BioMimics 3D in my Clinical Practice

Similar documents
BIOFLEX PEACE Registry

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

Pulsar stent technology

Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

RANGER SFA REGISTRY Interim Analysis. Bernd Gehringhoff, MD On behalf the Ranger SFA Registry Investigators

Minimizing Burden, the effect of thin strut and low Chronic Outward Force SE stents

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Clinically proven. ordering info. Vascular Intervention // Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System/0.018 /OTW. Pulsar-18

Could a combination of DCB + stent be the answer in complex SFA lesions

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions

Disclosures. In the DCB Era, How Do I Choose To Use a Stent? When to Stent and What Devices to Use in the SFA

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

SFA lesion treatment: China experience. Wei Liang, MD

REACT Treatment Rationale and Clinical Evidence. ICI Meeting 5th of December 2017

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

Or is the ivolution stent a better alternative? EVOLUTION 12-month data

4/14/2016. Faculty Disclosure. Drug-eluting technology in the SFA and Popliteal. Typical SFA Disease Pattern. Why Peripheral Artery Disease Matters

Disclosures. Rational Selection of Endovascular Options for the SFA and Popliteal: What Works Where and for How Long?

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

Interventional options with modern 4F nitinol stents in SFA lesions

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

Atherectomy: Jetstream and Directional. George S. Chrysant, M.D.

Long-term results with interwoven nitinol stents vs. BMS vs. DCB

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions Preliminary report

MEET M. Bosiers K. Deloose P. Peeters. SFA stenting in 2009 : The good and the ugly What factors influence patency?

OCT Guided Atherectomy: Initial Results of the VISION Trial Using the Pantheris Catheter. Patrick Muck, MD

The Crack and Pave technique for highly resistant calcified lesions. Manuela Matschuck MD University Hospital Leipzig Department Angiology

Atherectomy is Still Live and Effective. John R. Laird, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director of the Vascular Center UC Davis Health System

Which Stent Is Best for Various Femoropopliteal Anatomy? 2018 Pacific Northwest Endovascular Conference June 15-26, 2018 Seattle, WA

Preliminary 12 Months results of the RAPID trial

2-YEAR DATA SUPERA POPLITEAL REAL WORLD

TOBA Trial 12 months Results

Stents for Femoropopliteal Disease:

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

Long-term Zilver PTX Data from Japan: 5-year Results in the Real World

Excimer Laser angioplasty for femoro-popliteal disease. Sendai Kousei Hospital, Tokyo Kamata Hospital Naoto Inoue MD, FSCAI, FJCC, FAHA

New Data to Shape the Era of Drug Elution in Peripheral Interventions

12-Month and preliminary 24-month outcomes of combining a DCB with a modern generation of nitinol stent in fem-pop lesions. BIOLUX 4EVER study

Cutting/scoring balloon Cryoplasty Drug-eluting balloon Brachytherapy Debulking Restent (BMS or DES) John R. Laird, MD

2 Year Results from the MDT SFA Japan Trial - DCB vs. standard PTA for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA/PPA

DCB in my practice: How the evidence influences my strategy. Yang-Jin Park

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

Shaping the future with the swirling flow stent

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

Is a Stent or Scaffold Necessary in The SFA?

Update in femoral angioplasty & stenting PRO

Tools and options for recanalisation of long-femoro-popliteal segments

Update on Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) Below the Knee. Marianne Brodmann, MD Medical University Graz Graz, Austria

Zilver PTX Post-Market Surveillance Study of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Treating Femoropopliteal Artery Disease in Japan: 24-Month Results

Real PTX RCT: 3 year data from a randomized comparison of DCB vs. DES in femoropopliteal lesions

SUPERSUB Trial: 1-yr outcomes of SUPERa SUBintimal stenting in CLI Patients

Lutonix DCB in BTK Update on the BTK real world registry and RCT

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC on behalf of KANSHAS 1 investigators; Tepe G, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Deloose K, Verbist J, Goverde P, Zeller T

Combination therapy : treatment rationale and clinical evidence

The BATTLE Trial Comparing Bare Metal to Drug Eluting Stents for Intermediate Length Lesions of the SFA

BIOLUX 4EVER : Combining Passeo-18 Lux DCB and Pulsar-18 BMS : 12 month results of full cohort

Current Status and Limitations in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

Hybrid Heparin-Bonded Nitinol and eptfe Stent in the treatment of popliteal artery occlusion: mid- term follow-up results.

LIBERTY 360 Study. 15-Jun-2018 Data 1. Olinic Dm, et al. Int Angiol. 2018;37:

COMPARE-Pilot RCT: 1-year results of a randomised comparison of RANGER DCB vs. IN.PACT DCB in complex SFA lesions. Dierk Scheinert

MICHAEL R. JAFF, DO MASSACHUSETTS, UNITED STATES. Medtronic Further. Together

William A. Gray MD System Chief of Cardiovascular Services, Main Line Health President, Lankenau Heart Institute Wynnewood, PA USA

Efficacy of DEB in Calcification and Subintimal Angioplasty

ILLUMENATE FIH Direct DCB Cohort 12-Month Results

Dierk Scheinert, MD. Department of Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Clinical benefits on DES Patient s perspectives

Hiroshi Ando, MD Kasukabe Chuo General Hospital Saitama, Japan

Six Month Results of the Global BIOLUX P-III All-Comers Registry using Drug Coated Balloon in Infra-Inguinal Artery Disease

Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Stents in Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Health Technology Assessment

DCB + stent in the SFA

EffPac - Trial: Assessment of the Effectiveness of DCB versus POBA in the SFA Ulf Teichgräber, MD, MBA

Treatment Strategies for Long Lesions of greater than 20 cm

CHALLENGES IN FEMORO-POPLITEAL STENTING

Surgical Bypass vs. Zilver PTX stent for long SFA lesions : Interim results of the ZilverPass Trial

Sustained Release. Superior Results.

Disclosures. In-Stent Restenosis: The Tail IS Wagging the Dog 4/15/2016. Restenosis: The Continuing Challenge for Peripheral Vascular Intervention

Alternative concepts for drug delivery in BTK arteries the LIMBO project

Endovascular Therapy vs. Open Femoral Endarterectomy Rationale and Design of the Randomized PESTO Trial

Evidence-Based Optimal Treatment for SFA Disease

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

Lessons learnt from DES in the SFA is there any ideal concept so far?

The Role of Lithotripsy in Solving the Challenges of Vascular Calcium. Thomas Zeller, MD

ISR-treatment The Leipzig experience with purely mechanical debulking. Sven Bräunlich Department for Angiology University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Neuestes aus der Therapie der pavk. beschichtete Stents + Ballons. Karls-University. Eberhard-Karls. of Tubingen Department of Diagnostic Radiology

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg, MD, FESC Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster. Dierk Scheinert, M.D. Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR

A Data-driven Therapeutic Algorithm For Choosing Among Currently Available Tools For SFA Intervention

The drug-eluting balloon superficial femoral artery-long study THE DEB SFA-LONG STUDY

Surgical Bypass or. Zilver PTX. 12 months preliminary data. LINC 2016, Leipzig. Marc Bosiers, MD. Marc Bosiers Koen Deloose Joren Callaert

DCB level 1 evidence review

Transcription:

BioMimics 3D in my Clinical Practice M Lichtenberg M.D. Vascular Centre Arnsberg / German Venous Centre Arnsberg CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) Law to Investigational Use PAM 178 Issue 00

1. Caro et al. 2013 J R Soc Interface 10: 20130578 2. Data on file at Veryan Medical A nitinol self-expanding stent with a 3D helical centreline Promotes swirling flow to increase wall shear 1, which is protective for atherosclerosis and intimal hyperplasia Enhances biomechanical performance 2

PAM 122 Issue 00

MIMICS Clinical Programme

MIMICS Clinical Programme

MIMICS Clinical Programme

MIMICS-3D Registry A Prospective, Multicentre Observational Study to Evaluate BioMimics 3D Stent in PAD PI: Michael Lichtenberg MD Primary Endpoints: Safety: composite of death, major amputation or CDTLR through 30 days Effectiveness: freedom from CDTLR through 12-months Minimum targeted enrolment: 500 subjects Follow-up: 3 years Current status: 21 European centres have rapidly enrolled 380/500+ subjects Target mid-2018 completion of enrolment 75 subjects enrolled at Vascular Centre Arnsberg

MIMICS-3D Registry Baseline Patient Demographics (interim: N=377 subjects; target >500) N= 377 Subjects Age Mean years ± SD (N) 70.0 ± 9.6 (377/377) Gender Male / Female 257 (68.2%) / 120 (31.8%) Diabetes Mellitus 37.5% (141/376) Risk Factors Hypertension 82.4% (310/376) Hypercholesterolemia 62.8% (236/376) Smoker Current / Former 67.0% (252/376) Coronary Revascularization Previous Percutaneous or 24.2% (91/376) Surgical 0 0.3% (1/373) 1 1.1% (4/373) 2 19.0% (71/373) Rutherford Category 3 56.6% (211/373) 4 7.5% (28/373) 5 13.7% (51/373) 6 1.9% (7/373) Ankle Brachial Index Mean ± SD (N) 0.59 ± 0.24 (299/377) 1. Data on file at Veryan Medical

MIMICS-3D Registry Baseline Lesion Characteristics (interim: N=377 subjects; target >500) N= 381 Lesions Treated target lesions (n= 373 subjects) % 1 target lesion 97.9% (365/373) % 2 target lesions 2.1% (8/373) Reference Vessel Diameter (mm) Mean ± SD 5.5 ± 0.7 (376) Lesion Type De novo 92.6% (351/379) Restenotic 7.4% (28/379) Prox SFA 18.5% (70/378) Mid SFA 34.9% (132/378) Lesion Location Distal SFA 30.4% (115/378) Prox. Pop 8.5% (32/378) Ostial SFA 5.6% (21/278) Other 2.1% (8/378) Diameter Stenosis (%) Mean ± SD 94.6 ± 7.8 (379) Lesion Length (mm) Mean ± SD 118.8 ± 88.4 (379) Grade 0 18.6% (70/377) Grade 1 31.8% (120/377) Calcification (%) Grade 2 23.3% (88/377) Grade 3 13.0% (49/377) Grade 4 13.3% (50/377) Run-off (%) - 1 or more patent tibial artery (<50% stenosis) 97.6% (372/381) 1. Data on file at Veryan Medical

MIMICS-3D Registry Baseline Procedure Data (interim: N=377 subjects; target >500) N= 381 Lesions BioMimics 3D Stents placed # Stents / N 484 / 381 1 stent 78.0% (297/381) 2 stents 17.8% (68/381) 3 stents 3.4% (13/381) 4 stents 0.8% (3/381) Stented Segment Length Mean ± SD (mm) 125.2 ± 74.1 (377) Diameter Stenosis Pre-stent % ± SD 94.6 ± 7.8 (379) Post-stent % ± SD 6.5 ± 8.1 (379) Other target lesion treatments Drug coated balloon 50.4% (192/381) Pre-stenting 38.5% (74/192) Post-stenting 58.9% (113/192) Pre- and post-stenting 2.6% (5/192) Atherectomy 9.4% (36/381) Thrombectomy 5.8% (22/381) Cutting balloon 3.7% (14/381) Other BMS 1.3% (5/381) Covered stent 0.8% (3/381) DES 0.5% (2/381) Technical success 99.5% (377/379) 1. Data on file at Veryan Medical

MIMICS-RCT vs. MIMICS-2 vs. MIMICS-3D Lesion and Stented Segment Length Mean ± SD (mm) (n/n) MIMICS-RCT MIMICS-2 MIMICS-3D Lesion Length 66 ± 29 (50/50) 81.2 ± 38.4 (269/271) 118.8 ± 88.4 (379/380) Stented Segment Length 99 ± 30 (50/50) 112.3 ± 36.3 (269/271) 125.2 ± 74.1 (377/380) Core lab reported data for MIMICS and MIMICS-2, site-reported for MIMICS-3D MIMICS-3D in summary: Longer lesions, sicker patients, more calcium Large majority are stent+dcb; or DCB+stent Highly relevant population for a contemporary Registry 1. Data on file at Veryan Medical

BioMimics 3D Arnsberg single-centre registry Consort Chart of first 161 Patients Objective: Evaluation of safety and performance of BioMimics 3D in treatment of subjects with atherosclerotic disease Design: All Comers Registry with follow-up investigations at 6, 12 and 24 months Indication: Subjects with infrainguinal atherosclerotic disease eligible for stent implantation First 161 consecutive subjects August 2015 - June 2016 144 patients at 6 month FUP 94 patients at 12 month FUP

Patient demographics at baseline Patient demographics N = 161 Male 118 (73%) Age Median (Min/Max) 72 (26/91) Hypertension 160 (99.1%) Dyslipidemia 158 (98.1%) Smoker (current or previous) 66 (47.5%) Diabetes 60 (37.5%) Renal Insufficiency 35 (21.8%) CLI (Rutherford 4/5/6) Rutherford (n=161) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 36 (22.3%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (1.2%) 58 (36.0%) 65 (40.3%) 20 (12.4%) 12 (8.5%) 4 (2.5%) Ankle brachial index (n=122) Ø 0.63 Walking capacity (m) (n=43) Ø 118.7

Lesion characteristics at baseline Lesion characteristics N = 161 Lesion length (mm) 127.2 +/- 107 SFA (prox distal) 121 Popliteal artery 44 TASC A lesion 28 (16.9%) TASC B lesion 44 (26.6%) TASC C lesion 46 (27.8%) TASC D lesion 47 (28.4%) Calcification 0 None 1 Mild 2 Moderate 3 Severe Moderate & Severe 32 (19.3%) 70 (42.4%) 40 (24.2%) 23 (13.9%) 63 (38.2%) De novo stenosis 150 (90.1%) Restenosis 15 (9,1%)

Treatment regime Patients N = 161 Stent only 78 (52%) 1 Stent 130 (80.7%) 2 Stents 25 (15.5%) 3 Stents 6 (3.7) Stent plus DCB 25 (15.5%) Stent plus rotational thrombectomy 18 (11.1%) Stent plus atherectomy 36 (22.6%) Stent plus cutting balloon 22 (13.6%)

6 and 12 months patency follow up data (DUS imaging cohort group, PSVR < 2.5) 6 months follow-up 12 months follow-up Patients (n) Primary Patency (%) Lesion length (mm) Patients Primary Patency (%) Lesion length (mm) SFA & POP 100 83 (83,0 %) 127 ± 107 75 55 (73,3 %) 116 ± 94 SFA 90 75 (83,3 %) 132 ± 109 68 51 (75,0 %) 119 ± 96 POP 10 8 (80,0 %) 72 ± 60 7 4 (57,1 %) 86 ± 67

6 and 12 months ftlr follow-up 6 months follow-up 12 months follow-up Patients (n) Freedom From TLR (%) Lesion length (mm) Patients (n) Freedom from TLR (%) Lesion length (mm) SFA & POP 144 139 (96,5 %) 126 ± 106 94 83 (88,3%) 118 ± 96 SFA 131 127 (96,9 %) 129 ± 109 87 78 (89,7%) 121 ± 98 POP 13 12 (92,3 %) 85 ± 57 7 5 (71,4%) 94 ± 66

12 months follow-up data in perspective STUDY NAME DEVICE A.L.L. PP FTLR ARNSBERG REGISTRY BioMimics 3D 12.7 cm 73.3% 88.3% BIOFLEX PEACE Pulsar-18 11.9 cm 73.6% 96.2% 4EVER Pulsar-18 10.8 cm 73.4% 85.2% PEACE Pulsar-18 11.2 cm 79.5% 81.0% RESILIENT Lifestent 6.2 cm 81.3% 87.3% ZILVER FLEX (PTX study) Zilver Flex 6.3 cm 73.0% 77.0% ZILVER PTX Zilver PTX (DES) 6.6 cm 83.1% 90.5% DURABILITY II EverFlex 8.9 cm 77.2% N/A SUPERA Supera 9.0 cm 84.7% N/A DURABILITY EverFlex 9.6 cm 72.2% 79.1% ABSOLUTE Absolute 10.1 cm 63.0% N/A

Conclusions The preliminary results of the Arnsberg BioMimics All Comers Registry with a mean lesion length of 127 mm shows: TASC C and D lesions: 56.2% of patients treated Moderate/severe calcification: 38.2% of patients treated Very promising overall primary patency and freedom from TLR data in patients with SFA and POP lesions, including complex lesions In perspective to other nitinol stent studies the swirling flow stent seems to have additional benefits in terms of clinical outcome Further evaluation of the entire study population with continued follow up is on-going to give more detailed and longer term insight especially in combination with DCBs and extensive lesion preparation

BioMimics 3D in my Clinical Practice M Lichtenberg M.D. Vascular Centre Arnsberg / German Venous Centre Arnsberg CAUTION: Investigational Device. Limited by Federal (or United States) Law to Investigational Use PAM 178 Issue 00