Risk and Protective Factors for Youth Marijuana Use: Preliminary Findings

Similar documents
RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS ANALYSIS

Community Assessment Training

2014 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. South Florida Behavioral Health Network

2014 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. Santa Rosa County

Slide 1. Indiana Prevention Resource Center

2014 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. Central Florida Behavioral Health Network

2012 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. Miami-Dade County

2014 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. Escambia County

2016 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. Flagler County

Validity of the Risk & Protective Factor Model

COMMUNITY-LEVEL EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUAL AND PEER RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS ON ADOLESCENT SUBSTANCE USE

Youth Survey S Project y Project Sample State Bach

2012 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

Outcomes on a Statewide Prevention Model to Reduce Youth Substance Use: Evaluation of Washington State s Community Prevention and Wellness Initiative

Appendix D The Social Development Strategy

2014 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2016 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2016 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

Health Risk and Protective Framework, Health Belief Model, Alternate Smoking Devices (ASD), Substance Abuse, Tobacco Prevention and Control

Sevier County Profile Report

Dallas County County Profile Report

Arkansas Prevention Needs Assessment Survey

Arkansas Prevention Needs Assessment Survey

Conducted by International Survey Associates dba Pride Surveys

Conducted by International Survey Associates dba Pride Surveys

Title of Poster: Gambling and Other Problem Behaviors Among Nebraska Youth. Results of the Risk and Protective Factor Survey ( ).

Conducted by International Survey Associates dba Pride Surveys

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

Bach Harrison Youth Survey Results for 2006

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

Arkansas Prevention Needs Assessment Survey

Arkansas Prevention Needs Assessment Survey

Arkansas Prevention Needs Assessment Survey

2002 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

The 2010 Wyoming Prevention Needs Assessment: State of Wyoming Profile Report

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2002 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

How Well Do You Know Tompkins County Youth?

2002 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

APNA. Arkansas Prevention Needs Assessment Student Survey

Arizona Gambling Profile Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Collier County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Levy County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Saint Johns County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Liberty County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Miami-Dade County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Marion County Report

Risk and Protective Factors: The Intersection of Substance Abuse and Gambling Prevention

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Broward County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Polk County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Monroe County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. District 3 Report

THE RELATION BETWEEN RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS FOR PROBLEM BEHAVIORS AND DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS, ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR, AND ALCOHOL USE IN ADOLESCENCE

Richard F. Catalano, Ph.D Bartley Dobb Professor for the Study and Prevention of Violence

Alcohol & Tobacco Use Among Monteverde Youth

Apache County REPORT PROVIDED BY:

2016 Prevention Needs Assessment Survey

KEARNS EVIDENCE2SUCCESS COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT REPORT

Community Kick-off Event. August 3, 2017

Scotts Bluff County. Results for Profile Report: Nebraska Risk and Protective Factor Student Survey

---- Suburb. Analysis by Locale Code Profile Report

Healthy Youth Survey 2014

Student Risk and Protective Factor Survey

Julia Dilley, PhD Oregon Health Authority, Public Health Division & Multnomah County Health Dept.

Initiation of Smoking and Other Addictive Behaviors: Understanding the Process

Panhandle Public Health Department

Local/Other Data (**) Concern about Risk or Protective Factor (bold) Special Concern (Cowlitz v. State Average) COMMUNITY DOMAIN RISK FACTORS.

2017 Massachusetts Prevention Needs Assessment Survey Printed August 30th 2017

Alpine School District. Profile Report

Impacts of Early Exposure to Work on Smoking Initiation Among Adolescents and Older Adults: the ADD Health Survey. David J.

Jefferson County. Results for Profile Report: Nebraska Risk and Protective Factor Student Survey

Dawes County. Results for Profile Report: Nebraska Risk and Protective Factor Student Survey

2015 New York Prevention Needs Assessment Survey

XYZ County Schools LifeSkills Training (LST) Program Student Survey Results for the School Year

2012 Arizona Youth Survey. City of Chandler, AZ

ATTITUDES ABOUT DRUGS AND THE DRUG USE OF INDIAN YOUTH

HealthyYouthSurveyFactShets

HealthyYouthSurveyFactShets

2014 Virginia Prevention Needs Assessment Survey Survey Results for: Chesterfield County

City of Tucson, AZ REPORT PROVIDED BY:

Residential Positive Achievement Change Tool (R-PACT) Validation Study

What is the Evidence Base for Prevention in Adolescence?

Risk and Protective Factors for Adolescent Drug Use:

Transcription:

Risk and Protective Factors for Youth Marijuana Use: Preliminary Findings Analysis from the July 10, 2013 1

Purpose Examine youth marijuana use prevalence and frequency Identify the most salient risk and protective factors of youth marijuana use and frequent use Provide recommendation for marijuana prevention strategies 2

Past 30-Day Marijuana Use In, one out of five Washington State 10th graders reported using marijuana in the past 30 days. Q. Smoked marijuana/hashish during the past 30 days? Percent of students Year 10 th Grade Marijuana Use 2002 18.3% 2004 17.1% 2006 18.3% 2008 19.1% 2010 20.0% 19.3% SOURCE: Washington State Healthy Youth Survey, 3

Frequency of Marijuana Use In the Past Month 4

Methodology Logistic Regression Outcome variables Any use in past 30 days Frequent use in past 30 days (10 or more days) Risk and protective factors Stage one: early developmental stage factors family factors and academic failure Stage two: all risk and protective factors family, school, community, peer and individual Separate models for 6 th (subset available on form C), 8 th, and 10 th graders 5

Any Marijuana Use Early Developmental Stage Risk/Protective Factors Risk/Protective Factor Scales Poor family management Parents attitudes favorable towards drug use Opportunities for prosocial involvement (family) Rewards for pro-social involvement (family) 6 th Grade 8 th Grade 10 th Grade OR* 95% CI of OR* OR 95% CI of OR OR 95% CI of OR 2.8 2.1 3.8 2.8 2.2 3.5 5.0 3.8 6.6 4.1 3.3 5.1 0.8 0.6 1.3 0.8 0.7 1.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.5 1.0 0.9 0.7 1.1 Academic failure 1.3 0.9 2.1 1.8 1.3 2.4 1.9 1.5 2.4 NOTES: *OR= Odds Ratio. The table shows the upper and lower bounds of the odd ratios. Adjusted for race (white vs. non-white), ethnicity, parental education level (college vs. no college), and rural/urban distinctions for 8th and 10th graders. Adjusted for race, ethnicity, and rural/urban distinction for 6th graders because parents education was not asked on the 6th grade form. Significant factor scales are highlighted. 6

Any Marijuana Use All Risk/Protective Factors Risk/Protective Factor Scale 6 th Grade 8 th Grade 10 th Grade OR* 95% CI of OR* OR 95% CI of OR OR 95% CI of OR Laws and norms favorable to drug use Community Factors 2.0 1.1 3.8 1.3 0.9 1.8 0.8 0.5 1.2 Perceived availability of drugs 4.1 2.1 8.0 1.9 1.2 2.9 1.4 1.1 1.8 Family Factors Poor family management 0.8 0.5 1.2 1.4 1.0 1.9 Parents attitudes favorable 1.3 0.8 2.2 1.4 1.1 1.9 towards drug use Peer/Individual Factors Early initiation of drugs 14.5 9.0 23.5 3.3 2.4 4.6 Favorable attitudes toward 12.9 4.7 35.4 1.8 1.1 3.2 2.3 1.5 3.5 drug use Intention to use drugs 1.4 0.8 2.4 2.6 2.0 3.4 Perceived risks of drug use 3.9 1.8 8.7 1.7 1.0 3.1 2.7 2.0 3.7 Friends use of drugs 2.1 1.3 3.5 2.3 1.6 3.3 Interactions with antisocial 1.7 1.1 2.6 1.7 1.2 2.4 peers Social skills 0.6 0.4 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.9 NOTES:*OR= Odds Ratio. The table shows the upper and lower bounds of the odd ratios. Adjusted for race (white vs. non-white), ethnicity, parental education level (college vs. no college), and rural/urban distinctions for 8th and 10th graders. Adjusted for race, ethnicity, and rural/urban distinction for 6th graders because parents education was not asked on the 6th grade form. Significant factor scales are highlighted. Not statistically significant and not shown: Perceived availability of handguns; opportunities for pro-social involvement (family, community, and school domains); reward for pro-social involvement (family and school domains), academic failure, low commitment to school, early initiation of problem behavior, belief in oral order, interaction with pro-social peers. 7

Frequent Use Early Developmental Stage Risk/Protective Factors Risk/Protective Factor Scales 8 th Grade 10 th Grade OR* 95% Confidence Interval of OR* Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval of OR Poor family management 4.1 2.1 8.2 3.1 2.1 4.6 Parents attitudes favorable towards drug use Opportunities for pro-social involvement (family) Rewards for pro-social involvement (family) 7.8 4.4 13.9 6.2 3.9 10.0 1.3 0.8 2.2 1.1 0.8 1.6 0.6 0.3 1.0 1.0 0.6 1.7 Academic failure 2.0 1.3 3.1 2.3 1.6 3.2 NOTES: *OR= Odds Ratio. The table shows the upper and lower bounds of the odd ratios. Adjusted for race (white vs. non-white), ethnicity, parental education level (college vs. no college), and rural/urban distinctions for 8th and 10th graders. Adjusted for race, ethnicity, and rural/urban distinction for 6th graders because parents education was not asked on the 6th grade form. Significant factor scales are highlighted. 8

Frequent Marijuana Use All Risk/Protective Factors Risk/Protective Factor 8 th Grade 10 th Grade OR* 95% Confidence Interval of OR* Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval of OR Community Factors Laws and norms favorable to drug use 2.2 1.3 3.9 1.2 0.7 2.1 Perceived availability of drugs 1.8 1.0 3.5 2.0 1.4 2.7 Parents attitudes favorable towards drug use Opportunities for pro-social involvement Family Factors 1.8 0.9 3.6 1.9 1.1 3.3 2.1 1.1 4.2 1.9 1.2 3.1 Peer/Individual Factors Early initiation of drugs 6.0 2.0 17.9 3.7 1.8 7.5 Early initiation of problem behavior 2.1 1.1 4.2 1.2 0.7 2.1 Favorable attitudes toward drug use 5.3 1.2 24.1 1.5 0.7 3.3 Perceived risks of use 4.4 1.3 14.5 4.5 2.1 9.7 Friends use of drugs 4.5 1.6 12.6 3.9 2.3 6.8 Interactions with antisocial peers 1.6 0.6 4.1 2.4 1.2 4.7 Social skills 0.3 0.1 0.9 0.6 0.3 1.3 Belief in the moral order 0.8 0.4 1.8 0.6 0.4 0.9 NOTES: *OR= Odds Ratio. The table shows the upper and lower bounds of the odd ratios. Adjusted for race (white vs. non-white), ethnicity, parental education level (college vs. no college), and rural/urban distinctions for 8th and 10th graders. Adjusted for race, ethnicity, and rural/urban distinction for 6th graders because parents education was not asked on the 6th grade form. Significant factor scales are highlighted. Not statistically significant and not shown: Perceived availability of handguns; opportunities for pro-social involvement (community and school domains); poor family management; reward for pro-social involvement (family and school domains), academic failure, low commitment to school, belief in oral order. Not included in the model: Intention to use drugs. 9

Findings Early Developmental Factors Early developmental stage risk/protective factors have a stronger impact on marijuana use when considered independent of the peer/individual later stage risk factors Salient early developmental state factors are Poor family management Parental attitudes favorable to drug use Academic failure 10

Findings All Risk/Protective Factors When all risk and protective factors are considered: Factors in the peer/individual domain are the most salient None of the school domain factors were found to be significantly correlated with use or frequent use Community domains: perceived availability of drugs, and law and norms favorable to drug use (6 th and 8 th graders) are significant 11

Recommendations Prevention programs targeting significant early developmental stage factors have the potential to reduce use and frequent use of marijuana Poor family management Parental attitudes favorable to drug use Academic failure Many peer and individual risk/protective factors are important, but some are more malleable than others Perceived risks of drug use Favorable attitudes towards drug use In the community domain, focus on significant risk/protective factors Perceived availability of drugs Laws and norms favorable to drug use (for younger age group) 12