Section B. Variability in the Normal Distribution: Calculating Normal Scores

Similar documents
Section F. Measures of Association: Risk Difference, Relative Risk, and the Odds Ratio

Comparing Means among Two (or More) Independent Populations. John McGready Johns Hopkins University

Confounding and Effect Modification. John McGready Johns Hopkins University

Section D. Another Non-Randomized Study Design: The Case-Control Design

Section C. Sample Size Determination for Comparing Two Proportions

Comparing Proportions between Two Independent Populations. John McGready Johns Hopkins University

Section G. Comparing Means between More than Two Independent Populations

Comparing Proportions between Two Independent Populations. John McGready Johns Hopkins University

Describing Data: Part I. John McGready Johns Hopkins University

Proposal Writing. Lynda Burton, ScD Johns Hopkins University

Statistics for Psychosocial Research Lecturer: William Eaton

Proteins and Amino Acids. Benjamin Caballero, MD, PhD Johns Hopkins University

The Impact of Pandemic Influenza on Public Health

Health Issues for Aging Populations

Experimental design. Basic principles

[Source: Freedman, Pisani, Purves (1998) Statistics, 3rd ed., Ch 2.]

Study Designs. Lecture 3. Kevin Frick

Section H. Case Study: Risk Assessment Issues Associated with Chloroform

Section B. Self-Regulation, Attention, and Problem Solving

Alcohol. Gordon Smith, MD (MB, ChB Otago), MPH Professor University of Maryland National Study Center for Trauma and EMS

Evaluation and Assessment of Health Policy. Gerard F. Anderson, PhD Johns Hopkins University

STD Epidemiology. Jonathan Zenilman, MD Johns Hopkins University

How to Choose the Wrong Model. Scott L. Zeger Department of Biostatistics Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School

Section D. Genes whose Mutation can lead to Initiation

Epidemiology of Diarrheal Diseases. Robert Black, MD, MPH Johns Hopkins University

En & IH Engineering Aspects of Public Health Crises. Quiz 1

Justice in Research Ethics: International Issues. Nancy E. Kass, ScD Johns Hopkins University

Severe Mental Disorders. Etheldreda Nakimuli-Mpungu, MMed (Psych), MBChB Johns Hopkins University

Lecture 3: Digestion and Dieting Physiology

Critical Analysis of Popular Diets and Supplements

Introduction, Nosology, and History. William W. Eaton, PhD Johns Hopkins University

Costing in Vaccine Planning and Programming

Meanings of medications, metonymy. Peter Winch. Health Behavior Change at the Individual, Household and Community Levels

The Nutrition Transition

Epidemiologic Methods for Evaluating Screening Programs. Rosa M. Crum, MD, MHS Johns Hopkins University

Section C. Biomarkers of Early Biological Effect and Altered Structure and Function

Epidemiology of Mood Disorders II: Analytic Epidemiology and the Search for Etiologic Clues. William W. Eaton, PhD Johns Hopkins University

Master Class: Fundamentals of Lung Cancer

Breast Cancer Basics. Clinical Oncology for Public Health Professionals. Ben Ho Park, MD, PhD

Monitoring and Evaluation IN ACTION! Duff Gillespie

Economic Evaluation. Introduction to Economic Evaluation

Measurement of Psychopathology in Populations. William W. Eaton, PhD Johns Hopkins University

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike License

New Drug Targets. Sean T. Prigge, PhD

Changing People s Behavior. Larry Wissow Professor Health, Behavior and Society Johns Hopkins School of Public Health

TB Epidemiology. Richard E. Chaisson, MD Johns Hopkins University Center for Tuberculosis Research

Measurement. Different terminology. Marketing managers work with abstractions. Different terminology. Different terminology.

Salt Iodization in Haiti: Challenges to Improving Salt Production Quality and Recommendations for Pursuing Iodization

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike License

Social Capital. Ginny Tedrow. Health Behavior Change at the Individual, Household and Community Levels

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Outcome

Defining Mental Disorders. Judy Bass, MPH, PhD Johns Hopkins University

Student name: SOCI 420 Advanced Methods of Social Research Fall 2017

Post Procedural Care

2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

STI Prevention: Housekeeping and How We Use Public Health. M. Terry Hogan, MPH Johns Hopkins University

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Chapter 3: Examining Relationships

Chapter 7: Descriptive Statistics

DENOMINATOR: All patients undergoing anterior or apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery

Economic Evaluation. Defining the Scope of a Costeffectiveness

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Patient Reported Outcome High Priority

Students were asked to report how far (in miles) they each live from school. The following distances were recorded. 1 Zane Jackson 0.

Section C. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Influences on Infant and Early Childhood Regulatory Development

9. Interpret a Confidence level: "To say that we are 95% confident is shorthand for..

Quality ID #236 (NQF 0018): Controlling High Blood Pressure National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Statistics for Psychology

Importance of Cell Stock Concentration for Accurate Target Cell Recovery

Normal Distribution: Homework *

Lecture 1 An introduction to statistics in Ichthyology and Fisheries Science

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Patient Reported Outcome High Priority

DENOMINATOR: All patients undergoing anterior or apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery

Psychology Research Process

Lesson 1: Distributions and Their Shapes

Part 1. For each of the following questions fill-in the blanks. Each question is worth 2 points.

8.SP.1 Hand span and height

GUIDANCE FOR SAMPLING ART CLINICS IN COUNTRIES COMBINING SURVEILLANCE OF PRE-TREATMENT HIV DRUG RESISTANCE AND ACQUIRED HIV DRUG RESISTANCE AT 12 AND

Section 3.2 Least-Squares Regression

Probability and Statistics. Chapter 1

Quality ID #113 (NQF 0034): Colorectal Cancer Screening National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Measure #265: Biopsy Follow-Up National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

If you could interview anyone in the world, who. Polling. Do you think that grades in your school are inflated? would it be?

Quality ID #122: Adult Kidney Disease: Blood Pressure Management National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Student name: SOCI 420 Advanced Methods of Social Research Fall 2017

Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence

Part III Taking Chances for Fun and Profit

Applied Statistical Analysis EDUC 6050 Week 4

Lesson Building Two-Way Tables to Calculate Probability

Measure #265: Biopsy Follow-Up National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination

PRINTABLE VERSION. Quiz 1. True or False: The amount of rainfall in your state last month is an example of continuous data.

Measure #402: Tobacco Use and Help with Quitting Among Adolescents National Quality Strategy Domain: Community / Population Health

DESCRIPTION: The percentage of adolescents 13 years of age who had the recommended immunizations by their 13th birthday

Probability Models for Sampling

Using Analytical and Psychometric Tools in Medium- and High-Stakes Environments

SAMPLE ASSESSMENT TASKS MATHEMATICS ESSENTIAL GENERAL YEAR 11

2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

1) What is the independent variable? What is our Dependent Variable?

Quality ID #406: Appropriate Follow-up Imaging for Incidental Thyroid Nodules in Patients National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: CLAIMS ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Transcription:

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this site. Copyright 2009, The Johns Hopkins University and John McGready. All rights reserved. Use of these materials permitted only in accordance with license rights granted. Materials provided AS IS ; no representations or warranties provided. User assumes all responsibility for use, and all liability related thereto, and must independently review all materials for accuracy and efficacy. May contain materials owned by others. User is responsible for obtaining permissions for use from third parties as needed.

Section B Variability in the Normal Distribution: Calculating Normal Scores

The Standard Normal Distribution The standard normal distribution has a mean of 0, and standard deviation of 1 3

The 68-95-99.7 Rule for the Normal Distribution 68% of the observations fall within one standard deviation of the mean 4

The 68-95-99.7 Rule for the Normal Distribution 95% of the observations fall within two standard deviations of the mean (truthfully, within 1.96) 5

The 68-95-99.7 Rule for the Normal Distribution 99.7% of the observations fall within three standard deviations of the mean 6

Fraction of Observations under Standard Normal Within Z SDs of the mean More than Z SDs above the mean More than Z SDs above or below the mean Z 1.0 68.27% 15.87% 31.73% 2.0 95.45% 2.28% 4.55% 2.5 98.76% 0.62% 1.24% 3.0 99.73% 0.13% 0.27% 7

Fraction of Observations under Standard Normal Within Z SDs of the mean More than Z SDs above the mean More than Z SDs above or below the mean Z 1.0 68.27% 15.87% 31.73% 2.0 95.45% 2.28% 4.55% 2.5 98.76% 0.62% 1.24% 3.0 99.73% 0.13% 0.27% 8

Fraction of Observations under Standard Normal Within Z SDs of the mean More than Z SDs above the mean More than Z SDs above or below the mean Z 1.0 68.27% 15.87% 31.73% 2.0 95.45% 2.28% 4.55% 2.5 98.76% 0.62% 1.24% 3.0 99.73% 0.13% 0.27% 9

The 68-95-99.7 Rule for the Normal Distribution What about other normal distributions with other means and standard deviations? Same exact properties apply In fact, any normal distribution with any mean and standard deviation can be transformed to a standard normal curve 10

Transforming to Standard Normal The standard normal curve (blue) and another normal with mean -2, and standard deviation 2 11

Transforming to Standard Normal To center at zero, subtract of mean of -2 from each observation under the red curve 12

Transforming to Standard Normal To change shape (i.e., change spread; i.e., standard deviation) divide each new observation by standard deviation of 2 13

Transforming to Standard Normal To change shape (i.e., change spread; i.e., standard deviation) divide each new observation by standard deviation of 2 14

Transforming to Standard Normal This process is called standardizing or computing z-scores A z-score can be computed for any observation from any normal curve A z-score measures the distance of any observation from its distribution s mean in units of standard deviation This z-score can help asses where the observations fall relative to the rest of the observations in the distribution z-score computed by: 15

Example 1: Blood Pressure in Males Histogram of BP values for random sample of 113 men suggest BP measurements approximated by a normal distribution 16

Example 1: Blood Pressure in Males Data in Stata 17

Example 1: Blood Pressure in Males Summarize command gives sample mean and standard deviation 18

Example 1: Blood Pressure in Males Summarize command gives sample mean and standard deviation (and sample size, minimum and maximum values) 19

Example 1: Blood Pressure in Males Using the sample data, let s estimate the range of blood pressure values for most (95%) of men in the population For normally distributed data, 95% will fall within 2 sds of the mean Again, this is just an estimate using the best guesses from the sample for mean and sd of the population 20

Example 1: Blood Pressure in Males Suppose a man comes into my clinic, gets his blood pressure measured, and wants to know how he compares to all men His blood pressure is 130 mmhg What percentage of men have blood pressures greater than 130 mmhg? Translate to z-score Question akin to what percentage of observations under a standard normal curve are 0.5 sds or more above the mean in value? 21

Example 1: Blood Pressure in Males Could look this up in a normal table (more extensive tables can be found in the back of any stats book or by searching online) Could also use normal function in Stata 22

Example 1: Blood Pressure in Males Typing display normal(z) at command line gives proportion of observation less than z standard deviations from mean: 23

Example 1: Blood Pressure in Males For z = 0.5, roughly 69% percent of observations fall below.5 sds from mean 24

Example 1: Blood Pressure in Males For z = 0.5, roughly 100%-69% = 31% of observations fall above.5 sds from mean 25

Example 1: Blood Pressure in Males So approximately 31% of all men have blood pressures greater than our subject with a blood pressure of 130 What percentage of men have blood pressures more extreme, i.e. farther than.5 sds from the mean of all men in either direction? 26

Example 1: Blood Pressure in Males What we want 27

Example 1: Blood Pressure in Males By symmetry of normal curve, 31% of observations are above.5 sd, and 31% below -.5 sd So a total of 62% is farther than.5 sds from mean in either direction 28