Is close radiographic and clinical control after repair of acute type A aortic dissection really necessary for improved long-term survival?

Similar documents
Long-Term Results After Repair of Type A Acute Aortic Dissection According to False Lumen Patency

What Determines Aortic False Lumen Growth Post Dissection?

Effect of false lumen partial thrombosis on repaired acute type A aortic dissection

Acute Aortic Dissection: Decision and Outcome

Asymptomatic Radiology / Clinical data Report / Cohort bias Referral bias. UCSF Vascular Symposium April 7-9, Acute Aortic Dissection

Influence of Radiologically Evident Residual Intimal Tear on Expansion of Descending Aorta Following Surgery for Acute Type I Aortic Dissection

Antegrade Thoracic Stent Grafting during Repair of Acute Debakey I Dissection: Promotes Distal Aortic Remodeling and Reduces Late Open Re-operation

Aggressive Resection/Reconstruction of the Aortic Arch in Type A Dissection

Influence of patent false lumen on long-term outcome after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

Frozen Elephant Trunk in Acute Aortic Dissection

Descending endograft for DeBakey type 1 aortic dissection: pro

Is there a way to predict the risk in uncomplicated Type B aortic dissections? FRANS MOLL University Medical Centre Utrecht - Netherlands

Joseph E. Bavaria, MD

Effects of partial thrombosis on distal aorta after repair of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection

Management of Acute Aortic Syndromes. M. Grabenwoger, MD Dept. of Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital Hietzing, Vienna, Austria

Strategies in the surgical treatment of type A aortic arch dissection

Effects of Early Anticoagulation on the Degree of Thrombosis After Repair of Acute DeBakey Type I Aortic Dissection

Follow-up of Aortic Dissection: How, How Often, Which Consequences Euro Echo 2011

Accepted Manuscript. Is A More Extensive Operation Justified for Acute Type A Dissection Repair? Dr. Leonard N. Girardi

A Case of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection: Limited Role of Laboratory Testing for the Diagnosis of Mesenteric Ischemia

Early outcomes of acute retrograde dissection in the aortic arch and the ascending aorta data from IRAD

Extended Arch Techniques for Acute Aortic Dissection: a systematic review and classification

Importance of false lumen thrombosis in type B aortic dissection prognosis

UC SF An Algorithm to Choose Which Uncomplicated (Asymptomatic) Acute Type B Dissection Patients Should Undergo TEVAR. Disclosures.

Aggressive Resection/Reconstruction of the Aortic Arch in Type A Dissection: Con

CT angiography in type I acute aortic dissection complicated with malperfusion - a visual review of obstruciton patterns

No Disclosure. Aortic Dissection in Japan. This. The Challenge of Acute and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissections with Endovascular Aortic Repair

TEVAR for Chronic dissections: indications for TEVAR, long term results

STS/EACTS LatAm CV Conference 2017

Therapeutic Pathway In Acute Aortic Dissection. Speaker: Cesare Quarto Consultant Cardiac Surgeon Royal Brompton Hospital, London UK

AORTIC DISSECTIONS Current Management. TOMAS D. MARTIN, MD, LAT Professor, TCV Surgery Director UF Health Aortic Disease Center University of Florida

Acute Type B dissection. Closure of the infra diaphragmatic tear: how and when?

Late False Lumen Expansion Predicted by Preoperative Blood Flow Simulation in a Patient with Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection

Clinical Outcome of Emergency Surgery for Complicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

Remodeling of the Remnant Aorta after Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery

Optimised management of type A aortic dissection with visceral malperfusion concept to reconsider

Type A acute aortic dissection (A-AAD) remains to

Open fenestration for complicated acute aortic B dissection

Are stent-grafts for acute type B dissection durable? Est-ce que les stents graft pour la dissection aigue de type B sont efficaces à moyen terme?

Optimal repair of acute aortic dissection

Vascular Intervention

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Treatment of acute type B aortic dissection: Current status

UC SF Early Intervention in Type B Dissection: Results From the INSTEAD XL Trial. Acute Type B Dissection. Outline. Disclosures.

I-Hui Wu, M.D. Ph.D. Clinical Assistant Professor Cardiovascular Surgical Department National Taiwan University Hospital

Understanding the Predictors of Aneurysmal Degeneration in Type B Dissection

Animesh Rathore, MD 4/22/17. The Great Debate 45yo Man With Uncomplicated Acute TBAD: The Case For Medical Management

A Loeys-Dietz Patient with a Trans-Atlantic Odyssey. Repeated Aortic Root Surgery ending with a Huge Left Main Coronary Aneurysm 4

Type B Dissection Sub-Categories

Aortic Center of Excellence at Sentara

La dissection aortique de type B : Dépistage et Suivi

The conundrum about complicated and uncomplicated type B dissection New concepts?

Is a minimally invasive approach for re-operative aortic valve replacement superior to standard full resternotomy?

OPEN AND ENDOVASCULAR TECHNIQUES IN THE CARDIOTHORACIC SURGEON S HANDS

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing, China;

Surgery for Acquired Cardiovascular Disease. The fate of the distal aorta after repair of acute type A aortic dissection

Dissection de type B: l étude Instead et corollaire stratégique

Midterm Change of Descending Aortic False Lumen After Repair of Acute Type I Dissection

Disclosures: Acute Aortic Syndrome. A. Michael Borkon, M.D. Director of CV Surgery Mid America Heart Institute Saint Luke s Hospital Kansas City, MO

High Risk Uncomplicated Type B Dissection

Emerging Roles for Distal Aortic Interventions in Type A Dissection Surgery

Endovascular surgery in Marfan syndrome: CON

What is the best treatment for False Lumen growth after type B Dissection

Aortic Dissection in BAV Patients: The IRAD Experience and Beyond

Aortic Arch/ Thoracoabdominal Aortic Replacement

When and how to replace the aortic arch for type A dissection

UC SF. Disclosures. Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair 4/24/2009. Management of Acute Dissections: Is There Still a Role for Open Surgery?

CURRENT UNDERSTANDING: ANATOMY & PHYSIOLOGY TYPE B AORTIC DISSECTION ANATOMY ANATOMY. Medial degeneration characterized by

Bicuspid aortic root spared during ascending aorta surgery: an update of long-term results

Do the Data Support Endovascular Therapy for Descending Thoracic AD? Woong Chol Kang, M.D.

Transluminal Stent-graft Placement endovascular surgery

Hybrid Repair of a Complex Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Controversy exists regarding the extent of proximal

The Petticoat Technique Managing Type B Dissection with both Early and Long Term Considerations

Gelweave TM. Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Graft Geometries. Ante-Flo TM 4 Branch Plexus. Siena Valsalva TM Trifurcate Arch Graft. Coselli.

Case 9799 Stanford type A aortic dissection: US and CT findings

Type II arch hybrid debranching procedure

Surgical indications in ascending aorta aneurysms: What do we know? Jean-Luc MONIN, MD, PhD. Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, FRANCE

Quo Vadis Cardiovascular Surgery: The Role of Open and Endovascular Techniques in the future (21st Century)

Acute non-complicated TBD Do need TEVAR treatment

What Are the Current Guidelines for Treating Thoracic Aortic Disease?

Aortic remodeling with frozen elephant trunk technique for Stanford type A aortic dissection using Japanese J graft open stent graft

Frozen Elephant Trunk procedure in patients with aortic dissection type B and concomitant aortic arch or ascending aortic pathology

Surgical outcomes for acute type A aortic dissection with aggressive primary entry resection

Early- and medium-term results after aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk techniques a single center study

Acute dissections of the descending thoracic aorta (Debakey

Aortic dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome based on the IRAD data

1 7 central operation SMA SMA

Total Endovascular Repair Type A Dissection. Eric Herget Interventional Radiology

SURGICAL INTERVENTION IN AORTOPATHIES ZOHAIR ALHALEES, MD RIYADH, SAUDI ARABIA

Update on Acute Aortic Syndrome

Combined Endovascular and Surgical Repair of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Pathology: Hybrid TEVAR

Midterm Results of Aortic Arch Replacement in a Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection With an Intimal Tear in the Aortic Arch

Surgical Procedures and Complications

B myonephropathic metabolic syndrome MNMS 33 CT DeBakey IIIb MNMS

THE EVOLUTION OF FET-TECHNIQUE

Total arch replacement with separated graft technique and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion

The morbidity and mortality rates associated with the. Outcome of Surgical Treatment in Patients With Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

S. Bruce Greenberg, MD FNASCI and President, NASCI Professor of Radiology and Pediatrics University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Indications for stent grafts in type B aortic dissection

Transcription:

doi:10.1510/icvts.2010.239764 Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 11 (2010) 620 625 www.icvts.org Best evidence topic - Aortic and aneurysmal Is close radiographic and clinical control after repair of acute type A aortic dissection really necessary for improved long-term survival? Franziska Albrecht, Friedrich Eckstein, Peter Matt* Division of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital, Spitalstrasse 21, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland Received 2 April 2010; received in revised form 17 July 2010; accepted 22 July 2010 Summary A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether radiographic and clinical control after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (AAD) is needed for improved long-term survival. Altogether, 118 relevant papers were identified using the reported search, of which seven represented the best evidence to answer the question. The author, journal, date and of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that most patients after surgery for AAD remain at risk for dissection-related aortic complications. Late aortic growth is often slow and linear, but the occurrence of major aortic events is unpredictable and can initially present more than a decade postoperatively. Risk factors for rapid late aortic enlargement and s include patent or partially thrombosed false lumen, large aortic size, Marfan syndrome and younger age. Whether performing a more extensive first procedure (e.g. aortic arch replacement"elephant trunk) can be translated into improved outcome and a lower incidence of aorta-related s remains to be elucidated. Aortic rates range between 10% and )20% within the first 10 years. Optimal systolic blood pressure control (-120 mmhg), including b-blocker therapy, seems to decrease late aortic dilatation and the incidence of aortic s. Close and careful lifelong surveillance of patients after AAD repair including radiographic and clinical controls to evaluate the status of the remaining aorta, and thus to facilitate adaptations of medical therapy and planning of timely reprocedures seems mandatory for improved long-term survival. A suggested timeframe for computed tomographic (CT) imaging after surgery for AAD is before discharge, at six and 12 months postdissection and, if stable, annually thereafter. Patients with large aneurysms (aortic diameter G50 mm) should be maintained at radiographic intervals of six months or less. If the thoracic aneurysm is moderate in size and remains stable over time, magnetic resonance imaging instead of CTscanning is reasonable to minimize the patient s radiation exposure. 2010 Published by European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved. Keywords: Aortic dissection type A; Surgery; Outcome; Aortic growth; Reoperation 1. Introduction A best evidence topic was constructed according to a structured protocol, which has been fully described w1x. 2. Three-part question In wpatients after surgery for acute type A aortic dissectionx is wclose radiographic and clinical controlx necessary compared to wsymptom-only based investigationsx for improved wlong-term survivalx? 3. Clinical scenario A 64-year-old man undergoes emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (AAD). The postoperative course is uneventful. A computed tomographic (CT) scan before discharge shows an unremarkable aortic prosthesis and a patent residual false lumen in the aortic arch and descending aorta. The maximum diameter of the thoracic aorta is 45 mm. You ask yourself how often this patient should *Corresponding author. Tel.: q41 61 328 7180; fax: q41 61 265 7324. E-mail address: pmatt@uhbs.ch (P. Matt). 2010 Published by European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery undergo radiographic and clinical control to identify early dissection-related aortic complications and to achieve improved long-term survival? 4. Search strategy Medline 2000 2010 was searched using Pubmed to obtain the relevant papers, with the terms wsurgeryx AND wacute type A aortic dissectionx AND wlong-term survivalx. 5. Search outcome A total of 118 relevant papers were found, from which seven were selected as representing the best evidence to answer the clinical question (Table 1). 6. Results We reviewed seven studies including clinical and radiographic (mainly CT-scanning) long-term data of 1250 patients after surgery for AAD. Geirsson et al. w2x analyzed 221 patients after surgery for AAD. Freedom from proximal s was 95.1% and 77.8% at five and 10 years, respectively. Aortic valve

F. Albrecht et al. / Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 11 (2010) 620 625 621 Table 1. Best evidence papers Geirsson et al., 221 consecutive Aortic rate 12.2% in 10 years Aortic valve resuspension (2007), Ann patients, between techniques are durable in most Thorac Surg, 1993 and 2004, Freedom from 95.1% at 5 years patients, and long-term USA, w2x single institution proximal 77.8% at 10 years survival is similar to that of report those with aortic root Retrospective Freedom from distal 86.5% at 5 years replacement. Proximal cohort study 75.4% at 10 years s are more common (level III) in patients with preoperative Risk factors for aortic Proximal aorta: cardiac cardiac malperfusion. In s malperfusion whazard ratio contrast, younger patients and (HR) 6.7x those with DeBakey type I Distal aorta: age (HR 0.96), dissection showed a higher DeBakey type I dissection (HR 10.6) rate of distal s In-hospital mortality of 12.7% In-hospital mortality of s Actuarial survival (for all patients) 18.2% (proximal aorta) 31.2% (distal aorta) 79.2% at 1 year 62.8% at 5 years 46.3% at 10 years Halstead et al., 179 consecutive Aortic growth rate per 0.8 mmyyear at the aortic Secondary aortic dilatation is (2007), J Thorac patients, between year arch, 1.0 mmyyear at the often slow and linear, but Cardiovasc Surg, 1986 and 2003, descending aorta, unpredictable. The likelihood USA, w3x single institution 0.8 mmyyear at the for aortic is abdominal aorta increased in patients with Retrospective Marfan syndrome, without cohort study, Risk factors for rapid Initial aortic diameter effect on late survival. The (level III) aortic growth rate G40 mm, patent false sum of deaths in all patients lumen, male sex caused by rupture, graft infection and unknown causes Aortic rate 17% in 17 years, five patients represents 40% of late deaths and site of at the aortic root and 25 at indicating that close and the distal aorta careful follow-up seems mandatory for improved Risk factor for aortic Marfan syndrome long-term prognosis Overall hospital 13.4% mortality after initial surgery In-hospital mortality of 4% s Actuarial survival rates (for hospital survivors) 90.7% at 1 year 77.9% at 5 years 66.2% at 10 years Best Evidence Topic Immer et al., 64 patients with Aortic growth rate 40.6% with no aortic Younger age, dissection (2005), Eur J at least three progression, 42.2% with involving the supraaortic Cardiothorac CT-scans slight progression branches andyor combined Surg, postoperatively (10 20 mm over with malperfusion and patent Switzerland, w4x and DeBakey 60 months), 17.2% with false lumen favour secondary type I dissection, important progression dilatation. Late aortic Retrospective between 1994 and ()20 mm over 60 months) enlargement occurred in the cohort study 2002, single majority of patients in the first (level III) institution report Risk factors for aortic Younger age, female sex, 24 months after progression dissection of supraaortic branches, preoperative cerebral, visceral or peripheral malperfusion, patent false lumen Aortic rate 14.1% (Continued on next page)

622 F. Albrecht et al. / Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 11 (2010) 620 625 Table 1. (Continued) Kimura et al., 243 consecutive Aortic growth rate per Patients with patent false Patent false lumen is a strong (2008), J Thorac patients, between year lumen: 1.1 mmyyear predictor for late aortic Cardiovasc Surg, 1997 and 2006, (arch), 1.9 mmyyear dilatation, however it is not Japan, w5x single institution (proximal descending), 1.3 necessarily associated with report (distal descending), rapid secondary aortic Retrospective 1.6 mmyyear (abdominal) dilatation needing. cohort study Patients with thrombosed Long-term outcomes were (level III) false lumen: 0 mmyyear acceptable and did not differ (thoracic aorta), according to the status of the 0.52 mmyyear (abdominal) residual lumen Risk factor for rapid aortic growth Predictive factors for residual patent false lumen Freedom from distal Risk factors for aortic Patent false lumen Age -70 years wodds ratio (OR) 4.5x, limb ischemia (OR 2.4), male sex (OR 1.4), smoking (OR 1.3) 99% at 1 year, 97.4% at 5 years, 89.5% at 10 years Patent false lumen, Marfan syndrome In-hospital mortality of 7.3% Actuarial survival rate (with in-hospital deaths) 89.5% at 1 year, 79.5% at 5 years, 71.3% at 10 years Zierer et al., 201 consecutive Aortic growth rate per 6 mmyyear (descending), Aortic expansion is most (2007), Ann patients, between year (in those 3.8 mmyyear common in the descending Thorac Surg, 1984 and 2006, demonstrating aortic (diaphragmatic), aorta. Timing of onset of USA, w6x single institution expansion) 4.1 mmyyear (abdominal) aortic enlargement is report unpredictable, and therefore Retrospective Predictors of aortic Aortic diameter, elevated requires lifelong radiographic cohort study growth systolic blood pressure follow-up. Small aneurysms (level III) ()140 mmhg, SBP), (-35 mm diameter) seldom patent false lumen demonstrate aortic growth at -1 year intervals, whereas Aortic rate 15% in up to 170 months, aneurysms G50 mm and site of 7 at the aortic root or arch demonstrate aortic growth and 15 at the descending even within intervals of aorta 6 months or less. Optimal blood pressure control (SBP Freedom from 95% at 1 year, -120 mmhg) and b-blocker (among 90% at 5 years, therapy decrease the incidence operative survivors) 74% at 10 years, of aortic enlargement and late 65% at 15 years Predictors of late Marfan syndrome (OR 10.4), non-resected primary tear (OR 4), absence of postoperative b-blocker therapy (OR 3.3), elevated SBP Operative mortality of 16% Actuarial survival rate (for all operative survivors) 90% at 1 year, 76% at 5 years, 59% at 10 years, 49% at 15 years (Continued on next page)

F. Albrecht et al. / Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 11 (2010) 620 625 623 Table 1. (Continued) Fattouch et al., 224 consecutive Aortic growth rate per Patients with patent false Patent false lumen is a (2009), Ann patients, between year lumen: 2.8 mmyyear predictor of late aortic Thorac Surg, 1992 and 2006, Patients with occluded dilatation, retreatment and Italy, w7x report from two false lumen: 1.1 mmyyear death, particularly in those institutions Patients with Marfan with Marfan syndrome or with Retrospective syndrome: 2.4 mmyyear descending aortic diameter cohort study Patients without Marfan )45 mm (level IV) syndrome: 0.8 mmyyear Risk factors for rapid aortic growth Aortic rate and site of Patent false lumen, Marfan syndrome 22.7% in a mean follow-up of 88"44 months, 9 at the aortic root and 34 at the descending aorta Freedom from Patients with patent false on the lumen: 89.3% at 1 year, descending aorta 72.2% at 5 years, 63.7% at 10 years Patients with thrombosed lumen: 99% at 1 year, 97.2% at 5 years, 94.2% at 10 years Patients with Marfan syndrome: 97.2% at 1 year, 84.3% at 5 years, 74.5% at 10 years Patients without Marfan syndrome: 98.2% at 1 year, 89.5% at 5 years, 86.4% at 10 years Risk factors for aortic Patent false lumen (HR 15.2), Marfan syndrome (HR 3.5), descending aorta diameter )45 mm (HR 5.8) In-hospital mortality 15.6% Actuarial survival rate (for entire population) 97.7% at 1 year, 88.2% at 5 years, 79.8% at 10 years Song et al., 118 consecutive Aortic growth rate per 0.34 mmyyear (aortic Partial thrombosis of the false (2010), J Thorac patients, between year arch), 0.51 mmyyear lumen is a strong predictor of Cardiovasc Surg, 1997 and 2007, (descending aorta), rapid aortic growth, increased Korea, w8x single institution 0.35 mmyyear (abdominal rate and decreased report aorta) long-term survival. Total arch Retrospective replacement was associated cohort study Risk factor for rapid Partially thrombosed and with a lower incidence of (level III) aortic growth patent false lumen partially thrombosed false lumen, and those patients had Aortic rate 13.4% in 10 years, two no aorta-related reprocedures and site of patients at aortic arch and descending aorta, six at descending aorta, two at the thoracoabdominal aorta, three at the abdominal aorta Best Evidence Topic Freedom from distal aortic reprocedures (for all hospital survivors) 94.6% at 1 year, 78.8% at 5 years, 66.1% at 10 years (Continued on next page)

624 F. Albrecht et al. / Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 11 (2010) 620 625 Table 1. (Continued) Risk factor for aortic Partially thrombosed and patent false lumen Operative mortality of 17.8% Survival 85.5% at 1 year, 67.8% at 5 years, 67.8% at 10 years resuspension techniques were durable and survival was similar to that after aortic root replacement. Freedom from distal was 86.5% and 75.4% at five and 10 years, respectively. Patients -45 years, and those with DeBakey type 1 dissection had a higher risk of distal. In-hospital mortality of was 18.2% in proximal s, and 31.2% in distal s. Long-term survival was 79.2%, 62.8%, and 46.3% at one, five and 10 years, respectively. Halstead et al. w3x revealed postsurgery aortic growth rates of 0.8 mmyyear (aortic arch) and 1 mmyyear (descending aorta). Risk factors for rapid enlargement of the distal aorta were male gender, initial aortic size )40 mm and patency of the false lumen. There was a 17% rate in 17 years follow-up. One (4%) perioperative death occurred among those s. The sum of deaths caused by aortic rupture, graft infection, and unknown causes represented 40% of late deaths corresponding to a two-fold increase in long-term deaths compared with healthy controls. Immer et al. w4x found that younger age, female gender, dissection of the supraaortic branches, preoperative malperfusion or persistent patent false lumen were all risk factors for late aortic dilatation. Over a period of 60 months, aortic growth of up to 20 mm was seen in 42.2%, and of more than 20 mm in 17.2%, among whom more than 80% required aortic. Secondary aortic dilatation occurred in the majority of patients within the first 24 months. Kimura et al. w5x showed that the aortic growth rate is higher in patients with a residual patent false lumen compared with those with a thrombosed lumen. Freedom from distal aortic for all hospital survivors was 99%, 97.4% and 89.5% at one, five and 10 years, respectively. Patients within the thrombosed group showed a tendency to fewer distal s compared with the patent group. Actuarial survival with in-hospital deaths was 89.5%, 79.5% and 71.3% at one, five and 10 years, respectively, and was similar in patients with a patent lumen and those with a thrombosed false lumen. Zierer et al. w6x revealed that Marfan syndrome, nonresected primary tear, absence of postoperative b-blocker therapy, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) of more than 140 mmhg at late follow-up were predictors of late. Risk factors for aortic growth were aortic diameter, elevated SBP and patent false lumen. Moderate aneurysms (35 49 mm) rarely showed growth at -6-month intervals, whereas aneurysms G50 mm demonstrated growth in -6 months. Most important, the timing of the onset of aortic enlargement was unpredictable. Optimal blood pressure control (SBP -120 mmhg) decreased the incidence of secondary aortic dilatation from 34 to 14%, and decreased the incidence of late from 35 to 8%. Freedom from at 10 and 15 years was 79% and 75%, respectively, with b-blocker therapy, and 57% and 25%, respectively, without b-blocker therapy. Fattouch et al. w7x found a rate of 22.7% in a mean follow-up of 88"44 months. Predictors for aortic were aortic size )45 mm, patent false lumen and Marfan syndrome. Actuarial survival rates for the entire population were 97.7%, 88.2% and 79.8% at one, five and 10 years, respectively. Song et al. w8x showed freedom from distal s rates of 94.6%, 78.8% and 66.1% at one, five and 10 years, respectively. They revealed that partial thrombosis compared with completely patent or thrombosed false lumen is a strong predictor of rapid aortic growth, poor long-term survival and aorta-related s. Patients with total arch replacement showed a lower incidence of partial thrombosis in the distal aorta and no aorta-related s. However, the operative mortality of the initial surgery was relatively high with 17.8%. Whether such an aggressive initial approach can be translated into improved outcome remains to be elucidated. 7. Clinical bottom line Patients after repair of AAD often show persistent dissection of the remaining aorta and subsequently, are at risk for aortic complications. Late aortic growth is often slow and linear, but the occurrence of major aortic events is unpredictable. Aortic rates range between 10% and more than 20% within the first 10 years. Optimal SBP control (SBP -120 mmhg), including b-blocker therapy, seems to decrease late aortic dilatation and the incidence of aortic s. Whether ATII receptor blockers and ACE inhibitors may lead to additional benefits (e.g. stabilization of the aortic wall) requires further studies w9x. Close and careful surveillance of patients after AAD repair including radiographic and clinical controls to evaluate the status of the remaining aorta, in order to adapt medical therapy and to plan timely reprocedures seems mandatory for improved long-term survival.

F. Albrecht et al. / Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 11 (2010) 620 625 625 References w1x Dunning J, Prendergast B, Mackway-Jones K. Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 2003;2:405 409. w2x Geirsson A, Bavaria JE, Swarr D, Keane MG, Woo YJ, Szeto WY, Pochettino A. Fate of the residual distal and proximal aorta after acute type A dissection repair using a contemporary surgical reconstruction algorithm. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:1955 1964; discussion 1955 1964. w3x Halstead JC, Meier M, Etz C, Spielvogel D, Bodian C, Wurm M, Shahani R, Griepp RB. The fate of the distal aorta after repair of acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:127 135. w4x Immer FF, Hagen U, Berdat PA, Eckstein FS, Carrel TP. Risk factors for secondary dilatation of the aorta after acute type A aortic dissection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:654 657. w5x Kimura N, Tanaka M, Kawahito K, Yamaguchi A, Ino T, Adachi H. Influence of patent false lumen on long-term outcome after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;136:1160 1166, 1166 e1 e3. w6x Zierer A, Voeller RK, Hill KE, Kouchoukos NT, Damiano RJ Jr, Moon MR. Aortic enlargement and late after repair of acute type A aortic dissection. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:479 486; discussion 486 487. w7x Fattouch K, Sampognaro R, Navarra E, Caruso M, Pisano C, Coppola G, Speziale G, Ruvolo G. Long-term results after repair of type A acute aortic dissection according to false lumen patency. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1244 1250. w8x Song SW, Chang BC, Cho BK, Yi G, Youn YN, Lee S, Yoo KJ. Effects of partial thrombosis on distal aorta after repair of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:841 847 e1; discussion 847. w9x Matt P, Habashi J, Carrel T, Cameron DE, Van Eyk JE, Dietz HC. Recent advances in understanding Marfan syndrome: should we now treat surgical patients with losartan? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:389 394. Best Evidence Topic