Journal of Asian Scientific Research

Similar documents
Non-Invasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis. Patricia Slev, PhD University of Utah Department of Pathology

Simple Tests to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis in Nonalcoholic Chronic Liver Diseases

Fibrosis & Structural Decline of Liver Allografts: what and how to measure & potential underlying causes. Carla Venturi Monteagudo MD, PhD

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test (ELF) for evaluating liver fibrosis. June 2008

The role of ARFI and APRI in diagnosis of liver fibrosis on patients with common chronic liver diseases

Percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver is an important

New Tools for Assessing Disease Sererity, progression and regression in HBV and HCV

Invasive. Sampling error. Interobserver variability. Nondynamic evaluation of

Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index in children with cholestatic liver diseases to assess liver fibrosis

Evaluation of Fibrosis Progression by Noninvasive Biochemical Markers in Egyptian Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B

Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension Gastroenterology Teaching Project American Gastroenterological Association

Abstract INTRODUCTION RAPID COMMUNICATION

Liver Pathology in the 0bese

Non-Invasive Testing for Liver Fibrosis

Liver 102: Injury and Healing

NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE. Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Primary NAFLD. April 13, 2012

Study of Some Serum Biochemical Markers of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic HCV

Original article On-treatment monitoring of liver fibrosis with transient elastography in chronic hepatitis B patients

Nottingham Patterns of liver fibrosis and their clinical significance

Hepatitis C Management and Treatment

The Values of Hyaluronic Acid and as a Marker of Cirrhosis in Children with Chronic Liver Diseases

Cirrhosis is different from Fibrosis

Clinical Trials & Endpoints in NASH Cirrhosis

Basic patterns of liver damage what information can a liver biopsy provide and what clinical information does the pathologist need?

Basic patterns of liver damage what information can a liver biopsy provide and what clinical information does the pathologist need?

PROPOSTA DI UN NUOVO ALGORIMO PER LA DIAGNOSI ECOGRAFICA DELLE MALATTIE CRONICHE DEL FEGATO

Prise en charge actuelle de l'hépatite C et nouvelles approches thérapeutiques

Pretreatment assessment of Chronic Hepatitis C and Compensated Cirrhosis and Indications for Therapy

Assessment of Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis by Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-Platelet Ratio Index in Children With Biliary Atresia

Invited Re vie W. Analytical histopathological diagnosis of small hepatocellular nodules in chronic liver diseases

Hepatitis C: A Hepatologist s Approach to an Infectious Disease

Why to biopsy? Indications for liver biopsy in common medical liver diseases- how are they changing?

Research Article. Gastroenterology & Hepatology Journal (GHJ) Introduction. Abstract

The role of non-invasivemethods in evaluating liver fibrosis of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Xiao-Ling Chi, Mei-Jie Shi, Huan-Ming Xiao, Yu-Bao Xie, and Gao-Shu Cai. Correspondence should be addressed to Xiao-Ling Chi;

Role of Liver Biopsy. Role of Liver Biopsy 9/3/2009. Liver Biopsies in Viral Hepatitis: Beyond Grading and Staging

Section: Laboratory Last Reviewed Date: June Policy No: 47 Effective Date: August 1, 2013

European. Young Hepatologists Workshop. Organized by : Quantification of fibrosis and cirrhosis outcomes

Pretreatment Evaluation

Update on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Timothy R. Morgan, MD Chief, Hepatology, VA Long Beach Professor of Medicine, UCI

Making the best use of liver biopsy: clinical perspective. Steve Ryder Wolfson Digestive Diseases Centre University of Nottingham

/ FIB4 Index , simple steatosis. FIB4 Index. FIB4 Index. FIB4 Index FIB4 Index. Sterling FIB4 Index. FIB4 Index AST AST ALT

Abstract and Introduction. Patients and Methods. M. Hedenstierna; A. Nangarhari; A. El-Sabini; O. Weiland; S.

Hepatocytes produce. Proteins Clotting factors Hormones. Bile Flow

Case #1. Digital Slides 11/6/ year old woman presented with abnormal liver function tests. Liver Biopsy to r/o autoimmune hepatitis

Laura Smart 9/22/2011

Alternatives to Liver Biopsy for Assessing Liver Disease

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY. DEFINED Involves the study of function that results from disease processes.

Intron A Hepatitis B. Intron A (interferon alfa-2b) Description

Medical technologies guidance Published: 23 September 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg27

INHSU th International Symposium on Hepatitis Care In Substance Users

LIVER PATHOLOGY. Thursday 28 th November 2013

Viral Hepatitis (I) Luigi Terracciano Department of Pathology University Hospital Basel. Basel,

Noninvasive Techniques for the Evaluation and Monitoring of Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

CHRONIC HCV TREATMENT: In Special Populations.

DISCLOSURES. This activity is jointly provided by Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board and Cardea

Assessment of Liver Function: Implications for HCC Treatment

CASE 1 Plasma Cell Infiltrates: Significance in post liver transplantation and in chronic liver disease

Noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis in Latin America and Mexico.

HEP DART 2017, Kona, Hawaii

Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, Vol.46, No.1, April 2016 J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol. (JESP), 46(1), 2016:

International Journal of Integrative Biology A journal for biology beyond borders ISSN

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Monitoring Hepatitis C

IN THE NAME OF GOD. D r. MANIJE DEZFULI AZAD UNIVERCITY OF TEHRAN BOOALI HOSPITAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES SPECIALIST

Multianalyte assays with algorithmic analyses are considered investigational for the diagnosis or monitoring of patients with chronic liver disease.

PITFALLS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF MEDICAL LIVER DISEASE WITH TWO CONCURRENT ETIOLOGIES I HAVE NOTHING TO DISCLOSE CURRENT ISSUES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY 2017

Technology Insight: noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by biochemical scores and elastography

Neutrophils contribute to fracture healing by synthesizing fibronectin+ extracellular matrix rapidly after injury

PREVALENCE OF NAFLD & NASH

NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE (NAFLD) NON-ALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS (NASH) ADDRESSING A GROWING SILENT EPIDEMIC

In response to an enquiry from the Scottish Clinical Biochemistry Managed Diagnostic Network

Evercore ISI Presentation- Madrigal

FATTY LIVER DISEASE (NAFLD) (NASH) A GROWING

Noninvasive Techniques for the Evaluation and Monitoring of Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

Intermediate fibrosis staging in hepatitis C: a problem not overcome by optimal samples or pathologists expertise

NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE (NAFLD) NON-ALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS (NASH) ADDRESSING A GROWING SILENT EPIDEMIC

End Stage Liver Disease & Disease Specific Indications for Liver Transplant. Susan Kang, RN, MSN, ANP-BC

End Stage Liver Disease & Disease Specific Indications for Liver Transplant Susan Kang, RN, MSN, ANP BC

Steatotic liver disease

Noninvasive Diagnosis and Staging of Liver Disease. Naveen Gara, MD

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency: a rare cause of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Hepatology For The Nonhepatologist

Prognosis of untreated Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) Erik Christensen Copenhagen, Denmark

Alam MM 1, Mahtab MA 1, Akbar SMF 2, Kamal M 3, Rahman S 1

Serum alanine aminotransferase has limited predictive value for liver disease in chronic hepatitis C

The diagnostic value of a globulin/platelet model for evaluating liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients

IS LIVER BIOPSY NECESSARY IN PATIENTS WITH NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE?

Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence Risk by Ultrasound Elastography

HOW TO DEAL WITH THOSE ABNORMAL LIVER ENZYMES David C. Twedt DVM, DACVIM Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO

At Least 1 in 5 Patients in Your Practice Have Fatty Liver

Relationship between Serum Iron Indices and Hepatic Iron Quantitation in Patients with Fatty Liver Disease

Management of Incidental Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Viral Hepatitis. Dr Melissa Haines Gastroenterologist Waikato Hospital

Chronic Hepatitis C. Risk Factors

MP Noninvasive Techniques for the Evaluation and Monitoring of Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Autoimmune Liver Diseases

Transcription:

Journal of Asian Scientific Research journal homepage: http://aessweb.com/journal-detail.php?id=5003 COULD SERUM LAMININ REPLACE LIVER BIOPSY AS GOLD STANDARD FOR PREDICTING SIGNIFICANT FIBROSIS IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS B? CLINICAL AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY Abeer M. Hafez Pathology department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University Yasser S. Sheta Internal medicine department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University Mohamed H. Ibrahim Internal medicine department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University Shereen A. Elshazly Internal medicine department Faculty of Medicine, Ain shams University ABSTRACT Background: The prognosis and clinical treatment of chronic liver disease depends greatly on the progression of liver fibrosis, which has resulted from the loss of normal liver cell function due to disorganized over-accumulation of extra-cellular matrix (ECM) components in the liver. Liver biopsy has been considered the gold standard for staging and grading hepatic fibrosis and inflammation. However, the procedure is associated with complications such as bleeding, infection, damage to liver tissue, and it is difficult to put into practice. Aim of the work: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of serum laminin (LN) as serum markers for predicting significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Subjects and methods: The study included 50 subjects, selected to represent 2 groups: group (I) included 30 patients with chronic hepatitis B who were diagnosed by positive serologic tests for serum hepatitis B surface antigen for at least 6 months and group (II) included 20 blood donors subjects who had no symptoms suggestive of liver diseases and negative serologic tests for serum hepatitis B surface antigen served as control. All participants were subjected to thorough history taking, physical examination and routine laboratory investigations include liver function tests. Serum laminin levels were assayed by radio immune assay (RIA). Liver biopsies were done to all chronic hepatitis B patients. Liver fibrosis stages were determined according to the Metavir scoring-system.results: Serum LN concentrations increased significantly with the stage of hepatic fibrosis, which showed positive correlation with the stages of liver fibrosis (r = 0.591, p < 0.001). There were significant differences of serum LN levels between F2-4 groups (patients with significant fibrosis) in 128

comparison with those in F0-F1 groups (mean values ± SD were 156.4 ± 53.8 vs 90.9 ± 20.1,p < 0.001). Serum LN at value 107.5ng/ml was the optimal cut-off value for diagnosis of significant fibrosis (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values were 84.2%, 63.6%, 80%, and 70.0%, respectively). Conclusion: Liver biopsy will remain gold standard for staging and grading hepatic fibrosis and inflammation. But LN could be clinically useful serum markers for predicting significant fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B, especially when liver biopsy is contraindicated. Further studies are needed for determining its value in other chronic liver diseases such as chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), its use as marker of success of management and regression of fibrosis and clinical validity in comparison to other non invasive serum markers. Keywords: Serum laminin, Chronic hepatitis B, Radio immune assay. INTRODUCTION Significant progress has been made in the last two decades in our understanding of the pathogenesis of the wound healing response of the liver to chronic injury. The advent of chronic hepatitis B and C as major causes of end-stage liver disease has played a significant role in the drive to uncover pathogenic mechanisms involved in fibrogenesis. In hepatitis B disease, inflammation appears to be a key driving factor for the fibrogenic response, and the process in turn is likely to be influenced by an array of metabolic and genetic factors. We now appreciate that fibrogenesis is a dynamic process, reflecting a balance between matrix synthesis, deposition, and degradation. Extensive investigation currently indicates that the hepatic stellate cell is a key effector in the fibrogenic response (Feng et al., 2012). Fibrosis is thought to lead to impaired synthetic function, portal hypertension, and, ultimately, reduced survival. Data are now available that indicate that the fibrogenic response is reversible; for example, antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B and C leads to histological improvement of fibrosis (Poynard et al., 2002). Given the apparent importance of fibrosis in predicting prognosis and, moreover, data indicating that it is important to stage fibrosis prior to therapy (and to judge the effect of therapy); histological assessment of the liver has taken on a major role in the management of patients with liver disease (Keyur et al., 2006). Liver biopsy provides useful information to the clinician for determining prognosis and the urgency of therapy, predicting response to treatment, and investigating the etiology of liver injury, as well as for providing a baseline to allow comparisons of future histological outcomes (Bravo et al., 2001). However, percutaneous liver biopsy is an invasive procedure and may be associated with significant complications in 3% of recipients such as bleeding, infection, damage to liver tissue, with a mortality rate of 0.03% (The role of liver biopsy in hepatitis, 1997). Risk factors such as age and cirrhosis increase the likelihood of adverse events from liver biopsy (Poynard et al., 2000). Currently, with the improvements in treatment modalities for chronic liver disease, there is an increasing need for rapid, safe and reliable noninvasive diagnostic methods to stage liver fibrosis, and some of which have been widely validated in 129

patients with chronic hepatitis (Carey and Carey, 2010). Laminin is one of the main glycoproteins of the basement membrane and participates in a series of such biological phenomena as adhesion, migration, cellular differentiation and growth, inflammatory response and the maintenance of the cytoskeleton upon its binding to several components of the matrix, such as collagen type Ⅳ, heparan-sulphate and entacin (Kershenobich and Weissbrod, 2003). In the liver, Laminin is thought to be synthesized by hepatocytes and sinusoidal cells. Among all cellular types in the sinusoids, special attention should be given to stellate cells or lipocytes, which produce the largest amount of serum laminin. (Timpl et al., 1979). Laminin has an important role in the mechanism of fibrogenesis and is, thus, related to hepatic fibrosis (Leroy, 2008). Reports showed that serum fibrosis indices, including HA and LN, could reflect the activity of liver fibrosis to some extent (Friedrich-Rust et al., 2010). In this study, we aimed to evaluate serum LN levels as potential indicators of significant fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B according to the Metavir scoring-system. Subjects and Methods This study was carried out in the gastroenterology unit of Internal Medicine and histopathology departments, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig and Ain Shams University in Egypt. Thirty patients with chronic hepatitis B, who were diagnosed by positive serologic tests for serum hepatitis B surface antigen for at least 6 months, including 19 men and 11 women, mean age ± standard deviation (SD) was (42.3 ± 11.2 in men, 39.8 ± 9.8 in women).these patients were included in this study with an indication for percutaneous liver biopsy, which was performed for assessment of the severity of liver fibrosis. Liver transplantation, gastrointestinal bleeding and other chronic liver diseases were excluded. Sera of 20 blood donors was used as a control group, including 12 men and 8 women, mean age ± (SD) was (33.9 ± 7.2 in men, 29.6 ± 5.4 in women). Healthy subjects had no symptoms suggestive of liver diseases, negative serologic tests for serum hepatitis B surface antigen and had normal serum levels of regular biochemical parameters such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferases (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), etc. All patients provided written informed consent to participate in the study and Ethical Committee in both institutes approved the study. Histopathology Liver biopsies were done to all chronic hepatitis patients and performed with a suction needle (18G, Angiomed Corporation German). Ultrasound was routinely used to determine the percutaneous biopsy site. The size of liver biopsy specimen exceeded 1 cm. The liver tissue sections were fixed in 10% neutralized formadehyde, embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Masson trichrome stain. All biopsy specimens were analyzed by an experienced pathologist blinded to the clinical results of the patients. Liver fibrosis stages were evaluated semi-quantitatively according to the Metavir scoring-system (Bedossa and Poynard, 1996). Fibrosis was staged on a scale of 0 to 4: F0 = no fibrosis, F1 = portal fibrosis without septa, F2 = portal fibrosis and few septa, F3 = numerous septa without cirrhosis, F4 = cirrhosis. 130

Determination of Serum Specimens All serum specimens from the participants were stored at -20oC. Levels of serum LN were analyzed by RIA and determined from a standard curve. Kits of LN were provided all by the Shanghai Navy Medical Institute. The procedures were performed according to the user s manual. Statistical Analysis The results were presented as mean ± standard deviation (S.D.). Statistical comparisons of individual groups were based on unpaired Student s t-test. The gender ratio was compared with χ2 test. Correlation between variables was done using correlation coefficient r. P value is considered significant at 0.05 level, highly significant at 0.01 and non significant at > 0.05. Results According to the Metavir scoring-system, the fibrosis stages on liver biopsy was F0 in 4 patients (13.3%) figure 1, F1 in 7(23.3%) figure 2-3, F2 in 6 (20%) figure 4-5, F3 in 8 (26.7%) figure 6-7, and F4 in 5(16.7%) figure 8-9. So in this study; a total of 19 patients (63.3%) had significant fibrosis ( F2) figure 10. Figure-1. (F0) Mild portal inflammation showed infiltration of portal tract with few lymphocytes without fibrosis (x 10 H & E) Figure-2. (F1) 131

Chronic hepatitis of moderate activity showed expansion of portal tracts with some chronic inflammatory cells mainly lymphocytes, histocytes and fibrous tissue without septa (x 10 H & E). Figure-3. (F1) Trichrome stained liver showing fibrous tissue. The fibrous tissue is stained blue while the cytoplasm of hepatocytes is stained red. The nuclei can be seen as dark red to black structures within cells (x 20). Figure-4. (F2) Chronic hepatitis of moderate activity showed expansion of portal tracts by lymphoid aggregates, histocytes and fibrous tissue with few septa (x 10 H & E). 132

Figure-5. (F2) Trichrome stained liver showed chronic hepatitis of moderate activity with few fibrous tissue septa (stained blue) (x10). Figure-6. (F3) Chronic hepatitis of moderate activity showed expansion of portal tracts by chronic inflammatory cells mainly lymphocytes, histocytes and extensive fibrosis (x 10 H & E) Figure-7. (F3) 133

Trichrome stained liver showed chronic hepatitis of moderate activity with marked deposition of fibrous tissue (stained blue) with numerous fibrous tissue septa (x10) Figure-8. (F4) Advanced cirrhosis showed regenerative nodules separated by fibrous tissue bands containing inflammatory cells mainly lymphocytes with loss of normal liver architecture(x 10 H & E). Figure-9. (F4) Trichrome stain showed cirrhotic liver with loss of normal liver architecture replaced by regenerative nodules surrounded by blue fibrous bands (x 10) 134

Figure-10. Distribution of chronic hepatitis patients according to Metavir scoring-system (grades of liver fibrosis) 13.30% 16.70% 23.30% 26.70% 20% F4 F3 F2 F1 F0 Our results showed that serum LN concentrations increased significantly with the stage of hepatic fibrosis and the highest values of LN were all found in cirrhotic patients (F < 0.01) figure 11. Figure-11. The mean values of serum laminin in different stages of liver fibrosis (ng/ml) F < 0.01 198.8 129.5 150.3 78.2 85.5 94 Controls F0 F1 F2 F3 F4 LN levels showed positive correlation with the stages of liver fibrosis (r = 0.591, p < 0.01) figure 12. 135

Figure-12. Correlation of Seum laminin (ng/ml) with stages of liver fibrosis y = 28.61x + 72.34 R = 0.591 275 250 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 5 r < 0.01 4 3 2 Stages of liver fibrosis 1 0 The serum LN concentrations did not differ significantly between the control group and the F0 group (mean values ± SD were 78.2 ± 9.8 vs 85.5 ± 6.3 (p >0.05). Significant differences of serum LN levels (ng/ml) were found in patients with significant fibrosis (F2-F4 groups) in comparison with those in F0-F1 groups (mean values ± SD were 156.4 ± 53.8 vs 90.9 ± 20.1 (p < 0.001). In the other hand Serum LN at value 107.5ng/ml was the optimal cut-off value for diagnosis of significant fibrosis (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values were shown in table 1. Table-1. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive predictive value and Negative predictive value of serum lamininn as a marker of significant liver fibrosis at cut off value 107.5 ng/ml Sensitivity Specificity Positive predictive value Negative predictive value 84.2% 63.6% 80% 70% DISCUSSION In Egypt, chronic hepatitis B is one of the main causes of chronic liver disease in addition to the main cause; chronic hepatitis C. Therefore, it is clinically important to assess the progression of liver fibrosis for guiding clinical therapy (National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement., 2002). Liver biopsy provides useful information to the clinician for determining prognosis and the urgency of therapy, predicting response to treatment, and investigating the etiology of liver injury, as well as for providing a baseline to allow comparisons of future histological outcomes (Bravo et al., 2001). However, percutaneous liver biopsy is an invasive procedure and may be associated with significant complications in 3% of recipients such 136

as bleeding, infection, damage to liver tissue, with a mortality rate of 0.03% (The role of liver biopsy in hepatitis, 1997). Actually liver biopsy fails to satisfy the more and more pronounced need for a rapid, safe and repeatable tool to monitor the fibrogenic progression of chronic liver disease. The ideal surrogate blood markers should enable repetitive measurement and be provided with other features, such as liver specificity, sensitivity for fibrogenesis/fibrolysis, known half-life, known excretion route, synthesis by an identified cell source, etc (Pinzani et al., 2005). In this study, we aimed to assess the usefulness of serum LN as biomarker for predicting significant fibrosis in CHB patients. We found highly significant differences as regard serum LN in patients with chronic hepatitis B with different grades of liver fibrosis and control subjects. As liver fibrosis progresses, there is a significantly increase of serum LN concentrations correspondingly, and the highest values of LN were all found in cirrhotic group (F = 4). In addition, LN levels showed positive correlation with the stages of liver fibrosis in CHB patients (r = 0.591, p < 0.001). The results suggested that increased serum LN levels, which are components of ECM, might indicate a consequence of chronic liver injury, leading to architectural changes in the liver parenchyma that causes liver fibrosis eventually. Same results were obtained by Feng et al; which suggested a positive role of hyaluronic acid (HA) and LA as serum markers for predicting significant fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (Feng et al., 2012). In the same way Keyur et al, recommended the use of clinical biomarkers of liver fibrosis for its simplicity and accepted correlation with different stages of liver fibrosis (Keyur et al., 2006). In recent years, detention of serum LN was usually as a member of combined analysis of several fibrosis indexes rather than assay of only LN levels in liver fibrosis (Santos et al., 2005; Bolarin and Azinge, 2007). Our results showed significant differences as regard serum LN in patients with significant fibrosis (F2-4) when compared to patients with mild or absent fibrosis (F0-1) and its sensitivity for significant fibrosis (F2-4) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (cut off value: 107.5 ng/ml) was 84.2% which considered more than accepted. However its specificity was to some extent lower; 63.3%.These results might be related to small number of the patients in the study but even though still in accepted figures. Combining of more than one biomarker might increases the sensitivity and specificity of these non invasive markers. This idea supported by Feng et al, which assessed the performance of combined HA and LN for predicting significant fibrosis and recorded better results. No significant differences in serum LN concentrations between patient with chronic hepatitis without fibrosis (F0) and control subjects and also between chronic hepatitis patients in grade F0 and grade F1. These results give impression that serum LN could be useful marker of significant liver fibrosis only but not marker of inflammation or mild fibrosis. Another impression, that we cannot obsolete liver biopsy as gold standard for staging and grading hepatic fibrosis and inflammation. Same concept supported in 2010 by Carey (Carey and Carey, 2010). But despite this superiority of liver biopsy still serum LN and other serum biomarkers should be kept in mind as a valuable, simple, cheap and non invasive tool in assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis patients especially if liver biopsy is contraindicated or at least cannot be repeated. 137

CONCLUSION Liver biopsy well remains gold standard for staging and grading hepatic fibrosis and inflammation. But LN could be clinically useful serum markers for predicting significant fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B, especially when liver biopsy is contraindicated. Further large scale studies are needed for determining its value in other chronic liver diseases such as chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), its use as a marker of management success and regression of fibrosis and clinical validity in comparison to other non invasive serum markers. REFERENCES Bedossa, P. and T. Poynard, 1996. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis c. The metavir cooperative study group. Hepatology, 24(2): 289-293. Bolarin, D. and E. Azinge, 2007. Biochemical markers, extracellular components in liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Nig Q J Hosp Med, 17(1): 42-52. Bravo, A., S. Sheth and S. Chopra, 2001. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med, 344: 495-500. Carey, E. and W. Carey, 2010. Noninvasive tests for liver disease, fibrosis, and cirrhosis: Is liver biopsy obsolete? Cleve Clin J Med, 77(8): 519-527. Feng, L., Z. Chang-Lai, Z. Hong, H. Hua, W. Qun, Xiang Zhua and C. Xiao-Yang, 2012. Role of hyaluronic acid and laminin as serum markers for predicting significant fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B Braz J Infect Dis, 16(1): 9-14. Friedrich-Rust, M., W. Rosenberg, J. Parkes, E. Herrmann, S. Zeuzem and C. Sarrazin, 2010. Comparison of elf, fibrotest and fibroscan for the non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis. BMC Gastroenterol, 10: 103. Kershenobich, S., D. and A. Weissbrod, 2003. Liver fibrosis and inflammation. A review. Ann Hepatol 2: 159-163. Keyur, P., MD., C. Don and M. Rockey, 2006. Clinical utility of biomarkers of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2: 48-57 Leroy, V., 2008. Other non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 32(6 Suppl 1): 52-57. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement., 2002. Management of hepatitis c. Hepatology, 36(5 Suppl 1): S3-20. Pinzani, M., K. Rombouts and S. Colagrande, 2005. Fibrosis in chronic liver diseases: Diagnosis and management. J Hepatol, 42(Suppl 1): S22-36. Poynard, T., J. McHutchison and M. Manns, 2002. Impact of pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin on liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastro enterology, 122: 1303-1313. 138

Poynard, T., V. Ratziu, Y. Benmanov, V. Di Martino, P. Bedossa and P. Opolon, 2000. Fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis c: Detection and significance. Semin Liver Dis, 20: 47-55. Santos, V., M. Leite-Mór and M. Kondo, 2005. Serum laminin, type iv collagen and hyaluronan as fibrosis markers in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Braz J Med Biol Res, 38(5): 747-753. The role of liver biopsy in hepatitis, C., 1997. Hepatology, 26(3 suppl 1): 57S-61S. Timpl, R., H. Rohde, P. Robey, S. Rennard, J. Foidart and G. Martin, 1979. Laminin a glycoprotein from basement membranes. J Biol Chem, 254(19): 9933-9937. 139