HSCT for Myeloproliferative Disorders. Jane Apperley

Similar documents
EVI-1 oncogene expression predicts survival in chronic phase CML patients resistant to imatinib

Juan Luis Steegmann Hospital de la Princesa. Madrid. JL Steegmann

IS MUTATION ANALYSIS OF BCR-ABL OF ANY VALUE IN CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF CML PATIENTS? David Marin, Imperial College London

Allogeneic SCT for. 1st TKI. Vienna Austria. Dr. Eduardo Olavarría Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra

Transplants for MPD and MDS

ELN Recommendations on treatment choice and response. Gianantonio Rosti, MD, Department of Hematology, University of Bologna, Italy

A 34-year old women came because of abdominal discomfort. Vital sign was stable. Spleen tip was palpable.

Allogreffe dans les syndromes myélo-prolifératifs. DU ALLOGREFFE DE CSH 17 avril 2015 Marie Robin, MD, PhD Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France

HCT for Myelofibrosis

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis. Outline

History of CML Treatment

STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION IN MYELOFIBROSIS

2 nd Generation TKI Frontline Therapy in CML

Stopping Treatment in CML and dose reduction in clinical practice: Can we do it safely? YES WE CAN!

Role of Second Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Newly Diagnosed CML. GIUSEPPE SAGLIO, MD University of Torino, Italy

IRIS 8-Year Update. Management of TKI Resistance Will KD mutations matter? Sustained CCyR on study. 37% Unacceptable Outcome 17% 53% 15%

Myeloproliferative Disorders - D Savage - 9 Jan 2002

Contemporary and Future Approaches in CML. Emory Meeting; Sea Island August 2014 Hagop Kantarjian, M.D.

Reduced-intensity Conditioning Transplantation

CML: Living with a Chronic Disease

CML David L Porter, MD University of Pennsylvania Medical Center Abramson Cancer Center CML Current treatment options for CML

Post-ASH 2015 CML - MPN

JAK2 Inhibitors for Myeloproliferative Diseases

2nd generation TKIs to first line therapy

Management of CML in blast crisis. Lymphoma Tumor Board November 27, 2015

The speaker has no financial relationships with a commercial interest to disclose and no conflicts of interest to resolve.

Venice Meeting Highlights: Key lessons. Conclusions Michele Baccarani Rüdiger Hehlmann

Guidelines and real World: Management of CML in chronic and advanced phases. Carolina Pavlovsky. FUNDALEU May 2017 Frankfurt

Welcome to Master Class for Oncologists. Session 3: 9:15 AM - 10:00 AM

AIH, Marseille 30/09/06

10 YEARS EXPERIENCE OF TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITOR THERAPY FOR CML IN OXFORD

Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

Should Intermediate-I risk PMF be transplanted immediately or later? Position: Later

London Cancer. Myelofibrosis guidelines. August Review August Version v1.0. Page 1 of 12

Oncology Highlights: Leukemia & Myelodysplastic Syndromes

SESSION III: Chronic myeloid leukemia PONATINIB. Gianantonio Rosti, MD, Department of Hematology, University of Bologna, Italy

When to change therapy? Andreas Hochhaus Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany

Contemporary and Future Approaches in Management of CML. Disclosures

What is the optimal management strategy for younger CP-CML patients with matched, related donors who fail to achieve CCyR

EUROPEAN LEUKEMIANET RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA

What Can We Expect from Imatinib? CML Case Presentation. Presenter Disclosure Information. CML Case Presentation (cont)? Session 2: 8:15 AM - 9:00 AM

CML Update 2016 Arthur 2016

What is New in Leukemia & MPN in 2011?

Blast Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia A Disease of Young at Heart but Not of Body

Patient With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Complete Cytogenetic Response: What Does It Mean, and What Does One Do Next?

MUD SCT. Pimjai Niparuck Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Blood Cancers. Blood Cells. Blood Cancers: Progress and Promise. Bone Marrow and Blood. Lymph Nodes and Spleen

The BCR-ABL1 fusion. Epidemiology. At the center of advances in hematology and molecular medicine

La terapia della LMC: è possibile guarire senza trapianto? Fabrizio Pane

Stopping TKI s in CML- Are we There Yet? Joseph O. Moore, MD Duke Cancer Institute

CML: definition. CML epidemiology. CML diagnosis. CML: peripheralbloodsmear. Cytogenetic abnormality of CML

The current standard of care in CML. Gianantonio Rosti, MD University of Bologna Bologna, Italy

The Evolving Role of Transplantation for MPN

Managing the Patient with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Through and After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

How I treat high risck CML

ASCO 2011: Leukemia. Disclosures

ALLOGENEIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION FOR ACUTE MYELOBLASTIC LEUKEMIAS

MUD HSCT as first line Treatment in Idiopathic SAA. Dr Sujith Samarasinghe Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK

HOW I TREAT CML. 4. KONGRES HEMATOLOGOV IN TRANSFUZIOLOGOV SLOVENIJE Z MEDNARODNO UDELEŽBO Terme Olimia, Podčetrtek,

CML: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Jorge Cortes, MD Chief CML Section Department of Leukemia The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Leukemia and subsequent solid tumors among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

CML and Future Perspective. Hani Al-Hashmi, MD

CLINICAL POLICY DEPARTMENT: Medical Management DOCUMENT NAME: JakafiTM REFERENCE NUMBER: NH.PHAR.98

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

C Longer follow up on IRIS data

MRD in CML (BCR-ABL1)

CML Clinical Case Scenario

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Transplantation for Myeloproliferative neoplasms in the JAK inh era PARAMESWARAN HARI MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) Warunsuda Sripakdee, BCOP,BCP Prince of Songkla University

What is New in CML in Hagop Kantarjian, M.D. February 2011

Stem cell transplantation for patients with AML in Republic of Macedonia: - 15 years of experience -

What s new in Blood and Marrow Transplant? Saar Gill, MD PhD Jan 22, 2016

ADVANCES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES

Philadelphia-positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Update in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Hull and East Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire NHS Trusts Haematology Multidisciplinary Team Guideline and Pathway. Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

Allogeneic Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia in the Era of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Outlook CML 2016: What is being done on the way to cure

Heme 9 Myeloid neoplasms

Form 2012 R3.0: Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML) Pre-Infusion Data

The Practical Application of Statistics: Reading papers and interpreting clinical studies...

The concept of TFR (Treatment Free Remission) in CML

Splenic irradiation before allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

MPL W515L K mutation

Myeloablative and Reduced Intensity Conditioning for HSCT Annalisa Ruggeri, MD, Hôpital Saint Antoine Eurocord- Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris

BMS Satellite Symposium

Chronic Idiopathic Myelofibrosis (CIMF)

THE ITALIAN EXPERIENCE

Opportunities for Optimal Testing in the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. Curtis A. Hanson, MD

Targeted Agents for Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia: Will That Be the End of Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation for That Disease?

ASH 2013 Analyst & Investor Event

State of the Art Therapy and Monitoring of CML Hagop Kantarjian, M.D. Grand Rounds UT Southwestern. October 28, 2010

Medical Benefit Effective Date: 07/01/12 Next Review Date: 03/13 Preauthorization* Yes Review Dates: 04/07, 05/08, 03/10, 03/11, 03/12

Jefferies Healthcare Conference. June 25, 2008

An Introduction to Bone Marrow Transplant

Welcome and Introductions

CML TREATMENT GUIDELINES

Transcription:

HSCT for Myeloproliferative Disorders Jane Apperley

Myeloproliferative disorders CML Polycythemia vera Essential thrombocythemia Primary myelofibrosis bcr-abl + bcr-abl - JAK2 (valine to phenylalanin an position 617) PV 65-95% ET 25-57% IMF ca. 50%

Myelofibrosis Incidence: 0.5-1.5 per 100.000 Primary (idiopathic): 90%; secondary (prior PV or ET): 10% Inappropriate release of fibrogenic cytokines or growth factors, resulting in myelofibrosis Splenomegaly Absence of Ph+ chromosome Leuko-erythroplastic blood picture

Variable clinical course of MF The Lille Scoring System Low: Hb > 10 g/dl and WBC 4-30 x 10 9 /l (median OS 93 months) Intermediate: Hb < 10 g/dl or WBC > 30 x 10 9 /l (median OS 26 months) High: HB < 10 g/dl and WBC < 4 or > 30 x 10 9 /l (median OS 13 months)

1. Hb < 10 g/dl Variable clinical course of MF Cervantes Scoring System 2. Presence of constitutional symptoms (fever, night sweats, weight loss) 3. Circulating blasts 1% Low: up to 1 adverse prognostic factor (median OS 176 months) High: 2 or 3 adverse prognostic factors (median OS 33 months)

Prognosis of MF

Inhibitors of JAK2 LS104 Atiprimod Degrasyn Erlotinib TG101209 AZ-01 In Vitro Murine ITF2357 MK-4567 AZ1480 AT9483 TG101348 XL019 CEP-701 INCB018424 Phase I 0 1 2 Phase II

INCB18424 Results in Rapid and Profound Reduction in Spleen Size 22.5 20.0 17.5 25 mg BID 24 Patients with Palpable Spleen or Liver 10 mg BID 12 Patients with Palpable Spleen or Liver Spleen Size, cm 15.0 12.5 10.0 7.5 N=11 N=19 N=8 5.0 2.5 N=17 N=9 N=2 0.0 0 28 56 84 112 140 168 196 224 252 Days on Therapy NOTE: Data is censored after a dose change or dose interruption

Improvement in constitutional symptoms 25 mg BID 10 mg BID 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 N=14 N=10 N=7 N=11 N=8 N=8 Fatigue Night Sweats Pruritis MFSAF Score (Maximum = 10) 0 Baseline 1 Mo 3 Mo Baseline 1 Mo 3 Mo Baseline 1 Mo 3 Mo Baseline 1 Mo Baseline 1 Mo Baseline 1 Mo Includes only patients with assessment for all time points

Effect of INCB018424 treatment on the percentage of V617F JAK2 Ratio of V617F to WT JAK2 assessed by quantitative genotypic analysis Peripheral Blood V617F Bone Marrow V617F V617F (% of baseline) 100 90 80 N=21 P=0.001 N=19 P=0.013 N=18 P=0.020 N=7 P=0.054 N=3 P=0.094 70 0 28 56 84 112 140 168 196 224 252 Day V617F (% of baseline) 100 90 80 70 N=6 P=0.005 N=2 0 28 56 84 112 140 168 Day Statistically significant but minor reduction of V617F:WT JAK2 ratio was noted in both peripheral blood and bone marrow

INCB018424 treatment (25 mg BID): other aspects of myelofibrosis Bone Marrow No significant changes in fibrosis score or cellularity No significant change in blasts Peripheral Blood No significant change in LDH No significant change in CD34+ cells

Allogeneic SCT for myelofibrosis n=55 (EBMT, GITMO,FHCRC) Overall survival Years after transplantation

Allogeneic SCT for myelofibrosis Myeloablative Pts Med. Age OS TRM Guardiola (1999) 55 42 47% (5y) 27% Deeg (2003) 56 43 58% (3y) 32% ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dose-reduced Rondelli (2005) 21 54 85% (2.5 y) 10% Kröger (2005) 21 53 84% (3y) 16%

High dose conditioning regimens and survival (related & unrelated, HLA identical)

EBMT Allo (RIC) Myelofibrosis Aim of the study To evaluate a dose-reduced conditioning regimen in patients with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM)

Reduced intensity conditioning and allogeneic SCT for myelofibrosis PBSCT Fludarabine 30mg/m 2 Busulfan10mg/kg p.o. or Busilvex 8mg/kg i.v. ATG* ATG ATG Day -6-5 -4-3 -2-1 0 GvHD prophylaxis: CSA day 1 to 180 MTX 10 mg/m² day 1,3+6 *3x 10-20mg/kg

Patient characteristics Number of patients n = 103 Patients sex male 63 female 40 Donors sex male 65 female 39 Age (median) 55 yrs (range, 32 68) Myelofibrosis primary n = 62 post ET/PV n = 41 Time from diagnosis (MF) to transplantation median 18 months (range, 3 276)

Patient characteristics Lille score low 19 intermediate 58 high 17 Cervantes score low 30 high 57 Splenectomy 16

Patient characteristics Donor unrelated n = 69 related n = 34 JAK2 positive n = 51 negative n = 29 HLA-typing matched (8/8 allele) n = 86 mismatched n = 12 DRB1 n = 2 DQB1 n = 5 A n = 4 B n = 1

Results Day 100 1 year 3 years 5 years TRM (%) 5 17 17 Overall survival (%) 71 65 Event free survival (%) 59 51 Relapse risk(%) 10 22 31

Overall survival

Multivariate Analysis Non-relapse mortality: p-value Age > 50 years 7.15 (0.945-54.21) 0.01 Lille high/intermediate HLA-mismatch DFS 4.86 (1.40 16.83) 5.09 (2.05 12.65) 0.001 <0.001 OS Age > 50 years 4.7 (1.11 20.33) 0.03 Relapse Splenectomy prior SCT 3.4 (1.23 9.35) 0.03

Regression of fibrosis Grade 3 Grade 2 Grade 1 Grade 0 Prior SCT (n=24) Day 30 (n=17) Day 100 (n=12) Day 180 (n=20) Day 360 (n= 12) 49% 51% - - 18% 35% 35% 12% 0 25% 41% 34% 5% 10% (relapse) (n=1:relapse 45% 40% 0 0 33% 67%

before allo MF-3

day +30 MF-1

day +100 MF-0

Results In 15 patients, a close monitoring for the JAK2-mutation was performed after allografting. JAK2-negativity was achieved after a median of 89 days post allografting (range, 19-750).

JAK2 monitoring after DLI in a patient with residual disease after allo SCT

The role of SCT in the management of CML

Response in newly diagnosed CML at Imperial College (Hammersmith)

Outcome: 2nd generation TKI (n=113) 3 months 6 months 12 months Complete haematological remission 24% 24% 19% Minor cytogenetic response 14% 14% 12% Partial cytogenetic response 12% 8% 12% Complete cytogenetic response 35% 42% 48% Haematological failure 15% 12% 10%

Outcome of second generation TKI

Outcome of second generation TKI

Hammersmith Hospital: prognostic indicators for response to 2 nd generation TKI 80 CP-CML patients who had failed imatinib therapy at the Hammersmith Hospital between March 2005 and Jan 2008 were treated with a 2G-TKI - dasatinib n=67 nilotinib n=13 Median FU: 28.3 months (6.5-42) Milojkovic et al. ASH 2008

Pre-therapy factors that predict for complete cytogenetic responses Time from IM failure to start of 2G-TKI Sokal risk score Best CyR Additional cytogenetic abnormalities in Ph+ clones Haematological resistance to imatinib Requirement for G-CSF support % Ph+ metaphases at the start of 2G-TKI therapy Milojkovic et al. ASH 2008

Pre- 2G-TKI therapy independent predictive factors for CCyR following multivariate analysis Milojkovic et al. ASH 2008

The Hammersmith scoring system for predicting CCyR to 2G-TKI Milojkovic et al. ASH 2008

Cumulative incidence of best CCyR according to cytogenetic response at 3 months Milojkovic et al. ASH 2008

Three month landmark analysis for OS and EFS according to the CyR response at 3 months Milojkovic et al. ASH 2008

IRIS 6 yr Update: Declining Annual Event Rates Loss of CHR, Loss of MCyR, AP/BC, Death during treatment Hochhaus A. et al, Blood. 2007; 110, 11. 45 25.

Management of imatinib failure IM failure Hammersmith score Donor available Low Intermediate High EBMT score High Low 2G-TKI 2G-TKI SCT Milojkovic et al. ASH 2008

Acknowledgements Joachim Deeg David Marin Letizia Foroni Jamshid S. Khorashad Nicolaus Kroger Hugues de Lavallade Dragana Milojkovic Eduardo Olavarria Alistair Reid Richard Szydlo Alois Gratwohl John Goldman 47