EFFECT OF SULPHUR FERTILIZATION ON GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY OF SESAME (SESAMUM INDICUM L.) IN MID CENTRAL ZONE OF ODISHA ABSTRACT

Similar documents
EFFECTS OF ZINC AND BORON ON YIELD, NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND ECONOMICS OF MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L.) IN MUSTARD-MAIZE CROPPING SEQUENCE

Response of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) to Various Levels of Nitrogen and Potassium at Different Crop Growth Stages

Quality and yield of Indian mustard genotypes as influenced by different fertility levels

UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS BY WHEAT AS INFLUENCED BY LONG- TERM PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION

Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on growth and yield of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.)

Response of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Levels on Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Dynamics of potassium fractions in a calcareous Vertic Haplustepts under AICRP-LTFE soils

Assessment of Secondary and Micro Nutrient Status under Long-Term Fertilizer Experiment on Vertisol

Effect of Micronutrients Application on Availability of Zn, Fe and B of Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) in Inceptisol

Evaluation of Suitable Nutrient Management on Dual Purpose Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Crop under New Alluvial Zone (NAZ) of West Bengal, India

Role of Potassium and Sulphur on the Growth, Yield and Oil Content of Soybean (Glycine max L.)

Yield and quality of cumin as influenced by FYM enriched micronutrients

Effect of nitrogen, zinc and boron on growth, yield attributes and yield of wheat under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh

Influence of sulphur fertilization on nutrient uptake of onion (Allium cepa L.)

EFFECT OF SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATIONS OF ZINC AND IRON ON THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF ONION (Allium cepa L.) Abstract

Effect of Different Levels of Zinc and Sulphur on Yield and Yield Attributing Characters of Indian Mustard

Effect of Foliar Application of Zinc and Boron on Fruit Growth, Yield and Quality of Winter Season Guava (Psidium guajava L.)

HIND AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING INSTITUTE

Effect of Phosphorous and Zinc Fertilisation on the Productivity of Transplanted Aromatic Rice

RESPONSE OF BIO FERTILIZERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH INORGANIC FERTILIZERS IN KHARIF PADDY

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 5, 2016,

How to Develop a Balanced Program for Pecan and Chili. Robert R Smith

Influence of High-P-Chelated Micronutrients on Nutrient Uptake of Chickpea Under Vertisols

Effects of Different Levels of NPK and Sulphur on Growth and Yield Attributes of Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Cv. Varuna

RESPONSE OF GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.) TO BALANCED FERTILIZATION UNDER SUB-HUMID SOUTHERN PLAIN ZONE OF RAJASTHAN

Effect of High-P-Chelated Micronutrient Foliar Spray on Yield and Quality of Chickpea

Effect of FYM, biofertilizers and zinc on phosphorus uptake by maize

Effects of sulphur fertilization on yield, S uptake and quality of Indian mustard under varied irrigation regimes

THE GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY PARAMETERS OF BANANA CULTIVAR GRAND NAINE (AAA) AS INFLUENCED BY DIFFERENT ORGANIC AMENDMENTS

Department of Agronomy, N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Faizabad (Uttar Pradesh), India. 2

Management of Coriander Wilt (Fusarium oxysporium) through Cultural Practices as Organic Amendments and Date of Sowing

Understanding a Soil Report

Effect of different growth regulating compounds on biochemical and quality parameters in greengram

Eeffect of biofertilizers and foliar application of organic acids on yield, nutrient uptake and soil microbial activity in soybean

Influence of Different Planting Material and Major Nutrient Application on Yield Attributes of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.)

Effect of Boron and Sulphur Application on Plant Growth and Yield Attributes of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Lysine and Linoleic Acid Content of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merill) under Temperate conditions

STUDIES ON IMPACT OF UREA, THIOUREA AND ZINC APPLICATION ON GROWTH YIELD QUALITY AND ECONOMIC OF WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.)

Response of Zinc Fertilization to Wheat on Yield, Quality, Nutrients Uptake and Soil Fertility Grown In a Zinc Deficient Soil Keram, Komal Singh

Impact of NPK Application on Growth and Yield of Guava cv. Hisar Safeda

Response of Zinc and Sulphur on Growth and Yield of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Sodic Soil

Influence of Nitrogen and Sulphur on Yield and Quality Parameters of Spineless Safflower under Irrigated Conditions

Effect of Nutrient Combinations on Plant Pigments and Yield of Bt Cotton Under Rainfed Condition

ISSN International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of Biofertilizers and Inorganic Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)

Effect of Different Micronutrients on Turmeric Variety Suranjana in Terai Region of West Bengal, India

Chapter 1: Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management

EFFECT OF ZINC FERTILIZATION ON GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY OF WHEAT GROWN UNDER AGRO-CLIMATIC CONDITION OF KYMORE PLATEAU OF MADHYA PRADESH, INDIA

An Asian Journal of Soil Science Vol. 6 No. 1 (June, 2011) : 11-16

Effect of different application method of humic acid on nodulation and seed yield of soybean

Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi , India

Terry Richmond s Fertilizer Package mentioned in the panel discussion March 14, 2013.

Interaction Effect of Phosphorus and Sulphur on Yield and Quality of Soybean in a Vertisol

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Volume 2, No 2, Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing Association

Scenario of Castor Seed

AGRONOMIC BIOFORTIFICATION OF GREEN BEAN (PHASELOUS VULGARIS L.) WITH ELEMENTAL SULPHUR AND FARMYARD MANURE

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED

RESPONSES OF GARLIC TO ZINC, COPPER, BORON AND MOLYBDENUM APPLICATION IN GREY TERRACE SOIL OF AMNURA SOIL SERIES

5. Plant Physiology/Chemistry Section

Analysis. Methods of. of Soils, Plants, Waters, Fertilisers & Organic Manures. Edited by HLS Tandon

Effect of Iron Application and Rhizobium Inoculation on Uptake of Nutrients in Grain and Stover of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Effect of N, Zn and Fe application on N, P, K content and total uptake in parmal rice (Oryza sativa L.)

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN MUNG BEAN (VIGNA RADIATA L.) THROUGH SULPHUR AND BIOFERTILIZERS

Efficacy of various edible and non-edible oils against Sitophilus oryzae L. in sorghum

EFFECT OF COPPER LEVELS ON COPPER CONTENT IN SOIL NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAX) VARIETIES

Effect of the graded levels of potassium with recommended NP on soil properties under maize cultivation in alfisols of Mandya, Karnataka

Effect of Zinc and Iron Ferti-Fortification on Growth, Pod Yield and Zinc Uptake of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotypes

Sorghum is an important forage crop grown in summer

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FOR ENHANCED YIELD AND QUALITY OF SOYBEAN (

The effect of nano-micronutrients seed priming on germinability of Kabuli chickpea

Effect of Canning Variables on Physical Biochemical and Microbial Parameters of Peas

Animal, Plant & Soil Science. D3-7 Characteristics and Sources of Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Volume 3, No 1, Copyright by the authors - Licensee IPA- Under Creative Commons license 3.

Available online at

QUALITY OF CORMS AS INFLUENCED BY CORM WEIGHT AT VARIOUS LEVELS OF NUTRITION IN GLADIOLUS CV. AMERICAN BEAUTY

Influence of Foliar Application of Urea, Potassium sulphate and Borax on the Fruit Quality of Guava

Major nutrient contents and their uptake by brinjal as influenced by phosphorus and sulphur

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 5, 2016,

Plant Food. Nitrogen (N)

Estimating Micronutrient Status and their Relationship with Other Soil Properties of Rewa District in Fiji

IM PACT OF DIF FER ENT LEV ELS OF ZN ON YIELD, QUAL ITY AND SOIL PROP ER - TIES OF SOY BEAN IN A VERTISOL

Nitrophoska. Cereals, fodder beet, horticulture, maize and vegetables. Precise nutrition for superior plant performance

FROM SOIL ELEMENTS TO FOOD NUTRIENTS: Joyce Kinabo Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Sokoine University, Tanzania

Plant Nutrients in Mineral Soils

Soil Program Recommendation

Nature s Neutraceuticals - Millets. * of corresponding author:

Effect of Enriched Composts on Rhizosphere Soil Enzymatic Activity of Soybean in Vertisols

Quality of the United States Soybean Crop: Dr. Jill Miller-Garvin, Dr. James Orf, and Dr. Seth Naeve

Sulphur Fertilizer Effect on Crop Development & Quality

Integrated Application of Micronutrients to Improve Growth, Yield, Quality and Economic Yield in Potato - A Review

Nutrient Content of Vegetable Amaranth (Amaranths cruentus L.) At Different Harvesting Stages

Total zinc was determined by digesting the soil ZnSO 4

A study on formulation, evaluation and analysis of soya-idli

Effect of Phosphorus and Sulphur on Growth and Yield of Soybean (Glycine max L.)

Nutritional quality evaluation of Rice bean flour based Boondi

Influence Of Cow Urine And NAA on Chemical, Biochemical And Yield Contributing Parameters And Yield Of Linseed

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Heterosis Studies in Indian Mustard [Brassica Juncea]

SOYBEAN YIELD ANALYSIS WITH POTASSIUM AND ZINC FERTILIZERS APPLICATION

Potassium Supplying Capacity of Representative Soil Series of Sub-Montane Zone of Maharashtra, India

Transcription:

Int. J. Bio-res. Env. Agril. Sci. 1(1): 5-12 (2015) EFFECT OF SULPHUR FERTILIZATION ON GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY OF SESAME (SESAMUM INDICUM L.) IN MID CENTRAL ZONE OF ODISHA Sidhu Murmu 1, Kanu Murmu 2* and Manoranjan Satapathy 3 1 Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Chiplima, Sambalpur- 768 025 2 Department of Agronomy, F/Ag, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur 741252, Nadia (WB) 3 Regional Research and Technology Transfer Station, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Mahisapat- 759 001 *e-mail:kanumurmu@gmail.com Received: Oct. 2014 Revised accepted: Jan. 2015 ABSTRACT Yield and quality of oilseed crops are principally regulated by nutrient management at field level. Field experiments were conducted to study the effect of sulphur fertilisation on growth, yield and quality of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) in mid central zone of odisha. The sesame was grown during (August 27th and 25th) during the years 2010 to 2011. The sulphur sources of fertilizers were Gypsum, Zinc sulphate and Elemental sulphur (S) and 2 levels of S (20 and 40 kg ha-1) and absolute control (without S), another with Single Super Phosphate (SSP). Recommended Dose (RD) of SSP was superior over other sulphur fertilizers sources, in increasing yield components and yield in both the years. The quality parameters of sesame such as crude protein, oil content and soluble sugar improved under different sulphur fertilizer treatments, maximum being in RD with SSP. Sulphur fertilizer application, therefore exhibited potential in improving crop yield and quality of sesame under mid central zone of odisha. Keywords: Sesame, sulphur fertilizer, crop quality, crop yield. INTRODUCTION Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) is one of the important oilseed crops in India. Sesame seeds are rich source of food, nutrition, edible oil and bio-medicine. Sesame oil has excellent nutritional, medicinal, cosmetic and cooking qualities for which it is known as the queen of oils and content 46-64% oil with 25% protein (Goel and Kumar, 1994). Due to the presence of potent antioxidants, sesame seeds are called as the seeds of immortality. Sesame cake or meal obtained as a by-product of the oil milling industry is rich in protein, vitamin (Niacine) and minerals (Ca and P). The production of oilseed crops in our country including sesame is not enough to meet the domestic demand of the large population. Low production of sesame is attributed to the fact that the crop is usually grown during rainy season on marginal and less fertile soils. Further, lack of proper nutrient management is one of the major causes for low yields. Balanced fertilization with NPK was proved beneficial in all the oilseed crops both under rainfed and irrigated conditions. Further, nutrients like S, Ca, Cu and B are also needed for higher yields (Ghosh et al., 2002). Excessive use of agrochemicals has raised concern regarding depleting soil productivity and overall nutrient imbalance. Integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizers in a balanced proportion for sustainable production of sesame was therefore emphasized by USDA (1980) and Deshmukh et al., (2002). Integrated use of organic manures and mineral fertilizers helps in maintaining stability in crop production, besides improving soil physical conditions (Muthuswamy et al., 1990 and Subba Rao, 1994). Sulphur has long been recognized as one of the essential elements for plant growth particularly for oilseed crops. Sulphur is a constituent of three amino acids commonly found in plants viz., cystine, cystenine and methionine, which are essential components of proteins.

Sulphur increases the oil content and gives pungency to oil as it forms certain disulphide linkages. Oilseed crops require more sulphur than cereals as their oil storage organs are mostly proteins, rich in S. Deficiency of sulphur is known to hamper N metabolism in plants as well as synthesis of S-containing aminoacids and thus exerts adverse effects on both seed and oil yield. Sulphur (S) is essential for the growth and development, plays a key role in plant metabolism, indispensible for the synthesis of essential oils, plays a vital role in chlorophyll formation (Ajai Singh et al., 2000) required for development of cells and it increases cold resistance and drought hardness (Patel and Shelke, 1995) and constituent of a number of organic compounds (Shamina and Imamul 2003), oil storage organs particularly oil glands (Jaggi et al., 2000) and vitamin B1 (Thirumalaisamy et al., 2001). In the present investigation, we evaluate the effect of different sources of S on growth, yield and quality of sesame. MATERIALS AND METHODS Plant materials Sesamum variety Prachi was sown with 7.5 kg ha -1 seed with 30 cm apart. The crop was sown on August, 27 th and 25 th during the year 2010 and 2011 respectively. Study site Field experiment was conducted at Regional Research and Technology Transfer Station, Mahisapat during Kharif season of 2010 and 2011. The soil of the experimental field was sandy loam in texture with acidic ph (5.46), medium in organic carbon (0.69%), medium in available N (315 kg ha -1 ) low in available P 2 O 5 (11.26 kg ha -1 ), medium in available K 2 O (158.6 kg ha -1 ) and available sulphur was normal (10.03 ppm). The crop received only 235 mm of rainfall during cropping season as against the total rainfall of 1067 mm rainfall during the year, 2011. Treatments details The experiment was laid in a Randomized Block Design (RBD), where each treatment with three replications. Eight (8) treatments consisting of 2 levels of sulphur (20 and 40 kg ha -1 ), 3 sources of sulphur (Gypsum, Zinc Sulphate and Elemental S) and absolute control (No sulphur application), another with single super phosphate (SSP) were tested. T 1 Control (No S) RD without SSP, T 2 T 1 + 20kg S ha -1 as Gypsum, T 3 T 1 + 40kg S ha -1 as Gypsum, T 4 T 1 + 20 kg S ha -1 as ZnSO 4, T 5 T 1 + 40 kg S ha -1 as ZnSO 4, T 6 T 1 + 20kg S ha -1 as Elemental sulphur, T 7 T1+ 40kg S ha -1 as Elemental sulphur and T 8 RD with SSP. The plant height, yield components such number of capsules per plant, number of seeds per capsule, test weight and seed yield as well as stalk yield per hectare. Among quality parameter Crude protein Total nitrogen was determined by the Kjeldahl method as described by Pearson (1970). Protein was calculated using the general factor (6.25) (Khalid et al., 2003). Oil content (%) Fifteen grams of dried seeds of sesame drawn from the net plot of each treatment were used for estimation of oil content by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) method and expressed in percentage. 6

Soluble sugars Sugars were extracted with ethanol (960 ml l -1 ) by shaking at 50 o C for 30 min (Larrauri et al., 1996). After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected and the sugar content was analysed with phenol/sulphuric acid reagent (Dubois et al., 1956). Starch After removing sugars with ethanol (80%), starch was isolated by extraction with perchloric acid reagent (52%) twice, from a sugar-free residue according to the method described by McCready et al. (1950). Starch in the extract was determined using the anthrone reagent and colorimetric measurement at 630 nm. Statistical analysis The data of the experiment involving eight treatments of nutrient management and three replications conducted in a randomized completely block design were statistically analyzed using standard procedures as described by Gomez and Gomez (1984). To determine the significance of the treatment effect, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tables were prepared for the data on crop growth and yield and quality using a statistical package MSTATC. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The growth and yield components measured in term of plant height, number of capsules and seeds per capsule are presented in Tables 1. Applications of different sulphur sources of fertilizers have shown significant improvement in all yield parameters than control in both the years. As regards to plant height, maximum value was found in T 3 (T 1 + 40kg S ha -1 as Gypsum) treatment in both the years i.e.. 2010 and 2011, which were at par with T 8 (RD with SSP) treatment. These treatments recorded a significant higher plant height as compared to control treatment i.e. T 1 (without SSP) where the plant height was minimum. Plant height at harvest stage increase with increase in S levels. This might be due to more synthesis of amino acids, increase in chlorophyll content in growing region and improving the photosynthetic activity, ultimately enhancing cell division and thereby increased the crop growth rate (Table 1). This was evinced through the studies of Dubey and Khan (1993). The yield components measured in term of number of capsules, seeds/capsules and 1000- grain weight are presented in Table1. Applications of different sources of sulphur fertilizers treatments 7

Table 1: Yield and yield attributing characters of Sesamum as influenced by sources and graded doses of Sulphur application (2010 and 2011) Treatments Plant ht (cm) No. of capsules Seeds / Capsules Seed yield (q/ha) Stalk yield q/ha 1000-grain wt (g) 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 T 1 79.00 75.33 14.27 10.27 57.73 45.27 5.55 4.61 54.82 21.11 2.81 2.85 T 2 86.20 82.80 20.17 17.60 58.33 53.47 7.88 5.72 25.67 27.22 2.83 2.88 T 3 92.07 92.27 23.20 20.60 69.33 63.53 8.22 7.22 27.21 28.33 2.88 2.89 T 4 88.53 86.67 21.53 16.53 63.33 61.20 7.10 5.22 29.43 31.11 2.85 2.87 T 5 90.87 89.60 22.07 18.60 65.60 66.67 7.86 6.67 31.22 34.44 2.85 2.90 T 6 90.20 88.20 20.67 21.33 68.73 67.07 8.61 7.56 33.11 37.78 2.87 2.91 T 7 90.67 90.87 21.87 20.47 71.13 68.67 8.83 7.94 37.52 40.55 2.89 2.91 T 8 91.67 91.33 29.60 27.13 75.13 73.13 9.44 8.55 42.53 49.22 2.92 2.95 SEm (±) 1.64 2.14 1.59 1.81 2.31 3.41 0.45 0.52 3.65 3.32 0.01 0.01 CD (p=0.05) 2.07 7.56 2.34 5.82 5.92 9.21 1.22 2.36 12.33 18.72 NS NS 8

have shown significant improvement in all yield parameters than control treatment. As regards the number of capsules and seeds/capsules, maximum value was found in T 8 (RD with SSP) treatment in both the years and was significantly superior to rest of the sulphur sources of fertilizers. The minimum value was found in control treatment in both the years. There was no significant variation in number of capsules and seeds/capsules, between different sulphur sources of fertilizers in both the years. With regard to 1000-grain weight, T 8 (RD with SSP) treatment have shown maximum proficiency in this character and minimum in control (RD without SSP) in both the years and there was no significant difference among the treatments. This higher translocation was possible perhaps due to the better sink capacity as indicated by the higher number of capsules and seeds per plant. The better sink capacity might be attributed to the better dry matter production owing to better photosynthetic capacity of the plant during the reproductive phase of the crop. Higher dry matter production and translocation with the application of recommended dose of SSP through single super phosphate or in combination with FYM was also reported by Singh et al. (2000) and Deshmukh et al. (2002). Similar results were also observed in sunflower by Subha and Giri (2004), in mustard by Tigga et al. (2004) and in soybean by Singh and Rai (2004). The yield data of sesame seed and stalk yield was presented in Table 1. The seed yield and stalk yield was maximum in T 8 (RD with SSP) treatment which was significantly superior to control i.e. without SSP. In both the years, control treatment was recorded lowest seed and stalk yield. Application of sulphur resulted in improved growth and yield parameters and therefore, finally increased the seed yield. These findings are in accordance with the earlier reports of Devakumar and Giri (1998) and Tiwari et al. (2000). The lowest yield recorded under control treatment might be due to the limited availability of nutrient in soil and uptake of nutrient by the crop, which ultimately reflected on these results. The quality of sesame seed was assessed in terms of crude protein, oil content, soluble sugar and starch content. It was observed from Tables 2 that crude protein content of sesame seed was increase with increasing in sulphur dose i.e. T 1 + 40kg S/ha as Elemental Sulphur. The higher crude protein content of 28.73 and 28.77% were registered at T 8 tratment i.e. (RD with SSP) in both the years which was significantly superior over other sources of sulphur fertilizer treatments. The lowest crude protein content was recorded in control treatment without SSP i.e. T 1 treatment. The substantial increase in crude protein content with SSP might be due to increase availability of sulphur for subsequent synthesis of oil and crude protein. This is in agreement with the report of Chitkala and Reddy (1991). 9

Table 2: Quality of Sesame seeds influenced by sources and graded doses of Sulphur application (2010 and 2011) Treatments Crude protein (%) Oil content (%) Soluble sugar (% dry matter) Starch (mg/100 dry matter) 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 T 1 19.00 18.97 37.43 37.53 1.16 1.16 0.19 0.19 T 2 20.73 20.63 40.83 40.90 1.49 1.49 0.42 0.43 T 3 20.77 20.83 42.47 42.50 1.56 1.57 0.52 0.52 T 4 22.67 22.63 45.60 45.67 1.76 1.77 0.65 0.66 T 5 22.50 22.73 46.87 46.90 1.85 1.86 0.66 0.67 T 6 23.77 23.70 47.43 47.47 1.98 2.00 0.79 0.80 T 7 24.57 24.67 48.87 48.93 2.18 2.19 0.77 0.78 T 8 28.73 28.77 57.00 57.07 2.57 2.58 0.96 0.97 SEm (±) 0.43 0.45 1.19 1.18 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.03 CD (p=0.05) 1.28 1.35 3.62 3.59 0.18 0.17 NS NS The oil content of sesame seeds was significantly influenced by S application. Increasing the S level increased the oil content considerably (Table 2). The maximum oil content of 57.0 and 57.07% was recorded with the recommended with SSP i.e. T 8 treatment which was significantly superior over other sources of sulphur fertilizer treatments in both the years followed by T 7 treatment i.e. (T 1 + 40kg S/ha as Elemental Sulphur). The lowest oil content was recorded in control treatment without SSP i.e. T 1 treatment. This could be attributed to the influence of sulphur in rapid conversion of nitrogen to crude protein and finally to oil. The acetic thiolinase, a sulphur based enzyme in the presence of S convert acetyl C0-A to melonyl Co-A, rapidly resulting in higher oil content in seeds crops (Krishnamurthy and Mathan, 1996). The increase in oil content due to S application might be due to its key role in biosynthesis of oil in plants (Mudd, 1967). The soluble sugar content ranged between 1.16-2.57 % dry matter during 2010 and 1.16-2.58 % dry matter during 2011 (Tables 2). In both the years, T 8 treatment (RD with SSP) was significantly superior over other sources of sulphur fertilizer treatments. Control treatment i.e. T 1, RD without SSP has shown low level value of soluble sugar in both the years. Soluble sugar content expressed the consumer acceptance test i.e. the higher the sugar content the better is the acceptance. The experimental finding reveals that as compared to control or other sources of sulphur fertilizer treatments, the sugar content was significantly higher in RD with SSP treatment. It expressed that chemical fertilizer applied at full dose could gain the increasing sugar content as compared to control treatment. 10

The starch content expressed in term of mg/100 dry matter were in the range 0.19 to 0.96 during 2010 and 0.19 to 0.97 during 2011 (Tables 2). The higher starch content was noted in T8 treatment (RD with SSP) and minimum in control treatment i.e. T1, RD without SSP, which was similar in both the years. Sesame seed contained a low percentage of starch (0.19-0.97 mg/100 dry matter). Thus, the carbohydrate was dominated by the non-starch polysaccharide (Dietary fibre). The accumulation of oil was preceded by a marked rise in acetyl-coa carboxylase activity and acetyl-coa concentration, which declined rapidly when oil accumulation reached a plateau. Starch and soluble sugar content decreased, while protein content increased during the period of active oil accumulation in the developing seeds (Ahmad et al., 2000). CONCLUSION In intensive cropping systems, sulphur management plays an important role for enhancing crop yield and quality with maintenance soil health for sustainable production. In this experiment, application of recommended dose of SSP fertilizer along with other sources of sulphur fertilizers combination resulted higher growth, yield and quality of sesame compared to without application of sulphur. The effectiveness of RD with SSP was better pronounced in increasing crop growth, yield and quality. REFERENCE Ajai Singh, S.P., Singh, K. and Singh P.P. 2000. Resonse of nitrogen and sulphur on economic yield of sunflower under sodic soil condition. Indian Journal of Agriculture Science 70: 536-537. Ahmad, A., Khan, I. and Abdin, M.Z. 2000. Effect of sulfur fertilisation on oil accumulation, acetyl-coa concentration, and acetyl-coa carboxylase activity in the developing seeds of rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 51(8): 1023-1029. Chitkala, T.D. and Reddy, M.G. 1991. Efect of gypsum and P fertilizers on groundnut. Indian Journal of Agronomy 36: 265-266. Deshmukh, M.R., Jain, H.C., Duhoon, S.S. and Goswami, U. 2002. Integrated nutrient management in sesame for Kymore plateau zone of Madhya Pradesh. Journal of Oilseeds Research 19 (1): 73-75. Devakumar, M. and Giri, G. 1998. Influence of weed control and doses and time of gypsum application on yield attributes, pod and oil yields of groundnut. Indian Journal of Agronomy 43: 453-458. Dubey, O.P. and Khan, R.A. 1993. Efeect of nitrogen and sulphur content in Indian mustard and their residual balance in soil. Indian Journal of Agronomy 38: 582-587. Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A. and Smith, F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry 28: 350 356. Ghosh, P.K., Mandal, K.G., Bandyopadhyay, K.K., Hati, K.K., Rao, A.S. and Tripathi, A.K. 2002. The second International Agronomy congress on balancing food and environmental security A continuing challenge. New Delhi, India, 26-30 November 2002. Fertilizer News 47 (11): 67-77. 11

Goel, P.D. and Kumar, S. 1994. A great ancient oilseed sesamum. Framer and Parliament 12:6-7. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A.1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. Wiley- Interscience publication, Jhon Wiley and Sons. New York. Jaggi, R., Rakesh, C., Sharma, K. and Paliyal, S.S. 2000. Sulphur as second major nutrient in cruciferous oilseed. Indian Farming 12:14-18. Khalid, E.K., Babiker, E.E. and Tinay, A.H.2003. Solubility and functional properties of sesame seed proteins as influenced by ph and/ or salt concentration. Food Chemistry 82: 361 366. Krishnamurthy, V.V. and Mathan, K.K. 1996. Effect of sulphur on yield of groundnut. Madrash Journal of Agriculture 83: 640-642. Larrauri, J.A., Rupe rez, P., Borroto, B. and Saura-Calixto, F. 1996. Mango peels as a new tropical fibre: preparation and characterisation. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und Technologie 29: 729 733. McCready, R.M., Guggolz, J., Silviera, V. and Owens, H.S. 1950. Determination of starch and amylose in vegetables. Analytical Chemistry 22: 1156 1159. Mudd, J.B. 1967. Fat metabolism in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 18: 229-252. Muthuswamy, P., Santhy, P. and Ramanathan, G. 1990. Long term use of fertilizer on soil fertility and yield of crops in irrigated inceptisol. Journal of Indian Society for Soil Science 38: 541-542. Patel, J.R. and Shelke, V.B. 1995. Effect of farmyard manure, phosphorus and sulphur on growth, yield and quality if Indian mustard. Indian Journal of Agronomy 43: 713-717. Pearson, D. 1970. The chemical analysis of foods (5th ed.). London: J. & A. Churchill, p. 452. Singh, R. and Rai, R.K. 2004. Yield attributes, yield and quality of soybean (Glycine max) on influenced by integrated nutrient management. Indian Journal of Agronomy 49 (4): 271-274. Singh, M.K., Singh.T.K. and Singh, U.N. 2000. Effect of nitrogen and sulphur levels on yield and quality of linseed under dryland conditions. Journal of Oilseeds Research 17 (1): 162-164. Subha, K.M. and Giri, G. 2004. Effect of integrated nutrient management on dry matter accumulation, nutrient content and uptake by sunflower. Annals of Agricultural Research 25 (3): 398-402. ****** 12