How to get your work published. Tracy I. George and Szu-Hee Lee Co-Editors-in-Chief International Journal of Laboratory Hematology

Similar documents
Objectives. Why Bother Writing? Manuscript Preparation for Publication

Timing Your Research Career & Publishing Addiction Medicine

Tips on Successful Writing and Getting Published Rita F. Redberg, MD, MSc, FACC, FAHA Professor of Medicine Editor, JAMA Internal Medicine

WP-6 Planning Form - MLA Report

Insights. Originality The research should be relevant-in time and content.

Authors and Co-Authors,

Publication Ethics The Agony and Ecstasy. Publication Ethics The Road Ahead

Overlapping Publications. Hooman Momen, Editor Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Responsible Conduct of Research: Responsible Authorship. David M. Langenau, PhD, Associate Professor of Pathology Director, Molecular Pathology Unit

INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS

EFFECTIVE MEDICAL WRITING Michelle Biros, MS, MD Editor-in -Chief Academic Emergency Medicine

Dealing with Authors Misconduct:

Gail Dodge Old Dominion University

Introduction. Click here to access the following documents: 1. Application Supplement 2. Application Preview 3. Experiential Component

EVMS Authorship Guidelines

Scientific Ethics. Modified by Emmanuel and Collin from presentation of Doug Wallace Dalhousie University

Kent Academic Repository

plural noun 1. a system of moral principles: the ethics of a culture. 2. the rules of conduct recognized in respect to a particular group, culture,

Authorship Guidelines for CAES Faculty Collaborating with Students

Request for Proposals

Editorial. From the Editors: Perspectives on Turnaround Time

Responsible Authorship

Madhukar Pai, MD, PhD Associate Professor Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics McGill University, Montreal, Canada

CJSP: On Reaffirming a Canadian School Psychology

GMS 6091 Responsible Conduct in Research

ETHICS IN PUBLISHING OF PAPERS IN THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM "METROLOGY AND METROLOGY ASSURANCE"

How to Write a Scientific

Editorial misconduct in biomedical journals - the role of an Ombudsman

The challenge. Objectives 5/16/2013. Building your influence as a safety leader

COMMON ERRORS ON IMMUNIZATION FORMS

Clinical Practice Committee Statement Protocols (updated 2/22/2018) Henry Kim, MD FAAEM William Meurer, MD FAAEM. Steven Rosenbaum, MD FAAEM

SEMINAR ON SERVICE MARKETING

The EQUATOR Network: a global initiative to improve the quality of reporting research

Write a research proposal to rationalize the purpose of the research. (Consult PowerPoint slide show notes.)

National Association for Holistic Aromatherapy. Writer Guidelines and Article Submission Requirements

논문투고및투고후소통하기 : 영문교정작업, 실제논문투고하기, revision 답변달기, query form 작성하기

Como publicar en una revista científica del área de bilogía y química

Manuscript ID BMJ R1 entitled "Nosocomial Transmission of Avian Influenza A (H7N9) Virus in China: An Epidemiological Investigation"

The Cochrane Collaboration

THE ETHICS OF AUTHORSHIP

Dissemination experiences from CONSORT and other reporting guidelines

IJSPT INVITED COMMENTARY ABSTRACT

Living Well With Dementia in North Yorkshire. Summary

Principles of publishing

6 th grade science. Drops on a Penny. changed, but the scientist keeps them the same so that they will not interfere with the

Tips For Writing Referee Reports. Lance Cooper

Guidelines for reviewers

Reviewing Papers and Writing Referee Reports. (B. DeMarco, Lance Cooper, Tony Liss, Doug Beck) Why referees are needed

Outline. Bioethics in Research and Publication. What is ethics? Where do we learn ethics? 6/19/2015

FROM A QUESTION TO A PAPER

Clinical Aromatherapy Diploma Holistic Massage Diploma

Title: Exploring approaches to patient safety: The case of spinal manipulation therapy

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Proposed Standards for Standard Course of Study in American Sign Language (ASL) Secondary Level

Term Paper Step-by-Step

Yahya Zakaria Eid, Ph.D. Faculty of Agriculture,, Kafrelsheikh University

PUBLISH OR PERISH Writing and Publishing Scientific Manuscripts ICASA Shirin Heidari Mirjam Curno Papa Salif Sow

Title: Co-morbidities, complications and causes of death among people with femoral neck fracture - A three-year follow-up study.

Guideline for a Starters in Reviewing. a Journal for the J Neurogastroenterol Motil

EFSA PRE-SUBMISSION GUIDANCE FOR APPLICANTS INTENDING TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS FOR AUTHORISATION OF HEALTH CLAIMS MADE ON FOODS

CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE

5/8/2013. Recognize, Respond to and Prevent the Publication of Research Misconduct. Overview

Procedure for the Investigation of Misconduct (Staff) Approved: Version 1.1 (February 2016) Summary

September is Childhood Cancer Awareness Month. Advocacy Toolkit. cancer.chop.edu/cancerawareness

Blind Manuscript Submission to Reduce Rejection Bias?

The Clean Environment Commission. Public Participation in the Environmental Review Process

Peer review of a scientific manuscript. Hanan Hamamy

NFIL3/E4BP4 controls Type 2 T helper cell cytokine expression

Request for Proposals: Junior Investigators in Genetics and Human Agency Letters of Intent Due March 1, 2016

Advanced Trainee (AT) Contribution Trainees must be the main contributor to the project submitted. If a trainee has worked on a larger

RESEARCH PROTOCOL. December 23 nd, 2005 ITHA

THE LOGIC AND STRUCTURE OF RESEARCH PROPOSALS

Working with Patient and Family Advisors Webinar 1: Opportunities and Steps for Getting Started

Module 4: Technology: PsycINFO, APA Format and Critical Thinking

Manuscript Submission Guidelines

ed. tage Insights Publication strategy Elizabeth Wager PhD Publications Consultant Sideview Chair, COPE, on behalf of Editage Sideview "")

Patients To Learn From: On the Need for Systematic Integration of Research and Care in Academic Health Care

How to write and submit a research manuscript. Workshop 20 November 2013

Media Crisis Handbook

Elements of a Good Submission: Raising Your Chances of Acceptance. Amanda Hindle Senior Editor Edanz Group 22 March 2013

Lesson 1 Understanding Science

Four authorship criteria from the MSU Authorship Guidelines (

VARIED THRUSH MANUSCRIPT REVIEW HISTORY REVIEWS (ROUND 2) Editor Decision Letter

My Reflections on Publishing In Journal of Marketing

Academic Ethics. Sanjay Wategaonkar Department of Chemical Sciences. 8 th August 2016

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Avancemos Spanish correlated to the. NCSSFL ACTFL Can-Do Statements (2015), Novice Low, Novice Mid, and Novice High

Daniel T Lackland. Medical University of South Carolina

YOUR PERSONAL STATEMENT

How to Write a Case Report

Paediatric and Adolescent HIV Research Grant Programme

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Avancemos Spanish 1b correlated to the. NCSSFL ACTFL Can-Do Statements (2015), Novice Low, Novice Mid and Novice High

10 things OA publishers are talking about

MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION FOR THE DIABETES EDUCATOR

Author s response to reviews

AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CRIMINOLOGY CODE OF ETHICS (Approved March 2016)

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Avancemos Spanish 1a correlated to the. NCSSFL ACTFL Can-Do Statements (2015), Novice Low, Novice Mid and Novice High

OUTPATIENT SERVICES PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES CONTRACT

My personal story about writing an abstract for WCPT Congress Jonathan Quartey

Limited English Proficiency (LEP)

Book Review: The Role of Education in the Rational use of Medicines

Flagship Journal in Neurology

Transcription:

How to get your work published Tracy I. George and Szu-Hee Lee Co-Editors-in-Chief International Journal of Laboratory Hematology

Objectives Journal perspective Author perspective The manuscript Problems Authorship Conflicts of interest

What do journals want?

What do journals want? The journals want what their readers want.

What do readers want?

What do readers want? Important information with impact Novel information (new insights, cutting edge) Quality work Readers of different journals will want different things

What is the process for the journals?

What is the process for the journals? Expert Review Peers assess the value and quality of the manuscript Editorial teams assess the priority

Peer Review Public accountability and validity

What are the key elements of a paper?

What are the key elements of a paper? Raise awareness of interest in an article Background information Study approach and analysis Extract and distill the essentials for the readers

Author s Perspective: Key issues

Author s Perspective: Key issues Fast turnaround (competition) Appropriate format (article types) Wide dissemination (apps, website, open access)

Author s perspective 1. Prepare paper 2. Choose journal 3. Submission

The Manuscript Title Formal abstract Concise English used accurately Avoid jargon, slang, and too many abbreviations

Abstract More broadly published than the manuscript Tell the story with the minimum number of words Attract the reader Don t use a meeting abstract in the final paper without updating it

Introduction Summarize the current literature without being repetitive No plagiarism

Materials & Methods Enough detail so that any knowledgeable person in the field could repeat the experiments

Results Provide enough detail to highlight main findings of the manuscript Support with appropriate graphs, images, etc

Discussion Start with main findings Discuss importance of findings and how they relate to the state-of-the art information that you discussed in the introduction Conclude with a section on the significance of your work

Plagiarism the appropriation of ideas, data, or methods from others without adequate permission or acknowledgment Self plagiarization Scott-Lichter D and the Editorial Policy Committee, Council of Science Editors White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications 2009 Update. Reston (VA) 2009.

Plagiarism Most journals use software to assess similarity scores Plagiarism is unethical Avoid inadvertent plagiarism Paraphrase

Image manipulation No specific feature may be enhanced Enhancements must be applied across the image

How to Avoid Trouble Keep original files, not PPT or compressed JPEG formats

Choosing a journal

Choosing a journal Be realistic! What is the significance of your work? Novel? Descriptive or mechanistic findings? Does it fit with the scope of the journal? General or speciality journal? Consider pre-submission inquiries Impact factor is not the only facor

Planning & executing scientific work Anticipate criticisms Test alternatives Plan adequate controls

Manuscript submission Coverletter Concise Explain why you did this work and why it s important Authorship Negotiate ahead of time For many journals, authors are notified at the time of submission

Recommendations of Authorship Substantial contributions Conception or design of work Acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data Drafting work or revising it critically Approve final version of published article Accountable for all aspects of the work

Transparent Handle conflicts during the planning, implementation, writing, peer review, editing and publication of scientific work

After submission Rejection Accept if justified by reviewers comments Accept if based on editorial priorities Consider a rebuttal if the reviewers misunderstood Appeals Polite Unemotional Wait at least a week

After submission Invited Revision Respond to each comment Polite Point by point response May still get rejection after an invited revision

Acceptance! Carefully review galley proofs