FDA 510(k) 101 The Basics

Similar documents
510(k) submissions. Getting US FDA clearance for your device: Improving

Use of Standards in Substantial Equivalence Determinations

Preparing a US FDA Medical Device 510(K) Submission

Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intraoral Devices for Snoring and/or Obstructive Sleep Apnea; Guidance for Industry and FDA

Regulatory Submission Strategies and Outlines For Ultrasonic Surgical Devices: Contact and HIFU Systems UIA Symposium Ronald R.

510(k) Summary. BioStructures, LLC. Interface Bone Void Filler

July 10, X-spine Systems, Incorporated David Kirschman, MD Chief Medical Officer 452 Alexandersville Road Miamisburg, Ohio 45342

January 7, Dear Ms. Chung:

BEST PRACTICE CHANGE CONTROL : DECIDING WHEN TO SUBMIT A 510(K) FOR A DEVICE CHANGE. Yuan Xu 18- JAN- 2018

K Michael Kolber Regulatory Affairs

O(K) SUMMARY. Mega'Gen Co., Ltd , Eupchun-Ri, Jain-Myun. Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk South Korea Phone: , Fax:

Ko0 -t. Exhibit 2 MAY 3 0? 510 (K) Summay. Company Name: Columbia Scientific Development, LLC 420 NW I Ith Ave., Suite 617 Portland, Oregon 97209

Donald W. Guthner Orgenix, LLC Ill Hill Road. Douglassville, PA (888) ORGENIX ( ) (484) (FAX) Intramedullary Nails, Nails

March 8, DxNow, Inc. Kevin Sly Senior Advisor to DxNow, Inc. 401 Professional Drive, Suite 130 Gaithersburg, Maryland

DEC (k) Summary. X-spine Systems, Inc Corporate Way #212 Centerville, OH Telephone (800) FAX (866)

ANDA Arthur P. Bedrosian, President Armenpharm, Ltd. 49 South Ridge Road P.O. Box D1400 Pomona, NY December 3, 2015

510(k) 21 Summary of Safety and Effectiveness

The proposed rule is significant, and the requirements and exceptions are complex. Key provisions of the proposal are described below.

U. AUG skeletal dynamics. 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Skeletal Dynamics Geminus Volar Distal Radius Plate System

ko~ Tk (K) SUMMARY

SNuVASivE: 51. 0(k) Premarket Notification Long Lateral Spinal System

February 15, AtriCure, Inc. Melissa Smallwood Regulatory Affairs Specialist 7555 Innovation Way Mason, Ohio 45040

Bacterin International Incorporated Mr. Howard L. Schrayer 600 Cruiser Lane Belgrade, Montana August 18, 2015

Mobile Medical Devices Final Project Assignment Submittal of the MMDA 510(k)

/tj7-0zq0 510 (k) Summary P

510(K) SUMMARY. Ventus Medical, Inc Shoreway Road, Suite 340 Belmont, CA Menlo Park, CA (650) (phone) (650) (fax)

March 19, Dear Ms. Strohkirch:

Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff

NOV Jo 6) ' 510(k) Summary

510(k) SUMMARY (Per 21 CFR ) MAY

TELEMED. November 3, Engineering Manager Dariaus ir Gireno str. 42 Vilnius, LT LITHUANIA

February 15, AtriCure, Inc. Melissa Smallwood Regulatory Affairs Specialist 7555 Innovation Way Mason, Ohio 45040

,,~ 30! Premarket Notification - SomnoMed MAS Flex "S"

NEURONETICS. 510(k) SUMMARY NEUROSTAR TMS THERAPY SYSTEM'

510(k) Summary. Acumed, LLC 5885 NW Cornelius Pass Road Hillsboro, OR 97124

Dear Cecilia Ceng: U.S. Food & Drug Administration New Hampshire Avenue Doc ID# Silver Spring, MD

Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.

5101K] SUMMARY [as required by (c)]

510(k) SUMMARY. Bristol, PA President. PhysioFlow Q-Link. Classification Name: Impedance plethysmograph (21 CER 870.

Contact [UlS agent: Dong Guk Ha. April Lee MegaGenImplant Co., Ltd.

510(k) SUMMARY STATEMEMT. Mettler Traction Device, MTD 4000 OCT Mettler Electronics Corp South Claudina Street Anaheim, CA 92805

SECTION 2. SUMMARY AND CERTIFICATION

Responsibilities of Laser Light Show Projector Manufacturers, Dealers, and Distributors; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA.

SECTION 2. SUMMARY AND CERTIFICATIOIov

TOBACCO PRODUCT OR MEDICAL PRODUCT?

MAY Page 1 of 2

September 28, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Attention: Scott D. Tomsky Vice President, US Generics Regulatory Affairs 425 Privet Road Horsham, PA 19044

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting public input on updated

Three-Month Extension of Certain Tobacco Product Compliance Deadlines Related to the

Section III 510(k) Summary

TISSUELINKO., Simply Better Surgery TM

SPINE. 510(k) Summary. Anterior/anterolateral noncervical use (KWQ) (Prodct Cde):Noncervical

Introduction. Current status of 510(k) clinical data requirements. 1 Current Status&Considerations:

Medidée Services SA. Nano-Tera.ch. 05 February 2015 part 4. Intro ISO GMP - GLP Pierre-Alain Sommer

Instrument, Surgical, Powered, Laser 79-GEX 21I CFR878-48

TSDR Pharmacy Inc. dba brandmd Skin Care 11/9/17

Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: External Penile Rigidity Devices

Overview of the Legal Framework for Medical Device Regulation in the United States

Classification Name, Classification Number, Class, Classification Reference: 74BWS I DSK I DXN I

Guidance for Industry

ANDA Submissions Refuse to Receive for Lack of Proper Justification of Impurity Limits Guidance for Industry

Primer: Medical Device User Fee Amendments Han Zhong l September 2011

April 30, By Electronic Mail

International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science

General Wellness: Policy for Low Risk Devices Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

Standards of Conduct for Transmission Providers

Labeling for Permanent Hysteroscopically-Placed Tubal Implants Intended for Sterilization

FDA s 510(k) Working Group

Talon Compounding Pharmacy 10/3/17

Strengthening the Center for Devices and Radiological Health s 510(k) Review Process February 18, 2010


NDA NDA APPROVAL

Planning For The FDA s 'Deeming Rule' For E- Cigarettes

Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Toxicology Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory

FDLI s Enforcement, Litigation, and Compliance Conference. Center for Tobacco Products Office of Compliance and Enforcement 2017 Update

Our medtech experts are yours. 510(k)s for Connected Medical Devices.

In Vitro Diagnostic Testing for Direct Oral Anticoagulants- Premarket Review

Introduction to Product Regulation Under the Family Smoking Prevention & Tobacco Control Act

RE: Permits under the Arizona Pharmacy Act should not be required for dietary supplements

FDA Regulation of Diagnostic Tests Jeffrey N. Gibbs Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. Washington, DC

Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012; Regulatory Science Initiatives; Public Hearing;

The Tobacco Control Act s Premarket Review Authorities: Reports on Substantial Equivalence and Exemption Requests (905(j))

UNITED STATES REGULATION OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS. Presented by Mitch Zeller Center Director FDA Center for Tobacco Products

Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing Intervention--Exploring a Strategy for

INRANGE SYSTEMS. Citizen Petition

Guidance - IDE Early/Expanded Access for Devices

Comments of the Patient, Consumer, and Public Health Coalition. Strengthening the Center for Devices and Radiological Health s 510(k) Review Process

Withdrawal of Proposed Rule on Supplemental Applications Proposing Labeling Changes for

MAR (k) SUMMARY. Stanmore Implants Worldwide Ltd JTS Extendible Implant Preparation Date: March 17, A ppl ica nt/spo0nsor:

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget

Effective and Compliance Dates Applicable to Retailers, Manufacturers, Importers, and Distributors of Newly Deemed Tobacco Products

Using and Referencing ISO and IEC Standards for Technical Regulation

Key CDRH Regulatory Initiatives

Safety Evaluation for Substances Directly Added to Food

WCPT Subgroups. Information Pack: September 2011

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Preface

Medicare Part D Overutilization Monitoring System

Transcription:

FDA 510(k) 101 The Basics Floyd G. Larson President, PaxMed International San Diego, CA OMTEC June 17, 2010 Chicago Agenda History of 510(k) process FDA s risk based approach FDA guidance and standards Structure of a 510(k) Submission to FDA Follow up with FDA History of 510(k) Program Began May 28, 1976 Medical device amendments to Federal Food Drug & Cosmetic Act ( the Act ) Section 510(k) of the Act Initial regulation of medical devices Grandfathered devices already on market, if risk low (Class I or II) Pre amendments devices New devices cleared if substantially equivalent to devices on market prior to May 28, 1976 Now can be SE to devices that are SE 1

2 Section 510(k) of the Act (k) Each person who is required to register under this section and who proposes to begin the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce for commercial distribution of a device intended for human use shall, at least ninety days before making such introduction or delivery, report to the Secretary or person who is accredited under section 523(a) (in such form and manner as the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe) (1) the class in which hthe device is classified under section 513 or if such person determines that the device is not classified under such section, a statement of that determination and the basis for such person's determination that the device is or is not so classified, and (2) action taken by such person to comply with requirements under section 514 [performance standards] or 515 [premarket approval] which are applicable to the device.... Premarket Notification Original 510(k) process involved sending FDA a letter indicating intent to introduce new device into interstate commerce If no response within 90 days, OK to sell Soon changed to require that a favorable letter from FDA be received prior to marketing Review process now much more rigorous Mini PMA An early 510(k)

3 Here it is all 6 pages The beginning of the content This is all there is!

How are things different now? 510(k)s may have 200 500 pages (or more) Solid predicate device(s) are essential Need carefully considered Indications for Use Need strong supporting data Performance testing bench Performance testing animal Performance testing clinical A growing number of submissions Need strong Substantial Equivalence argument Risk based Classification Three Regulatory Classes (level of control based on risk): Class I General Controls (most exempt from 510(k)) Class II General Controls & Special Controls (Guidance Documents, Standards) Class III General Controls & Premarket Approval What is Class III? FDA has determined that Special Controls are not sufficient to ensure safety and effectiveness Class III devices generally are not eligible for 510(k) clearance (need Premarket Approval) Exception for Preamendments Class III devices for which FDA has not yet issued a call for Premarket Approval applications 4

Devices Exempt from 510(k) Preamendments devices Unfinished devices Devices exempt by statute or by regulation 739 Class I, 74 Class II Finished devices not sold in U.S. Devices covered under another 510(k) Private labeled devices Custom devices Veterinary devices Is a 510(k) needed? Is it a Medical Device? Is it exempt from 510(k) requirement? Note that it probably is subject to QSR 21CFR 820 Is it a PMA device? Types of 510(k)s Class II and Preamendments Class III Traditional 90 day review Special Rli Relies on Design Controls 30 day review Abbreviated Relies on conformance to standards 5

Special 510(k) Used to obtain clearance for a change to a manufacturers own device Same Indication for Use Based on conformance to Design Controls (21CFR 820.30) Submission not easier than Traditional Review time 30 days See FDA guidance at www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm080189.pdf Abbreviated 510(k) Based on conformance to standards and/or FDA guidance documents No advantage for review timing Not commonly used Standards are also used in Traditional 510(k)s Role of Standards Voluntary Organizations such as ASTM, ISO Voting process ASTM by company or individual, ISO by country Recognized by FDA (see FDA recognition list) www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfstandards/ search.cfm Even when they are not performance standards, they are useful in aiding comparison to historical data or predicate devices 6

Substantial Equivalence A device is substantially equivalent if, in comparison to a predicate it: has the same intended use as the predicate; and has the same technological characteristics as the predicate; or has the same intended use as the predicate; and has different technological characteristics and the information submitted to FDA; does not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness; and demonstrates that the device is at least as safe and effective as the legally marketed device. 510(k) Review Flowchart 510(k) Review Flowchart 7

8 Reviewer Template for 510(k) Reviewer Template for 510(k) Reviewer Template for 510(k)

9 Reviewer Template for 510(k) Reviewer Template for 510(k) Reviewer Template for 510(k)

10 What does the 510(k) process accomplish (and what not)? Outcome of 510(k) review determines classification of a device If Substantially Equivalent ( SE ) SE) takes classification of predicate If Not Substantially Equivalent ( NSE ), device is Class III 510(k) clearance is not approval That requires the Premarket Approval (PMA) process A 510(k) is not registration or device listing Nuts andbolts Beginning the Submission Define intended use of device Search for FDA guidance documents FDA database of guidance documents Determine classification FDA database of product codes Look at product codes of similar devices (510(k) summaries) Read classification regulation Search for predicate device candidates Same intended use and product code Similar technological characteristics Multiple predicate devices OK Collect key components

Key Components Product list with part numbers for all products to be cleared, including all relevant accessories Engineering drawings for all components on product list Device Description especially characteristicsnot obvious from the drawings (e.g., description of surface treatment and process used) Material Certifications or Material Standards acceptable to FDA Key Components Labeling copies or drafts Instructions for Use (Package Insert) In English Product Labels, with text for most symbols Surgical and/or Prosthetic Manuals Product Brochures List of all claims for which clearance is requested Key Components Packaging description and drawings Planned sterilization method and validation plans including corresponding accepted FDA standard Testing completed (including protocol or standard to which the protocol is written, and final test reports) 11

12 Format of a Traditional 510(k) FDA Guidance August 12, 2005 21 sections Some may not apply Maintain numbering and titles Sections of a 510(k) Cover Page Table of Contents 1. Medical Device User Fee Cover Sheet (Form FDA 3601) 2. CDRH Premarket Review Submission Cover Sheet 3. 510(k) Cover Letter 4. Indications for Use Statement 5. 510(k) Summary or 510(k) Statement 6. Truthful and Accurate Statement 7. Class III Summary and Certification Sections of a 510(k) 8. Financial Certification or Disclosure Statement 9. Declarations of Conformity and Summary Reports Include Standards Data Reports (Form FDA 3654) for each standard referenced in submission 10 Executive Summary 10. Executive Summary 11. Device Description 12. Substantial Equivalence Discussion 13. Proposed Labeling

13 Sections of a 510(k) 14. Sterilization and Shelf Life 15. Biocompatibility 16. Software 17. Electromagnetic Compatibility and Electrical Safety 18. Performance Testing Bench 19. Performance Testing Animal 20. Performance Testing Clinical 21. Other Steps in Writing a 510(k) Write Device Description Summarize bench testing Summarize animal testing (if applicable) Summarize clinical study (if applicable) Write text for other sections Biocompatibility Sterilization and shelf life (include packaging) Write Substantial Equivalence section Steps in Writing a 510(k) Complete administrative sections FDA User Fee Cover Sheet CDRH Cover Sheet 510(k) Cover Letter Indications for Use Statement Indications for Use Statement 510(k) Summary or 510(k) Statement Truthful and Accurate Statement Class III Summary and Certification (if applicable) Financial Certification or Disclosure Statement (if applicable) Declarations of Conformity and Summary Reports Executive Summary Certification re clinical trials databank (if applicable)

14 Submitting the 510(k) Submit TWO paper copies or ONE paper copy and ONE electronic (pdf) copy If electronic copy is submitted, see for format http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/howtomarketyourdevice/premarketsubmissions/ucm134508.htm Include MS Word file of text for reviewer use Retain an identical file copy Use 8.5 inch x 11 inch paper 3 hole punch left margin Your fancy binder will be discarded (probably used for employee children s school projects) Use 8.5 Complete administrative sections FDA User Fee Cover Sheet CDRH Cover Sheet 510(k) Cover Letter Indications for Use Statement 510(k) Summary or 510(k) Statement Truthful and Accurate Statement Class III Summary and Certification (if applicable) Financial Certification or Disclosure Statement (if applicable) Declarations of Conformity and Summary Reports Executive Summary Certification re clinical trials databank (if applicable) Submitting the 510(k) Submit by traceable courier service to: Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health Document Mail Center WO66 G609 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993 0002 0002 For 510(k)s reviewed by CBER, send to: FDA/CBER 1401 Rockville Pike HFM 99, Room 200N Rockville, MD 20852 1448 What s Next? Administrative review for completeness FDA acknowledgement letter Includes assigned K number not a clearance FDA has 90 calendar days to review a Traditional 510(k) Premarket Notification i Target for questions is 75 days FDA has 30 days to review a Special 510(k) Reviewer may call sponsor or consultant with questions If questions can be resolved easily, a hold might be avoided

15 What s Next? Questions may come by email, FAX or letter (request for additional information AI Letter) Submission will be placed on hold Stops FDA 90 day clock Starts sponsor 30 day clock Et Extensions automatically ti granted tdon request, to a total t of 180 days When sponsor submits response to questions, FDA clock starts running again FDA might ask a second round of formal questions Submission will be placed on hold Stops FDA 90 day clock Starts sponsor 30 day clock Extensions automatically granted on request, to a total of 180 days What s Next? Generally no opportunity for third round of questions If all questions answered satisfactorily Substantially Equivalent letter Clearance to market If reviewer and FDA management not satisfied Not Substantially Equivalent letter Device is Class III Some NSE letters read more like AI letters Invite resubmission as 510(k) with additional information Usually requires clinical or animal data Questions?

16 Key FDA website links Classification database www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpcd/classification.cfm 510(k) database www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm Guidance document database www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/ GuidanceDocuments/default.htm Device Advice www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/default.htm Key FDA Guidance (General) Format for Abbreviated & Traditional 510(k)s www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/ GuidanceDocuments/ucm084396.pdf Certifications re clinical trials databank www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm125335.htm User Fees and Rf Refunds for 510(k)s www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/ GuidanceDocuments/ucm089755.pdf Bundling Multiple Devices or Multiple Indications in a Single Submission www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/ GuidanceDocuments/ucm089732.pdf To contact us Floyd Larson or Kevin Thomas PaxMed International, LLC Office (858) 792 1235 Email flarson@paxmed.com kthomas@paxmed.com