PsychTests.com advancing psychology and technology tel 514.745.8272 fax 514.745.6242 CP Normandie PO Box 26067 l Montreal, Quebec l H3M 3E8 contact@psychtests.com Psychometric Report Emotional Intelligence Test 2 nd Revision
Description: A 70-item test assessing the Emotional Intelligence. Low scores indicate low emotional IQ; high scores indicate high emotional IQ. The test yields six sub-scores: 1. Behavioral aspect: measures actions that will encourage desired outcomes in social situations and intrapersonal issues. The higher the score, the higher the practical emotional intelligence. 2. Knowledge aspect: measures the degree of knowledge about how to behave in order to achieve desired outcomes in interpersonal and intra-personal situations. The higher the knowledge aspect score the higher the theoretical emotional intelligence. 3. Emotional insight into self: measures the level of emotional insight. Subject with high emotional insight into self tend to have high emotional intelligence. 4. Goal orientation and motivation: measures the ability to set goals and the drive to achieve them. The higher the score, the higher the emotional intelligence. 5. Ability to express emotions: measures ability to express emotions. The higher the emotional expression, the higher the emotional intelligence. 6. Social insight and empathy: measures the level of social insight and empathy. The higher the score, the higher the emotional intelligence. Reference: Jerabek, I. (2001). Emotional Intelligence Test 2 nd Revision. QueenDom.com Sample Size: 84274 Sample Description: The sample used in this study was randomly selected from a pool of nearly one hundred and fifty thousand participants. It includes men and women, aged 10 to 80, who took the test on Queendom.com website. Number of questions: 70 Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 2
Descriptive Statistics See Annex 1 for Legend of scale abbreviations See Annex 2 for Descriptive statistics Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 3
Distribution for the Emotional Intelligence Test The distribution of the scores is shown in red; the normal curve is represented by the black line plotted over it. The scores are displayed on the x-axis. The y-axis corresponds to the number of respondents who fall into the relevant score range. 12000 OVERALL SCORE 10000 8000 Frequency 6000 4000 2000 0 145.0 135.0 125.0 115.0 105.0 95.0 85.0 75.0 65.0 55.0 45.0 35.0 Std. Dev = 15.00 Mean = 100.0 N = 84274.00 OVERALL SCORE Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 4
12000 BEHAVIOR 10000 8000 Frequency 6000 4000 2000 0 140.0 130.0 120.0 110.0 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 Std. Dev = 15.00 Mean = 100.0 N = 84274.00 BEHAVIOR 12000 KNOWLEDGE 10000 8000 Frequency 6000 4000 2000 0 130.0 125.0 120.0 115.0 110.0 105.0 100.0 95.0 90.0 85.0 80.0 75.0 70.0 65.0 60.0 55.0 50.0 45.0 Std. Dev = 15.00 Mean = 100.0 N = 84274.00 KNOWLEDGE Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 5
6000 EMOTION 5000 4000 Frequency 3000 2000 1000 0 140.0 135.0 130.0 125.0 120.0 115.0 110.0 105.0 100.0 95.0 90.0 85.0 80.0 75.0 70.0 65.0 60.0 Std. Dev = 15.00 Mean = 100.0 N = 84274.00 EMOTION 12000 MOTIVATION 10000 8000 Frequency 6000 4000 2000 0 135.0 130.0 125.0 120.0 115.0 110.0 105.0 100.0 95.0 90.0 85.0 80.0 75.0 70.0 65.0 60.0 55.0 Std. Dev = 15.00 Mean = 100.0 N = 84274.00 MOTIVATION Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 6
12000 EXPRESS 10000 8000 Frequency 6000 4000 2000 0 130.0 125.0 120.0 115.0 110.0 105.0 100.0 95.0 90.0 85.0 80.0 75.0 70.0 65.0 60.0 55.0 50.0 Std. Dev = 15.00 Mean = 100.0 N = 84274.00 EXPRESS 14000 INSIGHT 12000 10000 8000 Frequency 6000 4000 2000 0 130.0 120.0 110.0 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 Std. Dev = 15.00 Mean = 100.0 N = 84274.00 INSIGHT Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 7
Reliability and Internal Consistency Inter-Item Consistency Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha: 0.9068 Split-Half Reliability Correlation between forms: 0.7136 Spearman-Brown formula: 0.8329 Guttman s formula: 0.8235 Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 8
Criterion and Construct Validity 1. Relationship between happiness self-rating and emotional intelligence: Question #1: How would you rate your happiness on a scale from 1 to 10? VALUE="1" > Completely unhappy VALUE="5" > Neither happy nor unhappy VALUE="10" > Completely happy a) General Score: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects with different happiness self-ratings. Groups with higher happiness ratings had higher emotional intelligence. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,49490) = 2806.920 p < 0.0001 OVERALL EIQ SCORE AS A FUNCTION OF HAPPINESS SELF-RATING 120 Mean OVERALL SCORE 110 100 90 80 70 1 - completely unhap 2.00 3.00 5 - neither happy no 4.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - completely happ Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 9
b) Behavioral aspect of emotional intelligence: Significant differences in scores on behavioral aspects of EIQ were found among groups of subjects with various happiness self-rating. Subjects with high happiness self-rating scores have higher scores on the behavioral aspect of EIQ. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,49490) = 3092.242 p < 0.0001 BEHAVIORAL ASPECT SCORE AS A FUNCTION OF HAPPINESS SELF-RATING 120 Mean of BEHAVIOR 110 100 90 80 70 1 - compl. unhappy 2.00 3.00 4.00 5 - neutral 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - compl. happy Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 10
c) Knowledge aspect of emotional intelligence: Significant differences in knowledge scores were found among groups of subjects with various happiness self-ratings. Groups with high happiness ratings have higher scores on the knowledge aspect of EIQ. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,49490) = 449.009 p < 0.0001 KNOWLEDGE ASPECT SCORE AS A FUNCTION OF HAPPINESS SELF-RATING 110 Mean of KNOWLEDGE 100 90 80 1 - compl. unhappy 2.00 3.00 4.00 5 - neutral 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - compl. happpy Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 11
d) Emotional insight into self and emotional intelligence: Significant differences were found among groups of subjects with various levels of happiness self-rating. Subjects with high happiness self-ratings tend to have higher emotional insight scores. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,49490) = 3076.836 p < 0.0001 EMOTIONAL INSIGHT AS A FUNCTION OF HAPPINESS SELF-RATING 120 110 Mean of EMOTION 100 90 80 70 1 - compl. unhappy 2.00 3.00 4.00 5 - neutral 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - compl. happpy Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 12
e) Goal orientation and motivation and emotional intelligence: Significant differences in goal orientation and motivation scores were detected among groups of subjects with various happiness self-rating. Subjects who are highly motivated and goal oriented tend to have high happiness self-rating scores. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,49490) = 1925.320 p > 0.0001 GOAL ORIENTATION AND MOTIVATION AS A FUNCTION OF HAPPINESS SELF-RATING 120 Mean of MOTIVATION 110 100 90 80 1 - compl. unhappy 2.00 3.00 4.00 5 - neutral 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - compl. happy Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 13
f) Ability to express emotions and emotional intelligence: Significant differences in emotional expression scores were found among groups of subjects with various levels of happiness self-rating. Subjects with high emotional expression tend to have high happiness selfrating scores. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,49490) = 1056.007 p < 0.0001 EMOTIONAL EXPRESSION AS A FUNCTION OF HAPPINESS SELF-RATING 120 Mean of EXPRESSION 110 100 90 80 1 - compl. unhappy 2.00 3.00 4.00 5 - neutral 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - compl. happpy Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 14
g) Social insight and empathy: Significant differences in social insight and empathy scores were found among groups of subjects with various levels of happiness. Subjects with high social insight and empathy tend to have high happiness self-rating scores. The effects are robust. See Annex 3 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,49490) = 811.055 p < 0.0001 SOCIAL INSIGHT AND EMPATHY AS A FUNCTION OF HAPPINESS SELF-RATING 110 100 Mean of INSIGHT 90 80 70 1 - compl. unhappy 2.00 3.00 4.00 5 - neutral 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - compl. happy Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 15
3. Relationship between popularity and emotional intelligence. Question #1: How would others around you you re your popularity in your social group on a scale from 1 to 10? VALUE="1" > I am not popular at all VALUE="5" > I m one of the crowd (not bas but I am no star) VALUE="10" > By all measures, I m a star a) General Score: Significant differences in EIQ scores were found among groups of subjects with different popularity ratings. The more popular subjects perceive themselves to be, the higher their overall emotional intelligence. The effects are very robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,48663) = 1288.097 p < 0.0001 OVERALL EIQ SCORE AS A FUNCTION OF POPULARITY SELF-RATING 110 Mean of OVERALL SCORE 100 90 80 70 1 - I am not popular 2.00 3.00 5 - one of the crowd 4.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - I'm a star How would others around you rate your popularity? Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 16
b) Behavioral aspect of emotional intelligence: Significant differences in scores on the behavioral aspect of EIQ were found among groups of subjects with different popularity ratings. The higher the behavioral aspect score, the higher the popularity rating. The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,48663) = 1356.168 p < 0.0001 BEHAVIORAL ASPECT SCORE AS A FUNCTION OF POPULARITY SELF-RATING 120 110 Mean of BEHAVIOR 100 90 80 70 1 - I am not popular 2.00 3.00 5 - one of the crowd 4.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - I'm a star How would others around you rate your popularity? Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 17
c) Knowledge aspect of emotional intelligence: Significant differences in scores on the knowledge aspect of EIQ were found among groups of subjects with different popularity ratings. The higher the knowledge aspect score, the higher the popularity rating. The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,48663) = 291.392 p < 0.0001 KNOWLEDGE ASPECT SCORE AS A FUNCTION OF POPULARITY SELF-RATING 110 Mean of KNOWLEDGE 100 90 80 1 - I am not popular 2.00 3.00 5 - one of the crowd 4.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - I'm a star How would others around you rate your popularity? Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 18
d) Emotional insight into self and emotional intelligence: Significant differences in emotional insight scores were found among groups of subjects with different popularity ratings. The higher the emotional insight score, the higher the popularity rating. The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,48663) = 985.929 p < 0.0001 EMOTIONAL INSIGHT AS A FUNCTION OF POPULARITY SELF-RATING 110 Mean of EMOTION 100 90 80 1 - I am not popular 2.00 3.00 5 - one of the crowd 4.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - I'm a star How would others around you rate your popularity? Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 19
e) Goal orientation/motivation and emotional intelligence: Significant differences in goal orientation and motivation scores were found among groups of subjects with different popularity ratings. The higher the goal orientation and motivation score, the higher the popularity rating. The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,48663) = 537.702 p > 0.001 GOAL ORIENTATION AND MOTIVATION AS A FUNCTION OF POPULARITY SELF-RATING 110 Mean of MOTIVATION 100 90 80 1 - I am not popular 2.00 3.00 5 - one of the crowd 4.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - I'm a star How would others around you rate your popularity? Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 20
f) Ability to express emotions and emotional intelligence: Significant differences in emotional expression scores were found among groups of subjects with various levels of popularity self-rating. The higher the emotional expression, the higher the popularity rating. The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,48663) = 952.422 p > 0.0001 EMOTIONAL EXPRESSION AS A FUNCTION OF POPULARITY SELF-RATING 110 Mean of EXPRESSION 100 90 80 1 - I am not popular 2.00 3.00 5 - one of the crowd 4.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - I'm a star How would others around you rate your popularity? Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 21
g) Social insight and empathy: Significant differences in social insight scores were found among groups of subjects with various levels of popularity self-rating. The higher the social insight, the higher the popularity rating. The effects are robust. See Annex 4 for a table showing homogeneous subsets. F (9,48863) = 648.110 p < 0.0001 SOCIAL INSIGHT AS A FUNCTION OF POPULARITY SELF-RATING 110 Mean of INSIGHT 100 90 80 1 - I am not popular 2.00 3.00 5 - one of the crowd 4.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10 - I'm a star How would others around you rate your popularity? Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 22
Correlations AGE HAPPY POPULAR AGE Pearson 1.000.032 -.002 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)..000.653 N 51199 48476 47716 HAPPY Pearson.032 1.000.380 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed).000..000 N 48476 49500 48018 HAPPYOTH Pearson -.023.636.416 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed).000.000.000 N 47248 47635 47166 POPULAR Pearson -.002.380 1.000 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed).653.000. N 47716 48018 48673 SHORT_ST Pearson.210.594.389 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed).000.000.000 N 51199 49500 48673 SCOR_NEW Pearson.225.563.426 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed).000.000.000 N 51199 49500 48673 BEH_NEW Pearson.190.582.439 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed).000.000.000 N 51199 49500 48673 KNOW_NEW Pearson.266.230.177 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed).000.000.000 N 51199 49500 48673 EMOTION Pearson.167.578.388 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed).000.000.000 N 51199 49500 48673 MOTIVAT Pearson.202.492.297 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed).000.000.000 N 51199 49500 48673 EXPRESS Pearson.131.385.372 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed).000.000.000 N 51199 49500 48673 INSIGHT Pearson.253.332.304 Correlation Sig. (2-tailed).000.000.000 N 51199 49500 48673 ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 23
Correlations (Continued)?? Happiness Self-Rating score is positively and strongly correlated with the overall emotional intelligence score. A moderate positive correlation was found between the behavioral aspect, emotional insight into self, motivation/goal orientation, emotional expression, and social insight scores and happiness self-ratings. A weak positive correlation was found between knowledge aspect scores and happiness self-rating.?? A moderate positive correlation was found between perceived popularity score and the overall emotional intelligence score. Popularity is positively correlated with behavioral aspect, emotional insight into self, emotional expression, and social insight scores. A weak positive correlation was found between both knowledge aspect and motivation/goal orientation scores and perceived popularity score.?? Age is positively but very weakly correlated with overall emotional intelligence. Weak positive correlations were found between age and the behavioral aspect, emotional insight into self, motivation/goal orientation, emotional expression, and social insight scores. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 24
ANNEX 1 - Descriptive Statistics Legend of Scale abbreviations Legend of scale abbreviations: SCORE = Overall Score BEHAVIOR = Behavioral aspect KNOWLEDGE = Knowledge aspect EMOTION = Emotional insight into self MOTIVATION = Goal orientation and motivation EXPRESSION = Ability to express emotions INSIGHT = Social insight and empathy Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 25
ANNEX 2 -Descriptive Statistics SCORE BEHAVIOR KNOWLEDGE EMOTION MOTIVATION EXPRESSION INSIGHT N 84274 84274 84274 84274 84274 84274 84274 Mean 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 100.0000 Std. Error of Mean 5.167E -02 5.167E -02 5.167E -02 5.167E-02 5.167E -02 5.167E -02 5.167E -02 Median 100.9624 100.8979 101.4996 100.5766 100.6895 101.7152 101.4821 Mode 102.42 106.21 114.71 103.04 102.25 104.25 109.67 Std. Deviation 15.0000 15.0000 15.0000 15.0000 15.0000 15.0000 15.0000 Variance 225.0000 225.0000 225.0006 225.0000 224.9989 224.9996 224.9995 Skewness -.266 -.221 -.407 -.095 -.095 -.434 -.509 Std. Error of Skewness.008.008.008.008.008.008.008 Kurtosis -.240 -.317 -.204 -.619 -.592 -.433.025 Std. Error of Kurtosis.017.017.017.017.017.017.017 Range 109.48 103.73 88.08 79.67 77.99 76.14 104.63 Minimum 35.21 40.60 42.78 59.36 55.45 52.22 28.42 Maximum 144.69 144.33 130.86 139.03 133.45 128.37 133.05 Sum 8427399.97 8427399.38 8427402.36 8427398.78 8427397.83 8427401.66 8427400.92 Percentiles 5 73.9156 73.9579 73.6091 74.7387 74.9520 73.1609 72.8411 10 79.7461 79.6391 79.4808 79.3526 79.6316 78.8717 79.8553 15 83.6330 83.6709 83.8845 83.0438 83.5312 83.3135 83.9468 20 87.0341 86.7864 87.5543 86.1197 86.6509 86.4862 87.4539 25 89.7874 89.7187 89.7562 88.8880 88.9906 89.6589 90.3764 30 92.3787 92.1011 92.6920 91.6564 91.3304 92.1971 92.7145 35 94.6461 94.4836 94.8939 94.1171 93.6702 94.7352 95.0525 40 96.7515 96.6828 97.0958 96.2703 96.0099 97.2734 97.3906 45 98.8570 98.8820 99.2977 98.4235 98.3497 99.1770 99.7286 50 100.9624 100.8979 101.4996 100.5766 100.6895 101.7152 101.4821 55 102.9059 102.9138 102.9675 102.7298 102.2493 103.6188 103.2357 60 104.8494 104.7464 105.1693 104.8829 104.5891 105.5224 105.5737 65 106.7929 106.7624 107.3712 107.0361 106.1489 107.4260 107.3272 70 108.7363 108.7783 108.8391 108.8817 108.4887 109.9642 109.0808 75 111.0037 110.9775 111.0410 111.0348 111.6084 111.8678 111.4188 80 113.2711 113.1767 113.9769 113.4956 113.9481 113.7714 113.1724 85 115.7005 115.7424 116.1787 116.2639 116.2879 116.3096 115.5104 90 118.7777 118.8579 118.3806 119.3398 120.1875 118.8477 118.4329 95 123.1505 123.2563 122.0504 123.6462 124.0871 122.0204 121.9400 97 125.7418 126.0052 123.5183 126.4145 126.4269 123.2895 123.6935 99 130.4386 130.9534 129.3900 131.0284 130.3265 125.8277 127.2006 Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 26
ANNEX 3 Homogeneous Subsets The following tables present the homogeneous subsets for all subscores with respect to happiness self-rating. OVERALL SCORE Tukey HSD Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. 1 - completely unhappy N 701 76.9362 2.00 1217 88.2411 3.00 3186 88.6666 4.00 3727 89.1884 5 - neither happy 5227 90.6991 nor unhappy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6.00 5296 96.2295 7.00 10077 102.1320 8.00 12696 108.5083 10 - completely 1727 111.9455 happy 9.00 5646 112.7272 Sig. 1.000.210 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000.486 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2412.718. BEHAVIORAL ASPECT Tukey HSD Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. 1 - completely unhappy N 701 78.0969 2.00 1217 87.9741 3.00 3186 87.9862 4.00 3727 88.3524 5 - neither happy 5227 90.6102 nor unhappy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6.00 5296 95.5730 7.00 10077 101.6443 8.00 12696 108.4345 9.00 5646 113.1987 10 - completely happy 1727 113.7223 Sig. 1.000.988 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000.904 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2412.718. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 27
KNOWLEDGE ASPECT Tukey HSD N Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 - completely unhappy 701 83.1987 2.00 1217 94.8734 5 - neither happy nor unhappy 5227 95.4552 95.4552 3.00 3186 96.7530 96.7530 4.00 3727 97.6513 10 - completely happy 1727 99.1783 6.00 5296 100.6424 7.00 10077 103.0764 8.00 12696 104.7789 9.00 5646 104.8178 Sig. 1.000.927.056.481 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2412.718. EMOTIONAL INSIGHT Tukey HSD Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. 1 - completely unhappy N 701 80.8691 4.00 3727 87.2296 3.00 3186 87.4206 2.00 1217 88.0264 5 - neither happy 5227 90.6796 nor unhappy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6.00 5296 94.3115 7.00 10077 100.4578 8.00 12696 107.3878 9.00 5646 112.9390 10 - completely happy 1727 114.7315 Sig. 1.000.421 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2412.718. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 28
MOTIVATION Tukey HSD Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. 1 - completely unhappy N 701 83.2185 4.00 3727 88.8274 3.00 3186 89.1101 2.00 1217 89.8327 5 - neither happy 5227 91.9314 nor unhappy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6.00 5296 95.1225 7.00 10077 99.9871 8.00 12696 105.9920 9.00 5646 110.6562 10 - completely happy 1727 112.3580 Sig. 1.000.191 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2412.718. EXPRESSION Tukey HSD N Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 - completely unhappy 701 83.8358 2.00 1217 93.0584 3.00 3186 93.5900 5 - neither happy 5227 93.6189 nor unhappy 4.00 3727 94.1192 6.00 5296 98.7682 7.00 10077 102.5289 8.00 12696 106.6565 10 - completely 1727 107.9738 happy 9.00 5646 108.8305 Sig. 1.000.182 1.000 1.000 1.000.481 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2412.718. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 29
INSIGHT Tukey HSD N Rate yourself on a happiness scale from 1 to 10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 - completely unhappy 701 81.0676 2.00 1217 92.8346 5 - neither happy 5227 94.6854 nor unhappy 3.00 3186 94.7898 4.00 3727 96.1265 6.00 5296 99.9426 7.00 10077 103.4273 10 - completely happy 1727 103.5200 8.00 12696 106.4130 9.00 5646 107.4419 Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000.245 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2412.718. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 30
ANNEX 4 Homogeneous Subsets The following tables present the homogeneous subsets for all subscores with respect to popularity self-rating. OVERALL SCORE Tukey HSD How would others around you rate your popularity in your social group? 1 - I am not popular at all N 161180.5497 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2.00 889 85.1451 3.00 1852 89.3535 4.00 2270 92.2750 5 - I'm one of the 9893 96.4526 crowd (not bad but I am no star) 6.00 5884 100.9822 10 - By all measures, I'm a star 7.00 9635 104.1313 1979 106.2689 8.00 10294 106.6783 9.00 4366 108.3342 Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000.989 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2542.982. BEHAVIORAL Tukey HSD How would others around you rate your popularity in your social group? 1 - I am not popular at all N 161181.0344 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2.00 889 84.7961 3.00 1852 88.7051 4.00 2270 91.5974 5 - I'm one of the 9893 96.0745 crowd (not bad but I am no star) 6.00 5884 100.4641 7.00 9635 103.8406 8.00 10294 106.6185 10 - By all 1979 107.3424 Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 31
measures, I'm a star 9.00 4366 108.6734 Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000.692 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2542.982. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 32
KNOWLEDGE Tukey HSD N How would others around you rate your popularity in your social group? 1 2 3 4 5 1 - I am not popular at all 1611 87.8099 2.00 889 93.5705 3.00 1852 96.9868 4.00 2270 98.6429 10 - By all measures, I'm a 1979 99.0036 star 5 - I'm one of the crowd (not bad but I am no star) 9893 99.6450 6.00 5884 102.5923 9.00 4366 103.0329 7.00 9635 103.3410 8.00 10294 103.7585 Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000.298.121 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2542.982. EMOTION Tukey HSD N How would others around you rate your popularity in your social group? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 - I am not popular 161183.8602 at all 2.00 889 87.0297 3.00 1852 89.9829 4.00 2270 91.7367 5 - I'm one of the 9893 95.5862 crowd (not bad but I am no star) 6.00 5884 99.4339 7.00 9635 102.5499 8.00 10294 105.1886 9.00 4366 107.1547 10 - By all measures, I'm a star 1979 107.2097 Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2542.982. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 33
MOTIVATION Tukey HSD How would others around you rate your popularity in your social group? 1 - I am not popular at all N 1611 87.1819 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 2.00 889 89.1170 3.00 1852 92.2177 4.00 2270 93.1586 5 - I'm one of 9893 96.7225 the crowd (not bad but I am no star) 6.00 5884 99.2514 7.00 9635 101.5766 8.00 1029 103.5938 4 10 - By all measures, I'm a star 1979 104.9130 9.00 4366 105.3574 Sig. 1.000 1.000.385 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000.986 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2542.982. EXPRESSION Tukey HSD How would others around you rate your popularity in your social group? 1 - I am not popular at all N 161184.1970 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2.00 889 87.1707 3.00 1852 90.7409 4.00 2270 93.8670 5 - I'm one of the 9893 98.0240 crowd (not bad but I am no star) 6.00 5884 101.4777 10 - By all measures, I'm a star 7.00 9635 104.2928 1979 105.2245105.2245 8.00 10294 106.3076 Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 34
9.00 4366 107.7753 Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000.326.140 1.000 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2542.982. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 35
INSIGHT Tukey HSD N How would others around you rate your popularity in your social group? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 - I am not popular at all 161184.8495 2.00 889 90.1772 3.00 1852 93.9075 4.00 2270 96.6065 5 - I'm one of the crowd (not bad but I am no star) 9893 98.6002 6.00 5884 102.4010 10 - By all measures, I'm a 1979 103.3872103.3872 star 7.00 9635 104.3128 8.00 10294 105.8163 9.00 4366 106.1889 Sig. 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000.283.375.995 Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed. a Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 2542.982. Copyright Plumeus Inc. 2003 36