Drug Driving in NSW: evidence-gathering, enforcement and education

Similar documents
South Australian Alcohol and Other Drug Strategy

Review of Drug Impaired Driving Legislation (Victoria Dec 2000) and New Random Drug Driving Legislation Based on Oral Fluid Testing

Drugs and Driving: Detection and Deterrence

Sampling Methodology

RESPONSE TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT S CONSULTATION PAPER

P.O. Box 4670, Station E, Ottawa, ON K1S 5H8 Tel Fax Website: BULLETIN!

The British Columbia Coroners Service is committed to conducting a thorough, independent examination of the factors contributing to death in order to

Driving Drunk, Driving High: A Comparison of Student Attitudes Towards Driving while Drunk Versus Driving while High on Cannabis

Getting to Zero Alcohol- Impaired Driving Fatalities: A Comprehensive Approach to a Persistent Problem

RSA Alcohol and Driving Research 2017

Age and Sex Profiles of Speeding and Drink Driving Offenders and Drivers Involved in Casualty Crashes

Impairment and Driving Assessments of Drivers Given Amphetamines, Cannabis and Benzodiazepines and Oral Fluid Testing Results.

Effects of Drugs (Other than A lcohol) on Road Safety in V ictoria

Drugs and Alcohol Abuse Policy

Drug Impaired Driving Update. Chuck Hayes International Association of Chiefs of Police

An Overview of the Government of Canada s Approach to Legalize, Regulate and Restrict Access to Cannabis. February 2018

ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM OF MARIJUANA- IMPAIRED DRIVING By Teri Moore May 2018

AN INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT AND THE PERCEIVED RISK OF DETECTION FOR DRIVING OFFENCES

Random drug testing in Australia, analogies with RBT, and likely effects with increased intensity levels

Cannabis Legalization August 22, Ministry of Attorney General Ministry of Finance

Dazed & Confused: Marijuana Impaired Driving Policy & Solutions

Impaired Driving: Progress and Challenges

The Road Safety Monitor Drugs and Driving A DRIVING FORCE FOR SAFETY

Standardized Field Sobriety Testing Refresher

Ending Marijuana Prohibition/ The Effects on Impaired Driving. Colorado Highway Safety Office

An Overview of the Government of Canada s Approach to Legalize, Regulate and Restrict Access to Cannabis

Development Department Research Programme Research Findings No. 102

Report on Drugged Driving in Louisiana. Quantification of its Impact on Public Health and Implications for Legislation, Enforcement and Prosecution

Statistics on Drink and Drug Driving in Northern Ireland

ONRSR Consultation Paper. Drug and Alcohol Management Review

Synthesis title: Drink driving. Observatory main category: Drivers

IMPAIRED DRIVING ISSUES DAVID ANDRASCIK PA DUI ASSOCIATION DRUG EVALUATION AND CLASSIFICATION PROGRAM STATE COORDINATOR

Impaired Driving Emphasis Area Team Report Thursday February 15, 2018, 2:00 p.m.

Current New Zealand BAC Limit. BAC (mg/100ml)

Legalization and Regulation of Recreational Cannabis PRESENTATION LPPANS NOVEMBER 22, 2017

Tired of Raising Awareness of Driver Fatigue? Push On. NSW Roads and Traffic Authority (RTA) 1 ; Ipsos Australia 2

What s the drug driving problem represented to be?

DRINK AND DRUG-RELATED DRIVING

OECD Paris, September 2008

Substance consumption and willingness to drive a comparison of illegal drugs and alcohol

DRINKING AND DRIVING. Alcohol consumption, even in relatively small quantities, increases the risk of road crashes.

Legalization and Regulation of Cannabis Enforcement Challenges

Legalizing Marijuana: Anticipated Challenges

Drug Profiles of Apprehended Drivers in Victoria

The Promise of DWI Courts November 14, 2013 Judge J. Michael Kavanaugh, (Ret.) Senior Director NCDC Judge Kent Lawrence, (Ret.)

Prince Edward Island: Preparation for Cannabis Legalization

The Worldwide Decline in Drinking and Driving

Impaired Driving in Canada

Drug and Alcohol Awareness

Drug-Impaired Driving in Europe

REPORTED ATTITUDES, PRACTICES AND KNOWLEDGE IN RELATION TO DRINK-DRIVING: THE EFFECTS OF THE INTRODUCTION OF RANDOM BREATH TESTING IN NEW SOUTH WALES

QUESTIONNAIRE. Submission Information. Information for follow-up purposes. Head of International Drug Policy, Home Office

Road Safety Authority Annual International Road Safety Conference

NSW Drug and Alcohol Management Requirements - Q&A

Legalization of Cannabis: The Way Forward

Our focus. Your priorities.

Earlier arrests among apprehended drivers in Norway with heroin and ecstasy detection

PASSIVE TESTING FOR ALCOHOL WHITE PAPER SERIES ABSTRACT

Youth Involvement In Traffic Accidents In Japan-New Trends

of the Royal College of Physicians, London Registered Charity No:

Alcohol and drugs among motorcycle riders compared with car and van drivers killed in road crashes in Norway during

Risk Factors Associated with Speeding Offences Among Young Western Australian Drivers

Safeguarding Our High ways Combating Drugged Driving

2016 Drive Sober Labor Day Campaign Louisiana Scheduler

POLICY AND GUIDANCE FOR MANAGERS ON STAFF SUBSTANCE MISUSE

Our focus. Your priorities.

4/27/2016. About CCSA. Impaired Driving Research at CCSA. Background. Presentation Overview. Lessons Learned

Rural and remote road crashes: piecing together the story

Research Agenda: Update June14, 2018

MRJ Baldock & JE Woolley Roadside drug testing in Australia: the absence of crash-based evaluations

KEY FINDINGS. High School Student Data

The Risk of Alcohol-Related Traffic Events and Recidivism Among Young Offenders A Theoretical Approach

Impaired driving enforcement practices among state and local law enforcement agencies

Cannabis Legalization and Regulation in British Columbia Discussion Paper

Drug Evaluation. and Classification in Nova Scotia AND THE IMPACT OF THE LEGALIZATION OF CANNABIS. Item No

Drinking and Driving Issues and Strategies in British Columbia Discussion Paper

THE LATYMER SCHOOL Founded 1624

Drug-Impaired Driving in the United States

Copyright 2013 Crosscutting Concepts, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Australian Owned and Manufactured. Largest Supplier of Roadside alcohol test devices to Australian Police

36 th International Traffic Records Forum New Orleans, Louisiana. Ron Beck Cristian Oros Missouri State Highway Patrol

LIQUOR POLICY REFORM IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

Thinking. Purpose To raise awareness of the risks and laws related to drug and alcohol issues that students may face.

Progress has been achieved but there is more work to do

STOP-DWI stands for Special Traffic Options Program for Driving While Intoxicated.

Oral Fluid Drug Screening

Alcohol-Related Crashes Alcohol Overview

Reducing cannabis-impaired driving: Is there sufficient evidence for drug-testing of drivers?

PUERTO RICO: SPEEDING HABITS 2015

Worldwide Trends in Drinking and Driving: Has the Progress Continued?

and practice: Three AIC examples Dr Adam Tomison

ALCOHOL IMPAIRED IMPAIRED

Age of Drinking Onset, Driving After Drinking, and Involvement in Alcohol Related Motor Vehicle Crashes

TO PUNISH AND/OR TO TREAT THE DRIVER UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL AND/OR OTHER DRUGS. M. R. Valverius, M.D. SYNOPSIS

A Colorado Validation Study. of the. Standardized Field Sobriety Test (SFST) Battery

Drink Driving Fast Facts Draft

How Safe Are Our Roads? 2016 Checkpoint Strikeforce campaign poster celebrating real area cab drivers as being Beautiful designated sober drivers.

NSW POLICE FORCE ALCOHOL STRATEGY NSW POLICE FORCE ALCOHOL STRATEGY 1

The Drug Evaluation and Classification Program

Prevalence of cannabis-impaired driving and crash risk

Transcription:

Drug Driving in NSW: evidence-gathering, enforcement and education Evan a, Bernard Carlon, Alice Ma, Hassan Raisianzadeh, Ralston Fernandes, and Louise Higgins-Whitton a All authors: Transport for NSW Abstract Drug driving is an area of increased research focus and policy action in NSW. Recent research by Transport for NSW (TfNSW) has identified that 13% of fatalities on NSW roads over the period 2010-13 involved a driver or rider with at least one of three illicit drugs (cannabis, speed, ecstasy) present in their system. This places drug driving alongside other key behavioural factors in the road toll, including alcohol and fatigue. A recent survey of NSW drivers who use illicit drugs found that 30% self-reported drug driving at some point. This equates to a prevalence rate of 2% of NSW drivers. It also found that drug drivers in NSW are generally not yet convinced of the likelihood of being caught and that many think their drug use does not impair their driving skills. Work is underway with the NSW Police Force to better understand the available evidence and further deter drug driving. Actions include detailed analysis of laboratory results from drug driving offences and enhanced linkage of drug test and crash data to inform policy development and trends analysis. Roadside drug testing, which has been in place in NSW since 2007, will also be significantly expanded from around 30,000 tests per year to over 90,000 tests per year. Operations are targeted to high risk locations and are increasingly mobile and decentralised to enhance regional enforcement and maximise deterrence. To support the rollout of enhanced enforcement, TfNSW has commenced development of a communication strategy and public education. Introduction In March 2015, the NSW Government announced a threefold increase in roadside drug testing on NSW roads by 2017. This initiative is one part of a package to enhance drug driving countermeasures, which also includes the development of targeted drug driving communications informed by survey research; and an ongoing research commitment to enhancing analysis of drug test results and linkage to NSW crash data. The aim of this paper is to provide a brief outline of recent Transport for NSW research on drug driving, and the new initiatives. Background Over the past decade, the focus for NSW drug driving programs has been deterring and detecting drug drivers and riders through on-road enforcement by the NSW Police Force. Under the Road Transport Act 2013, drivers can be charged for driving with the presence of an illicit drug (cannabis, speed, ecstasy, cocaine or heroin) in their system. Drivers in NSW can also be charged with Driving under the Influence (DUI) of an illicit or pharmaceutical drug if they have drugs in their blood or urine, and are driving impaired.

NSW Police commenced roadside drug testing of drivers oral fluid in 2007. The power to conduct roadside testing supplemented existing Police powers to arrest and blood test drivers believed to be under the influence of drugs. Roadside testing detects three commonly used illicit drugs only: delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, methylamphetamine and methylenedioxymenthylamphetamine (referred to as cannabis, speed and ecstasy). Positive roadside test results are confirmed by laboratory screening of oral fluid samples. Since introduction, over 250,000 roadside tests have been conducted by NSW Police. Overall, one in 34 drivers have tested positive at the roadside for one or more commonly used illicit drug. Around 1,000 drivers in NSW have been convicted of a drug driving offence (presence or driving under the influence) each year since 2008. To date, communications have played a minor role in supporting Police enforcement, including targeted information for the heavy vehicle industry and the high school curriculum. Recent NSW research Drug driving and the NSW road toll Since December 2006, NSW road transport legislation has enabled compulsory drug testing of drivers/riders and supervising drivers involved in fatal crashes. Results have been used by NSW Police to prosecute drivers for drug driving or other serious culpable driving offences but have not, until recently, been linked to NSW crash data for road safety analysis. In 2014, Transport for NSW obtained and matched test results for drivers and riders involved in fatal crashes over the period 2010-2013 from the Forensic and Analytical Science Services (FASS) of NSW Health. As a first step, results were analysed for the presence of the three common illicit drugs detectable through roadside testing (cannabis, speed and ecstasy). Over the period 2010-2013, 174 fatal crashes (13% of all fatal crashes on NSW roads) involved a driver or motorcycle rider with at least one of the three illicit drugs present in their system. The proportion of NSW fatalities from fatal crashes involving a driver/rider with illicit drugs present in their system has increased slightly over the four year period analysed, from 13% in 2010, to 16% in 2013. To place this in context with other behavioural factors in the NSW road toll, over the period 2010-2013 illicit drugs were present (in an impairing or other concentration) in a similar proportion of NSW fatalities to illegal alcohol or fatigue; see Figure 1 below.

Drivers/riders involved in fatal crashes with illicit drugs present in their system were more likely to have also engaged in other high risk behaviours, including illegal blood alcohol (25%) or speeding (48%). A majority of the drivers/riders identified were male (86%). Further analysis is now underway to maximise the completeness of the data set and analyse the extent to which other illicit drugs and misused pharmaceutical drugs are present in NSW fatal crashes and potential impairment of drivers involved in fatal crashes. Self-reported behaviour and attitudes of NSW drivers who use illicit drugs In 2014, Transport for NSW commissioned attitudinal research involving NSW drivers to determine the prevalence of drug driving on NSW roads and to explore the attitudes and beliefs of selfreported drug drivers (Taverner Research, 2015). The survey is the follow up to research completed in 2008, shortly after the introduction of roadside drug testing (Taverner Research, 2009). The 2014 telephone survey sample included over 7,500 NSW licensed drivers. An extended telephone interview was undertaken with a subsample of over 500 drivers who admitted to recent illicit use of drugs (use of a common illicit drug or pharmaceutical drug illicitly in the previous 12 months). Amongst the subsample of NSW drivers who admitted to recent illicit drug use, 30% reported driving after taking drugs at some point in the past. This equates to a population prevalence of 2%. A similar but separate telephone survey was also recently completed involving NSW drivers who regularly drink alcohol to monitor drink driving behaviour. Overall, 3% of drivers surveyed admitted to driving within the previous month when they knew or suspected they were over the legal alcohol limit (Taverner Research, 2015b). To compare, 13% of NSW drivers who admitted to recent illicit drug use reported drug driving at least once a month. This highlights that while illicit drug drivers represent a comparatively smaller proportion of the population, they report drug driving more regularly than drink drivers report drink-driving. Illicit drug driving was more prevalent among males and younger drivers (age groups from 16-39 years). There was also a strong relationship between frequency of drug use and frequency of drug driving, with more frequent users (particularly regular users of marijuana) reporting more frequent drug driving. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of drug driving between metropolitan and non-metropolitan respondents.

In general, self-reported drug drivers were less likely to see the risks associated with drug driving, with many (44%) believing that the drugs they take do not diminish their driving ability. Drug drivers also reported being much more willing to be a passenger in a vehicle driven by a driver under the influence. The survey also found that, while there are high levels of awareness that drug driving is illegal and that Police can conduct drug testing, illicit drug using drivers are not yet convinced that a drug driver is likely to be caught (49%). This is compared to 70% of the same sample who thought it likely that a drink driver would be caught. These findings highlight the need to enhance the deterrent effect of drug driving enforcement in NSW, as well as shift drug users beliefs about how drugs affect their driving skills and safety. Drug driving initiatives The new research has provided an evidence base to enhance drug driving countermeasures in NSW. Leveraging the success of past strategies to address drink driving, NSW has now adopted an integrated general deterrence approach to drug driving that combines high visibility police enforcement with public education. Further research will also inform a review of NSW drug driving policy and legislation to ensure that offences and penalties are appropriate to deter drug driving and address emerging issues. The new initiatives are being delivered by Transport for NSW in consultation with a drug driving consultative group comprised of key NSW Government agencies. The consultative group enables a whole-of-government approach that will ensure related government policy development and programs are also considered in future drug-driving review and reform. Key initiatives include: Strengthening NSW Police enforcement By 2017, the number of roadside drug tests in NSW will reach over 97,000 tests per year. Deterrence will be maximised through an increasingly decentralised and mobile approach to enforcement. New drug testing devices are being rolled out to police stations across NSW to enhance enforcement capability in regional and rural NSW. Portable initial drug testing wipes are being made available to trained officers in patrol vehicles to enable mobile enforcement. From February 2015, legislative enhancements to the Road Transport Act 2013 also came into effect to expand the circumstances in which Police may order a sobriety assessment and blood test if they suspect a driver is under the influence of a drug. NSW Police can now require this test if a person s appearance, behaviour or manner leads them to suspect the driver may be under the influence. These changes will significantly enhance the visibility and increase the unpredictability of drug testing, providing more deterrence from enforcement. Developing a new drug driving communications strategy To enhance the general deterrence provided by the expanded roadside drug testing regime, and increase community awareness and social unacceptability of drug driving, Transport for NSW is developing a broad based communications strategy. This will include a state-wide public education campaign, based on behaviour change principles and insights from recent attitudinal research and crash analysis. The rollout of the campaign will be

timed to coincide with staged increases in NSW Police enforcement over the period from 2015 to 2017.Work is also underway to develop targeted communications for high risk groups and to enhance school based education materials delivered as part of the NSW high school curriculum. Enhancing analysis of drug test results and linkage to NSW crash data Transport for NSW is working closely with the NSW Police to enhance the analysis of results from roadside oral fluid testing, blood and urine testing from fatal crashes and drug driving offences, and to interpret test results linked to crash information. This research partnership will provide a detailed report of drug driving on NSW roads over time, and will explore the potential road safety impact of illicit, emerging, synthetic and pharmaceutical drugs. This information may also enable strategic deployment of drug enforcement operations to high risk areas. References Taverner Research (2009). 2008 Drug Driving Survey of NSW Drivers. Unpublished Research Report prepared for NSW Roads and Traffic Authority. Taverner Research (2015). Illicit Drug Using Drivers in NSW. Unpublished Research Report prepared for Transport for NSW. Taverner Research (2015b). 2014 Drink Driving: A Survey of NSW Drivers. Unpublished Research Report prepared for Transport for NSW.