J Radiol Sci 2011; 36: 49-53 Glomus Tumor of the Stomach Yuan-Chun Huang 1 Chen-Te Chou 2 Yu-Cheng Hong 1 Shang-Yun Ho 1 Kwo-Whei Lee 1 Hwa-Koon Wu 1 Department of Medical Imaging 1, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan Department of Radiology 2, Changhua Christian Hospital, Erlin Branch, Changhua, Taiwan ABSTRACT Glomus tumors are uncommon submucosal lesions of the stomach. We report a 57-year-old female who developed symptom of tarry stool for one week with initial clinical interpretation as gastric carcinoma by gastroendoscopic study. Finally the tumor was confirmed by microscopic histological study of an endoscopic biopsy specimen as a glomus tumor of the stomach. The sonographic, endoscopic, endosonographic, computed tomography, magnetic resonance image and histologic features of a gastric glomus tumor are reviewed from the literature. Multimodality images can contribute to the pre-operative diagnosis. Correct identification of this essentially benign and uncommon gastric tumor can prevent unnecessary radical operative procedures. Glomus tumors are infrequent mesenchymal tumors which are composed of modified smooth muscle cells. They represent a neoplastic counterpart of perivascular glomus bodies, which are one type of neuromyoarterial receptors that are sensitive to variations in temperature and play a role in the regulation of arteriolar blood flow [1]. In most cases, glomus tumors are benign neoplasms that affect subcutaneous and submucosal tissue and occur in the gastrointestinal tract, solid organs (e.g. liver, kidney) and the extremities. Most such tumors are located in the subungual regions of the fingertips, the palms, the wrists, and the toes. Visceral glomus tumors of the stomach are uncommon disease. They are much less common than gastrointestinal stromal tumors, with a 1:100 ratio [2]. Gastric glomus tumors generally present with non-specific symptoms, such as epigastric pain, loss of appetite and gastrointestinal bleeding. More than 20 percent of patients had gastrointestinal bleeding [3], which can be acute, even life-threatening or chronic, with anemia. Glomus tumors may remain clinically silent until ulceration of the overlying mucosa has developed. CASE REPORT A 57-year-old female, who was a housewife, developed the symptoms of abdominal discomfort and general weakness since three months. She had past history of end-stage renal disease under regular continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. There was tarry stool which was noted for one week. The hemoglobin level was 7.0 g/dl, with a hematocrit of 20.8%. The platelet count and coagulation profile were normal. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopic study was performed and revealed an ulcerative mass with hemorrhage, located on the posterior wall of the gastric antrum (Fig. 1). The ulcer measured 1.2 cm in radius and presented with irregular bulging margin. Due to the initial clinical impression as Bormann type II gastric carcinoma, biopsy was done. Biphasic contrastenhanced abdominal computed tomography scan showed a well-defined submucosal nodular tumor, measuring approximately 2.9 cm in radius, at the gastric antrum with prominent enhancement in post-contrast study. The differential diagnosis included glomus tumor, carcinoid, neuroendocrine tumor, and hemangioma (Fig. 2). An Correspondence Author to: Hwa-Koon Wu Department of Medical Imaging, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan No. 135 Nan-Xiao Street, Changhua 500, Taiwan 49
Figure 1 Figure 1. Gastroendoscopic finding shows a 1.2 cm ulcerative mass (black arrow) with hemorrhage and irregular bulging margin on the posterior wall of the stomach antrum. Figure 2 2a 2b 2c Figure 2. Biphasic contrast-enhanced CT scan shows a well-defined tumor (white arrow) with persistent hypervascular enhancement. a. Noncontrast-enhanced CT scan. b. Prominent enhancement of the tumor up to the same level of portal vein in arterial phase. c. This enhancement persists to portal venous phase. 50
Figure 3 Figure 3. Abdominal sonogram showed a submucosal hyper vascular tumor in the antral wall of the stomach. abdominal sonogram showed a submucosal hypervascular tumor at the antrum of the stomach (Fig. 3). Endosonographic study revealed a 3 2.8-cm hyperechoic homogeneous well-defined, round-shaped lesion with central ulceration and a calcification spot which was located at muscularis propria layer of the stomach with invasion of the mucosal layer (Fig. 4). Biopsy of the gastric lesion was done and histological examination suggested glomus tumor of the stomach. Microscopically, the specimen showed ulcer with necrotic debris, and leukocytic infiltrate. Some round tumor cells surrounding some vascular spaces were seen beneath the ulcer. The tumor cells were round, with centrally located uniform nuclei. The mitotic figure was hard to find in the section. The immunohistochemical study demonstrates that these cells were positive for smooth muscle actin (Fig. 5) and negative for cytokeratin, CD34 and CD117. After five days hospitalization with supportive care, the patient was discharged in stable condition. DISCUSSION The glomus tumor was first described by Barre and Masson in 1924 and was identified as derived from the pericytes of Zimmerman by Murray and Stout in 1942 [4]. Although gastric glomus tumors can be considered more likely benign, a small possibility of malignant behavior cannot be ruled out. Particularly larger gastric glomus tumors require close follow-up [5]. Glomus tumors of the stomach typically appear as a submucosal nodule or mass on the greater curvature side of the antrum [6]. Clinically, this uncommon tumor can mimic most of the tumor lesions of the stomach, in spite of its benign or malignant nature. In barium study, previously reported cases were localized on the greater curvature side of the antrum in the majority of cases, and they appear as smooth submucosal masses with or without ulceration [6]. The differentiation from the more common gastric lesion, especially malignant tumors, is most important. Macroscopic appearances on gastroendoscopy are non-diagnostic. On triphasic contrast-enhanced CT scan, gastric glomus tumors manifest as well-defined submucosal masses with homogeneous density on unenhanced study and may contain calcification spots [7]. After contrast medium administration, these tumors show strong enhancement on arterial phase images and persistent enhancement on portal venous phase images [8]. Regarding the MRI, these tumors are slightly hypointense on T1-weighted images and slightly hyperintense on T2-weighted images and are hypervascular and demonstrate persistent enhancement after gadopentetate dimeglumine administration [8]. Glomus tumor of the stomach should be included in the differential diagnosis if there is a solitary, hypervascular submucosal tumor on the greater curvature side of the antrum. Other mesenchymal tumors, such as carcinoid tumor, neurilemmoma, hemangioma, and GIST, may show a similar presentation on contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan. Hemangioma may have phleboliths that are more easily indentified on CT scan. Furthermore, hemangioma may have higher signal on T2-weighted MRI images. Imaging characteristics of GIST are variable [6]. 51
Figure 4 Figure 4. Endosonographic findings. a. It shows a 3 2.8-cm sized well circumscribed homogeneous hyperechoic tumor with central ulceration in the fourth sonographic layer of the gastric wall with focal defect in the mucosal layer. b. Characteristically more hypoechoic halo equal to echogenecity of the proper muscle layer encloses the tumor. c. A calcification spot is noted in the tumor. 4a 4b 4c Small tumors appear as intramural masses. As the tumors grow, they stretch the overlying mucosa and can ulcerate. When large (>5 cm), the tumors often appear exophytic and may contain areas of central necrosis or calcification [9, 10]. Central areas of low attenuation correspond to hemorrhage, necrosis, or cyst formation [11]. Leiomyoma, lipoma, and ectopic pancreas may be differentiated from glomus tumor, owing to their location and enhancement pattern on CT scan [8]. As a further matter, due to macroscopic fat content of lipoma, it can be easily identified on CT scan [12]. Aneurysms may be rule out by serial images on CT scan. The sonographic findings have been described as a hypoechoic mass in the third or fourth submucosal layers with internal heterogeneous echogenicity mixed with hyperechoic spots and lacking a capsule [13]. Endosonographic appearances are generally heterogeneous and 52
Figure 5 5a 5b Figure 5. Histologic and immunohistochemical stain findings. a. The tumor is composed of sheets of uniform small round cells around abundant, variable sized dilated vessels. The tumor cells have round, regularly shaped nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasms and show no mitosis or nuclear atypia (H&E stain, 400). b. On immunohistochemistry, tumor cells were positive for smooth muscle actin-ab reaction (Immunohistochemical stain, 100). poorly-reflective, and consequently fail to differentiate glomus tumor from other potential diagnoses by this modality alone [13]. Histological confirmation of the diagnosis is only possible when a fine-needle biopsy is inclusive of abnormal tissue. Gastric glomus tumors are in essence benign in nature; hence recognition of these lesions preoperatively may spare the patient a more extensive surgical resection [14]. We have reviewed the multimodality imaging presentations of other reported glomus tumors of the stomach in the literature and summarized the imaging features that help to establish the correct diagnosis of glomus tumors of the stomach. REFERENCES 1. Caccamo D, Danedo M, Gordon RE. Glomus tumor of the stomach. Mt Sinai J Med 1987; 54: 344-347 2. Miettinen M, Paal E, Lasota J, et al. Gastrointestinal glomus tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26: 301-311 3. Ichihashi H, Tonomura K, Kondo T, et al. Glomus tumor of the stomach. Jpn J Surg 1977; 7: 253-257 4. Murray MR, Stout AP. Glomus tumor: investigation of its distribution and behavior, and identity of its epithelioid cell. Am J Pathol 1942; 18: 183-204 5. Folpe AL, Fanburg-Smith JC, Miettinen M, et al. Atypical and malignant glomus tumor: analysis of 52 cases, with proposal for the reclassification of glomus tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2001; 25: 1-12 6. Park SH, Han JK, Kim TK, et al. Unusual gastric tumors: radiologic pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1999; 19: 1435-1446 7. Kim JK, Won JH, Cho YK, et al. Glomus tumor of the stomach: CT findings. Abdom Imaging 2001; 26: 303-305 8. Liu KM, Wang HP, Tseng WY, et al. Glomus tumor of the stomach: MRI findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 1190-1192 9. McLeod A J, Zor noza J, Shirkoda A, et al. Leiomyosarcoma: computed tomographic findings. Radiology 1984; 152:133-136 10. Pannu HK, Hruban RH, Fishman EK, et al. CT of gastric leiomyosarcoma: patterns of involvement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 369-373 11. Sharp RM, Ansel HJ, Keel SB, et al. Best cases from the AFIP: gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Radiographics 2001; 21: 1557-1560 12. Heiken JP. Forde KA, Gold RP. Computed tomography as a definitive method for diagnosing gastrointestinal lipomas. Radiology 1982; 142: 409-414 13. Imamura A, Tochihara M, Natsui K, et al. Glomus tumor of the stomach: endoscopic ultrasonographic findings. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89: 271-272 14. Lee HW, Lee JJ, Yang DH, et al. A clinicopathologic study of glomus tumor of the stomach. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40: 717-720 53