Monte Carlo for CyberKnife Incise TM MLC

Similar documents
The Journey of Cyberknife Commissioning

It s All About Margins. Maaike Milder, Ph.D. Accuray Symposium April 21 st 2018

Independent Dose Verification for IMRT Using Monte Carlo. C-M M Charlie Ma, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Oncology FCCC, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA

Disclosure. Outline. Machine Overview. I have received honoraria from Accuray in the past. I have had travel expenses paid by Accuray in the past.

Review of TG-186 recommendations

Film-based dose validation of Monte Carlo algorithm for Cyberknife system with a CIRS thorax phantom

The Radixact System Experience at Miami Cancer Institute. Tino Romaguera, D.Sc. Senior Physicist

Clinical experience with TomoDirect System Tangential Mode

Assessing Heterogeneity Correction Algorithms Using the Radiological Physics Center Anthropomorphic Thorax Phantom

Monte Carlo Dose Calculation for Radiotherapy Treatment Planning

The TomoTherapy System as a Tool of Differentiation in Quality and Marketability

Non-target dose from radiotherapy: Magnitude, Evaluation, and Impact. Stephen F. Kry, Ph.D., D.ABR.

Quality Assurance of TPS: comparison of dose calculation for stereotactic patients in Eclipse and iplan RT Dose

Leila E. A. Nichol Royal Surrey County Hospital

A. DeWerd. Michael Kissick. Larry. Editors. The Phantoms of Medical. and Health Physics. Devices for Research and Development.

Albert Lisbona Medical Physics Department CLCC Nantes Atlantique a

Basic dosimetric data for treatment planning system

The RPC s Evaluation of Advanced Technologies. AAPM Refresher Course July 29, 2008 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff

8/2/2018. Disclosures. In ICRU91: SRT = {SBRT/SABR, SRS}

A model for assessing VMAT pre-treatment verification systems and VMAT optimization algorithms

Borges C 1, Zarza- Moreno M 2, Teixeira N 2, Vaz P 3 1

Out-of-field doses of CyberKnife in stereotactic radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients

EORTC Member Facility Questionnaire

Precisely Maximize Dose, side effects, Patient

CYBERKNIFE M6 SERIES: Unmatched Precision and Patient Comfort

Imaging of Radiation Dose Using Cherenkov Light

Dosimetric verification and quality assurance of runningstart-stop (RSS) delivery in tomotherapy

Dosimetry of the Gamma Knife TM

Hot Topics in SRS: Small Field Dosimetry & Other Treatment Uncertainties. Sonja Dieterich, PhD University of California Davis

Plan-Specific Correction Factors for Small- Volume Ion Chamber Dosimetry in Modulated Treatments on a Varian Trilogy

Data Collected During Audits for Clinical Trials. July 21, 2010 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff

Calibration of dosimeters for small mega voltage photon fields at ARPANSA

One stop shop. Natalie D. Klass, MD

Level of Accuracy Practically Achievable in Radiation Therapy. David Followill and RPC staff August 6, 2013

Vertebral Body Compression Fracture Following Spine SBRT

Strengthening the weakest link: improving tumour definition

The PreciseART Approach to Adaptive Radiotherapy with the RADIXACT System. Prof. Anne Laprie Radiation Oncologist

Implementing New Technologies for Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Quality assurance in external radiotherapy

AAPM Task Group 180 Image Guidance Doses Delivered During Radiotherapy: Quantification, Management, and Reduction

SBRT Credentialing: Understanding the Process from Inquiry to Approval

Fiducial-Free Lung Tracking and Treatment with the CyberKnife System: A Non-Invasive Approach

Independent corroboration of monitor unit calculations performed by a 3D computerized planning system

Treating Multiple. Brain Metastases (BM)

Accuracy Requirements and Uncertainty Considerations in Radiation Therapy

JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, VOLUME 4, NUMBER 4, FALL 2003

STEREOTACTIC DOSE VERIFICATION PHANTOM VERSATILE STEREOTACTIC QA PHANTOMS

An Independent Audit and Analysis of Small Field Dosimetry Quality Assurance. David Followill IROC Houston QA Center

Report to the 18 th Meeting of the CCRI(I), May 2007 Recent Activities in Measurement Standards and Dosimetry at METAS,

Guidelines for the use of inversely planned treatment techniques in Clinical Trials: IMRT, VMAT, TomoTherapy

Benchmarking treatment planning dose calculations using a Monte Carlo dose engine as a potential activity of a primary standard lab

Quality assurance and credentialing requirements for sites using inverse planned IMRT Techniques

typical IMRT fraction time and expand high definition radiotherapy anywhere in the body with the widest range of motion of the

PRECISE, ROBOTIC TREATMENT AS INDIVIDUAL AS EVERY PATIENT

CALCULATION OF BACKSCATTER FACTORS FOR LOW ENERGY X-RAYS USING THE TOPAS MONTE CARLO CODE

Novel techniques for normal tissue toxicity modelling. Laura Cella Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging National Research Council of Italy

Heterogeneity Corrections in Clinical Trials

Immunotherapy & radiotherapy

Planning for the Installation of a Compact Superconducting Proton Therapy Unit in a Busy Medical Center Environment

QA for Clinical Dosimetry with Emphasis on Clinical Trials

Transition to Heterogeneity Corrections. Why have accurate dose algorithms?

IMRT QUESTIONNAIRE. Address: Physicist: Research Associate: Dosimetrist: Responsible Radiation Oncologist(s)

What Can Go Wrong in Radiation Treatment: Data from the RPC. Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff

Application of MCNP4C Monte Carlo code in radiation dosimetry in heterogeneous phantom

New Thinking on Fractionation in Radiotherapy

Production and dosimetry of simultaneous therapeutic photons and electrons beam by linear accelerator: a monte carlo study

Effective and efficient radiotherapy dosimetry audit: Where to next?

S. Derreumaux (IRSN) Accidents in radiation therapy in France: causes, consequences and lessons learned

4 Essentials of CK Physics 8/2/2012. SRS using the CyberKnife. Disclaimer/Conflict of Interest

Dosimetric Comparison: Acuros XB vs AAA

DOSIMETRIC COMPARISION FOR RADIATION QUALITY IN HIGH ENERGY PHOTON BEAMS

Assessment of a three-dimensional (3D) water scanning system for beam commissioning and measurements on a helical tomotherapy unit

Verification of Relative Output Factor (ROF) Measurement for Radiosurgery Small Photon Beams

Integrating the Radixact into a Highly Comprehensive Center

Inhomogeneity effect in Varian Trilogy Clinac ix 10 MV photon beam using EGSnrc and Geant4 code system

7/31/2012. Volumetric modulated arc therapy. UAB Department of Radiation Oncology. Richard Popple, Ph.D.

SRS Uncertainty: Linac and CyberKnife Uncertainties

Clinical Implementation of SRS/SBRT

Electron Beam ET - Reloaded Therapy - Reloaded

Accuracy of the Small Field Dosimetry Using the Acuros XB Dose Calculation Algorithm within and beyond Heterogeneous Media for 6 MV Photon Beams *

S Y N C H R O N Y R E S P I R A T O R Y T R A C K I N G S Y S T E M

02 CyberKnife: Treatment Delivery

CyberKnife SBRT for Prostate Cancer

Introduction of RapidArc TM : an example of commissioning and implementing a QA programme for a new technology

Advanced Tumor Treatment

Protons Monte Carlo water-equivalence study of two PRESAGE formulations for proton beam dosimetry J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

Commissioning of brachytherapy Treatment Planning Systems

Special Procedures Rotation I/II SBRT, SRS, TBI, and TSET

Technical Study. Institution University of Texas Health San Antonio. Location San Antonio, Texas. Medical Staff. Daniel Saenz. Niko Papanikolaou.

Hampton University Proton Therapy Institute

A review of RTTQA audit. Karen Venables

Organ Dose Reconstruction for Wilms Tumor Patients Treated with Radiation Therapy

Verification of Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques

Analytical Methods for Normal- Tissue Dose Reconstructions. Acknowledgments. Disclosures. Learning Objectives 8/2/2017. Wayne Newhauser, PhD

PSMMP PUBLICATIONS 2016

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Lesions using the CyberKnife of-the-art and New Innovations

New CyberKnife M6 Service at HKSH for Cancer Patients Shorter Treatment Time, Fewer Side Effects and Improved Patient Outcomes

Journal extended Abstracts FL-AAPM Spring Meeting April 28-30, 2017, Orlando FL

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetric Aspects & Commissioning Strategies

Transcription:

Division of Medical Radiation Physics Monte Carlo for CyberKnife Incise TM MLC Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Switzerland

Disclosure & Disclaimer An honorarium is provided by Accuray for this presentation The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenters and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of Accuray Incorporated or its subsidiaries. No official endorsement by Accuray Incorporated or any of its subsidiaries of any vendor, products or services contained in this presentation is intended or should be inferred.

Outline CyberKnife M6 System at the Inselspital Bern Commissioning Evaluation In-house independent MC dose calculation (IDC) for InCise MLC Evaluation Benchmarking of MC dose calculation for InCise MLC Summary

CyberKnife M6 System at the Inselspital Bern 2014: Installation of CyberKnife M6 System. May 2014: Start of patient treatments. July 2015: Installation of InCise MLC. August 2017: CyberKnife -11 Upgrade (requirement for the use of Monte Carlo (MC) for the InCise MLC).

CyberKnife M6 System at the Inselspital Bern

Commissioning Finite Size Pencil Beam (FSPB) algorithm must be commissioned before starting with MC commissioning. No additional data/measurements required for the MC MLC algorithm. Estimated time needed for commissioning: 3-5 days.

Commissioning - Workflow FSPB MC START Define Source Model (FWHM, Energy) Calculate TPR Calculate OCR Calculate OF ok ok Inselspital Bern: FWHM = 2.0 mm Energy = 6.3 MeV Compare calc. vs meas. TPR Compare calc. vs meas. OCR Compare calc. vs meas. OF ok FINISH nok nok nok

Evaluation In-house independent MC dose calculation (IDC) for InCise MLC Geometry model of the CyberKnife System equipped with the InCise MLC Ref: P.-H. Mackeprang et al., "Independent Monte-Carlo dose calculation for MLC based CyberKnife radiotherapy", Phys. Med. Biol. 63, 2018.

Evaluation In-house independent MC dose calculation (IDC) for InCise MLC Model is validated with measurements. Ref: P.-H. Mackeprang et al., "Independent Monte-Carlo dose calculation for MLC based CyberKnife radiotherapy", Phys. Med. Biol. 63, 2018.

Evaluation In-house independent MC dose calculation (IDC) for InCise MLC An MC-based modular IDC-Framework was successfully developed, implemented and validated against measurements and is now available to perform patient-specific QA. Ref: P.-H. Mackeprang et al., "Independent Monte-Carlo dose calculation for MLC based CyberKnife radiotherapy", Phys. Med. Biol. 63, 2018.

Evaluation Benchmarking of MC dose calculation for InCise MLC IDC - Framework COMPARISON Precision Dose distributions in water 11 rectangular MLC field sizes TPR, OCR Dose distributions in lung phantom (CIRS Thorax Phantom) Single MLC field Dose distributions in patients 2 prostate cases 7 lung cases Calculation time

Evaluation Benchmarking of MC dose calculation for InCise MLC Dose distributions in water -> OCR 115.0 x 100.1 mm 2 Framework and Precision depth = 1.5 cm Agreement between IDC 7.6 x 7.7 mm 2 within 3.1% / 1 mm. 46.2 x 46.2 mm 2 Measurement xxx IDC Framework - - - Precision

Evaluation Benchmarking of MC dose calculation for InCise MLC Dose distributions in water -> TPR Measurement xxx IDC Framework - - - Precision Agreement between IDC Framework and Precision within 2.3% / 1 mm. 115.0 x 100.1 mm 2 46.2 x 46.2 mm 2 7.6 x 7.7 mm 2

Evaluation Benchmarking of MC dose calculation for InCise MLC Dose distributions in lung phantom (CIRS Thorax Phantom) Precision IDC Framework Dose difference

Evaluation Benchmarking of MC dose calculation for InCise MLC Dose distributions in patients (lung case) Dose difference Gamma (2% / 1 mm)

Evaluation Benchmarking of MC dose calculation for InCise MLC Dose distributions in patients

Evaluation Benchmarking of MC dose calculation for InCise MLC Calculation time

Evaluation Benchmarking of MC dose calculation for InCise MLC

Summary Once the FSPB algorithm is commissioned, no additional beam data measurements are needed in order to commission the MC algorithm for the InCise MLC. An in-house independent dose calculation framework (IDC- Framework) was developed and validated against measurements. The accuracy of the MC algorithm within Precision was evaluated by comparing it with the IDC-Framework. The calculation time for a clinically reasonable dose distribution with Monte Carlo is typically below one hour.

Thank you for your attention!