THREATS TO VALIDITY. Presentation by: Raul Sanchez de la Sierra

Similar documents
Threats and Analysis. Shawn Cole. Harvard Business School

What can go wrong.and how to fix it!

Threats and Analysis. Bruno Crépon J-PAL

Glossary From Running Randomized Evaluations: A Practical Guide, by Rachel Glennerster and Kudzai Takavarasha

GUIDE 4: COUNSELING THE UNEMPLOYED

Randomized Experiments with Noncompliance. David Madigan

Evaluating Social Programs Course: Evaluation Glossary (Sources: 3ie and The World Bank)

TRANSLATING RESEARCH INTO ACTION

Welcome to this series focused on sources of bias in epidemiologic studies. In this first module, I will provide a general overview of bias.

Brief introduction to instrumental variables. IV Workshop, Bristol, Miguel A. Hernán Department of Epidemiology Harvard School of Public Health

More on Experiments: Confounding and Obscuring Variables (Part 1) Dr. Stefanie Drew

Statistical Power Sampling Design and sample Size Determination

Critical Appraisal Istanbul 2011

Bias. Zuber D. Mulla

Complier Average Causal Effect (CACE)

Program Evaluations and Randomization. Lecture 5 HSE, Dagmara Celik Katreniak

4/10/2018. Choosing a study design to answer a specific research question. Importance of study design. Types of study design. Types of study design

Collecting Data Example: Does aspirin prevent heart attacks?

CASE STUDY 4: DEWORMING IN KENYA

PHP2500: Introduction to Biostatistics. Lecture III: Introduction to Probability

Supporting children with anxiety

HYPOTHESIS TESTING 1/4/18. Hypothesis. Hypothesis. Potential hypotheses?

Introduction to Program Evaluation

In this chapter we discuss validity issues for quantitative research and for qualitative research.

Research Design. Miles Corak. Department of Economics The Graduate Center, City University of New York

Beyond the intention-to treat effect: Per-protocol effects in randomized trials

Critical Appraisal. Dave Abbott Senior Medicines Information Pharmacist

STEP II Conceptualising a Research Design

Version No. 7 Date: July Please send comments or suggestions on this glossary to

Research Questions, Variables, and Hypotheses: Part 2. Review. Hypotheses RCS /7/04. What are research questions? What are variables?

EXERCISE: HOW TO DO POWER CALCULATIONS IN OPTIMAL DESIGN SOFTWARE

Instrumental Variables I (cont.)

Midterm project due next Wednesday at 2 PM

Genetic Counselor: Hi Lisa. Hi Steve. Thanks for coming in today. The BART results came back and they are positive.

Chapter 9 Experimental Research (Reminder: Don t forget to utilize the concept maps and study questions as you study this and the other chapters.

OBSERVATION METHODS: EXPERIMENTS

Randomization as a Tool for Development Economists. Esther Duflo Sendhil Mullainathan BREAD-BIRS Summer school

How to Randomise? (Randomisation Design)

Author's response to reviews

Confounding and Bias

Lab 2: The Scientific Method. Summary

Chapter 2. The Research Process: Coming to Terms Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind. 1

Internal Validity and Experimental Design

Overview of Clinical Study Design Laura Lee Johnson, Ph.D. Statistician National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine US National

Session IV Practical Issues

PLS 506 Mark T. Imperial, Ph.D. Lecture Notes: Reliability & Validity

Daily Agenda. Honors Statistics. 1. Check homework C4#9. 4. Discuss 4.3 concepts. Finish 4.2 concepts. March 28, 2017

The validity of inferences about the correlation (covariation) between treatment and outcome.

Study design continued: intervention studies. Outline. Repetition principal approaches. Gustaf Edgren, PhD Karolinska Institutet.

The role of Randomized Controlled Trials

Fahrenheit 451 Comprehension Questions

Lecture 18: Controlled experiments. April 14

AVOIDING BIAS AND RANDOM ERROR IN DATA ANALYSIS

VALIDITY OF QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

Fahrenheit 451 Comprehension Questions

Experiments in the Real World

Generalizing the right question, which is?

Denial and Unawareness in Huntington s Disease

STA 291 Lecture 4 Jan 26, 2010

Dichotomizing partial compliance and increased participant burden in factorial designs: the performance of four noncompliance methods

Very Short Notes. Short Notes. 1 placebo definition 2 placebo effect definition

Incorporating Clinical Information into the Label

Regression Discontinuity Design

So You Want to do a Survey?

Session 14: Take Charge of Your Lifestyle

Neural codes PSY 310 Greg Francis. Lecture 12. COC illusion

Evidence Based Practice

Threats to validity in intervention studies. Potential problems Issues to consider in planning

Lecture II: Difference in Difference. Causality is difficult to Show from cross

Non-inferiority trials and switch from non-inferiority to superiority. D Costagliola U 943 INSERM and UPMC Paris 06

Stat 13, Intro. to Statistical Methods for the Life and Health Sciences.

Lecture 3. Previous lecture. Learning outcomes of lecture 3. Today. Trustworthiness in Fixed Design Research. Class question - Causality

50% reduction in strokes

Title:Bounding the Per-Protocol Effect in Randomized Trials: An Application to Colorectal Cancer Screening

Common Statistical Issues in Biomedical Research

Be patient centered, ask the proper questions:

Checklist for appraisal of study relevance (child sex offenses)

Phase III Clinical Trial. Randomization, Blinding and Baseline Assessment. Chi-hong Tseng, PhD Statistics Core, Department of Medicine

Clinical Trials Lecture 4: Data analysis

Experimental Methods. Policy Track

Influencing Mountain Biker behaviour

Workshop on Experiments in Political Economy May Columbia Center for the Study of Development Strategies & the Harriman Institute

GLOSSARY OF GENERAL TERMS

MAT Mathematics in Today's World

AMS 5 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Psychology 2015 Scoring Guidelines

MEDITATION AND MINDFULNESS & GUT HEALTH

Research Process. the Research Loop. Now might be a good time to review the decisions made when conducting any research project.

UNC Family Health Study

Doing Quantitative Research 26E02900, 6 ECTS Lecture 6: Structural Equations Modeling. Olli-Pekka Kauppila Daria Kautto

The Practice of Statistics 1 Week 2: Relationships and Data Collection

ORIENTATION SAN FRANCISCO STOP SMOKING PROGRAM

Critical Appraisal of RCT

Continuous or Intermittent Calorie Deficits: Which is Better for Fat Loss?

Designed Experiments have developed their own terminology. The individuals in an experiment are often called subjects.

The RoB 2.0 tool (individually randomized, cross-over trials)

The comparison or control group may be allocated a placebo intervention, an alternative real intervention or no intervention at all.

CHAPTER 9: Producing Data: Experiments

Functional Analytic Group Therapy: In-Vivo Healing in Community Context (18)

20. Experiments. November 7,

Transcription:

THREATS TO VALIDITY Presentation by: Raul Sanchez de la Sierra

What I want you to avoid

Captain, sorry, I forgot the spillovers!

Lecture Overview External Validity Attrition Spillovers Partial Compliance Fishing for results

Lecture Overview External Validity Attrition Spillovers Partial Compliance Fishing for results

Threat to External Validity: Are these results applicable in a different context?

Generalizability of Results Depend: Sample: is it representative? Sensitivity: would a similar, but slightly different program, have same impact?

Lecture Overview External Validity Attrition Spillovers Partial Compliance Fishing for results

Attrition: the problem Is it a problem if some of the people in the experiment vanish before you collect your data? How about if mostly the treated people disappear? Why is it a problem? Should we expect this to happen?

Attrition: the problem April 06/07 Tests Tests Aug 05 Pay for performance Initial Test Fixed wage Jun 05 11

Attrition: the problem School nutrition program What if only children > 21 Kg come to school? A. Will you underestimate the impact? B. Will you overestimate the impact? C. Neither D. Ambiguous E. Don t know

Before Treatment After Treament T C T C 20 20 22 20 25 25 27 25 30 30 32 30 Ave. 25 25 27 25 Difference 0 Difference 2

Before Treatment After Treament T C T C [absent] [absent] 22 [absent] 25 25 27 25 30 30 32 30 Ave. 27.5 27.5 27 27.5 Difference 0 Difference -0.5

Attrition Bias: are we hopeless? There are solutions!

Attrition Bias: Solutions Implementation: Track participants Analysis: Check attrition by treatment status Check attrition by observables Bound the bias Suppose that dropped participants are extremes

Bound the bias: example April 06/07 Tests Tests Aug 05 Pay for performance Initial Test Fixed wage Jun 05 17

Lecture Overview External Validity Attrition Spillovers Partial Compliance Fishing for results

Spillovers: the problem Not in evaluation Total Population Target Population Evaluation Sample Random Assignment Treatment Group Control Group

Spillovers: the problem Not in evaluation Total Population Target Population Treatment à Evaluation Sample Random Assignment Treatment Group Control Group

Spillovers: the problem Not in evaluation Total Population Target Population Treatment à Evaluation Sample Random Assignment Treatment Group Control Group

Spatial spillovers example

Information spillovers example

Spillovers: the problem Example: Suppose you randomize vaccinations within schools What problems does this create for evaluation? How can we measure total impact?

Vaccines in school A:

No vaccines in school B:

Spillovers: the solution Design What unit of randomization? Design the randomization to estimate spillovers

Spillovers: designed based solution

Lecture Overview External Validity Attrition Spillovers Partial Compliance Fishing for results

Non Compliers: the problem Not in evaluation What can you do? Can you switch them? Target Population No! Evaluation Sample Random Assignment Treatment group Control group Participants No-Shows Non- Participants Cross-overs

Non Compliers : the problem Not in evaluation What can you do? Can you drop them? Target Population No! Evaluation Sample Random Assignment Treatment group Control group Participants No-Shows Non- Participants Cross-overs

Non Compliers : the solution Target Population Not in evaluation You can compare the original groups Evaluation Sample Random Assignment Treatment group Control group Participants No-Shows Non- Participants Cross-overs

Intention to Treat (ITT) Intention to Treat What happened to the average child who is in a treated school in this population? What does this measure mean?

When is ITT Useful? Impact of a vaccination program vs. Impact of a vaccination Which one is relevant to you?

Non Compliers: a general problem Movement across groups Example: School feeding program. Parents could attempt to move their children from comparison school to treatment school

Non Compliers: a better solution Always takers Never takers Compliers Defiers

Never takers TREAT! NOT TREAT!

Always takers TREAT! NOT TREAT!

Compliers TREAT! NOT TREAT!

Defiers TREAT! NOT TREAT!

Non Compliers: a better solution TREAT! NOT TREAT! TAKE PILL NOT TAKE PILL

Non Compliers: a better solution TREAT! NOT TREAT! TAKE PILL Compliers, Always takers NOT TAKE PILL

Non Compliers: a better solution TAKE PILL NOT TAKE PILL TREAT! Compliers, Always takers Never takers, Defiers NOT TREAT!

Non Compliers: a better solution TAKE PILL NOT TAKE PILL TREAT! Compliers, Always takers Never takers, Defiers NOT TREAT! Never takers, Defiers

Non Compliers: a better solution TAKE PILL NOT TAKE PILL TREAT! Compliers, Always takers Never takers, Defiers NOT TREAT! Never takers, Defiers Compliers, Never takers

Non Compliers: a better solution If there are no defiers: We can estimate perfectly the impact of the project among the compliers.

From ITT to LATE Local Average Treatment Effect (LATE) Local: only for those who obey the treatment (compliers) What is the impact of the vaccine amongst people who would take it if told to, and not if not told to? Is this population relevant? 47

Lecture Overview External Validity Attrition Spillovers Partial Compliance Fishing for results

Fishing for results: the problem Let s just measure everything: something may improve Problem: The more outcomes you look at, the higher the chance you find at least one significantly affected by the program

Fishing for results: the solution Solution: Pre-specify outcomes of interest Report results on all measured outcomes, even null results Correct statistical tests (Bonferroni)

Theory of Change GOOD EVALUATIONS! Pay for performance Matatus How to randomize Spillovers Why randomize Power And if you have any doubt: Call us! Sample