West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

Similar documents
West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County

Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Position Statement

SHASTA COUNTY Health and Human Services Agency

Clinical Information on West Nile Virus (WNV) Infection

Mosquitoborne Viral Diseases

Arboviral Surveillance and Control Annual Report: Pennsylvania, 2014

Case Classification West Nile Virus Neurological Syndrome (WNNS)

West Nile virus and other arboviral activity -- United States, 2013 Provisional data reported to ArboNET Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Thomas McGee, L.C. 920 Main Street, Suite 1700 Kansas City, MO (816) * Toll Free (800) WEST NILE VIRUS

Appendix I (a) Human Surveillance Case Definition (Revised July 4, 2005)

Evaluation of the West Nile Surveillance System for the State of Kansas

WEST NILE VIRUS SURVEILLANCE IN MADISON AND DANE COUNTY

TREATING THE REHAB PATIENT WITH WEST NILE VIRUS. Amy J. Wilson MD Medical Director, Baylor Institution of Rehabilitation January 2014

West Nile Virus Los Angeles County

West Nile Virus. Syndrome. (Family: Flaviviridae) Severe Manifestations (Typically >50 years of age) NEUROLOGICAL (Meningoencephalitis >Meningitis)

Epidemiological Profile of West Nile Virus in Kent County, Michigan

Protecting You and Your Community from West Nile Virus. Eagle County Environmental Health Department

West Nile virus and other arboviral activity -- United States, 2013 Provisional data reported to ArboNET Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Appendix B: Provincial Case Definitions for Reportable Diseases

West Nile Virus. Lyle R. Petersen, M.D., M.P.H.

West Nile Virus. Lyndon Badcoe PhD Epidemiologist

Endemic Human Mosquito-borne Disease in Wisconsin Residents,

West Nile Virus. Family: Flaviviridae

NEBRASKA ARBOVIRUS SURVEILLANCE AND MOSQUITO MONITORING PROGRAM 2018 UPDATE #2

Outbreak Investigation Guidance for Vectorborne Diseases

West Nile virus and other arboviral activity -- United States, 2014 Provisional data reported to ArboNET Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Arboviruses in Florida. Carina Blackmore, DVM, PhD Florida Department of Health Bureau of Environmental Public Health Medicine

Using administrative medical claims data to estimate underreporting of infectious zoonotic diseases

Mosquito Control Update. Board of County Commissioners Work Session February 16, 2016

West Nile Virus and West Nile Encephalitis Frequently Asked Questions

West Nile Fever. F. Karup Pedersen 2012

Arbovirus Surveillance in Massachusetts 2016 Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) Arbovirus Surveillance Program

West Nile virus and other arboviral activity -- United States, 2016 Provisional data reported to ArboNET Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Controlling Urban Epidemics of West Nile Virus Infection

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2017: September 2

Geographic distribution ZIKV

West Nile Virus Program Final Report West Nile Virus. Mosquito BIle ProI8ctIon. .~...aodllogll""",,~-,iiiciuciiif~_8fici""""""

Outbreak of West Nile Virus in Southern France in 2003

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2018: For week ending July 7

West Nile Virus. By Frank Riusech

West Nile Virus in the Region of Peel 2002

Fight The Bite. Michelle Cole Auburn University Outreach Director

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2018: June 23

West Nile Virus Activity in Harris County, Texas Rudy Bueno, Jr., Ph.D. Division Director, HCPHES Mosquito Control

JAPANESE ENCEPHALITIS (J.E.)

Disease Carrying Insects

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Zika virus disease

EPIDEMIOLOGY SURVEILLANCE REPORT Northeast Region. Namitha Reddy Regional Coordinator North/Central West Region

West Nile Virus Surveillance Report, 2017: August 19

Tickborne Disease Case Investigations

West Nile Virus Surveillance in mosquito vectors (Culex pipiens)

Manitoba Weekly West Nile virus Surveillance Report

INJURY OR DEATH FROM WEST NILE, ZIKA OR OTHER VIRUSES VECTORED BY MOSQUITOES

Of Mice, Men and Mosquitoes

Mosquito Control Matters

Analysis of West Nile Virus in Franklin County, Pennsylvania

Dilemmas in the Management of Meningitis & Encephalitis HEADACHE AND FEVER. What is the best initial approach for fever, headache, meningisums?

Emerging vector-borne diseases in the United States: What s next and are we prepared?

Dallas County Health and Human Services Arbovirus Surveillance Report Week 39 ending September 29, 2018

City of Arlington West Nile Virus Response Plan 2013

GUESTS IN ATTENDANCE: Mr. Douglas Coover, Harrison Hospital; Mr. Gerry Morrow, Reporter, KMAS radio

Mosquito Threats in LA County West Nile virus & Zika

HUMAN DISEASE CAUSING VIRUSES VECTORED BY MOSQUITOES

Flu Watch. MMWR Week 3: January 14 to January 20, and Deaths. Virologic Surveillance. Influenza-Like Illness Surveillance

Vector-Borne Diseases Update: Maricopa County

Dengue Fever & Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever Annual Reports to WHO

Coccidioidomycosis, aka Valley Fever

Flu Watch. MMWR Week 4: January 21 to January 27, and Deaths. Virologic Surveillance. Influenza-Like Illness Surveillance

2015 Mosquito Abatement Plan QUALITY OF LIFE & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MARCH 23, 2015

EPIDEMIOLOGY SURVEILLANCE REPORT NORTHEAST REGION FALL Namitha Reddy Regional Coordinator North/Central West Region NJDOH/EEOH/CDS

Risk Factors for West Nile Virus Infection During an Outbreak Arizona, 2010

Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture. Edward G. Rendell, Governor Dennis C Wolff, Secretary

Drought and Public Health

Tick-borne Disease Surveillance

Chatham County WNV Outbreak, What the heck are they doing down there? Robert A. Moulis Pamela T. Thompson Chatham County Mosquito Control

First Probable West Nile Virus Case in the Simcoe-Muskoka Area

An Introduction to Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya Viruses

Zika Virus. Lee Green Vector-Borne Epidemiologist Indiana State Department of Health. April 13, 2016

Durham Region Influenza Bulletin: 2017/18 Influenza Season

Zika. Nicole Evert, MS Zoonosis Control Branch Department of State Health Services Austin, Texas

WASHOE ADVISORY BALLOT QUESTION NO. 1

Influenza Season and EV-D68 Update. Johnathan Ledbetter, MPH

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Arbovirus Infections and the animal reservoir

Epidemiology of Lassa Fever

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and Avian Influenza A (H7N9) update

DENGUE AND BLOOD SAFETY. Ester C Sabino, MD, PhD Dep. of Infectious Disease/Institute of Tropical Medicine University of São Paulo

ZIKA VIRUS. John J. Russell MD May 27, 2016

Routine NAT-screening for West Nile Virus Infections in Germany: Being prepared

Public Health Image Library. CDC/ Cynthia Goldsmith. Image #

Massachusetts Arbovirus Surveillance and Response Plan

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES WITH GLOBAL IMPACT

Measles: United States, January 1 through June 10, 2011

Selassie AW (DPHS, MUSC) 1

Annual Epidemiological Report

State of Oregon West Nile Virus Summary Report

INFLUENZA Surveillance Report Influenza Season

Zika Virus: The Olympics and Beyond

Transcription:

West Nile Virus in Maricopa County A Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito on a human finger. Image by James Gathany/ CDC gov/ public domain Maricopa County Department of Public Health Office of Epidemiology July 1 January 1, 11 December 31, 11 1

Commentary West Nile virus (WNV) is a mosquito-borne virus that causes a non-specific, selflimited, febrile illness. Mosquitoes become infected when they feed on infected birds that have migrated into an area. The mosquitoes then bite people who may or may not become infected. The cycle of WNV occurs at an unusually high intensity when there is both a large number of infected birds and a high concentration of infected mosquitoes in a relatively small geographic area. Mosquitoes are the known carriers (vectors) of the virus from the host birds to humans. Humans and animals (i.e., horses) are incidental hosts in this bird-mosquito cycle, and thus cannot pass the virus to others. Because WNV causes death in birds, we expect dead birds to be the first warning of WNV activity in an area. WNV is widespread in Africa, North America, Europe, the Middle East, India, Southeast Asia, Australia, the Caribbean and Central and South America. Although it is now widespread in the United States, WNV was not present in Arizona until 3. WNV is now endemic in Maricopa County and is expected to be a public health concern indefinitely. WNV surveillance season begins April 1st and ends November 3th, however, in Arizona the majority of cases occur between the months of June and October, with cases as early as January and as late as November. All residents and visitors are urged to continue to take precautions against WNV infection every year. The Maricopa County Department of Public Health (MCDPH) and the Maricopa County Department of Environmental Services (MCDES) work closely to educate and protect the residents of Maricopa County against WNV. MCDES has an extensive mosquito-trapping program that enables staff to identify areas where there is a lot of mosquito activity and to detect mosquito-borne diseases. Various types of mosquito traps are set up throughout the county that collects mosquitoes for testing. These mosquitoes are pooled together, by species, into groups of 1-5 mosquitoes. This collection of mosquitoes is called a mosquito pool. The mosquitoes are then ground up and tested for WNV and other mosquito-borne diseases. MCDES responds to complaints regarding green (unattended) swimming pools, stagnant water, dead birds, and mosquitoes. MCDPH is responsible for monitoring the interaction of the virus with humans. Working with hospitals and medical providers throughout the county, MCDPH conducts disease surveillance to find hot spots in the Valley where there are a particularly high number of people with WNV. MCDPH nurses and epidemiologists monitor patients with potential

WNV symptoms who seek medical care, monitor disease patterns in order to stop transmission of the virus, and assist the public by giving recommendations for controlling the spread of or exposure to WNV in different settings. The majority (~8%) of people infected with WNV will show no symptoms at all. For those that are symptomatic (~%), symptoms will appear -14 days after receiving the mosquito bite. Symptomatic cases are characterized by the acute onset of fever, headache, arthralgias, myalgias, and sometimes accompanied by a maculopapular rash or lymphadenopathy. Rarely do symptoms get more severe; however, 1-3% of symptomatic infections will develop into a neuroinvasive form of the disease. In neuroinvasive West Nile Virus, the central nervous system (CNS) is involved and clinical syndromes ranging from meningitis (inflammation of the lining of the brain and spinal cord) to encephalitis (inflammation of the brain), or acute paralysis can occur. There is no treatment for WNV; only supportive care can be given. Between January 1, 11 and December 31, 11, the MCDPH received reports of 5 residents infected with WNV, 45 of whom developed symptoms, and 5 of whom had no symptoms 1. Two of the symptomatic individuals died from the disease. Because WNV neuroinvasive disease cases are more severe, they are considered to be more consistently detected and reported than non-neuroinvasive disease cases. Of the 45 symptomatic individuals in 11, 31 (9%) had neuroinvasive illness. It has been estimated that for every case of WNV neuroinvasive disease detected, approximately 14 infections occur. Using this method, it can be estimated that there were 4,34 infections and 88 non-neuroinvasive disease cases in residents of Maricopa County in 11. In contrast to the unusual focal outbreak of WNV that occurred early in the East Valley of Maricopa County in 1, the 11 season returned to the usual disease pattern, with low numbers of WNV cases reported in residents valley-wide. The reasons for the outbreak in 1 or for the return to near baseline endemic levels in 11 are not well understood and are being investigated. The following pages summarize the incidence of WNV cases in humans by age, gender, case classification and by city of residence. In addition, WNV surveillance indicators and mosquito pools are also summarized. 1 WNV detected through screening of blood donors 3

Human Cases Figure 1. WNV Cases in Humans in Maricopa County by Month of Onset, -11 45 4 35 (n=75) 7 (n=8) 8 (n=91) 9 (n=19) 1 (n=115) 11 (n=45) 3 5 15 1 5 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month 4

Figure. WNV Cases in Humans and WNV Positive Mosquito Pools in Maricopa County by Month, 11 Human Cases 1 18 1 14 1 1 8 4 Human Cases (n=45) Mosquito pools (n=95) 4 35 3 5 15 1 5 WNV Positive Mosquito Pools Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Month 3 1 A human case is an individual infected with WNV and with a clinically compatible illness. Mosquito pools are a collection of mosquitoes that have been collected from a county trap that are pooled together, by species, into groups of 1-5 mosquitoes and then ground up and tested for WNV. 3 Human data are based on the date of symptom onset. Mosquito data are based on date specimen was collected. Since WNV has an incubation period ranging from -14 days, it is expected that there will be a lag between mosquito and human case onsets; however this was not the case in 11. 5

Figure 3. West Nile Virus Surveillance Indicators: Dates of First Positive Findings in a Mosquito Pool and Onset in a Human in Maricopa County, 11 1/1/11 Mosquito /3/11 Equine January February March April May June July August September October November December 5//11 Human

Table 1. West Nile Virus Cases in Maricopa County by Gender and Case Classification, 11 WNV Cases Case Classification 1 Male Female Total % of Total Cases Meningitis 8 8 1 3 Encephalitis 8 5 13 9 Paralysis Syndrome 4 Neuroinvasive Disease Total 18 13 31 9 Fever 8 5 13 9 Fever in Viremic Donors 1 1 Non-Neuroinvasive Total 8 14 31 Total 19 45 1 Viremic Donors Asymptomatic 4 1 5-1 Case Classification may differ from the numbers reported by Arizona Department of Health Services. Fever in a viremic donor cases are included in fever cases throughout the rest of this report. Case Classifications: The Maricopa County Department of Public Health uses the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention s (CDC) case definition to confirm a case of West Nile virus. A case of WNV is a clinically compatible illness that is West Nile virus laboratory confirmed. WNV infection can be asymptomatic or result in a febrile illness of variable severity sometimes associated with CNS involvement. Cases of WNV are classified either as neuroinvasive or non-neuroinvasive, which are explained below: Non-Neuroinvasive West Nile Virus: Requires, at minimum, the presence of documented fever, as measured by the patient or clinician, the absence of neuroinvasive disease, and the absence of a more likely clinical explanation for the illness. o Fever: A non-localized, self-limited febrile illness characterized by the acute onset of fever, headache, arthralgias, myalgias, and sometimes accompanied by a maculopapular rash or lymphadenopathy. 7

Neuroinvasive West Nile Virus: Requires the presence of fever, the absence of a more likely clinical explanation for the illness, and at least one of the following documented by a physician: 1. Acutely altered mental status (e.g., disorientation, obtundation, stupor, or coma). Acute signs of central or peripheral neurologic dysfunction (e.g., paresis or paralysis, nerve palsies, sensory deficits, abnormal reflexes, generalized convulsions, or abnormal movements) 3. Pleocytosis (increased white blood cell concentration in cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) associated with illness clinically compatible with meningitis (e.g., headache or stiff neck) Neuroinvasive cases are classified using the following categories: o Meningitis: WNV meningitis is characterized by fever, headache, stiff neck, and pleocytosis. o Encephalitis: WNV encephalitis is characterized by fever, headache, and altered mental status ranging from confusion to coma with or without additional signs of brain dysfunction (e.g., paresis or paralysis, cranial nerve palsies, sensory deficits, abnormal reflexes, generalized convulsions, and abnormal movements). o Paralysis syndrome: No CDC case definition for this syndrome exists at the present time. The criteria applied to Maricopa County cases are: Laboratory confirmed acute WNV-infection; AND Physician documented acute paralysis. Viremic Donor: The CDC defines a WNV positive viremic donor as a person who donated blood and had a positive test when screened for the presence of West Nile virus. Viremic donors are followed up by the blood agency to verify their infection with additional tests. Some viremic donors will remain asymptomatic, but others will go on to develop symptoms. 8

o Asymptomatic Viremic Donor: Viremic donors who do not become symptomatic are not included in case numbers. The criteria applied to Maricopa County cases are: Laboratory confirmed acute WNV-infection; AND No report of symptoms. o Symptomatic Viremic Donor: Once the symptoms are reviewed, the case will be classified as a confirmed case of viremic donor encephalitis, viremic donor meningitis, viremic donor paralysis syndrome, or viremic donor fever. The criteria applied to Maricopa County cases are: Laboratory confirmed acute WNV-infection; AND A report of symptoms compatible with West Nile fever, meningitis, encephalitis, or paralysis syndrome (see above definitions). For more information visit: CDC Arboviral Diseases, Neuroinvasive and Non-Neuroinvasive 11 Case Definition: http://www.cdc.gov/osels/ph_surveillance/nndss/casedef/arboviral_current.htm Arizona Department of Health Services Case Definitions for Reportable Communicable Morbidities: http://www.azdhs.gov/phs/oids/pdf/casedefinitions.pdf 9

Number of Cases Figure 4. West Nile Virus Cases in Maricopa County by Gender and Case Classification, 11 (n=45) 18 1 1 Female Male 14 1 13 14 1 8 4 Meningitis Encephalitis Paralysis Syndrome Fever Case Classification 1

Number of Cases Figure 5. West Nile Virus Cases in Maricopa County by Case Classification, - 11 14 Non-neuroinvasive 1 Neuroinvasive 1 8 4 7 8 9 1 11 Year 11

Number of deaths Table. Mean, Median, and Range of Ages of West Nile Virus Deaths and Survivors in Maricopa County, 11 Mean Age Median Age Age Range Died (n=) 81.5 81.5 81-8 Survived (n=3) 58.8 57 9-85 Total (n=45) 58 9-85 Mean age of West Nile virus survivors vs. deaths was significantly different, p<.5 Figure. West Nile Virus Deaths in Maricopa County by Gender, -11 (n=3) 14 1 Female (n=8) Male (n= ) 1 1 8 4 4 7 8 9 1 11 Year 1

Number of Cases Table 3. Mean, Median, and Range of Ages of West Nile Virus Cases in Maricopa County, 11 (n=45) Mean Age Median Age Age Range Neuroinvasive 1 (n=31). 58 9-85 Non-Neuroinvasive (n=14) 58.7 57.5 38-77 Total (n=45) 58 9-85 1 Mean age of West Nile virus neuroinvasive cases vs. non-neuroinvasive cases was not significantly different, p >.5 Figure 7. West Nile Virus Cases in Maricopa County by Age and Case Classification, 11 (n=45) 14 1 13 Non-Neuroinvasive (n=14) Neuroinvasive (n=31) 1 8 8 7 8 4 1-9 3-39 4-49 5-59 -9 7-79 8-89 Age (Years) 13

Mean Age Figure 8. Mean Ages in Years of West Nile Virus Cases in Maricopa County by Case Classification, -11 7 58. 5.4 Non-Neuroinvasive Neuroinvasive 58.5 59.3 53.8 54.4 58.7. 5 5.1 48 48.8 49.9 4 3 1 7 8 9 1 11 Year 14

Figure 9. Rates of West Nile Virus in Maricopa County by City, 11 Total Tempe 1.8 1. Scottsdale 1.81 Phoenix.95 City 1 Peoria Mesa.45 1.8 Glendale 1.3 Gilbert.3 Chandler 3.33 Buckeye 1.94.5 1 1.5.5 3 3.5 Rate per 1, 1 Population statistics for each city were obtained from United States Census Bureau 11 population estimates. Rate per 1, population = (N/population) * 1,. 15

Figure 1. Rates of West Nile Virus in Maricopa County by City 1, -11 4 1 14 Rate per 1, Population 1 1 8 4 7 8 9 1 11 Chandler Glendale Gilbert Mesa Peoria Phoenix Scottsdale Tempe Total* City 3 1 Rates shown for the top 8 cities by population in Maricopa County. Rate per 1, population = (N/population) * 1,. 3 Population statistics for each city were obtained from United States Census Bureau, 7, 8, 9, and 11 estimates and from the 1 Census. 4 In 1 there was an East Valley outbreak. * Total includes cities displayed in figure, as well as other cities and unincorporated areas with <5 cases. 1