Management of High-Risk CAD : Surgeons Perspective

Similar documents
Can Angiographic Complete Revascularization Improve Outcomes for Patients with Decreased LV Function? NO!

CABG alone. It s enough? / Μόνο η αορτοστεφανιαία παράκαμψη είναι αρκετή;

Rational use of imaging for viability evaluation

The SYNTAX-LE MANS Study

COMMENT DEFINIR UN PLURITRONCULAIRE. Didier Carrié CHU Toulouse Rangueil

Revascularization for Patients with HFrEF: CABG and PCI and the Concept of Myocardial Viability

Coronary interventions

PCI vs. CABG From BARI to Syntax, Is The Game Over?

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

Revascularization in Severe LV Dysfunction: The Role of Inducible Ischemia and Viability Testing

Michael Mack, M.D. Baylor Healthcare System Heart Hospital Baylor Plano Dallas, TX

High Risk PCI for Heart Failure

Unprotected Left Main Stenting: Patient Selection and Recent Experience. Alaide Chieffo. S. Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

Medical Rx vs PCI vs CABG

Ventricular tachycardia and ischemia. Martin Jan Schalij Department of Cardiology Leiden University Medical Center

The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study

Declaration of conflict of interest NONE

Unprotected LM intervention

Coronary Revascularization in Patients witj Severe LV Dysfunction.: Is the concept of viability still viable?

Coronary Revascularization for Severe LV Dysfunction Is s. Is the concept of viability testing still viable?

Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Severe LV Dysfunction

Benefit of Performing PCI Based on FFR

Cardiac Viability Testing A Clinical Perspective Annual Cardiac Imaging Symposium. Lisa M Mielniczuk MD FRCPC University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Evolving Revascularization Strategies

PTCA 1979: : I

Diabetic Patients: Current Evidence of Revascularization

VCU Pauley Heart Center: A 2009 US News Top 50 Heart and Heart Surgery Hospital

Revascularization In HFrEF: Are We Close To The Truth. Ali Almasood

Surgery Grand Rounds

Left Main Intervention: Where are we in 2015?

Reconciling the Results of the Randomized Trials

Myocardial viability testing. What we knew and what is new

Implications of the New ESC/EACTS Guidelines for Myocardial Revascularization in 2011

CABG for ischemic cardiomyopathy, post myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

When should we indisputably perform CABG? Quand faut-il indiscutablement opérer? Dr Hakim BENAMER

Fractional Flow Reserve: Basics, FAME 1, FAME 2. William F. Fearon, MD Associate Professor Stanford University Medical Center

Michael Mack, M.D. Baylor Healthcare System Heart Hospital Baylor Plano Dallas, TX

Controversies in Cardiac Surgery

J. Schwitter, MD, FESC Section of Cardiology

Imaging and heart failure

Evaluation of Myocardial Viability: What Have We Learned from STICH? Professor of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. Heart Failure (HF)

Left Main Disease: what is left to surgery? Prof. Jacques Monségu CardioVascular Institute Grenoble, France

Left Main Intervention: Will it become standard of care?

Corrective Surgery in Severe Heart Failure. Jon Enlow, D.O., FACS Cardiothoracic Surgeon Riverside Methodist Hospital, Ohiohealth Columbus, Ohio

Surgical vs. Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome

Treatment Options for Angina

PCI for Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis. Jean Fajadet Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France

Cardiogenic Shock. Carlos Cafri,, MD

Perioperative Cardiology Consultations for Noncardiac Surgery Ischemic Heart Disease

Insights into Viability- Function and Contractile Reserve

Pearls & Pitfalls in nuclear cardiology

On-Pump vs. Off-Pump CABG: The Controversy Continues. Miguel Sousa Uva Immediate Past President European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery

Patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction

Stable Angina: Indication for revascularization and best medical therapy

New Insight about FFR and IVUS MLA

Who is the high risk patient?

Paris, August 28 th Gian Paolo Ussia on behalf of the CoreValve Italian Registry Investigators

FFR and CABG Emanuele Barbato, MD, PhD, FESC Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Belgium

Advances in Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. No disclosure or conflicts. Outline

Emergency surgery in acute coronary syndrome

Management of stable CAD FFR guided therapy: the new gold standard

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Assessing Myocardium at Risk: Applying SYNTAX

Sung A Chang Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center

What the Cardiologist needs to know from Medical Images

Left Main and Bifurcation Summit I. Lessons from European LM Studies

Fractional Flow Reserve: Review of the latest data

Mise à Jour sur le traitement du Pluritronculaire Philippe Généreux, MD

Southern Thoracic Surgical Association CABG in 2012: Implications of the New ESC/EACTS Guidelines

Heart Transplantation is Dead

Rationale for Prophylactic Support During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The Role of Nuclear Imaging in Heart Failure

Why do patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and a substantial amount of viable myocardium not always recover in function after revascularization?

1. LV function and remodeling. 2. Contribution of myocardial ischemia due to CAD, and

Surgical Management of Heart Failure. Walid Abukhudair MD, FRCSc Head of Cardiac Surgery Department KFAFH Jeddah

Assessment Of Myocardial Viability

RADIATION HEART DISEASE: MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES

Trial. International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches

Δημήτριος Αγγοσράς, FETCS

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

high SYNTAX Score? I Sheiban Division of Cardiology Interventional Card. University of Turin Turin / Italy

Valve Disease in Patients With Heart Failure TAVI or Surgery? Miguel Sousa Uva Hospital Cruz Vermelha Lisbon, Portugal

Rationale for Percutaneous Revascularization ESC 2011

Management of cardiovascular disease - coronary interventions -

Chronic Total Occlusion: a case for coronary artery bypass grafting

Chronic Total Occlusions. Stephen Cook, MD Medical Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Oregon Heart & Vascular Institute

PCI for Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: What Happened in the Last Week?

Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. Vinay Madan MD February 10, 2018

Steven F Bolling Professor of Cardiac Surgery University of Michigan

Diagnostic, Technical and Medical

Cardiac evaluation for the noncardiac. Nathaen Weitzel MD University of Colorado Denver Dept of Anesthesiology

What do the guidelines say?

Ray Matthews MD Professor of Clinical Medicine Chief of Cardiology University of Southern California

Important LM bifurcation studies update

Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease : CABG. Zürich, F. Siclari MD

Abbott Vascular. PROTOCOL EXCEL Clinical Trial

Coronary Artery Disease in the 21 st Century: An Integrated Approach Based on Science and Art

Current Indications for Cardiac MRI: What You See is What You Get?

Better CABGs vs Better PCI Devices

Transcription:

Management of High-Risk CAD : Surgeons Perspective Steven F. Bolling, M.D. Professor of Cardiac Surgery University of Michigan Conflict : Cardiac Surgeon!

High Risk CABG 77 year old with prior large anterior MI, dilated LV with EF 20%, mild MR, and recurrent heart failure symptoms. Cath shows 3 vessel CAD. Echo shows normal thickness throughout with akinesis of anterior wall. OMT. PCI. Surgery

High Risk CABG Patients are older and sicker More advanced coronary disease Progression of comorbidities More extensive atherosclerosis Operations are more complex Difficult targets Prior stenting REDO - Sternal reentry Limited conduits

Surgeons Perspective : All CABG are High Risk Now! Steven F. Bolling, M.D. Professor of Cardiac Surgery University of Michigan

Risk / Benefit assessment Viability: Significant burden of ischemia? Technical: Suitable targets to viable myocardium?

Risk assessment EuroScore forget it! STS Score Mortality / QOL

Viability assessment Surface echo Contracting, full thickness Thallium delayed resting imaging Mimics potassium in Na/K pump FDG PET scanning Mimics glucose Most sensitive Cardiac gated MR Dobutamine viability study Least sensitive, most specific

Technical assessment Good Targets Use LIMA Cardioplegia Off vs On Pump? Total Revasc IABP Go fast!

High risk CABG When is a low EF too low? Are all EF s created equal? Why do some patients benefit more than others and.can we tell who may benefit more?

Comparison of LVEF Before and After CABG

Clinical and Scintigraphic Characteristics

LVEF with Dobutamine Infusion

Survival p CABG with Low LVEF

Survival p CABG with Low LVEF

CASS Study Source: CASS Registry

RVEF & Survival p CABG with Low LVEF

Is it EF in High risk CABG? 118 pts w/ EF mean 29% Dobutamine echo preop 20 pts had no postop improvement in EF despite good viability 13/20 had large anterior MI Arend F. L. Schinkel,, Don Poldermans, Vittoria Rizzello,, Jean-Louis J. Vanoverschelde, Abdou Elhendy,, Eric Boersma, Jos R.T.C. Roelandt,, and Jeroen J. Bax.. Why do patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and a substantial amount of viable myocardium not always recover in function after revascularization? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004 127: 385-390. 390.

LV Volume.not LVEF! Hammermeister et.al. Circulation 1979 Of 733 pts w/ CAD, most powerful predictor of mortality was ESV and EDV

Post-MI LV Remodeling White, Circulation 1987

LVESI & High Risk CABG Yamaguchi et. al. Left ventricular volume predicts postoperative e course in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Ann Thoracic Surg. 1998;65:434-8. 8.

STICH Trial 1000 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy with EF<35% Dominant anterior wall dysfunction amenable to Dor procedure Multicenter randomized trial to CABG vs. CABG/Dor

Dor Procedure

STITCH Trial Reduction in ESV by 19% (CAB/Dor) vs. 6% (CAB) Similar improvement in NYHA and CCS class

STICH No difference in all-cause mortality or cardiac hospitalization

STICH Revascularization Hypothesis 1212 Randomized MED only 602 610 Randomized CABG 99 clinical sites in 22 countries Enrollment: July 2002 May 2007

Selected Baseline Characteristics Variable MED (N=602) CABG (N=610) Age, median (IQR), yrs 59 (53, 67) 60 (54, 68) Female, % 12 12 Diabetes, % 40 39 Prior Myocardial infarction, % 78 76 Prior Heart Failure within 3 months, % 95 94 Prior PCI or CABG, % 15 16 LVEF (%) median 28 27 Multi-vessel disease (>50%), % 91 91 Proximal LAD stenosis (>75%), % 69 67

All-Cause Mortality as Randomized HR 0.86 (0.72, 1.04) P = 0.123 Adjusted HR 0.82 (0.68, 0.99) Adjusted P = 0.039 0.46 0.41

CV Mortality As Randomized HR 0.81 (0.66, 1.00) P = 0.050 Adjusted HR 0.77 (0.62, 0.94) Adjusted P = 0.012 0.39 0.32

Death or CV Hosp As Randomized 0.68 0.58 HR 0.74 (0.64, 0.85) P < 0.001 Adjusted HR 0.70 (0.61, 0.81) P < 0.001

All Mortality as Treated + Viability!! HR 0.70 (0.58 0.84) P < 0.001 0.49 0.38

PCI or CABG : SYNTAX All-cause Death/CVA/MI to 3 Years in 3VD Subset CABG (n=549) TAXUS (n=546) Cumulative Event Rate (%) 40 20 0 Before 1 year * 6.6% vs 8.0% P=0.39 P=0.04 1-2 years * 1.8% vs 3.7% P=0.07 2-3 years * 2.5% vs 4.4% P=0.10 14.8% 10.6% 0 12 24 36 Months Since Allocation Kappetein AP. N Eur Assoc Cardiothorac Surg. 2010.

SYNTAX Trial LM Study MACCE 3 Year Follow-Up SYNTAX Score PCI CABG Low 18.0 23.0 Intermediate 23.4 23.4 High 37.3 21.2 (Mortality) (13.4) (7.6) MACCE is defined as: All cause death Cerebrovascular accident (CVA/stroke) Documented myocardial infarction (ARC definition) Any repeat revascularization (PCI and/or CABG) Serruys P et al. TCT 2010.

High Risk CAD CABG preferred: More extensive disease More severe LV dysfunction Insulin-dependent diabetes Chronic total occlusion

High Risk CABG Factors to Consider Comorbid conditions LV & RV function Viability + Technical Points Team and Center Aspects

High Risk CABG JUST DO IT!!