Anticoagulation Task Force

Similar documents
The INR: No Need Anymore? Daniel Blanchard, MD Professor of Medicine Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program UCSD Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center

The INR: No Need Anymore? Daniel Blanchard, MD Professor of Medicine Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program UCSD Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center

What s new with DOACs? Defining place in therapy for edoxaban &

Update on Oral Anticoagulants. Dr. Miten R. Patel Cancer Specialists of North Florida Cell

Reversal of Novel Oral Anticoagulants. Angelina The, MD March 22, 2016

6 th ACC-SHA Joint Meeting Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Direct Oral Anticoagulants An Update

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Reversal

Afib, Stroke, and DOAC. Albert Luo, MD. Cardiology Lindsey Frischmann, DO. Neurology Xiao Cai, MD. HBS

Updates in Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism

3/25/2016. Objectives for Pharmacists. Stop the Bleeding! New Reversal Agents. Objectives for Pharmacy Technicians. Assessment Pre-test

Oral Anticoagulation Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

New Anticoagulants Therapies

Update on the NOAC s: 2018 Daniel Blanchard, MD, FACC, FAHA

INR as a Biomarker: Anticoagulation in Atrial Fib, Heart Failure, and Cardiovascular Disease Daniel Blanchard, MD, FACC, FAHA

Oral Anticoagulants Update. Elizabeth Renner, PharmD, BCPS, BCACP, CACP Outpatient Cardiology and Anticoagulation

Managing Bleeding in the Patient on DOACs

Reversal Agents for Anticoagulants Understanding the Options. Katisha Vance, MD, FACP Alabama Oncology January 28, 2017

Reversal Agents for NOACs (Novel Oral Anticoagulants)

Challenging Anticoagulation Case Studies. Earl J. Hope, M.D. Tower Health Cardiology

NOACS/DOACS*: COMPARISON AND FREQUENTLY-ASKED QUESTIONS

Professional Practice Minutes December 7, 2016

Drug Class Monograph

Do s and Don t of DOACs DISCLOSURE

Edoxaban. Direct Xa inhibitor Direct thrombin inhibitor Direct Xa inhibitor Direct Xa inhibitor

Novel Anticoagulants: Emerging Evidence

Drug Class Review Newer Oral Anticoagulant Drugs

ADVANCES IN ANTICOAGULATION

NEW/NOVEL ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS (NOACS): COMPARISON AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Advances in Anticoagulation

Novel Oral An,coagulants: Prac,cal Aspects. Caroline Berube, MD Clinical Associate Professor Division of Hematology November 2015

True/False: Idarucizumab can be utilized for the management of bleeding associated with dabigatran.

Introduction. Blood Pressure

Individualizing VTE Treatment and Prevention of Recurrence: The Place for Direct Oral Anticoagulants in VTE

Role of NOACs in AF Management. From Evidence to Real World Data Focus on Cardioversion

Comparison of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs)

Discuss the role of idarucizumab for the management of bleeding associated with dabigatran

Clinical issues which drug for which patient

Xarelto (rivaroxaban)

Atrial Fibrillation: Risk Stratification and Treatment New Cardiovascular Horizons St. Louis September 19, 2015

The DOACs. Update on Anticoagulation 10/20/2017. Dabigatran (Pradaxa ) Rivaroxaban (Xarelto ) Apixaban (Eliquis ) Edoxaban (Savaysa ) Objectives

Pros and Cons of Individual Agents Based on Large Trial Results: RELY, ROCKET, ARISTOTLE, AVERROES

Practical Considerations for Using Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes in the context of the direct acting oral anticoagulants

Individual Therapeutic Selection Of Anti-coagulants And Periprocedural. Miguel Valderrábano, MD

Guideline for Treatment of Head Injury in the Anticoagulated Patient

DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS

The Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Practical Considerations. David Garcia, MD University of Washington Seattle Cancer Care Alliance September 2015

ESC Congress 2012, Munich

FACTOR Xa AND PAR-1 BLOCKER : ATLAS-2, APPRAISE-2 & TRACER TRIALS

Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal Pollack CV, Reilly PA, Eikelboom J, et al. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(6):

Nibal R. Chamoun, Pharm.D., BCPS Clinical Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice at the Lebanese American University Clinical Pharmacy Coordinator

Anticoagulation with Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and advances in peri-procedural interruption of anticoagulation-- Bridging

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

Stroke Prophylaxis in AFib. Anil K. Gehi, MD Associate Professor of Medicine

Chapter 1 Introduction

Dr Calum Young Cardiologist Tauranga

Asif Serajian DO FACC FSCAI

ANTI-THROMBOTIC THERAPY in NON-VALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Global Anticoagulants Market: Size, Trends & Forecasts ( ) April 2017

Anticoagulation Therapy in LTC

Emergency Management of Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs)

Treatment Options and How They Work

New Oral Anticoagulants in treatment of VTE, PE DR.AMR HANAFY (LECTURER OF CARDIOLOGY ) ASWAN UNIVERSITY

Canadian Society of Internal Medicine Annual Meeting 2016 Montreal, QC

Updates in Coagulation Thrombophilia testing and direct oral anticoagulants. Kevin Y. Chen, MD Hematology and Medical Oncology October 13, 2017

Challenges in Coagulation

ADMINISTRATIVE CLINICAL Page 1 of 6

Drug Use Criteria: Direct Oral Anticoagulants

KCS Congress: Impact through collaboration

Guidance for management of bleeding in patients taking the new oral anticoagulant drugs: rivaroxaban, dabigatran or apixaban

Utilizing Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation Related Stroke Prevention

Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants in the patient with GI bleeding. Marc Carrier

Everything Your Pharmacist Wished You Knew About Anticoagulant Reversal Darrel W. Hughes, Pharm.D., BCPS University Health System & UT Health Science

A Brief History of the World of Anticoagulation

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

Latest News and Clinical Applications of NOACs: What about Antidotes?

New and old anticoagulants. Anticoagulation Focus on Direct Oral Anticoagulants

to a DOAC anticoagulants (DOACs) dosing of DOACs for various indications switching from a DOAC and switching

ADC Slides for Presentation 02/10/2017

The Age of the Novel Anticoagulants. Peter Netzler, MD April 21, 2017 Carolina Cardiology Electrophysiology

Antiplatelets and Anticoagulants. Helen Leung, PharmD PGY1 Pharmacy Resident Memorial Hermann-Texas Medical Center

Joshua D. Lenchus, DO, RPh, FACP, SFHM Associate Professor of Medicine and Anesthesiology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Update overview 2018 of reports on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and the antidote idarucizumab

New Age Anticoagulants: Bleeding Considerations

Policy Evaluation: Removal of Prior Authorization on Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants (NOACS)

A Cascade of Updates: Hot Topics in Anticoagulation

Warfarin for Long-Term Anticoagulation. Disadvantages of Warfarin. Narrow Therapeutic Window. Warfarin vs. NOACs. Challenges Monitoring Warfarin

Nanik Hatsakorzian Pharm.D/MPH

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

ESC Heart & Brain Workshop

Stroke Prevention and Contemporary Management of Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

Anticoagulation Beyond Coumadin

TSHP 2014 Annual Seminar 1

Old and New Anticoagulants For Stroke Prevention Benefits and Risks

Preventing Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: USING THE EVIDENCE

Novel Anticoagulant Drugs. by: Dr. M. Kamandi Fellowship of hematology and Oncology

Abbreviated Class Update: Anticoagulants, oral and parenteral

Transcription:

Anticoagulation Task Force Newest Recommendations Donald Zabriskie, BPharm, MBA, RPh Pharmacy Patient Care Services Cleveland Clinic- Fairview Hospital

THE DRUGS

THE PERFECT ANTICOAGULANT Oral administration Once daily dosing to increase adherence Rapid anticoagulant effect Predictable dose-response relationship No drug interactions No requirement for laboratory monitoring No increased bleeding Rapid-acting antidote

THE HISTORY The first oral anticoagulant Karl Paul Link and Wilhelm Schoeffel Dicoumarol discovery and introduction to therapy- 1940 to 1941 Warfarin introduced as rat poison in 1948 The 1951 suicide attempt leading to The launch of Coumadin in 1954 as an oral anticoagulant

THE PERFECT ANTICOAGULANT? Oral administration Once daily dosing to increase adherence Rapid anticoagulant effect Predictable dose-response relationship No drug interactions No requirement for laboratory monitoring No increased bleeding Rapid-acting antidote

WARFARIN S PLACE Valvular atrial fibrillation Chronic oral anticoagulation with warfarin for patients at high risk for stroke (CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc of 2 or greater) and acceptably low risk for hemorrhagic complications Mechanical prosthetic cardiac valves Warfarin and low-dose aspirin in patients who have received an aortic mechanical prosthetic valve (with or without risk factors) or any mitral mechanical prosthetic valve Variable INR targets depending on valve position and/or risk factors Source: 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

THE HISTORY The second oral anticoagulant Ximelagatran (Exanta ), a direct thrombin inhibitor Rapid oral absorption with peak at 2 to 3 hours after administration Poor bioavailability and major dependence on renal excretion Predictable pharmacokinetics No CYP-based interactions Fixed dosing and no monitoring Approved in 12 countries and then

THE HISTORY The third oral anticoagulant Dabigatran (Pradaxa ), a direct thrombin inhibitor Approved October 19, 2010 for prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation February 2011- American College of Cardiology adds dabigatran to the guidelines for management of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with a class I recommendation

THE HISTORY The fourth oral anticoagulant Rivaroxaban (Xarelto ), a Factor Xa inhibitor Discovered through high-output screening of approximately 200,000 compounds Approved by the FDA on July 1, 2011 for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis Approved by the FDA on November 4 th of the same year for stroke prevention in people with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

THE PERFECT ANTICOAGULANT? Oral administration Once daily dosing to increase adherence Rapid anticoagulant effect Predictable dose-response relationship No drug interactions No requirement for laboratory monitoring No increased bleeding Rapid-acting antidote

ORAL ANTICOAGULATION Vitamin K antagonists Warfarin sodium (Coumadin ) Direct thrombin inhibitors Dabigatran (Pradaxa ) Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors Apixaban (Eliquis ) Edoxaban (Savaysa ) Rivaroxaban (Xarelto )

DIRECT ANTICOAGULATION Right to the action site NOAC (New oral anticoagulants) NOAC (Novel oral anticoagulants) DOAC (Direct acting oral anticoagulants) TSOAC (Target Specific Oral Anticoagulants) Apixaban (Eliquis ) Dabigatran (Pradaxa ) Edoxaban (Savaysa ) Rivaroxaban (Xarelto )

DOACs- HOW THEY DO THAT Direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g., dabigatran) Drug molecule occupies site on thrombin preventing formation of fibrin Direct Factor Xa inhibitors (e.g., rivaroxaban) Bind directly and reversibly to Factor Xa via the S1 and S4 pockets Inhibits both free and clot-bound Factor Xa to interrupt the clotting cycle

DOAC COMPARISON Pharmacokinetics DRUG PEAK HALF-LIFE METABOLISM CYP EFFECT Apixaban 1 to 3 hours 9 to 14 hours Dabigatran 1.5 to 3 hours 12 to 17 hours Edoxaban 1 to 2 hours 10 to 14 hours Rivaroxaban 2 to 4 hours 5 to 9 hours Hepatic 15% Hepatic - Hepatic 3% Hepatic 30%

DOAC COMPARISON Application Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation DRUG DOSING DOSE ADJUSTMENTS Apixaban 5 mg twice a day 2.5 mg twice a day (SCr 1.5 mg/dl or greater AND ) Dabigatran 150 mg twice a day 75 mg twice a day (CrCl 15-30 ml/min) Edoxaban 60 mg once daily 30 mg once a day (CrCl 15-30 ml/min) Rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily 15 mg once a day (CrCl 15-0 ml/min)

DOAC PIPELINE Betrixaban Oral, once daily direct Factor Xa inhibitor Hepatic elimination that may address issues other DOACs have with renal impairment Manufacturer granted Fast Track designation for agent for extended duration prevention of venous thromboembolism in acute medically ill patients EXPLORE-Xa study Evaluation of the safety and tolerability compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

DOAC- WHAT S GOOD? Kinetics and dynamics Rapid onset and stop of activity Fewer dietary and drug interactions compared to warfarin Fixed dosing due to wide therapeutic window No need for routine laboratory monitoring Patient factors Patient satisfaction and better convenience Improved safety profile

DOAC- WHAT S GOOD? Efficacy Compared with warfarin, DOACs are associated with significantly fewer strokes and systemic embolism events Lower event rate of stroke/systemic embolism by 19%, driven mainly by 51% fewer hemorrhagic strokes DOACs and warfarin were similarly effective in preventing ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction

DOACs- WHAT S NOT SO GOOD? Kinetics and dynamics Requirement for dose adjustment for renal function Short half lives means strict compliance, i.e., no missed doses Monitoring One size fits all? Limited reversal agent availability Limited approved indications No approved use with valves, acute coronary syndrome, etc.

DOACs- GOOD OR BAD? Cost effectiveness Eliminate warfarin s repeated laboratory tests, frequent office or clinic visits, cost of adverse events, etc. DRUG DOSING 30 DAY ESTIMATED COST Apixaban 5 mg twice a day $400 Dabigatran 150 mg twice a day $400 Edoxaban 60 mg once daily $350 Rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily $400 Warfarin 5 mg once daily $20 *Pricing data is a representative average wholesale price from a single manufacturer of the brand and/or generic product, respectively

THE BLEEDING RISK

DOACs- THE BLEEDING RISKS A class effect? Lower major bleeding rates than warfarin except for gastrointestinal bleeding risk where lower rates of bledding seen with warfarin DRUG STUDY MAJOR BLEEDING RISK Dabigatran RE-LY 3.11% Dabigatran RELY-ABLE 3.74% Rivaroxaban ROCKET 3.6% Apixaban ARISTOTLE 2.13% Edoxaban ENGAGE-AF TIMI 48 2.75%

DOACs- THE BLEEDING RISKS A class effect? Pooled analysis of all DOACs for all indications together demonstrate no significant difference between DOACs and comparators for risk of major bleeding No significant difference found between DOACs Bleeding risk varies with indications Reduced risk compared to warfarin Reduced risk of fatal intracranial bleeding with DOACs No difference in fatal major bleeding in all other sites

DOACs- THE BLEEDING RISK DOACs (compared to warfarin) Lower rate of hemorrhagic stroke Higher rate of gastrointestinal bleeding Increasing the risk RISK FACTORS FOR MAJOR BLEEDING Older age Mild anemia History of smoking Prior use of aspirin Renal insufficiency History of prior gastrointestinal bleeding Baseline diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or greater History of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

THE RESCUE

DOACs- REVERSAL Up to late 2015 Warfarin reversal with phytonadione, Kcentra (prothrombin complex concentrate) Dabigatran reversal with FEIBA (anti-inhibitor coagulant complex)- off-label Rivaroxaban reversal with Kcentra (prothrombin complex concentrate)- off-label Late 2015 Dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab (Praxbind )

IDARUCIZUMAB (Praxbind ) A humanized monoclonal antibody fragment that binds specifically to dabigatran and its acylglucuronide metabolites The affinity of dabigatran/idarucizumab is approximately 350 times greater than that of dabigatran/thrombin Neutralization of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran within minutes (approximately 15 minutes in animal models)

IDARUCIZUMAB (Praxbind ) Kinetics Drug levels drop in biphasic manner Initial half-life of approximately 45 minutes Plasma concentration after 4 hours of 4% of peak Effect sustained for 12 hours Renal elimination

IDARUCIZUMAB (Praxbind ) Side effects Mild such as headache, delirium, hypokalemia, hypersensitivity Post-marketing/case reports- intracardiac thrombus, NSTEMI, acute ischemic stroke, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary edema, pulmonary embolism

IDARUCIZUMAB (Praxbind ) Administration Single total dose of 5 g intravenously over 15 minutes or less (fastest, practical time) Redosing for re-elevated coagulation parameters such as elevated aptt or clinically relevant bleeding Restricted use? Reversal of dabigatran-induced coagulopathy in patients with intracranial hemorrhage Adult patients

IDARUCIZUMAB (Praxbind ) Cost considerations Current average wholesale cost for a single 5 g dose is approximately $2100 per event Alternatives such as FEIBA or Kcentra costs in excess of $5,000 to $10,000 per event And again Due to its mechanism of action, reversal of dabigatran only

MARKET AND PRACTICE FORCES Usage patterns of DOACs and need for reversal agents Rivaroxaban (Xarelto ) is the market leader followed by Dabigatran (Pradaxa ) followed by Apixaban (Eliquis ) but Need for required reversal? Reversal of the direct Factor Xa inhibitors still unavailable

ANDEXANET ALFA A recombinant protein A modified form of factor Xa that is catalytically inactive but retains high-affinity binding to factor Xa inhibitors ANNEXA-A/ ANNEXA-R trials showed reversal effects for both apixaban and rivaroxaban ANNEXA-E trial to determine efficacy with edoxaban reversal Apixaban- anti-factor Xa activity reduced by 94% Rivaroxaban- anti-factor Xa activity reduced by 92%

ANDEXANET ALFA Kinetics Normalization of coagulation parameters within 2 minutes after completion of IV bolus Effects lasts 2 hours with IV bolus Administration Appears to be an IV bolus dosing followed by infusion over 45 to 60 minutes Regulatory FDA has accepted agent for priority review with action expected by mid-august 2016

A UNIVERSAL REMEDY? Aripazine (also known as ciraparantag) Small, synthetic, water-soluble, cationic molecule Binds to unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparins, fondaparinux, dabigatran and factor Xa inhibitors through hydrogen bonding and charge charge interactions Issues Studies only with edoxaban Limited human studies but results promising

A UNIVERSAL REMEDY? Aripazine Baseline hemostasis restored within 10 to 30 minutes after varying bolus doses of aripazine Effect sustained for 24 hours Additional Phase 2 studies are ongoing

THE PERFECT ANTICOAGULANT? Oral administration Once daily dosing to increase adherence Rapid anticoagulant effect Predictable dose-response relationship No drug interactions No requirement for laboratory monitoring No increased bleeding Rapid-acting antidote

WHICH BRINGS US TO For valvular atrial fibrillation, warfarin remains the mainstay therapy For atrial fibrillation not due to a valvular problem, DOACs represent a safe alternative to warfarin where there is a concern over intracranial bleeding

WHICH BRINGS US TO Selection of a specific DOAC will depend on three factors none of which have to do with efficacy or safety Reversal of oral anticoagulants remains the same with a single exception for a third tier agent

WHICH BRINGS US TO The fact that we still do not have the perfect oral anticoagulant But slowly but surely we may be getting as close as we ever will in the next 5 to 10 years