Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Similar documents
Long-Term Follow-up of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance

Serum free light chain ratio as a biomarker for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma

Session Chair: Kenneth C. Anderson, MD Speakers: S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD; Peter Leif Bergsagel, MD; and Donna E. Reece, MD

Smoldering Myeloma: Leave them alone!

Serum Levels of Free Light Chain before and after Chemotherapy in Primary Systemic AL Amyloidosis

Multiple myeloma Biological & Clinical Aspects Isabelle Vande Broek, MD, PhD

A.M.W. van Marion. H.M. Lokhorst. N.W.C.J. van de Donk. J.G. van den Tweel. Histopathology 2002, 41 (suppl 2):77-92 (modified)

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Leukemia. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 July 1.

Forms Revision: Myeloma Changes

Laboratory Examination

Analysis of Free Serum Light Chains in Patients Suffering from Multiple Myeloma Complicated by Light-Chain Amyloidosis

Serum Free Light Chains should be the target of response evaluation in light chain myeloma rather than urines: results from the IFM 2009 trial

Importancia del laboratorio en el seguimiento clínico de pacientes con mieloma múltiple

SWOG ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROFESSIONAL (ORP) MANUAL RESPONSE ASSESSMENT MYELOMA CHAPTER 11C REVISED: SEPTEMBER 2016

Multiple myeloma evolves from a clinically silent premalignant

Instructions for Plasma Cell Disorders (PCD) Post-HCT Data (Form 2116 Revision 3)

M-Protien, what to do next? Ismail A Sharif MD, FRCPc Internal Medicine Day 22 nd April 2016

Jo Abraham MD Division of Nephrology University of Utah

Role of Suppressed Immunoglobulins in Outcome of Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Serum free light chain (SFLC) assays. Dr Sarah Sasson SydPath Registrar

V. Smoldering multiple myeloma

Review of the recent publications from the French group of myeloma on urine vs serum FLC analysis in MM

Malcolm P. McTaggart, PhD, 1 Jindriska Lindsay, FRCPath, 2 and Edward M. Kearney, FRCPath 1 ABSTRACT

Should some patients with Smoldering Myeloma receive treatment? Yes-High Risk SMM should S. Vincent Rajkumar Professor of Medicine Mayo Clinic

Multiple Myeloma 101: Understanding Your Labs

Hematology 101. Rachid Baz, M.D. 5/16/2014

Review Article Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 9: , 2015

Risk stratification of smoldering multiple myeloma: predictive value of free light chains and group-based trajectory modeling

Case #1. Robert J. Glinert, M.D. David C. Fisher, M.D. Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Should we treat Smoldering MM patients? María-Victoria Mateos University Hospital of Salamanca Salamanca. Spain

Smoldering Multiple Myeloma. A Case Study

Survival and prognostic factors after initiation of treatment in Waldenstrom s macroglobulinemia

Successful Treatment of Immunoglobulin D Myeloma by Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Therapy

Southern Derbyshire Shared Care Pathology Guidelines. MGUS (Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance)

Tracking Disease Status for Multiple Myeloma

Amyloidosis: What to do and how to diagnose: An Update 2017

Expanding Spectrum of Diseases Associated with Plasma Cell Dyscrasias

Plasma Cell Disorders (PCD) Pre-HCT Data

Supplementary Appendix

2016: Plasma Cell Disorders Pre-HCT Data

Relationship between elevated immunoglobulin free light chain and the presence of IgH translocations in multiple myeloma

Bisphosphonates in the Management of. Myeloma Bone Disease

The New England Journal of Medicine

Criteria for Disease Assessment Joan Bladé

Multiple Myeloma: A Review of 92 Cases at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

I nuovi fa*ori di classificazione e di rischio del Mieloma smouldering.

P53 Gene Deletion Detected By Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization is an Adverse

Anaemias and other Pesky Haematology Questions

Persistence of Myeloma Protein for More than One Year after Radiotherapy Is an Adverse Prognostic Factor in Solitary Plasmacytoma of Bone

Myeloma Support Group: Now and the Horizon. Brian McClune, DO

Lec-14 د.خالد نافع. Medicine. Multiple Myeloma

SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX

The risk of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Plasma cell myeloma (multiple myeloma)

Hevylite assays de - convoluted. Dr Karthik Ramasamy Oxford University Hospitals

Smouldering Myeloma: to treat or not to treat?

Investigative Tools for Diagnosis and Management

Monoclonal gammopathies consist of. Monoclonal GammopathyeAssociated Proliferative Glomerulonephritis REVIEW

The ABCs of Waldenström s Macroglobulinemia (WM)

Noha M. El Husseiny, Neemat Kasem, Hamdy Abd El Azeeim & Mervat W. Mattar

Understanding the Serum Free Light Chain Assays. Anne L Sherwood, PhD Director of Scientific Affairs The Binding Site, Inc.

WALDENSTROM S macroglobulinemia (WM) is a

MYE FORMS REVEALED RESPONSE CODES OBJECTIVES. Stringent Complete Response (scr) Complete Response (CR) I have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Center for Amyloidosis and Acute Phase Proteins, University College London Medical School, UK

Burkitt lymphoma. Sporadic Endemic in Africa associated with EBV Translocations involving MYC gene on chromosome 8

Multiple Myeloma: diagnosis and prognostic factors. N Meuleman May 2015

FAMILY MATTERS IN WALDENSTROM MACROGLOBULINEMIA by Mary McMaster, MD

Management of Multiple Myeloma

Update: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Tarek ElBaz, MD. Prof. Internal Medicine Chief, Division of Renal Medicine Al Azhar University President, ESNT

Prognostic value of bone marrow angiogenesis in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing high-dose therapy

Module 3: Multiple Myeloma Induction and Transplant Strategies Treatment Planning

Restless Legs Syndrome in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Hematology Case Conference 8/5/03

1210 Vol. 11, , February 1, 2005 Clinical Cancer Research

Case Report Biclonal IgD and IgM Plasma Cell Myeloma: A Report of Two Cases and a Literature Review

Medical Policy Title: HDC Progenitor Cell ARBenefits Approval: 02/08/2012

Supplementary Appendix

Extramedullary Presentation of Biclonal IgGk and IgAk Multiple Myeloma

Cancer Biology 2015;5(4) Multiple myeloma in Africa: review of an under-diagnosed carcinoma

Soluble syndecan-1 at diagnosis and during follow up of multiple myeloma: a single institution study

If unqualified, Complete remission is considered to be Haematological complete remission

Research Article Prognostic Significance of Serum Free Light Chains in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Multiple Myeloma: A Review

If unqualified, Complete remission is considered to be Haematological complete remission

-Heavy Chain Disease Review of 23 Cases

Freelite SFLC in CKD why use a different reference range? Dr Colin Hutchison Nephrologist Hawke s Bay DHB

Multiple Myeloma Advances for clinical pathologists & histopathologists

Original Research Article

Serum Free Light Chain Assay

Lecture Outline Biost 517 Applied Biostatistics I

Monoclonal Gammopathies and the Kidney. Tibor Nádasdy, MD The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

CME Information: Multiple Myeloma: 2014 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management

Identification of Amyloidogenic Light Chains Requires the Combination of Serum-Free Light Chain Assay with Immunofixation of Serum and Urine

Multiple myeloma: from diagnosis to treatment

Fracture Risk With Multiple Myeloma: A Population-Based Study

Major Diagnostic Criteria

Osteosclerotic Myeloma (POEMS Syndrome)

Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Transcription:

CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance S. Vincent Rajkumar, Robert A. Kyle, Terry M. Therneau, L. Joseph Melton III, Arthur R. Bradwell, Raynell J. Clark, Dirk R. Larson, Matthew F. Plevak, Angela Dispenzieri, and Jerry A. Katzmann We hypothesized that the presence of monoclonal free kappa or lambda immunoglobulin light chains in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), as detected by the serum free light chain (FLC) assay increases the risk of progression to malignancy. Of 1384 patients with MGUS from Southeastern Minnesota seen at the Mayo Clinic from 1960 to 1994, baseline serum samples obtained within 30 days of diagnosis were available in 1148. At a median Introduction follow-up of 15 years, malignant progression had occurred in 87 (7.6%) patients. An abnormal FLC ratio (kappa-lambda ratio < 0.26 or > 1.65) was detected in 379 (33%) patients. The risk of progression in patients with an abnormal FLC ratio was significantly higher compared with patients with a normal ratio (hazard ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-5.5; P <.001) and was independent of the size and type of the serum monoclonal (M) protein. Patients with an abnormal serum FLC ratio, non immunoglobulin G (non-igg) MGUS, and a high serum M protein level (> 15 g/l) had a risk of progression at 20 years of 58% (high-risk MGUS) versus 37% with any 2 of these risk factors (high-intermediate risk), 21% with one risk factor (low-intermediate risk), and 5% when none of the risk factors were present (low risk). (Blood. 2005; 106:812-817) 2005 by The American Society of Hematology Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a premalignant plasma cell proliferative disorder found in approximately 3% of the general population 50 years of age and older. 1 The hallmark of MGUS is the presence of a monoclonal immunoglobulin in the serum, commonly referred to as a monoclonal (M) protein. By definition, patients with MGUS have a serum M protein less than 30 g/l, bone marrow plasma cells less than 10%, and no anemia, hypercalcemia, lytic bone lesions, or renal failure that would be indicative of a malignant plasma cell disorder. 2-4 Since MGUS is asymptomatic, diagnosis is usually the result of a screening serum protein electrophoresis performed as part of a diagnostic work up by primary-care providers. MGUS is associated with progression to multiple myeloma or related malignancy at a rate of 1% per year. 5,6 Thus the risk of malignancy for a 50-year-old patient with a 25-year life span is 25%. However, the risk of progression does not diminish even after 25 to 35 years, making lifelong follow-up by primary-care providers necessary in all persons diagnosed with MGUS. 5,7 Since myeloma is incurable and has a median survival of only 3 to 4 years, 8-10 delaying or preventing the progression of MGUS assumes great significance. However, given the potential adverse effects of prophylactic approaches and the duration for which such interventions will be needed, only patients at a high risk for progression can be considered candidates for testing preventive strategies. Conversely, low-risk patients must not be subjected to potentially harmful or expensive tests or preventive interventions. It is therefore important to identify risk factors that can accurately predict the subset of patients with the greatest likelihood of progression. Unfortunately, such risk factors have been very difficult to identify. In a large populationbased study of MGUS, we evaluated more than 13 potential risk factors, but only the size and type of M protein (IgM and IgA subtypes) were predictive of progression. 5 In another study, Cesana and colleagues reported that a bone marrow plasma cell percentage of 6% to 9% carried twice the risk of progression compared with marrow involvement that is 5% or less. 11 Clearly, additional laboratory predictors of progression of MGUS to myeloma are needed. A novel, highly sensitive serum free light chain (FLC) assay is now available for clinical practice. 12 It allows quantitation of free kappa ( ) and lambda ( ) chains (ie, light chains that are not bound to intact immunoglobulin) secreted by plasma cells. An abnormal kappa-lambda FLC ratio indicates an excess of one light chain type versus the other, and is interpreted as a surrogate for clonal expansion based on extensive testing in healthy volunteers, and patients with myeloma, amyloidosis, and renal dysfunction. 13,14 From the Division of Hematology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Biostatistics and Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN; University of Birmingham and The Binding Site Ltd, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Submitted March 15, 2005; accepted April 10, 2005. Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, April 26, 2005; DOI 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1038. Supported in part by research grants CA 107 476 and CA 62 242 from the National Cancer Institute. One of the authors (A.R.B) has declared a financial interest in The Binding Site Ltd, Birmingham, United Kingdom, whose product, the serum free light chain assay, was studied in the present work. S.V.R., R.A.K., J.A.K., A.R.B., and L.J.M.III participated in the study concept, data analysis, study design, and writing of the report; M.F.P., D.R.L., and T.M.T. were involved in data collection, data analysis, and manuscript review; A.D. was involved in data analysis and manuscript review; R.J.C. was involved in performing the free light chain assays, data collection, and manuscript review. An Inside Blood analysis of this article appears in the front of this issue. Reprints: S. Vincent Rajkumar, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734. 2005 by The American Society of Hematology 812 BLOOD, 1 AUGUST 2005 VOLUME 106, NUMBER 3

BLOOD, 1 AUGUST 2005 VOLUME 106, NUMBER 3 PROGNOSIS OF MGUS 813 Table 1. Clinical characteristics of 1148 southeastern Minnesota patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance Characteristic No. patients (%) Sex Male 622 (54) Female 526 (46) Age, y 0-49 66 (6) 50-59 123 (11) 60-69 286 (25) 70 673 (59) Serum monoclonal protein heavy chain type IgG 806 (70) IgA 135 (12) IgM 182 (16) Biclonal 25 (2) Serum monoclonal protein level, g/l 5 287 (25) 6-10 229 (20) 11-20 604 (53) 21-30 28 (2) The assay is performed on automated chemistry analyzers, is widely available, and is commonly used to monitor patients with oligo-secretory or nonsecretory myeloma and primary amyloidosis, as well as patients with the light-chain only form of myeloma. 12,14,15 The presence of a monoclonal FLC in MGUS may be a marker of clonal evolution in the neoplastic plasma cell since it likely indicates a loss of control over the proportion of heavy and light chains synthesized. We undertook this study to test the hypothesis that an abnormal FLC ratio at baseline is a risk factor for the progression of MGUS to malignancy. Materials and methods The study cohort was derived from persons who resided in the 11 counties in southeastern Minnesota who met previously established diagnostic criteria for MGUS at the Mayo Clinic from January 1, 1960, through December 31, 1994. 5 Of 1384 patients with MGUS diagnosed during this period, a cohort whose baseline characteristics, methods of detection, follow-up, and risk of progression have been well described by us earlier, 5 1148 patients who had cryopreserved serum samples collected within 30 days of the MGUS diagnosis were studied. Follow-up was through the review of each patient s complete medical records at the Mayo Clinic. The study was approved by the Mayo Institutional Review Board. The FLC level in serum collected at the time MGUS was first recognized was determined on all 1148 patient samples using the FLC assay (Freelite; The Binding Site, Birmingham, United Kingdom) performed on a Dade-Behring Nephelometer (Deerfield, IL). 12-14 It consists of 2 separate measurements, one to detect free-kappa (normal range, 3.3-19.4 mg/l) and the other to detect free-lambda (normal range, 5.7-26.3 mg/l) light chains. 16 In addition to measuring the absolute levels of FLC, the test also allows the assessment of clonality based on the ratio of kappa-lambda light Figure 1. Risk of progression to myeloma or related disorder in 1148 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. (A) The upper curve illustrates risk of progression of all patients without taking into account competing causes of death. The lower curve illustrates risk of progression after accounting for other competing causes of death. (B) The upper curve illustrates risk of progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in patients with an abnormal serum kappa-lambda FLC ratio ( 0.26 or 1.65). The lower curve illustrates the risk of progression in patients with a normal ratio. Figure 2. Effect of increasingly abnormal FLC ratio on the relative risk of progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to multiple myeloma or related disorder. This figure illustrates that as the serum kappa-lambda FLC ratio becomes increasingly abnormal, the risk of progression increases (A) and that this effect is present even after adjusting for differences in the serum monoclonal protein spike among patients (B). The middle curve in both figures represents relative risk; upper and lower curves represent 95% confidence intervals.

814 RAJKUMAR et al BLOOD, 1 AUGUST 2005 VOLUME 106, NUMBER 3 chain levels (normal reference range, 0.26-1.65). 13 Patients with a kappalambda FLC ratio less than 0.26 are typically defined as having monoclonal lambda FLC and those with ratios greater than 1.65 are defined as having a monoclonal kappa FLC. If the FLC ratio is greater than 1.65, kappa is considered to be the involved FLC and lambda the uninvolved FLC, and vice versa if the ratio is less than 0.26. The normal reference range of 0.26 to 1.65 for the free-kappa lambda ratio in the FLC assay reflects a higher serum level of free-lambda light chains than would be expected given the usual kappa-lambda ratio of 2 for intact immunoglobulins. This occurs because the renal excretion of free kappa (which exists usually in a monomeric state) is much faster than free lambda (which is usually in a dimeric state). 13,14 FLCs The prognostic effect of abnormal kappa-to-lambda FLC ratio on progression of MGUS was studied. We also examined whether the risk of progression varied depending on the extent to which the FLC ratio was abnormal. To estimate the continuous risk effect of the FLC ratio, a smoothing spline as previously described 17 was used in univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. 18 The risk of progression depending on extent to which the FLC ratio was abnormal was also estimated after adjusting for the size of the serum monoclonal protein to the mean monoclonal protein level. The primary end point was progression to multiple myeloma or a related disorder. Progression endpoints were examined both as cumulative probability of progression and cumulative incidence. The former was computed using an ordinary Kaplan-Meier estimate 19 where patients who die are censored; curves were compared using the log-rank test. The effects of potential risk factors on progression rates were examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. 18 The cumulative incidence curve, on the other hand, explicitly accounts for death from other causes (such as cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, or unrelated malignancy) as a competing risk and was estimated using the method of Gooley. 20 Results Clinical characteristics The median age at diagnosis of MGUS was 72 years. The median serum M protein at diagnosis was 12 g/l. Urine electrophoresis and immunoelectrophoresis or immunofixation was done in 370 patients. Of these, a monoclonal light chain was detected in 110 patients (30%). Additional patient characteristics are given in Table 1. Serum FLC assay The free-kappa light chain values ranged from 0.1 mg/l to 1210 mg/l (median, 20 mg/l), whereas the free-lambda light chain values ranged from 0.1 mg/l to 10 100 mg/l (median, 20 mg/l). There were 737 patients (64%) who had elevated levels of kappa or lambda FLC. The kappa-to-lambda ratio ranged from 0.002 to 94.2 (median, 1.0). Based on the normal reference range for kappalambda ratio currently in use for clinical practice (0.26-1.65), 13 an abnormal FLC ratio (indicating the presence of monoclonal FLCs) was detected in 379 (33%) patients. Of these, the FLC was of the same isotype (kappa or lambda) as the corresponding serum M protein in 371 (98%) of the patients. A higher proportion of patients with a positive urinary monoclonal protein had an abnormal FLC ratio (55%) compared with patients with no detectable monoclonal proteins in the urine (32%) (P.001). Outcomes These 1148 patients were followed for a total of 8982 person years (median, 15 years). There were 783 patients (68%) who were followed until death. During this period of observation, 87 (7.6%) patients experienced progression: multiple myeloma (53 patients), IgM lymphoma (17 patients), primary amyloidosis (6 patients), macroglobulinemia (6 patients), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (3 patients), and plasmacytoma (2 patients). The cumulative probability of progression was 9% at 10 years, 20% at 20 years, and 30% at 25 years, or approximately 1% per year (Figure 1). Because patients who die are censored, the upper curve in this figure reflects the probability that a patient who has not died of other causes will experience plasma cell progression at each point in the follow-up; it therefore represents the natural history of the disease assuming patients do not die of other causes prior to progression. The risk of progression is lower if competing causes of death are taken into account, 11.2% at 25 years, as illustrated by the lower curve in Figure 1A. Risk of progression based on FLC assay In a Cox proportional hazards model, the risk of progression in patients with an abnormal FLC ratio was significantly higher compared with patients with a normal ratio (hazard ratio, 3.5; 95% Table 2. Absolute risk of progression of MGUS to myeloma or related disorders based on the serum FLC ratio Risk based on FLC (kappa-lambda) ratio using the current diagnostic reference range Normal ratio 0.26-1.65* Abnormal ratio < 0.26 or > 1.65 FLC ratio 0.25-4 Risk based on increasingly abnormal FLC (kappa-lambda) ratio FLC ratio 0.125-0.25 or 4-8 FLC ratio < 0.125 or > 8 Absolute risk of progression, % of patients (95% CI) Time of follow-up 5 y 2.5 (1.3-3.8) 8 (4.8-11) 3.1 (1.9-4.4) 9.4 (2.4-15.9) 13.5 (4.3-22.5) 10 y 5.3 (3.2-7.4) 16.7 (11.4-21.7) 6.4 (4.4-8.4) 19.3 (8.5-31.3) 31.7 (13.5-46.1) 15 y 6.6 (4-9.8) 29.9 (21.1-37.8) 9.6 (6.5-12.6) 42.3 (20.1-60.4) 47.3 (18.6-67.1) 20 y 12.6 (4.5-20.7) 35 (23.6-45) 15.8 (8.5-22.7) 42.3 (20.1-67.2) 60.5 (19.3-82.7) Cumulative annual rate of progression, %/y 0.6 1.8 0.8 2 3 Cumulative annual rate of progression, after adjusting for competing risk of death, %/y 0.3 0.8 0.4 1 1.3 *n 769. n 379. n 977. n 95. n 76.

BLOOD, 1 AUGUST 2005 VOLUME 106, NUMBER 3 PROGNOSIS OF MGUS 815 Table 3. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance Hazard ratio (95% Prognostic factor confidence interval)* Abnormal FLC ratio 2.6 (1.7-4.2) Serum M protein size 2.4 (1.7-3.5) IgA, IgM, or biclonal IgA plus IgM 2.6 (1.7-4.0) *P.001 for each variable. confidence interval [CI], 2.3-5.5; P.001). The risk of progression to myeloma or related malignancy at 10 years was 17% with an abnormal ratio compared with 5% with a normal ratio; corresponding rates at 20 years were 35% and 13%, respectively (Figure 1B). There was a good correlation between increasingly abnormal FLC ratio and the relative risk of progression (Figure 2A). The absolute risk of progression at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years for varying FLC ratios is given in Table 2. An increased risk of progression was also noted when the analysis was done using absolute levels of serum FLC. Patients with elevated levels of kappa or lambda FLC had a significantly higher risk of progression compared with those with lower levels (hazard ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.3-3.5; P.002). There were 61 patients (5%) who had suppressed levels of the uninvolved FLC in the absence of elevated involved FLC levels; no increased risk of progression was seen in this group (hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-2.6; P.65). Of 379 patients with an abnormal FLC ratio, the abnormal ratio was due to elevated involved FLC alone in 309 patients; the risk of progression in this group was significantly higher compared with patients with a normal ratio (hazard ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.2-5.5; P.001). An abnormal ratio was solely due to suppressed uninvolved FLC in 32 patients whereas it was due to combined elevated involved FLC and suppressed uninvolved FLC in 20 patients. The hazard ratio for the risk of progression in these 2 groups was 1.4 and 10.5, respectively, but interpretation is restricted by the small sample size. An abnormal FLC ratio occurred with normal levels of both uninvolved and involved FLC in 18 patients. Multivariate analysis and proposed model for predicting risk of progression of MGUS The effect of an abnormal FLC ratio on risk of progression was independent of the size of the M protein, as illustrated in Figure 2B, which has been adjusted for the size of the serum M protein. After adjusting for the size and type of the serum M protein on multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio for progression associated with an abnormal FLC ratio was only slightly reduced (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.7-4.2; P.001) as delineated in Table 3. In this multivariate model the hazard ratio for the size of the serum M protein was 2.4 (P.001) and that for a non IgG type MGUS was 2.6 (P.001). Risk stratification model for MGUS The FLC ratio added additional prognostic value to all 3 subgroups of MGUS stratified by the 2 known prognostic factors, the size and type of M protein (Table 4). We constructed a model for predicting the risk of progression of MGUS based on the size of the serum M protein, the type of immunoglobulin, and the presence of an abnormal FLC ratio ( 0.26 or 1.65). The use of these 3 risk factors identified 4 cohorts of patients with MGUS with significantly different rates of progression (Table 4; Figure 3). In fact, when competing causes of death are taken into account, the true lifetime risk of progression decreases to 2% for patients in the low-risk group. Discussion The term MGUS was first coined at the Mayo Clinic more than 25 years ago, 21 and our studies have shown that the risk of progression of MGUS to myeloma or related malignancy is approximately 1% per year. 5-7 However, distinguishing the patient with a stable monoclonal gammopathy from one in whom multiple myeloma or related disorders will eventually develop is difficult when MGUS is originally recognized. Moreover, there is no decline in the risk of progression over time, 5,6 necessitating lifelong follow-up, usually performed by primary-care providers. Patients are referred to hematologists typically in the face of a rising M Table 4. Risk-stratification models to predict progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to myeloma or related disorders Risk group No. patients Relative risk, 95% CI Absolute risk of progression at 20 years, % Absolute risk of progression at 20 years accounting for death as a competing risk, % Addition of FLC ratio to known prognostic categories Low risk (serum M protein 15 g/l and IgG subtype) Normal FLC ratio 449 1 5 2 Abnormal FLC ratio 142 7.4 27 12 Intermediate risk (either serum M protein 15 g/l or non-igg subtype) Normal FLC ratio 278 1 22 9 Abnormal FLC ratio 184 2.2 37 17 High risk (serum M protein 15 g/l and non-igg subtype) Normal FLC ratio 42 1 37 23 Abnormal FLC ratio 53 1.5 58 27 Risk stratification model incorporating all 3 predictive factors Low risk (serum M protein 15 g/dl, IgG subtype, normal FLC ratio [0.26-1.65]) 449 1 5 2 Low-intermediate risk (any 1 factor abnormal) 420 5.4 21 10 High-intermediate risk (any 2 factors abnormal) 226 10.1 37 18 High risk (all 3 factors abnormal) 53 20.8 58 27

816 RAJKUMAR et al BLOOD, 1 AUGUST 2005 VOLUME 106, NUMBER 3 Figure 3. Risk of progression of MGUS to myeloma or related disorder using a risk-stratification model that incorporates the FLC ratio and the size and type of the serum monoclonal protein. The top curve illustrates risk of progression with time in patients with all 3 risk factors, namely an abnormal serum kappa-lambda FLC ratio ( 0.26 or 1.65), a high serum monoclonal protein level ( 15 g/l), and non IgG MGUS; the second gives the risk of progression in patients with any 2 of these risk factors; the third curve illustrates the risk of progression with one of these risk factors; the bottom curve is the risk of progression for patients with none of the risk factors. References protein on follow-up, or when other symptoms and signs suggestive of myeloma or related malignancy develop. Given the uncertainty that follows the diagnosis of MGUS and the need for long-term follow-up, clinical management would be greatly enhanced by identification of factors that more accurately predict progression or stability. We recently conducted a small case-control study to determine if the presence of an abnormal FLC ratio was associated with progression of MGUS. 22 There were 47 patients with MGUS who had progression to myeloma or related disorder who served as cases, while 50 patients with MGUS without evidence of disease progression served as controls. The presence of an abnormal FLC ratio was associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of progression. Given the significant clinical implications of this finding, the present study was undertaken with the goal of validating and confirming these findings in a large, wellestablished population-based cohort of patients with MGUS in whom long-term follow-up was available. 5 The results of this study confirm our hypothesis that an abnormal FLC ratio is an important risk factor for progression and is independent of the size and type of the serum M protein, 2 known prognostic factors. 5 The relative risk of progression is related to the extent to which the ratio is abnormal. We also show that the size and type of the M protein and the serum FLC ratio can be combined to yield a powerful risk-stratification model for the progression of MGUS. This model identifies a group of patients with low-risk MGUS (constituting almost 40% of the cohort) who have only a 5% risk of progression at 20 years, and a lifetime risk of 2% when competing causes of death are taken into account. Clearly, this group of patients can be reassured to a great extent. In fact, the serum M protein levels may need to be rechecked in this group only if symptoms of myeloma or related disorder become apparent. On the other hand, the smaller group of high-risk patients needs to be monitored more closely before pathologic fractures, hypercalcemia, renal failure, paraplegia from extramedullary plasmacytoma, primary amyloidosis, overwhelming infection, or other serious complications develop. Another goal of the study was to identify patients in whom prophylactic interventions can be justified. Low-risk patients should clearly be excluded from preventive strategies and trials that typically carry adverse effects and cost. However, even in the high-risk group with both a high serum M protein and an abnormal FLC ratio, the risk of progression is only 3% per year, making it hard to justify preventive strategies. It is important in this context to realize that 3% percent of the general population over the age of 50 years has MGUS, whereas the annual incidence of myeloma is only 4 per 100 000, 23 and that the vast majority of patients with MGUS (approximately 75%-90%) 5,6 will not develop myeloma or a related disorder in their lifetime. A risk of progression of 3% per year is, in our opinion, insufficient to warrant large preventive trials in MGUS in the absence of effective drugs with low long-term toxicity. Clearly, additional risk factors are needed, and we are currently exploring factors such as bone marrow microvessel density, marrow angiogenic potential, and presence of circulating plasma cells in predicting progression of MGUS. The high-risk patients with MGUS identified in this study will serve as the base from which additional risk factors can identify a suitable cohort for chemoprevention trials. Recent studies show that loss of heavy chain expression in myeloma is related to cytogenetic events in the heavy chain locus on chromosome 14 (14q32). 24 We hypothesize that clonal evolution of the neoplastic plasma cell may be marked by imbalance in heavy and light chain production, and the results of this study lend support to this theory. Whether the expression of excess clonal FLCs in MGUS evolves from a cell that has undergone additional cytogenetic changes, or represents a clone that has aberrant light chain overexpression from the outset, needs further investigation. The serum FLC assay used in this study is currently used clinically to monitor response to therapy in patients with myeloma who present with unmeasurable levels of monoclonal protein in serum and urine protein electrophoresis studies (oligo-secretory or nonsecretory disease). 12 In these patients, the serum FLC levels are often elevated, decreasing the need for serial bone marrow biopsies. It is also used in a similar manner in patients with primary amyloidosis who often have low or unmeasurable levels of monoclonal protein by electrophoresis. 15 The FLC assay is also being investigated as a replacement to 24-hour urine electrophoresis studies to monitor light chain excretion in the urine. 14,16 Criteria to assess response using the serum FLC assay have been proposed, 25 but need further validation. The presence of an abnormal FLC ratio is a clinically and statistically significant predictor of progression in MGUS. We identify a low-risk subset of patients with MGUS with a remarkably small lifetime risk of progression in whom less frequent follow-up can be justified. Since this subset accounts for almost 40% of all patients, this is a finding of significant importance for the management of MGUS. 1. Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) among Olmsted County, MN residents 50 years of age [abstract]. Blood. 2003;102:934a. Abstract A3476. 2. The International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol. 2003;121:749-757. 3. Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Fonseca R, et al. Thalidomide for previously untreated indolent or smoldering multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2001; 15:1274-1276. 4. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1999;13:1181-1202. 5. Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, et al. A long-term study of prognosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:564-569.

BLOOD, 1 AUGUST 2005 VOLUME 106, NUMBER 3 PROGNOSIS OF MGUS 817 6. Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, Larson DR, Plevak MF, Melton LJ 3rd. Long-term follow-up of 241 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: the original Mayo Clinic series 25 years later [see comment]. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:859-866. 7. Kyle RA. Benign monoclonal gammopathy after 20 to 35 years of follow-up. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68:26-36. 8. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1860-1873. 9. Kyle RA, Gertz MA, Witzig TE, et al. Review of 1,027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2003;78:21-33. 10. Rajkumar SV, Gertz MA, Kyle RA, Greipp PR. Current therapy for multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:813-822. 11. Cesana C, Klersy C, Barbarano L, et al. Prognostic factors for malignant transformation in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1625-1634. 12. Drayson M, Tang LX, Drew R, Mead GP, Carr- Smith H, Bradwell AR. Serum free light-chain measurements for identifying and monitoring patients with nonsecretory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2001;97:2900-2902. 13. Katzmann JA, Clark RJ, Abraham RS, et al. Serum reference intervals and diagnostic ranges for free kappa and free lambda immunoglobulin light chains: relative sensitivity for detection of monoclonal light chains. Clin Chem. 2002;48:1437-1444. 14. Bradwell AR, Carr-Smith HD, Mead GP, Harvey TC, Drayson MT. Serum test for assessment of patients with Bence Jones myeloma. Lancet. 2003;361:489-491. 15. Lachmann HJ, Gallimore R, Gillmore JD, et al. Outcome in systemic AL amyloidosis in relation to changes in concentration of circulating free immunoglobulin light chains following chemotherapy. Br J Haematol. 2003;122:78-84. 16. Abraham RS, Clark RJ, Bryant SC, et al. Correlation of serum immunoglobulin free light chain quantification with urinary Bence Jones protein in light chain myeloma. Clin Chem. 2002;48:655-657. 17. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling Survival Data: Extending the Cox Model. New York, NY: Springer, 2000:102-111. 18. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc (B). 1972;34:187-202. 19. Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-481. 20. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Statistics in Medicine. 1999;18:695-706. 21. Kyle RA. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: natural history in 241 cases. Am J Med. 1978;64:814-826. 22. Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA, Therneau TM, et al. Presence of monoclonal free light chains in the serum predicts risk of progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Br J Haematol. 2004;127:308-310. 23. Kyle RA, Beard CM, O Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Incidence of multiple myeloma in Olmsted County, Minnesota: 1978 through 1990, with a review of the trend since 1945. J Clin Oncol. 1994;12:1577-1583. 24. Szczepanski T, van t Veer MB, Wolvers-Tettero IL, Langerak AW, van Dongen JJ. Molecular features responsible for the absence of immunoglobulin heavy chain protein synthesis in an IgH(-) subgroup of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2000;96:1087-1093. 25. Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA. Conventional therapy and approach to management. Best Pract Res Cl Ha. In press.