the disease manifestations and, possibly, reduce complications

Conclusions Inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway in patients with PV and ET may help control the disease manifestations and, possibly, reduce complications But will not cure the patient

Conclusions Inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway in patients with PV and ET may help control the disease manifestations and, possibly, reduce complications But will not cure the patient The unwanted inhibition of wild-type JAK2 causing anemia and thrombocytopenia in MF is of minor concern in PV and ET

Conclusions Inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway in patients with PV and ET may help control the disease manifestations and, possibly, reduce complications But will not cure the patient The unwanted inhibition of wild-type JAK2 causing anemia and thrombocytopenia in MF is of minor concern in PV and ET But other toxicities require careful monitoring

Conclusions Inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway in patients with PV and ET may help control the disease manifestations and, possibly, reduce complications But will not cure the patient The unwanted inhibition of wild-type JAK2 causing anemia and thrombocytopenia in MF is of minor concern in PV and ET But other toxicities require careful monitoring There are additional non-canonical and alternative strategies for inhibiting JAK2 mutated cells

Conclusions Inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway in patients with PV and ET may help control the disease manifestations and, possibly, reduce complications But will not cure the patient The unwanted inhibition of wild-type JAK2 causing anemia and thrombocytopenia in MF is of minor concern in PV and ET But other toxicities require careful monitoring There are additional non-canonical and alternative strategies for inhibiting JAK2 mutated cells But their role is still uncertain and toxicities challenging

Final take-home message JAK2 inhibitors may represent a new therapeutic option for selected categories of patients with PV who are not satisfactorily managed with conventional therapies, while there is still too little experience in ET.