Workplace Noise Surveys: A Hands-On Measurement Workshop

Similar documents
Workplace Noise Surveys: A Hands-On Measurement Workshop

noise induced Working Together to Prevent Hearing Loss

3M Center for Hearing Conservation

Environmental Health & Safety Policy Manual

East Carolina University

Villanova University Department of Environmental Health and Safety Policy and Procedure Manual

HEARING CONSERVATION PROCEDURE

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program Regulations and Recommendations Summary

Hearing Conservation Program

11. Hearing Conservation Program Chapter , WAC

UCSD HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Environment, Health & Safety (EH&S) and Center for Occupational & Environmental Medicine (COEM) 2017

This program is designed to prevent hearing loss for students, staff and employees while engaged in universitysponsored

SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY S WRITTEN HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM December 2017

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program April 27, 2018

Environmental Health and Safety. Hearing Conservation Program

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation Program. Guideline for Noise Exposure

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

UC Merced Hearing Conservation Program

Procedure. Procedure

Environmental Health and Safety. Hearing Conservation Program

Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program. Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing

Hearing Conservation Training Program

Procedure Number 310 TVA Safety Procedure Page 1 of 6 Hearing Conservation Revision 0 January 6, 2003

BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE OCCUPATIONAL NOISE

Health, Safety, Security and Environment

NC Employees Workplace Program Requirements for Safety and Health. Hearing Conservation

Hearing Conservation Plan

HEARING CONSERVATION PURPOSE

Hearing Conservation Plan

Vision Painting Inc. Safety Management System

CCS Administrative Procedure H Hearing Conservation

Town of Brunswick. Hearing Conservation Plan

Hearing Conservation Program Table of Contents

Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program

Emerging Best Practices. Christine B. Petitti Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management OSHA

Hearing Conservation Program

Craven Community College HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Page104. Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation

North Dakota State University Noise/Hearing Conservation

NOISE & HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM YALE UNIVERSITY

Hearing Conservation Program Administration

Before taking field measurements, it is important to determine the type of information required. The person making the measurement must understand:

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM (HCP)

Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program

Effective Date: 27-February Table of Contents

Hearing Conservation Program

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM


Hearing Conservation Program

NOISE CONTROL AND HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Wood Buffalo - EHS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

SUNY Cortland Environmental Health and Safety Office Hearing Conservation Program

Establishing an Effective Hearing Conservation Program. Sarah E. Mouser, AuD, CCC-A Doctor of Audiology & Customer Relations Facilitator

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

The University of Texas at El Paso

HEARING LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM AND PROCEDURES

Rutgers Environmental Health and Safety (REHS)

Please refer to the body corporate s registered bylaws in relation to domestic noise.

Hearing ConservationTraining

Hearing Conservation Terminology Courtesy of Workplace Integra, Inc.

Prepared By: Blake Smith/James Stubbs

Environmental Health & Safety Programs

Santa Clarita Community College District HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. Revised

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Texas Christian University

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM REVISED AS OF 12 JULY 2010

Hearing Conservation Program. Santa Clara University 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Safety Services Guidance. Hearing protection

Hearing Conservation. Wear a Protective Hearing Device NOW... or Wear a Hearing Aid LATER. Workers Health & Safety. Provided by

Hearing Conservation Program. Southwestern Community College. Office of Human Resources

Delaware State University

Occupational Noise Exposure 29 CFR

Model Safety Program

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Appendix 1: Hearing Conservation Programme for Managing Noise Risks 30. Appendix 2: Noise Hazard Identification Checklist 31

Contents. 1) Purpose ) Policy ) Definitions ) Procedure a) Requirements b) Noise standard... 4

ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation Program

Noise at work risk assessment

Occupational Noise. Contents. OHSS: Guidance Occupational Noise

Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program. Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing

NOISE SURVEY REPORT EXAMPLE COMPANY PROCESSING PLANT

Hearing Loss Prevention PM Session Ted Madison

Hearing Conservation Program Evaluation Checklist

Noise Monitoring. T. Renée Anthony, PhD, CIH, CSP University of Iowa, College of Public Health

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

POLICY TRAINING HEARING PROTECTION. Noise Exposure

UC Santa Barbara Hearing Conservation Program Manual

NOISE EXPOSURE AT WORKPLACE DEPARTMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH MALAYSIA

INDH 5131 Controls of Occupational Hazards. Noise & Hearing Conservation. Part II. V. Audiometric Testing

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY ENERGY SUPPLY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Occupational Noise Exposure

Occupational Noise & Hearing Loss Presented at CopperPoint SafetyWorks 2016 By Ms. Robyn Steiner, MSPH CIH CSP June 8 and 15, 2016

Rev. B: 10/2015. Hearing Conservation Program (HCP) Colby College 5500 Mayflower Hill Waterville ME Page 1 of 8

Transcription:

Workplace Noise Surveys: A Hands-On Measurement Workshop Presented by: Kevin Schouppe, B.Sc. (Kin.) Principal/Ergonomics Consultant OSHTECH Ergonomics Group Inc. Associate Faculty Member, Conestoga College kschouppe@oshtechinc.com www.oshtechinc.com

Workplace Noise Surveys: Hands-On Workshop Introduction & Session Description: This hands-on workshop will be of particular interest to anyone considering conducting their own workplace noise surveys, or, simply looking to gain a better understanding of the instruments and types of measures. Participants will be introduced to the basic operating procedures of common instruments and get an opportunity to use the meters to acquire spot-check and/or short-term dosimetry measures on a variety of noise sources or events. The results will be generally discussed in the context of compliance requirements, including evaluation and selection of appropriate hearing protection and common elements of a hearing conservation program. A little background information...

Workplace Noise Surveys: Hands-On Workshop Training Topics & Objectives: Brief Introduction 1. Introduction to workplace noise. 2. Ensure awareness of the compliance requirements. Noise Survey Workshop 3. Identify & explain basic terms used in workplace noise surveys. 4. Identify & describe noise measurement instruments. 5. Hands-on. Practical noise measurement workshop. Hearing Conservation Programs (HCP) 6. Common elements of a hearing conservation program. Question or technical term e.g. sound pressure level (SPL) or noise level? An answer, explanation or practical tip e.g. understand the compliance requirements

Introduction: Sound Pressure or Noise Level Unbearable Single exposure may cause deafness Deafening Extreme discomfort Painful Pain threshold for most people Very high Prolonged exposure may damage hearing Moderate e.g. quiet office db Very low scarcely audible

Introduction: Health & Safety Effects of Noise Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) Tinnitus

Compliance: OH&S Act, Regulations & WS&I Act Awareness of compliance requirements: A noise survey...is it a compliance requirement? Yes or no but support your answer.

H&S Law: Noise Regulations & OH&S Act Compliance requirements overview: Noise exposure limits Emphasis on engineering controls Feasibility investigation of engineering controls for noise sources >85 db(a) Hearing Protection Devices (HPDs) Warning signs Hearing Conservation Program Can you think of other possibly applicable provisions? Practical tip...know the compliance requirements. Communicate, train, enforce.

Compliance: Noise Regulations Noise exposure limits : (3) Every employer shall take all measures reasonably necessary in the circumstances to protect workers from exposure to hazardous sound levels. (6) Without limiting the generality of subsections (3) and (4), every employer shall ensure that no worker is exposed to a sound level greater than an equivalent sound exposure level of 85 db(a), L ex,8. "Equivalent" Noise Time (decibels) (hours) 85 8 88 4 91 2 94 1 97 0.5 100 0.25 L ex,8 equivalent of an 8-hour TWA noise exposure no > 85 decibels.

Compliance: Noise Regulations Emphasis on engineering controls : (4) The protective measures shall include the provision and use of engineering controls, work practices and, subject to subsection (7), personal protective equipment. (5) Any measurement of sound levels in the workplace that is done in order to determine what protective measures are appropriate shall be done without regard to any use of personal protective equipment. Can you distinguish between engineering controls and work practices?...

Compliance: Noise Regulations Feasibility of engineering controls or PPE as a last resort: (7) Except in the circumstances set out in subsections (8) and (9), the employer shall protect workers from exposure to a sound level greater than the limit described in subsection (6) without requiring them to use and wear personal protective equipment.

Compliance: Noise Regulations Feasibility investigation of engineering controls: (9) Subsection (8) (re PPE) applies if engineering controls are required by subsections (3) and (4) and, (a) (b) (c) (d) are not in existence or are not obtainable; are not reasonable or not practical to adopt, install or provide because of the duration or frequency of the exposures or because of the nature of the process, operation or work; are rendered ineffective because of a temporary breakdown of such controls; or are ineffective to prevent, control or limit exposure because of an emergency. Feasible??? Based on effectiveness, cost, technical feasibility or implications for equipment use, service & maintenance. To be able to demonstrate compliance... document feasibility investigation outcomes.

Compliance: Noise Regulations PPE: Hearing Protection Devices (HPDs) when: (8) If this subsection applies, workers shall wear and use personal protective equipment appropriate in the circumstances to protect them from exposure to a sound level greater than the limit described in subsection (6). i.e. 85 db(a), L ex,8 Identiifcation &/or Description of Workplace Job/Task/Equipment-Specific Noise Entry Noise Source Level 7 # db(a) Assembly Operator L ex,8 84.5 Machine Shop Operator Lex,8 81.0 Welding Operator Lex,8 87.8 Test Operator Lex,8 83.2 Receiving Operator Lex,8 82.9 Cut-off Saw Operator Lex,8 81.6 Paint Operator Lex,8 81.8 Shipping Operator Lex,8 87.9 Assembly Operator Lex,8 84.7 Machine Shop Operator Lex,8 80.7

Compliance: Noise Regulations Warning Signs: (10) A clearly visible warning sign shall be posted at every approach to an area in the workplace where the sound level, measured as described in subsection (5), regularly exceeds 85 db(a).

WS&I Act: NIHL Claims & Audiograms

Workplace Noise Survey: Measurement Basics Types of Workplace Surveys: Screening Survey Compliance Survey Engineering Survey Types of Common Instruments: Sound Level Meter (SLM) Noise Dosimeter Octave Band Analyzer Refer to workshop materials...

Workplace Noise Survey: Point-in-Time Results Table 1. Point-in-Time Noise Measurement Results Entry # Measurement Description db(a) 1.0 Receiving, area near shipping crates, employee at nearby work bench 66-68 2.0 Receiving, operator zone while using hoist to unpack crates 72-74 3.0 Near in-plant office mid-way along north wall, area measurement 70-75 4.0 Paint booth area measurement with exhaust fan on, no employee activity 78-80 5.0 Shipping, operator zone near saw, saw "on" but idle 84-86 6.0 Shipping, operator zone near saw, saw "on" cutting 2"x 4" 92-94 7.0 Shipping, operator zone while demsonstrating use of air nailer 94-98 8.0 Assembly, cenntral area measurement, background level while generally quiet 75-78 9.0 Assembly, nearby workbench where air release occurring 80-85 10.0 Assembly, operator zone while using pneumatic pencil grinder 88-92 11.0 Test, operator zone while using pneumatic impact wrench 95-100 12.0 Assembly, vacant workbench in central area, generally quiet 70-77 13.0 Assembly, operator zone while using pneumatic impact wrench 95-100 14.0 Cutoff saw, operator zone while belt sander "on" but idling 86-89 15.0 Cutoff saw, operator zone while belt sander "on" and sanding steel bar 91-94 16.0 Machine shop, operator zone while radial drill working 78-80 17.0 Machine shop, operator zone during set-up of boring mill 73-75 18.0 Welding, operator zone at work table, exhaust fan "on" but no operator activity 80-82 19.0 Area measure in southwest corner of plant, quiet area 65-67 20.0 Area measure in mid plant near cabinets along lunch room wall 65-67 21.0 Machine shop, mid-plant near boring mill while operational 78-83 22.0 Machine shop, operator zone while using pneumatic sander 85-90 23.0 Machine shop, operator zone while using compressed air to blow off part 85-90 24.0 Machine shop, operator zone while using 18V cordless drill 78-80 25.0 Machine shop, near radio "on" 80-82 26.0 Cut off saw, operator zone at (Empire) sand blaster while holding parts during sand blasting 92-95 27.0 Paint, operator zone while compressed air paint spray wand in use 80-82 Any comments about these spot-check results? Compliance conclusions? Create a plant map. A picture is worth 1,000 words!

Workplace Noise Survey: Summary of Dosimetry Results Noise Level (db(a)) 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 84.3 84.5 80.7 81.0 87.6 87.8 Figure 1. Noise Dosimetry Summary Workplace Noise Levels db(a) L eq & L ex,8 82.9 83.2 82.6 82.9 81.4 81.6 81.5 81.8 87.7 87.9 84.5 84.7 80.5 80.7 143 144 147 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 Leq Lex,8 MoL Criterion 85 db(a) NIOSH Recommended PPE Limit 80 db(a) Dosimeter Number Any questions or comments about these dosimetry results? Review details...the time & noise level of each dosimetry record.

Workplace Noise Survey: Dosimetry Results Shipper Dosimeter (Dosimeter 153, Mth Day Year) L eq = 87.67 db(a) 120 110 100 L ex,8 = 87.94 db(a) MOL Criteria 85 db(a) 90 Noise Level (db(a)) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 7:54 AM 8:24 AM 8:54 AM 9:24 AM 9:54 AM 10:24 AM 10:54 AM 11:24 AM 11:54 AM 12:24 PM 12:54 PM 1:24 PM 1:54 PM NIOSH Recommended PPE Limit 80 db(a) 2:24 PM Time of Shift Any comments or observations about this job-specific dosimetry record? Identify the specific sources of noise levels greater than 85 decibels.

Hearing Conservation Programs Common Elements of a Workplace HCP Routine measures/surveys of employee exposures In concert with Feasibility investigations of engineering controls Hearing protection devices Noise hazard warning signs Audiometric testing Engineering & administration controls Employee communications and training Documentation & program evaluation To ensure compliance with the new H&S requirements! To reduce potential for NIHL & WSIB claims! Consult : MOL & WSIB guidelines, CSA standards, etc.

HCP: Engineering Controls &/or HPD s Controlling/Reducing Noise Exposure: At source Acoustic-engineering Encapsulation Hearing protector Collective protection Personal protection Aim to control noise at source e.g. buy quiet programs

HCP: Feasibility Investigation of Engineering Controls Feasibility Investigation: An example Wet Polishers and Grinders A number of Make/Model wet polishers and Make/Model dry cut grinders are used in finishing. The most significant noise source is probably the air exhaust, which could be reduced by adding a muffler, as in Case History 46 at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/pdfs/79-117-k.pdf This may be reasonable and practical if commercially available. Additional recommendations are as follows: 1. Noise reduction might also be achieved by substituting quieter tools, if available and affordable. 2. Set up and maintain a formal, documented preventive maintenance program for the grinders and polishers. 3. Consult equipment manufacturers and inquire about quieter tools and/or exhaust mufflers. 4. Document records of these activities, whether feasible or not. Completed at level of knowledge typically possessed by the workplace parties.

HCP: Hearing Protection Devices Hearing Protection Devices (HPD s) and Protection Outcome: Earplugs or earmuffs or dual protection? Advisable for exposures to sound levels above 80 decibels db(a) Only used as a last resort to control noise exposure HPD ratings: CSA class, NRR, SNR, fit testing Less protective than ratings (selection, fit, deterioration, discomfort, user motivation) HCP must include training on proper selection, use & care of HPD s Protection outcome: calculating effective noise level ENL?: CSA protection outcomes Ensure HPD ratings used properly. ENL 4 PROTECTION OUTCOME 5 : BASIC MEANING < 70 Overprotection 70-75 Acceptable 75-80 Optimal or ideal 80-85 Acceptable > 85 Insufficient.

HCP: Selection & Evaluation of HPD Workplace Noise Levels Identiifcation &/or Description of Workplace Job/Task/Equipment-Specific Noise Entry Noise Source Level 7 # db(a) Assembly Operator L ex,8 84.5 Machine Shop Operator Lex,8 81.0 Welding Operator Lex,8 87.8 Test Operator Lex,8 83.2 Receiving Operator Lex,8 82.9 Cut-off Saw Operator Lex,8 81.6 Paint Operator Lex,8 81.8 Shipping Operator Lex,8 87.9 Assembly Operator Lex,8 84.7 Machine Shop Operator Lex,8 80.7 Applicable Guidelines Noise Level & Recommended CSA Class db(a) Plug Muff Dual NRR <85 - - - - 85-90 C - - <17 90-95 B - - 17 to 24 95-105 A - - >24 105-110 A A or B Yes - 110 A A or B Yes+ - HPD Available in Workplace 3M E-Z Fit 3M E-A-Rsoft Yellow Neons CSA Type: Foam CSA Type: Foam Class: NRR SNR Class: NRR SNR A(L) 28 A(L) 33 or

Workplace Noise Surveys: Hands-on Workshop Introduction & Session Description: This hands-on workshop will be of particular interest to anyone considering conducting their own workplace noise surveys, or, simply looking to gain a better understanding of the instruments and types of measures. Participants will be introduced to the basic operating procedures of common instruments and get an opportunity to use the meters to acquire spot-check and/or shortterm dosimetry measures on a variety of noise sources or events. The results will be generally discussed in the context of compliance requirements, including evaluation and selection of appropriate hearing protection and common elements of a hearing conservation program. A little moving forward information... Thank you On behalf of: Q & A Kevin Schouppe, B.Sc. (Kin.) Principal/Ergonomics Consultant OSHTECH Ergonomics Group Inc. Associate Faculty Member, Conestoga College kschouppe@oshtechinc.com Tel: (519) 883-4727 www.oshtechinc.com