Abciximab plus Heparin versus Bivalirudin in Patients with NSTEMI Undergoing PCI. ISAR-REACT 4 Trial

Similar documents
Randomized Comparison of Prasugrel and Bivalirudin versus Clopidogrel and Heparin in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Bivalirudin should be indicated for all patients with STEMI. Adnan Kastrati Deutsches Herzzentrum, Munich, Germany

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial. Zotarolimus- vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions

Impact of coronary atherosclerotic burden on clinical presentation and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease

A Polymer-Free Dual Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trial Versus Polymer-Based DES.

ARMYDA-RECAPTURE (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) trial

Polymer-Free Stent CX - ISAR

Novel Anticoagulation Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Abciximab and Heparin versus Bivalirudin for Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Pathophysiology of ACS

Bivalirudin Clinical Trials Update Evidence and Future Perspectives

Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes

Anti-platelet Therapies in Cardiovascular Disease: From Stable CAD to ACS and Afib!

A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Strategy in Patients with Non-ST Elevation ACS

Clopidogrel vs New Antiplatelet Therapy (Prasugrel) Adnan Kastrati, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität München, Germany

Adjunctive Antithrombotic for PCI. SCAI Fellows Course December 9, 2013

In-Ho Chae. Seoul National University College of Medicine

Is the role of bivalirudin established?

Update on Antithrombotic Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Protocol. This trial protocol has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

Treatment Strategies for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Stent Placement

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

Komplexe Koronarintervention heute: Von Syntax zu bioresorbierbaren Stents

Antiplatelet and Antithrombotic Therapies in PCI Defining the Optimal Strategy

Lessons learned From The National PCI Registry

Continuing Medical Education Post-Test

Vascular Closure Devices Versus Manual Compression After Femoral Artery Access

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Learning Objectives. Epidemiology of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation

An update on the management of UA / NSTEMI. Michael H. Crawford, MD

Otamixaban for non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

Prise en charge du SCA ST + en urgence. 9803mo01, 1

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

The Case for Multivessel Revascularization in Shock

Oral Antiplatelet Therapy in PCI/ACS. Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, PhD, FACC, FESC Director of Cardiovascular Research Assistant Professor of Medicine

Supplementary Online Content

C. W. Hamm, B. Cremers, H. Moellmann, S. Möbius-Winkler, U. Zeymer, M. Vrolix, S. Schneider, U. Dietz, M. Böhm, B. Scheller

CPORT E Trial. Atlantic C PORT

Supplementary Table 1: Age, gender and treatment received in included studies

Department of Medicine III, Martin Luther-University Halle, Germany b. Unità Operativa di Cardiologia, Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy c

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

Updated and Guideline Based Treatment of Patients with STEMI

What is the Optimal Triple Anti-platelet Therapy Duration in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Drug-eluting Stents Implantation?

Cangrelor: Is it the new CHAMPION for PCI? Robert Barcelona, PharmD, BCPS Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Cardiac Intensive Care Unit November 13, 2015

Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, On the behalf of SMART-DATE trial investigators ACC LBCT 2018

(ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT ) Title: The Italian Elderly ACS Study Author: Stefano Savonitto. Date: 29 August 2011 Meeting: ESC congress, Paris

Myocardial Infarction In Dr.Yahya Kiwan

Adjunctive Antithrombotic for PCI. SCAI Fellows Course December 8, 2014

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

EXAMINATION trial. Manel Sabaté Hospital Clínic, Barcelona (On behalf of the Examination Investigators)

Clinical Case. Management of ACS Based on ACC/AHA & ESC Guidelines. Clinical Case 4/22/12. UA/NSTEMI: Definition

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO

Optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy for patients treated in STEMI network

Direct Thrombin Inhibitors for PCI Pharmacology: Role of Bivalirudin in High-Risk PCI

Alex versus Xience Registry Preliminary report

Chronic Total Occlusion: A case for coronary artery bypass grafting

Stephan Windecker Department of Cardiology Swiss Cardiovascular Center and Clinical Trials Unit Bern Bern University Hospital, Switzerland

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 29 April 2009

Mid-term results from real-world REPARA registry. Felipe Hernandez, on behalf of the REPARA investigators

Antiplatelet Therapy: how, why, when? For Coronary Stenting

Acute Coronary Syndromes

A Clinical Trial of Abciximab in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention after Pretreatment with Clopidogrel

LM stenting - Cypher

Clopidogrel and ASA after CABG for NSTEMI

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Prognostic Significance of Epicardial Blood Flow Before and After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Optimal antithrombotic therapy:

What is new in the Treatment of STEMI? Malcolm R. Bell, MBBS Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

MULTIcentre evaluation of Single high-dose. acute myocardial infarction study

C.R.E.D.O. Multicenter Multinational (USA, Canada) Prospective Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial

Ticagrelor vs Aspirin in Patients undergoing Coronary- Artery Bypass Grafting

Disclosures. Dr. Scirica has also served as a consultant for Lexicon, Arena, Gilead, and Eisai.

CULPRIT-SHOCK: A Randomized Trial of Multivessel PCI in Cardiogenic Shock. Holger Thiele, MD on behalf of the CULPRIT-SHOCK Investigators

scores in acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusions:

Fractional Flow Reserve and the 1 Year Results of the FAME Study

Patient characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of followup

Non ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

Safety-outcomes of bioresorbable Everolimus eluting scaffold in (German-Austrian-ABSORB RegIsteR)

2007 ACC/AHA GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF NSTE-ACS: OPTIMAL ANTICOAGULATION AND ANTIPLATELET THERAPY

Timing of Anti-Platelet Therapy for ACS (EARLY-ACS & ACUITY) Mitchell W. Krucoff, MD, FACC

Keywords Non ST-segment elevation ACS Antithrombotic therapy Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor Tirofiban. Introduction

FAME STUDY: 2-year Follow-Up & CLINICAL SUBGROUP ANALYSIS

Unprotected LM intervention

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 51, No. 18, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /08/$34.

M/39 CC D. => peak CKMB (12 hr later) ng/ml T.chol/TG/HDL/LDL 180/150/48/102 mg/dl #

Abciximab in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Clopidogrel Pretreatment

Bern-Rotterdam Cohort Study

High-Dose Tirofiban Administered as Bolus-Only during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Supplementary Table S1: Proportion of missing values presents in the original dataset

P2Y 12 blockade. To load or not to load before the cath lab?

Target vessel only revascularization versus complet revascularization in non culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI

DO NOT SUBMIT OR FAX THIS PAGE TO COR F M L DD MM YY

Transcription:

Abciximab plus Heparin versus Bivalirudin in Patients with NSTEMI Undergoing PCI ISAR-REACT 4 Trial Adnan Kastrati, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany On behalf of F.-J. Neumann, S. Schulz, S. Massberg, K.L. Laugwitz, M. Ferenc, D. Antoniucci, P.B. Berger, J. Mehilli, A. Schömig

Conflicts of interest Speaker fees/honoraria from: Abbott Astra-Zeneca Bristol-Myers Cordis Daichii Sankyo/Lilly Medtronic

Background Abciximab, a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, has improved the results of PCI in patients with ACS Death/MI/UTVR, % 15 10 ISAR-REACT 2, JAMA 2006 20 11.9% 15 8.9% Death/MI/UTVR, % Troponin-Positive: RR=0.71 [0.54-0.95] Abciximab vs. Placebo 10 Abciximab vs. Placebo 5 RR = 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58-0.97] 5 Troponin-Negative: RR=0.99 [0.56-1.76] 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days after randomization 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days after randomization

Background Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has been superior to GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors plus heparins in patients with ACS ACUITY, NEJM 2006

Background Relevant issues with the ACUITY trial Open-label trial 40% of the patients without elevated troponin PCI in <60% of the patients Control group: a mixture of UFH/Enoxaparin and 3 GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (only 9% abciximab) Liberal definition of bleeding (including 5 cm hematomas)

Rationale of ISAR-REACT 4 trial The combination of abciximab and unfractionated heparin has not been compared with bivalirudin in dedicated studies involving patients with NSTEMI undergoing PCI Objective of ISAR-REACT 4 trial to determine whether the combination of abciximab with unfractionated heparin, as compared with bivalirudin, improves the clinical outcomes in patients with acute NSTEMI undergoing PCI

Study organization Steering committee: A. Schömig (Chairman), A. Kastrati (PI), F.J. Neumann, P.B. Berger Participating centers: Germany Deutsches Herzzentrum, Munich (PI: S. Massberg) Herz-Zentrum, Bad Krozingen (PI: F.J. Neumann) 1. Med. Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich (PI: K.L. Laugwitz) Vivantes Auguste-Viktoria-Klinikum, Berlin (PI: H. Schühlen) Uniklinik, Tübingen (PI: M. Gawaz) Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin (PI: H. Darius) US Geisinger Clinic, Danville, PA (PI: P.B. Berger) Italy Careggi Hospital, Florence (PI: D. Antoniucci)

Inclusion criteria Age between 19 and 80 years; unstable angina within the preceding 48 hours; elevated levels of cardiac biomarkers (troponin or CK MB); and coronary stenoses requiring PCI Main exclusion criteria STEMI within 48 hours from symptom onset; cardiogenic shock; active bleeding or a bleeding diathesis; a planned staged PCI procedure within 30 days; glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min or creatinine >30 mg/l; receipt of coumarin within 7d, a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor within 14d, UFH within 4h, LMWH within 8 h, and bivalirudin within 24h

Primary endpoint A composite of death, large myocardial infarction or urgent target vessel revascularization within 30 days (large MI: new Q waves or CK-MB elevation >5 times above ULN) Secondary endpoints Efficacy A composite of death, any myocardial infarction or urgent target vessel revascularization within 30 days (any MI: new Q waves or CK-MB elevation >3 times above ULN) Safety Major bleeding within 30 days (intracranial, intraocular, or retroperitoneal; Hb decrease >40g/L plus either overt bleeding or need for transfusion of 2 or more units)

Sample size calculation 30% reduction of the incidence of the 1 endpoint with abciximab plus heparin - abciximab plus heparin: 10.7% - bivalirudin: 15.3% 2-sided α-level: 5% Power: 80% 1,700 patients

Trial flow-chart 1,721 Pts with NSTEMI Pre-treated with 600 mg of clopidogrel Double-blind (double-dummy drug) 861 pts 860 pts Abciximab Bivalirudin Bolus of 0.25 mg/kg Infusion of 0.125 μg/kg/min for 12h Unfractionated heparin Bolus of 70 U/kg Bolus of 0.75 mg/kg Infusion of 1.75 mg/kg/hr for duration of PCI No PCI: 2 patients 2 patients

Baseline characteristics Abciximab n=861 Bivalirudin n=860 Age, yrs 67.5 11.2 67.5 10.8 Women, % 23.2 23.1 Hypercholesterolemia, % 69.7 67.4 Arterial hypertension, % 86.5 84.5 Diabetes mellitus, % 29.8 28.3 Current smoker, % 25.0 22.7 Body mass index, kg/m 2 27.8 4.6 27.8 4.2

Baseline characteristics Abciximab n=861 Bivalirudin n=860 Previous PCI, % 33.9 31.0 Previous CABG, % 10.7 10.3 Previous MI, % 21.8 19.0 Multivessel disease, % 80.6 79.4 LV ejection fraction, % 51.5 11.5 51.3 11.5

Lesion and procedure characteristics Abciximab n=859 Bivalirudin n=858 Vessel LCA, % 3.1 2.9 LAD, % 36.8 40.4 LCx, % 28.1 26.9 RCA, % 27.5 26.5 Bypass vein graft, % 4.5 3.3 Complex (B2/C) lesions, % 85.2 87.2 DES, % 88.9 88.2 BMS, % 6.8 7.6 PTCA, % 4.3 4.2

Primary endpoint Death, large MI, utvr, major bleeding Cumulative Incidence (%) 20 15 10 5 Relative risk, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.74 1.32) P=0.94 Abciximab 10.9% Bivalirudin 11.0% 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days since Randomization

Primary endpoint analysis in various subsets Death, large MI, utvr, major bleeding Subgroup Age >68.3 yr 68.3 yr Sex Women Men Diabetes Yes No Body Mass Index >27.3 kg/m 2 27.3 kg/m 2 Troponin T >0.12 μg/l 0.12 μg/l Abciximab Bivalirudin no. of events/total no. (%) 48/450 (10.7) 49/443 (11.1) 46/411 (11.2) 46/417 (11.0) 31/200 (15.5) 25/199 (12.6) 63/661 (9.5) 70/661 (10.6) 27/257 (10.5) 24/243 (9.9) 67/604 (11.1) 71/617 (11.5) 42/435 (9.7) 46/426 (10.8) 52/426 (12.2) 49/434 (11.3) Glomerular filtration rate >83 ml/min 47/421 (11.2) 44/440 (10.0) 83 ml/min 47/440 (10.7) 51/420 (12.1) 56/424 (13.2) 66/425 (15.5) 38/437 (8.7) 29/435 (6.7) Relative Risk (95% CI) P Value for Interaction 0.94 0.27 0.71 0.51 0.41 0.15 0 1 2 Abciximab better Bivalirudin better

Secondary efficacy endpoint Death, any MI, utvr Cumulative Incidence (%) 20 15 10 5 0 Relative risk, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.74 1.25) P=0.76 Abciximab Bivalirudin Abciximab Bivalirudin Death, % 1.4 1.6 Any MI, % 12.0 11.4 utvr, % 0.8 1.3 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days since Randomization 12.8% 13.4%

Secondary safety endpoint Major bleeding Cumulative Incidence (%) 20 15 10 5 Relative risk, 1.82 (95% CI, 1.10 3.07) P=0.02 Abciximab 4.6% Bivalirudin 2.6% 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Days since Randomization

Conclusions Abciximab and unfractionated heparin, as compared with bivalirudin, failed to reduce the rate of the primary endpoint and increased the risk of bleeding among patients with NSTEMI undergoing PCI. These findings along with those reported for STEMI show that bivalirudin might be the preferred drug in patients undergoing PCI for an acute myocardial infarction, with or without ST-segment elevation.

Online publication