Performance of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae nucleic acid amplification assays using low level controls

Similar documents
Controls for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoea

Controls for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoea

UPDATE MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS IN SEXUAL HEALTH. Dr Arlo Upton Clinical Microbiologist Labtests Auckland

New CT/GC Tests. CDC National Infertility Prevention Project Laboratory Update Region II May 13-14, 2009

Xpert CT/NG. Detect it in here. Stop it out there. Three targets, 90 minutes. No repeat testing. Xpert CT/NG. Xpert. A better way.

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE, HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT CLINICAL BIOLOGY COMMISSION CLINICAL BIOLOGY SECTION

2014 CDC GUIDELINES CHLAMYDIA & GONORRHEA DIAGNOSTICS. Barbara Van Der Pol, PhD, MPH University of Alabama at Birmingham

Evaluation of CDC-Recommended Approaches for Confirmatory Testing of Positive Neisseria gonorrhoeae Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Results

6/11/15. BACTERIAL STDs IN A POST- HIV WORLD. Learning Objectives. How big a problem are STIs in the U.S.?

Technical Bulletin No. 98b

DETECTION OF NEISSERIA GONORRHOEAE USING MOLECULAR METHODS

BEIPH Final Report. QCMD 2009 Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NGDNA09) EQA Programme

4. RED AND BLUE TOP COLLECTION SWABS WILL NO LONGER BE SUPPLIED FOR BACTERIAL CULTURE

Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime CT/NG Assay in Comparison to the Roche Cobas Amplicor CT/NG Assay

Case Studies, or Verification Vignettes

CHLAMYDIA/GC AMPLIFIED RNA ASSAY

Chlamydia trachomatis

Chlamydia trachomatis

BEIPH Final Report. EQA Programme 2011 Chlamydia trachomatis (CTDNA11A) William G Mackay on behalf of QCMD and its Scientific Council April 2011

Performance of the Abbott RealTime CT/NG for the Detection of Chlamydia. trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Validation of a Laboratory Developed Real-Time PCR Protocol for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Urine

Genital Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management. William M. Geisler M.D., M.P.H. University of Alabama at Birmingham

Research Article External Quality Assessment for the Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Urine Using Molecular Techniques in Belgium

Performance of the Abbott RealTime CT/NG for Detection of

Nucleic acid amplification testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae where are we going?

Guidelines for the Laboratory Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Treponema pallidum Testing

Received 16 December 2005/Returned for modification 6 February 2006/Accepted 6 May 2006

Scottish Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections Reference Laboratory (SBSTIRL) User Manual Jan 2018

Molecular Diagnosis of Sexually-transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis in the United States

Comparison of Three Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in Urine Specimens

CDC Laboratory Update

Guidance on the use of molecular testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Diagnostic Laboratories 2011

Lymphogranuloma Venereum (LGV) Surveillance Project

Reliable, cost-effective CT/GC testing For labs with low to medium throughput needs. The BD ProbeTec ET System

Received 20 September 2006/Returned for modification 30 October 2006/Accepted 20 December 2006

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Sex Transm Infect. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 June 04.

87491 Chlamydia trachomatis, amplified probe technique Neisseria gonorrhoeae, amplified probe technique. Virology (Performed on Mpls campus)

STI control. Dr. Jane Morgan Hamilton Sexual Health Clinic

ACCEPTED. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 5

APTIMA Combo 2 Testing Detected Additional Cases of Neisseria. gonorrhoeae in Men and Women in Community Settings. * Corresponding Author at:

Chlamydia Rapid Screen Test (RAP-2858) RUO in the USA. Revised 28 Jul 2006

Be sure! Your Power for Health. PelvoCheck CT/NG Your test kit for Chlamydia trachomatis screening and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections

Industry Sponsored Symposia. Québec City, CANADA JULY 10 TO 13,

Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for the Diagnosis of TB

Effect of Endocervical Specimen Adequacy for Detection of ACCEPTED. Wyoming Public Health Laboratory, 517 Hathaway Bldg., 2300 Capitol Ave.

Evaluation of the new BD MAX GC real time PCR assay, analytically and clinically as a

OBJECTIVES. Emerging Laboratory Diagnostic Options for Sexually-transmitted Infections

BEIPH Final Report. EQA Programme 2011 Chlamydia trachomatis B (CTDNA11B) Prepared on behalf of QCMD and its Scientific Council October 2011

Emerging Laboratory Diagnostic Options for Sexually-transmitted Infections

DX CT/NG/MG AUTO ASSAY

Received 26 November 2003/Returned for modification 6 January 2004/Accepted 6 April 2004

Chlamydia trachomatis IgG antibodies. TAT: 7-10 days, Germany. Units: U/ml

Technical Bulletin No. 161

Prevalence of human papillomavirus and Chlamydia trachomatis infection in paired urine and cervical smear samples of Palestinian young women.

Chlamydia Trachomatis and Neisseria Gonorrhoeae. Khalil G. Ghanem, MD Johns Hopkins University

Mycoplasma genitalium:

Dr Selena Singh. Guy s and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London THIRD JOINT CONFERENCE OF BHIVA AND BASHH 2014

One week of doxycycline is an effective treatment for asymptomatic rectal Chlamydia trachomatis infection

Clinical Guidelines Update (aka Know Your NAATs)

Chlamydia Curriculum. Chlamydia. Chlamydia trachomatis

Chlamydia trachomatis Genotypes and the Swedish New Variant among Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Strains in Finland

/01/$ DOI: /JCM Copyright 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Professor Jonathan Ross

Performance of the Abbott Real Time CT/NG assay in urines and cervicovaginal samples from Senegal

APTIMA Combo 2 Assay (PANTHER System)

Received 26 November 2008/Returned for modification 4 February 2009/Accepted 2 April 2009

Women by testing SurePath Liquid-Based Pap Specimens in APTIMA Assays ACCEPTED. Peter D Ascoli 5, Mark Martens 6

Answers to those burning questions -

Technical Bulletin No. 162

ACCEPTED. Instrument in Female Self-obtained Vaginal Swabs and Male Urine Samples. Andrew Hardick 1. Justin Hardick 1.

PERFORMANCE OF THE COBAS CT/NG TEST COMPARED TO THE APTIMA AC2

AMPLIRUN TOTAL A RELIABLE QUALITY CONTROL SOURCE FOR NUCLEIC ACID TESTS

Services for GLBTQ Youth

MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES: STABILITY OF SPECIMENS DURING PREANALYTICS

Trichomonas Time to Know the Facts

Mailed, Home-Obtained Urine Specimens: a Reliable Screening Approach for Detecting Asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis Infections

Received 5 March 2007/Returned for modification 17 May 2007/Accepted 11 June 2007

Review Article A Systematic Review of Point of Care Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae,and Trichomonas vaginalis

SOME ETIOLOGIES OF STI OBJECTIVES CHLAMYDIA TRENDING. Things are Heating Up: An Update on Emerging Sexually-transmitted Infection Agents

GeneXpert System. On-Demand Molecular Testing for the Physician Office Laboratory

Dry swabs or collected in UTM and semen can be used for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the cobas 4800

The BD Viper with XTR technology for STI testing - reliable, accurate and highly efficient

New diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections. Jens Van Praet 30/11/2018

Original article. Office of Disease Prevention and Control, region 10 Chiang Mai, 2 Sanpatong Hospital, 3

The Case of the Spring Break Consequences

Outline. Trichomoniasis: Testing and Treatment Update. What s in a name? From the Greek: trichos, hair monas, unit, single

Correct samples for diagnostic tests in sexually transmitted diseases: which sample for which test? 1

7/24/2012. Estimates of Sexually Transmitted Infections in the U.S.

Validation of the MALDI-TOF for the Identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae

ProbeTec ET Neisseria gonorrhoeae Amplified DNA Assay

COMMUNICABLE DISEASE REPORT

Received 8 September 2005/Returned for modification 12 October 2005/Accepted 9 November 2005

Asymptomatic lymphogranuloma venereum in known HIV positive MSM: is it more common than we think?

Evaluation of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests as Reference Tests for Chlamydia trachomatis Infections in Asymptomatic Men

Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis Rectal Infections

Chlamydia. By Madhuri Reddy

Murex Chlamydia Verification Kit

Dr Edward Coughlan. Clinical Director Christchurch Sexual Health Christchurch

QUALITY CONTROL for MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS Quality issues highlighted through international external quality assessment

Lecture 3 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Nisseria gonorrheae

Transcription:

Performance of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae nucleic acid amplification assays using low level controls 7 th International Symposium on Molecular Diagnostics, Graz, Austria May 2008 Phillip T. Moen, Jr. Ph.D. New Product Development Group SeraCare Life Sciences, Milford, Massachusetts, USA

SeraCare Life Sciences Acquired BBI (Boston Biomedica Inc.) and BBI Biotech Research Labs in 2004 Corporate Headquarters, Manufacturing Milford, MA BioServices, Manufacturing Gaithersburg, MD BioServices Frederick, MD

C. trachomatis (United States) N. gonorrhoeae (United States) U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; www.cdc.gov Goulet et al., Eurosurveillance 5(1),2000 European Incidence Chlamydia Most common reported STD Not a notifiable infection in most European countries 2-17% incidence rate (asymptomatic ) >5% sexually-active women in UK Causes urogenital infections, leading to PID and infertility New variant (nvct) identified in Sweden Not detectable by PCR-based assays Evidence of spreading Gonorrhoeae Second most common reported STD Widely variable incidence among countries Recently trending upwards 4 co-infected with C. trachomatis Mucosal infection leading to cervicitis, prostatitis, PID and sterility Increase in antibiotic resistance noted

C. trachomatis Infection Elementary Body (EB) is infectious form 0.3-0.4µM Environmentally resistant Metabolically inert Columnar epithelium Endocytosis Reorganizes to Reticulate Body (metabolically active) Binary fission replication Reorganize to EB -500 EB s released by reverse endocytosis 15 Serovars A, B, Ba, C Trachoma D-K Genital infection LGV 1-3 Lymphogranuloma venerum Humans only known natural host

N. gonorrhoeae Infection Not part of normal flora Targets non-ciliated mucous epithelium Endocytosis Exocytotic release to sub-epithelial tissue Produces lipopolysaccharide endotoxin TNF-induced cell damage Macrophage/PMN phagocytosis Present in infectious exudate Human only known natural host Almost exclusively by sexual contact 35% transmission efficiency 50-6 efficiency 9 develop symptoms <5 develop symptoms Antibiotic Resistance Chromosomal and plasmid-derived

Specimens and Assay Controls Swab Endocervical swab Male urethral swab Transport Dry Sample Transport Media Urine First Catch (20-30mL) Processed Sample Transport Media Unprocessed Specimen container Controls Appropriate Target type Intact C. trachomatis EB s N. gonorrhoeae cells Nucleic Acids DNA (plasmid and chromosomal) and rrna Control for Sample Processing Validated for Swab and Urine specimens

Analytical Sensitivity of C. trachomatis assays Specimen L2 strain CT001 6680 6788 6157 6962 6424 6233 6681 6346 6547 Clinical isolate 6498 6963 6964 7112 7113 7115 Dilution (EB/ml a ) 1:200 (5,000) 1:500 (2,000) 1:1,000 (1,000) 1:1,200 (833) 1:1,500 (667) 1:2,000 (500) 1:2,000 (500) 1:2,500 (400) 1:3,000 (333) 1:40 (85,750) 1:400 (8,575) 1:400 (8,575) 1:250,000 (14) 1:1,200 (2.858) a Estimated EB per milliliter are extrapolated from IF data for a 1:1,000 dilution (4 x 10-µl wells) Chalker et al., J Clin Microbiol 43, 2005 BDProbeTecET No. pos/total 59/59 65/65 30/32 11/35 40/51 32/40 36/57 26/47 27/59 47/47 47/47 54/54 18.54 54/54 93.8 31.4 78.4 80 63.2 55.3 45.8 33.3 Result by: Roche AMPLICOR CT/NG No. pos/total 66/66 66/67 39/39 60/71 52/53 42/44 56/63 51/52 54/58 35/35 35/35 41/41 13/41 41/41 98.5 84.5 98.1 95.5 88.9 98.1 93.1 31.7

Analytical Sensitivity of C. trachomatis assays Specimen L2 strain CT001 6680 6788 6157 6962 6424 6233 6681 6346 6547 Clinical isolate 6498 6963 6964 7112 7113 7115 Dilution (EB/ml a ) 1:200 (5,000) 1:500 (2,000) 1:1,000 (1,000) 1:1,200 (833) 1:1,500 (667) 1:2,000 (500) 1:2,000 (500) 1:2,500 (400) 1:3,000 (333) 1:40 (85,750) 1:400 (8,575) 1:400 (8,575) 1:250,000 (14) 1:1,200 (2.858) a Estimated EB per milliliter are extrapolated from IF data for a 1:1,000 dilution (4 x 10-µl wells) Chalker et al., J Clin Microbiol 43, 2005 BDProbeTecET No. pos/total 59/59 65/65 30/32 11/35 40/51 32/40 36/57 26/47 27/59 47/47 47/47 54/54 18.54 54/54 93.8 31.4 78.4 80 63.2 55.3 45.8 33.3 Result by: Roche AMPLICOR CT/NG No. pos/total 66/66 66/67 39/39 60/71 52/53 42/44 56/63 51/52 54/58 35/35 35/35 41/41 13/41 41/41 98.5 84.5 98.1 95.5 88.9 98.1 93.1 31.7

Analytical Sensitivity of C. trachomatis assays Specimen L2 strain CT001 6680 6788 6157 6962 6424 6233 6681 6346 6547 Clinical isolate 6498 6963 6964 7112 7113 7115 Dilution (EB/ml a ) 1:200 (5,000) 1:500 (2,000) 1:1,000 (1,000) 1:1,200 (833) 1:1,500 (667) 1:2,000 (500) 1:2,000 (500) 1:2,500 (400) 1:3,000 (333) 1:40 (85,750) 1:400 (8,575) 1:400 (8,575) 1:250,000 (14) 1:1,200 (2.858) a Estimated EB per milliliter are extrapolated from IF data for a 1:1,000 dilution (4 x 10-µl wells) Chalker et al., J Clin Microbiol 43, 2005 BDProbeTecET No. pos/total 59/59 65/65 30/32 11/35 40/51 32/40 36/57 26/47 27/59 47/47 47/47 54/54 18.54 54/54 93.8 31.4 78.4 80 63.2 55.3 45.8 33.3 Result by: Roche AMPLICOR CT/NG No. pos/total 66/66 66/67 39/39 60/71 52/53 42/44 56/63 51/52 54/58 35/35 35/35 41/41 13/41 41/41 98.5 84.5 98.1 95.5 88.9 98.1 93.1 31.7

Performance of C. trachomatis assays Clinical Sensitivity of Commercial C. trachomatis NAATs Roche Amplicor 1 ProbeTec SDA 2, 3 Gen-probe APTIMA 4 Gene target Cryptic plasmid Cryptic plasmid 23S ribosomal RNA gene Technology PCR SDA TMA Sensitivity (Swab) 91.3% (85.8-96.7) 93.7% (92.8-94.6) 96.5% (92.9-96.9) Specificity (Swab) 98.1% (97.3-98.9) 96.2% (98.1-94.2) 97.6% (96.8-98.2) Sensitivity (Urine) 87.9% (81.4-94.3) 96. (88.8-99.2) 96.5% (94.5-98.0) Specificity (Urine) 97.2% (96.2-98.2) % (99.1-) 98.7% (98.2-99.2) Serovars Detected All 15; not nvct All 15 incl. nvct All 15 incl. nvct 1 Roche COBAS Amplicor CT/NG Test for N. gonorrhoeae Product Insert, 10/2004, Rev. 5.0 2 BD ProbeTec ET CTNG Amplified DNA assay Product Insert. Rev. 0606 3 Gaydos et al. J Clin Microbiol. 42, 2004) 4 Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo2 Product Insert, IN0156 rev. B

Performance of N. gonorrhoeae assays Analytical Sensitivity of Commercial N. gonorrhoeae NAATs (Manufacturer data) Assay Vol/assay Analytical sensitivity (Limit of Detection) Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 1 400μl 50 cells/assay; 125 cells/ml Roche COBAS Amplicor 2 BD ProbeTec ET 3 Gen-Probe PACE 2 4 50μl 200μl μl CFU/ml urine; 400 CFU/ml swab 10 cells/assay; 50 cells/ml 650 CFU/assay; 6500 CFU/ml 1 Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo2 Product Insert, IN0156 rev. B 2 Roche COBAS Amplicor CT/NG Test for N. gonorrhoeae Product Insert, 10/2004, Rev. 5.0 3 BD ProbeTec ET CTNG Amplified DNA assay Product Insert. Rev. 0606 4 Gen-Probe PACE 2C Product Insert, 103906 rev. L Clinical Sensitivity of Commercial N. gonorrhoeae NAATs Roche Amplicor ProbeTec SDA Gen-probe APTIMA Gene target Cytosine DNA methyltransferase gene Multicopy pilin gene-inverting protein homologue 16S ribosomal RNA gene Technology PCR SDA TMA Sensitivity 64.8 to % 84.9 to % 91.3 to 98.5% Specificity 93.9 to % 98.4 to % 98.7 to 99.3% PPV 31.3 to % 54.8 to % 88.1 to 97.4% NPV 99.5 to % 95.2 to % 99.2 to 99.9% Cross-reactivity with other Neisseria species N. cinerea, N. flavescens, N. lactamica, N. sicca, N. subflava N. flavescens, N. lactamica, N. subflava, N. cinerea None identified Whiley, Tapsall and Sloots. J Mol Diag 8, 2006

Verification Studies Purpose: to assess error inherent in the test, so that you can recognize unacceptable changes Studies: Accuracy comparison of methods experiment sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV Linearity Precision within-run (repeatability) between-run (reproducibility) Analytical sensitivity (detection limits) Analytical Specificity

Verifying test performance in your lab Accuracy: can the test produce the correct result? Reproducibility/precision: can it do this consistently? Robustness: can all our techs run this method reliably on our schedule? Reference range/reportable range: was the manufacturer s range established with a population similar to ours? Calibration plan: what does the manufacturer recommend, and can we do this? QC plan: how do we detect errors when they occur?

Precision verification Repeatability: results of multiple observations (tests) under identical conditions (often in one run) Estimates random error of a test Use clinically relevant analyte levels low/high clinical decision points Use clinically relevant sample matrix more than one? Typically involves ~20 replicates calculate mean, sd, CV QC samples customarily used

Accurun 341 CT/NG Positive Controls C. trachomatis Purified Elementary Bodies Serovar L2, strain 424 Derived from LGV Heat-inactivated Compatible with all assay platforms Contains non-deleted cryptic plasmid rdna homology across serovars N. gonorrhoeae (Zopf 1885) Trevisan 1885 NCTC 8375/ATCC 19424 Heat-inactivated Compatible with all assay platforms Multi-Analyte Control Suspended in stabilized trypticase soy broth (TSB) media Non-interfering with assay platforms >5 yr real-time stability (Roche COBAS Amplicor) 2 o C to 8 o C storage

C. trachomatis/n. gonorrhoeae Assay Comparison 1. Prepare CT and GC dilutions individually 2. Run same dilutions on each platform, following assay instructions 3. Bracket additional sub-dilutions for continuity 4. Convert dilutions to theoretical particle counts NG: A 550 CT: TEM qpcr values ~ 10-fold higher for both 5. Determine C 50 and C 95 levels

Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo2 Assay Gen-Probe Aptima Combo CT LOD EB/mL 1 itive score % 8 6 4 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 Particle count CT 3 10 25 50 125 250 625 1250 2500 67% % % % % % % % % Ferrer et al. 2002 IUSTI itive at 1 EB/mL Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo2 Package Insert <10 EB/mL Gen-Probe Aptima Combo GC LOD Cell/mL 1 itive score % 8 6 4 2 NG 0 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 0 1 1200 Particle count 3 10 25 50 125 250 625 1250 2500 25% 5 % % % Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo2 Package Insert 125 NG cells/ml

Roche COBAS Amplicor CT/NG Assay Roche Amplicor CT EB LOD EB/mL EB/mL 0.1 333 93.1% itive score % 8 6 4 2 CT 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Particle count 1 3 5 10 25 50 75 17% 33% 67% % % 400 98.1% 500 88.9% 500 95.5% 677 98.1% 833 84.5% 1,000 % 2,000 98.5% 5,000 % Chalker et al., J Clin Microbiol 43, 2005 Roche Amplicor NG LOD Cell/mL 0.1 33% itive score % 8 6 4 2 NG 0 1 2 3 4 5 Particle count 1 3 5 10 25 50 75 67% % % % % % % % Roche COBAS Amplicor CT/NG N. gonorrhoeae Package Insert CFU/mL Urine 400 CFU/mL Swab

BD ProbeTec ET CT and NG Amplified DNA assay BD ProbeTec CT LOD EB/mL EB/mL % 3 10 8% 333 400 45.8% 55.3% itive score 8 6 4 2 0 200 400 600 800 0 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 Particle count CT 50 125 625 0 1250 2500 5000 17% 33% 5 67% 89% % % 500 63.2% 500 8 677 78.4% 833 31.4% 1,000 93.8% 2,000 % 5,000 % Chalker et al., J Clin Microbiol 43, 2005 BD ProbeTec GC LOD EB/mL itive score % 8 6 4 2 NG 1 5 10 25 50 125 625 17% 5 67% % % % 0 25 50 75 125 Particle count BD ProbeTec ET Package Insert LOD 95 : 50 cells/ml

Low-Positive CT and NG Nucleic Acid Controls Purpose of controls is to challenge each type of assay Different assay sensitivities prevents use of a single control for all assays Assay Aptima Amplicor ProbeTec C. trachomatis C 50 C >95 3 10 38 75 625 2500 N. gonorrhoeae C 50 C >95 250 625 1 3 10 50 Solution: Prepare Low-Positive Multi-Analyte CT and NG Nucleic Acid Controls targeted to each major assay platform A341 Series for Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo2 A341 Series 200 for Roche COBAS Amplicor CTNG A341 Series 400 for BD ProbeTec ET CTNG Amplified DNA Assay

Acknowledgements SeraCare Life Sciences Testing Laboratory Patricia Nye Donna Capozzoli Diane McCoy BioServices Bharathi Anekella, Ph.D. Manufacturing Jim Doherty Joan Thurston ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT Jon Lowe pmoen@seracare.com