INCREASED PULSE PRESSURE AND SYSTOLIC x HEART RATE DOUBLE PRODUCT AND CARDIOVASCULAR AUTONOMIC NEUROPATHY IN TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS A.J. Scheen, J.C. Philips, M. Marchand Division of Diabetes, Nutrition & Metabolic Disorders, Department of Medicine, CHU Sart Tilman, B-4000 Liège, Belgium
The BP Components of the Arterial Pulse Wave Pulsatile stress 125 Systolic pressure Dicrotic notch (aortic valve closes) Pressure (mm Hg) 75 Pulse pressure Diastolic pressure Mean pressure Time = 1/3 SBP + 2/3 DBP Diastolic decay curve
Background Arterial pulse pressure (PP), a surrogate marker of large artery stiffness, was shown to be an independent cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor in several large longitudinal studies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Schram MT et al. Diabetes, pulse pressure and cardiovascular mortality the Hoorn Study. J Hypertens 20: 1743 1751, 2002 Cockcroft JR et al. Pulse pressure predicts cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Hypertens 18: 1463-1467; discussion 1468-1469, 2005 Nilsson PM et al. Pulse pressure strongly predicts cardiovascular disease risk in patients with type 2 diabetes from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR). Diabetes Metab 35: 439-446, 2009
Aims To compare PP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) x heart rate (HR) double product during an active orthostatic test in patients with T2DM and in nondiabetic individuals matched for age (40-60 years), body mass index (BMI) and sex ratio (1/1). To analyze the relationships between pulsatile stress and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with T2DM
Methods : population Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) Nondiabetic overweight/obese subjects (OC) P value N (Male/Female) 20/20 20/20 Age (yrs) 50 ± 6 50 ± 6 0.8971 Diabetes duration (yrs) 8 ± 7 - NA BMI (kg/m 2 ) 29.7 ± 3.7 28.6 ± 2.7 0.1288 HbA1c (%) 7.8 ± 1.6 - NA Patients with arterial hypertension, renal insufficiency or CVD or taking medications interfering with vascular reactivity (including any type of antihypertensive agents) were excluded from the study.
Methods : Finapres Non-invasive beat-to-beat monitoring of arterial blood pressure was obtained using a Finapres device (Finger Arterial Pressure, Ohmeda, Louisville, CO, USA) and a Finger cuff photoelectric method. Several studies have Li ght detector demonstrated the accuracy of such indirect Pressure transducer measurement with direct intra-arterial blood pressure and its reproducibility during various Pletysmogram to microprocessor Gain set by laboratory tests. Microprocessor Set point determined from Variable gain am pl ifie r Compute r and display The Finapres device provides a beat to unloaded arte ry size C S Pressure source beat set of 3 measured parameters : systolic Summing am pl ifie r O (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and mean (MAP) arterial Cuff pressure set by PID servo -loop co ntroler Servo valva blood pressure. Heart rate (HR) was derived mi crop rocesso r from pressure wave after having verified a perfect concordance with ECG recording, and pulse pressure (PP) was calculated as the difference between systolic and diastolic pressure values.
Methods : Squatting Test All patients were evaluated with a continuous arterial blood pressure monitoring (Finapres ) in standing (1min), squatting (1min) and again standing position (1min).
Squatting and pulse pressure Recent reports in type 1 diabetes Philips JC, Marchand M, Scheen AJ Squatting amplifies pulse pressure increase according to duration of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 322-324. Pulse pressure and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy according to duration of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2009; 25: 442-451. Changes in pulse pressure, heart rate, and the pulse pressure x heart rate product during squatting in Type 1 diabetes according to age. Diabetic Medicine 2010; in press.
Methods : Baroreflex gain BAROREFLEX GAIN rr intervals (msec) 900 850 800 750 700 650 R 2 = 0,9222 600 80 90 100 110 120 130 SBP (mmhg) Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) was assessed by the baroreflex gain measured by comparing HR and SBP changes during the transition from squatting to standing. Baroreflex gain : slope of the regression line relating R-R intervals to SBP changes (well correlated with other CAN indices).
Results 105 100 95 90 85 mmhg MAP D2 OC Similar Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) in selected T2DM patients and 80 75 overweight/obese nondiabetic controls 70 65 (exclusion of patients with hypertension) 60 75 70 65 60 mmhg PP Higher pulse pressure (PP) in T2DM patients than in overweight/obese 55 nondiabetic controls (in relation to 50 arterial stiffness) 45 40 100 HR 95 90 85 80 75 70 time (sec) 65 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 bpm Higher heart rate (HR) in T2DM patients than in overweight/obese nondiabetic controls (in relation to cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy or CAN)
Results Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) Nondiabetic overweight/obese subjects (OC) (n = 40) (n = 40) P value Mean BP (mm Hg) 88 ± 13 86 ± 12 0.5991 Systolic BP (mm Hg) 128 ± 20 122 ± 18 0.1087 Diastolic BP (mm Hg) 70 ± 13 70 ± 10 0.1662 PP (mm Hg) 58 ± 16 52 ± 13 0.0451 HR (bpm) 91 ±10 84 ± 13 0.0029 SBP x HR product (mm Hg*min -1 ) 12082 ± 2521 10195 ± 2291 0.0008 Significantly higher PP, HR and SBP x HR product in type 2 diabetes, despite similar BP
Results Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) Nondiabetic overweight/obese subjects (OC) P value Baroreflex gain mmhg/min -1 2.05 ± 1.31 2.97 ± 2.18 0.0256 Patients with type 2 diabetes (8-year duration, HbA1c 7.8 %) have significantly reduced baroreflex gain when compared to nondiabetic individuals, demonstrating the presence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN)
Results : PP / NAC correlations 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 PP (mmhg) T2DM GAIN (mmhg/min -1 ) R 2 = 0,3664 p<0,0001 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 SBP X HR T2DM R 2 = 0,4382 p<0,0001 GAIN (mmhg/min -1 ) Highly significant negative correlations between PP or SBPxHR and baroreflex gain in patients with T2DM 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 PP (mmhg) CONTROLS GAIN (mmhg/min -1 ) R 2 = 0,0193 p = 0,8858 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7500 6500 5500 4500 3500 2500 1500 SBP X HR CONTROLS GAIN (mmhg/min -1 ) R 2 = 0,1238 p = 0,1029 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 No significant correlations between PP or SBPxHR and baroreflex gain in nondiabetic individuals
Discussion : Relationships between arterial stifness and autonomic nerve function Ahlgren AR et al. Increased aortic stiffness in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus is associated with diabetes duration and autonomic nerve function. Diabetic Med 1999; 16: 291-7. Mattace-Raso FU et al. Arterial stiffness, cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity and postural blood pressure changes in older adults: the Rotterdam Study. J Hypertens 2007; 25:1421-6.
Conclusion Patients with T2DM have higher PP, an indirect marker of arterial stiffness, and higher SBP x HR double product, an index of cardiac workload, than nondiabetic patients with similar age and BMI, as well as markers of CAN, which all may contribute to the higher cardiovascular risk associated with T2DM.