Determining Impact of Third Generation Codling Moth, and Emergence Pattern of Overwintered Moths

Similar documents
Predicting Pest Activity with Degree-Day Models

Cydia pomonella. Do You Know? Hosts. Orchard IPM Series HG/Orchard/08 Codling Moth. by Diane G. Alston and Michael E. Reding Adult Codling Moth

Arkansas Fruit and Nut News Volume 5, Issue 6, 13 July 2015

PHEROMONE-BASED CODLING MOTH AND NAVEL ORANGEWORM MANAGEMENT IN WALNUTS

CODLING MOTH CONTROL THROUGH MATING DISRUPTION

USING AEROSOL PHEROMONE PUFFERS FOR AREA-WIDE SUPPRESSION OF CODLING MOTH IN WALNUTS: YEAR SIX

Codling moth (CM) is becoming an increasing problem

USING AEROSOL PHEROMONE PUFFERS FOR AREA-WIDE SUPPRESSION OF CODLING MOTH IN WALNUTS: YEAR FOUR

Improving codling moth spray timing. Adrian Harris. Philip Brain (Biometrician)

PLUM CURCULIO: MANAGEMENT ASSUMPTIONS

Fruit & Nut Notes Serving Solano & Yolo Counties! June Issue 5

The Benefits of Insecticide Use: Walnuts

USING AEROSOL PHEROMONE PUFFERS FOR AREA-WIDE SUPPRESSION AND SPRAYABLE PHEROMONE IN MANAGEMENT OF CODLING MOTH IN WALNUTS

R. A. Van Steenwyk,L. W. Barclay, W. W. Barnett, P. S. McNally, W. H. Olson, W. R. Schreader, G. S. Sibbett and C. V. Weakley

Foothill Farm and Orchard News Issue #2 October, 2001

Tree Fruit IPM Advisory: June 20 th, 2006

Why aren t more growers using codling moth mating disruption?

Making codling moth mating disruption work in Michigan: Adopting an area-wide approach to managing codling moth in Michigan apple production

B. Required Codling Moth Damage Pre-Packing Fruit Evaluation: On-Tree Sequential Field Sampling Protocol:

Annual report Dr Michelle Fountain Adrian Harris

Project Title: Monitoring leafrollers and codling moth with one non-pheromone lure. PI: Alan Knight Co-PI: Jay Brunner

TOXICITY OF INSECTICIDES ON TRIOXYS PALLIDUS, THE WALNUT APHID AND THE CODLING MOTH. Mary Purcell and Jeffrey Granett

Late Broods of The C'odling Moth

I N S E C T S FIRST FLIGHT IN THIS ISSUE... F R U I T J O U R N A L May 7, 2012 VOLUME 21, No. 9 Geneva, NY

Pheromone Based Mating Disruption

SACRAMENTO VALLEY WALNUT NEWS

INVESTIGATIONS ON NAVEL ORANGEWORM CONTROL IN WALNUTS

How to keep apple fruit worm-free Celeste Welty, Extension Entomologist, Ohio State University January 2009

Seasonal Population Trends of Avocado Worm Pests

CHEMICAL CONTROL OF WALNUT HUSK FLY

Control of Codling Moth and Other Pear Arthropods with Novaluron Evaluation of Novaluron for Phytotoxicity to Pear and Apple 2004

MOTH. Codling. Codling moth (CM) is the "key" pest. THE increase in codling moth (CM) problems on a regional scale may be.

scaffolds I N S E C T S MAY DAY IN THIS ISSUE... Update on Pest Management and Crop Development ORCHARD RADAR DIGEST

DESCRIPTION: Control of Codling Moth in Organic Pear Orchards. PROJECT LEADER: Rachel Elkins, UCCE Lake County

Prof. Jerry Cross. Paul Bennett, Colin Corfield

Hervé Quénin, Pierre Laur Calliope SAS Arysta Lifescience Corporation

WALNUT BLIGHT CONTROL INVESTIGATIONS TEHAMA 2008

Integrated Pest Management for Home Gardeners and Landscape Professionals. Figure 1. Adult codling moth.

Apple Pest Management in the West: Strategies to Deal with Inevitable Change

CONTROL OF GYPSY MOTHS

Volume 21, Number 10. June 4, Contents. Current degree day accumulations. Upcoming pest events. Current degree day accumulations

[fll ~ft:

Advanced IPM for UT Tree Fruit

Navel Orangeworm Control: Looking Back, Looking Forward. David Doll UCCE Merced County

TF223. Dr Robert Saville East Malling Research

Management of Selected Pests in Walnuts

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

EVALUATION OF NEW AND EXISTING INSECTICIDES FOR THE CONTROL OF WALNUT HUSK FLY 2012

Tree Fruit Pest Advisory

Reduced rates of pheromone applications for control of codling moth (Cydia pomonella) in pear and walnut orchards

FOOTHILL FARM AND ORCHARD NEWS

A Study of Codling Moth.Abundance As Influenced by Crop Failures

SCAFFOLDS Fruit Journal, Geneva, NY Volume 20, No. 16 Update on Pest Management and Crop Development July 5, 2011

Larval survival and development of the peach fruit moth, Carposina sasakii (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae), in picked and unpicked apple fruits

D. Flaherty, S. Sibbett, K. Kelley, J. Dibble, and R. Rice

Mating disruption to control codling moth and torticid moths TF223 (Project lead, Rob Saville)

ONGOING PROJECT REPORT YEAR 1/3 WTFRC Project # CH

Comparison of two models used for forecasting of codling moth (Cydia pomonella) in Norway. Andreas Skoge Strandtun

Using pear ester to monitor codling moth in sex pheromone treated orchards

Keywords: Plum moth, mating disruption, Isomate OFM Rosso, entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN)

Introduction to a forecasting and decision support system in tree fruit: The Swiss system SOPRA

Tree Fruit Pest Advisory

I. Optimizing Pheromone Release Rates of Aerosol Emitters to Manage Codling Moth in Walnuts

Biological Control of Two Avocado Pests Amorbia cuneana and omnivorous looper on avocado can be controlled by parasite

NAVEL ORANGEWORM IN SOUTHERN CENTRAL VALLEY WALNUTS: SOURCE, SEASONAL ABUNDANCE, AND IMPACT OF MATING DISRUPTION

Healthy Fruit, Vol. 24, No. 16, July 12, 2016

Mimosa Webworm in Honeylocust:

MATERIALS AND METHODS

AP113 Developing an eradication strategy for codling moth. Bill Woods Agriculture Western Australia

BIOLOGY AND CONTROL OF THE CODLING MOTH IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST. K. Diane Dolstad. B.Sc., Washington State University, 1978

The (COSHH) Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations may apply to the use of this product at work.

Gypsy Moth Background Information

New Insecticide Options for Integrated Pest Management: Keith Granger, Jay Brunner, John Dunley and Mike Doerr

Field Identification Guide

Cotton Insect Control in Arizona

Enhancing Biological Control to Stabilize Western Orchard IPM Systems

scaffolds I N S E C T S FLIGHT PLAN IN THIS ISSUE... F R U I T J O U R N A L Update on Pest Management and Crop Development

NONCHEMICALPOSTHARVEST TREATMENTS/TECHNIQUES FOR CODLING MOTH ON INSHELL WALNUTS: DISRUPTION OF MATING AND MONITORING OF ACTIVITY USING SEX PHEROMONE

Monitoring, Modeling and Managing the Lepidopteran Complex in Apple: How Complex Is It?

HULL SPLIT STRATEGIES

DEVELOPMENT AND OPTIMIZATION OF MESO-PHEROMONE EMITTERS FOR CODLING MOTH MANAGEMENT IN WALNUTS AND PEARS

Ambrosia Beetle Decline of Apricot and Plum in Michigan. Bill Shane

SYSTEMS APPROACH WORK PLAN FOR THE EXPORTATION OF APPLES FROM THE UNITED STATES INTO TAIWAN

AUGMENTATION IN ORCHARDS: IMPROVING THE EFFICACY OF TRICHOGRAMMA INUNDATION

Shin-Etsu products: technical aspects Mating disruption control strategy in Italy

Stingless bees behavior : what we know and don t. Mohd Fahimee J, Idris A.G, Rosliza J., Muhammad Radzali M., Roziah G., Mohd Masri S, Mohd Yusri Z.

Pest forecasting models in Emilia- Romagna region

Healthy Fruit, Vol. 25, No. 8, May 23, 2017

Contract Administrator : Carolyn Yager,

INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE MONITORING IN LEPIDOPTERAN COTTON PESTS

THE PEST NAGEME NT GUIDE

2018 Peach Insect Management Update. Jim Walgenbach Dept Entomology & Plant Pathology MHCREC, Mills River, NC

Putting Sterile Insect Technique into the Modern IPM Toolbox: Over 20 years of successful area-wide integrated pest management in Canadian pome fruit

Romanian Journal of Plant Protection Vol. 1(2008)

Pear Scab in Oregon Symptoms, disease cycle and management

FRUIT IPM UPDATE #11

Non-Chemical Treatments for Control of Codling Moth Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Quetta Valley, Balochistan, Pakistan

Adrian Harris Philip Brain (Biometrician) Report Year 1 report 2012 (issued 7 May 2013)

SELECTIVE PESTICIDES AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL IN WALNUT PEST MANAGEMENT

scaffolds I N S E C T S NUMBERS RACKET IN THIS ISSUE... F R U I T J O U R N A L Update on Pest Management and Crop Development

Transcription:

Determining Impact of Third Generation Codling Moth, and Emergence Pattern of Overwintered Moths W. W. Barnett University of California Kearney Agricultural Center Parlier, California 93648 Cooperators: Frank Za10m, UC/IPM, Davis Bill Olson, UCCES,Orovi11e Pat Maier, UC/IPM, Davis Mike Pitkarin, UC/IPM, Davis Wayne Johnson, UCCES,Davis Bob Beede, UCCES,Hanford Kathy Pinto, UCCES,Kearney Ag. Center Kathy Jenner, USDA,Fresno Pat Vail, USDA,Fresno Abstract Research conducted in 1989 indicate there is no direct relationship between pheromone trap catches and emergence of overwintered codling moth. It was also shown that overwintered larvae which receive the most chilling units emerged over a shorter period of time when compared to larvae exposed to less chilling units. In the laboratory codling moth females deposited at least some eggs when exposed to constant temperatures as low as 55 degrees F. No stings or 1arvae were detected on walnuts which averaged less than 21mmin diameter. Introduction Codling moth is the.key pest in early bearing commercial varieties of walnuts. Early season treatments for this pest are disruptive to the biological cantrol of walnut aphid and mites. This leads to secondary pest outbreaks and additional pesticide applications to prevent economic damage are often needed. Pheromone traps are used to monitor codling moth in commercial orchards. Pheromone trap counts of overwintered moths often exhibit a bimodal f1 ight pattern. This causes confusion among growers and PCAs and may lead to unnecessary treatments for this pest which further compounds the disruption of biological control of aphids and mites. It has been well documented that many factors such as temperature, wind, type of trap, trap. height and care and maintenance of traps can impact pheromone trap catches. Because of these factors there is reason to question whether trap catch is a good indicator of the emergence egg laying and subsequent larval emergence of overwintered codling moth. There are indications that the amount of winter chilling has an impact on the emergence of overwintered codling moth. If this is indeed true, and we could - -- - -- 134

forecast emergence patterns by looking at the amount of chilling we would be better able to determine the need for first generation treatments and more accurately time treatments aimed at first generation larvae. It is widely believed that adult codling moth females only lay eggs if sundown temperatures are above 62 degrees F. Data to support this belief are sparse at best. Treatment timing decisions are often made taking into account the lower threshold for egg laying is 62 degrees. Validation of this belief would contribute substantially to understanding of the behavior of codling moth. Objectives The original objectives of this project were twofold. The first objective was to verify when during the growing season codling moth infested nuts could survive the harvest process and be scored as offgrade. The second was to determine whether pheromone trap counts are a reliable indicator of the behavior of codling moth or whether the bimodal peak trap catches are an artifact due to other factors relating to the trapping of the moth. Other objectives of determining the emergencepattern of overwintered larvae subjected to differing amounts of winter chilling, and determining the lower threshold for egg laying and minimumnut size for larval infestation were added after the project was initiated. Methods and Procedures Emergence of Overwintered Adults: Corrugated cardboard bands were placed around the trunks or scaffolds of walnut trees to trap mature codling moth larvae as they crawled down the tree to spin ovewintering cocoons. A minimum of 100 trees were banded in orchards located near Tulare, Winters and Gridley on August 1. Aluminum flashing was placed around the bands in the Winters orchard to prevent predation from birds. Many of the overwintering larvae trapped in the Tulare orchard were destroyed by birds. The bands in Butte county did not need to be covered because with only 2 to 4 larvae per band it was felt that the low population would be too low for birds to bother. In Butte County bands containing codling mothwere removedweekly, beginning with the first trapped adult moth. Bandswere dissected and the percent of empty pupal cases was calculated. The percent emergence on each date and pheromone trap catches were recorded. At Tulare all bands were removed when the fi rst ad.ult codl i ng moth was caught in pheromonetraps, placed in an emergence cage in the orchard, and adult emergence followed. The orchard where the bands were pl aced near Winters had to be removed because of blackline. In order to save the experiment, orientation of the bands -- - 135

was marked and bands and slabs of wood with the bands still around them were removed from the orchard using chain saws. The slabs were placed in emergence cages in a nearby walnut orchard oriented in the samedirection as they were on the tree and adult emergence followed. Determining Codling Moth Emergence After Different Amounts of Winter Chilling: Cardboard bands containing overwintering larvae were collected at intervals throughout the winter from the Tulare site. Bands containing pre-pupae were brought into the laboratory and incubated at 70 degrees F. under natural light. The amount of chilling was calculated as chill hours below 45 degrees F. beginning on November 1, 1988. Collections were made after 911 chill hours (3/18), 1062 chill hours (2/1), \333 chill hours (2/27) and 1414 chill hours (3/18). The first moth was caught in pheromone traps on 3/18. Emerged adults were collected daily, sexed, and the number recorded to determine emergence rates. Codling Moth Infestation in Walnuts: Nut infestation was followed in a mature Serr orchard in Tulare County. Beginning at 7mmnut size, four 50 nut samples were collected at random, and returned to the laboratory for examination. After measuring the diameter of each nut the number of eggs, larvae, stings, and entries was recorded. Live larvae were held for head capsule measurements to determine instars. Codling Moth Egg Laying: Adult moths were collected from the cages involved in the chilling project which were held in the laboratory at 70 degrees F. If at least 5 pairs were not available on one day, moths were held at 40 degrees F until 5 pairs emerged. After enough moths were collected five pairs were placed in battery jars near an east facing window overnight for mating. Mated moths were transferred to egg laying cages and placed in environmental chambers under constant light (one 25 watt incandescent light bulb) at 75% RH at 55, 59, 62 or 75 degrees F. Moths were left in the environmental chamber for two days then the number of eggs deposited on egg laying sheets counted. Results and Discussion The pattern for pheromone trap counts were similar for Tulare and Yolo counties, Fig. 1 & 2. Each had 3 peaks, the first two at 200 and 500 degree days after biofix. The third peak occurred 800 degree days after biofix at Tulare and 900 in Yolo County. Trap counts in Butte County showed 2 peaks, Fig. 3, one at 200 and a second at 900 degree days after biofix. In Butte County the lowest counts experienced during emergence of the first generation occurred at about 500 degree days, the time of the second peak in Yolo and Tulare counties. Although degree days differed, adult emergence patterns from cardboard bands in Tulare and Yolo Counties was similar. In both orchards, Fig. 1 & 2, emergence from bands was not detected until well after moths had been caught in pheromone traps. In Tulare County there was a constant emergence from 100 to 300 degree days after biofix. Emergence declined after 300 degree days and by -- - 136

700 degree days was essentially complete. No further emergence occurred until 800 degree days when emergence resumed and was constant until. 1000 degree days after biofix when 100% had emerged. In Yolo County, Fig. 2, emergence began between 100 and 200 degree days after biofix and peaked at 500 degree days. Emergence declined rapidly after the peak until 1000 degree days. Moths continued to emerge until over 1200 degrees after biofix. Figure 3 showsthe emergencepattern in Butte County differing significantly from the other two orchards. After beginning at the same time as pheromonetrap biofix the rate of emergence was more or less constant until about 300 degree days when it decreased slightly until 400 degree days. After 400 degree days the emergence rate was more or less constant until 100 percent emergence at a little over 1000 degree days. As can be seen from the graphs, there appears to be little or no direct relationship between the pattern of pheromone trap counts and adult emergence from overwintering sites. Although the data are somewhat variable if anything there appears to be a reverse correlation with peak emergence occurring between 300 and 500 degree days after biofix. This points out the importance of using other observations in addition to trap counts when making recommendations for treatments. In fact one coul d make the case for not us i ng trap counts for treatment decisions because so many factors, many of which are probably not known influence the number of moths caught in pheromone traps. Figure 4 shows the results of the impact of winter chilling on the emergence of overwintering codling moth. As suspected the moths left in the field the longest and receiving the most the most chilling generally emerged earlier until about 85 percent emergence was completed. Whencomparing those moths collected after 1062 chill units to those collected after 1414 chill units 60 % emergence occurred almost 300 degree days earlier in those receiving the most chill units. This could contribute to extended emergence and poor control experienced during some seasons. This should be researched further to determine if extended overwintered emergence could be forecast which would allow growers to adjust their control program during those years when normal treatment timing does not fully cover the emergence. Results of laboratory experiments to determine the lower threshold for egg laying by codling moth is shown in Fig. 5. From this test it is obvious that after mating codling moth oviposition takes place at a much lower temperature than previously thought. Although the number of eggs was low, there was some egg laying at 55 degrees, with the number of eggs deposited increasing with temperature until 62 degrees when the rate of egg laying in response to increased temperature remained constant. The small amount of egg laying as low as 55 degrees could account for the second generation consisten~ly starting at about 1060 degree days after biofix even in years when sundown temperatures are below 62 degrees. It appears from these data that the importance of having 62 degrees at dusk has been overstated and unless prolonged cold temperatures are experienced, sundown temperatures after mating are probably not as important as previously thought and for the most cases can be ignored. 137

It has been thought for manyyears that codling moth does not attack walnuts unless nuts average at least 3/8th inches in diameter. Consequently the 3/8th inch average nut size has been widely recommendedas the time to apply chemicals for control of first generation larvae. Field observations over the years indicated this timing may be too early. In order to determine the minimum nut size which a codling moth larva would attack we followed first generation nut infestations in a Serr orchard in Tulare County. As can be seen in Table 1 the first stings were not observed until nut size averaged 21mmin diameter which was over 500 degree days after bi ofi x wi th pheromone traps. Even then only stings were observed and only one live first instar larva was found, Table 2. A week later on May 1, 600 degree days after biofix, nut size averaged almost 26mmdiameter. Only three live first instar larvae were found in the 200 nut sample. If one assumes, with good coverage, first instar larvae inside the nut can be killed, it appears the first treatment should have gone on about May 1, almost 3 weeks after nut size averaged 3/8 inch diameter and a month after 225 degree days from biofix. Although these data are preliminary they indicate recommendations for timing first generation sprays are 2 to 4 weeks earlier than they should be. Future research should include timing experiments to determine optimum timing for first generation sprays. --- ---- ---- 138

120 Fig. 4 EMERGENCE OF OVERWINTEREDCODLING MOlH 1989 100,~-- ~ ~ I-' 0 u g u 80 60 40 20 00 ~'.' l.'& ;,.' l.',.,.',.l'- ~ /.' -,-" _1>..'.....~...,.' l l.......... --......-... -..-....,,,,,,," 200 400 600 800,"..~ Date Collected(Chill Units), a 1/18(911)., --8-- 2/1(1062)," --0-2/27(1333),,,,,,,.,," Ii... 3/18 (1414) 1000 1200 1400 Degree Days

Table 1. Codling Moth larvae and damage in 200 nut sample Tulare County, 1989 Codlina Moth Date DO' Nut size (mm) stinas entries Larvae 4/11 300 7.1 0 4/17 415 14.3 0 4/24 521 21.9 4 3 (2) 5/1 605 25.9 15 3 5/9 793 33.7 24 2 16 (5) 5/16 889 34.8 10 0 6 6 (2) 5/23 1006 35.1 0 30 14 (5) 7 5/30 1111 16 2 39 18 (6) 4 6/5 1240 31 6 56 24 (1) 1 6/13 1422 24 0 19 13 (2) 3 6/26 1762 22 0 17 4 (l) 12 (dead) 'from biofix -- - --- - - 141

Table 2. Numberand s;ze of l;ve Codl;ng Moth larvae ;n 200 walnuts. Tulare County, 1989 INSTAR I II III IV V EMERGE 4-24 1 5-1 111 5-9 1111111 1 1111 5-16 1 III 5-23 11111 1 1111 1 1 11111111 5-30 11 1 111 III 1111 6-5 11111111111 111 III 11 1 6-13 11 11 1 1 --- -- -- - 142