The Risky Business of Claims-Only Risk Adjustments

Similar documents
Deconstructing the RADV: The Past, Present, and Future of RADV

Removing Risk From Your Risk Adjustments

79 HCCs CMS-HCC Risk Adjustment Model. ICD-10-CM to CMS-HCC Crosswalk. Over 9,500 ICD-10-CM codes map to one or more.

The Financial Impact of ICD-10: Don t Let Risk Adjustment Be an Afterthought

Objectives. Medicare Spending per Beneficiary: Analyzing MSPB Data to Identify Primary Drivers

ICD-10: Don t Let Risk Adjustments Be An Afterthought

At the completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to understand:

Key Performance Indicators to Direct Audit Plans

Adapting Your Risk Adjustment Program to HCC Model V.22

OPERATIONALIZING HIERARCHICAL CONDITION CATEGORIES (HCC SCORING)

Coding for Care: Using Data Analytics for Risk Adjustment. March 2, 2016 Clive Fields, MD, President, Village Family Practice

Diagnosis Coding is About to be Much More Important. Matthew Menendez

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURES MedStar Family Choice Medicare Advantage Plans

Cost-Motivated Treatment Changes in Commercial Claims:

HCC s and Providers: Get Paid For What You Do! Speaker s Disclaimer

Tracking, Trending and Auditing Across a Multi-State Health System

Comparison of Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Treated in Ambulatory Surgical Centers and Hospital Outpatient Departments

CHAPTER 7 SECTION 24.1 PHASE I, PHASE II, AND PHASE III CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS TRICARE POLICY MANUAL M, AUGUST 1, 2002 MEDICINE

Tips for Evolving Medicaid Pharmacy Benefits Management (PBM) Programs. June 5, 2015

REIMBURSEMENT AND ICD-10 CODING. December RB Health Partners, Inc.

Risk Adjustment and Hierarchical Condition Category Coding

Health Links Target Population Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Home Health Prospective Payment System. Overview

Analysis of CY 2018 Advance Notice of Payment and NPA Comments

InterQual Level of Care 2018 Index

Public Policy HCA Public Policy No

Case Review of Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospital Patients Not Suited for Intensive Therapy

Our Specified Illness Benefit Is Now Even Better.

Allied and Therapeutic Extender Benefit

Medicaid Care Management: The Advanced Medical Home (AMH) Program OB Care Management (OBCM) Care Coordination for Children (CC4C) March 2018

InterQual Level of Care 2018 Index

Definitions. Peace of mind today and tomorrow. CRITICAL ILLNESS Basic benefit Deluxe benefit. CRITICAL ILLNESS MULTI-PROTECTION (per child)

TABLE 3: CY 2019 CASE-MIX ADJUSTMENT VARIABLES AND SCORES

The Age of Audits. The Age of Audits Optometry has never been targeted has that changed? What would you do??? The Age of Audits DISCLAIMER

HCCs & Their Impact on Value- Based Payments

PfP Quality Metrics: Readmissions, Value-Based Purchasing and Beyond

*********Americo, Foresters and CFG include medication use in decline timeframe*********

Partial Hospitalization Program Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report. User s Guide Sixth Edition. Prepared by

Short-term Acute Care Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report. User s Guide Twenty-third Edition. Prepared by

Virginia Health Value Dashboard. March 2019

Medicare Severity-adjusted Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs) Coding Adjustment

SUMMARY TABLE OF MEASURES, PRODUCT LINES AND CHANGES

Mirus Metrics Process Companion

HCC Coding for Providers Appropriate Documentation for the Medicare Patient. November 14, 2017

Short-term Acute Care Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report. User s Guide Twenty-second Edition. Prepared by

MedStar Health considers Cough Assist Devices medically necessary for the following indications:

2017 Medicare CAHPS At-A-Glance Report

Jeff Grant, President HCMA, Inc.

Monitoring the Accuracy of Hospital Coding (OEI )

Plan Units. Hospital Confinement $200 per day of covered confinement. Inpatient Drugs and Medicines $30 per day while hospital confined $2,000

Clinical Pathways in the Oncology Care Model

Faculty. W4: Identifying Patients with Rare Disorders Using Administrative Data. O Dan Malone, RPh, PhD University of Arizona

The BIPA Disease Management Demo Project: Improving Outcomes For Medicare Beneficiaries. Prepared for: Disease Management Colloquium June 29, 2004

Challenges for U.S. Attorneys Offices (USAO) in Opioid Cases

Palliative Care Quality Improvement Program (QIP) Measurement Specifications

ACO/HCC/Coding Presentation

Hospice Metrics Using Medicare Data to Measure Access and Performance for Hospice and Palliative Care

This page is for information. Do not submit.

Physician s Compliance Guide

Functional Outcomes among the Medically Complex Population

Christine A. Bono, PhD Program Associate. Elizabeth Shenkman, PhD Principal Investigator. October 24, 2003

Atrius Health Pioneer ACO: Structure, Activities and Results

Pediatric Restorative Benefits: Potential for Fraud & Abuse

Get the Right Reimbursement for High Risk Patients

Contents. copyrighted material by PRO-ED, Inc. Chapter 1. Chapter 2. Chapter 3. Chapter 4. Chapter 5. Conditions in Athletic Injuries

PQRS in TRAKnet 2015 GUIDE TO SUBMIT TING AND REPORTING PQRS IN 2015 THROUGH TRAKNET

Medicare Risk Adjustment for the Frail Elderly

HRSA Office of Rural Health Policy MBQIP Data Report Q&A January 14, 2013

BY-STATE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES AND EXPENDITURES IN MEDICAID, 1999

Short-term Acute Care Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report. User s Guide Sixteenth Edition. Prepared by

Coding for Risk Adjustment: Module: 3

2014 Webinar Series #4 ICD- 10: What to do with the gi, of.me?

Self-assessment checklist

QPP/MIPS Success with Longitudinal Quality Measurement

Financial & Management Aspects of OASIS C2

STARS SYSTEM 5 CATEGORIES

OUTCOMES AND DATA 2016

Member-centered cancer care In Georgia

RE: CALL FOR REVIEW OF DQA INTERIM REPORT ON TESTING QUALITY MEASURES IN ADULT ORAL HEALTH

ProviderNews2015. a growing issue. Body mass index and obesity: Tips and tools for tackling

PQS Summary of Pharmacy/ Medication-Related Updates in the CY 2020 Final Call Letter

Chapter 4 Section Combined Heart-Kidney Transplantation (CHKT)

MEDICARE HCPCS CODING FOR MATRX PRODUCTS

Trending Determinations by Measure

CERT Oxygen Errors: The DME CERT Outreach and Education Task Force Responds

Chapter 18 Section 2. EXPIRED - Department Of Defense (DoD) Cancer Prevention And Treatment Clinical Trials Demonstration

2013: The Year of the ACO (Franciscan Northwest Physicians Health Network, LLC)

Value of Hospice Benefit to Medicaid Programs

NQF-ENDORSED VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS STANDARD FOR HOSPITAL CARE. Measure Information Form Collected For: CMS Outcome Measures (Claims Based)

Combining Risk Adjustment and HEDIS to Improve Quality of Care. Colleen Gianatasio, CPC, CPC-P, CPMA, CPC-I, CRC

Advancing Quality Progress Report. Linda Smyth, Head of Quality Improvement. Approve Adopt Receive for information

Efficiency Methodology

ACO Lunch & Learn ICD 10.Are you ready? March 18, 2015

NCHA Financial Feature

Chapter 4 Section 24.1

Supplementary Online Content

CHAPTER 3 SECTION 1.6G SIMULTANEOUS PANCREAS-KIDNEY, PANCREAS-AFTER-KIDNEY, AND PANCREAS-TRANSPLANT-ALONE

There is a YOU in TEAM: Every Department Plays a Role in Successful Risk Adjustment Management

Dana L. Gilbert Chief Operating Officer Sharon Rudnick Vice President Outpatient Care Management

Transcription:

The Risky Business of Claims-Only Risk Adjustments August 3 rd & 4 th, 2016 Presented by: Kim Browning Executive Vice President Vince Bryant Vice President of Business Development

Agenda 2 Plan Selection Insights HCC Selection Insights Internal Controls Future of RADV Q&A

Selection Insights 3

Higher than average risk scores o Bleeding edge of Prospective Does a lot of Prospective Plan Selection Insights Disproportionate volumes of average HCC Recent merger or acquisition Large membership Issues with timely RAPS and Encounter Data submission Little or no deletes Fast growing 4

HCC Selection Insights 5 Health Plan 1 Health Plan 2 Targeted Diagnosis No dx detected HCC for provider s with high RAF scores More claims driven than prospective and supplemental Long inpatient stay Cross year inpatient claims o Admitted in 2014 o Discharged in 2015

Common concerns o Single source claims o Problematic HCCs HCCs with < 1% average distribution HCC Selection Insights, cont. 6

HCC Selection Insights, cont. 7 HCC HCC 1 HCC 6 HCC 8 HCC 17 HCC 27 HCC 34 HCC 46 HCC 70 HCC 71 HCC 73 HCC 74 HCC 76 HCC 80 HCCs with < 1% Avg Distribution Aids Opportunistic Infections Metastatic Cancer and Acute Leukemia Diabetes with Acute Complications End Stage Liver Chronic Pancreatitis Severe Hematological Disorders Quadriplegia Paraplegia Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Motor Neuron Disease Cerebral Palsy Muscular Dystrophy Coma, Brain Compression/Anoxic Damage HCC HCC 82 HCCs with < 1% Avg Distribution Respirator Dependence/ Tracheostomy Status HCC 104 Monoplegia and Other Paralytic Syndromes HCC 110 Cystic Fibrosis HCC 115 Pneumococcal Pneumonia, Emphysema, Lung Abscess HCC 157 Pressure Ulcer of Skin with Necrosis Through to Muscle, Tendon or Bone HCC 162 Severe Skin Burn or Condition HCC 166 Severe Head injury HCC 173 Traumatic Amputations and Complications HCC 186 Major Organ Transplant or Replacement Status

8 Internal Controls: Pre-RADV Best defense is strong offense Continue to audit vendors o Still need to audit prospective and supplemental

9 Internal Controls: Pre-RADV, cont. Big gap in internal controls Risks lurk in claim-driven risk adjustments o Start/increase auditing effort Collaborate with internal audit Enhance claim filters Look for the infrequent HCCs Single source claims If only one diagnosis submitted in review year YIKES!

10 Internal Controls: Pre-RADV, cont. Adopt consistent discipline of self audits o Once and done is not enough Know your outliers o Regionally o Nationally

11 Internal Controls: Pre-RADV, cont. Medicare Advantage outliers Risk Score Group Strata RAF Average Percent of Population Low < 1.0 60% Medium > 1.0-2.5 35% High 2.6-3.1 < 3% Very High > 3.2 < 3%

12 Internal Controls: Pre-RADV, cont. Duals outliers Risk Score Group Strata RAF Average Percent of Population Low < 1.6 15% Medium 1.6-2.3 < 20% High 2.3-3.2 > 20% Very High > 3.2 > 25%

13 Internal Controls: Pre-RADV, cont. Analytically derived risk points o Members with seven or more HCCs o Members with + 1 in RAF score from prior year o Top 1/3 paid stratum o High distribution HCCs o Presumed red flags Active versus history of Vascular disease Diabetes with complications Major depression Consider a combination

14 Internal Controls: Pre-RADV, cont. Know extrapolation methodology and how it applies to your risk adjustments You got this, right?

RADV EXTRAPOLATION EXAMPLE # RISK SCORE STRATA MA PAYMENT Hypothetical MA Pymt. Variance Weighted Payment error Deviation Deviation Squared Variance (div by 67-1) 1 5.073 TOP 3RD $ 3,934.20 $ 3,000.00 $ 934.20 $ 13,943.28 $ 822.02 $ 675,710.99 2 4.975 TOP 3RD 3,957.67 3,957.67 - - (112.18) 12,585.16 3 4.087 TOP 3RD 3,171.02 3,200.00 (28.98) (432.54) (141.16) 19,927.16 4 3.737 TOP 3RD 2,900.11 2,900.11 - - (112.18) 12,585.16 5 3.547 TOP 3RD 2,753.05 2,753.05 - - (112.18) 12,585.16 63 1.277 TOP 3RD 996.02 996.02 - - (112.18) 12,585.16 64 1.251 TOP 3RD 975.90 975.90 - - (112.18) 12,585.16 65 1.246 TOP 3RD 972.03 972.03 - - (112.18) 12,585.16 66 1.242 TOP 3RD 968.93 968.93 - - (112.18) 12,585.16 67 1.240 TOP 3RD 967.39 967.39 - $ - $ (112.18) $ 12,585.16 $ 109,128.51 $ 101,612.21 $ 7,516.30 $ 112,183.58 $ 0.00 $ 12,710,440.10 192,582.426 Error % 6.89% Enrollee Weight 14.925 Weighted Enrollee Payment Error $ 112,183.58 68 1.224 MIDDLE 3RD $ 955.00 $ 940.00 $ 15.00 $ 223.88 $ (21.11) $ 445.68 69 1.219 MIDDLE 3RD 951.13-951.13 14,195.97 915.02 837,259.42 70 1.207 MIDDLE 3RD 941.84 941.84 - - (36.11) 1,304.02 71 1.204 MIDDLE 3RD 939.52 939.52 - - (36.11) 1,304.02 72 1.168 MIDDLE 3RD 911.65 911.65 - - (36.11) 1,304.02 130 0.685 MIDDLE 3RD 542.04 542.04 - - (36.11) 1,304.02 131 0.685 MIDDLE 3RD 537.81 537.81 - - (36.11) 1,304.02 132 0.683 MIDDLE 3RD 536.25 536.25 - - (36.11) 1,304.02 133 0.679 MIDDLE 3RD 533.16 533.16 - - (36.11) 1,304.02 134 0.679 MIDDLE 3RD 533.16 533.16 - $ - $ (36.11) $ 1,304.02 $ 48,392.30 $ 45,972.85 $ 2,419.45 $ 36,111.19 $ (0.00) $ 2,112,386.58 32,005.857 Error % 5.00% Enrollee Weight 14.925 Weighted Enrollee Payment Error $ 36,111.19 135 0.649 BOTTOM 3RD $ 509.94 $ 515.00 $ (5.06) $ (75.52) $ (16.05) $ 257.74 136 0.649 BOTTOM 3RD 516.19 516.19 - - (10.99) 120.87 137 0.645 BOTTOM 3RD 506.84 506.84 - - (10.99) 120.87 138 0.635 BOTTOM 3RD 499.11 499.11 - - (10.99) 120.87 139 0.617 BOTTOM 3RD 485.17 485.17 - - (10.99) 120.87 197 0.177 BOTTOM 3RD 147.91 145.00 2.91 43.43 (8.08) 65.35 198 0.177 BOTTOM 3RD 144.60 144.60 - - (10.99) 120.87 199 0.177 BOTTOM 3RD 144.60 144.60 - - (10.99) 120.87 200 0.177 BOTTOM 3RD 144.60 144.60 - - (10.99) 120.87 201 0.177 BOTTOM 3RD 144.60 144.60 - $ - $ (10.99) $ 120.87 $ 20,348.32 $ 19,611.71 $ 736.61 $ 10,994.18 $ 0.00 $ 264,963.28 4,014.595 Error % 3.62% Enrollee Weight 14.925 Weighted Enrollee Payment Error $ 10,994.18 2 3 4 4 4 Strata Total $ 177,869.13 $ 167,196.77 $ 10,672.36 $ 159,288.96 Standard Error (SE) (Sq of PE) 58,412.18 Total CMS Pymt $ 3,900,000 Sample Population (Extrapolated) Confidence Interval CI (2.575*SE) $ 150,411.37 Average Error % 6% 4% 5 POINT ESTIMATE (PE) $ 159,288.96 PE + Confidence Interval $ 309,700.33 8 PE - Confidence Interval 8,877.58 9 15 Nh=3000 1 Roadmap Summary 1 RADV eligibles 2 Total CMS payment (based on monthly premiums) 3 Divide sample into three stratum 4 Weight the stratum 5 Point estimate 6 Standard Error 7 Confidence Interval 8 Upper and lower bounds 9 Lower + FFS adjuster 6 7

Future of RADV 16 RAC

Future of RADV, cont. 17 RAC R A D V

18 Future of RADV: A Little Bit on RAC Program Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Program o Selection based on items with a propensity of error o All provider types o Procedure code vs. diagnoses code o Level of care and medical necessity o Looks at both over and under payments o Ongoing audit not an event And don t forget about

19 Future of RADV: GAO Recommendations Improve coding intensity calculation o Only include three most recent years of risk adjustment data o Standardize change in disease risk scores to account for expected increase in all Medicare Advantage contracts o Develop method of accounting to separate provider submissions from supplemental record review o Include beneficiaries renewed from different contracts under same Medicare Advantage organization doing pair-year period

20 Modify contract selection for contract-level RADVs to focus on those with high rate of improper payments o Select contracts with Highest coding intensity score High rates of unsupported diagnosis in prior contract level RADV audits For contracts no longer in operation, select contract under same Medicare Advantage organization and service area Combination of above for plans with high enrollment o Exclude contracts with Low coding intensity score Future of RADV: GAO Recommendations, cont.

Improve RADV timeliness o Closely align timeframe to national RADV o Reduce timeframe between plan selection and audit sample notifications o Improve record transfer reliability and performance o Require defined number of days for audit Improve timeliness of appeals process Future of RADV: GAO Recommendations, cont. Develop plan and timeline for incorporating RAC into Medicare Advantage 21

Q&A 22 For more information, please contact: Kim Browning kbrowning@cognisight.com 585.662.4215 Vince Bryant vbryant@cognisight.com 585.662.4294