Expanding the Horizon: Pioneering DART Bispecific Therapeutics in Areas Beyond Oncology

Similar documents
What is the place of the monoclonal antibodies in the clinic?

Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance. Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco

Alternate Antibody-Based Therapeutic Strategies To Purge the HIV Cell Reservoir

NKTR-255: Accessing The Immunotherapeutic Potential Of IL-15 for NK Cell Therapies

NKTR-255: Accessing IL-15 Therapeutic Potential through Robust and Sustained Engagement of Innate and Adaptive Immunity

Forward Looking Statements

Immunobiology 7. The Humoral Immune Response

Lynn Morris. "Plan B"- bnabs for HIV prevention

Impact of Vorinostat Treatment of Non- Hodgkin s Lymphoma on HIV-1 Latent Reservoir

The Adaptive Immune Responses

Principles of Adaptive Immunity

Antigen Presentation and T Lymphocyte Activation. Abul K. Abbas UCSF. FOCiS

Adaptive Immunity: Humoral Immune Responses

Immunology - Lecture 2 Adaptive Immune System 1

Third line of Defense. Topic 8 Specific Immunity (adaptive) (18) 3 rd Line = Prophylaxis via Immunization!

Generation of Robust Antibody Responses to HIV-1 MPER Antigens in Mice Reconstituted with Cultured B cells

chapter 17: specific/adaptable defenses of the host: the immune response

Novel RCC Targets from Immuno-Oncology and Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Corporate Overview November 2017

Adaptive Immune System

RAISON D ETRE OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM:

A Quarterly Update on HIV Prevention Research. Vol. 8 No. 2

Defensive mechanisms include :

Attribution: University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Microbiology and Immunology

Shiv Pillai Ragon Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School

Scott Abrams, Ph.D. Professor of Oncology, x4375 Kuby Immunology SEVENTH EDITION

B cell activation and antibody production. Abul K. Abbas UCSF

RAISON D ETRE OF THE IMMUNE SYSTEM:

Third line of Defense

Dual-targeting anti- CD47 bispecific antibodies: Safely provoking macrophages to feast NALM-6 tumor cells (B-ALL) Human macrophages

Blood and Immune system Acquired Immunity

T Lymphocyte Activation and Costimulation. FOCiS. Lecture outline

Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc. Corporate Overview

LAG-3: Validation Of Next Generation Checkpoint Pathways

The T cell receptor for MHC-associated peptide antigens

June IMMUNE DESIGN The in vivo generation of cytotoxic CD8 T cells (CTLs)

Identification of novel immune regulators of tumor growth using highthroughput

Medical Virology Immunology. Dr. Sameer Naji, MB, BCh, PhD (UK) Head of Basic Medical Sciences Dept. Faculty of Medicine The Hashemite University

Antibody Dependent Cellular Cytotxic activity: Past and Future. Guido Ferrari, M.D. Duke University Medical Center

2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Exposure to pathogens naturally activates the immune system. Takes days to be effective Pearson Education, Inc.

Immunology Lecture 4. Clinical Relevance of the Immune System

ACTIVATION AND EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS OF CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY AND NK CELLS. Choompone Sakonwasun, MD (Hons), FRCPT

The Adaptive Immune Response. B-cells

VMC-221: Veterinary Immunology and Serology (1+1) Question Bank

ACTR (Antibody Coupled T-cell Receptor): A universal approach to T-cell therapy

Adaptive Immunity: Specific Defenses of the Host

Mon, Wed, Fri 11:00 AM-12:00 PM. Owen, Judy, Jenni Punt, and Sharon Stranford Kuby-Immunology, 7th. Edition. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York.

Induction and Clearance of Latent HIV Infection:

For questions 1-5, match the following with their correct descriptions. (24-39) A. Class I B. Class II C. Class III D. TH1 E. TH2

There are 2 major lines of defense: Non-specific (Innate Immunity) and. Specific. (Adaptive Immunity) Photo of macrophage cell

With over 20 drugs and several viable regimens, the mo6vated pa6ent with life- long access to therapy can control HIV indefinitely, elimina6ng the

Reprogramming Tumor Associated Dendritic Cells for Immunotherapy

IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR CANCER A NEW HORIZON. Ekaterini Boleti MD, PhD, FRCP Consultant in Medical Oncology Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust

1. Overview of Adaptive Immunity

GBR 1302: EFFECT OF CD3-HER2, A BISPECIFIC T CELL ENGAGER ANTIBODY, IN TRASTUZUMAB-RESISTANT CANCERS

Adaptive Immunity. Lecture 14 Biology W3310/4310 Virology Spring Life is simple, but we insist on making it complicated CONFUCIUS

Corporate Overview. June 2017 NASDAQ:FPRX

Chapter 23 Immunity Exam Study Questions

White Blood Cells (WBCs)

Adaptive immunity. Adaptive Immunity. Principles of immune defense. Adaptive immunity. against extracellular or intracellular pathogens

Merus. Corporate Presentation. November 15, 2018

08/02/59. Tumor Immunotherapy. Development of Tumor Vaccines. Types of Tumor Vaccines. Immunotherapy w/ Cytokine Gene-Transfected Tumor Cells

The Lymphatic System and Body Defenses

HIV cure: current status and implications for the future

IAS 2015 Towards an HIV Cure symposium Vancouver Immune recognition following latency reversal

Corporate Presentation May Transforming Immuno-Oncology Using Next-Generation Immune Cell Engagers

Chapter 11. B cell generation, Activation, and Differentiation. Pro-B cells. - B cells mature in the bone marrow.

CELL BIOLOGY - CLUTCH CH THE IMMUNE SYSTEM.

The Immune System. by Dr. Carmen Rexach Physiology Mt San Antonio College

Chapter 17B: Adaptive Immunity Part II

LESSON 2: THE ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY

Unit 5 The Human Immune Response to Infection

The Immune System: Innate and Adaptive Body Defenses Outline PART 1: INNATE DEFENSES 21.1 Surface barriers act as the first line of defense to keep

Antigen-Independent B-Cell Development Bone Marrow

Immune system. Self/non-self recognition. Memory. The state of protection from infectious disease. Acceptance vs rejection

1. Specificity: specific activity for each type of pathogens. Immunity is directed against a particular pathogen or foreign substance.

Corporate Presentation November Transforming Immuno-Oncology Using Next-Generation Immune Cell Engagers

Foundations in Microbiology

Engineered Immune-Mobilising Monoclonal T Cell Receptors for HIV Cure

Designing clinical trials with BiTE antibody constructs by leveraging from nonclinical data. Benno Rattel Biologics Congress Berlin, 2015

Immunology Basics Relevant to Cancer Immunotherapy: T Cell Activation, Costimulation, and Effector T Cells

Adaptive immune responses: T cell-mediated immunity

Test Bank for Basic Immunology Functions and Disorders of the Immune System 4th Edition by Abbas

Module R: Recording the HIV Reservoir

Understanding Checkpoint Inhibitors: Approved Agents, Drugs in Development and Combination Strategies. Michael A. Curran, Ph.D.

Should There be Further Efficacy Testing of T-T cell Based Vaccines that do not Induce Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies?

Chapter 1. Chapter 1 Concepts. MCMP422 Immunology and Biologics Immunology is important personally and professionally!

Chapter 11. B cell generation, Activation, and Differentiation. Pro-B cells. - B cells mature in the bone marrow.

Immunology. Overview. Kris.ne Kra1s, M.D.

Inves)gación básica y curación del VIH- 1

Jefferies 2017 Global Healthcare Conference. Stephen Doberstein, Ph.D. Senior Vice President & Chief Scientific Officer

The potential role of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in HIV Remission and Cure Strategies

Physiology Unit 3. ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY The Specific Immune Response

Leerink Immuno-Oncology Roundtable Conference

T Cell Activation, Costimulation and Regulation

Developing Best in Class BET Inhibitors for Oncology & AI: from Discovery to the Clinic. Kevin G. McLure, PhD EpiCongress July 2014

All animals have innate immunity, a defense active immediately upon infection Vertebrates also have adaptive immunity

Chapter 24 The Immune System

Immune Checkpoints. PD Dr med. Alessandra Curioni-Fontecedro Department of Hematology and Oncology Cancer Center Zurich University Hospital Zurich

Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy

Transcription:

Expanding the Horizon: Pioneering DART Bispecific Therapeutics in Areas Beyond Oncology Paul Moore - VP, Immunology and Cell Biology MacroGenics, Inc. 7 th Annual World Bispecific Conference Boston Sept 29, 216

DART Bispecific Platform Highly robust bispecific platform Multiple applications across different disease areas Predictable manufacturability Long-term structural stability Ability to tailor half-life and valency Six DART molecules in clinical testing (1) Multiple pre-clinical programs advancing Significant validating DART collaborators Basic DART Crystallographic View (2) (1) Two clinical DART molecules are being developed by collaboration partners (MGD11/duvortuxizumab by Janssen and PF-66718 by Pfizer). (2) Crystallography of Pfizer s P-Cadherin x CD3 DART molecule. The two antigen binding sites (shown by red dot circles) are separated from each other by approximately 3 Å and are facing away from each other at an angle of approximately 9. Source: Root, et al., Antibodies 216, 5, 6; March 4, 216. 2 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

DART: Designed for Broad Range of Modalities 3 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

DART Formats Tailored for Different Applications Construct mab DART DART DART Specificity Monospecific Bispecific Bispecific Bispecific Valency Bivalent Bivalent Bivalent Tetravalent Half-life Days to weeks Hours Days to weeks Days to weeks Examples margetuximab, enoblituzumab, MGA12 MGD6 MGD7, MGD9, MGD1, MGD11 (duvortuxizumab), MGD14, PF-66718 MGD13 4 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

MGD1: Application of DART for Receptor Coligation Coligation of an activating receptor (CD79B; BCR component) with an inhibitory receptor (CD32B) on the same human B cell Designed to block B cell activation in a nondepleting manner and to selectively target activated B cells Alternative to depletion-based strategies (Rituximab) or BLyS antagonists (Belimumab) Monovalent co-engagement of each target to favor avidity-driven binding selectivity to B cells 5 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

CD32B and Its Involvement In Autoimmune Diseases Inhibitory regulator of both innate and adaptive immunity (only inhibitory FcgR) Expressed on leukocytes except for NK and T cells CD32B CD32B-KO mice fail to regulate humoral responses and develop lupus-like disease Checkpoint for B-cell activity maintaining humoral tolerance Allelic variant and expression level linked to autoimmune disease 6 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

B Cell Normal Physiological Negative Feedback Loop Antigen B Cell Receptor (BCR) 3 CD79B 4 2 CD32B A hallmark of autoimmune disease is B cell reactivity and activation against Self antigens Uncontrolled B cell activation 1 normally prevented by triggering of negative feedback loop Via engagement of CD32B (FcɣRIIb) 2 ITAM ITIM Triggered when BCR recognizes immunecomplexed antigen 3 and concomitant engagement of CD32B by the Fc domain of the complex bound IgG 4 Inhibition of the activation signal This shuts down expansion and activation of B cells reactive to self antigens 1 B-cell activation 7 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

Exploitation of Physiologic Inhibitory Pathway CD32B x CD79B DART-Mediated Negative Signaling Loop Antigen MGD1 recapitulates antigen driven proximity of activating (CD79B) and inhibitory (CD32B) receptors through co-ligation BCR CD79B CD32B ITAM ITIM B-cell activation Inhibition of the activation signal 8 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

Anti-DART Anti-DART Anti-DART SSC CD19 Anti-DART MGD1: B-cell Specific Binding MGD1 Binds Selectively to Human B-cells B-cells Saturation Curve Binding to B-cells CD45 Monocytes CD3 NK-cells CD19 T-cells CD14 CD16 CD3 EC 1 =.22±.15 µg/ml EC 2 =.51±.22 μg/ml 9 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

MGD1: Blocks B-cell Activation In Vitro Inhibition of BCR Activated Human B-cell Proliferation 1 2 2 5 1 2 3 H -T d R (c p m ) 8 6 3 H -T d R (c p m ) 1 5 1 4 M G D 1 h Ig G 1 A n ti-c D 3 2 B m A b 5 M G D 1 A n ti-c D 7 9 B C o n tr o l D A R T A n ti-c D 3 2 B C o n tr o l D A R T.2 7.8 2.5 7.4 2 2.2 6 6.7 2.8 2.5 7.4 2 2.2 6 6.7 2 C o n c e n tra tio n (n M ) C o n c e n tra tio n (n M ) Activity dependent on co-engagement of CD32B and CD79B 1 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

. MGD1: Inhibition of Autoimmune Patient B-cell Activation PE-Texas Red-H: CD19 PE-Texas Red-H % In h ib itio n CD19 CD32B CD79B CD79B and CD32B expression on peripheral B-cells isolated from SLE patient 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1.15 98.9 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 APC-H: ch2b6 APC-H PE-Texas Red-H: CD19 PE-Texas Red-H 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 2.65 97.4 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 PE-H: CD79b PE-H 1 In a c t iv e S L E ( n = 6 ) MGD1 ex-vivo inhibition of B-cells isolated from SLE patients with active or inactive disease status. 8 6 4 2 A c t iv e S L E ( n = 8 ) 11 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

h Ig M (E L IS A,n g /m L ) MGD1: Blocks B-cell Activation In Vivo Experiments performed in mice engrafted with human PBMC (Xenogeneic GVHD) h Ig M higg Inhibition of Ig Secretion 5 4 3 2 1 p =. 1 higg (ELISA,ng/mL) 16 12 8 4 p=.24 MGD 1 dosed IV: 1 µg/animal, q3d 2wk Serum Analyses: Day 7 P B S M G D 1 PBS MGD1 1 Inhibition of GVHD Cumulative Survival (%) 8 6 4 2 2 4 6 8 1 Days MGD1 (5. mg/kg) MGD1 (1. mg/kg) Rituximab (5. mg/kg) PBS MGD 1 dosed IV: q4d 9 12 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

R a tio MGD1: Prolonged PK and Absence of B-cell Depletion Dose escalation of MGD1 in cross-reactive non-human Primate TK prolonged and dose linear Prolonged B-cell occupancy Pre-Rx Day 28 MGD1 Binding to B-cells post 1mg/kg dose B -c e ll/t -c e ll R a tio.6 No B-cell depletion.4.2. 1 V e h 8 1 5 2 2 29 3 6 43 5 5 7 64 7 1 7 8 8 5 9 2 99 1 6 1 1 3 1 2 1 2 7 1 3 4 1 4 1 1 4 8 1 5 5 1 6 2.1 1. 1. 3. 1. E n d D a y s 13 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information 13

MGD1: Inhibition of BCR Signaling Target Occupancy and Ex-vivo BCR Activation following 1 mg/kg MGD1 Target Occupancy Ex-vivo B-Cell Ca ++ Flux Assay 1 4 8.35 91.7 1 4 1.7 89.3 Fluo-NW CD19 Fluo-NW Fluo-NW CD32B CD79B 15 GAH IgMµ- F(ab) 2 3 µg/ml Pre-Rx FL2-H: CD19 PE 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 FL1-H: ch8b5 A488 FL2-H: CD19 PE 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 FL4-H: CD79b APC 1 5 Pre-Rx 5 1 15 2 25 Time (sec.) 1 4 1 3 84.8 15.2 1 4 1 3 96 4.1 15 24 h 24 h FL2-H: CD19 PE 1 2 1 1 FL2-H: CD19 PE 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 FL1-H: ch8b5 A488 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 FL4-H: CD79b APB 5 5 1 15 2 25 Time (sec.) 1 4 8.2 19.8 1 4 72.3 27.7 Day 7 FL2-H: CD19 PE 1 3 1 2 FL2-H: CD19 PE 1 3 1 2 15 1 Day 7 1 1 1 1 14 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 FL1-H: ch8b5 A488 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 FL4-H: CD79b APC September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information 5 5 1 15 2 25 3 Time (sec.)

MGD1: Phase 1A Study Design Enrolled healthy volunteers in six escalation cohorts Healthy volunteers represent homogeneous population to ascertain safety and pharmacodynamics effects of MGD1 Eight subjects to enroll at each dose cohort Six subjects were treated with MGD1 and two were treated with Placebo Staggered dosing at each dose cohort to assess safety & tolerability Randomized 6 subjects in double-blind manner after treating two sentinel subjects with MGD1 Subject 1: (MGD1) Subject 2: (MGD1) 24-hr Subjects 3-8: (4 MGD1; 2 Placebo) 24-hr R Dose Cohort MGD1 Dose (mg/kg) 1.1 2.1 3.3 4 1. 5 3. 6 1. 15 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

MGD1: Phase 1A - Study Objectives Primary Objective Assess safety and tolerability of single dose of MGD1 in healthy adult subjects Secondary Objectives Evaluate single MGD1 dose pharmacokinetics Assess pharmacodynamics effects of MGD1 on humoral immune responses Evaluate potential anti-drug antibodies Exploratory Objectives Evaluate MGD1 binding to CD32B and CD79B on peripheral B cells Evaluate activation status of peripheral B cells and B-cell subsets Assess immune phenotype, including modulation of B-cell subsets Assess response of peripheral B cells to ex-vivo BCR stimulation 16 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

C o n c e n t r a t i o n ( n g / m l ) % o f M a x B i n d i n g ( m e a n s e m ) MGD1: Human PK and Circulating B-cell Occupancy MGD1 Serum Levels B-cell Occupancy 1 1 1 8 1 1 1 1 6 4 2 1 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 3 5 4 2 4 9 5 6 Days D a y s 6 h 1 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 3 5 4 2 4 9 5 6 Days D a y s MGD1 Dosing: Placebo.1mg/kg.1mg/kg.3mg/kg 1 mg/kg 3 mg/kg 1 mg/kg MGD1 serum concentrations increase linearly with dose Half-life: ~8 days at 1mg/kg Maximum B-cell occupancy at doses 1 mg/kg Sustained receptor occupancy beyond one week at doses 1 mg/kg 17 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

C e l l s / L ( m e a n s e m ) R a t i o ( m e a n s e m ) MGD1: No Evidence of B-cell Depletion Longitudinal Analyses of Peripheral Immune Cells Absolute B-cell Counts B/T Ratio 4. 5 3. 4. 3 2. 2 1. 1 6 h 1 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 3 5 4 2 4 9 5 6 Days D a y s. 1 1. 2 5 2 8 1 5 2 2 2 9 3 6 4 3 5 5 7 D a y s Placebo MGD1 Dosing:.1mg/kg.1mg/kg 1 mg/kg 3 mg/kg.3mg/kg 1 mg/kg 18 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

S t i m u l a t e d B C e l l s / I o n o m y c i n ( m e a n s e m ) Treatment with MGD1 Inhibited B-Cell Activation R e la t i v e P e a k R e s p o n s e Relative Peak Response. 2. 1 Placebo 1 mg/kg 3 mg/kg 1 mg/kg MGD1 Dosing. 1 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 Days s p<.1; p<.1 (Student s t-test compared to placebo) PBMCs from enrolled subjects collected longitudinally after MGD1 treatment Ca 2+ flux (hallmark of B-cell activation) induced ex vivo by B-cell receptor ligation using anti-igm Data normalized to maximum Ca 2+ permeability (maximum induction) via ionomycin Dose dependent B-cell inhibition demonstrated with increasing doses of MGD1 Inhibition sustained for several weeks at highest dose levels 19 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

R e l a t i v e M F I ( % o f T i m e Z e r o, m e a n s e m ) % c h a n g e % c h a n g e R e l a t i v e M F I ( % o f T i m e Z e r o, m e a n s e m ) % c h a n g e MGD1 Modulated Cell Surface BCR and Serum Ig Levels CD27 - Naïve B Cells CD27 + Memory B Cells MGD1 Down-Regulation of Cell Surface Ig Expression 1 4 1 2 1 8 6 4 2 1 4 1 2 1 8 6 4 2 1 1 migdm I g D Dose-dependent down modulation of cell surface BCR expression on both naïve and memory B cells 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 Days D a y s miggm I g G 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 Days a y s p<.5 (Paired t-test compared to baseline) 1 2 1 8 6 4 2 MGD1 Modulation of Circulating Serum Ig Levels 1 2 1 8 6 4 2 Serum S e r u m IIgG g G 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 3 5 4 2 4 9 5 6 Days D a y s S e r u m I g M 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 3 5 4 2 4 9 5 6 Placebo Serum IgM Days D a y s 1 2 1 8 6 4 2 Serum S e r u m IIgA g A 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 3 5 4 2 4 9 5 6 Days D a y s MGD1 Dosing: 1 mg/kg 3 mg/kg 1 mg/kg 2 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

MGD1 Impacts Naïve & Mature B-cells Bone Marrow Periphery Stem Cell Pro B-cell Pre B-Cell Immature B-Cell Naïve B-Cell Mature B-Cell Cytoplasmic µ + Surface Surface Surface IgM + & IgD + IgM + & IgD + IgM+, IgG + & IgD + Memory B-Cell Surface IgG + & IgA + = CD32B = CD79B = Immunoglobulin Plasmablast Cytoplasmic IgM + Plasma Cell Cytoplasmic IgG + A single MGD1 dose: Modulates naïve and mature B-cell signal transduction via signaling blockade and/or down-regulation of surface Ig Decreases serum IgM levels, suggesting an impact on plasmablasts Lack of CD79B expression on plasma cells is consistent with no effect on other serum Ig 21 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

M F I (m e a n S E M ) M F I (m e a n S E M ) MGD1 Mediates Reduction of B-cell CD4 Expression CD4 Expression C D 4 E x p r e s s i o n HLA-DR Expression H L A - D R E x p r e s s i o n 5 2 5 4 2 1 5 1 3 2 1 6 h 1 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 3 5 4 2 4 9 5 6 Days D a y s p<.5 (Paired t-test compared to baseline) 6 h 1 Placebo 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 3 5 4 2 4 9 5 6 Days D a y s MGD1 Dosing: 1 mg/kg 3 mg/kg 1 mg/kg MGD1 has potential impact on B-cell : T-cell interactions Decreased cell surface expression of CD4, a B cell co-stimulatory molecule No effect on other cell surface markers observed HLA-DR (as shown), CD8/86, CD69, CD25 22 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

Summary of Phase 1a Clinical Experience MGD1 is well tolerated as single dose up to 1 mg/kg in healthy subjects No B-cell activation or cytokine release No depletion of peripheral B cells Peripheral B-cells saturated at 1mg/kg dose levels with sustained receptor occupancy with increasing doses MGD1 down-modulated B-cell function at multiple levels Reduction in BCR-induced Ca2+ mobilization Decreased surface Ig expression both naïve and memory B-cells Decreased serum IgM levels, suggesting an impact on plasmablasts Data supports continued development of MGD1 in patients with autoimmune disorders 23 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

DART Platform Applications in HIV Cure Challenge Proposed Strategy Current combination antiretroviral therapy (cart) cannot eradicate HIV infection Latency: the presence of integrated but transcriptionally quiet proviral DNA, primarily within central memory T cell population, makes the infected cells invisible to immune system Chronically infected individuals generally experience rapid viral rebound after cart interruption (usually within weeks) Latency-reversing agent (LRA) to reactivate HIV antigen expression Shock-and-Kill lysis Env Goal CD3 To reduce or eliminate HIV latent reservoirs T cells 24 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

L U M (R L U ) T u m o r V o lu m e (m m 3 ) R a n d o m. P B M C s T u m o r C e lls DART: Potent T-cell mediated Target Cell Elimination Example: MGD11 (CD19 x CD3) 3 V e h ic le 2 5 C o n t r o l D A R T (.5 m g / k g ) 2 1 5 1 5 A v g T u m o r V o l. 5 4 1 m m 3 A v g T u m o r V o l. 1 9 1 m m 3 L a r g e r T u m o r G r o u p S m a lle r T u m o r G r o u p Anti-Tumor Activity 7 1 4 2 1 2 8 3 5 4 2 R x Treatment of B-cell lymphoma (HBL-2) in human T-cell reconstituted mice 1 8 6 4 2 Redirected T-cell Killing CD19+Raji + PBMC (E:T = 31:1) M G D 1 1 C D 1 9 -B it E C o n tro l M P 3 D A R T Inguinal Lymph Node Mandibular Lymph Node, Spleen CD2 CD2 CD2 CD2 Profound B-cell Depletion in Lymphoid Organs (NHP) 1-1 1-8 1-6 1-4 1-2 1 1 2 C o n c e n tra tio n (n M ) Liu et al., 216 Clinical Cancer Research (In press) Control MGD11 25 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information 25

Broadly Reactive Anti-Env Antibodies and Their Targets Mature Env trimer V1-V2 loop PGT145 CD4-binding site VRC1 C1-C4 (gp12 cluster A) A32 Glycan-V3 loop PGT121 gp41 cluster I 7B2 Broadly Neutralizing PGT121 PGT145 VRC1 1E8 gp41 MPER 1E8 Non-Neutralizing, ADCC-mediating A32 7B2 Adapted from Euler Front Immunol 212 Variant Env structures (legitimate targets on infected cells) Mature trimer Uncleaved gp16 trimer gp41 stump (gp12 shedding) Alternate trimer gp12/gp41 monomers 26 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

HIV X CD3 Molecules Mediate Potent CTL Activity Env+ Jurkat-522 F/Y cells (targets), pan-t-cells (effectors), cytolysis by LDH release assay EC5 ~15 pg/ml (~3 pm) Sung et al. 215 J Clin Invest 27 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

DART Molecule-mediated CTL Activity Against HIV-Infected CD4+ Cells Resting CD4+ T cells infected with HIV-1; CD8+ T cells (E:T 2:1); assay p24+ CD4+ cells HIV-1 RW/92/8 (subtype A) HIV-1 BaL (subtype B) HIV-1 IN/93/95 (subtype C) High potency HIV DARTs A32, 7B2, PGT121, PGT145 Low potency HIV DARTs VRC1, 1E8 8 28 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information Sloan et al. 215 PLOS Pathogens

HIV Clearance in Resting CD4 Cells Reactivated By LRA HIV pt on ART PBMC Resting CD4 + cells, culture with ARVs (24h) CD8 + cells + VOR (6h) ± DART (24-96h) E:T = 1:1 Allogeneic HIV - donor cells to amplify virus (15 days) p24+ wells (QVOA) HIV DART molecule-mediated virus clearance in 4 of 4 patients (longer time needed for Pt 795) 14 29 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information Sung et al. 215 J Clin Invest

MGD14: HIV x CD3 DART Candidate Targeted Indication Development Partner Humanized HIV x CD3 Fc-bearing DART (extended PK) HIV arm based on a broadly reactive, ADCC-mediating, nonneutralizing anti-env antibody Elimination of latent HIV infection in combination with latencyreversing agents and anti-retroviral therapy (ART) Preclinical activities ongoing Initial GMP production completed IND targeted for 1H:217 MacroGenics retains worldwide commercial rights Funded through NIAID (NIH) contract awarded 9/15/15 In collaboration with Duke/UNC 3 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information

MG Pipeline of Product Candidates Clinical-stage programs Program (Target) Indication Pre-IND Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Partner Our Commercial Rights ONCOLOGY margetuximab (HER2) Breast (HER2+) SOPHIA Green Cross Worldwide, except Breast (low HER2) South Korea Gastric (+pembrolizumab) enoblituzumab (B7-H3) Solid Tumors (mono.) Worldwide Solid Tumors (+ipi.) Solid Tumors (+pembro.) MGD6 (CD123 x CD3) AML/MDS Servier North America, Japan, South Korea, India MGD7 (gpa33 x CD3) Colorectal MGD11 (CD19 x CD3) B-cell Malignancies Janssen U.S. Co-promote MGD9 (B7-H3 x CD3) Solid Tumors Worldwide MGA12 Solid Tumors/Heme Worldwide MGD13 (PD-1 x LAG-3) Solid Tumors/Heme Worldwide AUTOIMMUNE & INFECTIOUS DISEASES teplizumab (CD3) Type 1 Diabetes Prev. NIDDK/NIH Worldwide MGD1 (CD32B x CD79B) Autoimmune Disorders Worldwide MGD14 (HIV x CD3) HIV NIAID/NIH Worldwide MacroGenics has option to fund late-stage development in exchange for U.S. and Canada profit share. DART mab 31 September 29, 216/Company Proprietary Information