Pesticide Analysis using an Agilent 9 Infinity L System with an Agilent 6 Single Quadrupole L/MS System Application ote Environmental Author Rob Sample Littleover Derby, DE X, UK Edgar aegele Agilent Technologies Waldbronn, Germany Abstract This Application ote describes the use of the Agilent 9 Infinity L system in combination with the Agilent 6 Single Quadrupole L/MS system for cost-effective L/MS analysis of pesticides in clean to moderately dirty water samples such as river water or drinking water. A separation method for the analysis of water samples with relatively clean matrices such as those that might be prepared by a simple concentration and cleanup step using a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge was developed. This demonstrates how the run time for such a method can be shortened. Introduction In pesticide analysis literature, there are many examples of liquid chromatography combined with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. While these techniques are extremely sensitive for detecting pesticides in dirty matrices such as soil or crop extracts the single quadrupole MS detector is a more cost-effective method for the analysis of clean to moderately dirty samples such as drinking water or river water. Addition of a single quadrupole MS detector to a UV diode array detector-based system is a common first step into mass spectrometric detection. This Application ote develops a separation method for the analysis of water samples with relatively clean matrices, prepared by a simple concentration and cleanup step using a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge. It also demonstrates how the run time for this method can be shortened. Simple techniques for converting methods to faster methods are illustrated.
Experimental All analyses were performed using the Agilent 9 Infinity L system including binary pump, autosampler, thermostatted column compartment and diode array detector in series with the Agilent 6 Single Quadrupole L/MS system equipped with an atmospheric pressure electrospray ionization (AP- ESI) source. Agilent ZRBAX Rapid Resolution igh Definition (RRD),.8 µm columns were used with the Agilent 9 Infinity L system. The column dimensions were chosen to handle operating pressures up to bar. For the initial method development, an Agilent ZR- BAX StableBond 8 RRD mm. mm,.8 µm column was chosen. Samples A standard mixture containing ng/µl each of 7 pesticides in acetonitrile solution was obtained from Dr. Ehrenstorfer Gmb (Pesticide Mix, part no. 8 - Dr. Ehrenstorfer Gmb Bgm.-Schlosser-Str. 6 A, 8699 Augsburg, Germany). Aliquots of this solution were diluted to % with water to prepare standards containing ng/µl ( ppm) of each component for development of the separation method. The mixture contained herbicides from the triazine, phenylurea and chloroacetanilide classes. The components are listed in Table. These components are all expected to form positive ions under the acidic conditions of the mobile phase. Results and discussion Standard method development An Agilent ZRBAX StableBond 8 RRD mm. mm,.8 µm column was chosen for the separation method development. onditions were adjusted to obtain a target analysis of the 7 components in about utes. Formic acid (.% v/v) was added to the acetonitrile/water mobile phase m/z [M+] + m/z Structure omponent [M+] + Structure omponent Atrazinedesethyl 88 Methabenzthiazuron (also known as methibenzuron) Atrazine 6 Metobromuron 59 hlorotoluron Metolachlor 8 yanazine Metoxuron 9 Diuron Monolinuron 5 exazinone 5 Sebuthylazine Isoproturon 7 Simazine Linuron 9 Terbuthylazine Metazachlor 78 Table omponents in pesticide test mixture. to promote positive ion formation for mass spectrometric detection using the atmospheric pressure electrospray source. S Br Fifteen of the seventeen components were separated in utes with the remaining two (diuron and isoproturon), coeluting at about 5.8 utes. An advantage of using the mass spectrometric detector is that two overlapping peaks may be separated by their mass/charge (m/z) ratios into different chromatograms. The maximum pressure observed during the gradient separation was 56 bar, which is well within the operating range of bar. Table shows the peak assignments and Table summarizes the L/MS method conditions used in this Application ote.
The Agilent 6 Single Quadrupole L/MS system can output four chromatographic signals simultaneously (MSD to MSD). MSD was set to scan mode so that the mass spectrum of each peak in the resulting total ion current (TI) chromatogram (Figure ), could be used to verify that molecular ions ([M+] + ) were produced for each component in order to identify and quantify the peaks. igh quality spectra were obtained for all components and two examples are shown in Figures a and b. For quantification of components, the use of TIs from selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode yields higher selectivity and much higher sensitivity than in scan mode because the mass detector spends more time in each measurement cycle collecting ions at a specified mass/charge (m/z) ratio. A signal in SIM mode can be used to monitor a number of discrete masses for greater flexibility. The coeluting peaks can be separated by appropriate use of SIM signals or by extracted ion chromatograms (EI) for individual ion m/z values. In this case, m/z 7 and signify isoproturon and diuron (Figure ). The expanded section of the TI chromatogram overlaid with the extracted ion chromatograms in Figure allows closer exaation of the coeluting compounds. The selected mass spectra of diuron and isoproturon are shown in Figures a and b. The spectrum of diuron (Figure a) shows a good resolution of the isotope pattern of this doubly chlorinated compound and allows clear differentiation from the isotopic pattern of the non-chlorinated coeluting compound isoproturon (Figure b). 5 5 5 5.789...5 Figure hromatogram of the pesticide mixture. 5 5 5 6.877.989 5. 5. 5.89 5.65 6. 7.77 6.777 7.77 7.96 9. 6 8 EI Diuron 5.87 6 8 5.89 EI 7 Isoproturon 6 8 Figure Extracted ion chromatograms EI and EI 7 for the pesticide mixture..5.5 5.65 5.87 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 6 6. 6. 5.89 5.89 6. Figure Detail view of coeluting diuron and isoproturon peaks showing the scan TI and extracted ion chromatograms overlaid.
Peak Retention m/z umber omponent (s) [M+]+ Atrazine-desethyl.79 88 Metoxuron. 9 exazinone. 5 Simazine.5 5 yanazine.878 6 Methabenzthiazuron.99 7 hlorotoluron 5. 8 Atrazine 5.6 6 9 Monolinuron 5.66 5 * Diuron 5.87 * Isoproturon 5.89 7 Metobromuron 6. 59 Metazachlor 6.777 78 Sebuthylazine 7.8 5 Terbuthylazine 7.77 6 Linuron 7.96 9 7 Metolachlor 9. 8 * Diuron and isoproturon coelute Table Peak assignments. Development of a fast method using a mm column Agilent ZRBAX 8 RRD.8 µm stationary phase material offers high efficiency separations and supports faster flow rates due to the flatter Van Deemter profile associated with the small particle size. The - method was converted to a 5- method by doubling the flow rate to. ml/ and adjusting the gradient time (halving it) to keep the same gradient steepness in terms of the number of column volumes passing through the column during the gradient (Figure 5). m/z = Diuron Max: 976 8 6 5 A Figure a Mass Spectrum of Diuron. 8 6 B 7. 6.. 5. 6. 55. 75 5 5 75 m/z = 7 Isoproturon 6 8 6 8 Figure b Mass Spectrum of Isoproturon. 8. 7. Max:.55e+6 Agilent 9 Infinity L/UV onditions olumn Agilent ZRBAX RRD SB-8. mm mm,.8 µm olumn Agilent ZRBAX RRD SB-8. mm 5 mm,.8 µm olumn Temperature Mobile Phase A Water +.% formic acid Mobile Phase B Acetonitrile +.% formic acid hromatogram shown in: Figure Figure 5 Figure 7 Figure 8 olumn Length mm mm 5 mm 5 mm Flow Rate.5 ml/. ml/.5 ml/. ml/ Mobile Phase Gradient: % B.... % B 6.5.5.5.6 7% B. 5. 5..5 Injection Volume µl µl 5 µl 5 µl Injection eedle Wash In Flush Port, s, acetonitrile/water (5/5) Diode-array Detector Signal A nm, bandwidth nm. Reference ff. Diode-array Detector Signal B 6 nm, bandwidth nm. Reference ff Spectrograph Slit Width nm Agilent 6 Single Quadrupole MS Detector onditions Ion source Atmospheric pressure electrospray (API-ESI) Ion polarity Positive apillary Voltage V Drying gas flow L/ Drying gas temperature 5 ebulizer pressure psi @.5 ml/; 5 psi @. ml/ MSD Signal Scan m/z 5 5 MSD Signal SIM m/z 88,, 7, 6,, 9, 9, 78 (5 ms dwell each) MSD Signal SIM m/z, 5,,,, 5, 59, 8 (5 ms dwell each) Fragmentor voltage 9 V, all signals m/z m/z Table Agilent 9 Infinity L/UV conditions.
The relationship between gradient steepness and flow is shown in the following equation.5.5.5.9.578.76.777.9.69.5.56.759.98.5.5.5.89.95.598 where: Δ%B is the range of the stronger mobile phase component across the gradient V M is the delay volume of the column, or the volume of mobile phase in the column F is the flow rate t G is the time range (duration) of the gradient. This is linked to the concept of gradient retention factor, k* in the following equation, and illustrates how a constant gradient steepness keeps the relative spacing of the peaks constant: S is a compound-specific factor for each solute. As expected, the overall appearance of the chromatogram is the same but the retention times are half of the original. oser exaation reveals some slight selectivity changes. The diuron and isoproturon coelution peak at.9 utes shows a distinct shoulder indicating slightly more separation between these two compounds. Peaks 6 and 7 now slightly overlap (compare to Figure ). Because the gradient slope remained constant, it is concluded that frictional heating is generated from the flow rate and pressure. The separation was run at temperatures ranging from to 5 to test the effect of temperature variation. As expected, the general.5.5.5.5.5 5.5.5.5.5.5 6.9.578.578.77.778.9.5.5.5.5.5 trend was to reduce retention as temperature increased. It can also be seen that the selectivity between various peak pairs is temperature sensitive. The following changes in selectivity were noted as the temperature increased: methabenzthiazuron and chlortoluron (peaks 6 and 7) decreased; chlortoluron and atrazine (peaks 7 and 8) increased; diuron and isoproturon (peaks and ) increased; and terbuthylazine and linuron (peaks 5 and 6) decreased. The selectivity change observed in changing the flow rate and pressure may be indicated by a frictional heating effect. This can be estimated by empirical comparison at to. In this case the effect could be offset by lowering the thermostat temperature by - as reported elsewhere. Frictional heating can cause band broadening if a radial temperature gradient is created in the column. This is influenced by the type of thermostatting employed in the system. The design of.5.56.68.757.98.759.9.5 Figure 5 Pesticide mixture separated on mm column in a 5 gradient at ml/ flow rate..56.56.8.96.599 the 9 Infinity L column compartment takes care to avoid this. Therefore no extra dispersion was indicated by the observed peak widths. Increasing the temperature, which reduces the viscosity of the mobile phase causes an observed difference in pressure readings (for example, bar at and 9 bar at 5 ). This effect is often used to create more headroom for pressure and flow rate increases (Figure 6). 5
Development of a fast method using a 5 mm column Agilent ZRBAX 8 RRD.8 µm columns offer high efficiency separations. Exaation of the mm column resolution data suggests that the separation is also adequate on a 5 mm column with the same packing material. Transferring a method from a mm column to a 5 mm column follows the same approach as discussed above. Because the stationary phase is identical, the separation should be the same as long as the gradient is the same. The flow rate remains the same and because the column is half the length the peaks will elute in half the time. To maintain gradient slope, the time steps (t G ) in the timetable are divided by because the column volume (V M ) is divided by. The - method on the mm column is reduced to a 5- method on the 5 mm column..5.5.5.5.5 5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5 5.5.5.5.5.5 Figure 6 Effect of temperature on the separation: hromatograms at (pressure, ΔP = bar), 5 (ΔP = 5 bar), (ΔP = 97 bar), and 5 (ΔP = 9 bar)..5.5.9.5.67.768.96.6.58.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.5.9.55.68.55.769.95.5.5.5.5.5 Figure 7 Pesticide mixture separated on 5 mm column in a 5 gradient at.5 ml/ flow rate..6.58.658.659.796.96.9.799.89.86.86.5.5.58.58.865.865.99.9.6.65 The resulting chromatogram is shown in Figure 7. It is similar to the chromatogram shown in Figure for the mm column. It can be expected that the efficiency of the column measured in the number of theoretical plates () under isocratic conditions will be reduced by a factor of for the 5 mm column compared to the mm column. The effect on resolution is a factor of about.5 and it can be seen from the experimental results in Table that peak width, resolution and peak capacity number are reduced by this factor. The most critical resolution for peaks separated in the scan chromatogram is between peaks and 5 with a resolution of.. owever, the two peaks are totally separated by use of the SIM signals. The maximum separation pressure reached in the separation using the 5 mm column was 9 bar compared with 55 bar for the mm column. Although 9 bar is attainable on a conventional ( bar) PL system such as the Agilent PL system, the increased system delay volume intro 6
duces a longer isocratic delay at the start of the gradient. In addition, increased dispersion in the larger flow cell reduces resolution. As with the mm column, the same technique of increasing the flow rate and reducing the gradient times to maintain gradient slope was employed. Figure 8 shows the chromatogram at ml/ and.5 utes gradient for the 5 mm column with an observed maximum pressure of 55 bar. While the scan TI chromatogram shows some loss of resolution, the SIM chromatograms still give good separation for all peaks. The maximum pressure ( bar) of the Agilent 9 Infinity L allows the flow rate to be increased by a factor of two. The electrospray source has a maximum flow rate of ml/, however, so additionial increases require the use of a flow splitter to maintain good MS detection. mm column, gradient,.5 ml/ 5 mm column, 5 gradient,.5 ml/ Ret Resol- Peak Ret Resol- Peak Peak Time Width ution apacity Time Width ution apacity.789. 7.9...6 8. 6.5....6.7 6.67..7.5.5.6.768.7. 99 5.877.5.8 5.96.5.6 7 6.989.5.7.6.6 9. 7 5..5.6 7.58.5. 7 8 5..5. 8.658.8.9 99 9 5.65.5. 5.796.. 9 5.89.6.7 7.96..6 85 6..9. 5.86.7.6 6.777.65 5.7 6.5..9 86 7.77.6.8.58.. 9 7.77.55 7. 6.865.7 5. 5 7.96.5.8 6.99.. 9 6 9..7 6. 59.6..8 Table omparison of peak parameters on mm and 5 mm columns. 5 8.7.785.85.9.97.9.77..9.65.5.678.766.95.95 Area:.77886e+6 Area: 7.5.5.5.75.5.5.75.5.5.5.75.5.5.75.5.7.786.785.86.9.97.5.5.75.5.5.75.5.5.78..87.9.5.67.5.678.766.96.96.5 Figure 8 Pesticide mixture separated on 5 mm column in.5 utes gradient at ml/ flow rate. 7
onclusion This Application ote shows a method for the separation of a mixture of common herbicides from the triazine, phenylurea and chloroacetanilide classes in less than utes using a high efficiency sub--µm column with the Agilent 9 Infinity L system and Agilent 6 Single Quadrupole L/MS system. Several aspects of UPL method development, including frictional heating effects, are highlighted. Using normal method transfer techniques it is shown that this separation using MS detection can be accelerated to complete in less than.5 utes. Reference. Pat Sandra, "Increasing productivity in the analysis of impurities in meto clopramide hydrochloride formula tions using the Agilent 9 Infinity L system", Agilent Application ote 599-98E, 9. www.agilent.com/chem/9 Agilent Technologies, Inc., May, Publication umber 599-579E