Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office

Similar documents
SOP-QA-30 V Scope

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE

Standard Operating Procedure CPFT/SOP003 Serious Breach of Protocol or GCP in CTIMPs

MHRA Pharmacovigilance Inspections: Prepare and Manage for Success

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE SOP 720 RISK ASSESSMENT OF TRIALS SPONSORED. BY THE NNUH and UEA

Annual Progress and Safety Reporting SOP for HEY-sponsored CTIMPs

NEWCASTLE CLINICAL TRIALS UNIT STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

MHRA Pharmacovigilance System Master File (PSMF) Inspection Findings

Standard Operating Procedure Research Governance

Care and Social Services Inspectorate Wales

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

Quality, Safety and Sourcing in Unlicensed Medicines

Standard Operating Procedure. Selection of studies performed in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice for audit purposes

Dorset Health and Wellbeing Board

AGREEMENT ON COMMON PRINCIPLES AND RULES OF CIRCULATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS WITHIN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION. (Moscow, 23 December 2014)

DE-DESIGNATION OF YELLOW FEVER VACCINATION CENTRES

PATIENT GROUP DIRECTION PROCEDURE

Research & Development. J H Pacynko and J Illingworth. Research, pharmacy and R&D staff

Trust Policy 218 Ionising Radiation Safety Policy

Informed Consent Procedures and Writing Informed Consent Forms

GLP Update and Hot Topics

UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER, UNIVERSITY OF LOUGHBOROUGH & UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST JOINT RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT OFFICE

(Legislative acts) REGULATIONS

1.5 Ensure the aims and outcomes of the service are understood and shared by all stakeholders.

National Drug and Alcohol Treatment Waiting Times

The Nutrition (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2018

Developing a Research Protocol/Proposal

TERMS AND CONDITIONS NATIONAL GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE (GLP) COMPLIANCE MONITORING AUTHORITY

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN USE (CHMP)

UKAS Guidance on the Application of ISO/IEC Dealing with Expressions of Opinions and Interpretations

Update regarding PSUR and RMP for herbal and homeopathical medicinal products

Hearing aid dispenser approval process review Introduction Hearing aid dispenser data transfer... 6

AIFA UNICRI FDA TRAINING COURSE. on GCP Inspectorates and GCP Inspections

Announcement regarding the publication of the results of clinical trials in accordance with Section 42b of the Medicines Act (AMG)

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 7 September 2009 (OR. en) 11261/09 Interinstitutional File: 2008/0002 (COD) DENLEG 51 CODEC 893

Safeguarding Children and Young People Policy

ATMPs & EU GMP Update. Bryan J Wright July 2017

Standard Operating Procedure: Early Intervention in Psychosis Access Times

XOSERVE LIMITED SERVICES SCHEDULE FOR THE PROVISION OF NON-CODE USER PAYS SERVICES (REFERENCE NUMBER XNCUP(SS)06) DATED 20 INTRODUCTION

PGD CHECKLIST FOR DIRECTORATE CLINICAL GOVERNANCE COMMITTEES

EU safeguards contribution to the global nuclear non-proliferation regime. Safeguards implementation in the European Union

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

1. Comply with the NCI CIRB s requirements and directives;

RADIATION SAFETY POLICY. Controlled Document Number: Version Number: 3 Controlled Document Sponsor: Controlled Document Lead: Approved By:

Approval of Dosimetry Services in Ireland Guidelines for Applicants

DIRECTIVES. (Text with EEA relevance)

Managing the risks of clinical trials: the MRC/MHRA approach

in the ICH Regions Table of Content Annexes to Guideline and 3. Why is Q4B necessary? Q4B Annexes? for Human Use

Personal information, for purposes of this Policy, includes any information which relates to an identified or an identifiable person.

DRAFT COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

National Drug and Alcohol Treatment Waiting Times Report

Access to clinical trial information and the stockpiling of Tamiflu. Department of Health

Monday, 22 January 2018 HFEA, 10 Spring Gardens, London SW1A 2BU

LEAF Marque Assurance Programme

l Chief Investigator/R & D Committee member

National Drug and Alcohol Treatment Waiting Times

PRIMARY CARE CO-COMMISSIONING COMMITTEE 18 March 2016

15. Procuring, processing and transporting gametes and

Good Laboratory Practice. EU-Serbia screening meeting Brussels, 19 June 2014

CARIBX (UK) LIMITED. Environmental, Health and Safety Management System. Revision: 00 APRIL 2011

GOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 22 February 2017 Agenda Item 3.4

Z E N I T H M E D I C A L P R O V I D E R N E T W O R K P O L I C Y Title: Provider Appeal of Network Exclusion Policy

Survey results - Analysis of higher tier studies submitted without testing proposals

Practical guidance for applicants on the submission of applications on food additives, food enzymes and food flavourings

THE RESPONSIBLE PHARMACIST REGULATIONS

Policy and Procedure for the Development, Approval and Implementation of Patient Group Directions in NHS Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group

C 178/2 Official Journal of the European Union

Clinical Trials in Third Countries

No Smoking Policy. No Smoking Policy Page: Page 1 of 13. Author: Strategic HR Manager Version: 1.3. Date of Approval: 7 October 2015 Status: Final

Response to: Concept paper of 9 February 2011 submitted for public consultation by the European Commission on the

This is an unofficial English translation of the Royal Decree 1344/2007 revised by the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices

CONSTITUTION SOUTHAMPTON CHILDREN & YOUNG PEOPLE S TRUST PARTNERSHIP

PIC/S GUIDANCE ON CLASSIFICATION OF GMP DEFICIENCIES

Research Licence Renewal Inspection Report

Specialist List in Special Care Dentistry

National Guardian Freedom to Speak Up. CQC inspections. Information for Freedom to Speak Up Guardians

2008 Public Status Report on the Implementation of the European Risk Management Strategy. Executive Summary

POLICY ANALYST JOB DESCRIPTION

RECOMMENDATION ADOPTED BY THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COMMITTEE FOR THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL AT ITS FIRST MEETING

Darwin Marine Supply Base HSEQ Quality Management Plan

In 2013, Her Majesty s Inspectorate of Constabularies published Stop and Search Powers: Are the police using them effectively and fairly?

Independent Assurance Statement by Bureau Veritas

Memorandum of Understanding between the Care Quality Commission and the General Dental Council

Creating a Smoke Free Workplace Policy

EFSA PRE-SUBMISSION GUIDANCE FOR APPLICANTS INTENDING TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS FOR AUTHORISATION OF HEALTH CLAIMS MADE ON FOODS

EPF s response to the European Commission s public consultation on the "Summary of Clinical Trial Results for Laypersons"

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority 10 Spring Gardens London SW1A 2BU t e w

Market surveillance of medical devices

HERBAL MEDICINES: Product Licence To Traditional Herbal Registration in the UK. Presented by: Mariam Aslam

Policy: S5 Smoke Free Policy

Clinical Trial Protocol

Memorandum of Understanding

Report to: Trust Board Agenda item: 13. Date of Meeting: 8 June 2011

How Ofsted regulate childcare

Decentralised Procedure. Public Assessment Report. Pramipexol-neuraxpharm 0,26 / 0,52 / 1,05 / 1,57 / 2,1 / 2,62 / 3,15 mg Retardtabletten

CHAPTER 3. Union Referral Procedures MAY 2014

Decentralised Procedure. Public Assessment Report. ALGOTRA 37.5 mg/325 mg überzogene Tabletten Tramadol/Paracetamol DE/H/3688/001/DC

Environmental, Health and Safety

Transcription:

Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) Research and Development Office Title of SOP: GCP Inspection Procedures (MHRA) SOP Number: 15 Version Number: 2.0 Supercedes: 1.0 Effective date: August 2013 Review date: August 2015 Author: Approved by: Alison Murphy, Research Manager Endorsed by Paul Carlin Dr David Hill Signed: Date: 01 August 2013

Version History: Version No. Date Author Reason for Change 1.0 Sept 2007 Katrina Hughes N/A 2.0 Aug 2011 Alison Murphy Revised to reflect new format for SOPs Document Number: SOP/RAD/SEHSCT/ 015 Page 2 of 7

Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. Objective 3. Scope 4. Process 4.1 MHRA GCP Inspection in Non-Commercial Organisations 4.2 Pre-inspection activities for routine inspections 4.3 The Inspection 4.4 Post-inspection MHRA Report to the Organisation 5. Regulations, Guidelines, references, SOP Links etc 6. Appendices Document Number: SOP/RAD/SEHSCT/ 015 Page 3 of 7

1. INTRODUCTION The MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulation Agency) is an executive agency of the Department of Health. This body is currently executing a programme of Inspections into the conduct of Clinical Trials of Medicinal Products. The inspections are to measure compliance with the set of internationally legally recognised Principles for conducting Clinical Trials Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP Principles) and to ensure compliance with the EU Clinical Trials Directive (2001/20/EC) which came into force on 1 May 2004 and has been transposed into UK law by the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004, and the Medicines for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Amendment Regulations 2006 (the Amendment Regulations) which were laid in Parliament on 20 July 2006 and came into force on 29 August 2006. Meaning those NHS organisations sponsoring and hosting CTIMPs must ensure that systems are in place so that CTIMPs can be managed and conducted in accordance with both the Research Governance Framework (2005) and the Clinical Trials Regulations. 2. OBJECTIVE This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) seeks to explain the procedure for facilitating an inspection by the MHRA. 3. SCOPE This Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) applies to all Clinical Trials of an Investigational Medicinal Product (CTIMPs) where the South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust (SEHSCT) is acting as the sponsor, co-sponsor or hosting site. 4. PROCESS 4.1 MHRA GCP Inspection in Non-Commercial Organisations One of the requirements of the EU Clinical Trials Directive is that Member States set up inspection systems to ensure compliance with the Clinical Trials regulations. Therefore, the MHRA has established a GCP Inspectorate to conduct GCP inspections, one of a range of inspections that are carried out by the MHRA. The UK legislation defines the responsibilities of the Sponsor and the Investigator site. NHS organisations conducting clinical trials may be subject to inspection of either of these responsibilities. 4.1.1 Sponsor Inspection Where the organisation is named as the sponsor or co-sponsor of the CTIMP, the MHRA may conduct a sponsor inspection. The sponsor has responsibility for the initiation, management and financing (or arranging the financing) of the trial. The Sponsor is required to satisfy the MHRA that the study meets the relevant standards Document Number: SOP/RAD/SEHSCT/ 015 Page 4 of 7

and to ensure that arrangements are put and kept in place for management, monitoring and reporting. An MHRA inspection will include scrutiny of Trust-wide systems to confirm that the organisation has fulfilled its sponsor responsibilities. 4.1.2 Investigator Site Inspection Where the organisation is hosting an investigational site, (with an external sponsor) the MHRA may conduct an investigator site inspection. This is an inspection of the conduct of the trial by the investigator and of the role of the sponsor in overseeing the trial. Any NHS organisation systems that are used to conduct the trial will be scrutinised to ensure that they are fit for purpose. 4.2 Pre-inspection Activities for Routine Inspections The MHRA will issue a letter of notification 2-3 months in advance to the Research and Development Department. The organisation is expected to produce, within 28 days, a Pre-inspection Dossier that will contain: Organisation details Contact name to manage logistics Details of clinical trials of medicinal products Index of standard Operating Procedures and processes The inspector will then review the dossier and agree inspection dates and the agenda with the organisation. Additional updated details may be requested nearer the date of the inspection. The MHRA will provide a list of trials to be looked at in specific detail. 4.3 The Inspection There will be an opening meeting to confirm the purpose of inspection, provide introductions and methodology. The inspection will be conducted generally in accordance with a predetermined plan, though this may be revised based upon inspection outcomes. The inspection will include a combination of staff interviews, document review and facility visits. The MHRA are likely to use study-specific examples to demonstrate the system. The MHRA will provide feedback of general findings at a closing meeting. The inspection will be characterised by: Flexibility on both side Open dialogue from the beginning Ongoing verbal feedback throughout the inspection Opportunity to demonstrate how your systems meet the legislation Review of action plans already in place to address known areas of noncompliance 4.3.1 Activities of Interest The MHRA will be interested in processes relating to: Document Number: SOP/RAD/SEHSCT/ 015 Page 5 of 7

Regulatory submissions Laboratories Investigational medicinal product management Contract Management Project Management Trial-file management for selected clinical trial(s) Quality Assurance Training Computer systems Monitoring Pharmacovigilance Medical Advisors Data management Statistical Analysis Report writing Archives Investigational sites 4.3.2 Types of Findings The inspection report will specify the criteria used to categories findings. However, in previous inspections, the MHRA have used the following criteria: Critical; Major; or Other. A Critical finding was defined as one where: Evidence exists that the safety, well being or confidentially of trial subjects has been (or has significant potential to be) jeopardised, and/or Serious doubt exists relating to the accuracy or credibility of trial data. A Major finding was a non-critical finding that: Reveals a significant and unjustified departure from the UK regulations Consists of a number of minor departures from the UK regulations or other relevant established guidance, suggesting a systematic quality assurance failure Reveals a failure to comply with relevant legislative requirements. An Other finding was any other inspection finding, including observations and recommendations. The implications are: Critical findings require an agreed remediation plan to be put in place and reinspection can occur. Major findings must be addressed but the organisation suggests to the MHRA how this is achieved. Other findings do require remedy where this is possible, and preventative actions should always be considered. Responsible to other findings will be requested in the inspection report. Observations and recommendations do Document Number: SOP/RAD/SEHSCT/ 015 Page 6 of 7

not require written response unless requested by the Inspector in the inspection report. 4.4 Post-inspection MHRA Report to the Organisation A report is issued with 30 working days of the end of inspection. The MHRA will expect responses to be received within 30 calendar days of despatch. There will be an opportunity for questions and clarification, if required. The MHRA will issue a summary letter and an inspection certificate. 5. REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, REFERENCES, SOP LINKS etc. NHS Research and Development Forum Document How to prepare for an inspection for Good Clinical Practice by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA): a guide for NHS organisations that sponsor or host clinical trials of medicinal products. Version 2, 31 October 2006. 6. APPENDICES None Document Number: SOP/RAD/SEHSCT/ 015 Page 7 of 7