Breast Imaging! Ravi Adhikary, MD!

Similar documents
Tissue Breast Density

Disclosures. Breast Cancer. Breast Imaging Modalities. Breast Cancer Screening. Breast Cancer 6/4/2014

Screening Mammography: The Controversy, Risk Assessment and Individualized Screening recommendations. Jonathan T. Sims MD, MBA

Evaluations & CE Credits

Breast density: imaging, risks and recommendations

MANAGEMENT OF DENSE BREASTS. Nichole K Ingalls, MD, MPH NW Surgical Specialists September 25, 2015

BREAST DENSITY WHAT IS IT? WHY IS IT IMPORTANT? & What IOWA SF250 Means to Patients and Providers

Current Status of Supplementary Screening With Breast Ultrasound

Mammography and Other Screening Tests. for Breast Problems

Melissa Hartman, DO Women s Health Orlando VA Medical Center

Breast Cancer Screening and High Risk

Advances in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment. Heidi Memmel, MD FACS Surgical Director of Caldwell Breast Center September 26, 2015

ROLE OF MRI IN SCREENING, DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF BREAST CANCER. B.Zandi Professor of Radiology

Breast Cancer Screening

Breast density. Understand what it is and why it matters

Supplemental Screening for Dense Breasts. Reagan Leverett, MD, MS

Screening for Breast Cancer

Frequently Asked Questions about Breast Density, Breast Cancer Risk, and the Breast Density Notification Law in California: A Consensus Document

Breast Cancer Imaging

Angela Gilliam, MD University of Colorado Surgical Grand Rounds November 3, 2008

Update in Breast Cancer Screening

Update in Breast Cancer Screening

EARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY

EARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY

Breast Cancer Screening and Treatment Mrs Belinda Scott Breast Surgeon Breast Associates Auckland

CLINICAL GUIDELINES. Screening Mammography Guidelines

Greater Sacramento Chapter Oncology Nursing Society Newsletter

Untangling the Confusion: Multiple Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines and the Ones We Should Follow

S. Murgo, MD. Chr St-Joseph, Mons Erasme Hospital, Brussels

Breast Cancer Screening Clinical Practice Guideline. Kaiser Permanente National Breast Cancer Screening Guideline Development Team

Current Strategies in the Detection of Breast Cancer. Karla Kerlikowske, M.D. Professor of Medicine & Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF

MEDICAL IMAGING AND BREAST DISEASE HOW CAN WE HELP YOU?

Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis

8/31/2016 HIDING IN PLAIN SITE, ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS AND BREAST ASYMMETRIES ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTIONS

Screening Mammograms: Questions and Answers

Breast Health and Imaging Glossary

BI-RADS and Breast MRI. Kathy Borovicka, M.D. Thursday February 15, 2018

Imaging in breast cancer. Mammography and Ultrasound Donya Farrokh.MD Radiologist Mashhad University of Medical Since

Breast Cancer Screening

What s New in Breast Imaging. Jennifer A. Harvey, M.D., FACR Professor of Radiology University of Virginia

Amammography report is a key component of the breast

Standard Breast Imaging Modalities. Lilian Wang, M.D. Breast Imaging Section Department of Radiology Northwestern Medicine

Mammographic imaging of nonpalpable breast lesions. Malai Muttarak, MD Department of Radiology Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai, Thailand

AMSER Case of the Month: September 2018

Breast Density It's the Law

Henda s Law. Supplemental screening for women with dense breast tissue and increased risk

IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BI-RADS Update. Martha B. Mainiero, MD, FACR, FSBI Brown University Rhode Island Hospital

Camelia Davtyan, MD, FACP Clinical Professor of Medicine Director of Women s Health UCLA Comprehensive Health Program

Wellness Along the Cancer Journey: Cancer Types Revised October 2015 Chapter 2: Breast Cancer

Breast Imaging Lexicon

Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer

BREAST MRI. Elizabeth A. Rafferty, M.D. Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School

Leonard M. Glassman MD

The Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Value of Supplemental Screening Tests Following Negative Mammography in Women with Dense Breast Tissue

Breast Thermography A radiation-free breast health assessment suitable for young women By Janet van Dam Medical Thermographer/ Member ACCT

The Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Value of Supplemental Screening Tests Following Negative Mammography in Women with Dense Breast Tissue

BR 1 Palpable breast lump

Breast Imaging & You

Dense Breasts, Get Educated

BREAST CANCER SCREENING:

Dense Breasts. A Breast Cancer Risk Factor and Imaging Challenge

Presented by: Lillian Erdahl, MD

BREAST MRI. Elizabeth A. Rafferty, M.D. Avon Comprehensive Breast Center Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School

Breast Evaluation & Management Guidelines

Breast Cancer Update 2018 The Latest in Diagnosis and Treatment SARATH K, PALAKODETI, DO, FAACS GENERAL, BREAST, AND COSMETIC SURGEON TOLEDO CLINIC

Risk Assessment, Genetics, and Prevention

National Diagnostic Imaging Symposium 2013 SAM - Breast MRI 1

Breast Imaging & You

Emerging Techniques in Breast Imaging: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Fast MRI

Health Quality Ontario The provincial advisor on the quality of health care in Ontario

DR AISHA A UMAR CHIEF CONSULTANT RADIOLOGIST NATIONAL HOSPITAL ABUJA.

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

MR sin plass i brystkreftdiagnostikk, dagens anbefalinger og fremtidsperspektiver

Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR

Ruud Pijnappel Professor of Radiology, UMC Utrecht. Chair Dutch Expert Centre for Screening Board EUSOBI

Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Prevention

Evaluation of BI-RADS 3 lesions in women with a high risk of hereditary breast cancer.

How often should I get a mammogram?

5/24/16. Current Issues in Breast Cancer Screening. Breast cancer screening guidelines. Outline

Assessing Your Patient s Breast Cancer Risk: Is Genetic Testing Necessary?

BREAST MRI. VASILIKI FILIPPI RADIOLOGIST CT MRI & PET/CT Departments Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece

Throughout this policy, bracketed numbers link topics across multiple sections according to the indication numbers in the following list.

Challenges to Delivery of High Quality Mammography

Mary Smania, DNP, FNP-BC Clinical Practice Champion Assistant Professor Michigan State University College of Nursing

Breast Cancer. Common kinds of breast cancer are

WELCOME. Taking Care of Your Health. April 30, 8 am to noon

Financial Disclosures

Improving the Identification of Underserved Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer and Increasing the use of Breast MRI Screening in this Population

Current issues and controversies in breast imaging. Kate Brown, South GP CME 2015

November 23, Dear Maryland Breast and Cervical Cancer Program Provider:

Breast Cancer. American Cancer Society

The best way of detection of and screening for breast cancer in women with genetic or hereditary risk

Imaging Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening

Evaluation & Management of PowerPoint Cover Title. the High Risk Population. High Risk Clinic

Treatment options for the precancerous Atypical Breast lesions. Prof. YOUNG-JIN SUH The Catholic University of Korea

Q: Why is breast cancer a big deal?

Non-mass Enhancement on Breast MRI. Aditi A. Desai, MD Margaret Ann Mays, MD

Case #1: 75 y/o Male (treated and followed by prostate cancer oncology specialist ).

BREAST CANCER d an BREAST SELF EXAM

Transcription:

Breast Imaging! Ravi Adhikary, MD!

ACS Estimated Cancers Statistics 2014! Breast! New Cases in Women! 232,670 (+67,570 in situ)! Deaths in Women! 40,000! Colon! 48,380! 24,040! Cervical! 12,360! 4,020! Lung! 108,210! 72,330! Pancreas! 22,840! 19,420!

Screening Mammography! Women of average breast cancer risk! Annually starting at age 40! Women with an increased risk! BRCA1/2 mutations, or untested with first degree relatives with BRCA! Yearly, starting by age 30, not before 25! >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer by family history, women with mothers and sisters with premenopausal breast cancer! Starting by age age 30, or 10 years earlier than the diagnosis of the youngest affected relative, but not before age 25! History of mantle radiation (for Hodgkin s disease)! Yearly starting 8 years after radiation therapy, not before 25! Women with lobular neoplasia, ADH, DCIS, invasive cancer or ovarian cancer! Yearly from time of diagnosis!

Screening Mammogram! Trial! Age! Follow-up years! Mortality Reduction! Health Insurance Plan of Greater NY (1963-1969)! Malmo Mammographic Screening (1976-1986)! Swedish Two County Trial (1979-1988)! Edinburgh Trial (1979-1988)! Canadian National Breast Screening Study (1980-1987)! Stockholm trial (1981-1985)! Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial (1982-1988)! 40-64! 18! 23%! 45-69! 18-24! 19%! 40-74! 20! 32%! 45-64! 14! 29%! 50-59! 13! -2%! 40-64! 8! 20%! 40-59! 14! 23%! UK Age Trial (1991-2005)! 39-41! 10! 17%!

Mammogram! Masses! Calcifications! Architectural distortion! Asymmetries! Other features!

Breast Density! A: Almost entirely fatty! B: Scattered areas of fibroglandular density! C: Heterogenously Dense! D: Extremely dense!

Potential Problems With Dense Breast Tissue! Increased Relative Risk! Category D vs A: 4 to 6! Category C vs average: < 1.2! Category D vs average: <2.1! Decreased sensitivity of mammography! Category D vs A: Sensitivity decreased 26%! Category C vs average: Sensitivity decreased 7%! Category D vs average: Sensitivity decreased 13%!

Breast Density Legislation! Women with dense or heterogeneously dense breast tissue receive a letter! New York State has passed legislation and letters have been going out since 2013!

New York State Law! Your mammogram shows that your breast tissue is dense. Dense breast tissue is very common and is not abnormal. However, dense breast tissue can make it harder to find cancer on a mammogram and may also be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.! This information about the result of your mammogram is given to you to raise your awareness. Use this information to talk to your doctor about your own risks for breast cancer. At that time, ask your doctor if more screening tests might be useful, based on your risk. A report of your results was sent to your physician.!

Possible Approaches! No further screening! Additional screening with ultrasound and MRI! Benefits may be found in those women who have other risk factors beyond just density!

Ultrasound Screening! In 6 studies conducted between between 1995-2008 evaluating ultrasound screening:! Involving 40,544 women! Cancer detection ranged from 2.3-4.6/1000 screened, overall 3.4/1000! Mean size of cancer ranged from 9.1-11 mm! 83%-100% of cancers found to be invasive! 86%-100% of cancers found to be node negative!

Ultrasound Screening! Cancers found in screeners:! Low risk! 1.6/1000! Intermediate Risk! 6.7/1000! High risk! 11.5/1000!

Ultrasound Screening! Pros! Does not require ionizing radiation! No intravenous contrast required! Well tolerated by patient! Availability! Relatively inexpensive! Cons! Does depend on operator! High rate of BI-RADS 3 lesions! Positive predictive value of biopsies is low! Yield of cancer in those women of low risk other than breast density is relatively low!

Breast Ultrasound! Masses! Calcifications! Other findings!

MRI Screening! Not just for dense breasts! High risk groups! Generally starting by age 30! 10 years before! >20-25% lifetime risk of breast cancer! BRCA carriers, 1st degree relative of BRCA carrier! Chest radiation (for Hodgkin s disease)!

MRI Screening! EVA Trial! Multicenter study! Evaluate contribution of MG, US, MRI! 687 women with >20% lifetime risk! Cancer yield! MG: 5.4! US: 6.0! MG + US: 7.7! MRI: 14.9! MG + MRI: 16.0! MG + MRI + US: 16.0!

MRI Screening! Those with claustrophobia may not be able to tolerate the exam! Pacemaker! Renal function! Contrast allergy! Limited availability! Expensive!

Breast MRI! Mass! Non mass enhancement! Focus! Other findings!

BI-RADS Assessment! Assessment! Management! Likelihood of Cancer! Category 0: Incomplete! Recall for additional imaging and/or comparison with priors! N/A! Category 1: Negative! Routine Screening! Essentially 0%! Category 2: Benign! Routine Screening! Essentially 0%! Category 3: Probably benign! Short interval follow-up! >2%! Category 4: Suspicious! Tissue diagnosis! 2%-95%! 4A: 2%-9%! 4B: 10%49%! 4C: 50-49%! Category 5: Highly suggestive of malignancy! Tissue Diagnosis! >95%! Category 6: Known biopsy-proven malignancy! Surgical excision when appropriate! N/A!