Vest Prevention of Early Sudden Death Trial (VEST)

Similar documents
Vest Prevention of Early Sudden Death Trial (VEST)

Risk Stratification of Sudden Cardiac Death

LifeVest. Sven Reek, Aarau. Conflict of interest: none

Where Does the Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator (WCD) Fit In?

Primary prevention of SCD with the ICD in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

ICD. Guidelines and Critical Review of Trials. Win K. Shen, MD Professor of Medicine Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Mayo Clinic Arizona Torino 2011

ICD Guidelines: who benefits from an ICD?

Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Tachycardia Devices Indications and Basic Trouble Shooting

Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

The Role of ICD Therapy in Cardiac Resynchronization

Sudden death as co-morbidity in patients following vascular intervention

Preventing cardiac arrest in high risk patients without indication for ICD

Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure: What do we need to know in 2018? Juan M. Aranda, Jr. MD FACC

Cardiac Devices CRT,ICD: Who is and is not a Candidate? Who Decides

Prevention of sudden cardiac death: With an emphasis on sudden cardiac death from ventricular arrhythmias

News der kardialen Device - Therapie! Christian Binggeli! Rhythmologie Klinik St. Anna, Luzern! HerzGefässZentrum Zürich, KlinikImPark, Zürich!

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Zoll Medical--LifeVest:

Preventing Sudden Death Current & Future Role of ICD Therapy

Role of Non-Implantable Defibrillators in the Management of Patients at High Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death

2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death Guideline. Top Ten Messages. Eleftherios M Kallergis, MD, PhD, FESC

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for > deaths in

4. Which survey program does your facility use to get your program designated by the state?

Alex versus Xience Registry Preliminary report

Do All Patients With An ICD Indication Need A BiV Pacing Device?

Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Devices and Other Non- Pharmacologic Therapy in CHF. Angel R. Leon, MD FACC Division of Cardiology Emory University School of Medicine

ICD Therapy. Disclaimers

Ventricular Assist Device: Are Early Interventions Superior? Hamang Patel, MD Section of Cardiomyopathy & Heart Transplantation

Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillators

Who does not need a primary preventive ICD?

Sudden Cardiac Death What an electrophysiologist thinks a cardiologist should know

Synopsis of Management on Ventricular arrhythmias. M. Soni MD Interventional Cardiologist

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in MADIT II Patients with Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure

Recurrent Implantable Defibrillator Discharges (ICD) Discharges ICD Storm

Quality Measures MIPS CV Specific

Implantable Cardioverter- Defibrillators (ICDs) for the Prevention of SCD: Appropriate Use in Disclosures

Antiarrhythmic Drugs and Ablation in Patients with ICD and Shocks

SCD-HeFT: The Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial

Arthur J. Moss, MD Professor of Medicine/Cardiology University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester, NY. DISCLOSURE INFORMATION Arthur J.

Abbreviation List: 2017 by the American Heart Association, Inc. and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. 1

National Medical Policy

ARRHYTHMIAS AND DEVICE THERAPY

Polypharmacy - arrhythmic risks in patients with heart failure

Wearable Devices for Heart Disease, Diabetes and Health

Controversies in Cardiac Pharmacology

Program Metrics. New Unique ID. Old Unique ID. Metric Set Metric Name Description. Old Metric Name

Cardiovascular Nursing Practice: A Comprehensive Resource Manual and Study Guide for Clinical Nurses 2 nd Edition

All in the Past? Win K. Shen, MD Mayo Clinic Arizona Controversies and Advances in CV Diseases Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, MFMER

Continuous ECG telemonitoring with implantable devices: the expected clinical benefits

Consensus Core Set: Cardiovascular Measures Version 1.0

Supplementary Online Content

Revascularization for Patients with HFrEF: CABG and PCI and the Concept of Myocardial Viability

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

» A new drug s trial

Medical Policy Manual. Topic: Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillators as a Bridge to Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Placement

Title: Automatic External Defibrillators Division: Medical Management Department: Utilization Management

The Counter HF Clinical Study for Heart Failure

Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy

Heart Failure Overview. Dr Chris K Y Wong

Automatic External Defibrillators

Hanna K. Al-Makhamreh, M.D., FACC Interventional Cardiologist

Arrhythmia in Acute Coronary Syndrome. E. Pruvot, MD, CHUV

Wearable Devices Emerging Strategies for Patient Management

CHRONIC HEART FAILURE : WHAT ELSE COULD WE OFFER TO OUR PATIENTS? Cardiac Rehabilitation Society of Thailand

DISCLOSURES ACHIEVING SUCCESS THROUGH FAILURE: UPDATE ON HEART FAILURE WITH PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION NONE

THE ROLE OF ICD THERAPY FOR PRIMARY PREVENTION Leonard Ganz, M.D. Pittsburgh, PA

Ventricular tachycardia and ischemia. Martin Jan Schalij Department of Cardiology Leiden University Medical Center

Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure

Re: National Coverage Analysis (NCA) for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (CAG R4)

Prophylactic ablation

Medical Policy An Independent Licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

8:30-10:30 WS #4: Cardiology :00-13:00 WS #11: Cardiology 101 (Repeated)

MEDICAL POLICY Cardioverter Defibrillators

Heart Failure Medical and Surgical Treatment

2017 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With ST-Elevation and Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Randomized Trial to Optimize the Dose and Efficacy of Beta-Blocker in Systolic Heart Failure: Japanese Chronic Heart Failure (J-CHF) Study

Chapter 8: Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with ESRD

Supplementary material 1. Definitions of study endpoints (extracted from the Endpoint Validation Committee Charter) 1.

Unknown ECGs for the Clinician

Patient characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of followup

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

Early Experience of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Results from the Intrepid Global Pilot Study

The Failing Heart in Primary Care

Clinical Investigations

Randomized comparison of single versus double mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 5 year outcomes of the Arterial Revascularization Trial

ICD deactivation Patient Journey

InterQual Care Planning SIM plus Criteria 2014 Clinical Revisions

Neprilysin Inhibitor (Entresto ) Prior Authorization and Quantity Limit Program Summary

Policy #: 168 Latest Review Date: October 2014

Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3 (MOMENTUM 3) Long Term Outcomes

Heart Failure Treatments

New evidences in heart failure: the GISSI-HF trial. Aldo P Maggioni, MD ANMCO Research Center Firenze, Italy

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO

IMPLANTABLE DEVICE THERAPY FOR HEART FAILURE

ESC Stockholm Arrhythmias & pacing

Congestive Heart Failure: Outpatient Management

IHCP bulletin INDIANA HEALTH COVERAGE PROGRAMS BT JANUARY 24, 2012

Transcription:

ACC Late Breaking Clinical Trials 2018 Vest Prevention of Early Sudden Death Trial (VEST) Jeffrey Olgin, MD, FACC Division of Cardiology, UCSF On behalf of the VEST Investigators

Disclosures ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01446965 Funding NHLBI (U01HL089458 & U01HL089145) funded Coordinating Centers until 2012 funded study throughout and Coordinating Centers after 2012

Background: SCD is high after MI Olmsted County VALIANT Trial Cumulative Incidence Death Sudden cardiac death Rate of Sudden Cardiac Death or Cardiac Arrest (%/mo) Time to Event (year) Months after Myocardial Infarction (mo) Adabag, et al. JAMA 2008 VALIANT Solomon, et al. NEJM 2005

Background: No benefit from early ICD Total Mortality DINAMIT ICD group Control group Total Mortality IRIS ICD group Control group SCD Mortality Control group ICD group DINAMIT: Hohnloser, et al. NEJM 2004 IRIS: Steinbeck, et al. NEJM 2009 Cumulative Risk of Death from Arrhythmia Cumulative Risk of Death from Any Cause Cumulative Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death Cumulative Risk of Death from Any Cause SCD Mortality Control group ICD group

Background: No benefit from early ICD Total Mortality DINAMIT ICD group Control group Total Mortality IRIS ICD group Control group SCD Mortality Control group ICD group DINAMIT: Hohnloser, et al. NEJM 2004 IRIS: Steinbeck, et al. NEJM 2009 Cumulative Risk of Death from Arrhythmia Cumulative Risk of Death from Any Cause Cumulative Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death Cumulative Risk of Death from Any Cause SCD Mortality Control group ICD group

Background: No benefit from early ICD Cumulative Risk of Death from Any Cause Total Mortality DINAMIT ICD group Cumulative Risk of Death from Any Cause ICD group 1 Outcome: Long-term Control group (>30 month) mortality Control group N = 674 Total Mortality IRIS N = 898 Cumulative Risk of Death from Arrhythmia SCD Mortality Control group ICD group Cumulative Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death SCD Mortality Control group ICD group DINAMIT: Hohnloser, et al. NEJM 2004 IRIS: Steinbeck, et al. NEJM 2009

Background: Guideline recommendations Al-Khatib SM, et al. 2017 VA/SCD Guidelines 6.1.2. Primary Prevention of SCD in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease Recommendations for Primary Prevention of SCD in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease COR I LOE A Recommendations 1. InpatientswithLVEFof35%orlessthatisduetoischemicheartdiseasewho are at least 40 days post-mi and at least 90 days post revascularization, and with NYHA class II or III HF despite GDMT, an ICD is recommended if meaningful survival of greater than 1 year is expected(1,2). 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias. JACC 2017

Background: VEST rationale ICD not indicated in immediate post-mi period Some early mortality not due to arrhythmias immediately post-mi, thus not preventable by ICD LVEF may recover over 3 months post-mi Can a wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) reduce SD mortality in the immediate post-mi period (<90 days) in patients with reduced LVEF, as a bridge to evaluation for ICD?

Methods: Study design Multi-center, randomized, open-label trial Participants enrolled within 7 days of hospital d/c with acute MI and EF 35% Randomized 2:1 to receive: Wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) + guidelinedirected therapy or Guideline-directed medical therapy alone MD s & sites blinded to detected arrhythmias Crossovers & ICDs prohibited (except for secondary prevention during follow-up)

Methods: Inclusion & exclusion Inclusion Criteria 7 days of hospital discharge for acute MI EF 35% assessed: 8 hrs after MI 8 hrs after PCI 48 hrs after CABG Exclusion Criteria Existing ICD Significant valve disease Unipolar pacing system Chronic hemodialysis Chest too small/large for WCD Discharge to SNF for >7 days Pregnancy

Methods: Screening & enrollment Screening & enrollment between 2008 2017 108 enrolling sites 76 US sites 6 German sites 24 Polish sites 2 Hungarian sites Alaska Germany United States Poland Hungary

Methods: Intervention-WCD Washable- Interchangeable Garment Self-Gelling Defibrillation Electrodes Dry ECG Electrodes Rechargeable Monitor & Battery Pack Response Buttons Monitors Wear-time Noise Device warning Asystole VT/VF Treatment VT/VF Investigators blinded to data

Methods: Outcomes Follow-up at 1 month & 3 months Search NDI at end of study Primary Outcome: SCD & death due to ventricular arrhythmias Secondary outcomes Total mortality & Non-sudden death Cause-specific death Non-fatal outcomes CV Hospitalizations WCD compliance Adverse events

Methods: Analysis plan Primary Analysis: Intention-to-treat Participants with indeterminate causes of death or unknown vital status are treated as not having primary outcome Secondary Analyses Weighted sensitivity analyses excluding unknown vital status and indeterminate causes of death from denominator

Results: CONSORT diagram Died Prior to Consent (n=797) Refused (n=546) WCD + Guideline Rx (n=1,524) Received WCD (n=1,481) Never wore WCD (n=43) ICD implant during FU (n=67) Analyzed (n=1524) Vital status unknown (n=10) Assessed for Eligibility (n=13,774) Randomized (n=2,302) 2:1 Excluded (n=10,129) Existing ICD (n=2,158) Chronic Renal Failure (n=1,148) Discharge to SNF (n=740) Unipolar pacing system (n=160) Chest too large/small (n=76) Significant valve disease (n=102) Pregnancy (n=8) Inability to consent (n=1,327) Unsuitable/Other (n=4,364) Guideline Rx (n=778) Never given WCD (n=758) Given WCD-protocol viol (n=20) ICD implant during FU (n=44) Mean Follow-up = 84.3 ± 15.6 days Analyzed (n=778) Vital status unknown (n=12)

Results: Participant characteristics Characteristic WCD Group (N=1524) Control Group (N=778) Age, mean ± SD 60.9 ± 12.6 61.4 ± 12.3 Men, n (%) 1107 (72.8%) 577 (74.7%) Body mass index, Mean ± SD 28.4 ± 5.5 28.6 ± 6.6 Smoker, n(%) 561 (36.9%) 273 (35.5%) Race n (%) White 1278 (84.1%) 636 (82.6%) Black 143 (9.4%) 75 (9.7%) Asian 23 (1.5%) 14 (1.8%) Native American/Alaskan 25 (1.7%) 12 (1.6%) Pacific Islander/Hawaiian 1 (0.1%) 0 (0%) Mixed 20 (1.3%) 14 (1.8%) Hispanic, n (%) 85 (5.6%) 34 (4.4%)

Results: Prior history Characteristic WCD Group (N=1524) Control Group (N=778) Diabetes Mellitus, n (%) 496 (32.6%) 246 (31.7%) Hypertension, n(%) 993 (65.3%) 501 (64.6%) Prior MI, n (%) 380 (25.1%) 193 (24.9%) Prior CABG, n (%) 133 (8.8%) 70 (9.0%) Prior PCI, n (%) 374 (24.6%) 202 (26.0%) Prior CHF, n (%) 246 (16.2%) 146 (18.9%) NYHA Classification, n (%) I 691 (45.5%) 326 (42.1%) II 528 (34.8%) 286 (36.9%) III 211 (13.9%) 116 (15.0%) IV 46 (3.0%) 18 (2.3%)

Results: Characteristics of index MI Characteristic WCD Group (N=1524) Control Group (N=778) LVEF 28.2 ± 6.1% 28.2 ± 5.9% PCI during MI hospitalization 1272 (84.2%) 650 (84.1%) Thrombolytics during MI hospitalization 118 (7.8%) 71 (9.2%) CABG during index hospitalization 14 (0.9%) 12 (1.5%) Cardiac Arrest/VF 169 (11.2%) 70 (9.1%) Pulmonary Edema requiring Intubation 162 (10. 7%) 88 (11.4%) Intra-aortic Balloon Pump 173 (11.5%) 93 (12.0%) Cardiogenic Shock 136 (9.0%) 79 (10.2%)

Results: Medical treatment Characteristic WCD Group (N=1524) Control Group (N=778) ASA 1328 (87.1%) 677 (87.0%) Other antiplatelet 1378 (90.4%) 679 (87.3%) Statin 1384 (90.8%) 695 (89.3%) Beta blocker (including carvedilol) 1407 (92.3%) 716 (92.0%) ACEI/ARB 1330 (87.3%) 665 (85.5%) Eplerenone/spironolactone 661 (43.4%) 342 (44.0%) Other diuretic 736 (48.3%) 384 (49.4%) Amiodarone 106 (7.0%) 55 (7.1%)

Results: Crossover treatment Characteristic WCD Group (N=1524) Control Group (N=778) WCD received, n (%) 1455 (95.5%) 20 (2.6%)* Average hours/day WCD worn 14.1 ± 9.3 0.8 ± 3.9* ICD during follow up (<90 days), n (%) 67 (4.4%) 44 (5.7%) ICD Implant timing (days since randomization), median (IQR) 62 (24-81) 58 (25-77) *P <0.001

Results: WCD wear-time Percent (%) Mean Hrs worn 100 80 60 40 20 0 24 18 12 6 0 Percent using WCD, by day Hours worn/day (incl non-users) 0 15 30 45 60 75 90 Days since randomization Mean Hrs worn when used 24 18 12 6 0 Hours worn on days used Observed Smoothed 95% Confidence Interval 0 15 30 45 60 75 90 Days since randomization

Results: Outcomes, intention-to-treat A Sudden + Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Death Control WCD

Results: Outcomes, intention-to-treat B Non-sudden Death Control WCD

Results: Outcomes, intention-to-treat C Death from Any Cause Log-rank P=0.04 Control WCD 35.5% RR reduction

Results: Cause-specific death Clinical event type WCD (N=1524) Control (N=778) P value* FATAL EVENTS, n (%) Sudden Death (1 outcome) 25 (1.6%) 19 (2.4%) 0.18 Non-sudden death 21 (1.4%) 17 (2.2%) 0.15 Congestive heart failure death 10 (0.7%) 5 (0.6%) 1.0 Recurrent MI death 1 (0.1%) 1 (0.1%) 1.0 Stroke death 0 (0.0%) 4 (0.5%) 0.01 Other cardiovascular death 5 (0.3%) 3 (0.4%) 1.0 Other death 5 (0.3%) 4 (0.5%) 0.72 Indeterminate death 2 (0.1%) 2 (0.3%) 0.83 Death, any cause 48 (3.1%) 38 (4.9%) 0.04 NON-FATAL EVENTS, n (%) Rehospitalization, cardiovascular 334 (22%) 174 (22%) 0.81 Rehospitalization, any cause 475 (31%) 253 (33%) 0.51

Results: WCD therapies & events Therapies Appropriate shocks (p=0.002) WCD Group (N=1524) Control Group (N=778) 1 appropriate shock 13 (0.9%) 0 (0%) 2 appropriate shocks 7 (0.5%) 1 (0.1%) Inappropriate shocks (p=0.05) 1 inappropriate shock 8 (0.5%) 0 (0%) 2 inappropriate shocks 2 (0.1%) 0 (0%) Aborted shocks (p<0.001) 1 aborted shock 43 (2.8%) 0 (0%) 2 aborted shocks 12 (0.8%) 0 (0%) >5 aborted shocks 15 (1.0%) 0 (0%)

Results: Pre-specified symptoms Characteristics WCD Control P value Fatigue 36.0% 38.8% 0.21 Back pain 20.0% 19.4% 0.73 Trouble sleeping 39.0% 37.3% 0.47 Dizziness 24.3% 23.5% 0.66 Fainting 4.2% 5.1% 0.34 Nausea 9.4% 12.0% 0.06 Headache 18.3% 19.1% 0.66 Palpitations 23.1% 25.7% 0.18 Chest pain 18.7% 21.4% 0.14 Shortness of breath 38.7% 45.4% 0.003 Rash in any location 15.2% 7.1% <0.001 Rash on torso 12.9% 3.8% <0.001 Itch in any location 17.2% 6.4% <0.001 Itch on torso 14.5% 3.1% <0.001

Discussion: Sudden death outcome Possible misclassification of sudden deaths Reducing power for SD outcome but not total mortality 14 of 20 participants who received an appropriate shock survived to 90 days WCD may confer additional protection beyond SD Earlier care for bradycardia, NSVT or aborted shocks Lower stroke death in WCD group Reduced anxiety or increased medication compliance More shortness of breath in controls

Discussion: Limitations Participants and investigators not blinded Differences in shortness of breath between groups No differences in prescribing guideline-directed Rx Crossovers 20 participants in Control group received the WCD 19% in WCD group did not use the WCD Should bias results toward the null, but still found a difference in total mortality

Conclusions The WCD did not statistically significantly reduce sudden death mortality The WCD did reduce total mortality in the first 90 days post-mi in patients with LVEF 35% Relative risk reduction of 35.5% VEST represents the first randomized, controlled trial of the WCD Prescribing the WCD is reasonable to protect high-risk patients with a low LVEF post-mi until evaluation for an ICD at 40-90 days

Thank you