Case Discussions: Prostate Cancer

Similar documents
Detection & Risk Stratification for Early Stage Prostate Cancer

BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE POST RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

When PSA fails. Urology Grand Rounds Alexandra Perks. Rising PSA after Radical Prostatectomy

S Crouzet, O Rouvière, JY Chapelon, F Mege, X martin, A Gelet

Prostate Cancer: 2010 Guidelines Update

Prostatectomy as salvage therapy. Cases. Paul Cathcart - Guy s & St Thomas NHS Trust, London

Paul F. Schellhammer, M.D. Eastern Virginia Medical School Urology of Virginia Norfolk, Virginia

Prostate MRI: Who needs it?

Clinical Case Conference

Understanding the risk of recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer. Aditya Bagrodia, MD

Radical Prostatectomy: Management of the Primary From Localized to Oligometasta:c Disease

Prostate MRI for local staging and surgical planning in prostate cancer

Prostate Cancer Innovations in Surgical Strategies Update 2007!

When radical prostatectomy is not enough: The evolving role of postoperative

Low risk. Objectives. Case-based question 1. Evidence-based utilization of imaging in prostate cancer

Prostate Cancer Incidence

Accuracy of post-radiotherapy biopsy before salvage radical prostatectomy

Prostate Cancer- Screening and Selected Treatment Dilemmas COPYRIGHT. Marc B. Garnick MD. Update in Internal Medicine.

ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR PROSTATE CANCER

Timing of Androgen Deprivation: The Modern Debate Must be conducted in the following Contexts: 1. Clinical States Model

da Vinci Prostatectomy

How to deal with patients who fail intracavitary treatment

Prostate Case Scenario 1

Case #1: 75 y/o Male (treated and followed by prostate cancer oncology specialist ).

Newer Aspects of Prostate Cancer Underwriting

Trends in Prostate Cancer Bob Weir AVP Underwriting Research Canada Life Reinsurance

BPH with persistently elevated PSA 아주대학교김선일

PSA is rising: What to do? After curative intended radiotherapy: More local options?

High Intensity Focused Ultrasounds for the treatment of Prostate Cancers Clinical update November D. Maruzzi - L. Ruggera

Debate: Whole pelvic RT for high risk prostate cancer??

Conceptual basis for active surveillance

Focal Therapy is a Fool s Paradise : The whole prostate must be treated!

Prostate Cancer Local or distant recurrence?

Rationale for Multimodality Therapy for High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer

Salvage HDR Brachytherapy. Amit Bahl Consultant Clinical Oncologist The Bristol Cancer Institute, UK

PSA nadir post LDR Brachytherapy and early Salvage Therapy. Dr Duncan McLaren UK & Ireland Users Group Meeting 2016

Open Prostatectomy is Best

Consensus and Controversies in Cancer of Prostate BASIS FOR FURHTER STUDIES. Luis A. Linares MD FACRO Medical Director

Correspondence should be addressed to Taha Numan Yıkılmaz;

Date Modified: May 29, Clinical Quality Measures for PQRS

A schematic of the rectal probe in contact with the prostate is show in this diagram.

Department of Urology, Cochin hospital Paris Descartes University

Prostate Cancer UK s Best Practice Pathway

GUIDELINEs ON PROSTATE CANCER

Men s Health Topics. Jerome Baca, MS, PA-C. Albuquerque Urology Associates January 6 th, 2018

GUIDELINES ON PROSTATE CANCER

Case Scenario 1. 4/19/13 Bone Scan: No scintigraphic findings to suggest skeletal metastases.

When to worry, when to test?

Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy for de Novo Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Prostate Cancer. David Wilkinson MD Gulfshore Urology

Controversies in Prostate Cancer Screening

Neoadjuvant vs. Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Introduction. Original Article

Providing Treatment Information for Prostate Cancer Patients

Prostate Cancer UK Best Practice Pathway: ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE

Date Modified: March 31, Clinical Quality Measures for PQRS

Prostate Cancer Case Study 1. Medical Student Case-Based Learning

ARRO-Case Postoperative Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer

State-of-the-art: vision on the future. Urology

PORT after RP. Adjuvant. Salvage

18-Oct-16. Take home messages. An update for GPs on modern radiation therapy & hormones for prostate cancer. Session plan

Utility of Prostate MRI. John R. Leyendecker, MD

2015 myresearch Science Internship Program: Applied Medicine. Civic Education Office of Government and Community Relations

Q&A. Overview. Collecting Cancer Data: Prostate. Collecting Cancer Data: Prostate 5/5/2011. NAACCR Webinar Series 1

Comparative Analysis Research of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

PROSTATE MRI. Dr. Margaret Gallegos Radiologist Santa Fe Imaging

Updates in Prostate Cancer Treatment 2018

Navigating the Stream: Prostate Cancer and Early Detection. Ifeanyi Ani, M.D. TPMG Urology Newport News

Financial Disclosures. Prostate Cancer Screening and Surgical Management

Managing Prostate Cancer After Initital Treatment Fails: Are There Good Next Steps?

Inception Cohort. Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Oxford VIP-- Inception Cohort (2008) Nov Dec

PROVIDING TREATMENT INFORMATION FOR PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS

Best Papers. F. Fusco

In autopsy, 70% of men >80yr have occult prostate ca

Anatomic Imaging of Prostate Cancer

Evaluation of prognostic factors after radical prostatectomy in pt3b prostate cancer patients in Japanese population

David Gillatt Bristol Urological Institute. David Gillatt Bristol UK

PROSTATE CANCER: A Primer of Diagnosis and Treatment. Jay C. Lee, MD, FRCSC Clinical Associate Professor University of Calgary

Post Radical Prostatectomy Radiation in Intermediate and High Risk Group Prostate Cancer Patients - A Historical Series

Prostate cancer staging and datasets: The Nitty-Gritty. What determines our pathological reports? 06/07/2018. Dan Berney Maastricht 2018

Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline Very Low-/Low-Risk Disease

5. Localised prostate cancer

IN RADIOTERAPIA BEST PAPERS. Direttore Unità Operativa Complessa Radioterapia Oncologica

Erectile Dysfunction (ED) after Radiotherapy (RT) for Prostate Cancer. William M. Mendenhall, MD

Prognostic Value of Surgical Margin Status for Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy

EORTC radiation Oncology Group Intergroup collaboration with RTOG EORTC 1331-ROG; RTOG 0924

The Role of Adjuvant vs Salvage Radiation Therapy after Prostatectomy. Dr. Matt Andrews Supervisor: Dr. David Bowes

Since the beginning of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era in the. Characteristics of Insignificant Clinical T1c Prostate Tumors

Hormone Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Guidelines versus Clinical Practice

Prostate Cancer Grading, Staging and Reporting: An Update Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, MD, PhD

10/30/2018. Martha K. Terris, MD Witherington Distinguished Professor and Chair Medical College of Georgia Urology November 5, 2018

Prostate Biopsy. Prostate Biopsy. We canʼt go backwards: Screening has helped!

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING TESTOSTERONE THERAPY IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER

Patterns of care for prostate cancer An update

Chapter 2. Understanding My Diagnosis

16:30-18:30 WS #67: Urology Forum - Prostate Cancer, Stones, Renal Tumours, Voiding Dysfunction (120 minutes, not repeated) -

D. Jeffrey Demanes M.D. FACRO, FACR, FASTRO Director UCLA Brachytherapy combined HDR + EBRT 574 HDR monotherapy Total Patients

Biochemical recurrence rate in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy with further negative resected tissue

Prostate Cancer Dashboard

Overview of Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Transcription:

Case Discussions: Prostate Cancer Andrew J. Stephenson, MD FRCSC FACS Chief, Urologic Oncology Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute Cleveland Clinic

Elevated PSA 1 54 yo, healthy male, family Hx of prostate cancer (father, age 64) CC: Rising PSA Negative TRUS/Bx x 3 (2006, 2008, 2009), including recent 28- core saturation biopsy under anesthesia (reviewed at CCF) No HG PIN, no ASAP in any biopsy specimen PSA history: DRE: normal TRUS volume: 23 cc (PSA Density 0.3) 03/2006 08/2008 06/2009 09/2009 4.1 (F:T 7%) 5.7 6.9 (F:T 5%) 5.21

Elevated PSA 1 By PCPT risk calculator: Prostate cancer: 42% Biopsy Gleason 7-10: 8% though neg TRUS/Bx x 3! http://deb.uthscsa.edu/uroriskcalc/pages/calcs.jsp or Google PCPT risk calculator

Elevated PSA 1 Treatment options: FU with PSA In 1 year? In 4 years as per ERSPC? Urine PCA3 5-alpha reductase inhibitor as chemoprevention Finasteride? Dutasteride? Does it matter? Endorectal coil prostate MRI Repeat TRUS/Bx How many cores? Location?

Elevated PSA 1 Patient recommended to undergo repeat TRUS/Bx Standard 14-core medially- and laterally-directed biopsy of each sextant (12) and bilateral TZ biopsy Specific focus on apical biopsy

Elevated PSA 1 Sagittal Coronal SV Base Mid Apex R. L. Presti JC Jr. Urol Oncol 2009

Elevated PSA 1 Sagittal Coronal SV Base Mid Apex R. L. Presti JC Jr. Urol Oncol 2009

Elevated PSA 1 Left Right Base 0/1 HG PIN 0/1 0/1 0/1 Mid Apex 1/1+ Glsn 3+4 60% 1/1+ Glsn 3+4 60% 1/2+ (TZ+) Glsn 3+4 40% 0/1 HG PIN 0/2 0/1 0/1 0/1 Lateral Medial Medial Lateral

Elevated PSA 1 Nomogram predictions: 10-year PFP with radical prostatectomy: 93% Risk of extraprostatic extension: Left 16% 5-year PFP with EBRT: 93% 5-year PFP with brachytherapy: 82% Patient elected to undergo bilateral NS-RALRP Pathology: Organ-confined, Gleason 3+4, margins negative, volume > 2 cc, 14 negative lymph nodes 10-year PFP by nomogram: 93%

Elevated PSA 1 Issues: Balancing early detection with over-diagnosis Role of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors Chemoprevention Enhancing early detection Improves AUC of PSA and DRE for prostate cancer diagnosis PSA response to 5-ARI to determine need for biopsy?

Prostate Cancer 1 65 y.o., healthy male CC: Localized prostate cancer PSA history: 03/2001 09/2002 01/2004 07/2006 11/2006 2.5 3.0 4.2 4.3 4.7 PSA velocity: 0.36 ng/ml/yr since 2001 DRE: normal 3/14 cores positive, Gleason 6 TRUS volume 40 cc; PSA density: 0.11

Prostate Cancer 1 Left Right Base Mid 1/1+ Gleason 6 < 5% 0/1 1/1+ Gleason 6 < 5% 0/1 0/1 1/1+ Gleason 6 < 5% 0/1 HG PIN 0/1 Apex 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1 ASAP Lateral Medial Medial Lateral

Prostate Cancer 1 PMH: Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia PSH: appendectomy Parents both lived into late 80 s No family history of prostate Ca Potent, good erections high priority No voiding dysfunction

Prostate Cancer 1 Low-volume, Gleason 6 prostate cancer, T1C, low PSA Nomogram Outcome Predictions: 10-year PFP with radical prostatectomy: 98% 5-year PFP with EBRT (81 Gy): 95% 5-year PFP with brachytherapy: 90% Nomogram Pathology Predictions: ECE: Right 6%, Left 5% SVI and LNI: < 2% Indolent cancer: 46% Epstein criteria for indolent Ca met (T1C, Gleason 6, PSAD < 0.15, 3 or fewer cores involved, none > 50% cancer per core)

Prostate Cancer 1 What would you recommend this patient? Open radical prostatectomy Robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy External-beam radiation therapy Brachytherapy Active surveillance Other (HIFU, cryotherapy, focal therapy) Other?

Prostate Cancer 1 Patient chooses active surveillance due to quality-of-life concerns Recommended repeat biopsy patient chooses to do this in 6 months after wintering in Florida

Prostate Cancer 1 Patient chooses active surveillance due to quality-of-life concerns Recommended repeat biopsy patient chooses to do this in 6 months after wintering in Florida How do you survey patients on active surveillance? Frequency of follow-up PSA testing Need for re-biopsy? How often? Other imaging modalities?

Prostate Cancer 1 Patient chooses active surveillance due to quality-of-life concerns Recommended repeat biopsy patient chooses to do this in 6 months after wintering in Florida How do you survey patients on active surveillance? Frequency of follow-up PSA testing Need for re-biopsy? How often? Other imaging modalities? By what criteria do you recommend treatment? PSA kinetics? Grade progression? Increasing cancer burden? Change in prognosis (e.g. nomogram)?

Prostate Cancer 1 Patient returns in 6 mos for FU PSA history: 03/2001 09/2002 01/2004 07/2006 11/2006 02/2007 05/2007 2.5 3.0 4.2 4.3 4.7 4.8 5.3 PSA velocity: 1.16 ng/ml/year DRE: normal Nomogram unchanged (indolent Ca, PFP w/ Rx) Very happy, not anxious, still sexually active

Prostate Cancer 1 Left Right 1/2+ 1/1+ 1/2+ 0/1 Base Glsn 3+4 Gleason 6 Gleason 6 ASAP 5% 5% < 5% Mid 1/1+ Gleason 6 1/1+ Glsn 3+4 1/2+ Gleason 6 1/1+ Gleason 6 40% 60% 20% 5% Apex 0/1 0/1 0/1 0/1 Lateral Medial Medial Lateral

Prostate Cancer 1 7/17 cores positive, Gleason 3+4, T1c, PSA 5.3 Prognosis: Radical prostatectomy: 10-year PFP 84% EBRT: 5-year PFP 93% Brachytherapy: 5-year PFP 82% Pathological Staging: ECE: Right 6%, Left 9%

Prostate Cancer 1 What would you recommend this patient? Open radical prostatectomy Robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy External-beam radiation therapy Brachytherapy Continued active surveillance Other (HIFU, cryotherapy, focal therapy) Other?

Prostate Cancer 1 Patient elected to undergo bilateral NS-RRP Final pathology: Established extraprostatic extension (bilateral), Gleason 3+4, negative margins, volume 0.5-2 cc, 12 negative LN 10-year PFP by nomogram: 73% 8 wks postop: pad-free, erections adequate for intercourse with PDE5i, PSA NMA

Prostate Cancer 1 pt3a, Gleason 3+4, SM negative, PSA NMA Next step: Observation Adjuvant Radiotherapy Adjuvant ADT Observation and salvage radiotherapy at BCR Observation and ADT at BCR Other

Prostate Cancer 1 pt3a, Gleason 3+4, SM negative, PSA NMA Next step: Observation Adjuvant Radiotherapy Adjuvant ADT Observation and salvage radiotherapy at BCR Observation and ADT at BCR Other What if positive surgical margin?

Prostate Cancer 1 pt3a, Gleason 3+4, SM negative, PSA NMA Next step: Observation Adjuvant Radiotherapy Adjuvant ADT Observation and salvage radiotherapy at BCR Observation and ADT at BCR Other What if seminal vesicle invasion?

Prostate Cancer 1 pt3a, Gleason 3+4, SM negative, PSA NMA Next step: Observation Adjuvant Radiotherapy Adjuvant ADT Observation and salvage radiotherapy at BCR Observation and ADT at BCR Other What if detectable PSA level postop?

Prostate Cancer 1 Patient elected observation 2009: PSA NMA; continent, potent

Prostate Cancer 2 53 y.o. healthy male CC: Prostate cancer PSA history: 11/1999 05/2004 01/2007 03/2007 1.8 2.9 18.1 27.6 PSA velocity: 3.0 ng/ml/year DRE: nodules bilaterally, EPE+ (R. mid-base) Gleason 8, 12/12 cores positive, PNI+

Prostate Cancer 2 Left Right 1/1+ 1/1+ 1/1+ 1/1+ Base Glsn 4+3 Gleason 8 Glsn 3+4 Glsn 4+3 70% 80%, PNI+ 80%, PNI+ 100%, PNI+ Mid 1/1+ Gleason 8 1/1+ Glsn 4+3 1/1+ Glsn 3+4 1/1+ Glsn 3+4 90%, PNI+ 95%, PNI+ 60% 80%, PNI+ Apex 1/1+ Glsn 4+3 1/1+ Glsn 4+3 1/1+ Glsn 3+4 1/1+ Glsn 4+3 100% 95% 50% 90% Lateral Medial Medial Lateral

Prostate Cancer 2 PMH: none PSH: none Family history: no prostate Ca, both parents alive 75 and 83 yrs Erections slightly diminished (not sexually active) No voiding dysfunction

Prostate Cancer 2 Bone scan: No mets CT AP WWO contrast: 2.2 x 0.9 left external iliac node 1.6 x 0.7 right external iliac node Prognosis: RRP: 5-year PFP 28% EBRT (+ ADT): 5-year PFP 46% Pathology: ECE: Left 93%, Right 93% SVI: 72% LNI: 56%

Prostate Cancer 2 T3a, Gleason 8, PSA 27.6 ng/ml, clinically LN+, M0 Treatment options: Lymph node biopsy Open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Neoadjuvant ADT followed by RP EBRT + 6 mos ADT EBRT + 2-3 yrs ADT ADT as primary therapy Enroll in clinical trial neoadjuvant docetaxel + ADT Radical prostatectomy (CALGB - PUNCH) EBRT (RTOG)

Prostate Cancer 2 Patient opted for open radical prostatectomy Bilateral nerve resection Pathology: Bilateral established extraprostatic extension Left SVI Gleason 4+3 Negative margins 3 of 18 positive nodes (bilateral) 10-year PFP by nomogram: 12%

Prostate Cancer 2 6 weeks postop: PSA 0.11 ng/ml No erections, 1 pad daily for incontinence Treatment options: Immediate EBRT Immediate ADT Immediate chemotherapy and ADT Observation with salvage EBRT at PSA relapse Observation with salvage ADT at PSA relapse (use PSA DT) Observation with salvage ADT at clinical progression

Prostate Cancer 2 Elected to follow patient close with plan for deferred ADT based on PSA level and PSA DT PSA history: 05/2007 08/2007 11/2007 PSA doubling time: < 3 months 0.11 2.9 5.9 6 months postop: started on ADT (LHRH agonist + AA) Continuous vs. intermittent? Need for bone densitometry? Calcium + vitd3 supplementation? Assess cardiac risk factors? Fasting glucose? Lipid profile?

Prostate Cancer 2 Started on intermittent ADT continue if nadir PSA < 0.2 20 20 18 ADT Start 16 PSA level, ng/ml 14 12 10 10 8 6 4 ADT Start ADT Stop ADT Stop ADT Stop Ser i es1 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 Months from Radical Prostatectomy

Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality after Radical Prostatectomy Gleason 8-10 Seminal Vesicle Invasion Lymph Node Metastasis PCSM by Specimen Gleason Score PCSM by Pathologic Stage Stephenson et al. ASCO 2009

Prostate Cancer 3 53 y.o. healthy male CC: Localized prostate cancer PSA history: 04/2006 07/2007 10/2008 01/2009 3.8 2.9 10.1 13.2 PSA velocity: 3.32 ng/ml/year DRE: Nodule R. mid, T2a Gleason 8, 4/12 cores positive

Prostate Cancer 3 Left Right 0/1 1/1+ 0/1 0/1 Base ASAP Glsn 3+4 HG PIN HG PIN 25% Mid 0/1 HG PIN 1/1+ Gleason 8 1/1+ Gleason 8 0/1 HG PIN 10% 50% Apex 1/1+ Gleason 6 0/1 HG PIN 0/1 0/1 10% Lateral Medial Medial Lateral

Prostate Cancer 2 PMH: none PSH: none Family history: none Erections Normal (sexually active) No voiding dysfunction

Prostate Cancer 3 Bone scan: No mets CT AP WWO contrast: No mets Prognosis: RRP: 10-year PFP 81% EBRT (+ ADT): 5-year PFP 79% Pathology: Organ-confined: 46% ECE: 45% SVI: 30% LNI: 9%

Prostate Cancer 3 Standard options discussed for high-risk cancer Erections very important but wants to be cured Treatment options: External-beam radiotherapy +/- ADT Radical prostatectomy Nerve-sparing? Unilateral? Bilateral? Partial vs. complete resection? Decision-making?

Cancer Control: Positive Surgical Margins Open RP No. Pts pt2 pt3 Touijer et al. 2006 692 5% 22% Harris 2006 508 2% 48% Smith et al. 2007 509 24% 60% Han et al. 2004 9035 4% 23% RALRP or LRP* Menon et al. 2007 2766 4% 35% Patel et al. 2008 1500 4% 35% Smith et al. 2007 1238 9% 50% Zorn et al. 2009 740 9% 48% Touijer et al. 2006* 485 8% 17%

Positive Surgical Margins Surgeon is independent predictor of SM+ SM+ risk of PSA recurrence by 2-4 fold Eastham et al. J Urol 2003 Swindle et al. J Urol 2005; Stephenson et al. J Urol 2009 SM+ are frequent indicator for secondary therapy Van der Kwast et al. J Clin Oncol 2008 SM+ may risk of PCSM (HR 1.14, P < 0.001) Stephenson et al. ASCO 2009

Side-Specific Risk of Extraprostatic Extension Ohori et al. J Urol 2004; http://www.nomograms.org

Prostate Cancer 3 Bone scan: No mets CT AP WWO contrast: No mets Prognosis: RRP: 10-year PFP 81% EBRT (+ ADT): 5-year PFP 79% Pathology: ECE: Left 30%, Right 23% SVI: 30% LNI: 9%

Prostate Cancer 3 Patient elected to undergo RALRP Bilateral nerve-sparing Pathology: pt2, Gleason 4+3, SM negative, 0/14 LN+ Follow-up: 6 months postop PSA NMA Continent Sexually active with PDE-5 inhibitor