Bad Bearings: THE DEVOLUTION OF HIP REPLACEMENT IN AMERICA

Similar documents
Stephen S. Tower, M.D.

Case report: Pain L THR [ post THR 2 years; with history of trivial fall] Your Diagnosis?

Hip and Knee Orthopedic Surgical Implants Market Growth, Research & Trend to Radiant Insights, Inc

WHAT IS THE BEST BONE FIXATION TYPE? 2/11/2011

Hip and Knee Orthopedic Surgical Implants: Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts, Worldwide,

Soft Tissue Imaging in. Total Hip Arthroplasty

FDA Safety Communication: Metal-on- Metal Hip Implants

Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 103: 54 59, 2013

Bone Bangalore

KIP A. PETROFF Board Certified Personal Injury and Civil Trial Lawyer Texas Board of Legal Specialization

Disclosure. Direct Anterior THA via Extension Table. History 11/3/2015

Adverse Local Tissue Reaction in Total Hip Replacement

Hip and Knee Orthopedic Surgical Robots: Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts, Worldwide,

CASE 56 Hip Pain. ? Diagnosis

TITLE: Metal on Metal Total Hip Replacements or Hip Resurfacing for Adults: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness

Exeter. Technical Guide

Hvilken evidens har vi? - hvad praktiserer vi?

Supplementary Appendix

Metal ion levels in patients with a lumbar metal-on-metal Total Disc Replacement:

Arthroprosthetic Cobaltism: Identification Of The At-Risk Patient

Metal-on-metal articulations generate approximately to particles PSEUDOTUMORS FACTORS PATHOGENESIS

Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee Meeting

The Challenge of Durability in Hip Replacement

PERIPROSTHETIC FEMUR FRACTURES AFTER THA: Treatment with Revision

NJR 2009 NJR Activity 2008 Keith Tucker Survivorship Analysis Martyn Porter Outliers Paul Gregg Clinician Feedback Peter Howard

*smith&nephew. BIRMINGHAM HIP Resurfacing (BHR ) System Patient Information Revision 0

1.1 Ceramic on Ceramic Bearings Used with Proximal Modular Stems in THA K. J. Keggi, J. M. Keggi, R. E. Kennon and T. McTighe

Total Elbow Arthroplasty: an Update

Exeter. Designed for Anatomic Restoration. Clinical Evidence Education

Surface Roughness of Femoral Head Prostheses After Dislocation

Histopathological characterization of corrosion product associated adverse local tissue reaction in hip implants: a study of 285 cases

Peachy Mae T. Piana, MD

Informed Consent for HRA

Hip Resurfacing vs. Standard Total Hip Replacement

Hip and Knee Orthopedic Surgical Implants Market Shares, Strategies, and Forecasts, Worldwide, 2016 to 2022

Reaching new heights. Comprehensive. Efficient. Simple.

New data reinforces the proven safety and effectiveness of the BIRMINGHAM HIP Resurfacing System

Case Report Inflammatory Pseudotumor Complicated by Recurrent Dislocations after Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Partial hip resurfacing is considered investigational/not medically necessary for all other indications not listed above.

ReCap Product Rationale

G7 ACETABULAR SYSTEM. beautifully. efficient.

DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH

Protocol. Hip Resurfacing

COI. Consulting-TJO, United Institutional Support- Smith & Nephew, Acelity-KCI, Stryker, USMI

What Are Hip and Knee Replacement Implants Made Of?

BIOTRIBOLOGICAL AND MECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTIY FAILURE: How to break the code

Protocol. Hip Resurfacing

Metal-on-Metal Bearings in Cementless Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

# $ pages In Stock. Report Description

CPCS. Training Manual. Collarless Polished Cemented Stem

Egyptian Community Arthroplasty Register

Instrumentation Options

Stability without compromise. Epsilon Durasul Constrained Insert

A Summary of Knee Recalls Consumers Union Safe Patient Project September 9, 2013

National Joint Replacement Registry. Lay Summary 2015 Annual Report Hip and Knee Replacement

Cement Polished Tapered Stems of 12/14 Taper. 96 mm 98 mm 104 mm 110 mm 116 mm 122 mm 128 mm. Ceramic Femoral Head. Outer Diameter

Pseudo tumor a cystic or solid mass (MRI or ultrasound) 1% of MOM pts develop pseudo tumors by 5 years 17 pts, all female, Pandit et al (JBJS, 2008)

MARATHON Cross-Linked Polyethylene

Orthopedic Surgery (Adult Hip Service) (Seoul National University Hospital)

Zimmer Longevity Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene. Clinical Value Dossier - APAC

Lesson Learned From Retrieval Analysis Of A Dislocating, Large Diameter MoM Revision THA A Case Report

Enhanced Stability Constrained Liners. Design Rationale Surgical Technique

Systematic Review of Clinical Outcome using Titanium Fiber Mesh Porous Ingrowth Surfaces

The information contained in this document is intended for healthcare professionals only.

BRITISH HIP SOCIETY. Annual Scientific Meeting 2019 Nottingham, Concert Hall. Registration from with Refreshments

What is the Best Bearing Type? 1/11/2011

Orthopaedics What s New in 2015 What Really Works in Orthopaedics: Does Advertising Change our Practice

MAY Page 1 of 2

A NEW APPROACH TO BEARING SURFACES FOR TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

Enhancing stability and increasing range of motion. Metasul LDH Large Diameter Head

Totally Hip Preservation to Revision. Gothenburg, Sweden 29 March - 1 April 2017 WEDNESDAY 29 MARCH. Arrivals THURSDAY 30 MARCH

MEDICAL POLICY MEDICAL POLICY DETAILS POLICY STATEMENT. Page: 1 of 7

Ceramic Bearings Should Be Routinely Used in THA. Disclosures 5/4/2015

Informed Consent for HRA

Clinical Study Mean 5-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients under the Age of 30

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

FIXATION FIRST WEAR REDUCTION OXIDATIVE STABILITY MECHANICAL INTEGRITY PROVEN TECHNOLOGY

OUTCOMES AFTER REVISION OF METAL-ON-METAL HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY THOMAS P. GROSS, MD FEI LIU, PHD MIDLANDS ORTHOPAEDICS, P.A.

The Role of Stem Modularity for THA in a Community Based Practice

ESC. Enhanced Stability Liners. Design Rationale & Surgical Technique

AN ANALYSIS FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY FOR ENGLAND AND WALES

Specializing in Mechanical Testing for Medical Devices. Office:

Scan Bi-Polar 22/28. Operative Technique

Hip Resurfacing Corporate Medical Policy

Biomaterials in Total Hip Joint Replacements: The Evolution of Basic Concepts, Trends, and Current Limitations A Review

Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision

Segmental Fracture Of A Cemented Femoral Stem - A Case Report And Review Of Litrature

Presented by : Frank Filice (PT) London Health Sciences Centre

Highlights of Hip and Knee Societies/AAHKS Specialty Day 2012

FINAL PROGRAM SCHEDULE

PyroCarbon Implants Durability + Biocompatibility

Document No Rev. B Pg. 1 of 5 Approvals / Date Title: INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE DJO SURGICAL MODULAR REVISION HIP SYSTEM AND ACETABULAR CAGE

REVISION. Zimmer Biomet All Trabecular Metal Cups vs. All non-tm cementless cups

Impingement in THA. Georgi I. Wassilew. Orthopaedic Department, Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. C.

Session 3: Controversies for Bearing Surfaces in THR

Over 20 Years of Proven Clinical Success. Zimmer Natural-Knee II System

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty after Ceramic Bearing Fractures in Patients Under 60-years Old; Mid-term Results

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY

Orthopedics/Orthopedic Surgery CV #6002

Transcription:

Bad Bearings: THE DEVOLUTION OF HIP REPLACEMENT IN AMERICA 1970-2014 Stephen S. Tower, M.D. Orthopedic Surgeon Affiliated Professor University of Alaska President of the Alaska Arthroplasty Initiative

D I S C L O Industry Legal Work No S U R E S Alaska Arthroplasty Initiative $50,000 Grant Providence Alaska Medical Center

Explant Analysis $1000

Marketing trumps science and value NICE Report Cemented MoP $6000 Cemented CoP $8000 Hybrid MoP $10000 Un-cemented MoP $12000 Un-cemented CoC $16000 MoM Resurfacing $10000 MoM THA $14000 Safety And Value

Hip Replacement Costs USA 12K 120K JAMA 2/2013 Retrospective Study $ 0.01 per implant Implant Registration $50 per implant Explant Analysis 1K Generic Parts 5K Revision surgery 50-100K Efficacy Safety And Value Cost, Un-Proven parts 15K Space Suits and Laminar flow 1K (increase infections 3X) Complexity, and Complications

Mayo Clinic first 2000 Charnley Hips 1969-1971 Dr. Declan Nolan 1970 Failure rate 1% per year patients < 50 0% per year patients > 70 years

Dr. Declan Nolan 2011

Mayo first 2000 CLFA1969-1971 Twenty-five-Year Survivorship of Two Thousand Consecutive Primary Charnley Total Hip Replacements and Bernard F. Morrey, MD The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 84:171-177 (2002) Daniel J. Berry, MD, W. Scott Harmsen, MS, Miguel E. Cabanela, MD

The Holy Grail of Hip Replacement Lasts Forever Instant recovery Pain free Stable No activity limits Not poison the patient

501 K Devices Antecedent Device Pre-Market Approved Devices

5 Year Revision Rates Predicate Charnley THA 1970s 2-3% 510K Metal-on-Metal THA (ASR) 44% (22X) 510K Modular Neck THA MoP or CoP Rejuvenate 44% (22X) PMA Metal-on-Metal Resurfacing Conserve Plus 10% (5X) BHR 4% (2X)

4 million Americans at Risk: Unexpected Failure Mechanisms Periprosthetic Metallosis Hypercobaltemia Pseudotumors Cobaltism from Hip Replacements with Chrome-Cobalt Components

At-risk populations USA Ceramic-on-Metal Wear (1000s) Metal-on-Metal Wear (1,000,000) Taper Corrosion (3,000,000) Metallosis: Pseudotumors Hypercobaltemia: Cobaltism

Ceramic-on-Metal wear (1000s) Systematic Literature Review of 2318 publications we found 9 cases of cobaltism from CoM wear Periprosthetic Metallosis: Extreme Pseudotumors: Asymptomatic in several cases Hypercobaltemia: Extreme 400-1000 ppb Cobaltism: Deafness, Blindness, Dementia, Peripheral Neuropathy, Hypothyroidism, Cardiomyopathy

Metal-on-Metal wear (1,000,000) Systematic Literature Review of 2318 publications we found 25 cases of cobaltism from MoM wear Periprosthetic Metallosis: Moderate Pseudotumors: Common but sometimes asymptomatic Hypercobaltemia: Moderate to Severe 16-398 ppb Cobaltism: Tinnitus, Disordered Mood and Sleep, Cognitive Dysfunction, Anorexia, Patchy Retinopathy, Cardiomyopathy

Taper Corrosion (3,000,000) Recently recognized cause of APRMD and Hypercobaltemia. Most hips done past 20 years at risk. Cobaltism yet to be reported. Periprosthetic Metallosis: Minimal Pseudotumors: Common but sometimes asymptomatic Hypercobaltemia: Minimal to Moderate < 1-20 ppb Cobaltism: Tinnitus, Disordered Mood and Sleep, Cognitive Dysfunction, Anorexia, Diastolic Dysfunction, common (Alaska)

Pseudotumor AKA APRMD Adverse Periprosthetic Reaction to Metallic Debris

Osteolysis, Pseudotumor, Sciatica Minimal Metallosis and Hypercobaltemia (0.9) 56 YO active male 6 years post THA Popular nonrecalled Stryker 32 mm MoP 510K hip No perceived problem with the hip Osteolysis detected with surveillance XR

Monitoring Hip Patients at Risk Blood Cobalt Level (PBB) 0.2 normal, > 1.0 excess exposure (Industry) 1 small ball Metal-on-Metal THA 2-3 large ball Metal-on-Metal HR or THA 2-10 APRMD, subclinical and mild cobaltism 11-100 subclinical, mild, and moderate cobaltism 101-300 moderate to severe cobaltism 301-1000 extreme manifestations, DEATH (1 case) Cobalt debris from corrosion more toxic at the hip and systemically than that from wear?

Cobaltism Awareness - December 2010 The report is unusual because of the rarity of the occurrence of metalinduced systemic complications in patients with total hip replacement and the fact that the author was one of the patients. As millions of patients worldwide have undergone total hip replacement, these cases represent rare events indeed.

Cobaltism Awareness January 2014 JBJS

Alaskan MoM Hip Series 35 revised of < 100 at risk Median [BCo] = 40 PPB 10 with reversible Cobaltism?Mean latency to illness 2 years Mean latency to revision 3 years Population at risk NOT systematically screened

Cobaltism: Severity relates to the degree and duration of cobaltemia literature review, wear cases.

Alaskan Rejuvenate Series Recalled Implant 30 revised of about 70 at risk Median [BCo] = 4 PPB 10 with reversible Cobaltism? Mean latency to illness 2 years Mean latency to revision 3 years Population at risk systematically screened

Alaskan Non-Rejuvenate Series Taper Corrosion Hips 6 revised of about 20,000 at risk Median [BCo] = 4 PPB 5 with reversible Cobaltism? Mean latency to illness 5 years Mean latency to revision 7 years Population at risk NOT systematically screened

Cobaltism Awareness: Systematic Monitoring of Patients with MoM Hips Indicated Young patient, missed 2 annual follow-ups but saw surgeon socially 1-2 times a week [BCo] = 63 ppb Reversible Neurocobaltism with 48 510K Device Not recalled months of surplus morbidity

Cobaltism Awareness: Severe Cobaltism may precede Hip Symptoms 510K Device Not recalled 46 y.o. Pilot F/H PD 2009 Biomet Magnum MoM Hips 42 months max DBS & Drugs Onset of hip pain B[Co] = 116 PPB Hips Revised to Ceramic-on-Plastic 2 months post revision B[Co] = 0.7 12 months post-op off DBS & Drugs 2 years post-op off Drugs, min DBA

Cobaltism Awareness: Systematic Monitoring of Patients at Risk for Taper Corrosion Indicated Rejuvenate Implanted 8/2010 510K RECAL L 20 months later: progressive fatigue, poor sleep, nausea, weight loss from 140 to120 pounds, deafness, myalgia, cognitive decline, arrythmia and diastolic dysfunction B[Co] = 11 PPB RECALLED 7/2012 (at 23 months) Explanted after 33 months

4 Million at Risk?! 56 yo male: 6 and 3 years s/p 32 mm CoCr-on-Plastic non-revujenate Styker Hips Several months left groin pain: [BCo] = 4 PPB Admitted to CCU post screening ECHO for acute asymptomatic proximal aortic dissection Popular 510K Not known to be AT RISK STRYKER ACCOLADE

CoCr-on-Plastic MOST POPULAR HIP USA Past 20 years 510K Device Zimmer MLT Stem 32 mm CoCr Head Longevity Socket Liner 66 year-old med-mal attorney 4 months of left groin pain 8 years post implant [BCo] of 4 PPB

Altered Stem-Head Tapers 510K

Cobaltism may precede Hip Symptoms Alaskan MoM Series

Extreme Hypercobaltemia and Cobaltism Not Rare in Patients Implanted with PMA HIP RESURFACING DEVICES Smith and Nephew BHR PREEMPTION PROTECTION Implanted for 36 Months Blood Cobalt Level 322 PPB Same as NEJM case that needed heart transplant

Patients with modular Chrome-Cobalt Components may require systematic monitoring of cobalt levels! Annual [BCo]: > 1 ppb is significant hypercobaltemia Cross-sectional imaging indicated any at risk patient with hip symptoms and for asymptomatic patients with B[Co] > 2.9 ppb Consider Revision [BCo] > 10 pbb Any systemic manifestations c/w cobaltism and B[Co] > 3 ppb Hip symptoms and pseudo-tumor

New Hips: 1980-2010 Evolution More Stable Less Wear (mm) 3 Lasts longer no Saves bone - no Easier Revision-no Marketing or Science? Unexpected Toxicity

Proving Non-inferiority Of New Hips The Holy Hand Prospective 10 year Study of a thousand hips blinded with controls by uninvested Investigators Joint Registries Retrospective Grenade Comprehensive practice review with explant analysis

Tribology & Corrosion Unexpected Long Latency Significant

Summer 2010 Regulatory Response CDC Atlanta Let s Circulate this Nationwide FDA Washington DC No, medical devices our our turf Dr. Tower is not an expert FDA s Criteria for Expertise Industry Consultant or Furthered by Orthopedic Professional Organization

Primary Hips USA 270,000 per year $30,000 Basic $60,000 (Bells Whistles) 10 Billion $ a year 95% 510K unproven implants

Revision Hip Replacement USA 50,000 per year $50-100k each $2.5 Billion yearly

Metal-Metal hip surplus ten year costs: 10.6 Billion Dollars One Million MoM Implanted $5K increased primary implant costs Excess ten year revision rate 10-50% $60K revision cost 10% 5 year revision rate of revisions $1000 + yearly serum monitoring costs

What went Wrong? Conflict of Interest? Premarket Market Regulation Professional spheres Post Market

Cost of Metal-Metal Debacle USA A Billion Dollars per year Design Surgeons of the ASR paid about $20 Million Cost of 510K Debacle USA? Ten Billion Dollars per year

Solutions An NTSB approach to premature total joint failures Regional registries that employ explant analysis to determine the probable cause of failures Identification of Canary in the Cage early sentinel implant failures Non-conflicted analysis of new technologies Regulatory reform mandating use of proven, less expensive implants for most all

Operational Budget $350,000 a year

Hip Replacement Costs USA 12K 120K JAMA 2/2013 Retrospective Study $ 0.01 per implant Implant Registration $50 per implant Efficacy Safety And Value Explant Analysis 1K per Explant Generic Parts 5K Revision surgery 50-100K Un-Proven parts 15K Space Suits 1K (increase infections 3X) Cost, Complexity, and Complications