Evaluation of Dynamic Intimal Flap Movement in Acute Stanford Type B Aortic Dissections (ATBD) and the Effects of Thoracic Endovascular Stent Grafting

Similar documents
Malperfusion Syndromes Type B Aortic Dissection with Malperfusion

The Petticoat Technique Managing Type B Dissection with both Early and Long Term Considerations

Animesh Rathore, MD 4/22/17. The Great Debate 45yo Man With Uncomplicated Acute TBAD: The Case For Medical Management

Vascular Intervention

UC SF Early Intervention in Type B Dissection: Results From the INSTEAD XL Trial. Acute Type B Dissection. Outline. Disclosures.

Management of Acute Aortic Syndromes. M. Grabenwoger, MD Dept. of Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital Hietzing, Vienna, Austria

Acute dissections of the descending thoracic aorta (Debakey

Open fenestration for complicated acute aortic B dissection

Do the Data Support Endovascular Therapy for Descending Thoracic AD? Woong Chol Kang, M.D.

UC SF. Disclosures. Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair 4/24/2009. Management of Acute Dissections: Is There Still a Role for Open Surgery?

No Disclosure. Aortic Dissection in Japan. This. The Challenge of Acute and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissections with Endovascular Aortic Repair

Combined Endovascular and Surgical Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Pathology: Hybrid TEVAR

Is there a way to predict the risk in uncomplicated Type B aortic dissections? FRANS MOLL University Medical Centre Utrecht - Netherlands

Neurological Complications of TEVAR. Frank J Criado, MD. Union Memorial-MedStar Health Baltimore, MD USA

Endovascular therapy for Ischemic versus Nonischemic complicated acute type B aortic dissection (catbad).

UC SF An Algorithm to Choose Which Uncomplicated (Asymptomatic) Acute Type B Dissection Patients Should Undergo TEVAR. Disclosures.

Challenges. 1. Sizing. 2. Proximal landing zone 3. Distal landing zone 4. Access vessels 5. Spinal cord ischemia 6. Endoleak

Morphological analysis of the thoracic aorta in case of TBAD without treatment.

Type B Dissection Sub-Categories

Aggressive Resection/Reconstruction of the Aortic Arch in Type A Dissection

Total endovascular techniques utilization in aortic dissection radical treatment

Risks for Retrograde Type-A Dissection After TEVAR

Acute non-complicated TBD Do need TEVAR treatment

What is the best treatment for False Lumen growth after type B Dissection

Development of a Branched LSA Endograft & Ascending Aorta Endograft

Asymptomatic Radiology / Clinical data Report / Cohort bias Referral bias. UCSF Vascular Symposium April 7-9, Acute Aortic Dissection

TEVAR for Chronic dissections: indications for TEVAR, long term results

Residual Dissection and False Lumen Aneurysm After TEVAR

Late False Lumen Expansion Predicted by Preoperative Blood Flow Simulation in a Patient with Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection

Aortic Center of Excellence at Sentara

Endovascular Management of Thoracic Aortic Pathology Stéphan Haulon, J Sobocinski, B Maurel, T Martin-Gonzalez, R Spear, A Hertault, R Azzaoui

Follow-up of Aortic Dissection: How, How Often, Which Consequences Euro Echo 2011

I-Hui Wu, M.D. Ph.D. Clinical Assistant Professor Cardiovascular Surgical Department National Taiwan University Hospital

Treatment of acute type B aortic dissection: Current status

Are stent-grafts for acute type B dissection durable? Est-ce que les stents graft pour la dissection aigue de type B sont efficaces à moyen terme?

CT angiography in type I acute aortic dissection complicated with malperfusion - a visual review of obstruciton patterns

Development of Stent Graft. Kato et al. Development of an expandable intra-aortic prothesis for experimental aortic dissection.

Acute Type B dissection. Closure of the infra diaphragmatic tear: how and when?

Intravascular Ultrasound in the Treatment of Complex Aortic Pathologies. Naixin Kang, M.D. Vascular Surgery Fellow April 26 th, 2018

Global Evidence for the Treatment of Type B Aortic Dissection

An Overview of Post-EVAR Endoleaks: Imaging Findings and Management. Ravi Shergill BSc Sean A. Kennedy MD Mark O. Baerlocher MD FRCPC

Dissection de type B: l étude Instead et corollaire stratégique

Clinical Trials of Acute and Chronic Dissections. Gregory Landry MD

Indications for stent grafts in type B aortic dissection

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) Indications and Basic Procedure

Optimal repair of acute aortic dissection

Endovascular Treatment of Malperfusion Syndrome

AORTIC DISSECTIONS Current Management. TOMAS D. MARTIN, MD, LAT Professor, TCV Surgery Director UF Health Aortic Disease Center University of Florida

Technique and Outcome of Laser Fenestration For Arch Vessels

Optimal Treatment of Chronic Dissection

ON FLOW DYNAMICS IN TYPE B AORTIC DISSECTION (TBAD)

Is a Paradigm Shift towards Early Endovascular Treatment of Type B Dissection justified?

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA)

The role of false lumen intervention to promote remodelling via induced thrombosis the FLIRT concept

Therapeutic Pathway In Acute Aortic Dissection. Speaker: Cesare Quarto Consultant Cardiac Surgeon Royal Brompton Hospital, London UK

IVUS Guided Case Review Case Performed by Frank R. Arko III, MD Charlotte, NC

TEVAR. (Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair) for Aneurysm and Dissection. Bruce Tjaden MD Vascular Surgery Fellow

How to achieve a successful proximal sealing in TEVAR? Pr L Canaud

Performance of the conformable GORE TAG device in Type B aortic dissection from the GORE GREAT real world registry

Challenges with Complex Anatomies Advancing Care in Endovascular Aortic Treatment

In recent years, the field of endovascular surgery has revolutionized

Home-made Fenestrations for Various Pathologies of Abdominal Aorta

Case Report 1. CTA head. (c) Tele3D Advantage, LLC

Update on Acute Aortic Syndrome

Early Clinical Results with the Valiant Mona LSA Branch Stent-Graft

Current treatment of Aortic Aneurysms and Dissections. Adam Keefer, MD, FACS Sean Hislop, MD, FACS

Indications for use. Contraindications within the United States

Pioneering EVAR techniques in aortic dissection

EVAR and TEVAR: Extending Their Use for Rupture and Traumatic Injury. Conflict of Interest. Hypotensive shock 5/5/2014. none

Abdominal and thoracic aneurysm repair

MedStar Health, Inc. POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL Policy Number: MP.103.MH Last Review Date: 11/08/2018 Effective Date: 02/01/2019

Thoracic Aortic Research Center. University of Milan

OPEN REOPERATIONS FOR COMPLICATIONS OF ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC PROCEDURES: TIP OF THE ICEBERG?

False Lumen Backflow In Chronic Aortic Dissections: What Is Its Role and How Can It Be Treated?

Total Endovascular Repair Type A Dissection. Eric Herget Interventional Radiology

TEVAR for complicated acute type B dissection with malperfusion

Description. Section: Surgery Effective Date: April 15, Subsection: Surgery Original Policy Date: December 6, 2012 Subject:

Understanding the Predictors of Aneurysmal Degeneration in Type B Dissection

Hybrid Repair of a Complex Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm

The conundrum about complicated and uncomplicated type B dissection New concepts?

La sindrome aortica acuta oggi

Deb Coghlan AMS (Vascular and General ) Brisbane, Australia

Redo treatment and open conversion after TEVAR

Reimbursement Guide Zenith Fenestrated AAA Endovascular Graft

Distribution of intimomedial tears in patients with type B aortic dissection

Early outcomes of acute retrograde dissection in the aortic arch and the ascending aorta data from IRAD

Ascending Aorta: Is The Endovascular Approach Realistic?

Percutaneous Approaches to Aortic Disease in 2018

High Risk Uncomplicated Type B Dissection

Introducing the GORE TAG Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System

Antegrade Thoracic Stent Grafting during Repair of Acute Debakey I Dissection: Promotes Distal Aortic Remodeling and Reduces Late Open Re-operation

Aortic Neck Issues Associated Clinical Sequelae/Implications for Graft Choice

Jean M Panneton, MD Professor of Surgery Program Director Vascular Surgery Chief EVMS. Arch Pathology: The Endovascular Era is here

AAA Management: A Review of Current Therapy, Techniques, Outcomes and Best Practices

Endoanchor-assisted TEVAR

Experience of endovascular procedures on abdominal and thoracic aorta in CA region

Accepted Manuscript. Is A More Extensive Operation Justified for Acute Type A Dissection Repair? Dr. Leonard N. Girardi

What is the benefit. of MEP s in BEVAR for TAAA. in preventing paraplegia?

Anatomical challenges in EVAR

CT of Acute Thoracic Aortic Syndromes Stuart S. Sagel, M.D.

Transcription:

Evaluation of Dynamic Intimal Flap Movement in Acute Stanford Type B Aortic Dissections (ATBD) and the Effects of Thoracic Endovascular Stent Grafting Frank R. Arko, III, MD, Jeko Madjarov, MD, Aaron Hurd, MD, Liam P. Ryan, MD, Stephen G. Lalka, MD, Christopher Boyes, MD, Tzvi Nussbaum, MD, and Timothy S. Roush, MD Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte, NC

Evaluation of Dynamic Intimal Flap Movement in Acute Stanford Type B Aortic Dissections (ATBD) and the Effects of Thoracic Endovascular Stent Grafting Frank R. Arko, III, MD, Jeko Madjarov, MD, Aaron Hurd, MD, Liam P. Ryan, MD, Stephen G. Lalka, MD, Christopher Boyes, MD, Tzvi Nussbaum, MD, and Timothy S. Roush, MD Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute Carolinas Medical Center Charlotte, NC

No disclosures.

3 per 100,000 persons per year 9,000 new cases annually 25% treated with TEVAR Acute, complicated type B dissection (TBD) Mortality rates up to 50% TEVAR: decreased in-hospital morbidity and mortality Uncomplicated or chronic dissection Traditionally treated with optimal medical management Aneurysmal degeneration or rupture in 20-50%

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) offers patients with difficult pathology and limited options a potential treatment Evidence supports TEVAR in complicated Stanford type B aortic dissections Short term outcomes of TEVAR and Stanford type B aortic dissections have shown low morbidity and mortality Long-term results remain relatively unknown including knowledge of the specific structural changes of the aorta over time following endograft placement 1. Aortic remodeling, volumetric analysis, and clinical outcomes of endoluminal exclusion of acute complicated type B thoracic aortic dissections. Kim, KM, Donayre CE, Reynolds TS, Kopchok GE, Walot I, et al: J Vasc Surg 2011;54316-24; discussion: 324-5

Chronically patent False Lumen is independent risk factor: Aneurysmal degeneration and dilatation Dissection-related rupture and death False lumen thrombosis (FLT) predicts better long-term prognosis Goals of endovascular stent graft placement Cover proximal intimomedial tear Re-expand the true lumen Post-operative false lumen thrombosis Unable to reliably predict FLT after TEVAR

Strategies that lead to true lumen volume expansion and false lumen flow reduction indicate successful therapy TEVAR forces considerable volumetric changes in the aorta Clinical responses appear to directly relate to these volumetric changes and intra-arterial flap stiffness

Using two-dimensional phase contrast MRI, chronicity yields considerable reduction of intra-arterial septum compliance and contraction 10 type B aortic dissection patients All had 2D phase contrast MRI 5 had mid-term follow-up (mean 155 days) Max IS contraction, motion parameters Potential ability to define chronicity by examining behavior of the diseased aorta and determine suitability for TEVAR

-aortic diameter differences -oscillation of the intimal flap

To evaluate and characterize the intimal flap of the visceral aorta prior to and immediately following thoracic endovascular stent graft placement in acute Stanford type B aortic dissections.

Between Sept 2011 and Aug 2012, 48 consecutive patients were treated with thoracic stent grafts for aneurysms (n=24), dissections (n=19), and transections (n=5). Of those with type B aortic dissections 11 were chronic and 8 acute (less than 14 days). Intravascular Ultrasound was utilized to record the aortic flap movement at the superior mesenteric artery during one RR-interval of the ECG. Flap movement was recorded pre and post thoracic endovascular stent graft placement which was extended from coverage of the entry tear to the level of the celiac artery in all 8 acute TBAD INSERT: IVUS at SMA picture PRE-TEVAR vs POST-TEVAR 12

Intravascular ultrasound Volcano 8.35 MHz catheter Left renal vein identified for correct orientation A 10-second data loop of aortic wall and intimal flap motion was then recorded for further analysis prior to and following TEVAR 13

Original IVUS images captured frame by frame throughout the cardiac with a DICOM viewer with gain set at 40 Allowed for area/diameter measurements 14

SCION imaging software used to invert each image to its negative, gain threshold changed to 140 allowing evaluation and shading of aortic wall and intimal flap during cardiac cycle 15

Measurements from inner - inner wall in short (AP) and long (lateral) axes through epicenter of true lumen and the aortic wall Mean, minimum, and maximum diameters recorded during cardiac cycle Lumen bounded to assess area (cm 2 ) Frames independently reviewed by two blind observers 16

Continuous variables indicated as mean +/- SD Changes in area and diameters were analyzed using the Student s t-test Changes of the same variable (aortic wall motion and intimal flap movement) were compared using analysis of variance for repeated measurements. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant Analysis of measurement method comparison data according to Bland and Altman performed to analyze repeatability & compare measurements b/w observers. 17

Flap Movement Index (FMI) FMI=[(TDmax/ADmax-TDmin/ADmin)]/TDmin/ADmin X 100(%) Flap Area Index (FAI) FAI=TAmax-TAmin/TAmin X 100.

PRE-TEVAR POST-TEVAR p-value ACUTE (n=8) TD min (mm) 11.25 +/- 1.7 16.00 +/- 1.8 p=0.0001 TD max (mm) 14.50 +/- 1.29 19.25 +/- 2.2 p=0.0001 TA min (cm 2 ) 1.38 +/- 0.21 2.97 +/- 0.33 p=0.0001 TA max (cm 2 ) 2.70 +/- 0.42 3.53 +/- 0.22 p=0.0001 AD min (mm) 22.75 +/- 1.5 22.75 +/- 1.5 p=0.947 AD max (mm) 24.5 +/- 2.08 24.75 +/- 2.2 p=0.81 *Intraobserver & Interobserver repeatability coefficients revealed no significant difference within or b/w observers

Of the 8 patients treated in this study with TEVAR No mortality No SCI No Stroke All patients had complete thrombosis of the false lumen at 1 month

Flap Movement Index (FMI) FMI=[(TDmax/ADmax-TDmin/ADmin)]/TDmin/ADmin X 100(%) FMI (Pre-TEVAR) = 19.63+/-2.3% FMI (Post-TEVAR)= 10.66+/-1.9% (p=0.0001) Flap Area Index (FAI) FAI=TAmax-TAmin/TAmin X 100(%) FAI (Pre-TEVAR) = 95.65+/- 21% (p=0.0001) FAI (Post-TEVAR)) = 18.85+/- 4.2% *Intraobserver & Interobserver repeatability coefficients revealed no significant difference within or b/w observers

Presentation (8/29/2012) Post-TEVAR (11/9/2012)

TEVAR offers a promising solution to patients with acute Stanford type B aortic dissections This is the first study to evaluate and characterize the dynamic aortic flap movement in acute aortic dissections of the visceral aorta before and after TEVAR Aortic morphologic changes occur immediately after TEVAR There is an immediate and significant increase in the true lumen diameter and area. TEVAR significantly minimizes the movement of the intimal flap with no significant changes in overall aortic wall motion.

This stabilization of the intimal flap has been associated with complete thrombosis of the false lumen in these cases without distal reperfusion at 1 month follow-up. Further studies to determine the clinical significance of flap stabilization are required, however, the use of intravascular ultrasound to measure the flap intimal index and area may be a useful adjunct to predict false lumen thrombosis.