LONG-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TAMSULOSIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS ASSOCIATED WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Similar documents
Increasing Awareness, Diagnosis, and Treatment of BPH, LUTS, and EP

H6D-MC-LVHR Clinical Study Report Synopsis Page LVHR Synopsis (LY450190)

Diagnostic approach to LUTS in men. Prof Dato Dr. Zulkifli Md Zainuddin Consultant Urologist / Head Of Urology Unit UKM Medical Center

A Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety Between Tamsulosin and Terazosin in the Treatment of Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

The Evolution of Combination Therapy. US men eligible for BPH treatment * with projected population changes

Office Management of Benign Prostatic Enlargement

The Journal of International Medical Research 2012; 40:

α-blocker Monotherapy and α-blocker Plus 5-Alpha-Reductase Inhibitor Combination Treatment in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia; 10 Years Long-Term Results

Voiding Dysfunction. Hyo Serk Lee, Sae Woong Kim 1, Seung-June Oh 2, Myung-Soo Choo 3, Kyu-Sung Lee

Combination Drug Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

During the past decade, numerous

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine (January 2019) Vol. 74 (6), Page

Effects of Low-Dose Tamsulosin on Sexual Function in Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Suggestive of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

International Clinical Development Department, Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 17 1 Hasune 3-chome, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo , Japan

Original Article Japanese Urological Association. International Journal of Urology (2006) 13,

Therapeutic Strategies for Managing BPH Progression

PRABHAKAR SINGH*, MANOJ INDURKAR, AMITA SINGH, PALLAVI INDURKAR

The Journal of International Medical Research 2005; 33:

The treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with alpha blockers in men over the age of 80 years

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: sanofi-aventis. Sponsor/company:

MEDICAL THERAPY. Endocrine Approaches. Página 1 de 5.

ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage:

Key words: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), Prostatic Hyperplasia, Alpha-1 Adrenoceptor Antagonists, Tamsulosin, Terazosin.

a 1 -adrenoceptor antagonist on uro owmetric parameters in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Important Papers / Landmark. Vijayan Manogran

Original Article. Introduction. Methods. Abstract

Chapter 4: Research and Future Directions

The population of subjects which was statistically analyzed was the Intent-to-Treat population

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Jay Lee, MD, FRCSC Clinical Associate Professor University of Calgary

EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF TADALAFIL IN IMPROVING LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC BENIGN PROSTATIC ENLARGEMENT

Mini-Invasive Treatment in Urological Diseases Dott. Alberto Saita Responsabile Endourologia Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano

Original Article - Voiding Dysfunction

MANAGING BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERTROPHY IN PRIMARY CARE DR GEORGE G MATHEW CONSULTANT FAMILY PHYSICIAN FELLOW IN SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH

Role of silodosin in patients with LUTS/BPE non responding to medical treatment with tamsulosin: a prospective, open-label, pilot study

Treatment Patterns in Alpha-Blocker Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Efficacy and safety of tamsulosin OCAS

Hyoung Woo Kim, Dae Geun Moon, Hyun Min Kim, Jong Ho Hwang, Soon Chan Kim, Sam Geuk Nam, Jun Tag Park

DIAGNOSED WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Korean Urologist s View of Practice Patterns in Diagnosis and Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Nationwide Survey

European Urology Supplements 4 (2005) 33 44

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH):

Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH) is the most

Chapter 3: Results of the Treatment Outcomes Analyses

Alpha antagonists from initial concept to routine clinical practice

Guideline for the primary care management of male lower urinary tract symptoms

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION SYMPTOM INDEX, PROSTATE VOLUME, PATIENTS WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Management of LUTS. Simon Woodhams February 2012

Correspondence should be addressed to Yoshinori Tanaka;

New Treatment Modalities for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Seung-June Oh, MD Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital

Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX

Profile of Silodosin. Francesco Montorsi * Article info. Abstract

UV-2005/01. Chronic Prostatitis and Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrom (CP/CPPS) Karl-Bickleder-Str. 44C Straubing - Germany

Is Tamsulosin 0.2 mg Effective and Safe as a First-Line Treatment Compared with Other Alpha Blockers?: A Meta-Analysis and a Moderator Focused Study

Medical Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Present and Future Impact

Abstract. Key words Trial without catheter, Acute urinary retention, Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Introduction

MMM. Topic The use of Tadalafil 5mg daily for the treatment of BPH-LUTS

L ower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are a major health problem and are prevalent in men aged.45 years1 3.

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-525, NCT#

Role of herbal drugs in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Himplasia

BPH: a present and future perspective on health impact

Current drug management of BPH in primary care Claire Taylor MRCS, Charlotte Foley MRCS and Roger Kirby MA, MD, FRCS Urol

Medical therapy options for aging men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: focus on alfuzosin 10 mg once daily

Silodosin versus naftopidil for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A multicenter randomized trial

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Goals of Therapy

Systematic Review of Combination Drug Therapy for Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Victoria Sharp, MD, MBA, FAAFP. Clinical Professor of Urology and Family Medicine

Effects of prostatic inflammation on LUTS and alpha blocker treatment outcomes

The Hallmarks of BPH Progression and Risk Factors

PROSTATIC ARTERY EMBOLISATION (PAE) FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA. A Minimally Invasive Innovative Treatment

Balancing clinical outcomes and quality of life aspects in the treatment of LUTS/BPH van Dijk, M.M.

Will Medical Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Result in Better or Worse Sexual Function in Men?

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 4.

VOIDING DYSFUNCTION IN ELDERLY MALE CURRENT STATUS

Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen as a Predictor of Prostate Volume in the Community: The Krimpen Study

Chapter 3: Results of the Treatment Outcomes Analyses

BPH with persistently elevated PSA 아주대학교김선일

Can men with prostates sized 80 ml or larger be managed conservatively?

The Enlarged Prostate Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment

The Risk of Fracture with Taking Alpha Blockers for Treating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Tzu Chi Medical Journal

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Efficacy of Silodosin for Relieving Benign Prostatic Obstruction: Prospective Pressure Flow Study

Tamsulosin sustained release preparation in patients of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia

Study No. 178-CL-008 Report Final Version, 14 Dec 2006 Reissued Version, 18 Jul 2011 Astellas Pharma Europe B.V. Page 13 of 122

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-518, NCT#

Recommended drug treatment of BPH in primary care Claire Taylor MRCS, Charlotte Foley MRCS and Roger Kirby MA, MD, FRCS Urol

Literature Scan: Drugs for BPH

IJBCP International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Enlarged Prostate Guidelines: How They Can Be Useful to Primary Care

REVIEW The utility of serum prostatic-specific antigen in the management of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Index. urologic.theclinics.com. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

REVIEW The role of combination medical therapy in benign prostatic hyperplasia

Impact of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment with Tamsulosin and Solifenacin Combination Therapy on Erectile Function

Last Review Status/Date: December Summary

regimens. Data may differ from published or presented data and are limited information provided here. The results from a single trial need

Summary ID# Clinical Study Summary: Study B4Z-MC-LYCL

The New England Journal of Medicine

SILOFAST Capsules (Silodosin)

Transcription:

0022-5347/03/1702-0498/0 Vol. 170, 498 502, August 2003 THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY Printed in U.S.A. Copyright 2003 by AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000076140.68657.fd LONG-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TAMSULOSIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS ASSOCIATED WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA PERINCHERY NARAYAN,* CHRISTOPHER P. EVANS AND TIMOTHY MOON* From the North Florida Research Institute, Inc., Gainesville, Florida, Department of Urology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, and Division of Urology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin ABSTRACT Purpose: We evaluated the long-term (up to 6 years) safety and efficacy of the selective 1A-adrenoceptor antagonist tamsulosin in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Materials and Methods: A total of 609 patients were enrolled in a 4-year multicenter open label extension study. Subjects entered the study after completion of a 1-year open label trial that included patients who previously completed up to 57 weeks of double-blind, placebo controlled studies. Maintenance doses (0.4 or 2 0.4 mg daily) established in the 1-year study were continued. Efficacy and safety were assessed every 3 months. Primary efficacy evaluations were changes from baseline maximum urine flow rate and total American Urological Association symptom index, and the responder rates for those 2 end points. Secondary end points were changes in American Urological Association subset scores, Boyarsky symptom scores, average urine flow rate, post-void residual urine volume, quality of life index and investigator global assessment. Results: Of the 609 patients who entered the 4-year extension study 159 had a 2-year or greater prior experience with tamsulosin, yielding a potential 6-year experience on the medication. Of this 159 patient subset 109 completed the whole 6 years. Initial rapid improvements from baseline in primary and secondary end points were maintained each year throughout the duration of the study. Tamsulosin was well tolerated, confirming the safety profile demonstrated in earlier studies. Orthostatic hypotension was observed in 1.3% of the patients. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the sustained efficacy, safety and excellent long-term tolerability of tamsulosin for up to 6 years in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia. KEY WORDS: prostate, prostatic hyperplasia, urination disorders, adrenergic alpha-antagonists Pathological signs of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) occur in 8% of men in the fourth decade of life with the prevalence steadily increasing to greater than 70% of men in the seventh decade of life. 1 As the United States population ages, the number of men with BPH increases, creating a greater demand for effective and safe treatments. Current treatment options include surgical and pharmacological interventions. Tamsulosin, which has been available in the United States since 1997, has proved to be effective for treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to BPH. 2 4 The relative lack of cardiovascular side effects and lack of interactions with antihypertensives associated with tamsulosin therapy is probably due to its subtype selectivity for 1A and 1D-adrenergic receptors. 5, 6 It is the first drug targeted specifically to treat only LUTS associated with BPH. Published pivotal double-blind studies have demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of tamsulosin for up to 1 year. 2 4 An extension study showed similar results for up to 2 years. 7 We describe a long-term 4-year extension study that enabled patients to continue tamsulosin treatment for up to 6 years (fig. 1). Accepted for publication March 21, 2003. * Financial interest and/or other relationship with Boehringer- Ingelheim and Sanofi. Financial interest and/or other relationship with Boehringer- Ingelheim and Astra-Zeneca. 498 MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients. Eligible patients included in this study (527.2) were men 45 years or older who had completed a previous 1-year open label extension trial of tamsulosin (US93-04). 7 This trial recruited patients from 3 shorter double-blind studies, namely US92-03A (17 weeks), 3 US92-03B (40-week extension of US92-03A) 4 and US93-01 (17 weeks). 2 Study US93-04 included patients from active and placebo groups from the previous studies, a number of patients enrolled but not randomized and a few who had had experience with tamsulosin in other trials. 7 Patients agreed to continue established treatment maintenance doses (0.4 or 0.8 mg daily), make required clinic visits 3 months 7 days apart throughout the 4-year extension and provide informed consent. Inclusion/exclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria were biopsy evidence of prostate cancer following a prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurement of greater than 4.0 ng/ml or positive digital rectal examination or evidence of cancer on transrectal ultrasound. Other reasons for exclusion included acute urinary retention (AUR) or urinary tract infection, renal dysfunction, abnormal hemoglobin, leukocytes or liver enzymes, postural symptoms, diastolic blood pressure below 60 mm Hg or tachycardia to greater than 120 beats per minute, poorly controlled diabetes and poor compliance during the previous study. -Adrenergic agents and anticholinergics were prohibited. Efficacy. Primary efficacy evaluations at each visit were changes from baseline in total American Urological Associa-

LONG-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TAMSULOSIN 499 FIG. 1. Tamsulosin long-term study. Asterisk represents double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Of 208 patients 74 were from placebo treated group of US92-03A/B, 104 from placebo treated group of US93-01, 15 from placebo treated group who completed study US92-03A and did not continue to study US92-03B, and 15 who qualified by exceptional enrollment and were on tamsulosin in previous trials. Of 239 patients, 219 on tamsulosin completed study US93-01 and 20 on tamsulsin completed study US92-03A but did not continue to study US92-03B. Total of 162 patients on tamsulosin completed studies US92-03A and US92-03B, and had potential 6-year experience with tamsulosin. tion (AUA) symptom index score (7 questions scored 0 to 5) and maximum urine flow rate (Qmax). Qmax was measured by uroflowmetry and patients voided at least 125 ml. Other primary efficacy evaluations were the percent of total AUA symptom score responders and the percent of total Qmax responders. Secondary efficacy evaluations included changes from baseline in AUA subset scores (obstructive 3 questions, irritative 4 questions, AUA bother score 7 questions, scored 0 to 4), Boyarsky symptom scores (9 urinary symptoms scored 0 to 3), changes from baseline for mean urinary flow rate and investigator global assessment (scored 0 worsened to 4 markedly improved). Other criteria included uroflowmetry, post-void residual urine volume (PVR) and a quality of life (QOL) questionnaire consisting of 5 questions, of which 4 were validated (possible score 13). 8 Safety. Safety assessments at each visit were evaluated for treatment emergent (TE) adverse events (AEs), changes in digital rectal examination and other changes on physical examination (body weight and vital signs). Assessments also included chest x-ray, 12 lead electrocardiogram and clinical laboratory tests (blood chemistry, PSA, hematology and urinalysis). Clinically significant orthostatic hypotension was defined by a decrease in systolic blood pressure of 20 mm Hg or greater, or symptoms with a change in posture. AEs occurring between dose 1 and 28 days after the last dose were classified as TEAEs and categorized by us as probably, possibly or remotely related, or unrelated to the study drug. Serious AEs were classified as any fatal or immediately life threatening clinical experience, permanently or severely disabling event, or event requiring or prolonging hospitalization. The safety population received at least 1 dose of tamsulosin. Safety data were recorded throughout the 4-year extension. The intent to treat (ITT) population received at least 1 dose with efficacy data collected after visit 1. Baseline values were established during the visit prior to the initial tamsulosin dose in patient respective earlier studies. RESULTS A total of 609 patients entered the 4-year extension trial, of whom 5 were excluded due to an incomplete post-baseline safety assessment, so that 604 patients comprised the safety population. Of the 609 men 159 entered with 2 or more years of experience with tamsulosin (potential 6 years of treatment) and of these 609 men 109 completed 6 years. Mean patient age and weight were 58.9 years and 192.7 pounds, respectively. Of the men 94.9% were white, 4.5% were black and 0.7% were Asian or other. The patient age range was 45 to 79 years and 269 men (44.5%) were 55 to 64 years old. Efficacy analysis. Changes from baseline to the first evaluable assessment after each treatment year were analyzed in the 600 men in the ITT population. Significant improvement from baseline was observed after the completion of each year of exposure for as long as 6 years for change from baseline in total AUA symptom score and change from baseline in Qmax (fig. 2). Mean total AUA symptom score improvement from baseline for the 6 years was 8.1 to 10.9 (p 0.05). Figure 3 shows mean improvements from baseline in the 159 patients who had the potential to receive 6 years of tamsulosin experience. The percent of patients experiencing a 25% or greater decrease in total AUA symptom score from baseline was consistent for the 6 years (71.6% to 80.7%). Mean improvement in Qmax from baseline was 1.01 to 2.29 ml per second (p 0.05). A 30% or greater change was noted in 40% of patients during year 1. Similar percents were sustained for up to 6 years (26.9% to 40.0%). Secondary efficacy evaluations showed statistically significant improvement from baseline during each year of tamsulosin administration (p 0.05, table 1). The investigator global assessment tabulation demonstrated that 85.2% to 96.3% of the patients maintained or increased the improvement shown in previous tamsulosin trials. QOL improvement was also sustained throughout the 6 years. Improvements in PVR relative to baseline (88.0 ml) were between 17.8 and 3.2 ml for all years of tamsulosin administration. Except for years 4 and 6 these changes were statistically significant (p 0.05). Safety analysis. During the 4-year extension infection in 45.5% of cases, accidental injury in 29.8%, rhinitis in 25.7%, pain in 24.8% and pharyngitis in 23.8% were the most frequently observed TEAEs, of which each was reported at least once. Drug related (defined as probably, possibly or remotely

500 LONG-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TAMSULOSIN FIG. 2. Mean total AUA symptom score and peak urine flow rate change from baseline in ITT population. Mean AUA symptom score baseline was 17.4. Mean baseline Qmax was 10.1 ml per second. At 1 to 6 years AUA score change from baseline SD was 6.9, 6.9, 7.3, 7.3, 7.4 and 6.8. At 1 to 6 years Qmax change from baseline SD was 4.07, 3.96, 4.01, 4.13, 4.38 and 4.50 ml per second, respectively. *, statistically significant vs baseline (95% CI p 0.05). FIG. 3. Total AUA score mean change with tamsulosin from baseline in patients with at least 2 years of dosing, that is with potential to receive 6 years of tamsulosin, at start of trial 527.2. Mean baseline score at year 0 was 19.8. At 1 to 6 years AUA score change from baseline SD was 7.32, 6.90, 7.19, 7.11, 7.22 and 6.74, respectively. related) TEAEs decreased during the 6 years. During the whole study 95 patients (15.7%) discontinued tamsulosin due to TEAEs, which was less than the 18.7% who discontinued for other reasons, including protocol violations, nonstudy drug related reasons, poor compliance and personal reasons. Only 5 patients (0.8%) discontinued due to abnormal ejaculation and only 3 discontinued due to dizziness, postural hypotension and syncope (0.2%, 0.2% and 0.2%, respectively). Of the patients 29 (4.8%) experienced a serious AE considered related to tamsulosin treatment, including skin or prostate cancer, syncope, myocardial infarction and chest pain. During the study course there were 9 deaths. Only 1 death (due to heart arrest) was considered remotely related to drug therapy. Four of the 8 episodes of syncope were considered related to treatment. Table 2 lists TEAEs reported by 10% or greater of the patients. Only 30 patients (5%) had clinically significant PSA elevations from 4.0 or less to greater than 4.0 or greater than 4.0 to greater than 6.0 ng/ml throughout the whole 6-year experience. Of 122 patients 21 had clinically elevated PSA during the 4-year extension, of whom 11 discontinued treatment because PSA increased to 10 ng/ml or greater. Of the 604 patients 12 had prostate cancer during the 4-year extension. A total of 11 patients (1.8%) had AUR during the 6-year experience. No new cases developed during years 5 and 6. Only 1 patient withdrew from the study because of AUR. Eight patients (1.3%) experienced clinically significant orthostatic hypotension. DISCUSSION To our knowledge this study represents the longest clinical trial experience of -blocker therapy in patients with LUTS associated with BPH. Tamsulosin provided sustained relief of symptoms and urine flow for up to 6 years with high levels of safety and tolerability, and no decrease in the drug effect. This study corroborates and extends previous results regarding tamsulosin administration. 2 4 Significantly no new safety issues arose during the 4-year extension that had not been apparent in previous clinical trials. Consistent with previous tamsulosin studies, 2 4 discontinuation rates due to adverse events were low throughout the 6-year experience with the incidence of drug related TEAEs steadily decreasing. The discontinuation rate in this study due to TEAEs was 15.7%, which compares favorably with rates in other BPH drug trials.

LONG-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TAMSULOSIN 501 TABLE 1. Changes from baseline in secondary efficacy parameters, QOL and PVR in 6 years in the ITT population Tamsulosin Experience, Yrs Baseline 1 2 3 4 5 6* Secondary efficacy parameters (vs baseline 95% CI p 0.05) No. pts 600 600 573 516 461 418 109 AUA subsets: Mean irritative SE (range 0 15) Mean obstructive SE (range 0 20) % Nocturia more than 1/night (No.) Mean AUA bother score SE (range 0 28) 7.3 0.12 2.9 0.12 3.1 0.13 2.9 0.14 2.9 0.14 3.1 0.15 4.3 0.27 10.1 0.18 5.2 0.19 5.4 0.19 5.3 0.21 5.2 0.23 5.5 0.25 6.6 0.47 67.8 (599) 44.7 (599) 41.2 (572) 45.2 (515) 48.2 (460) 45.9 (417) 48.6 13.6 0.24 6.8 0.24 7.3 0.25 7.0 0.28 7.0 0.29 7.2 0.32 9.4 0.60 Boyarsky score: (462) (417) Mean total symptom SE 9.7 0.15 4.5 0.16 4.7 0.17 4.6 0.18 4.6 0.20 4.6 0.21 5.8 0.41 (range 0 27) Mean irritative SE 4.2 0.07 1.2 0.07 1.3 0.07 1.2 0.08 1.2 0.08 1.2 0.09 1.6 0.17 (range 0 12) Mean obstructive SE 5.6 0.12 3.3 0.12 3.4 0.13 3.4 0.13 3.5 0.15 3.5 0.16 4.2 0.34 (range 0 15) % Nocturia more than 60.3 38.8 36.8 (570) 42.1 (508) 42.4 (458) 41.2 (414) 45.0 (108) 1/night (No.) Mean urinary flow SE (ml/sec) 5.3 0.07 1.2 0.09 1.0 0.09 1.1 0.10 0.9 0.10 0.9 0.12 0.7 0.25 QOL (vs baseline Wilcoxon signed rank test p 0.001) No. pts 597 (incomplete baseline evaluation in 3) 597 570 514 460 417 108 Mean QOL score (median) 4.5 0.11 (4.0) 1.9 0.10 ( 2.0) 1.9 0.11 ( 2.0) 1.8 0.12 ( 1.0) 1.8 0.13 ( 1.5) 1.9 0.14 ( 2.0) 2.3 0.31 ( 2.0) PVR (vs baseline 95% CI p 0.05 except yrs 4 & 6) No. pts 600 600 564 496 451 406 101 Mean ml PVR SE 88.4 3.12 17.8 3.65 ( 25.0 10.6) 13.4 4.20 ( 21.6 5.2) 11.1 4.66 ( 20.2 2.0) 3.2 5.60 ( 14.2 7.8) 14.6 5.14 ( 24.7 4.6) 10.2 8.58 ( 27.0 6.6) (95% CI) * Potential 6-year experience at study entry in 159 patients.

502 LONG-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TAMSULOSIN TABLE 2. New treatment emergent AEs reported by 10% or less of patients during 4-year extension AE No. Pts (%) Whole body: Infection 275 (45.5) Accidental injury 180 (29.8) Pain 150 (24.8) Headache 111 (18.4) Influenza syndrome 107 (17.7) Back pain 97 (16.1) Digestive system (dyspepsia) 74 (12.3) Musculoskeletal system (arthralgia) 80 (13.2) Nervous system (dizziness) 61 (10.1) Respiratory system: Rhinitis 155 (25.7) Pharyngitis 144 (23.8) Sinusitis 73 (12.1) Increased cough 66 (10.9) Urogenital system (prostatic disorder)* 68 (11.3) Safety population 604 patients. * Comprises various signs and symptoms of the prostate. When finasteride was compared with placebo in a 4-year study, 9 discontinuation rates due to TEAEs were high in each arms (34% and 42%, respectively). 8 In a 4-year doxazosin 10 study and a 42-month terazosin 11 study the therapeutic effect of each drug was maintained with time but dizziness led to discontinuation in 3.3% and 6.7% of patients, respectively. In addition, a significantly greater percent of patients who were treated vs those who received placebo (3.9 vs 0%) reported hypotension as an adverse reaction. 10 In contrast, in our study dizziness, postural hypotension and syncope led to discontinuation in only 0.2% of patients each. These low discontinuation rates may reflect tamsulosin selectivity for the 1A-receptor subtype. Abnormal ejaculation led to only 5 discontinuations (0.8% of patients), suggesting that patients did not perceive it to be as important as other events that led to discontinuation. 12 The low incidence of AUR in patients treated with tamsulosin for up to 6 years suggests that this agent may decrease the risk of AUR. The reported increase in PSA in the current study is consistent with observations in other long-term studies of patients with BPH. For example, in a placebo controlled finasteride trial elevated PSA occurred in 34% of the patients on placebo. 13 The low incidence of prostate cancer in our study, comparable to that in a placebo group of a similar population, 13 was achieved, although the tamsulosin population included some patients with high PSA who were at greater risk. Tamsulosin does not affect the risk of prostate carcinoma or detecting prostate cancer using PSA measurements. 14 CONCLUSIONS Tamsulosin has been shown to provide sustained significant relief of BPH symptoms for up to 6 years without a decrease in the drug effect. No new safety issues were reported during the 4-year extension study that had not been observed in previously published studies of shorter duration. The rate of discontinuation due to AEs was lower than in similar trials. The long-term safety and efficacy profiles of tamsulosin in patients with LUTS associated with BPH, corroborating and expanding results from previous short term clinical trials, support its usefulness as first line long-term therapy for LUTS associated with BPH. REFERENCES 1. Berry, S. J., Coffey, D. S., Walsh, P. C. and Ewing, L. L.: The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol, 132: 474, 1984 2. Narayan, P., Tewari, A. and Members of the United States 93-01 Study Group: A second phase III multicenter placebo controlled study of 2 dosages of modified release tamsulosin in patients with symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol, 160: 1701, 1998 3. Lepor, H.: Phase III multicenter placebo-controlled study of tamsulosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Tamsulosin Investigator Group. Urology, 51: 892, 1998 4. Lepor, H.: Long-term evaluation of tamsulosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia: placebo-controlled, double-blind extension of phase III trial. Tamsulosin Investigator Group. Urology, 51: 901, 1998 5. Chapple, C. R., Wyndaele, J. J., Nordling, J., Boeminghaus, F., Ypma, A. F. and Abrams, P.: Tamsulosin, the first prostateselective alpha1a-adrenoceptor antagonist. A meta-analysis of two randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre studies in patients with benign prostatic obstruction (symptomatic BPH). European Tamsulosin Study Group. Eur Urol, 29: 155, 1996 6. Lowe, F. C.: Coadministration of tamsulosin and three antihypertensive agents in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: pharmacodynamic effect. Clin Ther, 19: 730, 1997 7. Narayan, P. and Lepor, H.: Long-term, open-label, phase III multicenter study of tamsulosin in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology, 57: 466, 2001 8. Barry, M. J., Fowler, F. J., Jr., O Leary, M. P., Bruskewitz, R. C., Holtgrewe, H. L. and Mebust, W. K.: Measuring diseasespecific health status in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Measurement Committee of The American Urological Association. Med Care, suppl., 33: AS145, 1995 9. McConnell, J. D., Bruskewitz, R., Walsh, P., Andriole, G., Lieber, M., Holtgrewe, H. L. et al: The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finasteride Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Study Group. N Engl J Med, 338: 557, 1998 10. Lepor, H., Kaplan, S. A., Klimberg, I., Mobley, D. F., Fawzy, A., Gaffney, M. et al: Doxazosin for benign prostatic hyperplasia: long-term efficacy and safety in hypertensive and normotensive patients. J Urol, 157: 525, 1997 11. Lepor, H.: Long-term efficacy and safety of terazosin in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Terazosin Research Group. Urology, 45: 406, 1995 12. Hofner, K., Claes, H., De Reijke, T. M., Folkestad, B. and Speakman, M. J.: Tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily: effect on sexual function in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol, 36: 335, 1999 13. Andriole, G. L., Guess, H. A., Epstein, J. I., Wise, H., Kadmon, D., Crawford, E. D. et al: Treatment with finasteride preserves usefulness of prostate-specific antigen in the detection of prostate cancer: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled clinical trial. Pless Study Group. Proscar Long- Term Efficacy and Safety Study. Urology, 52: 195, 1998 14. Evans, C., Doyle, C. A. and Ranhosky, A.: PSA levels and occurrence of prostate cancer during long-term study (6 years) of treatment with tamsulosin for BPH. J Urol, suppl., 165: 382, abstract 1564, 2001