Toxicity of mineral oil hydrocarbons

Similar documents
Mineral oil hydrocarbons in food

Hydrocarbon Waxes: The MOSH that are no MOSH. Dr. Dirk F. Danneels European Wax Federation. Mobile:

Mineral oil hydrocarbons in food

Gesundheitliche Risiken durch Mineralölkomponenten in kosmetischen Mitteln

MINERAL HYDROCARBONS IN COSMETIC LIP CARE PRODUCTS. ***** Recommendation *****

EXTERNAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT

Mineral oil hydrocarbons in food: adhesives for food packaging as a source

Highly refined mineral oils in cosmetics: Health risks are not to be expected according to current knowledge

In vitro metabolic study on alkanes in hepatic microsomes from humans and rats 1

This initiative is in line with our organisations aim to ensure product safety and consumer protection.

Mineral oils in food; a review of toxicological data and an assessment of the dietary exposure in the Netherlands

EVAL EVOH as a functional Barrier against Mineral Oil Migration from Cardboard Packaging

Proceedings of Mocrinis II. 18 October 2017 Brussels

Scientific Opinion on Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons in Food 1

MOSH Toxicology Considerations

chronic toxicity studies on white oils

- draft scientific opinion -

SCREENING-LEVEL HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION

OpenFoodTox and Other Open Source In silico EFSA. Jean Lou Dorne Senior Scientific Officer Scientific Committee and Emerging Risks Unit EFSA

STUDIES TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF RESIDUES OF VETERINARY DRUGS IN HUMAN FOOD: GENERAL APPROACH TO ESTABLISH AN ACUTE REFERENCE DOSE

FEDIOL code of practice for the management of mineral oil hydrocarbons presence in vegetable oils and fats intended for food uses

Risk assessment of mycotoxins: the EFSA approach. Katleen Baert Scientific officer, EFSA

Dr. Josef Schlatter Member of the Scientific Committee and EFSA s WG on Novel Foods

Part 2. Chemical and physical aspects

5.17 PENTHIOPYRAD (253)

Analysis of mineral oil and synthetic

The European Commission non-food Scientific Committees Scientific Committee on consumer safety - SCCS

EFSA Info Session Pesticides 26/27 September Anja Friel EFSA Pesticides Unit (Residues team)

Trilateral meeting on perchlorate risk assessment Trilateral meeting report of the meeting on , Parma. (Agreed on )

Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion and Toxicology

Read-across illustrative example

DOSE SELECTION FOR CARCINOGENICITY STUDIES OF PHARMACEUTICALS *)

Martin Lommatzsch Gottfried-Hagener-Str. 60 D Köln. Report

AS Application Note 1801

Scientific Opinion on the re-evaluation of candelilla wax (E 902) as a food additive 1

Globally relevant content. Dr. Monika Tönnießen June 2016 Mineral Oil Components in Food Packaging Adhesives

REASONED OPINION. European Food Safety Authority 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

Risk Assessment Report on Tris (nonylphenyl)phosphite (TNPP)

Methodologies for development of human health criteria and values for the lake Erie drainage basin.

European public MRL assessment report (EPMAR)

Criteria for toxicological characterization metabolites and testing strategy

Module 34: Legal aspects, ADI and GRAS status of food additives

ADOPTED: 8 September 2015 PUBLISHED: 29 September 2015

SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF FOOD CONTACT MATERIALS. Threshold of Toxicological Concern Lisette Krul

Risk assessment plasticizers from erotic objects

Statistical analysis supporting the development of the guidance on dermal absorption

MOSH/MOAH QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

ICH Topic S1C(R2) Dose Selection for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals. Step 5

5.15 HEXYTHIAZOX (176)

Conflict of Interest Statement

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Calcium sulphate for use as a source of calcium in food supplements 1

Data and Knowledge Fusion: Supporting Toxicology, Health Effects Endpoints Analysis & Human Health Risk Assessment

WHO/SDE/WSH/04.08/64s. Trihalomethanes in drinking-water Summary statement

Current status of Benchmark Dose Modeling for 3-Monochloropropane-1,2-diol (3-MCPD)

Section 5.2: Pharmacokinetic properties

Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Foods- WHO Principles and Methods

Opinion of the Scientific Panel on food additives, flavourings, processing aids and materials in contact with food (AFC) on a request related to

Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food on an additional list of monomers and additives for food contact materials (adopted the 18 September 1998)

APPLICATION FOR AUTHORISATION: ESTABLISHING REFERENCE DNELS FOR BBP

European monitoring of mineral oil. The European Commission s science and knowledge service Joint Research Centre

Overview of the procedures currently used at EFSA for the assessment of dietary exposure to chemical substances

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE

5.36 THIOPHANATE-METHYL (077)

1 OJ L 354, , p OJ L 80, , p. 19.

GSC CODEX MESSAGE CCFA48/2016/25

Waxes and Related Materials

Safe Adhesives for Food Packaging: Risk Assessment Toolbox

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Date: 8 March Risk assessment of health hazards from epoxidised soybean oil (ESBO) migrated from lids used on glass containers of baby food

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids (CEF) 2, 3

Scientific Opinion on the safety assessment of the substance ethylene glycol dipalmitate, CAS No , for use in food contact materials 1

Ongoing review of legislation on cadmium in food in the EU: Background and current state of play

MOSH/MOAH Analysis Online LC/GC System with Chronect -LC/GC

Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food on

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Statement of the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain. (Question No EFSA-Q )

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Guidance on selected default values to be used by the EFSA Scientific Committee, Scientific Panels and Units in the absence of actual measured data 1

Dithianon DITHIANON (180)

CHMP Safety Working Party s response to the PDCO regarding aluminium hydroxide contained in allergen products

Guidelines of the Scientific Committee on Food for the development of tolerable upper intake levels for vitamins and minerals

Risk Assessment Report on Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP) Human Health Part. CAS No.: EINECS No.:

The Toxicology Of Mineral Oil At Dermal Exposure Juan-Carlos Carrillo (Shell) BfR December 7-8, 2017

Dose and Response for Chemicals

Prof. Monika Neuhäuser-Berthold Justus Liebig Universität Giessen NDA Panel Member, Vice-Chair of WG Novel Foods, Chair of WG DRV for Vitamins

EVALUATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN CLAY TARGET FRAGMENTS AND SURFACE SOIL AT SHOT GUN RANGE SITES Presenter: Glenn Hoeger and Brian

Minutes of EFSA-ANSES Expert Meeting on Bisphenol A (BPA) Art. 30 Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 Held on 3 December 2014, Paris (France)

Evaluation of active substances in plant protection products Residues Anja Friel European Food Safetey Authority, Parma/ Italy

Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain

Submission for Natamycin

FAQs on bisphenol A in consumer products

BENZETHONIUM CHLORIDE

Classification of developmentally toxic pesticides, low dose effects, mixtures perspective of the industry

Risk Management Option Analysis Conclusion Document

b Public Consultation on Aspartame: ISA COMMENTS

Toxicological Intake Values for Priority Contaminants in Soil

HIGH PRODUCTION VOLUME (HPV) CHEMICAL CHALLENGE PROGRAM LUBRICATING OIL BASESTOCKS CATEGORY ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT. Submitted to the US EPA

How end-consumer concerns drive raw material innovation in food packaging

A Weight of Evidence Approach to Cancer Assessment. Alan R Boobis Imperial College London

EFSA Info Session on Applications. Technical meeting on food flavourings applications. Parma, 20 th January 2015

Using the TTC for evaluation of substances ingested at low levels through food: Challenges and perspectives

Transcription:

Toxicity of mineral oil hydrocarbons Marco Binaglia Unit on Biological Hazards and Contaminants

OUTLINE EFSA s view on mineral oil saturated hydrocarbons (MOSH) in food New data on toxicity and accumulation of MOSH Implications for human dietary risk assessment 2

INTRODUCTION Mineral oil hydrocarbons (MOH) are present in food from many sources, following intended uses of food grade MOH or contamination via different routes Depending on the source, the composition of MOH mixtures varies Main sources of occurrence are Contamination via the environment Food processing Migration from food contact materials Food additives Pesticides The complexity of MOH preclude the possibility to identify toxicological hazards based on single substance properties. 3

EFSA ASSESSMENTS OF MOH Food grades MOH have been evaluated by EFSA for several applications. The two most recent opinions were adopted by the ANS Panel for food additive applications: High viscosity mineral oils (EFSA, 2009) Medium viscosity (class I) mineral oils (EFSA, 2013) These evaluations are relative to specific products and applications, without considering the cumulative exposures from different sources. In 2012 the CONTAM Panel issued a Scientific Opinion assessing the risks to human health related to the the range of MOH that have been detected in food. 4

TOXICITY OF MOSH TOXICOKINETICS Oral absorption decreases with increasing carbon number. Virtually no absorption at > C 50. Branched-alkanes are slightly less absorbed than linear and cyclo-alkanes of comparable molecular weights. Alkanes are metabolised to the fatty alcohols and generally to fatty acids. Linear alkanes more easily metabolised than cyclic- and branchedalkanes. Species (and strain) differences: Biotransformation of heptadecane (in vitro microsome incubation) Human >> Rat Wistar rat > Sprague Dawley rat > Fischer rat 1 MOSH with carbon number between C 16 and C 45 can accumulate in the organism. High accumulation potential observed in Fischer 344 rats. Accumulation in different tissues, such as adipose tissue, lymph nodes, liver and spleen, is observed in humans 2. 1 Cravedi and Perdu, 2012. 2 Concin et al., 2008; Barp et al., 2014, 2015. 5

TOXICITY OF MOSH Laboratory toxicity data are available for a series of refined MOSH grades used/proposed as food additives. The main limitation of these data is that food grades mineral oils and waxes are classified mainly by physico-chemical properties, and not by chemical composition: Name Viscosity at 100 C (mm 2 /s) Average relative molecular mass Carbon number at 5% distillation point Microcrystalline wax 11 500 25 High melting point wax (HMPW) Low melting point wax 3.3 380 22 Mineral oil (high viscosity) P100(H) >11 500 28 Mineral oil (medium and low viscosity) class I P70(H) 8.5 11 480 500 25 Mineral oil (medium and low viscosity) class II N70(H) 7.0 8.5 400 480 22 Mineral oil (medium and low viscosity) class III P15(H), N15(H) 3.0 7.0 300 400 17 6

TOXICITY OF MOSH Main findings in food grade oils and waxes Negative results in genotoxicity tests Following 13-week exposure in female Fischer rats, formation of microgranulomas are observed in the liver and mesenteric lymph node (MLN). MLN microgranulomas are considered adaptive changes to high exposure to high MW substances with poor absorption, not progressing to adverse effects following longer exposure. Hepatic microgranulomas are associated to adverse effects (inflammatory response, cell death and fibrosis). Other species and other rats strains show lower sensitivity to these effects Different grades shows different potency, LMPW > Class II and III low and medium viscosity oils > others Chronic study with P70(H) and P100(H) showed no progression of liver and MLN microgranulomas into a prolonged inflammatory response or other severe pathological changes. 7

ACCEPTABLE DAILY INTAKES JECFA (2002, 2012) EFSA (2009, 2013) ADI (mg/kg bw per day) NOAEL (mg/kg bw per day) Uncertainty factor Comments ADI (mg/kg bw per day) NOAEL (mg/kg bw per day) Uncertainty factor Comments High viscosity P100(H) Medium and low viscosity, class I P70(H) Medium and low viscosity, class II N70(H) 0 20 1 951 100 0 10 1 200 100 0 0.01* (2) (200) 90 day NOAEL 2 year NOAEL 90 day NOAEL 12 1 200 100 12 1 200 100 2 year NOAEL 2 year NOAEL Medium and low viscosity, class III P15(H), N15(H) 0 0.01* (2) (200) 90 day NOAEL Microcrystalline wax (HMPW) 0 20 1 951 100 90 day NOAEL Quantum satis *temporary ADI, withdrawn in 2012 The CONTAM Panel did not consider any of the existing ADIs as relevant for the risk assessment of MOSH in food 8

OUTCOME OF CONTAM PANEL OPINION Considering the formation of liver microgranulomas as the critical endpoint, The CONTAM Panel concluded that there is potential concern associated to the current background exposure to MOSH. A number of recommendations for generation of further data were also issued: Future monitoring should distinguish between MOSH and MOAH, and between subclasses of MOSH based on carbon numbers and chemical structures. Human relevance of liver microgranulomas observed in rat should be investigated. The potential of MOSH to induce altered immune functions following oral exposure should be investigated. Toxicological evaluation of MOH should focus on the molecular mass range and structural sub-classes, rather than chemico-physical properties such as viscosity. 9

EFSA FUNDED STUDY ON TOXICITY AND BIOACCUMULATION OF MOSH Objectives of the EFSA call Study of accumulation and toxicity of a broad MOSH mixture representative of the range to which humans are exposed via the diet Identification of the fraction(s) based on carbon number and chemical structure with higher bioaccumulation potentials Analysis of the correlation between accumulation and formation of hepatic microgranulomas Analysis of the correlation between the changes in immune functions and the formation of microgranulomas Study of the autoimmune response to oral exposure to MOSH The EFSA grant was awarded by a consortium formed by INRA (coordinator) and NIPH (with KLZH as subcontractor) Two year project finalised in September 2016, with final report published: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.en-1090/epdf (Cravedi et al., 2017) 10

OUTLINE OF THE STUDY 1. Subchronic oral toxicity/bioaccumulation study with broad MOSH mixture in female Fischer 344 rats. 2. Subchronic study of autoimmune response following oral exposure to broad MOSH mixture in dark Agouti rats. 3. Subchronic toxicity/bioaccumulation study with three MOSH fractions in female Fischer 344 rats. 11

1. SUBCHRONIC STUDY WITH BROAD MOSH MIXTURE 1. A broad MOSH mixture with an approximately constant concentration of hydrocarbons per carbon atom was prepared 11 13 15 18 20 26 30 36 40 44 55 C 20 /min 350 C 30 d 60 d 90 d 90d+30 d 120 d 2. Five rats/timepoint/dose exposed up to 120 days to 0, 40, 400 or 4000 mg MOSH/kg feed (approximately 0, 2, 22 or 222 mg/kg bw per day) 3. - MOSH levels in liver, spleen, adipose tissue and remaining carcass were measured. - Liver histopathology analysis (incidence of microgranulomas) and immune functions were studied 12

BIOACCUMULATION OF MOSH BROAD MIXTURE Accumulation occurred mainly in the liver Clearance was observed in all tissues but in the adipose tissue following a 30 day recovery period No steady state for tissue bioaccumulation was reached after 120 days Accumulation rate was relatively higher at lower doses (concentrations in the tissues increased by factors 2.6-11.5 in different tissues when going from 400 to 4000 mg/kg) 13

BIOACCUMULATION OF MOSH BROAD MIXTURE 100 Normalized area ratio (%) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Liver Spleen Fat 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 Segment (n-alkane) Accumulation varied both in term of carbon numbers and chemical classes in different tissues GCxGC analysis revealed a preferential accumulation of n-alkanes/little branched paraffins with low carbon number in the adipose tissue. In the liver, a slightly higher retention was observed for strongly branched (cyclo)alkanes, likely due to the more difficult biotransformation and/or elimination. 14

TOXICITY OF MOSH BROAD MIXTURE Slight increase in liver weight, mainly at 4000 mg/kg Liver microgranulomas observed only at 4000 mg/kg after 90 or 120 days of exposure No indication of pro-inflammatory changes or other signs of hepatotoxicity No significant changes in immune response were observed, but a decreased antibody production was observed at the highest dose. 15

2. STUDY OF AUTOIMMUNE RESPONSE IN AGOUTI RATS Oral exposure to pristane or to the broad MOSH did not result in an increase either in arthritis score, or in a series of arthritis markers in serum Intra-dermal injection of pristane induced arthritis symptoms (positive control) 3 3 Andreassen et al., 2017 16

3. SUBCHRONIC STUDY WITH 3 MOSH FRACTIONS 1. Three mixtures were selected to investigate the different accumulation and toxicity at different carbon number distributions and the possible role of n-alkanes: S-C25: MOSH mainly below C25, lower viscosity L-C25: MOSH mainly above C25, higher viscosity L-C25W: 1:1 mixture of L-C25 and a wax (W) 2. Eight rats/group were exposed for 120 days either to 0 or to 40, 1000 or 4000 mg mixture/kg feed 3. - MOSH levels in liver, spleen, adipose tissue and remaining carcass were measured. - Liver histopathology analysis and immune functions were studied 17

BIOACCUMULATION OF THE 3 MOSH FRACTIONS Tissue accumulation was mixture specific, with higher retention for S-C25 and n-alkanes in the liver and adipose tissue. 18

SELECTIVE RETENTION IN DIFFERENT TISSUES High retention of n-alkanes in liver and adipose tissue Preferential retention of lower C numbers (S-C25) in adipose tissue in comparison to the liver (C-25(W)) Accumulation in liver centered around C29-C30 19

BROAD MIXTURE FRACTIONS n-alkane retention from L-C25W Retention (%) Liver Spleen Adipose tissue n C25 0.8 0.04 3.9 n C27 3.1 0.11 6.8 n C30 10.8 0.49 2.7 n C33 7.5 0.89 0.1 High retention of linear alkanes Different distributions in liver and adipose tissue Beside n-alkanes: For S-C25 observed preferential accumulation of multibranched alkanes (and polycyclic MOSH) in liver, n-alkyl monocyclic alkanes in adipose tissue For L-C25 preferential accumulation of n-alkyl monocyclic alkanes, mainly in liver. 20

TOXICITY OF BROAD MIXTURE FRACTIONS Increased spleen and liver weights were observed in rats exposed to L-C25 and L-C25W. Hepatic microgranulomas and inflammatory changes were observed at all L-C25W doses and mid/high S-C25 doses. No effects on immune functions were observed. 800 * * * * 60 * * * * 600 400 200 40 20 Ganulomas / cm 2 Lymphocyte clusters / cm 2 CTR L-C25-400 L-C25-1000 L-C25-4000 S-C25-400 S-C25-1000 S-C25-4000 L-C25W-400 L-C25W-1000 L-C25W-4000 CTR L-C25-400 L-C25-1000 L-C25-4000 S-C25-400 0 S-C25-1000 S-C25-4000 L-C25W-400 L-C25W-1000 L-C25W-4000 MOSH in feed 0 MOSH in feed 21

OVERALL CONCLUSIONS In female Fischer 344 rats accumulation of MOSH occurs mainly in the liver and to a lesser extent in the adipose tissue. Accumulation depends on the composition of the MOSH mixture. In the liver, the accumulation is higher at C>25, whereas lower C numbers accumulate in the adipose tissue. n-alkanes (and unidentified isoalkanes) accumulate preferentially in the adipose tissue, but also in liver. MOSH exposure resulted in a significant increase in absolute and relative liver weights. Very strong granuloma formation was observed after ingestion of the waxcontaining L-C25W mixture, suggesting that n-alkanes have an impact on this toxicological endpoint in Fischer 344 rats. This pattern appeared to be similar for pro-inflammatory changes in the liver (increased lymphoid cell clusters). 22

HUMAN RELEVANCE OF MOSH ACCUMULATION? MOSH are detected in human liver, MLN, spleen and adipose tissue. A recent study in 37 (25-91 years old) subjects showed substantially high levels 4 Human liver Rat liver 161 mg/kg 1600 mg/kg 220 mg/kg Estimated human dietary exposure: 0.03-0.3 mg/kg bw per day Exposure to broad MOSH mixture: 2-22 mg/kg bw per day Longer retention? Underestimated exposure? Different sites of accumulation: 95% MOSH accumulate in human adipose tissue 50% accumulation in Fischer rat liver Different retention profiles n-alkanes do not appear to accumulate substantially in human liver and adipose tissue. 4 Barp et al., 2014, 2015, 2017(a,b). 23

HUMAN RELEVANCE OF LIVER MICROGRANULOMAS? Lipogranulomas containing MOH have been observed in liver and spleen in a series of epidemiological studies, at higher incidence between the 70s and the end of the 80s 5. In most cases the correlation with dietary exposure to MOH was not clear or not confirmed. Lipogranulomas were generally not associated with signs of inflammation or other pathological effects or clinical abnormalities 6. Severe liver lesions were observed in cases of intoxication in which the extension of lipogranulomas affected the liver architecture 7. The current incidence of hepatic granulomas in human is likely <<4% 8. 5 Boinott and Margolis, 1970; Dincsoy et al., 1982; Cruickshank et al., 1984. 6 Carlton et al., 2001. 7 Trivalle et al., 1991. 8 Lagana et al., 2010. 24

OVERALL POINTS OF DISCUSSION FOR MOSH IN FOOD Scientific debate should take place on the following aspects: Relevance of classification of MOSH based on viscosity and carbon numbers. Relevance of Fischer rats as a laboratory model to test MOSH. Relevance of human bioaccumulation as a toxicological endpoint. Scientific basis of the currently established ADIs. 25

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Jean-Pierre Cravedi Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique Jan Alexander Unni Cecilie Nygaard Norwegian Institute of Public Health Koni Grob Kantonales Labor Zürich 26

STAY CONNECTED! Subscribe to www.efsa.europa.eu/en/news/newsletters www.efsa.europa.eu/en/rss Engage with careers www.efsa.europa.eu/en/engage/careers Follow us on Twitter @efsa_eu @plants_efsa @methods_efsa