Draft Guidance on Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol Xinafoate. Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol Xinafoate. Powder/Inhalation

Similar documents
Year in review. Vit Perlik Director of Regulatory Science and Clinical Development

Biopharmaceutics of Non-Orally Administrated Drugs

Generic Inhaled Medications

Device Design Similarity

Guidance Document. Data Requirements for Safety and Effectiveness of Subsequent Entry Inhaled Corticosteroid Products Used for the Treatment of Asthma

Caption: The equipment required for testing Fluticasone Propionate (FP) Inhalation Powder in line with a new product-specific monograph (USP36-NF31).

Current Challenges and Opportunities in Demonstrating Bioequivalence

Go With the Flow REGULATORY LANDSCAPE. Mark Copley at Copley Scientific

Drug/Device Combination Products: Bioequivalence

Clinical Endpoint Bioequivalence Study Review in ANDA Submissions. Ying Fan, Ph.D.

SYNOPSIS. First subject enrolled 15 August 2003 Therapeutic confirmatory (III) Last subject completed 03 February 2005

Assessing Quality of Inhaled Products And Links to Efficacy and Safety

IPAC-RS/UF Orlando Inhalation Conference March 20, S.T. Horhota 1, C.B. Verkleij 2, P.J.G. Cornelissen 2, L. Bour 3, A. Sharma 3, M.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Co-Primary Outcomes/Efficacy Variables:

Challenges in Meeting International Requirements for Clinical Bioequivalence of Inhaled Drug Products

SYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers).

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Public Assessment Report Scientific discussion. Salmeterol/Fluticasone Sandoz (salmeterol xinafoate, fluticasone propionate) SE/H/1323/03/DC

Bioequivalence of Inhaled Corticosteroids. -with emphasis on Pharmacokinetic Tools.

Inhalation Product Research at FDA

The FDA Critical Path Initiative

Understanding Regulatory Global Requirements for Nasal Drug Products. Julie D. Suman, Ph.D. April 8, 2016

Patient. Device Clinician. Safety & efficacy

Study designs and PD/Clinical endpoints to demonstrate therapeutic equivalence: European Views

SOME STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EQUIVALENCE STUDIES USING PHARMACODYNAMIC AND CLINICAL ENDPOINTS

SYNOPSIS. Drug substance(s) Budesonide/formoterol Document No. Edition No. Study code SD Date 16 December 2004

aclidinium 322 micrograms inhalation powder (Eklira Genuair ) SMC No. (810/12) Almirall S.A.

Type of intervention Treatment. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Utibron Neohaler. (indacaterol, glycopyrrolate) New Product Slideshow

Understanding cascade impaction and its importance for inhaler testing

090177e182b31c5d\0.1\Draft\Versioned On:16-Dec :12

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Individual Study Table Referring to Part of the Dossier. Volume:

Equivalence Evaluation of Valved Holding Chambers (VHCs) with Albuterol Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler (pmdi)

Referring to Part IV of the Dossier

Annex I. Scientific conclusions and grounds for refusal presented by the European Medicines Agency

Qualifying Container Closure Systems for OINDP: Current & Future Regulatory Expectations. Julie D. Suman, Ph.D. November 14, 2014

SYNOPSIS. Co-ordinating investigator Not applicable. Study centre(s) This study was conducted in Japan (57 centres).

Online supplementary material

Considerations for Evaluation of Bioequivalence and Interchangeability of Orally Inhaled Products

Public Assessment Report Scientific discussion. Flumetor (salmeterol xinafoate/fluticasone propionate) SE/H/1068/01-02/DC

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Estimated date of first patient enrolled Q III/IV Estimated date of last patient completed Q3 2015

BUDESONIDE AND FORMOTEROL (SYMBICORT ): Α A REVIEW

Sponsor. Generic drug name. Trial indication(s) Protocol number. Protocol title. Clinical trial phase. Study Start/End Dates.

EPAG Sponsored Workshop on Abbreviated Impactor Measurement (AIM) and Efficient Data Analysis (EDA) Concepts in Inhaler Testing. Overview of AIM EDA

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

A COPD medication delivery device option: an overview of the NEOHALER

Study No.: SAM40012 Title: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group comparison of three treatments : 1)

Decramer 2014 a &b [21]

Principal Investigator. Study center(s) This was a single-center study. Publications None at the time of writing this report.

SYNOPSIS. Date 15 June 2004

The clinical effectiveness and costeffectiveness. treatment of chronic asthma in children under the age of 12 years

Demonstrating Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Orally Inhaled Drug Products

Study No.: SFCA3007 Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the DISKUS

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

21/03/2011 AEROSOL DEPOSITION AND THE ASSESSMENT OF PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY. Fundamentals of aerosols

Public Assessment Report Scientific discussion. Salflumix Easyhaler (fluticasone propionate, salmeterol xinafoate) SE/H/1692/01-02/DC

Public Assessment Report Scientific discussion. Orest Easyhaler (budesonide, formoterol fumarate dihydrate) SE/H/1214/02-03/DC

What Do Cascade Impaction Measurements Tell Us: In Vitro Aspects. Context of Presentation

Testing Inhaled Generics

Public Assessment Report Scientific discussion SE/H/1689/01/DC

PATIENT INFORMATION. ADVAIR DISKUS [AD vair DISK us] (fluticasone propionate and salmeterol inhalation powder) for oral inhalation

Summary of the risk management plan (RMP) for Duaklir Genuair (aclidinium / formoterol fumarate dihydrate)

SYNOPSIS A two-stage randomized, open-label, parallel group, phase III, multicenter, 7-month study to assess the efficacy and safety of SYMBICORT

Considerations in establishing bioequivalence of inhaled compounds

BEDFORDSHIRE AND LUTON JOINT PRESCRIBING COMMITTEE

Adapting Pharmacopeial Testing for Pharmaceutical Equivalence Studies. Julie D. Suman, Ph.D. March 29, 2016

Public Assessment Report. Scientific discussion. AirFluSal Aerosol 25/125 and 25/250 micrograms pressurised inhalation, suspension

Asthma in Pregnancy. Asthma. Chronic Airway Inflammation. Objective Measures of Airflow. Peak exp. flow rate (PEFR)

A Real Case Comparison of Average and Population Bioequivalence for Evaluation of APSD data

Misty Max 10 nebulizer

COPD. Breathing Made Easier

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome:

Assessing the role of breathing simulators in OIP testing

Nonclinical Safety Evaluation of Inhalation Drug Products

Dry Powder Inhaler. Developing an Efficient. 3M Conix DPI. White Paper / Spring Proven Solutions that Enable Your Success

COMMITTEE ON MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) DRAFT

Supplementary appendix

glycopyrronium 44 micrograms hard capsules of inhalation powder (Seebri Breezhaler ) SMC No. (829/12) Novartis Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

rj.;!i U.S. FOOD & DRUG - ADMIN ISTRATION

Ivax Pharmaceuticals UK Sponsor Submission to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) GUIDELINE ON THE PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY OF INHALATION AND NASAL PRODUCTS

Disclosure. Case. Objectives. Case Continued. Inhalers. Asthma: A GINA Update to the NAEPP 2007 Guidelines 1/20/2015

Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Drug Monograph. Brand Name: Arcapta Neohaler. Generic Name: Indacaterol. Manufacturer¹,²: Novartis

Supplementary materials

Inhaled Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Chronic Asthma in Adults & Adolescents aged 12 years & over

CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF IN VITRO PARTICLE SIZING DATA. Steve Newman, PhD Nottingham, UK November 2006

NEW ZEALAND DATA SHEET SEREVENT Accuhaler

Lead team presentation: Roflumilast for treating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [ID984]

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

AEROSOL THERAPY: THE PRACTICALITIES

SUMMARY THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

Dual-controller therapy, or combinations REVIEW DUAL-CONTROLLER REGIMENS I: DATA FROM RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS.

Blood Eosinophils and Response to Maintenance COPD Treatment: Data from the FLAME Trial. Online Data Supplement

Applicant (Invented) Name Strength Pharmaceutical form. Eformax 12 µg. Σĸóvη για εισπνοή. Eformax 12 mcg. Prášek k inhalaci.

Transcription:

Reprinted from FDA s website by EAS Consulting Group, LLC Contains Nonbinding Recommendations Draft Guidance on Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol Xinafoate This draft guidance, once finalized, will represent the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. If you want to discuss an alternative approach, contact the Office of Generic Drugs. Active ingredient: Form/Route: Recommended studies: Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol Xinafoate Powder/Inhalation In Vitro and In Vivo Studies The following in vitro and in vivo studies are recommended to establish bioequivalence (BE) of the test (T) and reference (R) dry powder inhalers (DPIs) containing fluticasone propionate and salmeterol xinafoate. In Vitro Studies The following in vitro studies are recommended to be conducted for all strengths of the T and R products. For each strength, these in vitro studies should be conducted using at least three batches each of T and R products with no fewer than 10 units from each batch. 1. Type of study: Single actuation content (SAC) Design: The SAC test should be performed at the beginning (B), middle (M), and end (E) lifestages 1 of the product using flow rates of 30 L/min, 60 L/min and 90 L/min. The USP <601> Apparatus B or another appropriate apparatus may be used to determine the SAC using a validated assay. The number of actuations per determination should be one. The volume of air drawn through the delivery system should be 2 L. Equivalence based on: Population bioequivalence (PBE) analysis of SAC. Please refer to the draft Budesonide Inhalation Suspension BE Guidance for additional information regarding PBE. 2 2. Type of study: Aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) Design: The APSD test should be performed at the B and E lifestages of the product using flow rates of 28.3 L/min or 30 L/min, 60 L/min and 90 L/min. The USP <601> Apparatus 3, Apparatus 5, or another appropriate method may be used to determine APSD using a validated assay. The APSD determination of each unit should be performed with a minimum number of inhalations justified by the sensitivity of the validated assay. The volume of air drawn through the delivery system should be 4 L. 1 Based on the labeled number of actuations, the terms, B lifestage, M lifestage, and E lifestage represent the first actuation(s), the actuation(s) corresponding to 50 percent of the labeled number of actuations, and the actuation(s) corresponding to the labeled number of actuations, respectively. 2 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm319977.pdf Recommended Sep 2013 1 EAS Consulting Group, LLC 1700 Diagonal Road, Suite 750, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 (877) 327-9808 Toll Free (571) 447-5500 Local (703) 548-3270 Fax

Additional comments: Drug deposition on individual sites, including the mouthpiece adapter, the induction port, the pre-separator, and each stage of the cascade impactor (CI) and the filter, is requested. Mass balance accountability should be reported based on the sum of all deposition sites. For electronic submission of the individual CI data for the T and R products, please provide a table using the format in the appendix, and send them as part of the abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) submission for BE evaluation. Equivalence based on: PBE analysis of impactor-sized mass (ISM). 3 The CI profiles representing drug deposition on the individual stages of the CI along with the mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD), geometric standard deviation (GSD) and fine particle mass (FPM) should be submitted as supportive evidence for equivalent APSD. Pharmacokinetic (PK) BE Study The following PK BE study is recommended to be conducted for all strengths of the T and R products. 3. Type of Study: Fasting Design: Single-dose, two-way crossover Dose: Minimum number of inhalations that is sufficient to characterize a PK profile by using a sensitive analytical method. Subjects: Normal healthy males and non-pregnant females, general population. Additional comments: Subjects should adhere to labeling as follows: Rinse your mouth with water after breathing in the medicine. Spit the water out. Do not swallow. Analyte(s) to measure (in appropriate biological fluid): Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol in plasma Equivalence based on: AUC and C max for fluticasone propionate and salmeterol. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean T/R ratios of AUC and C max should fall within the limits of 80.00 125.00%. Clinical Endpoint Study The following BE study with a clinical endpoint is recommended to be conducted for the lowest strength of the T and R products. 4. Type of Study: Clinical endpoint study 3 ISM is defined as a sum of the drug mass on all stages of the CI plus the terminal filter, but excluding the top CI stage because of its lack of a specified upper cutoff size limit. Recommended Sep 2013 2

Design: A randomized, multiple-dose, placebo-controlled, parallel group design consisting of a 2 week run-in period followed by a 4-week treatment period of the placebo, T or R product Strength: 100/50 (fluticasone propionate 100 mcg and salmeterol 50 mcg powder for inhalation) Dose: 100/50, twice daily Subjects: Males and non-pregnant females with asthma Additional comments: Inclusion criteria should, at minimum, include: a. Male or female subjects ( 12 years of age) of non-child bearing potential or of child bearing potential committing to consistent and correct use of an acceptable method of birth control. a. Diagnosed with asthma as defined by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) 4 at least 12 weeks prior to screening. b. Pre-bronchodilator FEV 1 of 40% and 85% of the predicted value during the screening visit and on the first day of treatment. c. Currently non-smoking; had not used tobacco products (i.e., cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco) within the past year, and had 10 pack-years of historical use. d. 15% reversibility of FEV 1 within 30 minutes following 360 mcg of albuterol inhalation (pmdi). e. Able to discontinue their asthma medications (inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β agonists) during the run-in period and for remainder of the study. f. Able to replace current short-acting β agonists (SABAs) with salbutamol/albuterol inhaler for use as needed for the duration of the study (subjects should be able to withhold all inhaled SABAs for at least 6 hours prior to lung function assessments on study visits). g. Able to continue the following medications without a significant adjustment of dosage, formulation, dosing interval for the duration of the study, and judged able by the investigator to withhold them for the specified minimum time intervals prior to each clinic visit: short-acting forms of theophylline 12 hours twice-a-day controlled-release forms of theophylline 24 hours once-a-day controlled-release forms of theophylline 36 hours h. Able to discontinue the following medications for the specified minimum time intervals prior to the run-in period and for the remainder of the study, if the study is conducted in the US: oral corticosteroids 1 month parenteral corticosteroids 1 month oral short-acting β-agonists 12 hours i. Willingness to give their (and in the case of a minor their parent/guardian was able to give) written informed consent to participate in the study. 4 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma: Expert Panel Report 3. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program; National Institute of Health; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. 2007, Publication No. 07-4051. Recommended Sep 2013 3

Exclusion criteria should, at minimum, include: a. Life-threatening asthma, defined as a history of asthma episode(s) requiring intubation, and/or associated with hypercapnoea; respiratory arrest or hypoxic seizures, asthma related syncopal episode(s), or hospitalizations within the past year or during the run-in period. b. Evidence or history of clinically significant disease or abnormality including congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, or cardiac dysrhythmia. In addition, historical or current evidence of significant hematologic, hepatic neurologic, psychiatric, renal, or other diseases that in the opinion of the investigator, would put the patient at risk through study participation, or would affect the study analyses if the disease exacerbated during the study. c. Hypersensitivity to any sympathomimetic drug (e.g., salmeterol or albuterol) or any inhaled, intranasal, or systemic corticosteroid therapy. d. Medication(s) with the potential to affect the course of asthma or to interact with sympathomimetic amines, e.g.: β-blockers oral decongestants benzodiazepines digitalis phenothiazines polycyclic antidepressants Monoamine oxidase inhibitors e. Viral or bacterial, upper or lower respiratory tract infection or sinus or middle ear infection within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit or during the run-in period. f. Factors (e.g., infirmity, disability or geographic location) that the investigator felt would likely limit the patient's compliance with the study protocol or scheduled clinic visits. The study is recommended to begin with a placebo run-in period (at least 2 weeks in duration) to wash out any pre-study corticosteroids/ long acting bronchodilators and to establish FEV 1 baseline values. The study protocol should provide a definition of compliant subjects (e.g., used at least 75% and no more than 125% of study drug doses) and specify how compliance will be verified (e.g., by the use of subject diaries). To ensure adequate study sensitivity, the T and R products should both be statistically superior to placebo (p<0.05) with regard to the BE study primary endpoints. It is the sponsor s responsibility to enroll a sufficient number of subjects for the study to demonstrate BE of the T to the R product. The start and stop date of concomitant medication use during the study should be provided in the data set in addition to the reason for the medication use. The sponsor should clearly explain whether the medication was used prior to baseline visit, during the study, or both. Recommended Sep 2013 4

All adverse events (AEs) should be reported, whether or not they are considered to be related to the treatment. The report of AEs should include date of onset, description of the AE, severity, relation to study medication, action taken, outcome and date of resolution. This information is needed to determine if the incidence and severity of adverse reactions is different between the T and R products. BE study endpoints: (i) Area under the serial FEV 1 -time curve calculated from time zero to 12 hours (AUC 0-12h ) on the first day of the treatment, and (ii) FEV 1 measured in the morning prior to the dosing of inhaled medications on the last day of a 4-week treatment. The above two primary endpoints should be baseline adjusted (change from baseline). A FEV 1 baseline is defined as the average of pre-dose FEV 1 values of at least two time points measured in the morning of the first day of a 4 week treatment period. Sampling is recommended to correspond to the same time of day as used on the last day of a 4-week treatment. On the first day of the treatment, FEV 1 should be determined at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 hour post-dose. Equivalence based on: T/R ratio for the primary endpoints. The 90% CIs for the T/R ratios for the primary endpoints should fall within the limits of 80.00-125.00%. Additional information Formulation The T product is recommended to be qualitatively (Q 1 ) 5 and quantitatively (Q 2 ) 6 the same as the R product. If a sponsor uses a Q 2 -different formulation for its T product, the sponsor should explain the reason(s) for not using a T formulation that is Q 2 the same as the R formulation. In addition, the sponsor should provide pharmaceutical development data, involving in vitro testing of multiple drug-to-excipient ratios that encompass combinations below and above the ratios used in the T and R products. Device A sponsor is encouraged to submit a working model and engineering drawings of the product to the Office of Generic Drugs (OGD) prior to the abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) submission, in order to ensure eligibility of the T device under a 505(j) pathway. 5 Q 1 (qualitative sameness) means that the test product uses the same inactive ingredient(s) as the reference product. 6 Q 2 (quantitative sameness) means that concentrations of the inactive ingredient(s) used in the test product are within ±5% of those used in the reference product. Recommended Sep 2013 5

The T product should have the following characteristics: Passive (breath-actuated) device Pre-metered multi-dose format 60 doses External operating procedures consisting of (1) Open, (2) Click, (3) Inhale, and (4) Close Similar size and shape to the R product Comparable device resistance to the R product Dose counter In addition, the robustness of the T product should be demonstrated. Recommended Sep 2013 6

APPENDIX Variable Name Variable Type Content Notes Product Name Character TEST or REF Identifier for product LOT Number Alphanumeric/Numeric Alphanumeric/Numeric Identifier for product lot UNIT Number Numeric Numeric values Identifier for unit must be unique for each product (e.g. #1-30 for test and #31-60 for ref). Stage 1 Numeric Numeric Values S1 Stage 2 Numeric Numeric Values S2 Stage 3 Numeric Numeric Values S3 Stage 4 Numeric Numeric Values S4 Stage 5 Numeric Numeric Values S5 Stage 6 Numeric Numeric Values S6 Stage 7 Numeric Numeric Values S7 Stage 8 or Filter Numeric Numeric Values S8 ISM Numeric Numeric Values ISM MMAD Numeric Numeric Values MMAD GSD Numeric Numeric Values GSD FPM Numeric Numeric Values FRM Example PRODUCT LOT Unit S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 or Filter TEST 1234 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ISM MMAD GSD FPM Recommended Sep 2013 7