Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research, March 2015: Vol.-4, Issue- 2, P

Similar documents
Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; June 2014: Vol.-3, Issue- 3, P

Dual Force Cuspid Retractor

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

A SIMPLE METHOD FOR CORRECTION OF BUCCAL CROSSBITE OF MAXILLARY SECOND MOLAR

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

MOLAR DISTALIZATION WITH MODIFIED GRAZ IMPLANT SUPPORTED PENDULUM SPRINGS. A CASE REPORT.

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

The 20/20 Molar Tube. Ronald M. Roncone, D.D.S., M.S.

The management of impacted

Anchorage system. tomas / Sets Page 270 tomas / Pins Page 271 Instruments and accessories Page 273 Patient consultation material Page 282

Enhanced Control in the Transverse Dimension using the Unitek MIA Quad Helix System by Dr. Sven G. Wiezorek

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

The Inman Aligner. The Inman Aligner,* a versatile removable

rocky mountain orthodontics functionaleducation

Ectopic upper canine associated to ectopic lower second bicuspid. Case report

6. Timing for orthodontic force

Comparison of Two methods of Transpalatal Arch and Lingual Arch Activation

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

Holy Nexus of Variable Wire Cross-section: New Vistas in Begg s Technique

Case Report Unilateral Molar Distalization: A Nonextraction Therapy

The Tip-Edge appliance and

Expansion/Arch Development

Case Report n 2. Patient. Age: ANB 8 OJ 4.5 OB 5.5

ORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS

TransForce 2. Arch Developer Appliances Clinical Cases. New Horizons In Orthodontics

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

The main challenge in using the natural dentition

INCLUDES: OVERVIEW ON CLINICAL SITUATIONS FREQUENTLY ENCOUNTERED IN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENTS MECHANOTHERAPY USED TO RESOLVE THESE SITUATIONS

Canine Extrusion Technique with SmartClip Self-Ligating Brackets

A Novel Method of Altering the Buccal Segment Relationship

Orthodontic treatment for jaw defor. Sakamoto, T; Sakamoto, S; Harazaki, Author(s) Yamaguchi, H. Journal Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College, 4

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

CLASS II CORRECTION SIMPLIFIED

Orthodontic Treatment Using The Dental VTO And MBT System

clinical orthodontics article

A randomized clinical trial to compare the Goshgarian and Nance palatal arch

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

Significant improvement with limited orthodontics anterior crossbite in an adult patient

From Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment

A Method for Stabilizing a Lingual Fixed Retainer in Place Prior to Bonding

Class I. Clear Fixed Appliance vs. Aligner Treatment for Arch Development. Clinician: Dr. Stuart Frost, Phoenix, AZ Patient: A.M.

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

Intraoral molar-distalization appliances that

Hyrax, quadhelix, headgear,pendulum, Delaire facemask

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

TURN CLASS II INTO SIMPLE CLASS I PATIENTS.

Angle Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary dental protrusion and missing mandibular first molars*

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Treatment of a Rare Bilateral Severe Ectopic Eruption of the Maxillary First Permanent Molar: A Case Report

Correction of a maxillary canine-first premolar transposition using mini-implant anchorage

Interdisciplinary management of Impacted teeth in an adult with Orthodontics & Free Gingival graft : A Case Report

TURN CLASS II INTO SIMPLE CLASS I PATIENTS.

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

Anterior Open Bite Correction with Invisalign Anterior Extrusion and Posterior Intrusion.

TADs Supported Tongue Crib: A New Minimalistic Design

Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.

Archwires & Accessories

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Integrative Orthodontics with the Ribbon Arch By Larry W. White, D.D.S., M.S.D.

Orthodontics (Ort) #910 Orthodontic Technique Lab Course Director: Dr. Brian Preston Instructor: Brian D. Willison CDT

Checklist with summary points

Segmental Orthodontics for the Correction of Cross Bites

THE JASPER JUMPER APPLIANCE; USAGE, EFFECTS AND RECENT MODIFICATIONS

INDICATIONS. Fixed Appliances are indicated when precise tooth movements are required

Treatment planning of nonskeletal problems. in preadolescent children

Lingual correction of a complex Class III malocclusion: Esthetic treatment without sacrificing quality results.

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Unilateral Horizontally Impacted Maxillary Canine and First Premolar Treated with a Double Archwire Technique

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

Dr Robert Drummond. BChD, DipOdont Ortho, MChD(Ortho), FDC(SA) Ortho. Canad Inn Polo Park Winnipeg 2015

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

04 Inserting the HYCON TUBE

TWO PHASE FOR A BETTER FACE!! TWIN BLOCK AND HEADGEAR FOLLOWED BY FIXED THERAPY FOR CLASS II CORRECTION

Assessment of Archwidth Changes in Extraction and Non Extraction Patients. College of dental sciences, demotand, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand

Low-Force Mechanics Nonextraction. Estimated treatment time months (Actual 15 mos 1 week). Low-force mechanics.

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

MOLAR DISTALIZATION WITH CUSTOM MADE BILATERAL PALATAL DISTALIZER

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

RETENTION AND RELAPSE

REPRINTED FROM JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ORTHODONTICS 1828 PEARL STREET, BOULDER, COLORADO Dr. Nanda Dr. Marzban Dr. Kuhlberg

Flip-Lock HERBST Appliance COMFORT. CUSTOMIZATION. ADVANCED ENGINEERING.

Mandibular Protraction Appliance IV

Use of Cantilever Mechanics for Impacted Teeth: Case Series

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

Modified Intraoral Repositioning Appliance in Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Honing Damon System Mechanics for the Ultimate in Efficiency and Excellence Jeff Kozlowski, DDS East Lyme, CT

Extract or expand? Over the last 100 years, the

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD

The following standards and procedures apply to the provision of orthodontic services for children in the Medicaid/NJ FamilyCare (NJFC) programs.

New Class of Appliance

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

Non-osseointegrated. What type of mini-implants? 3/27/2008. Require a tight fit to be effective Stability depends on the quality and.

Transcription:

Case report: Intra-arch non-compliant mechanics for maxillary 2 nd molar buccal crossbite: A transpalatal arch with L-Loop 1Dr.Renuka Patel, 2 Dr.Falguni Mehta, 3 Dr.Shivam Mehta, 4 Dr.Swati Khonde 1Assistant professor, Department of orthodontics,govt.dental college and hospital,ahmedabad, India 2 Head and professor, Department of orthodontics,govt.dental college and hospital,ahmedabad, India 3P.G. part-3, Department of orthodontics,govt.dental college and hospital,ahmedabad, India 4P.G. part-2, Department of orthodontics,govt.dental college and hospital,ahmedabad, India Corresponding author: Dr. Renuka Patel Abstract: For over a decade, various modified appliances have been described which are placed intraorally to make a treatment successful independent of patient compliance. Many cases are seen with 2 nd molar buccal crossbite in routine clinical practice, adding significantly to treatment time. Different methods have been suggested to correct it, but a better method would be to correct it without extrusion. So in the present article we have modified the transpalatal arch in a way that its middle loop is directed distally with two additional L-loops directed mesially, E-chain is connected to 2 nd molar to correct it during any phase of orthodontic treatment when mandibular arch is well-aligned. Key Words: Cross bite,transpalatal arch with L-Loop,E-chain Introduction: The Transpalatal Arch introduced by Goshgarian, soldered or removable have become a routine part of orthodontics for the purpose of anchorage..transpalatal arch can be used as an adjunct during orthodontic treatment to control the movement of maxillary 1 st molars in three dimensions including molar rotation,uprighting and maintaining transverse dimension posteriorly. Transpalatal arch has been modified for different purposes e.g.for space maintainance,intrusion etc.. Here we made transpalatal arch with bilateral symmetrically positioned L-Loop for correcting transverse discrepancy of maxillary 2 nd molar. Medworld asia Dedicated for quality research www.medworldasia.com 497

Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research, March 2015: Vol.-4, Issue- 2, P. 497-501 Fig.1:Intra-oral view with assembly Fig.2: Maxillary 2 molar Buccal crossbite of 4mm 498 498 www.ijbamr.com P ISSN: 2250-284X, E ISSN : 2250-2858

Fabrication procedure: An impression is taken with prewelded molar bands on maxillary 1 st molar and study cast is made. In the patient shown here there is a buccal crossbite of maxillary 2 nd molar about 4mm on left side(fig.2 ). A modified TPA is made from 1.0mm hard stainless steel round wire with middle omega shaped loop directed distally and two additional L- loops directed mesially (8mm long and 8mm wide). They are symmetrically positioned on either side of the middle loop at the bisecting point of mesial surface of maxillary lateral incisor and of 1 st molar adapted along the palatal curvature about 2mm away from the palatal tissue.it is then soldered on the palatal aspect of the 1 st molar band. This assembly is cemented on the maxillary 1 st molars. Buccal tube is bonded on maxillary 2 nd molar buccally.additional L-loop is used for engaging an E-chain.An open long clear E-chain(Rabbit force,libral traders)which exerts about 128gms(4.5 oz)of force is inserted from the buccal tube of maxillary 2 nd molar crosses over the occlusal surface to L-loop on left side(fig.1 ).E-chain has to be changed every 3weeks.Buccal displacement of maxillary 2 nd molar gets aligned with in 3months(Fig.4 ) 0.017 0.025 HANT is extended to 2 nd molar to maintain the correction. Light force of 1oz(28.56gms) with prestretched E-chain is maintained for next 3months to prevent relapse(fig.3 ). Fig.3: After 3months Maxillary 2 molar in occlusion 499

Fig.4: Maxillary 2 molar in archform Discussion: This modification of TPA allows it to be used in more cases while saving on treatment time.and by incorporating L-loop we have virtually eliminated unwanted extrusion,which frequently occurs in inter- arch correction with S elastics.but in this intra-arch mechanics,e-chain crosses over the occlusal surface of maxillary 2 nd molar along with low placed L-loop delivers intrusive force on maxillary 2 nd molar.however, it helps to deliver an isolated force on buccally displaced maxillary 2 nd molar without disturbing anchor unit and simultaneous desired movement of the dentition.and also this mechanics does not interfere with the physiologic eruption of teeth in the counterpart. A modified Transpalatal arch with L-loop is simple in design,easy to fabricate,not soldered, has minimal chances of breakage,prevents slippage of E-chain,is non-compliant and without disturbing anchor unit and simultaneous desired movement of the dentition.and also this mechanics does not interfere with the physiologic eruption of teeth in the counterpart. A modified Transpalatal arch with L-loop is simple in design,easy to fabricate,not soldered, has minimal chances of breakage,prevents slippage of E-chain,is non-compliant. 500

References 1. ElifGündüz. A.G. Crismani,H.P.Bantleon,Klaus D.hnigl,and Bjorn U. Zachrisson(2003) An Improved Transpalatal Bar Design.Part II.Clinical Upper Molar Derotation-Case Report.The Angle Orthodontist:June 2003,Vol. 73,No. 3,pp.244-248. 2.Zablocki HL, McNamara JA Jr,Franchi L, Baccetti T.Effect of the transpalatal arch during extraction treatment.am J OrthodDentofacialOrthop.2008 Jun;133(6):852-60.doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.031. 501