Annie J. Sasco, MD, MPH, MS, DrPH

Similar documents
Page 1. diagnosed in the elderly it tends to hide increases in specific groups).

biological agents volume 100 B A review of human carcinogens iarc monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans

The International EMF Collaborative s Counter-View of the Interphone Study

International EMF Policy Developments

The WHO International EMF Project: The road ahead

IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. VOLUME 93 Carbon Black, Titanium Dioxide, and Talc

IARC Research Actions on Radiofrequencies

Epidemiology of Cell Phones and Other Wireless Transmitting Devices, an Update

Brain Cancer Discussion (EMERG)

Mobile Phones, Brain Tumours and the Interphone Study: Where Are We Now?

We have definitive evidence for biological effects at low RF exposure.!

Health Risks Assessment A WHO perspective. Dr E. van Deventer

Trends in cancer in the world. Alliance of prevention and precaution for childhood cancer control. Why is cancer increasing?

2B: possibly carcinogenic to humans! A communication challenge

Radiofrequency Exposure and Human Health

EVOLUTION OF ICNIRP GUIDELINES

Wireless Radiation in Schools - Fact Sheet and Directives

WHO Research Agenda for RF fields

This is the published version of a paper published in International Journal of Oncology.

Health Canada Roles and Responsibilities - Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) and Safety Code 6

Highlight News. Health risks from mobile phone radiation why the experts disagree

Cancer Association of South Africa (CANSA) Fact Sheet and Position Statement on Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields

Policy Setting Considerations

EU-Funded Research on EMF and Health'

16 January 2014 STATEMENT WITH REGARD TO HEALTH DANGERS FROM SMART METERS

Don t panic, mobile phones are still only as carcinogenic as pickles

MOBI-Kids - Risk of brain cancer from exposure to radiofrequency fields in childhood and adolescence. Elisabeth Cardis, CREAL, Barcelona

The carcinogenicity of benzene. The IARC Monograph Vol 120. Kurt Straif, MD MPH PhD. PSA, Stavanger, 25 October 2018

OBJECTION against 5 new BTS sites in Ludwigsdorf. Antennas near homes: Increased cancer risk

CHILDREN AND HEALTH RISKS OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS

Dennis and Sharon Noble Monday, May 30, :18 PM

Section 1. Executive Summary

Health Canada Roles and Responsibilities - Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) and Safety Code 6

Are mobile phones safe for children to use?

The Possible Harmful Biological Effects of Low Level Electromagnetic Fields of Frequencies up to 300 GHz. IEE Position Statement - May 2002

Power Frequency and Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields

The Precautionary Principle should be Invoked for RF-EMF

Discussion of Changes in the Draft Preamble

Partial Results of NTP Chronic Carcinogenicity Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Rats

Long-term use of cellular phones and brain tumors: increased risk associated with use for 10 years

EMF Health Watch: Children, Cell Phones, Cancer. New Report Underscores Serious Concerns.

Communications towers are commonplace. RF Fields in and surrounding the schools will be far below US exposure limits

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans PREAMBLE

On the association between glioma, wireless phones, heredity and ionising radiation

OPINION of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety

IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans IARC Monograph Evaluations

L. HARDELL, N. CARLBERG, F. SEDERQVIST, K.H. MILD

The JNCI Study by Aydin et al on Risk of Childhood Brain Cancer from Cellphone Use Reveals Serious Health Problems

Radiofrequency Radiation

Presumptive Diseases and Workers Compensation Laws

Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Volume VIII

FULL SIGNAL Documentary on Cell Phone & Wireless Hazards

Yes, there really are health risks from wireless radiation exposure! VOTE NO ON SB 649!

O ver the past few decades, there has been rapid worldwide

RF and Health: A WHO Perspective

Glyphosate and Cancer Risk. Jeffrey Jenkins, Ph.D. Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology Oregon State University

The Cellular companies and the Health Organizations do everything to hide the truth from us: The cellular causes cancer.

Scientific Council Fifty-first Session 21/11/2014

Smokeless Tobacco Use in the US Military

Cellular Telephone Use and Cancer. Recently, there has been concern that the use of hand-held cellular telephones may be

Classifying Foods as Carcinogenic? A Case Study of Red and Processed Meats.

Submission to Honourable Rona Ambrose Minister of Health. Re: Health Canada consultation on proposed revisions to Safety Code 6.

Comments DRAFT Preamble to the IARC Monograph. Health and Safety Department International Union, UAW 8000 East Jefferson Avenue Detroit, MI 48214

DANGEROUS GOODS PANEL (DGP)

Mobile phone use has increased with extraordinary rapidity,

RF and Health: A WHO Perspective

Recent Results from the IARC Monographs: Carcinogenicity of Consuming Red & Processed Meat, Coffee and Very Hot Beverages

CONTENTS NOTE TO THE READER... 1

Indoor Radon A public health perspective

Air pollution as a major risk factor for cancer

Electromagnetic Fields and Cancer: The Cost of Doing Nothing

Supplementary Online Content

Volume 10 Cervix Cancer Screening

Health Sciences Practice. Health Evaluation of Exposure to Radiofrequency Energy from AM Radio Antennas

CELL PHONE RADIATION AND HEALTH: STRESS RESPONSE, PROTEOMICS, BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER AND OTHER SELECTED ISSUES

Why the Precautionary Approach is needed for Non-Ionising Radiation Devices

News from the NTP Study Franz Adlkofer

RESOURCE GUIDE Scheduling Meetings and Educating U.S. Congressional Representatives

Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study

Carcinogenicity of Glyphosate The IARC Monographs. Dana Loomis PhD Deputy Head Monographs Programme

Power Lines and Health: The Evidence and Public Policy

Conclusions of the BioInitiative Report. Michael Kundi Medical University of Vienna BioInitiative Organizing Committee

CONTENTS NOTE TO THE READER...1 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS...3

ESTIMATES OF THE FRACTION OF SEVERAL CANCERS ATTRIBUTABLE TO OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO SOME CARCINOGENS IN FRANCE

A position regarding the use of Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation, including WiFi, in the workplace. OECTA Provincial Health and Safety Committee

pharmaceuticals volume 100 A A review of human carcinogens iarc monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans

Submission to Canadian House of Commons Standing Committee on Health. Evidence Indicates Plausible Link between Autism and RF Radiation Exposure

Library of ALCOHOL HEALTH WARNING LABELS

12 CANCER Epidemiology Methodological considerations

Philippe AUTIER, MD, MPH

fetuses. Their concern is also for children whose brains and organs do not fully mature until age 21.

WIRELESS RADIATION AND HEALTH

DRAFT Preamble to the IARC Monographs

Donate. Cellular Phone Towers

EME UPDATE. Mobile telecommunications health and safety news > > > > > > EDITORIAL LARGEST EVER RESEARCH RESULTS ON MOBILES AND CANCER EXPECTED SOON

Methodological Aspects of Epidemiological Studies on the Use of Mobile Phones and their Association with Brain Tumors

:i iiii ï {:] liii M1!11111[.1i

E/2001/23 E/CN.4/2001/167. COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT ON THE FIFTY-SEVENTH SESSION (19 March - 27 April 2001) ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL

Transcription:

Annie J. Sasco, MD, MPH, MS, DrPH Emerita Director of Research, Epidemiology for Cancer Prevention, Inserm U 1219 (French NIH National Institute of Health and Medical Research), Bordeaux University, France Past IARC-WHO Unit Chief, with international teaching responsibilities, and international expert on EMF and Cancer

IARC Classifies Cell Phone Radiation and other wireless radiation as a Possible Human Carcinogen, 2011 Annie J. Sasco, MD, MPH, MS, DrPH Emerita Director of Research, Epidemiology for Cancer Prevention, Inserm U 1219 (French NIH National Institute of Health and Medical Research), Bordeaux University, France Past IARC-WHO Unit Chief, with international teaching responsibilities, and international expert on EMF and Cancer The opinions expressed in this talk are solely those of the speaker (AJS) and should not be considered as official positions of the Inserm, IARC-WHO or the University

International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Part of the World Health Organization (WHO) as the specialized cancer agency Coordinates and conducts both epidemiological and laboratory research into the causes of human cancer. Goal: study cancer with an aim at prevention

The IARC program of Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans Initiated in 1969 at IARC, by Dr. Tomatis and with support of the NCI (United States of America) and the European Commission Objective: To prepare, with the help of international working groups of experts, and to publish in the form of monographs : Critical reviews of the literature Evaluation of evidence on the carcinogenicity of a wide range of human exposures

Monographs Meeting Structure Invited Experts Secretariat Subgroups Exposure Epidemiology Animal Carcinogenicity Other Plenary Discussions Relevant Data Invited Experts Only Evaluation

Summary of Reported Data a. Exposure data b. Carcinogenicity for humans data - results from epidemiological data - sometimes, case reports and correlation studies c. Carcinogenicity from experimental animal data d. Other data which can be used for the evaluation of carcinogenicity and its mechanism

Summary of evidence required for classification Group 1- Carcinogenic to humans Sufficient evidence in humans Group 2A - Probably carcinogenic to humans Limited evidence in humans and sufficient evidence in animals Group 2B - Possibly carcinogenic to humans Limited evidence in humans, less than sufficient evidence in animals or inadequate evidence in humans, sufficient evidence in animals or inadequate evidence in humans, limited evidence in animals, with other relevant supporting data Group 3 - Not classifiable Inadequate evidence in humans and less than sufficient evidence in experimental animals Group 4 - Probably not carcinogenic to humans

2011 IARC Classified Cell Phones and Other Radiofrequency Radiation as Possibly Carcinogenic Interphone Study: Increased glioma risk occurred with the heaviest phone users (at least 1640 hours). This increase is clearer for tumors on the side of the head where the phone was usually held, i.e. the risk is found exactly where it was expected. Swedish Studies: Pooled analysis showed increased risk for malignant brain tumors and use of cell or cordless phones. The risk increased with latency time and cumulative use. Highest risks found in those that first used a wireless phone before 20 years of age.

What does it mean? There is an increased risk for the heaviest cell phone users (at least 1640 hours). This increase is clearer for gliomas on the side of the head where phone was usually held, i.e. the risk is found exactly where it was expected Further analyses confirm an increased risk (around 2) for the most exposed as Dr Miller will now show us.

Results for EMF May 2011 Group 2B

2A / 2B Why do we care? 2A: Probable human carcinogen 2B: Possible human carcinogen Almost the same words BUT Very different implications: For several countries, 2A automatically leads to action being taken: listing as carcinogen, legislation or regulation, compensation, warnings, etc For 2B: usually nothing

Cell Phone Campaign Lyons France, 2008