Effect of a Electrolyte replacement beverage compared with a commercially available Carbohydrate supplement on the rate of fat oxidation during moderate-intensity cycle ergometry exercise INTRODUCTION Carbohydrate (CHO) supplementation has long been known to improve endurance performance, quantified as either an increase in time to fatigue, or an improvement in performance time for completing a fixed distance/ amount of work (e.g. Coyle et al 1983, 1986; Coggan and Coyle 1988; Hargreaves et al., 1984; Below et al., 1995; Jeukendrup et al., 1997; Jeukendrup, 2004; Currell and Jeukendrup, 2008). This improvement in endurance performance is thought to be mediated through the maintenance of euglycaemia and high intramuscular CHO oxidation rates late in exercise when endogenous CHO stores are becoming depleted (e.g. Coyle et al., 1986; Coggan and Coyle 1988; Jentjens et al., 2004; Jeukendrup, 2004). Despite the significant ergogenic effect of CHO supplementation, CHO Supplementation is not always appropriate. CHO supplementation is associated with a marked suppression of fat oxidation, hence reducing the contribution of this substrate to the overall energy expenditure (e.g. Wagenmakers et al., 1993; Horowitz et al., 1997; Jentjens et al, 2004, 2006; Rowlands et al., 2005; Jeukendrup et al., 2006; Wallis et al., 2005; Currell and Jeukendrup, 2008). However, training with low muscle glycogen (which may occur during a prolonged training session, or when training frequency is high- especially in the absence of CHO supplementation) has been suggested to increase the rate of fat oxidation, possibly through enhanced metabolic adaptations in the skeletal muscle (e.g. Yeo et al., 2008; Hulston et al., 2010), increasing the contribution of fat oxidation and decreasing the requirement of CHO oxidation to meet the total energy requirement, which may be potentially important for endurance performance. Furthermore, CHO supplementation may not be appropriate for those engaged in a weight loss programme who are engaged in exercise to promote the achievement of a negative energy, and more important, fat balance.
However, sports drinks do not only contain CHO. Many contain electrolytes (e.g. sodium, potassium etc) to promote fluid uptake and replace electrolytes lost through sweat (to prevent muscle cramps and hyponnatremia). Therefore, while replacing a sports drink containing CHO and electrolytes with water will address issues of dehydration and facilitate increases in the rate of fat oxidation; this is not an appropriate alternative, as electrolyte losses will still occur. An alternative for those wanting to train/ exercise with no CHO supplementation (i.e. following a train low, compete high strategy or for those wanting to promote fat loss), but still replace electrolytes lost during the exercise bout, is to supplement with an electrolyte replacement beverage containing no (or negligible) CHO. While replacing a CHO based beverage with water has been shown to increase the rate of fat oxidation, the effect of supplementing with an electrolyte replacement beverage (to improve fluid uptake and replace essential electrolytes) compared with a CHO based beverage on the rate of fat oxidation has yet to be demonstrated. Therefore, the aim of this investigation was to determine the effect of replacing a CHO based sports drink with an electrolyte based sports drink (containing negligible CHO) on the rate of fat oxidation. It was hypothesised that supplementing with the electrolyte based sports drink would significantly increase the rate of fat oxidation compared with the CHO based beverage. METHODS Subjects Twenty-two healthy, recreationally active males (mean ± standard deviation (SD); age 32 ± 8.5 yr; height 178.5 ± 7.3 cm; mass 79.8 ± 8.6 kg) volunteered to take part in the investigation after providing written informed consent, as approved by the Faculty of Biomedical and Life Sciences Ethical Review Committee, University of Glasgow (in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki). Following familiarisation with the equipment and procedures, subjects visited the laboratory on at least four occasions, with each visit conducted at a similar time of day (± 1 hr) on non-consecutive days. Subjects were instructed to consume their normal diet throughout the testing period, and arrive at the laboratory on the day of the
test rested (no strenuous exercise in the previous 24 hr), and in a fasted state (having consumed nothing but water in the 12hours prior to the test time). Protocol 1: Incremental-ramp test An incremental exercise test (25W.min -1 ) was performed on a computer-controlled electromagnetically-braked cycle ergometer (Excalibur Sport, Lode, Groningen, NL) to the limit of tolerance. Throughout this test inspired and expired volumes (bi-directional turbine, Jaeger TripleV, Hoechberg, Germany) and gas concentrations (chemical fuel cell (O 2 ) and infrared (CO 2 ) analyzers; Jaeger Oxycon Pro, Hoechberg, Germany) were sampled at 50Hz, with the time-aligned volume and gas concentration signals allowing online calculation of breath-by-breath pulmonary gas exchange and ventilatory variables (e.g. O 2 uptake ( V O2 ), CO 2 output ( V CO2 ) and ventilation ( V E )). Prior to each test the gas analyzers were calibrated with one precision-analyzed gas mixture and room air to span the concentration range observed during exercise, with the turbine volume sensor calibrated using a 3-liter syringe (Hans Rudolph, Kansas City, MO). This test allowed estimation of the lactate threshold (LT), using standard pulmonary gas exchange criteria (Whipp et al, 1986), and determination of peak oxygen uptake ( V O2 peak), from the average V O2 for an integral number of breaths over the final ~20s of the incremental phase. Verbal encouragement was given throughout this test. Protocol 2: Sub-LT constant-load tests Each subject then completed two constant-power tests (on separate days) at the power output equivalent to 90% LT (moderate-intensity) on a standard road bike mounted to a computer-controlled indoor trainer (Computrainer, Racermate, WA, USA). Following calibration of the trainer in accordance with manufacturers guidelines (warm-up at 100Watts for 10min to ensure the temperature of the system has stabilised, allowing the rolling resistance to be appropriately set), subjects completed 60min cycling at a constant speed
while in the same gear on the road bike (determined during the familiarisation session and standardised for each subsequent session). 15min prior to the start of the test 250ml of the appropriate beverage was ingested, while during the 60min moderate-intensity ride 1 litre of the appropriate drink was consumed (CHO: 66.6g CHO, 0.64g Na +, 34mg Mg 2+ ; all l. -1 or ELEC 4g CHO, 0.5g Na +, 120mg Mg 2+ ; all l. -1 ), with this split into 250ml doses at time 0, 15, 30 and 45min. In addition, following a 2min runin, 2min expired air samples were collected in Douglas bags every 10min (i.e. between 8-10, 18-20 etc) for estimation of V O2 and V CO2, allowing estimation - via indirect calorimetry of the rate of energy expenditure (EE) and fat and CHO oxidation using the equations described by Frayn (1983), i.e.: Rate of fat oxidation (g.min -1 ) = ( V O2 - V CO2 )/ 0.57 Rate of CHO oxidation (g.min -1 ) = (1.40 * V CO2 - V O2 )/ 0.30 Rate of EE (kj.min -1 ) = (Rate of CHO oxidation * 15.6)/ (Rate of fat oxidation * 39) Statistics Paired Student s t-tests were used to examine any difference in the rate of EE and fat and CHO oxidation between CHO and ELEC conditions. Data are presented as mean ± SE, unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance was accepted when P > 0.05. RESULTS Incremental-ramp test: From the incremental-ramp exercise V O2 peak was 4.14 ± 0.14 l min -1 (52.3 ± 1.8 ml kg -1 min -1 ) and was reached at an average work rate of 341 ± 13 W. LT occurred at 2.19 ± 0.10 l min -1, which was equivalent to 52.7 ± 1.4 % of V O2 peak, giving an average work rate for the moderate-intensity constant-load tests (90% LT) of 113 ± 8 W.
Sub-LT constant-load tests: There was no significant difference in total EE for each constant-load test (CHO: 2283.7 ± 115.8 vs. ELEC: 2269.4 ± 121.8 kj; Figure 1), with this also reflected in the rate of EE (CHO: 38.1 ± 1.9 vs. ELEC: 37.8 ± 2.0 kj.min -1 ;P = 0.727) Figure 1: Mean (± SE) Total Energy expenditure for the moderate-intensity constant-load tests when consuming a carbohydrate based supplement (CHO) or an electrolyte replacement beverage (ELEC) However, although there was no difference in EE, ingestion of ELEC significantly increased the rate (ELEC: 0.47 ± 0.04g min -1 ; P = 0.001; Figure 2A), and consequently the total amount of fat oxidised (ELEC: 28.4 ± 2.3g) during exercise, compared with the ingestion of CHO (Rate: 0.35 ± 0.03g min -1 ; Amount: 21.2 ± 2.0g). Hence, with the ingestion of ELEC the total amount of fat oxidised during the 60min exercise bout was increased by 41.4 ± 10.4%. Consequently, due to the unchanged EE and significant increase in the rate of fat oxidation when consuming ELEC, CHO oxidation rates were significantly decreased when consuming ELEC compared with CHO (CHO: 1.56 ± 0.09 g min -1 vs. ELEC: 1.24 ± 0.10 g min -1 ; P > 0.001; Figure 2B), with the total amount of CHO oxidised also significantly reduced during the exercise bout (CHO: 93.5 ± 5.2 g vs. ELEC: 74.4 ± 6.2 g), reflecting a 20.5 ± 4.7% decrease in the total amount of CHO oxidised when consuming ELEC.
Figure 2: The mean (± SE) of (2A) Rate of fat oxidation and (2B) Rate of CHO oxidation during moderate-intensity constant-load exercise when consuming a carbohydrate based supplement (CHO) or an electrolyte replacement beverage (ELEC). Hence, as a consequence of the increase in the rate of fat oxidation when ingesting ELEC, the proportion of fat contributing to the total EE was significantly greater (CHO: 35.5 ± 2.2 % vs. ELEC: 48.6 ± 3.2 %; P < 0.001) and the proportion of CHO was significantly less (CHO: 64.5 ± 2.2 % vs. ELEC: 51.4 ± 3.2 %; P < 0.001; Figure 3), reflecting a 42.0 ± 9.6 % increase in the contribution of fat oxidation to the energy expenditure during the exercise bout. Figure 3: Contribution of carbohydrate (CHO; Hashed box)) and Fat oxidation (Grey box) to the total energy expenditure when consuming the CHO or Electrolyte replacement drink during the exercise bout. The mean rates (± SE) of substrate utilisation, in addition to the overall difference in the rate of fat oxidation between conditions, are displayed.
CONCLUSION The results of this study suggest that replacing a carbohydrate based sports drink with an electrolyte based beverage containing negligible CHO significantly increased the rate of fat oxidation, and consequently the amount of fat oxidised during the exercise bout, with subjects oxidising, on average, ~41% more fat in this study. This result is consistent with previous research showing an increase in the rate of fat oxidation when water is consumed instead of a CHO based supplement (Wagenmakers et al., 1993; Horowitz et al., 1997; Jentjens et al, 2004, 2006; Rowlands et al., 2005; Jeukendrup et al., 2006; Wallis et al., 2005; Currell and Jeukendrup, 2008). However, supplementing with electrolytes, rather than water, during exercise is important to promote rehydration and replace the electrolytes lost through sweat. REFERENCES 1. Below PR, Mora-Rodriguez R, Gonzalez-Alonso J, and Coyle EF. Fluid and carbohydrate ingestion independently improve performance during 1 h of intense exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27: 200-210, 1995. 2. Coggan AR, and Coyle EF. Effect of carbohydrate feedings during high-intensity exercise. J Appl Physiol 65: 1703-1709, 1988. 3. Coyle EF, Coggan AR, Hemmert MK, and Ivy JL. Muscle glycogen utilization during prolonged strenuous exercise when fed carbohydrate. J Appl Physiol 61: 165-172, 1986. 4. Coyle EF, Hagberg JM, Hurley BF, Martin WH, Ehsani AA, and Holloszy JO. Carbohydrate feeding during prolonged strenuous exercise can delay fatigue. J Appl Physiol 55: 230-235, 1983. 5. Currell K, and Jeukendrup AE. Superior endurance performance with ingestion of multiple transportable carbohydrates. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40: 275-281, 2008. 6. Frayn KN. Calculation of substrate oxidation rates in vivo from gaseous exchange. J Appl Physiol 55: 628-634, 1983. 7. Hargreaves M, Costill DL, Coggan A, Fink WJ, and Nishibata I. Effect of carbohydrate feedings on muscle glycogen utilization and exercise performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 16: 219-222, 1984.
8. Horowitz JF, Mora-Rodriguez R, Byerley LO, and Coyle EF. Lipolytic suppression following carbohydrate ingestion limits fat oxidation during exercise. Am J Physiol 273: E768-775, 1997. 9. Hulston CJ, Venables MC, Mann CH, Martin C, Philp A, Baar K, and Jeukendrup AE. Training with Low Muscle Glycogen Enhances Fat Metabolism in Well-Trained Cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2010. 10. Jentjens RL, Moseley L, Waring RH, Harding LK, and Jeukendrup AE. Oxidation of combined ingestion of glucose and fructose during exercise. J Appl Physiol 96: 1277-1284, 2004. 11. Jentjens RL, Underwood K, Achten J, Currell K, Mann CH, and Jeukendrup AE. Exogenous carbohydrate oxidation rates are elevated after combined ingestion of glucose and fructose during exercise in the heat. J Appl Physiol 100: 807-816, 2006. 12. Jeukendrup A, Brouns F, Wagenmakers AJ, and Saris WH. Carbohydrateelectrolyte feedings improve 1 h time trial cycling performance. Int J Sports Med 18: 125-129, 1997. 13. Jeukendrup AE. Carbohydrate intake during exercise and performance. Nutrition 20: 669-677, 2004. 14. Jeukendrup AE, Moseley L, Mainwaring GI, Samuels S, Perry S, and Mann CH. Exogenous carbohydrate oxidation during ultraendurance exercise. J Appl Physiol 100: 1134-1141, 2006. 15. Rowlands DS, Wallis GA, Shaw C, Jentjens RL, and Jeukendrup AE. Glucose polymer molecular weight does not affect exogenous carbohydrate oxidation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37: 1510-1516, 2005. 16. Wagenmakers AJ, Brouns F, Saris WH, and Halliday D. Oxidation rates of orally ingested carbohydrates during prolonged exercise in men. J Appl Physiol 75: 2774-2780, 1993. 17. Wallis GA, Rowlands DS, Shaw C, Jentjens RL, and Jeukendrup AE. Oxidation of combined ingestion of maltodextrins and fructose during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37: 426-432, 2005.
18. Whipp BJ, Ward SA, and Wasserman K. Respiratory markers of the anaerobic threshold. Adv Cardiol 35: 47-64, 1986. 19. Yeo WK, Paton CD, Garnham AP, Burke LM, Carey AL, and Hawley JA. Skeletal muscle adaptation and performance responses to once a day versus twice every second day endurance training regimens. J Appl Physiol 105: 1462-1470, 2008.