MATERIALS AND METHODS

Similar documents
Definition Prostate cancer

Radical Prostatectomy: Management of the Primary From Localized to Oligometasta:c Disease

BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE POST RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

Timing of Androgen Deprivation: The Modern Debate Must be conducted in the following Contexts: 1. Clinical States Model

EORTC radiation Oncology Group Intergroup collaboration with RTOG EORTC 1331-ROG; RTOG 0924

Metastatic prostate carcinoma. Lee Say Bob July 2017

majority of the patients. And taking an aggregate of all trials, very possibly has a modest effect on improved survival.

Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Recurrent Prostate Cancer

Hormone therapy works best when combined with radiation for locally advanced prostate cancer

CLINICAL TRIALS Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada George Rodrigues, MD, Eric Winquist, MD

High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment Should Start with RT

Prostate Cancer UK Best Practice Pathway: ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer With Intermittent Triple Androgen Blockade: Preliminary Results in 110 Consecutive Patients

Updates in Prostate Cancer Treatment 2018

When to worry, when to test?

Prostate Cancer: 2010 Guidelines Update

Clinical Case Conference

2015 myresearch Science Internship Program: Applied Medicine. Civic Education Office of Government and Community Relations

2016 PQRS OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY

The Return of My Cancer -Emerging Effective Therapies Jianqing Lin, MD

Prostate Cancer. Dr. Andres Wiernik 2017

18-Oct-16. Take home messages. An update for GPs on modern radiation therapy & hormones for prostate cancer. Session plan

Prostate Cancer UK s Best Practice Pathway

Radiation with oral hormonal manipulation for non-metastatic, intermediate or high risk prostate cancer in men 70 and older or with comorbidities

Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada

Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada

Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada Eric Winquist, MD, George Rodrigues, MD

National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) Trial design:

In autopsy, 70% of men >80yr have occult prostate ca

External Beam Radiation Therapy for Low/Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

PCa Commentary. Seattle Prostate Institute CONTENTS. Volume 71 September-October 2011

Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada Eric Winquist, MD, George Rodrigues, MD

2/14/09. Why Discuss this topic? Managing Local Recurrences after Radiation Failure. PROSTATE CANCER Second Treatment

Clinical Management Guideline for Planning and Treatment. The process to be followed when a course of chemotherapy is required to treat:

Prostate Cancer Incidence

Prostate Cancer in comparison to Radiotherapy alone:

Erectile Dysfunction (ED) after Radiotherapy (RT) for Prostate Cancer. William M. Mendenhall, MD

Challenging Cases. With Q&A Panel

Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada George Rodrigues, MD, Mary J. Mackenzie, MD, Eric Winquist, MD

MODULE 8: PROSTATE CANCER: SCREENING & MANAGEMENT

Providing Treatment Information for Prostate Cancer Patients

Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada

PCa Commentary. Prostate Cancer? Where's the Meat? - A Collection of Studies Supporting the Safety of Its Use. Seattle Prostate Institute CONTENTS

Consensus and Controversies in Cancer of Prostate BASIS FOR FURHTER STUDIES. Luis A. Linares MD FACRO Medical Director

Advanced Prostate Cancer. November Jose W. Avitia, M.D

Overview of Radiotherapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Does RT favor RP in long term Quality of Life? Juanita Crook MD FRCPC Professor of Radiation Oncology University of British Columbia

Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer

Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Following Recurring Prostate Cancer Or When Androgen Deprivation Becomes The Necessary Therapy

Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada

Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 30 (2012) 3 15

Community care of Prostate Cancer. Shaun Costello Southern Cancer Network

Edward P. Gelmann, MD

Navigating the Stream: Prostate Cancer and Early Detection. Ifeanyi Ani, M.D. TPMG Urology Newport News

Survival outcomes for men in rural and remote NSW. Trend in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates in Australia. The prostate cancer conundrum

Applications of Quality of Life Outcomes in Three Recent NCIC CTG Trials: What Every New Clinician-Investigator Wants to Know

Economic Model of Multiple Radiation Therapy Treatments for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Overview. June 4, Julia Hayes, M.D. Pamela McMahon, Ph.D.

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING TESTOSTERONE THERAPY IN MEN WITH PROSTATE CANCER

Cancer. Description. Section: Surgery Effective Date: October 15, 2016 Subsection: Original Policy Date: September 9, 2011 Subject:

Case Discussions: Prostate Cancer

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process

PSA is rising: What to do? After curative intended radiotherapy: More local options?

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Clinical Policy: Goserelin Acetate (Zoladex) Reference Number: ERX.SPA.145 Effective Date:

Understanding the risk of recurrence after primary treatment for prostate cancer. Aditya Bagrodia, MD

Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy in Thai Men with Prostate Cancer

Open clinical uro-oncology trials in Canada

Adjuvant and Salvage Radiation for Prostate Cancer. Savita Dandapani, MD, PhD

Conceptual basis for active surveillance

Prostate Cancer: from Beginning to End

Predictive Models. Michael W. Kattan, Ph.D. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences and Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute

The Current State of Hormonal Therapy for Prostate Cancer

THE UROLOGY GROUP

VALUE AND ROLE OF PSA AS A TUMOUR MARKER OF RESPONSE/RELAPSE

When PSA fails. Urology Grand Rounds Alexandra Perks. Rising PSA after Radical Prostatectomy

VALUE OF PSA AS TUMOUR MARKER OF RELAPSE AND RESPONSE. ELENA CASTRO Spanish National Cancer Research Centre

10th anniversary of 1st validated CaPspecific

Initial Hormone Therapy

PSA nadir post LDR Brachytherapy and early Salvage Therapy. Dr Duncan McLaren UK & Ireland Users Group Meeting 2016

Prostatectomy as salvage therapy. Cases. Paul Cathcart - Guy s & St Thomas NHS Trust, London

Effective Health Care Program

Introduction. Methods. Original Article: Clinical Investigation

The Prognostic Importance of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Monitoring Patients Undergoing Maximum Androgen Blockage for Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Maximal androgen blockade versus castration alone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer*

The Spa Hotel, Tunbridge Wells Friday 23 rd March Platinum sponsor

Subject Index. Androgen antiandrogen therapy, see Hormone ablation therapy, prostate cancer synthesis and metabolism 49

Changes in prostate-specific antigen and hormone levels following withdrawal of prolonged androgen ablation for prostate cancer

Review of Polish and international guidelines on hormonal therapy in localized prostate cancer

Prostate Overview Quiz

High Intensity Focused Ultrasounds for the treatment of Prostate Cancers Clinical update November D. Maruzzi - L. Ruggera

X, Y and Z of Prostate Cancer

2011 PROSTATE BRACHYTHERAPY STUDY

Prostate cancer. Treatments Side effects and management in the community setting

Hormone Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Guidelines versus Clinical Practice

PROSTATE CANCER CONTENT CREATED BY. Learn more at

Managing Prostate Cancer After Initital Treatment Fails: Are There Good Next Steps?

2. The effectiveness of combined androgen blockade versus monotherapy.

J Clin Oncol 28: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Best Papers. F. Fusco

Transcription:

Primary Triple Androgen Blockade (TAB) followed by Finasteride Maintenance (FM) for clinically localized prostate cancer (CL-PC): Long term follow-up and quality of life (QOL) SJ Tucker, JN Roundy, RL Leibowitz; Compassionate Oncology Medical Group. 2005 Multidisciplinary Prostate Cancer Symposium, Orlando, FL. Abstract #106. Background: Curative treatment strategies for CL-PC remain controversial and plagued with significant long-term declines in QOL. Recent reports describe frequent and increasing use of primary androgen deprivation (AD) in the setting of CL-PC. We report on our long-term results using a single 13 month cycle of TAB-FM as a management strategy for CL-PC. Methods: We have prospectively treated 183 men with CL-PC who refused local therapy with TAB-FM. TAB consisted of 13 months of therapy with an LH-RH agonist and antiandrogen (bicalutamide or flutamide) plus finasteride 5 MG QD. All men were then given daily FM. QOL has been measured with a validated symptom-based scale for pen-based computers. Physical, psychological, and functional status, as well as global health-related QoL was recorded. Results: Median age was 67, mean baseline PSA (bpsa) was 11.1 ng/ml (range 0.39 59.8) and median Gleason score (GS) of 7 (range 4 10). Mean baseline testosterone (T) was 398 ng/dl. High risk CL-PC (PSA > 20, or GS > 7, or T3 stage) was documented in 59/183 (32%) of men. At a median follow-up of 75 months (range 48-156; first 100 patients) mean PSA is 3.3 ng/ml. Mean current T is 487 ng/dl. A second cycle of AD has been initiated in 14/183 men; all 14 of these men have high risk CL-PC. One man developed metastatic PC and died from progressive resistant PC. No man with low or intermediate risk CL-PC has received a 2nd cycle of AD to date. Five men have proceeded with deferred local therapy 3-6 years after TAB. Disease specific survival is 99.4%. All patients experienced typical and expected toxicity of AD; all toxicities were reversible. Detailed QOL data will be presented in full. Conclusions: A single 13 month cycle of TAB-FM provides excellent long-term control and management of CL-PC, including in men with high risk CL-PC. Evidence that any form of radical local therapy prolongs life is absent from prospective randomized trials. That such therapy has a serious and often permanent impact on potency, continence, or fecal function has been clearly proven. We suggest further exploration of TAB-FM as a safe and viable alternative to surgery, radiotherapy, or brachytherapy for CL-PC.

BACKGROUND The treatment of clinically localized and PSA-detected prostate cancer (CL-PC) is remains controversial. Despite the absence of evidence that PSA screening is effective, some advocates argue for lower screening PSA thresholds while others recommend abandoning PSA screening completely. For men with CL-PC, typical curative treatment recommendations are various forms of surgery or radiation. Unfortunately no evidence exists from randomized clinical trials to support an overall survival benefit for these men compared to observation alone. Further, overwhelming evidence is available that any attempt at curative therapy will result in a high likelihood of long term complications such as impotence, urinary incontinence, and fecal bother. Even if a survival benefit does exist for early use of radical therapy as curative therapy, numerous validated nomograms are available to efficiently identify those men for whom PSA recurrence is more probable than possible, thus identifying men for who cure is not even likely. The majority of these men present with micrometastatic disease, undetectable by conventional imaging, and will ultimately require systemic therapy. Early androgen deprivation (AD) is highly effective in advanced PC and provides a survival advantage for men with high risk PC or node positive PC treated with combined modality therapy. According to the CAPsure database, primary AD, while not often regarded as an option for CL-PC, has been significantly increasing in usage over the last decade, across all risk categories. For men with PSA recurrence and a rapid PSA doubling time, early AD is given as salvage therapy and may provide a survival advantage. Some authors have also identified that delayed AD is associated with an increased risk of a PC specific death. Last, intracellular AD, via 5-alpha reductase inhibition, has been shown to reduce the risk of healthy men developing PC by 24%, possibly by overall reduction in intracellular DHT levels. For over 10 years we have eschewed radical therapies in favor of a single cycle of primary AD using Triple Androgen Blockade (TAB) followed by finasteride maintenance (FM). We use TAB-FM as a management strategy for CL-PC; given the high prevalence of CL-PC, we treat it as a chronic systemic disease, not an acute life-threatening illness. We present long-term follow-up, including quality of life (QOL), in a large cohort of men with CL-PC treated with TAB-FM as primary therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients: We have been prospectively using a single cycle TAB-FM for greater than 10 years in men refusing radical local therapy. Demographics and outcomes have been tracked prospectively in an Excel database involving 217 men. All men had biopsy proven PC. Over 90% of patients had their pathology re-confirmed at an academic center. Initially, routine imaging was not performed to confirm CL-PC, but has been standard since 1999. Patients with clinical evidence of metastatic disease or histology other than adenocarcinoma are excluded from study. No patient had undergone any form of local therapy prior to TAB-FM. All patients were informed of the risks, benefits, and alternatives to hormone blockade before therapy was initiated. Treatment: TAB consists of an LHRH agonist (either leuprolide acetate [7.5 mg] or goserelin acetate [3.6 mg] every 28 days) plus an antiandrogen (either flutamide [750 mg] or bicalutamide [initially 50mg and later increased to 150 mg] daily) plus finasteride (5 mg daily) for a median of 13 months. Induction therapy was followed by maintenance therapy with finasteride (5 mg daily) for an indefinite period. Outcome measurements: Long-term PSA and testosterone (T) levels Disease-specific survival Time to achieve unmeasurable PSA (defined as < 0.1 ng/ml) Re-treatment with any form of AD Development of androgen-independent PC (AIPC) Use of deferred local therapy Measurements of PSA were made at 3-month intervals or less during treatment with TAB and at approximately 3-4 month intervals during FM. Blood samples were assayed for PSA at our clinic or by local community laboratories. Baseline and follow-up T levels were also measured at 3-month intervals until T levels reached baseline levels or a plateau. Testosterone was also measured during finasteride maintenance to assess androgen recovery. Complete blood counts and comprehensive chemistry panels including liver function tests were performed regularly while on TAB. Quality of Life (QOL): Prior to June 2001, at the majority of patient visits, clinical symptoms and adverse effects were recorded but not systematically logged in the TAB database. Since June of 2004 we have recorded QOL via hand held tablet based computers. The Cancer Care Monitor (CCM) is a symptom-based scale developed for administration on pen-based computers. The CCM provides ratings on 38 physical, psychological, and functional oriented items that comprise six symptom scales and one global QOL index. All additive scales are then converted to normalized T scores. CCM items can be scored as a reliable and valid measure of constructs related to physical, psychological, and functional status, and global health-related QOL in adult cancer patients (Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 26 No. 6 December 2003).

RESULTS Pre-treatment Characteristics (n=174) Mean Median Range Age 66 67 46-86 PSA 11.9 8.2 0.4-59.8 Gleason 6.7 7 4 10 Testosterone 396 377 154-819 Mean Count Median Count PSA < 10 10 20 > 20 11.9 6.1 13.8 28.5 174 103 40 31 Gleason 4 6 7 8-10 7 6 7 8 174 77 74 23 Stage T1c T2a T2b T2c T3 Count 71 61 15 4 17 High Risk PC Characteristics: Mean Median Range PSA 20.4 20.5 4.1-59.8 PSA > 20 (n=31) 28.5 - - Clinical stage T3: 17 men Gleason Sum 8 10: 23 men Gleason 4+3: 34 / 74 GS=7 57 / 174 patients with classic High Risk CL-PC PSA Control with TAB-FM Median time to achieve PSA < 0.1 4 months (range 1-10) Median duration of TAB = 13 months (range 10-27)

Median follow-up = 60 months Mean current PSA = 2.6 ng/ml Range (0.1 16.1) Mean current Testosterone = 493 Follow-up for the first 100 men in series: Mean PSA: 3.2 ng/ml (0.1 16.1) Median follow-up: 78 months Minimum follow-up: 51 months Longest follow-up: 159 months Disease Specific survival is 99.4%.

TIME COURSE OF PSA AND TESTOSTERONE RECOVERY AFTER 13 MONTHS OF TRIPLE ANDROGEN BLOCKADE 12 10 PSA Testosterone 600 500 PSA 8 6 4 400 300 200 TESTOSTERONE 2 100 0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 MONTHS 0

Characteristics of Men in Cycle #2 Androgen Deprivation Age Stage bpsa GS C#1 C#1 Off Start End ADT1 bpsa2 T2 C#2 C#2 Off Time f/u Start End ADT2 Off Notes 63 T3 13.94 7 Jun-00 Aug-01 35 13.1 433 Jun-04 53 66% Renal Cell 55 T1C 51.31 8 Feb-99 Mar-00 22 26.0 451 Jan-02 45 49% Follow up lost 59 T1C 22.79 7 Apr-98 May-99 35 14.1 450 Apr-02 Jan-03 25 82 73% 54 T3 4.5 8 Mar-97 Apr-98 32 6.9 893 Dec-00 51 63% Brachytherapy 65 T1C 18 10 Oct-95 Dec-96 69 32.0 460 Sep-02 Jan-04 11 104 77% 62 T2A 8.7 9 Apr-97 Jul-98 62 13.0 520 Sep-03 Apr-04 10 96 75% 68 T2A 18.6 9 Jun-98 Jul-99 41 15.2 460 Dec-02 May-03 21 80 78% 77 T3 43 9 Apr-98 Jun-99 26 14.7 465 Aug-01 Aug-02 16 82 51% C#3 65 T2A 59.8 7 Mar-98 Apr-99 25 23.0 494 May-01 Mar-02 19 83 53% C#3 72 T1C 13.5 8 Jun-97 Jul-98 64 18.8 267 Oct-03 92 70% On ADT 69 T2C 19.2 8 May-98 Jun-99 27 25.0 581 Sep-01 May-02 n/a 49 55% CAD 69 T2A 3.97 8 Jun-98 Aug-99 43 11.9 450 Mar-03 May-04 9 80 65% 66 T1C 14.4 7 May-99 Jul-00 43 8.2 810 Feb-04 Nov-04 3 69 67% 73 T3 26 7 Aug-98 Sep-99 39 7.0 683 Dec-02 Nov-03 15 78 69% 70 T1C 36.45 6 Mar-98 Apr-99 38 112.0 465 Jun-02 Mar-04 n/a 72 53% Met AIPC 57 T1C 23.71 6 Jul-99 Oct-00 31 15.1 917 May-03 Feb-04 15.1 67 47% 60 T3 22 7 Mar-00 May-01 27 16.8 671 Aug-03 Jul-04 16.8 59 46% 50 T3B 20.7 7 Sep-00 Jan-02 23 12.3 489 Jan-04 Jan-05 12.3 52 45% 81 T3 10.0 7 Mar-97 May-98 77 13.8 421 Oct-04 13.8 95 81% On C#2 ADT Cycle #2 of AD initiated in 19 / 174 (11%) men 18 / 19 men presented with High Risk CL-PC 1 man developed AIPC with metastases Succumbed to AIPC 6 years after diagnosis 39 / 57 men with High Risk PC have yet to require a 2nd cycle at a median follow-up of 5 years

Deferred Local Therapy (DLT) after Triple Androgen Blockade Stage bpsa GS TAB Start TAB End Date DLT f/u to DLT DLT T3 T2B T1C 4.5 8 3/97 4/98 3/01 48m EBXRT + Seeds 7.32 7 6/98 8/99 1/04 67m EBXRT + Seeds 6.3 7 1/98 2/99 10/03 69m R.P. T1C 6.7 7 1/98 4/99 12/03 71m Proton Beam XRT T2A T2A 8.91 6 8/01 10/02 8/03 24m Seeds 8.47 6 11/96 11/97 12/03 85m Seeds Quality of Life Data QOL data available from 123/174 men 39 with follow-up < 24 months 87 with follow-up => 24 months Since 07-30-2004: 259 CCM reports Mean # visits: 2.1 (1-14) QOL Median follow-up: 43 months

Severity Grade by Domain T-Scores Item name Value Severity grade Count Percent Treatment Side Effects <=65 1 123 100.00 > 65 2 0 0.0 Impaired Ambulation <=65 1 102 82.93 > 65 2 21 17.07 Despair/Depression <=65 1 119 96.75 > 65 2 4 3.25 Distress <=65 1 117 95.12 > 65 2 6 4.88 General Physical Symptoms <=65 1 115 93.50 > 65 2 8 6.50 Impaired Performance <=65 1 105 85.37 > 65 2 18 14.63 Quality of Life <=45 1 17 13.82 > 45 2 106 86.18 Physical, psychological, and general symptom normalized T-Scores were assessed for all men and stratified by follow-up < or > 24 months. All men, regardless of follow-up, report favorable psychological and general function scores consistent with lack of impacting or enduring toxicity from TAB-FM. Review of specific physical symptoms scores reveal mild problems with fatigue (1.83) and sleep habits (1.45) as well as moderate complaints of decreased sexual interest (3.38) Men in the first 24 months report higher complaints of decreased sexual enjoyment/interest than man after 24 months (4.49 vs. 2.84) Mild complaints regarding fatigue, sweats (hot flashes), and difficulty sleeping are also more pronounced in the first 24 months compared to after

Mean Severity Scores: Physical symptoms Fatigue Sweating 0 24 months > 24 months 2.54 1.5 1.69 0.59 sexual enjoyment 4.49 2.84 Difficulty w/ sleep 2.56 0.9 Compared with normative data from validation trials of the CCM, men treated with TAB-FM enjoy significantly greater physical functioning, general health, and freedom from worry than the average cancer patient. Quality of Life Before & After TAB Mean T-Score value for most recent visit: Men with 1 to 24 month follow-up Item name Mean Std Min Max N General Physical Symptom 47.87 10.13 28.81 69.62 39 Distress (Acute Distress) 46.66 9.33 37.93 71.97 39 Despair/Depression 47.85 8.15 42.92 71.31 39 Treatment Side Effects 41.74 Impaired Ambulation 48.61 Impaired Performance 44.52 5.88 34.96 57.59 39 6.32 46.61 72.65 39 10.99 36.32 71.41 39 Quality of Life 56.66 9.34 29.06 73.54 39

Mean T-Score value for most recent visit: Men with > 24 month follow-up Item name Mean Std Min Max N General Physical Symptom 43.28 9.61 28.81 65.13 80 Distress (Acute Distress) 44.05 8.20 37.93 65.95 82 Despair/Depression 46.81 5.95 42.92 62.96 81 Treatment Side Effects 40.96 6.67 34.96 59.53 79 Impaired Ambulation 52.13 10.49 46.61 76.85 82 Impaired Performance 46.81 11.96 36.32 71.41 82 Quality of Life 57.02 10.69 33.86 73.54 79 T-test for QOL T-Scores Item name Mean 0-24 month >24 P-value for T-test Total N General Physical Symptom 47.87 43.28 0.0180 119 Distress (Acute Distress) 46.66 44.05 0.1196 121 Despair/Depression 47.85 46.81 0.4775 120 Treatment Side Effects 41.74 40.96 0.5356 118 Impaired Ambulation 48.61 52.13 0.0239 121 Impaired Performance 44.52 46.81 0.3151 121 Quality of Life 56.66 57.02 0.8613 118

DISCUSSION Despite optimism and enthusiasm, there are currently no markers to reliable discriminate men with CL-PC for whom an intervention may be beneficial. For patients, and most physicians, in North America, observation alone is unpalatable. Given the enduring complications of impotence & incontinence and the high probability of PSA recurrence, increasing numbers of men will refuse local therapy. We have demonstrated that a single 13 month cycle of TAB-FM is a reasonable management strategy for CL-PC. Use of TAB-FM does not preclude local therapy in the future. Long-term follow-up shows excellent PSA control and more importantly a disease specific survival rate of > 99%. Toxicity of TAB-FM is predictable and reversible. QOL data, while still immature, confirms reversibility of toxicity. CCM questionnaires are being modified to greater reflect the specific issues associated with AD in general. We are currently using TAB-FM in the setting of an IRB approved clinical trial to further obtain toxicity data and define the time course of QOL change. TAB-FM should be utilized and tested more broadly in the prostate cancer community. The authors acknowledge and appreciate the participation of Barry Fortner, Ph.D., and Ling Zhu, M.S., Ph.D. for their assistance with management of CCM generated QOL data and statistics.