The definition of peritoneal dialysis (PD) adequacy has

Similar documents
Ana Paula Bernardo. CHP Hospital de Santo António ICBAS/ Universidade do Porto

Objectives. Peritoneal Dialysis vs. Hemodialysis 02/27/2018. Peritoneal Dialysis Prescription and Adequacy Monitoring

Chapter 2 Peritoneal Equilibration Testing and Application

Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: What, Who, Why, and How? Review and Case Study

The peritoneal equilibration test (PET) was developed THE SHORT PET IN PEDIATRICS. Bradley A. Warady and Janelle Jennings

3/21/2017. Solute Clearance and Adequacy Targets in Peritoneal Dialysis. Peritoneal Membrane. Peritoneal Membrane

PART FOUR. Metabolism and Nutrition

Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis, Vol. 23, 2007

Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy: Not Just Small- Solute Clearance

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Mode of dialysis at initiation GUIDELINES

ad e quate adjective \ˈa-di-kwət\

Hyperphosphatemia is a strong predictor of overall

PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PRESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT GUIDE

Early Estimation of High Peritoneal Permeability Can Predict Poor Prognosis for Technique Survival in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

Phosphate Clearance in Peritoneal Dialysis: Automated PD Compared with Continuous Ambulatory PD

Advances in Peritoneal Dialysis, Vol. 29, 2013

PART ONE. Peritoneal Kinetics and Anatomy

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Monitoring patients on peritoneal dialysis GUIDELINES

PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PRESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE

The Physiology of Peritoneal Dialysis As Related To Drug Removal

Adequacy of automated peritoneal dialysis with and without manual daytime exchange: A randomized controlled trial

Evaluation and management of nutrition in children

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment. Serum phosphate GUIDELINES

BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM in the PD PATIENT

Smart APD prescription. Prof. Wai Kei Lo Tung Wah Hospital The University of Hong Kong

Maintaining Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy: The Process of Incremental Prescription

Strategies to Preserve the Peritoneal Membrane. Reusz GS Ist Dept of Pediatrics Semmelweis University, Budapest

Drug Use in Dialysis

02/21/2017. Assessment of the Peritoneal Membrane: Practice Workshop. Objectives. Review of Physiology. Marina Villano, MSN, RN, CNN

Calcium x phosphate product

PD prescribing for all. QUESTION: Which approach? One size fits all or haute couture? (1) or (2)? The patient 18/03/2014.

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Level of renal function at which to initiate dialysis GUIDELINES

You can sleep while I dialyze

What is a PET? Although there are many types of pets, we will be discussing the Peritoneal Equilibration Test

Acid-base profile in patients on PD

Volume Management 2/25/2017. Disclosures statement: Objectives. To discuss evaluation of hypervolemia in peritoneal dialysis patients

PERITONEAL EQUILIBRATION TEST. AR. Merrikhi. MD. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Peritoneal Dialysis Prescriptions: A Primer for Nurses

Title:Hyperphosphatemia as an Independent Risk Factor of Coronary Artery Calcification Progression in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

THE HEMODIALYSIS PRESCRIPTION: TREATMENT ADEQUACY GERALD SCHULMAN MD VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL SCHOOL NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE

Guidelines by an ad hoc European committee on adequacy of the paediatric peritoneal dialysis prescription

2016 Annual Dialysis Conference Michelle Hofmann RN, BSN, CNN Renal Clinical Educator - Home

LLL Session - Nutritional support in renal disease

The greatest benefit of peritoneal dialysis (PD) is the

PD In Acute Kidney Injury. February 7 th -9 th, 2013

Control of hyperphosphatemia is a major goal in patients

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Peritoneal transport and ultrafiltration GUIDELINES

Gambrosol Trio, clinical studies 91 Glitazone, malnutrition-inflammationatherosclerosis

Predictors of Patient Survival in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis 10-Year Experience in 2 Major Centers in Tehran

Brief communication (Original)

Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: Where are we now?

Original Article ABSTRACT

The impact of improved phosphorus control: use of sevelamer hydrochloride in patients with chronic renal failure

PERITONEAL DIALYSIS ADEQUACY: The KDOQI Guidelines and Beyond

Dialysis Adequacy (HD) Guidelines

Free water transport: Clinical implications. Sodium sieving during short very hypertonic dialysis exchanges

Effect of Kt/V on survival and clinical outcome in CAPD patients in a randomized prospective study

PART FOUR. Metabolism and Nutrition

The Effect of Residual Renal Function at the Initiation of Dialysis on Patient Survival

Original epidemiologic studies 1 have suggested that approximately

Acid base homeostasis with the high convective dialysis treatments

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Optimising small solute clearances in peritoneal dialysis GUIDELINES

Vascular calcification in stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease patients on dialysis

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Hyperphosphatemia is emerging as an independent

Improvement in Pittsburgh Symptom Score Index After Initiation of Peritoneal Dialysis

Phosphate Management Guideline for Patients Receiving Extended Duration Hemodialysis

Tidal peritoneal dialysis: Comparison of different tidal regimens and automated peritoneal dialysis

Superior dialytic clearance of b 2 -microglobulin and p-cresol by high-flux hemodialysis as compared to peritoneal dialysis

When to start dialysis?

HEALTHYSTART TRAINING MANUAL. Living well with Kidney Disease

PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CLINICAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES DATA COLLECTION FORM 2006

Selection of modalities, prescription, and technical issues in children on peritoneal dialysis

THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS TO PRESERVE RESIDUAL KIDNEY FUNCTION. Rajnish Mehrotra Harborview Medical Center University of Washington, Seattle

Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol. 16, pp /96$300+00

How to evaluate the peritoneal membrane?

The control of extracellular fluid volume (ECFV) is a

I. CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR PERITONEAL DIALYSIS ADEQUACY

Methods. Original Article. Abstract


NATIONAL QUALITY FORUM Renal EM Submitted Measures

Chapter IV. The USRDS Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study (Wave 2) USRDS 1997 Annual Data Report USRDS Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality (Wave 2)

Intermittent peritoneal dialysis (IPD) has occasionally

All patients suitable for home dialysis should do PD first

Predictive Factors for Withdrawal from Peritoneal Dialysis: A Retrospective Cohort Study at Two Centers in Japan

From Peritoneal Dialysis to Hemodialysis How could we improve the transition? Th Lobbedez CHU de Caen Self Dialysis Meeting 22 May 2014

ISPD Asian Chapter Newsletter International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD)

Peritoneal transport testing

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australasians with Renal Impairment. Biochemical Targets. Calcium GUIDELINES

Home Dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis. Home Hemodialysis

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 22 July 2009

Proceedings of the ISPD 2006 The 11th Congress of the ISPD /07 $ MAXIMIZING THE SUCCESS OF PERITONEAL DIALYSIS IN HIGH TRANSPORTERS

Evidence Table. Study Type: Randomized controlled trial. Study Aim: To compare frequent nocturnal hemodialysis and conventional in-center dialysis.

HYDROCHLORIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SECONDARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM IN PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE ON MAINTENANCE DIALYSIS THERAPY

Physiology of Blood Purification: Dialysis & Apheresis. Outline. Solute Removal Mechanisms in RRT

Early Initiation of Dialysis Fails to Prolong Survival in Patients with End-Stage Renal Failure

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, home hemodialysis outcomes 131

Choices. Patient Education. Making the treatment decision. Overview. How do you define quality of life?

Bacterial peritonitis is a common complication of peritoneal

Time trends in initiation and dose of dialysis in end-stage renal disease patients in The Netherlands

Transcription:

Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol. 29, pp. 465 471 Printed in Canada. All rights reserved. 0896-8608/09 $3.00 +.00 Copyright 2009 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis DIALYTIC PHOSPHATE REMOVAL: A MODIFIABLE MEASURE OF DIALYSIS EFFICACY IN AUTOMATED PERITONEAL DIALYSIS Claus P. Schmitt, 1a Dagmara Borzych, 1,2a Barbara Nau, 1 Elke Wühl, 1 Aleksandra Zurowska, 2 and Franz Schaefer 1 Division of Pediatric Nephrology, 1 Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Pediatric Nephrology, 2 Medical University of Gdansk, Poland Background: Although hyperphosphatemia is one of the few established risk factors for cardiovascular mortality in patients on dialysis, the relationship between peritoneal dialysis (PD) prescription and dialytic phosphate removal is largely unexplored. Methods and Patients: We analyzed 24-hour clearances (n = 60) together with peritoneal equilibration tests (PETs) (n = 52) performed in children and adolescents (n = 35) on automated PD. Results: Dialytic phosphate clearance was more closely correlated with 2-hour and 4-hour dialysate-to-plasma ratio (D/P) of phosphate in the PETs (r = 0.44 and r = 0.52, both p < 0.0001) than with 2-hour and 4-hour D/P creatinine (r = 0.26 and r = 0.27, both p < 0.05). Dialytic 24-hour phosphate clearance was independently predicted by total fluid turnover (partial R 2 = 0.48, p < 0.001), the number of cycles (r = 0.52, p < 0.001), 2-hour D/P phosphate (partial R 2 = 0.07, p = 0.001), dwell time (partial R 2 = 0.05, p = 0.01), and achieved ultrafiltration (partial R 2 = 0.05, p = 0.005). 4-hour D/P phosphate and 24-hour phosphate clearance were significantly lower in hyperphosphatemic children (3.38 ± 1.17 vs 4.56 ± 1.99 L/1.73 m 2 /day, p < 0.05), whereas creatinine equilibration and clearance rates were not distinctive. Conclusion: Dialytic phosphate removal is an important modifiable determinant of phosphate control in automated PD. It strongly depends on total dialysate turnover and the prescribed number of cycles and is more adequately predicted by phosphate than by creatinine equilibration characteristics. Due to the deleterious effects of hyperphosphatemia, dialytic phosphate removal should be monitored routinely. Perit Dial Int 2009; 29:465 471 a www.pdiconnect.com These authors contributed equally to this study. KEY WORDS: Phosphate clearance; peritoneal transport; adequacy; children. The definition of peritoneal dialysis (PD) adequacy has long been a matter of controversy. Extending the urea kinetic modeling approach of hemodialysis, small-molecule clearances were originally considered useful prognostically relevant indices of PD dose. Observational studies such as the CANUSA trial suggested a linear relationship between urea and creatinine clearance and patient mortality and morbidity (1), and resulted in the formulation of adequacy guidelines defining dialysis adequacy by certain minimum urea and creatinine clearances (2). However, subsequent interventional trials demonstrated that modification of dialytic smallmolecule removal does not affect patient survival or morbidity (3,4). Hence, the search for a prognostically useful marker of dialysis adequacy continues. Hyperphosphatemia has been identified as a significant risk marker of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in adult dialysis patients (5 10). Mechanistically, the link between hyperphosphatemia and mortality has been attributed to disseminated vascular calcifications in patients on chronic dialysis. Calcifying large-vessel arteriopathy develops even in young patients with childhood-onset end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and is associated with the prevailing calcium phosphorus ion product (11,12). These findings raise the issue of whether dialytic phosphate removal might provide a more relevant direct measure of dialysis efficacy and adequacy than urea and creatinine clearance. In contrast to the large body of research available on the peritoneal transport kinetics and daily dialytic clearance of urea and creatinine, surprisingly little is known about the capacity to remove phosphate via the peritoneal membrane, although its importance is apparent and has been emphasized (13,14). Previous studies suggest that phosphate removal can be improved by modification of the dwell time (15,16); however, a detailed analysis of the Correspondence to: F. Schaefer, Division of Pediatric Nephrology, University Children s Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 151, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. franz.schaefer@med.uni-heidelberg.de Received 5 May 2008; accepted 12 September 2008. 465

SCHMITT et al. JULY 2009 VOL. 29, NO. 4 PDI variability of peritoneal phosphate transport and the modifiability of dialytic phosphate removal by PD prescription has not yet been performed. In particular, it is unclear how the various dosing options available with automated PD (APD) affect daily phosphorus removal. In this work, peritoneal phosphorus kinetics and daily dialytic and renal phosphorus elimination in children receiving APD were studied. METHODS Retrospective data were collected from 35 pediatric patients receiving chronic APD for ESRD due to congenital malformations of the kidney and urinary tract (n = 14), hemolytic-uremic syndrome (n = 6), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (n = 3), diffuse mesangial sclerosis (n = 3), IgA nephropathy (n = 2), congenital nephritic syndrome (n = 2), autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (n = 2), perinatal asphyxia (n = 2), and cystinosis (n = 1). Patients ranged in age from 3 months to 17 (median 10.2) years; 9 children were below 2 years of age. Median duration of dialysis at the time of study was 12 (1 44) months. Children performed APD without [nocturnal intermittent PD (NIPD); n = 33] or with [continuous cycling PD (CCPD); n = 27] an additional daytime dwell. Conventional PD fluid (Fresenius CAPD; Fresenius, Bad Homburg, Germany) was used on 38, and double-chamber PD solution on 22 occasions (13 times BicaVera and 9 times Balance; Fresenius). Dialysis efficacy was assessed by dialysate and residual renal clearance measurements. Twenty-six children had one clearance assessment and 17 had a second measurement 13.8 (5 40) months later, resulting in a total of 60 assessments. Thirty of the 35 patients had significant residual renal function; complete clearance studies (i.e., peritoneal and renal) were available from 44 occasions. Total clearances were calculated as the sum of dialytic and renal clearances. For the determination of the clearances of phosphate, creatinine, and glucose, a blood sample was taken and the total amounts of urine and peritoneal drainage were collected, weighed, and sampled during a 24-hour period. Clearances were calculated from plasma and dialysate/urine concentrations and the respective volumes and time intervals, and normalized to body surface area and 24 hours. Blood and dialysate glucose, creatinine, and phosphate were measured according to standard laboratory methods. Dialysate creatinine measurements were corrected for the presence of glucose as described previously (17). Fifty-two peritoneal equilibration test (PET) studies (including 17 repeated tests) were performed using 2.3% 466 glucose solution with a standardized fill volume of 1000 ml/m 2 according to a pediatric protocol (13). Dialysate-to-plasma ratios (D/P) and D/D 0 ratios of creatinine and phosphate were calculated for each patient at each time point. Serum phosphate levels were classified as low or high based on age-dependent limits according to the K/DOQI guidelines (18). Results are given as mean and median values, SDs, and ranges. Differences between two groups were evaluated using Student s t-test or Mann Whitney U test and correlations were tested using Spearman rank correlation and stepwise multiple regression analysis. RESULTS PERITONEAL MEMBRANE TRANSPORT CHARACTERISTICS In the PET studies, mean 2-hour and 4-hour D/P ratios were 0.44 ± 0.14 and 0.62 ± 0.14 for creatinine and 0.39 ± 0.12 and 0.55 ± 0.14 for phosphate respectively (p < 0.05 for 2 and 4 hours). A close correlation between the 2-hour and the 4-hour D/P ratios was observed for both phosphate (r = 0.83, p < 0.0001) and creatinine (r = 0.87, p < 0.0001). Also, both the 2-hour and the 4-hour D/P phosphate ratios were significantly correlated with those of creatinine (Figure 1). PERITONEAL DIALYSIS DOSE The parameters of APD prescription and the clearances achieved are summarized in Table 1. The number of nighttime PD cycles ranged from 3 to 13, dwell times from 45 to 180 minutes, and fill volumes from 625 to 1106 ml/m 2 at night and from 0 to 882 ml/m 2 during the day. The Figure 1 Relationship between creatinine and phosphate equilibration rates. D2/P = dialysate-to-plasma ratio at 2 hours; D4/P = dialysate-to-plasma ratio at 4 hours.

PDI JULY 2009 VOL. 29, NO. 4 DIALYTIC PHOSPHATE REMOVAL IN APD TABLE 1 Automated Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Modalities and Achieved Dialytic Phosphate and Creatinine Clearances All patients NIPD CCPD p Value Clearance studies (n) 60 33 27 NS Nighttime cycles (n) 6.0±2.1 6.4±2.4 5.5±1.4 NS Cycle dwell time (minutes) 94±31 93±33 96±28 NS Total cycler time (hours) 8.85±1.66 9.9±1.65 9.0±1.13 <0.05 Nighttime fill volume (ml/m 2 ) 996±109 992±87 1003±132 NS Daytime fill volume (ml/m 2 ) 0 540±220 Net ultrafiltration (ml/m 2 /day) 496±333 489±334 524±351 NS Nighttime dialysate turnover (L/m 2 /day) 5.93±1.92 6.28±2.22 5.49±1.37 NS Total dialysate turnover (L/m 2 /day) 6.17±1.89 6.28±2.22 6.03±1.40 NS Dialytic phosphate clearance (L/1.73 m 2 /week) 28.42±12.79 30.44±14.45 27.00±9.05 NS Dialytic creatinine clearance (L/1.73 m 2 /week) 29.23±15.27 30.74±16.37 29.66±12.25 NS Renal phosphate clearance (L/1.73 m 2 /week) 26.33±24.48 27.64±29.52 26.28±19.04 NS Renal creatinine clearance (L/1.73 m 2 /week) 43.01±37.70 49.40±44.44 38.80±32.94 NS Total phosphate clearance (L/1.73 m 2 /week) 55.96±24.23 59.82±28.15 52.28±19.75 NS Total creatinine clearance (L/1.73 m 2 /week) 67.19±36.92 66.37±41.02 67.13±34.86 NS NIPD = nocturnal intermittent PD; CCPD = continuous cycling PD; NS = not significant. 30 of the 35 patients had significant residual renal function. Complete clearance studies (i.e., peritoneal and renal) were available for 44 occasions. additional daytime dwell in the CCPD patients was offset by slightly shorter cycler dialysis with fewer automated cycles, resulting in similar total dialysate fluid turnover and 24-hour phosphate and creatinine clearances in the two groups. In the 9 children below the age of 2 years, dialytic phosphate clearance was 29.8 ± 11.1 and in the older children 28.6 ± 12.8 L/1.73 m 2 /week (p = NS); mean fill volume was 944 ± 127 and 1011 ± 99 ml/m 2 respectively (p = NS). Phosphate clearance did not differ in patients with conventional and bicarbonate- or lactatebased double-chamber solutions. FACTORS AFFECTING PHOSPHATE CLEARANCE Dialytic phosphate clearance was more closely correlated with 2-hour and 4-hour D/P phosphate in the PET (r = 0.44, r = 0.52; both p < 0.0001) than with 2-hour and 4-hour D/P creatinine (r = 0.26, p = 0.045 and r = 0.27, p = 0.036; Figure 2). Dialytic phosphate clearance was positively correlated with total (r = 0.53, p < 0.0001; Figure 3) and nighttime fluid turnover (r = 0.5, p < 0.0001), the number of cycles (r = 0.52, p < 0.001), total cycler time (r = 0.33, p < 0.01), and net ultrafiltration (r = 0.30, p < 0.05), and negatively with dwell time (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) but not with age. Patients with high dialysate volume had more exchanges (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001) and a longer daily dialysis time (r = 0.28, p < 0.05). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify those variables among the univariate Figure 2 Association between dialytic phosphate clearance and dialysate-to-plasma ratios (D/P) of creatinine and phosphate. correlates listed above that independently affected dialytic phosphate clearance. Four variables that explained 65% of the overall variability of dialytic 24-hour phosphate clearance were retained in the model: total fluid turnover (partial R 2 = 0.48, p < 0.001), 2-hour D/P phosphate (partial R 2 = 0.07, p = 0.001), dwell time (partial R 2 = 0.05, p = 0.01), and total net ultrafiltration (partial R 2 = 0.05, p = 0.005). When individual prescription characteristics were considered, dialytic phosphate clearance was positively affected by the number of nighttime exchanges (partial R 2 = 0.48, p < 0.001) and 467

SCHMITT et al. JULY 2009 VOL. 29, NO. 4 PDI oral phosphate binders less frequently than the hyperphosphatemic patients. Whereas renal phosphate removal did not differ between the groups, the hyperphosphatemic children had significantly lower 24-hour dialytic phosphate clearances than the normophosphatemic patients (p < 0.05). In contrast, neither D/P creatinine nor dialytic creatinine clearance differed between normo- and hyperphosphatemic children. Low phosphate transport did not correlate with age or duration of dialysis. DISCUSSION Figure 3 Total fluid turnover and dialytic phosphate clearance in 60 children on automated peritoneal dialysis. net ultrafiltration (partial R 2 = 0.08, p = 0.005), with an additional negative impact of dwell time (partial R 2 = 0.06, p = 0.001). Children with longer dwell time had fewer exchanges and less total fluid turnover. Age did not independently affect dialytic phosphate clearance or serum phosphate levels. EFFECT OF DIALYTIC PHOSPHATE REMOVAL ON SERUM PHOSPHATE LEVELS To account for the age dependency of serum phosphorus levels, the patients with both PET and clearance studies available were divided into normophosphatemic (n = 30) and hyperphosphatemic subgroups (n = 22; Table 2). Normophosphatemic children were younger and received Dialytic phosphate clearance is the product of nonmodifiable peritoneal transport characteristics and the modifiable components of dialysis prescription. Our study demonstrates that, in children treated with APD, both intrinsic peritoneal phosphate transport characteristics and PD dosing have a significant impact on daily phosphate removal. Creatinine is an inadequate surrogate marker of phosphate transport and cannot replace direct measurements of peritoneal phosphate handling. Creatinine and glucose were used as markers to describe small-molecule transport across the peritoneal membrane in the original description of the PET, and creatinine and urea clearances have been utilized for a long time as indices of dialysis adequacy. While the validity of these markers has been questioned increasingly in recent years (3), it has become obvious that phosphate is both an important marker and a mediator of morbidity and mortality in ESRD (5,6). In the present study, we measured phosphate equilibration during standardized pediatric PETs, assessed the relationship TABLE 2 Clinical, Biochemical, and Dialytic Characteristics in Normophosphatemic Children (Thirty Occasions) Compared to Children with Elevated Serum Phosphate Levels for Age (Twenty-Two Occasions) 468 Hyperphosphatemic Normophosphatemic p Value Age (years) 12.1±4.8 6.26±4.9 <0.001 Time on PD (months) 9.7±12.2 12.3±11.6 NS Patients receiving oral phosphate binders 18/22 (82%) 13/30 (43%) <0.05 Serum phosphate (mmol/l) 1.89±0.32 1.44±0.24 <0.001 Serum Ca P ion product (mmol 2 /L 2 ) 4.3±0.7 3.5±0.8 <0.001 Renal phosphate clearance (L/1.73 m 2 /week) 27.35±24.92 23.87±24.57 NS 2-hour D/P creatinine 0.39±0.12 0.45±0.14 NS 4-hour D/P creatinine 0.57±0.13 0.65±0.15 NS Dialytic creatinine clearance (L/1.73 m 2 /week) 26.89±8.90 31.28±16.05 NS 2-hour D/P phosphate 0.37±0.11 0.40±0.12 NS 4-hour D/P phosphate 0.51±0.14 0.60±0.16 <0.05 Dialytic phosphate clearance (L/1.73 m 2 /week) 23.78±8.00 31.38±11.60 <0.05 PD = peritoneal dialysis; Ca P = calcium phosphate product; D/P = dialysate-to-plasma ratio; NS = not significant.

PDI JULY 2009 VOL. 29, NO. 4 DIALYTIC PHOSPHATE REMOVAL IN APD between phosphate and creatinine equilibration, and analyzed the predictive value of D/P phosphate for daily phosphate removal and serum phosphate levels in children receiving APD. We noted that, while the equilibration characteristics of creatinine and phosphate were significantly correlated, D/P phosphate was a better predictor of 24-hour phosphate clearance than was D/P creatinine. The mechanisms of phosphate transport across the peritoneal membrane have received little attention to date. Kinetic modeling in a small number of diabetic patients suggested that diffusion is the major physical principle of phosphate elimination, with some additional impact by non-lymphatic convective transport but no appreciable lymphatic transport (19). As charged ions, phosphate molecules are subject to facilitated diffusion along the electrochemical gradient between plasma and dialysate in addition to size-restricted diffusive transport. Another level of complexity is added by the fact that some 20% of circulating phosphate ions are bound to plasma proteins. Finally, several families of transmembranous phosphate transporters have been discovered in recent years (20), providing a mechanistic basis for transcellular phosphate transport across endothelial cells. In addition, phosphate ions can reversibly shift into erythrocytes, depending on the prevailing electrophysiological milieu (21). These differences in biophysical handling at the peritoneal membrane readily explain the marked heterogeneity of phosphate and creatinine equilibration ratios observed in the PET. As a consequence of these differential transport kinetics, the peritoneal transporter state defined by the creatinine equilibration pattern is poorly predictive of daily phosphate clearances. This becomes particularly evident in patients undergoing APD, where dialysate is drained well before full equilibration is achieved. Our findings clearly indicate that direct measurement of D/P phosphate in the PET is a better indicator of the phosphate clearance achieved with a given PD prescription than D/P creatinine. According to our results and in analogy to the usual definition of transport categories, patients with a D/P phosphate less than 0.27 after 2 hours or 0.41 after 4 hours could be considered low phosphate transporters (i.e., D/P < 1 SD below the mean). Of note, close correlations between 2- and 4-hour ratios have already been reported for glucose and creatinine (22) and suggest that sufficient accuracy for the assessment of peritoneal membrane transport capacity can be achieved with a shortened PET. In addition to the effect of peritoneal transport characteristics, dialytic clearance in APD is a function of the number, volume, and duration of dialysis cycles. Total PD fluid turnover is the major determinant of phosphate clearance. Stepwise linear regression analysis suggested approximately 50% of the variance would be explained by fluid turnover and 10% by the individual membrane characteristics as reflected by D/P phosphate in the PET. At a given D/P phosphate, dialytic phosphate clearance increased by 0.7 L/1.73 m 2 /day with every 1 L/m 2 prescribed PD fluid turnover. In a child with a serum phosphate of 6 mg/dl, this translates into 4.2 mg/1.73 m 2 phosphate removal per day, or 29.5 mg (9.5 mmol) per week, the average amount removed by one APD session (23). These results are in keeping with studies in adults, where 8 and 8.8 mmol phosphate removal per 1 L dialysate volume were reported (24,25). When the individual prescription variables were analyzed in the stepwise prediction model, the number of cycles performed was the strongest independent predictor of phosphate clearance, with smaller contributions by cycle duration, D/P phosphate, and net ultrafiltration, the latter likely reflecting the additional impact of convective phosphate transport. These four parameters explained up to 65% of the variability of dialytic phosphate clearance. The age of the patients was not predictive. Peritoneal phosphate transport did not differ with acid or ph-neutral, lactate- or bicarbonate-buffered double-chamber solutions. Impact of ph on cellular phosphate balance (26) and acute phosphate removal with hemodialysis (27) and PD (28) has been demonstrated. These subtle differences, however, could not be reconfirmed in extended clinical trials (29). An impact of the initial ph of the PD solutions on dialysate phosphate determination is also unlikely. Mean dwell time was 95 ± 30 minutes in our patients; even with acidic PD solution (ph 5.5), effluent ph increased to ph 7.2 within only 60 minutes of dwell time (28). Fill volume did not exert an independent effect, probably due to the minor variation of dwell volumes in the given setting of routine APD prescriptions with a standardized target of 1000 ml/m 2. Daytime fill volumes, averaging 430 ml/m 2 in those patients following a wet day prescription, also did not impact significantly on 24-hour dialytic phosphate clearance. The efficacy of single long daytime dwells of conventional dextrose PD fluid may be compromised by their partial resorption and the limited intra-abdominal volumes tolerated by children during the daytime. Moreover, patients with a daytime dwell tended to have shorter cycler sessions, which may level off effects of the daytime dwell. It would be interesting to study whether a more marked effect on dialytic phosphate clearance might be achieved using icodextrin daytime dwells when added to an unchanged NIPD prescription. 469

SCHMITT et al. JULY 2009 VOL. 29, NO. 4 PDI A subgroup of 17 of the 35 patients had a second determination 13.8 ± 10.2 months later, which harbors the danger of overestimation of individual patients. Similar findings, however, were obtained when these repeat determinations were excluded from the analysis, thus ruling out a respective bias. The second issue addressed in this study concerned possible association between dialytic phosphate removal and serum phosphate levels. Since the normal range of serum phosphate is strongly age dependent, reaching up to 2.7 mmol/l in healthy infants, patients were categorized as normo- or hyperphosphatemic and the groups were compared with respect to their clinical and dialysis-related characteristics. Hyperphosphatemic children were, on average, older than normophosphatemic subjects, reflecting the better control of phosphate intake in tube and formula fed infants in contrast to the variable nutritional compliance observed in adolescents. Individual growth rate may also have influenced net phosphate balance. Whereas residual renal phosphate clearance, albeit considerable, showed no relationship with serum phosphate levels, the daily dialytic phosphate clearance was 33% higher in normophosphatemic than in hyperphosphatemic children. In contrast, creatinine clearance and creatinine D/P ratios were not distinctive. This is different from findings in adult PD patients (30) and provides a strong rationale for direct monitoring of peritoneal phosphate elimination. We conclude that dialytic phosphate elimination can be modified in APD by the number of PD cycles, dwell time, and total dialysate turnover. Dialytic phosphate clearance represents an important contribution to serum phosphate control. Since hyperphosphatemia is a major cardiovascular risk factor in uremia, dialytic phosphate removal should be monitored routinely. Adequacy studies defining the impact on patient outcome are mandatory. DISCLOSURE No financial support or benefits have been received by the authors from any commercial source related directly or indirectly to the scientific work reported in this article. REFERENCES 1. Churchill DN, Taylor DW, Keshaviah PK, Thorpe KE, Beecroft ML, Kailash KK, et al. Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis; association with clinical outcome. CANUSA study. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7:198 207. 2. NKF-K/DOQI. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy, New York, National Kidney Foundation 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 6(Suppl 1):65 136. 3. Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E, Correa-Rotter R, Ramos A, Moran J, et al. Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13:1307 20. 4. Lo WK, Ho YW, Li CS, Wong KS, Chan TM, Yu AW, et al. Effect of Kt/V on survival and clinical outcome in CAPD patients in a prospective, randomized trial. Kidney Int 2003; 64:649 56. 5. Chertow GM. Slowing the progression of vascular calcification in hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14(9 Suppl 4):S310 14. 6. Block GA, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Lewin NW, Port FK. Association of serum phosphorus and calcium x phosphate product with mortality risk in chronic hemodialysis patients: a national study. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 31:607 17. 7. Ganesh SK, Stack AG, Lewin NW, Hulbert-Shearon T, Port FK. Association of elevated serum PO(4), Ca x PO(4) product, and parathyroid hormone with cardiac mortality risk in chronic hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12:2131 8. 8. Stevens LA, Djurdiew O, Cardew S, Cameron EC, Levin A. Phosphate and parathyroid hormone levels in combination and as a function of dialysis duration predict mortality: evidence for the complexity of the association between mineral metabolism and outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004; 15:770 9. 9. Noordzij M, Korevaar JC, Bos WJ, Boeschoten EW, Dekker FW, Bossuyt PM, et al. Mineral metabolism and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk: peritoneal dialysis patients compared with haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21:2513 20. 10. Melamed ML, Eustace JA, Plantinga L, Jaar BG, Fink NE, Coresh J, et al. Changes in serum calcium, phosphate, and PTH and the risk of death in incident dialysis patients: a longitudinal study. Kidney Int 2006; 70:351 7. 11. Oh J, Wunsch R, Turzer M, Bahner M, Raggi P, Querfeld U, et al. Advanced coronary and carotid arteriopathy in young adults with childhood-onset chronic renal failure. Circulation 2002; 106:100 5. 12. Litwin M, Wühl E, Jourdan C, Trelewicz J, Niemirska A, Fahr K, et al. Altered morphologic properties of large arteries in children with chronic renal failure and after renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16:1494 500. 13. Fischbach M, Stefanidis CJ, Watson AR; European Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Working Group. Guidelines by an ad hoc European committee on adequacy of the pediatric peritoneal dialysis prescription. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17:380 5. 14. Fischbach M, Edefonti A, Schroeder C, Watson A; European Pediatric Dialysis Working Group. Hemodialysis in children: general practical guidelines. Pediatr Nephrol 2005; 20:1054 6. 15. Fischbach M, Lahlou A, Eyer D, Desprez P, Geisert J. De- 470

PDI JULY 2009 VOL. 29, NO. 4 DIALYTIC PHOSPHATE REMOVAL IN APD termination of individual ultrafiltration time (APEX) and purification phosphate time by peritoneal equilibration test: application to individual peritoneal dialysis modality prescription in children. Perit Dial Int 1996; 16(Suppl 1):S557 60. 16. Fischbach M, Desprez P, Terzic J, Lahlou A, Mengus L, Geisert J. Use of intraperitoneal pressure, ultrafiltration and purification dwell times for individual peritoneal dialysis prescription in children. Clin Nephrol 1996; 46: 14 16. 17. Schaefer F, Langenbeck D, Heckert HK, Scharer K, Mehls O. Evaluation of peritoneal solute transfer by peritoneal equilibration test in children. Adv Perit Dial 1992; 8:410 15. 18. NKF-K/DOQI. Clinical practice guidelines for bone metabolism and disease in children with chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 46(Suppl 1):S1 122. 19. Graff J, Fugleberg S, Brahm J, Fogh-Andersen N. The transport of phosphate between the plasma and dialysate compartments in peritoneal dialysis is influenced by an electronic potential difference. Clin Physiol 1996; 16: 291 300. 20. Virkki LV, Biber J, Murer H, Forster IC. Phosphate transporters: a tale of two solute carrier families. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2007; 293:F643 F654. 21. Shoemaker DG, Bender CA, Gunn RB. Sodium-phosphate cotransport in human red blood cells. Kinetics and role in membrane metabolism. J Gen Physiol 1988; 92:449 74. 22. Warady BA, Jennings J. The short PET in pediatrics. Perit Dial Int 2007; 27:441 5. 23. Salusky IB. A new era in phosphate binder therapy: what are the options? Kidney Int Suppl 2006; 105:S10 15. 24. Mesa P, Gropuzzo M, Cleva M, Boscutti G, Mioni G, Cruciatti A, et al. Behaviour of phosphate removal with different dialysis schedules. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13(Suppl 6):43 8. 25. Winchester JF, Quijda VE, Rotellar C. Phosphate control in peritoneal dialysis patients. In: La Greca, eds. Peritoneal Dialysis. Milan: Wichtig; 1991: 327 31. 26. Mostellar ME, Tuttle EP Jr. Effects of alkalosis on plasma concentration and urinary excretion of inorganic phosphate. J Clin Invest 1964; 43:138 49. 27. Fischbach M, Hamel G, Simeoni U. Phosphate dialytic removal: enhancement of phosphate cellular clearance by biofiltration (with acetate buffer dialysate). Nephron 1992; 62:155 60. 28. Schmitt CP, Harraldson B, Doetschmann R, Zimmering M, Greiner C, Boswald M, et al. Kidney Int 2002; 61:1527 36. 29. Haas S, Schmitt CP, Arbeiter K, Bonzel KE, Fischbach M, John U, et al. Improved acidosis correction and recovery of mesothelial cell mass with neutral-ph bicarbonate dialysis solution among children undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:2632 8. 30. Sedlacek M, Dimaano F, Uribarri J. Relationship between phosphorus and creatinine clearance in peritoneal dialysis: clinical implications. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36:1020 4. 471