AHA Nov 18, 2013 Late Breaking Session

Similar documents
Treatment Of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone antagonist (TOPCAT) AHA Nov 18, 2014 Update on Randomized Trials

HFpEF, Mito or Realidad?

Therapeutic Targets and Interventions. Ali Valika, MD, FACC Advocate Medical Group

Effect of Aliskiren on Postdischarge Outcomes Among Non-Diabetic Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: Insights from the ASTRONAUT Outcomes Trial

Satish K Surabhi, MD.FACC,FSCAI,RPVI Medical Director, Cardiac Cath Labs AnMed Health Heart & Vascular Care

Disclosures for Presenter

Aldosterone Antagonism in Heart Failure: Now for all Patients?

HF-Preserved Ejection Fraction

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

LCZ696 A First-in-Class Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor

HFpEF 2016 : Comorbidities and Outcomes

Faiez Zannad. Institut Lorrain du Coeur et des Vaisseaux. CIC - Inserm

Vitals HR 90 BP 125/58 Tmax 98.7F O2 Sat 97% on NC 2L/min BMP SCr 1.78 K 3.9 Gluc 194 A1c 7.5 Cardiac LVEF 55% NTproBNP 9,200 Troponin 0.

Therapeutic Targets and Interventions

Mihai Gheorghiade MD

2/15/2017. Disclosures. Heart Failure = Big Problem. Heart Failure Update Reducing Hospitalizations and Improving Patient Outcomes 02/18/2017

2017 Summer MAOFP Update

Treating HF Patients with ARNI s Why, When and How?

Disclosures. Advances in Chronic Heart Failure Management 6/12/2017. Van N Selby, MD UCSF Advanced Heart Failure Program June 19, 2017

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Position Statement on ALDOSTERONE ANTAGONIST THERAPY IN CHRONIC HEART FAILURE

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Disclosures. Overview. Goal statement. Advances in Chronic Heart Failure Management 5/22/17


Beyond ACE-inhibitors for Heart Failure. Jacob Townsend, MD NCVH Birmingham 2015

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

From PARADIGM-HF to Clinical Practice. Waleed AlHabeeb, MD, MHA Associate Professor of Medicine President of the Saudi Heart Failure Group

Effect of ferric carboxymaltose on functional capacity in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency (CONFIRM-HF)

Drugs acting on the reninangiotensin-aldosterone

HeFSSA Practitioners Program 2017 Theme The Patient Journey: Feel Good and Live Long. Case Study 2

SCD-HeFT: The Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial

Congestive Heart Failure: Outpatient Management

ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure

Outline. Classification by LVEF Conventional Therapy New Therapies. Ivabradine Sacubitril/valsartan

Heart Failure with Preserved EF (HFPEF) Epidemiology and management

Natriuretic Peptide Guided Therapy for Heart Failure

heart failure John McMurray University of Glasgow.

CT Academy of Family Physicians Scientific Symposium October 2012 Amit Pursnani, MD

The Therapeutic Potential of Novel Approaches to RAAS. Professor of Medicine University of California, San Diego

ESC Guidelines for diagnosis and management of HF 2012: What s new? John Parissis, MD Athens, GR

The Approach to Patients with Heart Failure and Mid-Range (40-50%) Ejection Fraction (HFmrEF)

The Myths of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction:

New evidences in heart failure: the GISSI-HF trial. Aldo P Maggioni, MD ANMCO Research Center Firenze, Italy

Top HF Trials to Impact Your Practice

Mihai Gheorghiade, MD Center for Cardiovascular Innovation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

Updates in Congestive Heart Failure

Updates in Heart Failure (HF) 2016: ACC / AHA and ESC

SGK 2016 Session: Postgraduate Course in Heart Failure Lausanne, 15. June 2016 Heart Failure Guidelines 2016

Heart Failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)

HFpEF. April 26, 2018

Ejection Fraction in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure. Diastolic Heart Failure or Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Highlight Session Heart failure and cardiomyopathies Michel KOMAJDA Paris France

Conflict of interest statement

Heart Failure in Women: Dr Goh Ping Ping Cardiologist Asian Heart & Vascular Centre

Cardiologists and HbA1c: Novel Diabetes Drugs and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes

Combination of renin-angiotensinaldosterone. how to choose?

Supplementary Appendix

Sudden Death in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Competing Risks Analysis from the TOPCAT Trial

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Heart Failure Guidelines For your Daily Practice

The ACC Heart Failure Guidelines

Systolic Dysfunction Clinical /Hemodynamic Guide for Management From Neprilysin Inhibitors to Ivabradine

Overview & Update on the Utilization of the Natriuretic Peptides in Heart Failure

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Online Appendix (JACC )

Using DOACs in CAD Patients in Sinus Ryhthm Results of the ATLAS ACS 2, COMPASS and COMMANDER-HF Trials

2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA HF guidelines. Advances in the Use of Biomarkers in Heart Failure Patients. Outline

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

Detection and Management of Geographic Disparities in the TOPCAT Trial

Taking the FAILURE out of CHF Denzil Moraes, MD, FACC

Heart Failure (HF): Scope of the Problem. Temporal Trends in Age-Adjusted Survival After HF Diagnosis. More malignant than most cancers

New Paradigms in Rx of Symptomati Heart Failure:Role of Ivabradine & Angiotensin Neprilysin Inhibition

Supplementary Appendix

LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial

Predicting and changing the future for people with CKD

HEART FAILURE: PHARMACOTHERAPY UPDATE

HFpEF: How to optimise management

Heart Failure Update. Bibiana Cujec MD May 2015

CADTH CANADIAN DRUG EXPERT COMMITTEE FINAL RECOMMENDATION

Heart Failure: Combination Treatment Strategies

Heart Failure Background, recognition, diagnosis and management

Heart Failure A Team Approach Background, recognition, diagnosis and management

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

RAS Blockade Across the CV Continuum

A patient with decompensated HF

Biomarker-guided HF: What have we learned (so far)?

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Pravin Manga Division of Cardiology Department of Medicine University of Witwatersrand

IN-HF on line: patient settings (Enrollement period= )

ACE inhibitors: still the gold standard?

Understanding and Development of New Therapies for Heart Failure - Lessons from Recent Clinical Trials -

Nitrate s Effect on Activity Tolerance in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (NEAT) A Randomized Clinical Trial

ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure

Reducing Hospital Readmissions and Increasing Time to Hospital Readmission in Blacks with Heart Failure

eplerenone 25, 50mg film-coated tablets (Inspra ) SMC No. (793/12) Pfizer Ltd

Neprilysin Inhibitor (Entresto ) Prior Authorization and Quantity Limit Program Summary

Dr.Fayez EL Shaer Consultant cardiologist Assistant professor of cardiology KKUH

Systolic and Diastolic Dysfunction: Four Upcoming Challenges

Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)

UPDATES IN MANAGEMENT OF HF

Transcription:

Treatment Of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone antagonist (TOPCAT) AHA Nov 18, 2013 Late Breaking Session Marc A. Pfeffer MD, PhD, on behalf of the TOPCAT Investigators TOPCAT Trial Executive Committee Inder Anand, Susan Assmann, Robin Boineau, Akshay Desai, Jerome Fleg, David Lathrop, Eldrin Lewis, Sonja McKinlay, Maureen Montrond, Marc Pfeffer, Bertram Pitt (Chair), Scott Solomon, George Sopko, Nancy Sweitzer, Song Yang. ClinTrials.gov NCT00094302 HHS Contract # HHSN268200425207C

Probability of Survival MRAs Beneficial in HFrEF and Post-MI LVD RALES (Severe HFrEF) EPHESUS (Post-MI) EMPHASIS (Mild HFrEF) 1.00 0.90 30% Risk Reduction 15% Risk Reduction 1.00 0.90 Epleronone 1.00 0.90 22% Risk Reduction Epleronone 0.80 0.70 0.80 0.70 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.40 RR = 0.70 P < 0.001 0 12 24 36 Months 0.50 0.40 RR = 0.85 P < 0.008 0 12 24 36 Months 0.50 RR = 0.78 P = 0.014 0.40 0 12 24 36 Months Pitt NEJM 1999 Pitt NEJM 2003 Zannad NEJM 2011 Reviews of Mechanisms : Pitt Heart Fail Rev 2012; Kamalov,,Weber JCV Pharm 2013

Treatment Of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone antagonist (TOPCAT) Objective To determine if treatment with spironolactone can produce a clinically meaningful reduction in the composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality, aborted cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for the management of heart failure, compared with placebo, in adults with HF-Preserved EF. Inclusions: Symptomatic Heart Failure, Age 50, LVEF 45%, stratified according to: Hospitalization within the past year for management of heart failure, or Elevated natriuretic peptides (BNP 100 pg/ml or NT-proBNP 360 pg/ml) Major Exclusions: egfr<30 ml/min/1.7m 2, serum potassium 5 mmol/l, uncontrolled hypertension, AF with rate > 90/min, recent ACS, restrictive, infiltrative, or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Rationale and design: (A. Desai, Am Heart J 2011)

Design / Statistical Considerations International (6) multi-center (270), double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial Randomization, 1:1 within each stratum, to either, 15, 30, 45 mg daily, or matching placebo 80% power to detect a 20% relative reduction in primary events (CVD, HF hosp, or aborted cardiac arrest): 551 adjudicated primary events (approximately 3,515 subjects) Assuming 3-year placebo primary outcome rate of 17.4% Log-rank test, two-sided p<0.05, ITT A.Desai Am Heart J 2011

Baseline Variable* NYHA Class II III N = 1722 N = 1723 63.3% 33.0% 64.3% 32.2% LVEF % 56 (51, 61) 56 (51, 62) Stratum Hosp. for HF Natriuretic Peptide** 71.5% 28.5% 71.5% 28.5% Age 69 (61, 76) 69 (61, 76) Female 52% 51% Hypertension 91% 92% Coronary Artery Disease 57% 60% Myocardial Infarction 26% 26% Stroke 7% 8% Atrial Fibrillation 35% 35% Diabetes Mellitus 33% 32% Smoking (current) 10% 11% *Reported as % or median (Q1, Q3) **(BNP 100 pg/ml or NT-proBNP 360 pg/ml) S. Shah Circ HF 2012

Baseline (2) Variable* N = 1722 N = 1723 Systolic Blood Pressure 130 (120, 139) 130 (120, 140) Diastolic Blood Pressure 80 (70, 80) 80 (70, 80) Heart Rate 68 (62, 76) 68 (62, 76) BMI (kg/m 2 ) 31 (27, 36) 31 (27, 36) egfr (ml/min/1.73m 2 ) < 60 (ml/min/1.73m 2 ) 65 (54, 79) 39% 66 (54, 79) 38% Serum Potassium (meq/l) 4.3 (4.0, 4.6) 4.3 (4.0, 4.6) Hemoglobin (g/dl) 13.2 (12.1, 14.4) 13.3 (12.2, 14.5) Medications ACE-I or ARB 84% 84% Beta-blocker 78% 77% Diuretic 81% 82% Statin 53% 52% Anticoagulant 23% 22% *Reported as % or median (Q1, Q3) A. Shah Circ HF 2013 (echo) S. Shah Circ HF 2012 (baseline)

Patient Participation Randomized: N=3445; Mean follow-up: 3.3 years US (1,151); Russia (1,066); Rep. of Georgia (612); Canada (326); Brazil (167); Argentina (123) Mean Dose at 8 months: spironolactone 25 mg; placebo 28 mg N=1,722 % discontinued study medication: 1 year: 17.0% 2 year: 25.1% End: 34.3% N=1,723 % discontinued study medication: 1 year: 13.5% 2 year: 20.1% End: 31.4% Vital status unknown: 67 (3.9%) Vital status unknown: 65 (3.8%)

1 Outcome (CV Death, HF Hosp, or Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest) 351/1723 (20.4%) HR = 0.89 (0.77 1.04) p=0.138 320/1722 (18.6%)

1 and Components Outcome Primary Outcome Primary Components CV Mortality Aborted Cardiac Arrest Hospitalization for Heart Failure # and % of Subjects with Event, and Event Rate (N = 1722) 320 (18.6%) 5.9/100pt-yr 160 (9.3%) 2.8/100pt-yr 3 (<1%) 0.05/100pt-yr 206 (12.0%) 3.8/100pt-yr (N = 1723) 351 (20.4%) 6.6/100pt-yr 176 (10.2%) 3.1/100pt-yr 5 (<1%) 0.09/100pt-yr 245 (14.2%) 4.6/100pt-yr Hazard Ratio (95% CI) p-value 0.89 (0.77-1.04) P=0.138 0.90 (0.73-1.12) P=0.354 0.60 (0.14-2.50) P=0.482 0.83 (0.69-0.99) P=0.042

Heart Failure Hospitalizations 245/1723 (14.2%) HR = 0.83 (0.69 0.99) p=0.042 206/1722 (12.0%)

Heart Failure Hospitalizations Total HF Hosp Spiro : 394 : 475 P<0.01* HR = 0.83 (0.69 0.99) p=0.042 245/1723 (14.2%) 206/1722 (12.0%) *poisson regression

Probability Deaths, Hospitalization all causes 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 Hospitalization Death HR = 0.94 (0.85 1.04) p=0.248 [15.9%] [14.6%] HR = 0.91 (0.77 1.08) p=0.294 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 Months

Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) No significant differences were found in either: The number of patients spironolactone 835 (48.5%) vs. placebo 855 (49.6%) or The total reports of SAEs spironolactone 2395 vs. placebo 2387 However,...

Serum Potassium* Potassium Spiro P (chisq) Hyperkalemia ( 5.5 mmol/l) Hypokalemia (<3.5 mmol/l) 322 (18.7%) 279 (16.2%) 157 (9.1%) 394 (22.9%) <0.001 <0.001 No deaths related to hyperkalemia were reported. *Monitoring at each dose change and visit (algorithm in Desai Am Heart J 2011)

Creatinine At least 3.0 mg/dl Doubling above ULN HR=1.49 (1.18, 1.87) p<0.001 (265 ug/l) HR=1.06 (0.79, 1.43) p=0.697

Creatinine At least 3.0 mg/dl Doubling above ULN HR=1.49 (1.18, 1.87) p<0.001 (265 ug/l) Reports of Dialysis: Spiro n= 19 (1.1%) n= 32 (1.9%) HR=1.06 (0.79, 1.43) p=0.697

Subgroups Of 22 pre-specified, only 1 - Stratum - showed a significant interaction with treatment Enrolled by: Spiro Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P-value Natriuretic peptide 78/490 (15.9%) 116/491 (23.6%) 0.65 (0.49-0.87) 0.003 Heart Failure Hosp 242/1232 (19.6%) 235/1232 (19.1%) 1.01 (0.84-1.21) 0.923 *P=0.013 for interaction

Rates: Primary Outcome, by region US, Canada, Argentina, Brazil 12.6 per 100 pt-yr : 280/881 (31.8%) Russia, Rep Georgia 2.3 per 100 pt-yr : 71/842 (8.4%)

Exploratory (post-hoc): vs. Spiro by region US, Canada, Argentina, Brazil HR=0.82 (0.69-0.98) : 280/881 (31.8%) Interaction p=0.122 : 71/842 (8.4%) Russia, Rep Georgia HR=1.10 (0.79-1.51)

Summary (N = 1722) (N = 1723) HR (95% CI) Primary Outcome 320 (18.6%) 5.9/100pt-yr 351 (20.4%) 6.6/100pt-yr 0.89 (0.77-1.04) P=0.138 Hospitalization for Heart Failure 206 (12.0%) 3.8/100pt-yr 245 (14.2%) 4.6/100pt-yr 0.83 (0.69-0.99) P=0.042 Multiple HF Hosp P<0.01 Conclusions: TOPCAT population with HFpEF: Rx with spironolactone did not alter the 1 composite, but did reduce hospitalizations for heart failure Reductions in heart failure were observed Use of spironolactone in these patients requires careful monitoring of K + and creatinine

Thank you Patients and Investigators Steering Committee: Barry Massie, Milton Packer, Bertram Pitt (Chair), Sanjeev Saksena, Edward Shapiro, Michael Zile Clinical Trials Coordinating Center: Sonja McKinlay (PI), Marc Pfeffer (Clinical PI), Susan Assmann (Snr Statistician), Hae-Young Kim, Brian Harty, Christopher Kenwood, Brian Claggett, Scott Solomon, Akshay Desai, the TOPCAT Team Clinical Events Adjudication Committee: Ebrahim Barkoudah, Peter V. Finn, Jacob Joseph, Eldrin F. Lewis (Chair), Kayode Odutayo, Anne-Catherine Pouleur Country Leaders: Argentina- Raphael Diaz; Brazil- Nadine Clausell; Canada- Eileen O Meara, Jean Rouleau; Rep. Georgia- Tomas Shaburishvili; Russia- Ivan Gordeev; USA- Inder Anand, John Heitner, Jeff Probstfield, David Whellan DSMB: Michael Bristow (Chair), Bernard Gersh, Christine Grady, Barry Greenberg, Madeline Rice, Steven Singh NHLBI: Robin Boineau (Project Officer), Jerome Fleg, Song Yang