TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE. Opinion. 29 November 2006

Similar documents
The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 3 October 2012

Horizon Scanning Technology Summary. Abatacept (Orencia) for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. National Horizon Scanning Centre.

The legally binding text is the original French version

Opinion 23 July 2014

Horizon Scanning Technology Summary. Adalimumab (Humira) for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. National Horizon Scanning Centre.

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 10 February 2010

Opinion 23 July 2014

Opinion 23 July 2014

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 8 November 2006

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 16 December 2009

Coverage Criteria: Express Scripts, Inc. monograph dated 12/15/ months or as otherwise noted by indication

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 26 April 2006

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 9 March 2011

The legally binding text is the original French version

Erelzi (etanercept) Frequently Asked Questions

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 26 November 2008

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 9 May 2012

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTE OPINION. 19 December 2007

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE. Opinion. 20 February 2008

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 10 December 2008

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 20 October 2010

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 31 January Date of marketing authorisation: 22 March 2005 (centralised marketing authorisation)

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 14 February 2007

Ad-Hoc Rheumatology Subcommittee of PTAC meeting held 8 March. (minutes for web publishing)

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 21 July 2010

Effective Health Care Program

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 28 April 2010

Opinion 23 April 2014

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 15 December 2010

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP) DRAFT

APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL AUTHORITY. Subsidy for Tocilizumab

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 19 July 2006

The legally binding text is the original French version

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 17 November 2010

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 9 May 2007

Paediatric rheumatology. Probability of remission of juvenile idiopathic arthritis following treatment with steroid joint injection

Medical Coverage Guidelines are subject to change as new information becomes available.

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 27 May 2009

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 21 July 2010

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 13 January 2010

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 19 December 2007

Certolizumab pegol (Cimzia) for psoriatic arthritis second line

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 15 October 2008

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 5 January 2011

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 9 January 2013

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 05 May 2010

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 15 December 2010

Opinion 8 January 2014

Using ENBREL to Treat Rheumatoid and Psoriatic Arthritis

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 10 March 2010

The legally binding text is the original French version

Overview of Paediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) in Paediatric Rheumatology

The legally binding text is the original French version

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 16 December 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta373

The legally binding text is the original French version

Opinion 1 October 2014

Rheumatoid Arthritis. Marge Beckman FALU, FLMI Vice President RGA Underwriting Quarterly Underwriting Meeting March 24, 2011

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 23 January 2008

F or readers unfamiliar with the current classification

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 4 November 2009

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE

Diseases in which appear swelling, redness, pain and heat; aspects of the immune system (Inflammatory and immunologic conditions-imid)

APPLICATION FOR SUBSIDY BY SPECIAL AUTHORITY

Update on Enthesitis-Related Arthritis, a Subtype of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 29 April 2009

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 13 May 2009

Horizon Scanning Centre November Secukinumab for active and progressive psoriatic arthritis. SUMMARY NIHR HSC ID: 5330

European Medicines Agency decision

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE

Opinion 24 July 2013

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 6 October 2010

Opinion 24 July 2013

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 18 January 2012

The clinical effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroids for arthritis of the lower limb in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 28 March 2012

Keywords: Prescribing pattern, Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 11 April 2012

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 27 May 2009

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 19 May 2010

JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 28 May 2008

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE. The legally binding text is the original French version OPINION. 21 June 2006

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 6 October 2010

Opinion 18 December 2013

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 29 April 2009

Abatacept (Orencia) for active rheumatoid arthritis. August 2009

2017 Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana

APPLICATION FOR SUBSIDY BY SPECIAL AUTHORITY

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 18 February 2009

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 29 April 2009

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 13 December 2006

The Use of Methotrexate in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Single Center Experience

Ontario Public Drug Programs. Inflectra (infliximab) Frequently Asked Questions

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 27 January 2010

GUIDELINES IN FOCUS. Authorship: Brazilian Medical Association (AMB) Participants: Antonio Silvinato 1, Wanderley Marques Bernardo 1

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 22 July 2009

Methotrexate Injectable Step Therapy Program Summary

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 15 February 2006

Remicade. Remicade (infliximab), Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb) Description

Transcription:

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE Opinion 29 November 2006 HEXATRIONE 2% suspension for injection (intra-articular) Box containing one 2-ml vial - CIP code: 318 413-0 Applicant: SANKYO PHARMA FRANCE Triamcinolone hexacetonide List I Marketing authorisation date: December 30, 1997 Date of most recent modification of Marketing Authorisation: March 31, 2006 (extension of indication in children: juvenile idiopathic arthritis) Reason for request: Inclusion on the list of medicines reimbursed by French National Health Insurance and approved for use by hospitals in the extension of indication "juvenile idiopathic arthritis" Health Technology Assessment Division 1

1. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT 1.1. Active ingredient Triamcinolone hexacetonide 1.2. Background First local corticoid to obtain Marketing Authorisation (MA) in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. 1.3. Indications The same as those of local corticotherapy where the condition justifies a strong local concentration. All prescriptions for local injections must refer to the danger of infection, particularly the risk of encouraging bacterial proliferation. This medicinal product is indicated for intra-articular injection in rheumatological disorders: inflammatory arthritis (adult forms, juvenile idiopathic arthritis in infants aged at least one year, in children and adolescents), exacerbations of osteoarthritis. 1.4. Dosage INTRA-ARTICULAR ADMINISTRATION ONLY Anti-inflammatory equivalence (equipotency) for 5 mg of prednisolone = 4 mg of triamcinolone. Adults: from 0.5 to 2 ml of suspension depending on the size of the joint, i.e. 10 to 40 mg of triamcinolone hexacetonide without exceeding two ampoules of 40 mg. Care should be taken to ensure that the injection is sufficiently deep because of the risk of skin atrophy. Injection should only be repeated in the case of recurrence or persistence of symptoms. Infants (> 1 year), children and adolescents: Administration is reserved for practitioners with experience in the treatment of the disease. The dose must be adjusted according to the size of the joint in order to avoid any back diffusion liable to cause peri-articular calcification and skin atrophy. The usual recommended dose is 5 mg (0.25 ml) to 40 mg (2 ml) per injection. Do not exceed the dose of 40 mg per injection. Injections should only be repeated in the case of recurrence or persistence of symptoms, after a minimal period of from 3 to 6 months after the last administration. The ampoule must be shaken before use. This medicinal product is not suitable for administration by the inhaled route with a nebulizer. 2

2 SIMILAR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS 2.1. ATC classification (2005) H : Systemic hormonal preparations, excluding sex hormones and insulins 02 : Corticosteroids for systemic use A : Corticosteroids for systemic use, plain B : Glucocorticoids 08 : Triamcinolone 2.2. Medicines in the same therapeutic category Comparator medicines No other injectable corticosteroid has been granted an MA specifically for juvenile idiopathic arthritis in infants aged at least one year. However, there are other local injectable corticosteroids which are indicated for inflammatory arthritis (betamethasone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone, triamcinolone acetonide, cortivazol) without any indication as to whether they can be used in children, apart from KENACORT Retard which is contraindicated in children under three as it contains benzyl alcohol. Nevertheless, there is no absolute contraindication for corticosteroid treatment administered to preserve life. Please note that Hexatrione also contains benzyl alcohol. 2.3. Medicines with a similar therapeutic aim Other symptomatic treatments: NSAIDs and corticosteroids administered via a general route. 3 ANALYSIS OF AVAILABLE DATA 3.1. Efficacy The dossier submitted by the company for the medicinal product HEXATRIONE in the new indication "juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)" is based on bibliographical data and comprises three comparative studies and four non-comparative studies. As little clinical information is available for this paediatric condition, all the studies presented will be described despite their methodological shortcomings: Three controlled studies comparing the medicinal product with other injectable glucocorticosteroids which do not have an MA specifically for use in children: betamethasone and triamcinolone acetonide. Balogh (1988) 1 Randomised double-blind study comparing an intra-articular injection into the knee of triamcinolone hexacetonide (n=11) or betamethasone (n=12) at an unspecified fixed dose in 23 children with an oligoarticular form of JIA and an average age of 10.3 years (5-16). 1 Balogh Z. et al. Triamcinolone hexacetonide versus betamethasone. A double-blind comparative study of long-term effects of intra-articular steroids in patients with juvenile chronic arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1998 ; 67 (suppl.) : 80-2 3

The efficacy evaluation endpoint were: - The condition of the joint evaluated by measuring the circumference of the knee and the degree of flexion on D1, D3, D7 and D42 after the injection. - The patient's overall assessment of response to treatment using a four-point scale (excellent = 1, satisfactory = 2, moderate = 3, poor = 4) on D1, D7 and D42. No primary endpoint has been defined. Results Criteria Circumference of the knee (cm) Betamethasone Triamcinolone hexacetonide (n=12) (n=11) On inclusion 30.8±5.6 32.5±4.9 D 7 30.5±5.0 30.6±4.6 D42 31.8±4.6 30.8±4.2 On inclusion 130±12 131±6 Knee flexion D 7 134±11 142±8 (degree) D42 130±16 144±9 Conclusion: It is impossible to characterise the quantitative effect of triamcinolone hexacetonide in view of the methodological shortcomings of this study, in particular: The lack of a defined primary endpoint; The multiple evaluation criteria; The small population size. Zulian (2003) 2 Open-label comparative study of triamcinolone hexacetonide and triamcinolone acetonide (Kenacort retard ) in 85 patients with an average age of 5 years suffering from an oligoarticular form of JIA. A total of 130 joints were treated with an injection of either triamcinolone hexacetonide (70 injections) or triamcinolone acetonide (60 injections) at a dose of 1 mg/kg (maximum dose: 40 mg) in line with treatment availability. The primary endpoint was the articular score assessed 6, 12 and 24 months after the injection. The study also evaluated: - The proportion of patients who responded in a satisfactory manner, defined by absence of signs of synovitis or a fall of at least 60% in the articular score, - The relapse rate. 2 Zulian F et al. Comparison of intra-articular triamcinolone hexacetonide and triamcinolone acetonide in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatol 2003 ; 42 : 1254-9 4

Results - No data on change of the articular score (principal criterion) are available. - Triamcinolone hexacetonide performed better than triamcinolone acetonide when judged by the satisfactory response rate after 6, 12 and 24 months. Satisfactory Triamcinolone Triamcinolone difference response rate at hexacetonide acetonide 6 months 81.4% 53.3% p = 0.001 12 months 67.1% 43.3% p = 0.006 24 months 60% 33.3% p = 0.002 - The relapse risk was higher in the group treated with triamcinolone acetonide than in the group treated with triamcinolone hexacetonide (RR: 2.5 [1.4-4.4] at 6 months, 1.7 [1.2-2.6] at 12 months and 1.7 [1.2-2.3] at 24 months). Zulian F.Italy (2004) 3 Randomised, double-blind study comparing triamcinolone hexacetonide and triamcinolone acetonide in 37 children with an average age of 4.9 years (1.1-14.8), 32 of whom were suffering from an oligoarticular form of JIA and five of whom had a polyarticular form of the condition. A total of eighty-six joints were treated either with triamcinolone hexacetonide (43 injections) at a dose of 1 mg/kg (maximum dose: 40 mg) or triamcinolone acetonide (43 injections) at a dose of 2 mg/kg (maximum dose: 80 mg). The primary endpoint was the articular score assessed 6, 12 and 24 months after the injection. The study also evaluated: - The proportion of patients who responded in a satisfactory manner, defined by absence of signs of synovitis or a fall of at least 60% in the articular score, - The relapse rate. Results: - The change of the articular score (principal criterion) was not specified. - The satisfactory relapse rate was higher in the triamcinolone hexacetonide group at 6, 12 and 24 months. Satisfactory response triamcinolone triamcinolone acetonide difference rate at hexacetonide 6 months 89.7% 61.5% p = 0.008 12 months 84.6% 48.7% p = 0.001 24 months 76.9% 38.5% p = 0.001 - The relapse rate after a monitoring period of two to twenty-four months was 15.4% in the triamcinolone hexacetonide group versus 53.8% in the triamcinolone acetonide group. Four non-comparative prospective studies published between 1986 and 2002 - Allen (1986), Earley (1987), Padey (1998) and Neidel (2002), conducted on a total of 219 children and summarised in the table below, suggest that triamcinolone hexacetonide is effective in the treatment of JIA. 3 Zulian F et al. Triamcinolone acetonide and hexacetonide intra-articular treatment of symmetrical joints in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a double-blind trial. Rheumatol 2004 ; 43 : 1288-91 5

Other data: A retrospective subgroup analysis conducted by BREIT et al, 2000 4 on a series of 194 children (average age not specified) suffering from all forms of JIA (oligoarthritis in 60% of the cases) treated between 1989 and 1994 suggests that triamcinolone hexacetonide is effective for all forms of JIA. Furthermore, this subgroup analysis shows that improvement lasts longer in oligoarticular forms (121 weeks) and forms of polyarthritis without rheumatoid factors (105 weeks) than in forms of polyarthritis with rheumatoid factors (63 weeks), forms of spondylarthropathy (47 weeks) and systemic forms (36 weeks). 3.2. Adverse effects The adverse effects most frequently reported in the studies were similar to those reported for adults: subcutaneous atrophy and joint calcifications. These are known adverse events associated with corticosteroids administered by injection. However, three cases of femoral head necrosis were reported in the clinical studies performed by NEIDEL (2 cases) and BREIT (1 case) in patients who were also receiving corticosteroid treatment by a general route at the same time. The outcome of these cases was not documented. 3.3. Conclusion The efficacy of triamcinolone hexacetonide in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, particularly the oligoarticular form (over 60% of cases) is based on eight clinical studies published between 1986 and 2004 and conducted on a total of 558 children who were monitored for 6 months to 24 months. Three of these studies compared the product with another glucocorticosteroid: betamethasone or triamcinolone acetonide. In Balogh's study, conducted on a small population (23 children), triamcinolone hexacetonide administered at a non-specified dose was superior to betamethasone (dose not specified) for the following criteria: circumference of the knee, degree of flexion and the patient's overall assessment of the effect of treatment. In the two studies conducted by Zulian, no conclusion can be drawn from a comparison of 1 mg/kg of triamcinolone hexacetonide with 1 mg/kg or 2 mg/kg of triamcinolone acetonide as no results on the primary endpoint (articular score) are available. The tolerance profile of this medicinal product in children was similar to that reported in adults. The most frequent adverse events were subcutaneous atrophy and joint calcification, but three cases of femoral head necrosis were reported in patients also receiving corticosteroid treatment by a general route at the same time. 4 Breit W et al. A subgroup-specific evaluation of the efficacy of intraarticular triamcinolone hexacetonide in juvenile chronic arthritis. J Rheumatol 2000; 27(11) : 2696-702 6

Experts regard HEXATRIONE as the standard local treatment for juvenile idiopathic arthritis in view of its longer duration of action. According to the experts, there is currently no better alternative in the same class. 7

Non-comparative prospective studies Allen RC. 5 Canada (1986) Study Methodology Followup Prospective uncontrolled Population 2 years 40 (31 girls and 9 boys) Average age not specified but < 16 years Diagnosis and inclusion criteria JIA according to ARA: oligoarticular (29) PR (6) seronegative polyarthritis (4) ankylosing spondylarthritis (1) Treatment (dose and route of administration) 1 injection of TH in the knee (20 to 40 mg) Evaluation criteria * Rate of response to treatment * Rate of relapse * Time to relapse Evaluation at 6, 12 and 24 months Results (efficacy) * Rate of response - oligoarticular form 67.6% at 6 months and 50% at 1 year - other clinical forms 50% at 6 months and 30% at 1 year * Rate of relapse 8 knees were treated twice (5 favourable responses); 2 knees were treated three times and one knee was treated four times with a further relapse. Earley A. 6 UK (1988) Padeh S. 7 Israel (1998) Neidel J. 8 Germany (2002) Prospective uncontrolled Prospective uncontrolled Prospective uncontrolled 1 year 60 (36 girls and 24 boys) Average age: 4.5 years [1.4-10] 5 years 71 (47 girls and 24 boys) Average age: 9.4 years [0.5-18] 2 years 48 (30 girls and 18 boys) Average age: 10 years [2-17] JIA: oligoarthritis of the knee Juvenile chronic arthritis according to ACR: all forms (including 43 oligoarticular) after failure of NSAID administered for 6 to 8 weeks Juvenile chronic arthritis according to ACR: coxitis 1 injection of TH in the knee (20 mg if weight < 20 kg and 40 mg if weight > 20 kg) 1 injection of intraarticular TH (10 to 40 mg depending on the size of the joint). 1 injection (follow-up) of TH in the hip (1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 40 mg) Overall assessment of the response by the physician Evaluation at 3, 6 and 12 months * Good response = disappearance of synovitis in the first week and no relapse at 6 months * Failure = relapse within 6 months Evaluation at 6 and 36 months Clinical remission of synovitis confirmed by echography and MRI after two years. * Overall assessment at 1 year: good to excellent results in 77% of cases and * 11 knees were re-injected (two were reinjected three times within 1 year). * 82% remission rate at 6 months (246/300 injections) * 38 children had only one injection; 18 children had two injections and 9 children had three injections at six-month intervals. 6 children had more than three injections. * 76% remission of coxitis * 58% remission of coxitis with a single injection in the two years of the study (39/67). JIA: juvenile idiopathic arthritis, ACR: American College of Rheumatology, TH: triamcinolone hexacetonide, PR: psoriatic rheumatism, ARA: American Rheumatism Association 5 Allen RC et al. Intraarticular triamcinolone hexacetonide in the management of chronic arthritis in children. Arthritis Rheum 1986 ; 29(8) : 997-1001 6 Earley A. el al. Triamcinolone into the knee joint in juvenile chronic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1988 ; 6 : 153-5 7 Padeh S et al. Intraarticular corticosteroid injection in the management of children with chronic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1998 ; 41(7) : 1210-4 8 Neidel J et al. The efficacy and safety of intraarticular corticosteroid therapy for coxitis in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2002 ; 46(2) : 1620-8 8

4 TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE CONCLUSIONS 4.1. Actual benefit Juvenile idiopathic arthritis designates all articular inflammatory conditions with no known cause that start before the age of 16 and last for more than 6 weeks 9. These are serious and disabling chronic conditions. This medicine is intended as symptomatic therapy. Public health benefit: The burden on public health caused by juvenile idiopathic arthritis is small because of the small number of patients affected (orphan condition). Improving pain control (GTNDO 10 pain) for this orphan disease ("rare diseases" plan) is an integral part of public health priorities. The available data is insufficient to quantify the population impact of HEXATRIONE. However, the professional consensus that this is a better standard local treatment than other local treatments indicates that this medicinal product is likely to have a slight impact on the morbidity and quality of life of patients who undergo treatment. HEXATRIONE is part of the response to the identified need to improve pain control in this orphan pathology of juvenile arthritis. Therefore, the medicinal product HEXATRIONE has a public health benefit for this indication given the current state of knowledge. This interest is minor. The efficacy/safety ratio for this medicinal product is high. It is a second-line treatment after anti-inflammatories administered by the general route and/or drugs treating an underlying condition have failed. There is no local therapeutic alternative with an MA specifically for children. The actual benefit for this indication is substantial. 4.2. Improvement in actual benefit In the indication "juvenile idiopathic arthritis in infants aged at least one year, in children and in adolescents", HEXATRIONE provides a moderate (IAB III) improvement in actual benefit in the strategy of addressing this condition. 9, 11,12 4.3. Therapeutic use The aim of the treatment is to combat inflammation, relieve pain and stiffness and prevent or slow down articular lesions. 9 Job deslandre et al. Arthrites juvéniles idiopathiques [Forms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis]. Encyclopédie orphanet. September 2003. 10 GTNDO is the national technical objective definition group 11 Hull RG; British Paediatric Rheumatology Group. Guidelines for management of childhood arthritis. Rheumatology 2001 ; 40 (11) : 1309-12 12 Hashkes PJ, Laxer RM. Medical treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. JAMA 2005 ; 294(13) : 1671-84 9

It makes use of fast-acting symptomatic treatments (NSAIDs, corticosteroids) and sometimes long-term treatments (particularly methotrexate or etanercept in patients who do not respond to methotrexate) depending on the form which the juvenile idiopathic arthritis takes (systemic, oligoarticular or polyarticular). NSAIDs are usually the first-line treatment, but they are not always effective. Experts believe that HEXATRIONE is an essential medicinal product in the control of juvenile idiopathic arthritis because of its long duration of action, especially for local treatment of oligoarticular forms, which are the most common clinical form of the condition, but also for polyarticular forms, as a complement to other treatments (particularly long term). The recommended dose is 0.5 to 1 mg/kg/joint depending on the size of the joint. Further doses should only be injected if the symptoms reappear or persist, leaving at least three to six months between injections. 4.4. Target population It is thought that around 3,000 children under 16 in France suffer from juvenile idiopathic arthritis 13,14. Experts believe that around one third of these patients will undergo at least one corticosteroid injection in childhood, giving a target population for HEXATRIONE of 1,000 patients. 4.5. Transparency Committee recommendations The Transparency Committee recommends inclusion on the list of medicines reimbursed by National Insurance and on the list of medicines approved for use by hospitals and various public services in the new indication and at the posology in the marketing authorisation. 4.5.1 Packaging: Appropriate for the prescription conditions 4.5.2 Reimbursement rate: 65% 13 PRIEUR AM. Prise en charge des enfants atteints de rhumatismes chroniques. Similitudes et différences avec la polyarthrite rhumatoïde. [Treating children with chronic rheumatism. Similarities and differences compared to rheumatoid polyarthritis] Revue du rhumatisme 1990 ; 57 :280-286. 14 Job deslandre et al. Arthrites juvéniles idiopathiques. [Forms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis] Encyclopédie orphanet. Septembre 2003. 10