Similar documents
Pediatric Patient Information:

Pediatric ARV Working Group Dosing Recommendations

Pediatric Antiretroviral Resistance Challenges

Anumber of clinical trials have demonstrated

MEDICAL COVERAGE GUIDELINES ORIGINAL EFFECTIVE DATE: 03/07/18 SECTION: DRUGS LAST REVIEW DATE: 02/19/19 LAST CRITERIA REVISION DATE: ARCHIVE DATE:

Clinical Commissioning Policy: Use of cobicistat (Tybost ) as a booster in treatment of HIV positive adults and adolescents

Treatment experience in South Africa. Dr Ian Sanne Clinical HIV Research Unit University of the Witwatersrand

CCC ARV Dosing Recommendations for HIV-exposed infants Updated

Principles of Antiretroviral Therapy

Paediatric ART: eligibility criteria and first line regimens. (revised) Dave le Roux 13 August 2016

Supplemental Digital Content 1. Combination antiretroviral therapy regimens utilized in each study

Safety and efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced pediatric patients aged 3 to <6 years: Week 48 analysis of the ARIEL trial

Purpose Methods Demographics of patients in the study Outcome. Efficacy Adverse Event. Limitation

The Genetic Barrier to Resistance

VIKING STUDIES Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects

AWMSG Secretariat Assessment Report Advice no Darunavir (Prezista

PAEDIATRIC HIV INFECTION. Dr Ashendri Pillay Paediatric Infectious Diseases Specialist

Pediatric HIV Update NORTHWEST AIDS EDUCATION AND TRAINING CENTER

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Clinical skills building - HIV drug resistance

EFFECT OF FIRST LINE THERAPY INCLUDING EFAVIRENZ AND TWO NUCLEOSIDE REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITORS IN HIV-INFECTED CHILDREN

Kimberly Adkison, 1 Lesley Kahl, 1 Elizabeth Blair, 1 Kostas Angelis, 2 Herta Crauwels, 3 Maria Nascimento, 1 Michael Aboud 1

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands 6

Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors on the Horizon

SINGLE. Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects

Perspective Resistance and Replication Capacity Assays: Clinical Utility and Interpretation

Too small, too soon: antiretroviral prophylaxis and treatment in preterm and low birth weight infants

ABC/3TC/ZDV ABC PBO/3TC/ZDV

Pediatric Antiretroviral Therapy

WESTERN CAPE ART GUIDELINES PRESENTATION 2013

WARNING LETTER. ( (last accessed July 10, 2009).

Plasma pharmacokinetics of once-daily abacavir- and lamivudinecontaining regimens and week 96 efficacy in HIV-infected Thai children

The availability and cost are obstacles to using pvl in monitoring HIV treatment outcomes in resource-constrained settings

INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON HIV PEDIATRICS - JULY

PAEDIATRIC ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY FOR THE GENERAL PRACTITIONER

1. Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies 2. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 3. University College London

NOTICE TO PHYSICIANS. Division of AIDS (DAIDS), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health

Natural history of HIV Infection

Frailty and age are independently associated with patterns of HIV antiretroviral use in a clinical setting. Giovanni Guaraldi

Higher Risk of Hyperglycemia in HIV-Infected Patients Treated with Didanosine Plus Tenofovir

Recommended dosing for pediatric patients (6 months to 12 years of age) 1. Dose based on lopinavir component* 1.25 ml ml

Cryptococcosis of the Central Nervous System: Classical and Immune-Reconstitution Disease

Reverse transcriptase and protease inhibitor resistant mutations in art treatment naïve and treated hiv-1 infected children in India A Short Review

JOINT WHO/UNAIDS/UNICEF STATEMENT ON USE OF COTRIMOXAZOLE AS PROPHYLAXIS IN HIV EXPOSED AND HIV INFECTED CHILDREN

HIV and FDC aspects of two guidelines. Filip Josephson

Somnuek Sungkanuparph, M.D.

Perinatal HIV Exposure: Antiretroviral Management. Danielle McDonald, PharmD PGY-2 Pediatric Pharmacotherapy Resident

Public Assessment Report. EU worksharing project paediatric data. Valcyte. Valganciclovir

Module 6: ARVs in Children

The use of antiretroviral agents during pregnancy in Canada and compliance with North-American guidelines

Practical Scenarios Calculating doses for newborns. Karen Buckberry

Paediatric HIV Drug Resistance 26th-International-Workshop-on-HIV-Drug-Resistance-programme [2].tiff

Virologic Outcomes of HIV-Infected Children Undergoing a Single-Class Drug Substitution from LPV/r- to EFV-Based cart: A retrospective cohort study.

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

Resistance Post Week 48 in ART-Experienced, Integrase Inhibitor-Naïve Subjects with Dolutegravir (DTG) vs. Raltegravir (RAL) in SAILING (ING111762)

Treatment of HIV-1 in Adults and Adolescents: Part 2

Management of patients with antiretroviral treatment failure: guidelines comparison

Antiviral for systemic use. Darunavir is an inhibitor of Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease.

British HIV Association Guidelines for the Management of Hepatitis Viruses in Adults Infected with HIV 2013 Appendix 2

The advent of protease inhibitors (PIs) as PROCEEDINGS CLINICAL EXPECTATIONS OF EFFICACY: PROTEASE INHIBITOR POTENCY * Benjamin Young, MD, PhD

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

The results of the ARTEN study. Vicente Soriano Hospital Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

Whole genome deep sequencing of HIV reveals extensive multi-class drug resistance in Nigerian patients failing first-line antiretroviral therapy

Baylor-Uganda, Paediatric Infectious Diseases Clinic, Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda 4

HIV Treatment Update. Awewura Kwara, MD, MPH&TM Associate Professor of Medicine and Infectious Diseases Brown University

James Nuttall Paediatric Infectious Diseases Unit Red Cross Children s Hospital

Protease inhibitors (PIs) for human immunodeficiency

Nevirapine concentrations in HIV-infected children treated with divided fixed-dose combination antiretroviral tablets in Malawi and Zambia

PDF of Trial CTRI Website URL -

0.14 ( 0.053%) UNAIDS 10% (94) ( ) (73-94/6 ) 8,920

Redefining The Math. The less the better WEEKS. Daclatasvir 60 mg Tablet K S

Downloaded from:

3rd IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment. Poster Number Abstract #

The NEW ARV Guidelines FAQs

DNA Genotyping in HIV Infection

2 nd Line Treatment and Resistance. Dr Rohit Talwani & Dr Dave Riedel 12 th June 2012

Optimizing 2 nd and 3 rd Line Antiretroviral Therapy in Children and Adolescents

NNRTI Resistance NORTHWEST AIDS EDUCATION AND TRAINING CENTER

Dr Melanie Rosenvinge

Title: What ARV regimen to start in children 3 years old? (TDF)

Clinical Commissioning Policy: Dolutegravir for treatment of HIV-1 infection (all ages) NHS England Reference: B06/P/a

Calculations. Doses and Dosage Regimens. Pharmacy Technician Training Systems Passassured, LLC

Treatment strategies for the developing world

s. Ghosh 1 *, J. neubert 1 *, t. niehues 2, o. adams 3, n. Morali-Karzei 1, a. Borkhardt 1, H. J. laws 1

WHAT S NEW IN THE 2015 PERINATAL HIV GUIDELINES?

5. HIV-positive individuals treated with INH should receive Pyridoxine (B6) 25 mg daily or 50 mg twice/thrice weekly on the same schedule as INH

Terapia antirretroviral inicial y de rescate: Utilidad actual y futura de nuevos medicamentos

Once-a-Day Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy: A Systematic Review

Highly active antiretroviral (ARV) therapy (HAART) has dramatically

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Phase II clinical trial TEmAA. Didier Koumavi EKOUEVI, MD PhD (Principal Investigator)

Kanapathipillai, Rupa; McGuire, Megan; Mogha, Robert; Szumilin, Elisabeth; Heinzelmann, Annette; Pujades- Rodriguez, Mar

Many highly active antiretroviral therapy PROCEEDINGS

Safety of switching raltegravir 400mg twice daily to raltegravir 800mg once daily in virologically suppressed patients

7th International Workshop on Clinical Pharmacology of HIV Therapy Lisbon,, Portugal April 20-22, 22, 2006

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 14 December 2011

Transient viral load increases in HIV-infected children in the UK and Ireland: what do they mean?

ANTIRETROVIRAL (ART) DRUG INFORMATION FOR HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL

Antiretroviral Dosing in Renal Impairment

Transcription:

References: 1. XVI International AIDS Conference, 2006 Abstract no. ThPE0120 2. Bergshoeff A, Burger D, Farrelly L e t al. Pharmacokinetics of once daily vs. twice daily lamivudine and abacavir in HIV-Infected Children: PENTA 13. 11 th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Poster number 934 3. Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Pediatric HIV Infection October 26, 2006 Page 29 Supplement I: Pediatric Antiretroviral Drug Information 4. PENTA guidelines. HIV Medicine 2004: 5: 61-86 5. AIDS 2003; 17: 1639 47 6. AIDS 2008, 22:557 565 7. Lancet 364, 1236 1243 (2004). 8. NACO guidelines for HIV care and treatment in infants and children, November 2006 9. Antiretroviral therapy of HIV infection in infants and children in resource-limited settings: towards universal access: WHO 2006 68

Appendix 1 Estimation of Body Surface Area in Infants and Children* Weight (kg) Surface area (m 2 ) Weight (kg) Surface area (m 2 ) Weight (kg) Surface area (m 2 ) 2 0.16 27 0.97 60 1.7 2.5 0.19 28 1 61 1.7 3 0.21 29 1 62 1.7 3.5 0.24 30 1.1 63 1.7 4 0.26 31 1.1 64 1.7 4.5 0.28 32 1.1 65 1.8 5 0.3 33 1.1 66 1.8 5.5 0.32 34 1.1 67 1.8 6 0.34 35 1.2 68 1.8 6.5 0.36 36 1.2 69 1.8 7 0.38 37 1.2 70 1.9 7.5 0.4 38 1.2 71 1.9 8 0.42 39 1.3 72 1.9 8.5 0.44 40 1.3 73 1.9 9 0.46 41 1.3 74 1.9 9.5 0.47 42 1.3 75 1.9 10 0.49 43 1.3 76 2 11 0.53 44 1.4 77 2 12 0.56 45 1.4 78 2 13 0.59 46 69 1.4 79 2

14 0.62 47 1.4 80 2 15 0.65 48 1.4 81 2 16 0.68 49 1.5 82 2.1 17 0.71 50 1.5 83 2.1 18 0.74 51 1.5 84 2.1 19 0.77 52 1.5 85 2.1 20 0.79 53 1.5 86 2.1 21 0.82 54 1.6 87 2.1 22 0.85 55 1.6 88 2.2 23 0.87 56 1.6 89 2.2 24 0.9 57 1.6 90 2.2 25 0.92 58 1.6 - - 26 0.95 59 1.7 - - 70

Caution (for children less than 10 kg body weight) For children < 10 kg body weight, dosing by body surface area represents a change in usual clinical practice, this will result in an increase in calculated dose. The implications of this change in clinical practice are not known in terms of drug toxicity. Recommendations: Starting doses: For infants < 6 months of age: 50% of calculated dose by body surface area. For infants 6 months 1 year of age: 75% of calculated dose by body surface area For infants over 1 year of age: 100% of calculated dose by body surface area These doses may be adjusted according to clinical circumstances Individual investigators (protocols) should have clear recommendations for dosing in infants *From the United Kingdom Children s Cancer Study Group (UKCCSG) Chemotherapy Standardisation Group. 71

Appendix 2 Weight band Equivalent BSA for each weight band a Recommended dose (mg) range using 300mg/m 2b Recommended dose (mg) range using 400mg/m 2b Actual nevirapine dose (mg) 3-<6 0.21-0.34 63-102 84-136 100 6-<10 0.34-0.49 102-147 136-196 150 10-<15 0.49-0.65 147-195 196-260 200 15-<20 0.65-0.79 195-237 260-284 250 20-<25 0.79-0.92 237-276 284-368 300 25-<30 0.92-1.10 276-330 368-440 400 a From the UKCCSG (Appendix 1) b PENTA Guidelines recommend dosing at 300-400mg/m 2 for children aged 1 month to Tanner stage 3 72

Appendix 3 Dosing recommendations for chronic treatment of children are somewhat controversial. Body surface area has traditionally been used to guide NVP dosing for infants and young children, with dosing recommended at 120 to 200 mg per meter 2 of body surface area every 12 hours, at a maximum of 200 mg per dose. Younger children (e.g., age < 8 years) may require the higher range of dosage (i.e., 200 mg per meter 2 of body surface area twice daily) [17, 19]. The drug label also includes dosing recommendations based on mg/kg dosing, with 7 mg/kg every 12 hours recommended for children aged < 8 years and 4 mg/kg every 12 hours recommended for children aged > 8 years, with a maximum dose of 200 mg. NVP apparent clearance adjusted for body weight is approximately two-fold greater in children under age 8 years; however, these clearance changes are gradual and the mg/kg dosing recommendations result in an abrupt 43% decrease in dose size when the 8 th birthday is reached. Thus, many clinicians prefer the mg per meter 2 of body surface area dosing that was used in clinical trials, particularly for children around the eighth birthday. Ref: Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Pediatric HIV Infection October 26, 2006 Page 29 Supplement I: Pediatric Antiretroviral Drug Information 73

Appendix 4 74

Ref: HIV Medicine 2004: 5: 61 86 Appendix 5 Superior virologic responses with higher nevirapine doses Verweel et al studied the safety and clinical, virological and immunological responses in 74 HIV- 1-infected children 96 weeks after starting a nevirapine-containing regimen. Nevirapine was dosed at the discretion of the paediatrician, according to the manufacturer s guidelines (an initial dose of 120 mg/m 2 /day, increased if no rash occurred after 2 weeks to a maintenance dose of 300 mg/m 2 /day for children < 8 years and 240 mg/m 2 /day for children > 8 years. Children were categorized into high, recommended or low dosage. If the dose was greater than 300 mg/m 2 /day before week 24 they were classified as high. If at all timepoints the dose was less than 240 mg/m 2 /day they were classified as low. The rest were classified as recommended. The median age was 5.2 years and median baseline viral load was 5.1 log copies/ml. In children using nevirapine and NRTI who were maintained on a high (> 300 mg/m 2 per day) dosage of nevirapine, significantly more patients had an undetectable viral load at weeks 24 (P = 0.012) and 96 (P = 0.007) compared with patients on recommended dosages (240 300 mg/m 2 per day; P = 0.012 and P = 0.007, respectively) and compared with patients on lower dosages (< 240 mg/m 2 per day; P = 0.010 and P = 0.007, respectively). At week 48 a trend towards more patients with an undetectable viral load was seen for patients receiving a high dosage of nevirapine compared with patients on recommended (P = 0.066) or lower (P = 0.071) dosages. If the dosage was increased for children on a recommended or lower dosages to more than 300 mg/m 2 per day when the viral load was already undetectable, the viral load continued to be undetectable up to at least week 96. When the viral load was not undetectable or rebounded, three out of four patients reached undetectable levels if the dosage was increased before 24 weeks of treatment. 75

Proportion of patients with undetectable viral load (%) 80 60 40 20 0 73 60 60 43 40 43 37 27 30 30 21 18 12 w eeks 24 w eeks 48 w eeks 96 w eeks Time after Nevirapine initiation in w eeks low dosage recommended dosage high dosage Figure: Proportion of patients achieving undetectable viral load levels (< 400 copes/ml) on high (> 300 mg/m 2 /day), recommended (240 300 mg/m 2 /day) and low (< 240 mg/m 2 /day) dosage of nevirapine, intention-to-treat analysis, missing equals failure, last value carried forward. Ref: AIDS 2003; 17: 1639 47 76