The Oncofertility Consortium : Policy and Guidelines Statement

Similar documents
Responsible Conduct of Research: Responsible Authorship. David M. Langenau, PhD, Associate Professor of Pathology Director, Molecular Pathology Unit

Code of Practice on Authorship

INOVIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. INVESTIGATOR CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

Authors and Co-Authors,

Information Technology Solutions

Scope of Practice for the Diagnostic Ultrasound Professional

Principles of publishing

LCFA/IASLC LORI MONROE SCHOLARSHIP IN TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH 2017 REQUEST FOR APPLICATION (RFA)

ALS ACT (Accelerated Therapeutics)

UCD School of Psychology Guidelines for Publishing

Memorandum of Understanding on the working relations between the European Commission and the European Stability Mechanism

Part I Overview: The Master Club Manager (MCM) Program

Chapter Coordinator Guide

Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Review of Historical Financial Statements

MIAMI CHILDREN S HOSPITAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS 3000 ASSURANCE ENGAGEMENTS OTHER THAN AUDITS OR REVIEWS OF HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONTENTS

Policy and Procedures on Evidence-Based Practice

TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE

DATE: August 17, Document Title: Amendment to PIN Regarding Affiliation Agreements of Community and Migrant Health Centers

GUIDELINES ON AUTHORSHIP OF ABSTRACTS, PRESENTATIONS AND PAPERS

GUIDELINES: PEER REVIEW TRAINING BOD G [Amended BOD ; BOD ; BOD ; Initial BOD ] [Guideline]

Policy of Conflict of Interest in Clinical Research

1. PURPOSE 1.1. To utilize a standard policy for Fire & Rescue relating to use of controlled substances, alcohol and testing.

Policies, Procedures and Guidelines

SUPERVISION OF RADIOLOGY TRAINEES IN TRAINING DEPARTMENTS GUIDELINES

IAASB Main Agenda (March 2005) Page Agenda Item. DRAFT EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM ISA 701 and ISA 702 Exposure Drafts February 2005

Non-Executive Member Disciplinary Review Process

IPC Athletics Classification Rules and Regulations

Policies and Procedures to Apply for Authorization of Research Projects at IPC Events

1. Procedure for Academic Misconduct Committees, virtual panels and formal hearings

The Atlantic Canada Association of Reflexology Therapists

Canadian HIV/AIDS Pharmacists Network. Association Canadienne des Pharmaciens en VIH/SIDA. Terms of Reference

Saint Mary s College High Potential Program Peer Mentor (FWS Position)

Pre-Employment Psychological Evaluation Guidelines

ISA 540, Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and Related Disclosures Issues and Task Force Recommendations

Authorship. Dennis Brown, Ph. D., Prof. Medicine, Editor Physiological Reviews. With input from:

EVMS Authorship Guidelines

Understanding the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and its Conflicts of Interest Policies

Authorship: why not just toss a coin?

Paediatric and Adolescent HIV Research Grant Programme

Auditing Standards and Practices Council

Barnardo s Scotland. Strengthening for the Future. Consultation Response

Council on Education of the Deaf Office of Program Accreditation

Loving Support Award of Excellence Gold Award Application Instructions

TRAUMA RECOVERY/HAP OPERATING GUIDELINES

This SOP applies to all IRB administrative staff, members and investigators. IRB members, administrative staff and investigators.

Re: National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard; Proposed Rule; Request for Comments, 83 Fed. Reg (May 4, 2018), Docket No.

Classification Rules and Regulations

Athlete Classification Rules. as of January 1, 2018

Authorship Guidelines for CAES Faculty Collaborating with Students

Update on the NCI Cancer Centers Program Henry P. Ciolino, Ph.D. Director, Office of Cancer Centers

IDEAS FOR LEADERSHIP

OPERATIONS MANUAL BANK POLICIES (BP) These policies were prepared for use by ADB staff and are not necessarily a complete treatment of the subject.

The NIH Biosketch. February 2016

Oral Examination Interview Handbook for Candidates

Gavi Alliance Conflict of Interest Policy Version 2.0

Justice Research and Statistics Association CODE OF ETHICS

NAPPO Executive Committee Decision Sheet

Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures

TERMS AND CONDITIONS NATIONAL GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE (GLP) COMPLIANCE MONITORING AUTHORITY

STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. Medication Assisted Treatment For Substance Use Disorder In the New Jersey County Jails

Chapter 18 Section 2. EXPIRED - Department Of Defense (DoD) Cancer Prevention And Treatment Clinical Trials Demonstration

CONSUMER CONSENT, RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Assessment of Impact on Health and Environmental Building Performance of Projects Utilizing the Green Advantage LEED ID Credit

Standard Operating Procedure:

January To: All Local CRN CHAPTERS

Re: Integrity in Professional Ethics: A Discussion Paper

Regulation of the Chancellor

(Tentative Translation)

Nova Scotia Board of Examiners in Psychology. Custody and Access Evaluation Guidelines

Association Agreement

POLICIES AND PROCEDURES for the Organization and Operation of the Council of Allied Societies of the Society for American Archaeology

Classification Rules and Regulations

The Dental Corporation Opportunity

Program Priorities 2018

Cooperative Agreement to Benefit Homeless Individuals-States (CABHI-States) Request for Applications Review

SECTION III GUIDELINES FOR SUBSIDIARY BODIES. SECTION III: Guidelines for Subsidiary Bodies

Standards and Criteria for Approval of Sponsors of Continuing Education for Psychologists. August 2015

Nebraska Department of Education. Statewide Educational Programs and Support Services for Children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

IRB policy and procedures 1. Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College

DISCLOSURE OF ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE/DRUG ABUSE RECORDS. This Policy describes permissible disclosures of Alcohol and Substance/Drug Abuse Records.

Drug and Alcohol Misuse Policy

Type of Review Requested:

Institutional Review Boards and Human Subjects Protection

ISO/TR TECHNICAL REPORT. Non-destructive testing Guidelines for NDT personnel training organizations

International Paralympic Committee Athletics Classification Rules and Regulations. January 2016

Fiona Campbell. ISA 315 (Revised) Responding to Comments to the Exposure Draft. Deputy Chair of the IAASB and Chair of the ISA 315 Task Force

Start-Up Packet to Become a NAMI Affiliate

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD GUIDANCE ON ELECTRONIC INFORMED CONSENT

Responsible Authorship

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Procedure

Para-Taekwondo and Deaf-Taekwondo Classification Rules & Regulations

Updating Primary Kidney Transplant Physician Requirements OPTN/UNOS Membership and Professional Standards Committee

Guidelines for Ethical Conduct of Behavioral Projects Involving Human Participants by High School Students

D.L. Hart Memorial Outcomes Research Grant Program Details

POSITION DESCRIPTION. Employment Status: Maternity Leave Contract 5 months (Jan-May 2018) PURPOSE OF POSITION DESCRIPTION

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY AIRPORT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT RULES OF PROCEDURE

National Cancer Institute Clinical Trial Cooperative Groups

New York Certified Peer Specialist

Transcription:

The Oncofertility Consortium : Policy and Guidelines Statement Policy and Operations Manual (Effective March 12, 2008) Final Approval by Steering Committee November 20, 2008 Revision Approved 9/15/2009 Revision Approved 1/20/2015 Please view disclaimer here: oncofertility.northwestern.edu/disclaimer

TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Page A Statement of Mission 3 Policy on Disclosure of Industrial Activities 4 Guidelines for Authorship 5 Terms and Conditions of Awards Accepted by the Grantee Organization and Principal Investigator (PI and Project Directors) 7 Duties of Steering Committee Chairperson 9 Please view disclaimer here: oncofertility.northwestern.edu/disclaimer Page 2

Please view disclaimer here: oncofertility.northwestern.edu/disclaimer Page 3

POLICY ON DISCLOSURE OF INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES It is appreciated that scientific investigators have numerous scientific collaborations, both within the Oncofertility Consortium as well as independently of it. It is also understood that these collaborations can represent important adjuncts to the Oncofertility Consortium program in providing technological advances, key scientific opportunities, reagent availability, and potential sources of additional funding of projects of mutual interest. It is also recognized that these activities have the potential for conflict of interest, and it is the purpose of this policy to both maximize expeditious transfer of advances derived from the Oncofertility Consortium into practical use for alleviation of a wide variety of medical conditions, as well as to protect the Consortium and its investigators from both actual conflicts of interest, as well as the appearance of such conflict. The following policies were reviewed at the Steering Committee Meeting on March 12, 2008 with original implementation on April 1, 2008. The first and most crucial step to avoid conflict of interest or its appearance is full disclosure. This disclosure would take the form of all Oncofertility Consortium Investigators disclosing all relevant collaborations (scientific collaborations, equity arrangements, industry/consultancy/ownership, etc.) to their local Directors. This would be accompanied by the completion of a written form designed to monitor these activities in an objective fashion. All disclosure material for Consortium personnel remains at the Center site. The individual Center Directors would also submit a full disclosure report to the Chairperson of the Oncofertility Consortium Steering Committee. These disclosures would identify the scientific scope of activities, existence of confidentiality agreements, and any potential areas of overlap of these activities with the Oncofertility Consortium. This overlap would specifically include those within their individual Centers, as well as those with other Oncofertility Consortium projects. Following completion of this initial review and disclosure at the individual Center level, the Center Directors would then eliminate those collaborations which were thought to be of little or no impact upon the Centers programs and request a formal review by the Oncofertility Consortium Steering Committee of those issues deemed to have potential conflict interaction with the Oncofertility Consortium. The purpose of this general discussion would be full disclosure and a dialogue reviewing potential impact of these considerations, and an assurance that the Steering Committee was generally comfortable with these arrangements. In addition, when requested, ranges of remuneration would be listed in order to give the assurance to the Chairperson of the Steering Committee that these arrangements were not in such a range where the actual levels of remuneration itself could represent a conflict of interest. Following discussion of these issues by the Steering Committee, only additions or deletions of the arrangements would then be reviewed in the future as needed. The same process will be conducted by the Oncofertility Consortium Chairperson for the Center Directors with the exception that Center Directors cannot be present during Steering Committee deliberations that consider their own potential conflict issues. Issues of potential conflict discerned by the judgment of the Oncofertility Consortium Chairperson will be referred by him/her to the NIH for further consideration and decision. Please view disclaimer here: oncofertility.northwestern.edu/disclaimer Page 4

Introduction GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORSHIP This document is intended to outline a set of guidelines for distinguishing collaborations that merit co-authorship from those that deserve some other form or recognition. Since it is impossible to establish absolute minimum involvement levels that will be applicable to every situation or circumstance, these are guidelines which should be used to encourage participation at that level which will assure merit as a co-author, rather than serve as exclusionary criteria. Statement of Policy 1. An author must have participated in the study to an extent that he/she is familiar with all major thrusts of the study, is intimately familiar with those aspects of the study within the individual s scientific competency, and can publicly present and defend those components. Hence, determination of inclusion as an author is defined by two major criteria: a) participation at some predetermined level (as indicated in the following section), and b) willingness to take responsibility for the entire manuscript or those designated parts within their area of expertise. 2. Participation (see 1a above) would normally involve a minimum of two of the following components: a) Idea conception or hypothesis(es) development, b) Study or experimental design, c) Data acquisition or study implementation, d) Data analysis or interpretation, e) Drafting and/or revising the manuscript. 3. The primary author is responsible for supervising the execution of the project and as such should be familiar with each of the components outlined above. In addition, the primary author is responsible for assigning authorship, and providing copies of at least a semi-final draft to all authors for review and comment prior to submission. He/she should pay serious attention to co-authors remarks, incorporating appropriate changes. 4. In the event of a dispute about authorship, decisions will be arbitrated by the Steering Committee of the Oncofertility Consortium. 5. Non-critical contributions, technical assistance, or contributions from the above list Please view disclaimer here: oncofertility.northwestern.edu/disclaimer Page 5

but not of sufficient depth or substance to merit authorship can be noted in the acknowledgment section. 6. Specifically excluded as meriting authorship are the following, if they transpire in the absence of additional contributions as listed in section 2 above: a) Patient referral, b) Reagent or tissue provision (e.g., antibody, probe, cdna, tissue), c) Data collection or computer analysis and/o graphing, d) Honorary authorship for repayment for some type of support not directly related to the study or included within section 2 above. 7. All peer reviewed publications must contain an attribution of membership in the Oncofertility Consortium and including the P50 and the specific grant and project number (if applicable) and must be submitted to PubMed Central for an ID # (PMCID). For full papers: This research was supported by the Oncofertility Consortium [NIH P50 HD076188 and (number or numbers, if supported by more than one, and individual project number, if applicable)]. For abstracts: This research was supported by the Oncofertility Consortium [NIH P50 HD076188 and (number or numbers, if supported by more than one, and project number, if applicable]. If a publication does not permit a specific grant number to be listed, then cite This work was supported by the Center for Reproductive Health After Disease [NIH P50HD076188] from the National Institutes of Health National Center for Translational Research in Reproduction and Infertility (NCTRI)" All peer reviewed publications that were supported by NIH funds need to be submitted to PubMed Central for an ID # (PMCID). Detailed instructions about how to submit articles to PubMed Central can be found at http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/. Please view disclaimer here: oncofertility.northwestern.edu/disclaimer Page 6

TERMS OF AWARD The following Terms and Conditions of Award are in addition to, and not in lieu of, otherwise applicable OMB administrative guidelines, HHS, PHS, and NIH grant regulations, policies and procedures, with particular emphasis on HHS regulations at 45 CFR Part 74 and 92. Business management aspects of these awards will be administered by the NICHD Grants Management Branch in accordance with HHS, PHS, and NIH grant administration requirements. 1. Purpose The purpose of these cooperative agreements is to support a coordinated research program of specialized centers pursuing high quality reproductive research with the ultimate goal of facilitating and accelerating translation of basic science knowledge into clinical applications which can be used to regulate fertility or diagnose and treat infertility or reproductive disorders that impact on fertility. 2. Authorities and Responsibilities of Awardees The primary authorities and responsibilities of the awardees are to participate cooperatively with the Steering Committee in the following activities: Pursuit of research objectives consistent with the research scope of the RFA and research approved during the initial peer review; Conduct experiments and collect the resulting data; Analyze, interpret and present results and plans to the Steering Committee for approved activities; Publish results, conclusions, and interpretation of the studies. The awardees will agree to: 1) accept the coordinating role of the Steering Committee which includes evaluating objectives and research goals of the Oncofertility Consortium, and recommending modification, deletion or addition of protocols within the Centers Program; 2) follow any common protocols in which they participate for multicenter projects that are approved by the Steering Committee; and 3) accept the cooperative nature of the group process, including the establishment, where appropriate, of smaller collaborative groups comprised of interacting subprojects and/or cores focused on a particular reproductive research topic area. Awardees will retain custody of and primary rights to their data developed under the award subject to current government policies regarding rights of access as consistent with current HHS, PHS, and NIH policies. Please view disclaimer here: oncofertility.northwestern.edu/disclaimer Page 7

Please view disclaimer here: oncofertility.northwestern.edu/disclaimer Page 8 4. Arbitration When agreement between awardees cannot be reached on scientific/ programmatic issues that may arise after the award, an arbitration panel will be formed. The panel will consist of one person selected by the Principal Investigator, one person selected by NIH staff, and a third person selected by these two members. The decision of the arbitration panel, by majority vote, will be binding. This special arbitration procedure in no way affects the right of an awardee to appeal an adverse action in accordance with PHS regulations at 42 CFR Part 50, Subpart D, and HHS regulations at 45 CFR Part 16.

DUTIES OF THE ONCOFERTILITY CONSORTIUM STEERING COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON 1. Approves the content of the agenda for each Steering Committee Meeting. 2. Guides the general conduct of the Steering Committee Meeting. 3. Recommends, as required, activation of the formal arbitration process specified for the Oncofertility Consortium. 4. Serves as liaison between the Steering Committee and NIH staff. As liaison, conveys information (i.e. meeting minutes) or formal action requests from the Steering Committee to the NIH, as well as information or responses from the NIH to the Steering Committee. Approves and certifies by signature, the Oncofertility Consortium support documents to be submitted with an annual noncompeting, continuation application of individual Oncofertility Consortium project grants that provide assurance for Steering Committee approval of recommended major changes in science directions or budgetary allocations. 5. Reviews and approves the Oncofertility Consortium Research Coordinator s Annual Report to the NIH. 6. Reviews and approves the Disclosure of Potential Conflict of Interest circumstances submitted by the Oncofertility Consortium Center Directors, and forwards to the NIH any issues requiring further consideration and decision. Please view disclaimer here: oncofertility.northwestern.edu/disclaimer Page 9