Radiant NDT Services

Similar documents
An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company

API. Generic Procedure. for the. Ultrasonic Examination. Ferritic Welds

1. SCOPE ELIGIBILITY EXAMINATION CONTENT RENEWAL & RECERTIFICATION PROCEDURE ESSENTIAL READING...

LIQUID PENETRANT EXAMINATION PROCEDURE

API. Defined Procedure. for. Ultrasonic Thickness Measurement API-UT-21

Manual Ultrasonic Inspection of Thin Metal Welds

PART 1c: Time of Flight Diffraction Ultrasonic Inspector (TOFD) of Welds in Ferritic and Non-Ferritic Materials, Levels 1, 2 and 3

Ultrasonic Testing Level I:

Employer s Unit of Competence Ultrasonic testing of materials, products and plant

We are providing Level I, II Training and Certification as per Recommended practice SNT TC 1A 2006 in the following NDT Methods.

Case studies on uncertainties of ultrasonic weld testing interpretation

Nondestructive Testing Procedure: Liquid Penetrant Testing

Performance of phased array and conventional ultrasonic probes on the new ISO reference block

CRACK DETECTION AND PIPELINE INTEGRITY SOLUTIONS

Ultrasonic Testing (UT) Level 2

PART 1b: Automated Ultrasonic Girth Weld Inspection and Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing, Levels 1, 2 and 3

COWLEY COLLEGE & Area Vocational Technical School

Joint Geometry Indications in Conventional Ultrasonic Tests and Phased Array Tests

COURSE DESCRIPTION FOR NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING

APPLICATION AND DEPLOYMENT OF ADVANCED NDE TECHNIQUES IN HIGH PRESSURE VESSELS

Flaw Assessment Using Shear wave Phased array Ultrasonic Transducer

THE DEVELOPMENT AND MANUFACTURE OF FIXED- ULTRASONIC INSPECTION REFERENCE REFLECTORS AND TRANSDUCERS FOR COMPRESSOR BLADE DOVETAILS

Table 1: Samples used in experimental program. Block ID/thickness [ mm ]

HAND HELD ULTRASONIC SIZING OF STRESS CORROSION CRACKING

ADVANCEMENTS IN NON DESTRUCTIVE TESTING

INSPECTION THROUGH AN OVERLAY REPAIR WITH A SMART FLEXIBLE ARRAY PROBE.

Nondestructive testing course structure

10 Years Experience in Industrial Phased Array Testing of Rolled Bars

September 27, DOE-RL-92-36, Hanford Site Hoisting and Rigging Manual HOOKS. Page 1 CONTENTS

Qualification of Manual Phased Array Ultrasonic Techniques for Pipe Weld Inspection in Nuclear Power Plants

Optimization of Phased-Array Transducers for Ultrasonic Inspection in Composite Materials Using Sliding Probes

The Evolution and Benefits of Phased Array Technology for the Every Day Inspector

Hand Held Ultrasonic Sizing of Stress Corrosion Cracking

FAST UT, A NEW ULTRASONIC INSPECTION TECHNIQUE

5. LIQUID PENETRANT TESTING (PT) : LEVEL I ( 4 DAYS )

ADVANCED PHASED ARRAY TECHNOLOGIES

CERTIFICATION OF PERSONNEL FOR ULTRASONIC TESTING OF CASTINGS

The scheduled dates for NDT Inspector Certification Examination are as below:

Shcherbakov O.N., Petrov A.E., Polevoy A.G., Annenkov A.S. ULTES LLC, Moscow, Russia

Magnetic Testing (MT) Level 2

A Novel Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing (PAUT) System for On-Site Inspection of Welded Joints in Plastic Pipes

Innovative NDT Solutions. Ultrasonic Sensor Technology Phased-Array Search Units. An AREVA and Siemens company

Introduction. Table of Contents

Ultrasonic Testing of Composite Structures

COWLEY COLLEGE & Area Vocational Technical School

MANUAL PHASED ARRAY ULTRASONIC TECHNIC FOR PIPE WELD INSPECTION IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

Application of Time Reversal Technique for the Inspection of Composite Structures

RELIABILITY of NON-DESTRUCTIVE TESTING RESULTS of WELDED JOINTS

Pipeline Technology Conference 2007

Automated ultrasonic testing of submerged-arc welded (SAW) pipes using phased-arrays

Non-Destructive Inspection of Composite Wrapped Thick-Wall Cylinders

Qualification of ultrasonic testing of Cat ridged dump trucks ball studs from the inferior position of the stud

Advanced Radiographic Testing (RT) Level 2.9

Developments in Ultrasonic Inspection II

Ultrasonic arrays are now widely used in underwater sonar

Ultrasonic Thickness Procedure Pulse-Echo Thickness Gage TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1.0 Introduction Reference Documents Summary of Practice 2

Ultrasonic Testing courses at DGZfP Education and Training Ltd

NTS ULTRASONICS PTY LTD (N

Evaluation of the Quality of Thick Fibre Composites Using Immersion and Air- Coupled Ultrasonic Techniques

TTU Phased Array: Quality and Productivity

COWLEY COLLEGE & Area Vocational Technical School

AIRWORTHINESS ADVISORY CIRCULAR

w. D. Jolly, F. A. Bruton, and C. Fedor

Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing

SPECIALIZED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES: WELDING AND NON DESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF AERONAUTICAL PRODUCTS

Global Inspection and Certifications (GIC) (Learn Today Lead Tomorrow)

Trusts and Beliefs in UT of Girth Welds

NDT Services Division

Eddy Current Testing Level 1

Presentation of a system for AUT on Pipelines and Penstock THE PIPERUNNER

Field inspection of Phase-Array ultrasonic for polyethylene electrofusion joints

Ultrasonic Phased Array Inspection Technique Development Tools

ADVANCED NDE TECHNIQUES AND THEIR DEPLOYMENT ON HIGH PRESSURE EQUIPMENT

Other Major Component Inspection II

ULTRASONIC ARRAY APPROACH FOR THE EVALUATION OF ELECTROFUSION JOINTS OF POLYETHYLENE GAS PIPING

Reliability Analysis of the Phased-Array Ultrasonic System used for the Inspection of Friction Stir Welds of Copper Canisters

Ultrasonic Phased Array Testing of Complex Aircraft Structures

Global Standards Engineering Policy & Procedure

A CONTRIBUTION TO QUANTIFYING THE SOURCES OF ERRORS IN PAUT

Descriptions of NDT Projects Fall 2004 October 31, 2004

Inspection Qualification II

ADVANCE ULTRASONIC INSPECTION

Pressure Vessel Inspections Using Ultrasonic Phased Arrays By Michael Moles, Noël Dubé and Frédéric Jacques

Phased Array Ultrasonics and Eddy Current Examination for Graphite Components

SUITABILITY OF NON DESTRUCTIVE TECHNIQUES FOR TESTING POLYETHYLENE PIPE JOINTS. Peter J. Postma, René J.M. Hermkens, Kiwa Technology, The Netherlands

FINAL REPORT BDK Submitted to

ACOUSTORAPHY Acousto-Optical (AO) Ultrasonics & Its Applications

Ultrasonic Testing of Rails Using Phased Array

equipment FOR automated UltRasONIC testing OF plates ematest-pl

Ultrasonic Inspection of Adhesive Joints of Composite Pipelines

AN EMPLOYERS GUIDE TO NDT PERSONNEL CERTIFICATION

Are we ready for the switch over?

NDT 2010 Conference Topics

PCN-ISO GEN Requirements for the Qualification of personnel for Limited Applications of Non-destructive Testing

DEVELOPMENT OF ULTRASONIC TESTING TECHNIQUE TO INSPECT CONTAINMENT LINERS EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE ON NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

National Certification Board

Controlling the risk due to the use of gamma sources for NDT First feedback from the deployment of replacement NDT Techniques

Real Time 2D Ultrasound Camera Imaging: A Higher Resolution Option to Phased Array Bob Lasser Randy Scheib Imperium, Inc.

The Electronic Newsletter of The Industrial Refrigeration Consortium Vol. 11 No. 4, 2011

ADVENCED NON DESTRUCTIVE TESTING

Transcription:

NDT Procedure for Ultrasonic Inspection NDT Procedure suitable for General Ultrasonic Inspections. This is a sample UT procedure and may be required to be modified as per Clients / Projects / Specific requirements. Procedure No: RNS-DOC-UT-05 Rev 00 Radiant NDT Services An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company 50, Rishi Arobindo Sarani, Kolkata-700090, INDIA Telefax:+91-33-25313143, Mobile:+91 9874493331. E-mail: radiandtntkol@gamil.com, Website: www.radiantndtservices.com Aerospace & General NDT ǀ Training & Certification ǀ Welding Inspection ǀ ASNT NDT Level III Consulting ǀ Sales This NDT Inspection Procedure & other NDT procedures are available for free download at www.radiantndtservices.com Oil Field, Power Plant & Aerospace NDT ǀ Advance NDT PA & TOFD ǀ Training & Certification ǀ Welding Inspection ǀ *ǀ ASNT NDT Level III Consulting ǀ*

Radiant NDT Services An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Company PROCEDURE FOR ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION Procedure No. RNS-Doc-UT-05 Rev 00 1. Scope : 1.1 Ultrasonic Examination is an effective means for determination of thicknesses as well as detecting planar and volumetric discontinuities. 1.2 This Non-destructive Examination Procedure details the minimum requirements for conducting Ultrasonic Examination of welded joints, associated heat affected zone and base metal. 1.3 This Procedure is primarily intended for application on welds and adjacent heat affected zone made of steel or ferritic materials; however, the Procedure may be applied to welds and HAZ made of other materials and base metal product forms subject to the qualification by satisfactory demonstration and revision of the procedure. 1.4 This Procedure can be used on weld thick nesses varying between 5 mm and 150 mm (of steel). 1.5 The extent of examination shall be as per applicable construction-code requirements / project specifications and client directives. 1.6 Typical types of discontinuities that can be detected by this method are cracks, incomplete fusion, incomplete penetration, misalignment, overlap, porosity, root-concavity, undercut, burn-through, excessive/ inadequate reinforcement, laminations, inclusions, etc. 2. Reference : 2.1 This Procedure refers to the following: ASME Code Section V-Non Destructive Examination, applicable edition/addenda. ASME Code Section I, for acceptance criteria. ASME Code Section VIII, Div 1 for acceptance criteria. ANSI/ASME B31.1, applicable edition/addenda, for acceptance criteria. ANSI/ASME B31.3, applicable edition/addenda, for acceptance criteria. AWS D1.1- applicable edition. Clients specification requirements for acceptance criteria. 3. Definitions: ASNT: American Society for Non-Destructive Testing. ASME: American Society for Mechanical Engineers. DAC: Distance Amplitude Correction. NDE: Non-Destructive Examination. IIW : The International Institute of Welding. 4. Responsibilities: The NDE Examiner shall be responsible for conducting and reporting the results of examination in accordance with the applicable Code and Client s specifications, whichever is more restrictive.

Radiant NDT Services Procedure for Ultrasonic Examination Page 2 of 11 5. Personnel Qualifications: All personnel involved in Ultrasonic Examinations shall be qualified to Level II in accordance with the requirements of Trinity NDT, Written Practice (Training, Qualification & Certification for NDE Personnel). When the written practice is revised, the certification of NDE personnel remains valid to the requirements of the previous revision until the expiry date of the personnel qualification certificate; then, recertification to the requirements of the new revision is required. Subcontractor s personnel involved in Ultrasonic Examinations shall be qualified to Level II in accordance with the requirements of subcontractor s written practice which shall be reviewed and accepted by Radiant NDT QA/QC Manager. The certification of personnel shall be checked by the QA/QC Manager or NDE Level III prior to work commencement. 6. Procedure: 6.1 Equipment: 6.1.1 Ultrasonic examination equipment shall be of the pulse echo type utilizing A scan presentation, capable of generating and receiving frequencies between 1 and 5 MHz as a minimum and shall be capable of recording UT data including the scanning positions. 6.1.2 The flaw detector shall be calibrated in accordance with the relevant calibration procedure. A certificate of conformance shall accompany each flaw detector. 6.1.3 The ultrasonic instrument shall provide linear vertical presentation within ± 5% of the full screen height (FSH) for 20% to 80% FSH and to be recorded in Screen Height Linearity Record Form No. RNS-UT-Doc-05 Rev 00, The procedure for evaluating screen height linearity is carried out as per ASME section V, article 4, appendix I ( AWS D1.1-6.30). 6.1.4 The ultrasonic instrument shall utilize an amplitude control accurate over its useful range to 20% of the nominal amplitude ratio, to allow measurement of indications beyond the linear range of the vertical display on the screen. The procedure for evaluating amplitude control linearity shall be performed as per ASME section V, Article 4, appendix II. And to be recorded in Amplitude Control Linearity Form No. RNS-UT-Doc-05 Rev 00. 6.1.5 The requirements of 6.1.3 and 6.1..4 above; shall be met at intervals not to exceed three months for analogue type instruments and one year for digital type instrument, or prior to first use thereafter. 6.1.6 When any part of the examination system is changed, a calibration check shall be made on the basic calibration block to verify that distance range points and sensitivity setting (s) satisfy the requirements of ASME section V, T-466.3. 6.1.7 A calibration check on at least one of the reflectors in the basic calibration block shall be performed at the completion of each examination or series of similar examinations, and when examination personnel are changed. The distance range and sensitivity values recorded shall satisfy the requirements of ASME section V, T-466.3. 6.1.8 If during any check, it is determined that the examination equipment is not functioning properly, all of the product that has been examined since the last valid equipment calibration shall be re-examined.

Radiant NDT Services Procedure for Ultrasonic Examination Page 3 of 11 6.2 Materials: 6.2.1 Search units shall be electrically matched to the flaw detector. 6.2.2 Search units shall be in the frequency range 1 MHz to 5 MHz and be free of noise and internal reflections. Twin or single transducer elements may be used dependent upon the configuration of weld under examination. 6.2.2.1 In case of AWS D1.1 Straight-beam Search unit transducers shall have an active area of not less than 1/2in² nor shall more than 1 in².the transducer be round or square. Angle-Beam Search Units shall consist of a transducer and an angle wedge. The unit may be comprised of the two separate elements or may be an integral unit. Search Units shall be square or rectangular in shape and may vary from 5/8in to 1in in width and from 5/8in to13/16in in height. The search unit shall produce a sound beam in the material being tested within±2 of one of the following 45,60 & 70. The transducer frequency shall be between 2 and 2.5 MHz. 6.2.3 Search units with contoured contact wedges may be used to aid the ultrasonic coupling. Calibration shall be done with the contact wedges used during the examination. 6.2.4 Each flaw detector shall have a full set of search units with cables; the search units shall be of type, size and frequency, as required by the governing specification. 6.2.5 Calibration blocks shall include but not be limited to IIW V2 UT reference Block. The operator shall also have access to IIW-V1, and such others that may be required to ensure compliance with regard to calibration of flaw detector and probe characteristics, e.g. beam angle, beam profile, exit point (index) etc. 6.2.5.1 In case of AWS D1.1 the IIW UT reference block shall be the standard used for both distance and sensitivity calibration. 6.2.6 Basic Calibration Block Material shall be of the same product form, and material specification or equivalent P-Number grouping as one of the materials being examined. For the purpose of this procedure P-Numbers 1, 3, 4, and 5 materials are considered equivalent. The calibration block shall have the same heat treatment specification for the type and grade and also have the same surface finish. 6.2.7 Measurements of beam spread for scan indexing limits shall be taken only when required by a referencing code section. Beam spread angles shall be measured once for a search unit wedge combination in the calculated far field at the beginning of each period of extended use, or every 3 months, whichever is less. 6.2.8 Search units with worn faces shall not be used. 6.2.9 Couplant shall be used to give the maximum acoustic transmission between the probe face and the material under examination. The couplant shall be cellulose paste, liquid soap, oil, or grease. In all cases the couplant including additive, shall not be detrimental to the material being examined. 6.3 Surface Condition: 6.3.1 Welds that are being examined using ultrasound shall be prepared to provide a sufficiently smooth and regular area for scanning to be undertaken. The area shall extend at least the full skip distance required, and shall be free of any irregularities such as spatter, grinding or chipping marks scale, etc., which may hinder the scanning pattern or cause confusion in the interpretation of the resultant display i.e. excessive surface noise.

Radiant NDT Services Procedure for Ultrasonic Examination Page 4 of 11 6.4 Technical Information: 6.4.1 Prior to commencement of examination, the following information shall be obtained: Type of material. (as per project requirements) Joint configuration. (as per as built drawings) Welding Process (as per WPS) Pre heating ( as per WPS requirements) Post weld heat treatment (PWHT), etc. 6.5 Examination Procedure : 6.5.1 For examinations in materials where the examination surface diameter is greater than 20 in. (508 mm), a block of essentially the same curvature shall be used, or alternatively, a flat basic calibration block, may be used, provided that, gain correction shall be adjusted as described in code section V, Article 4, Appendix B. 6.5.2 For examination in materials where the examination surface diameter is 20 in. (508 mm), or less, the calibration block shall be curved. Except where otherwise stated in the reference code, a single curved basic calibration block may be used to calibrate the examination on surfaces in the range of curvature from 0.9 to 1.5 times the basic calibration block diameter. 6.5.3 The scanning shall be 100%.The entire volume shall be examined with a 10% overlap of the probe. The rate of search unit movement for examination shall not exceed 6 inches per second (152mm/sec) unless calibration is verified at scanning speed. 6.5.4 For reflectors oriented transverse to the weld the scanning shall be done parallel to the weld axis. If the weld is not ground flushed the probe shall be controlled such that it faces nearly parallel to the weld body. The search unit shall be manipulated so that the ultrasonic energy passes through the required volume of weld and adjacent base material. The search unit shall be rotated 180 deg and the examination repeated. If the weld cap is not ground flat, the examination shall be performed from the base metal on both sides of the weld cap in both weld axis directions. 6.5.5 Calibration: 6.5.5.1 Straight Beam Calibration (0 Probe): (A) The equipment is calibrated using a straight beam probe for a suitable range for the thickness of material being examined. A minimum of two back wall echoes from the material under test be noted during the examination. (B) A Distance Amplitude Correction curve (DAC curve) shall be produced using the appropriate calibration block. The gain control is adjusted to produce a response of 80% full screen height and the screen is marked. Then the probe is re-positioned to give the maximized response for each of the remaining holes. At each maximized position, mark the position of maximum response on the screen. Connect the screen marks to produce the DAC curve. This gain setting is primary reference level.

Radiant NDT Services Procedure for Ultrasonic Examination Page 5 of 11 6.5.5.2 Angle Beam Calibration: (A) The equipment is calibrated for a suitable range for the beam path length required to satisfactorily complete the examination, (i.e. Full Skip Distance). (B) Produce a DAC curve in accordance with paragraph 6.5.5.1(B). 6.5.5.3 System calibration shall be carried out at the commencement of and at 4 hourly intervals during, the inspection and on completion of an inspection. If during the calibration confirmation the sweep range of the DAC curve has changed by the following tolerances: Sweep Range: If a point of the DAC curve has moved on the time base by more than 10% of its original time base position. DAC Curve: If a point on DAC curve has changed by ± 20% or 2 db from its original amplitude. Then the following action shall be taken: 6.5.6 Inspection Technique: 6.5.6.1 Parent Metal Examination Prior to any examination of the weldments, the parent material shall be examined. A compression wave 0 examination will be carried out for a minimum of 3 in. (75 mm) either side of the weld to locate any flaws in the parent material and to determine its thickness. 6.5.6.2 Weld Examination. Plate and Pipe Welds A critical root scan shall be carried out from both sides of the weld, with at least one angle probe directed essentially perpendicular to the weld axis so as to distinguish between root variations and the existence of root cracks or crack-like defects. This may be done where practicable with the aid of a magnetic strip placed so that the distance from the probe index to the root will be constant. The body and fusion faces of the weld shall then be examined using a continuous scanning raster from both sides of the weld between the weld center line or the cap edge whichever is appropriate and full skip plus the cap width using at least two probes of differing angles. 6.5.7 Scanning: 6.5.7.1 A Datum reference point shall be clearly marked on the work-piece and shall be marked with the weld identification. The datum shall be used for a reference for locating defects, and the reporting of defects. 6.5.7.2 The weld and base metal shall be scanned, where required by the referencing code section to the extent possible with the straight beam search unit. 6.5.7.3 Angle beam scanning shall be performed at a gain setting at least two times the primary reference level. Evaluation shall be performed with respect to the primary reference level. 6.5.7.4 The angle beam shall be directed at approximate right angles to the weld axis from two directions where possible to detect discontinuities oriented parallel to the weld axis.

Radiant NDT Services Procedure for Ultrasonic Examination Page 6 of 11 6.5.7.5 The angle beam shall be directed essentially parallel to the weld axis and shall be manipulated so that the angle beam passes through the required volumes of weld and adjacent base metal specified by the referencing code in order to detect discontinuities oriented transverse to the weld axis. The search unit shall be rotated 180º and the examination shall be repeated. 6.5.7.6 The rate of search unit movement for examination shall not exceed 6 in. /sec. unless calibration is verified at scanning speed. 6.5.8 In case of AWS D1.1 The testing angle and scanning procedure shall be in conformance with those in AWS D1.1 Table 6.7. The Indication Rating d represents the algebraic difference in decibels between the indication level and the deference level with correction for attenuation as indicated in the following expression. Instruments with gain in db: a - b c = d 6.6 Defect Evaluation And Sizing : 6.6.1 Any imperfection which causes an indication in excess of 20% DAC shall be investigated to the extent that it can be evaluated in terms of the acceptance standards of the referencing code section. The indication shall be investigated to: Confirm its existence. Determine its location with reference to thestablished datum points. Determine its size. Determine its nature. This investigation may require scanning from other positions and with different probes. It is highly subjective in its nature and should be carried out with extreme care. The recommended sizing techniques are as follows: Defect Length Use the 6 db drop method, marking the probe centre at the defect end points. Through Thickness Dimension Use the 20 db technique in conjunction with an adjustable flaw location slide. The recording levels and rejection levels shall be in accordance with the referencing Code or standard. All defects shall be assessed in accordance with the requirements of the applicable referencing Code Section. 6.6.2 In case of AWS D1.1 Each weld discontinuity shall be accepted or rejected on the basis of its indication rating and its length, in conformance with AWS D1.1 Table 6.2 for statically loaded structures or Table 6.3 for cyclically loaded structures. The length of such indication shall be determined by measuring the distance between the transducer centerline locations where the indication rating amplitude drops 50%(6 db) below the rating for the applicable discontinuity classification.this length shall be recorded under discontinuity length.

Radiant NDT Service Procedure for Ultrasonic Examination Page 7 of 11 6.7 Acceptance Standards 6.7.1 ASME Code, Sec. I Paragraph PW-52. 6.7.2 ASME Code, Sec. VIII Div 1 (Mandatory Appendix 12). 6.7.3 ASME B31.1 Paragraph (136.4.6). 6.7.4 AWS D1.1,Clause 6.Table 6.2 and 6.3 6.8 Reporting 6.8.1 Upon completion of the examination the examiner shall prepare an examination report, for each weld or area of weld examined, using Ultrasonic Examination Report - Form No. RNS-UTR-05 Rev00. All restrictions which limit the effectiveness of the test must be recorded. 6.8.2 All reflectors greater than 50% of the reference level shall be reported and shall be described with regard to size, shape, location and probable identity/classification. 6.8.3 In addition, sketches and drawings shall be prepared to support written descriptions. 7. Attachments: 7.1 Ultrasonic Examination Report 7.2 Screen Height Linearity Record 7.3 Amplitude Control Linearity Record

Radiant NDT Service Procedure for Ultrasonic Examination Page 8 of 11 MANDATORY ANNEXURE I LINEARITY CHECKS Fig. MA II-1 Screen Height Linearity: Position an angle beam search unit on a calibration block similar to that shown in Fig. MA II-1 so that indications from both the ½ and ¾ T holes give a 2:1 ratio of amplitudes between the two indications. Adjust the sensitivity (gain) so that the larger indication is set at 80% of full screen height (FSH). Without moving the search unit, adjust sensitivity (gain) to successively set the larger indication from 100% to 20% of full screen height, in 10% increments (or 2 db steps if a fine control is not available), and read the smaller indication at each setting. The reading shall be 50% of the larger amplitude, within 5% of FSH. The settings and readings shall be estimated to the nearest 1% of full screen. Alternatively, a straight beam search unit may be used on any calibration bloc that provides amplitude differences, with sufficient signal separation to prevent overlapping of the two signals. Amplitude Control Linearity: Position an angle beam search unit on a basic calibration block, as shown in Fig. MA II-1 so that the indication from the ½T side-drilled hole is peaked on the screen. Adjust the sensitivity (gain) as shown in the following table. The indication shall fall within the specified limits. Alternatively, any other convenient reflector from any calibration block may be used with angle or straight beam search units. The settings and readings shall be estimated to the nearest 1 % of full screen. Indication Set at % of Full Screen db Control Change Indication Limits % of Full Screen 80 % -6 db 32 to 48 % 80 % -12 db 16 to 24 % 40 % +6 db 64 to 96 % 20 % +12 db 64 to 96 %

Radiant NDT Service Procedure for Ultrasonic Examination Page 9 of 11 NON-MANDATORY ANNEXURE II Sample Acceptance Criteria (Note: Information provided in this annexure is for guidance only; users are encouraged to refer the relevant standards / codes for specific acceptance criteria. These acceptance criteria apply unless other more restrictive standards are specified for specific materials or applications within the Code Sections / Divisions). ASME Section VIII (as per App 12) Imperfections, which produce a response greater than 20% of the reference level, shall be investigated to the extent that the operator can determine the shape, identity, and location of all such imperfections and evaluate them in terms of acceptance standards given below: Indications characterized as Crack, Lack of Fusion, or Incomplete Penetration are unacceptable regardless of length Other imperfections whose indications exceed the reference level and which have their length exceeding the following are unacceptable: ¼ (6 mm) for t up to ¾ (19 mm) t/3 for t from ¾ to 2¼ (19 mm to 57 mm) ¾ for t over 2¼ (57 mm) where t is the thickness of the weld excluding any allowable reinforcement. For a butt weld joining two members having different thicknesses at the weld, t is the thinner of these two thicknesses. If a full penetration weld includes a fillet weld, the thickness of the throat of the fillet shall be included in t. A record of repaired areas shall be noted as well as the results of the reexamination of the repaired areas. A record of all reflections from uncorrected areas having responses that exceed 50% of the reference level shall be prepared; such record shall show the location of each area, response level, the dimensions, the depth below the surface, and the classification in accordance with para. 19.1.21. ASME B 31.1: POWER PIPING (Para 136.4.6): Welds that are shown by ultrasonic examination to have discontinuities, which produce a response greater than 20% of the reference level, shall be investigated to the extent that the operator can determine their shape, identity & location and evaluate them in terms of acceptance standards given below: A1: Discontinuities evaluated as cracks, lack of fusion or incomplete penetrations are unacceptable regardless of length. Other discontinuities whose indications exceed the reference level and which have their length exceeding the following are unacceptable: 1/4 th inch (6mm) for t up to 3/4 th inch. t/3 for t from 3/4 th to 2-1/4 th inches (19mm to 57mm) 3/4 th inch for t over 2-1/4 th inches (57mm) where t is the thickness of the weld. For a butt weld joining two members having different thicknesses at the weld, t is the thinner of the two thicknesses.

Radiant NDT Service Procedure for Ultrasonic Examination Page 10 of 11 RADIANT NDT SERVICES DATE OF TEST: Client: 50, RISHI AROBINDO SARANI, Kolkata -700090, INDIA. TEL.NO. (9133) 25313143 FAX NO.: (9133) 6225830 REPORT No. : Page of Date : ULTRASONIC INSPECTION REPORT Job no.: Location: Drawing no.: Connecting Cable type & length: Item ID: Project: Special attachment/ equipment: Calibration Block No. Thickness: Reference Reflectors: DAC settings: Prob e Reflector no. %Echo Beam path Reflector no. %Echo Beam path Reflector no. %Echo Beam path Damping/ reject setting: PROBE TYPE Make Sr. no. Crystal Size Frequency MHz Primary Reference db Scanning Sensitivity Test Range (mm) Access Limitations (if any) RESULT : SEE NEXT PAGE. 0 o TR 45 o 60 o 70 o Technician: Client rep.: AI / TPI. Level: Name: Name: SPECIFICATION: UT procedure & revision: Flaw detector: Serial no.: Calibration certification no.: Base metal type & thickness: Weld type/ configuration: Couplant brand name & type: Surface condition/ preparation: Scan Face: Signature & Date: Signature & Date Signature & Date:

Radiant NDT Service Procedure for Ultrasonic Examination Page 11 of 11 SAMPLE REPORT FORMAT RADIANT NDT SERVICES DATE. OF TEST: REPORT NO.: PAGE OF START TIME: P.O. 700090, 50-RISHI AROBINDO SARANI, INDIA. TEL.NO. (9133) 25313143 FAX NO.: (9133) 28731969 END TIME: Location : ULTRASONIC INSPECTION REPORT (CONTINUATION SHEET) WELD I.D. WELDERS I.D. DRAW NO./ SIZE REMARKS RESULTS ACCEPT REJECT TECHNICIAN: CLIENT REP.: AI / TPI.: ASNT Level II : NAME: NAME: SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE: DATE: DATE: DATE: