RMO VISUAL NORMS. CASE: CHINESE SAMPLE Dr. TRAINING F (CH) Chinese AGE: 12.4 X: 09/30/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH

Similar documents
CASE: EXTRACTION Dr. TRAINING M (CA) Caucasian AGE: 8.6 VISUAL NORMS RMO X: 02/06/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2003

CASE: HISPANIC SAMPLE Dr. TRAINING F (LA) Latin AGE: 10.5 VISUAL NORMS RMO X: 06/23/ R: 02/21/2003 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2003

CASE: H, M DRS. D/B F (CA) Caucasian AGE: 8.5 SKEL: 9.0 RMO VISUAL NORMS X: 07/12/ R: 04/26/2011 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2011

RMO Data Services FOREWORD

CASE: H, Z DRS. D/B M (CA) Caucasian AGE: 10.7 SKEL: 12.2 RMO VISUAL NORMS X: 12/10/ R: 04/26/2011 MISSING PERMANENT TEETH RMO 2011

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Treatment of Angle Class III. Department of Paedodontics and Orthodontics Dr. habil. Melinda Madléna associate professor

Changes in longitudinal craniofacial growth in subjects with normal occlusions using the Ricketts analysis

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC BOARD

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

Arrangement of the artificial teeth:

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

Angle Class I malocclusion with anterior open bite treated with extraction of permanent teeth

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

Early Mixed Dentition Period

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

Case Report n 2. Patient. Age: ANB 8 OJ 4.5 OB 5.5

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

PATERN OF CEPHALOMETRIC ANALISYS AND DENTAL PROFILE IN A GIRL WITH PRADER-WILLI SINDROME

ISW for the treatment of moderate crowding dentition with unilateral second molar impaction

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

Orthodontic Treatment Using The Dental VTO And MBT System

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

The practice of orthodontics is faced with new

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

EUROPEAN BOARD OF ORTHODONTISTS APPENDIX 1 CASE PRESENTATION 2005

Comparison of Skeletal Changes between Female Adolescents and Adults with Hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 Malocclusion after Orthodontic Treatment

Regarding morphological differences of the maxillary anterior teeth of monozygotic twin sisters

Dr Robert Drummond. BChD, DipOdont Ortho, MChD(Ortho), FDC(SA) Ortho. Canad Inn Polo Park Winnipeg 2015

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

Maxillary Expansion and Protraction in Correction of Midface Retrusion in a Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patient

Effect of Chronic Nasal Airway Obstruction on Maxillary Arch Form in Monozygotic Twins: A Case Report

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

ACTIVATOR: SIMPLE YET EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCE FOR SKELETAL CLASS II CORRECTION: CASE REPORT... ABSTRACT:...

Racial Variations in Cephalometric Analysis between Whites and Kuwaitis

Holy Nexus of Variable Wire Cross-section: New Vistas in Begg s Technique

An Innovative Treatment Approach with Atypical Orthodontic Extraction Pattern in Bimaxillary Protrusion Case

Ah-Young Lee and Young Ho Kim. 1. Introduction

MEDICAL ASSISTANCE BULLETIN COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE

TWO PHASE FOR A BETTER FACE!! TWIN BLOCK AND HEADGEAR FOLLOWED BY FIXED THERAPY FOR CLASS II CORRECTION

Angle Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary dental protrusion and missing mandibular first molars*

Orthognathic treatment of facial asymmetry due to temporomandibular joint ankylosis

instruction. The principal investigator traced and measured all cephalograms over an illuminated view box using the standard technique described Tweed

Jefferson Cephalometric Analysis--Face and Health Focused

Sample Case #1. Disclaimer

Concepts of occlusion Balanced occlusion. Monoplane occlusion. Lingualized occlusion. Figure (10-1)

Case Report. profile relaxed relaxed smiling. How would you treat this malocclusion?

The Tip-Edge appliance and

2008 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. Correction of Asymmetry with a Mandibular Propulsion Appliance

A Cephalometric Comparison of Twin Block and Bionator Appliances in Treatment of Class II Malocclusion

Treatment of Class II non-extraction using the Bioprogressive method

Treatment of a Patient with Class I Malocclusion and Severe Tooth Crowding Using Invisalign and Fixed Appliances

Interdisciplinary Treatment of an Adult Patient Using an Adjunctive Orthodontic Approach. Case Report

Treatment of Long face / Open bite

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

Cephalometric Findings in a Normal Nigerian. Population Sample and Adult Nigerians with Unrepaired Clefts

Treatment of a severe class II division 1 malocclusion with twin-block appliance

Class II malocclusions are observed commonly in

MBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D

Skeletal And DentoalveolarChanges Seen In Class II Div 1 Mal- Occlusion Cases Treated With Twin Block Appliance- A Cephalometric Study

Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients

Incisal and Soft Tissue Effects of Maxillary Premolar Extraction in Class II Treatment

Morphology of an Anatomic Crown. By: Assistant Professor Dr. Baydaa Ali Al - Rawi

Maxillary Growth Control with High Pull Headgear- A Case Report

KJLO. A Sequential Approach for an Asymmetric Extraction Case in. Lingual Orthodontics. Case Report INTRODUCTION DIAGNOSIS

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

The effect of tooth agenesis on dentofacial structures

Nonextraction Treatment of Upper Canine Premolar Transposition in an Adult Patient

Research & Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion with Class I Molars Due to Blocked In Lower Second Premolars

Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.

Reliability of A and B point for cephalometric analysis

Surgical-Orthodontic Treatment of Gummy Smile with Vertical Maxillary Excess

#45 Ortho-Tain, Inc PREVENTIVE ERUPTION GUIDANCE -- PREVENTIVE OCCLUSAL DEVELOPMENT

Lever-arm and Mini-implant System for Anterior Torque Control during Retraction in Lingual Orthodontic Treatment

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector


mandibular deficiency and maxillary and mandibular crowding: follow-up evaluation

Orthognathic surgical norms for a sample of Saudi adults: Hard tissue measurements

Title bimaxillary protrusion : A case rep. Shigenaga, Naoko; Haraguchi, Seiji; Yamashiro, Takashi.

Adult Class lll Treatment Using a J-Hook Headgear to the Mandibular Arch

Introduction Subjects and methods

Cephalometric Analysis for Diagnosis and Treatment of Orthodontic Patients

Transcription:

O C RMO CASE: CHINESE SAMPLE Dr. TRAINING F (CH) Chinese AGE:. X: // - R: // MISSING PERMANENT TEETH VISUAL NORMS RMO R L

RMO Diagnostic Services RMO, Inc. ()- Post Office Box ()- Canoga Park, CA - CHINESE SAMPLE RMO Case Number: X-Ray date: // Age:. Reference: C C D Dr. Training RMO Run date: // Birthdate: // Sex: Female C C D - O R T H O D O N T I C C O N D I T I O N S C C D - S K E L E T A L C O N D I T I O N S LATERAL BEFORE TREATMENT LATERAL BEFORE TREATMENT FACTOR MEASURED CLINICAL CLINICAL FACTOR MEASURED CLINICAL CLINICAL VALUE NORM DEVIATIONS VALUE NORM DEVIATIONS # - Appears on tracing FROM NORM # - Appears on tracing FROM NORM ======================= DENTAL RELATIONS ======================= ====================== SKELETAL RELATIONS ====================== Molar Relation -. mm -. mm. # Convexity. mm. mm -. Canine Relation -. mm -. mm. # Lower Facial Height. dg. dg. Incisor Overjet. mm. mm. Present Patient Height. in. in Incisor Overbite. mm. mm -. Posterior face height. mm Mand Incisor Extrusion. mm. mm. Anterior face height. mm # Interincisal Angle. dg. dg -. * Posterior/Anterior ratio. % Saddle Angle. dg. dg. * ====================== DENTAL TO SKELETON ====================== Condylion-A point. mm. mm -. Condylion-Gnathion. mm. mm -. # A Molar Position to PTV. mm. mm. Max-Mand Differential. mm. mm. # B to A-Po Plane. mm. mm. ** Menton-ANS. mm. mm. A to A-Po Plane. mm. mm. ** # B Inclination to A-Po. dg. dg. * ======================== JAW TO CRANIUM ======================== A Inclination to A-Po. dg. dg. * Occlusal Plane to Xi. mm -. mm. # Facial Depth. dg. dg -. Inclination of Occl Plane. dg. dg -. # Facial Axis. dg. dg -. B Inclination to FH. dg. dg -. ** # Maxillary Depth. dg. dg -. Maxillary Height. dg. dg. =========================== ESTHETICS ========================== Palatal Plane to FH. dg -. dg. # Mandibular Plane to FH. dg. dg. Lower Lip to Esthetic Plane. mm. mm. * Ba-N-A. dg. dg. * Upper Lip Length. mm. mm. * S-N-A. dg. dg -. Lip Embrasure to Occl Plane -. mm -. mm -. S-N-B. dg. dg -. NasoLabial Angle. dg. dg -. *** A-N-B Difference. dg. dg. Total Facial Height. dg. dg. ===================== NASOPHARYNGEAL AIRWAY ==================== ====================== INTERNAL STRUCTURE ====================== N-S-Ba. dg. dg. Ba-S-PNS. dg. dg -. ** Cranial Deflection. dg. dg. Airway Percent. %. % -. Cranial Length Anterior. mm. mm. Linder-Aronson AD. mm. mm -. Ramus Height (CF-Go). mm. mm. Linder-Aronson AD. mm. mm -. Ramus Xi Position. dg. dg -. Distance PTV to Adenoid. mm. mm -. Porion Location (Por to PTV) -. mm -. mm. # Mandibular Arc. dg. dg. Corpus Length. mm. mm. Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

RMO Diagnostic Services RMO, Inc. ()- Post Office Box ()- Canoga Park, CA - CHINESE SAMPLE RMO Case Number: X-Ray date: // Age:. Reference: I N F O Dr. Training RMO Run date: // Birthdate: // Sex: Female P A T I E N T I N F O R M A T I O N S I G N I F I C A N T C O N S I D E R A T I O N S ============================= NAME ============================= CONDITION CCD FACTORS Patient name: CHINESE SAMPLE ========================== HORIZONTAL ========================== Doctor name: TRAINING Age:. Bimaxillary Protrusion, X-Ray date: // RMO Case Number: RMO Run date: // ==================== MISSING PERMANENT TEETH =================== =========================== VERTICAL =========================== R --------+-------- L ======================= HEIGHT PREDICTION ====================== ========================== TRANSVERSE ========================== Assumed skeletal age:. Current height:. inches Amount of adult growth achieved:. % Expected adult height:. inches ======================== AIRWAY ANALYSIS ======================= If the patient is clinically diagnosed =========================== SYMMETRY =========================== as a mouthbreather, observed mouthbreathing is probably not caused by adenoid blockage of the airway. ======================== BOLTON ANALYSIS ======================= ==================== SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS ==================== Not Available - Upper and lower arch not analyzed =========================== COMMENTS =========================== Lat lt 's used for measurement No analysis of frontal x-ray. Upper and lower arch expansion decisions based on available data only. Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

CASE: CHINESE SAMPLE Dr. TRAINING F (CH) Chinese AGE:. X: // - R: // MISSING PERMANENT TEETH TRACING BEFORE TREATMENT RMO R L / / / / / / / / / / / MEASURED VALUE/NORM R L SIGNIFICANT CONSIDERATIONS CONDITION REASON Bimaxillary Protrusion Adenoid blockage of the airway? Probably not SHORTAGE. MM LEEWAY. MM FACIAL PATTERN: MESOFACIAL # FACTORS MEASURED VALUE NORM CLINICAL DEVIATION Interincisal Angle. dg. dg -. * Convexity. mm. mm -. Lower Facial Height. dg. dg. A Molar Position to PTV. mm. mm. B to A-Po Plane. mm. mm. ** B Inclination to A-Po. dg. dg. * Facial Depth. dg. dg -. Facial Axis. dg. dg -. Maxillary Depth. dg. dg -. Mandibular Plane to FH. dg. dg. Mandibular Arc. dg. dg. O C RMO

RMO Diagnostic Services RMO, Inc. ()- Post Office Box ()- Canoga Park, CA - CHINESE SAMPLE RMO Case Number: X-Ray date: // Age:. Reference: G T E Dr. Training RMO Run date: // Birthdate: // Sex: Female ========== G U I D E T O A L T E R N A T I V E T R E A T M E N T P L A N N I N G ========== Probability of Lower Third Molar Facial Pattern. C.D. (based on space available) Vertical Description MESOFACIAL Impaction Eruption Eruption Questionable Functional Auxiliary Appliances Function Headgear NOT INDICATED.%.%.% Activator NEUTRAL Palate Separation N/A - No Arch and Frontal data Convexity Objective Reduce. mm Lower Arch Length Discrepancy (original arch). mm Shortage Including useable leeway (E) space Required Tooth Effect on Resulting * * * L O W E R A R C H * * * Movement Arch Length Discrepancy --------------------------------------------------------- Lt:. mm Bwd. Lower Incisor to Ideal Rt:. mm Bwd.. mm Decrease. mm Shortage Buccal Expansion to Ideal Arch Form. mm Increase. mm Shortage Incisors & Convexity to Cephalometric Limit. mm Fwd.. mm Increase. mm Shortage Lower Molar Distal Movement. mm. mm Increase. mm Shortage * * * U P P E R A R C H * * * Movement of First Molar (non-ext.) Required for Class I. mm Mesial Resulting Expected Space for nd & rd Molars at Maturity (non-ext.). mm Required Space for nd Molars. mm to. mm Required Space for nd & rd Molars. mm to. mm *** Indicated Treatment using Dr's Personalized Decision Program *** Upper Arch EXTRACTION Lower Arch EXTRACTION Lower Incisor Backward. mm Buccal Expansion Gain. mm Lower Molar Movement Forward. mm Teeth Sizes: L L L L L L R R R R R R TOTAL SUM OF INCISOR NORM Lower Arch :.............. MM. Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

RMO Diagnostic Services RMO, Inc. ()- Post Office Box ()- Canoga Park, CA - CHINESE SAMPLE RMO Case Number: X-Ray date: // Age:. Reference: W R E Dr. Training RMO Run date: // Birthdate: // Sex: Female W O R K U P R A T I O N A L E ====================== ORIGINAL CONDITION ====================== ================ REASONS FOR LOWER ARCH DECISION =============== Facial pattern:. CD - Mesofacial Mandibular Arch Length Analysis Lower arch form: Ovoid. Initial Conditions A. Original Arch Length. mm shortage Missing permanent teeth: R --------+-------- L B. Useable Leeway Space. mm C. Total Initial Discrepancy(A+B). mm shortage Lower arch length discrepancy (ALD). mm SHORTAGE. Maximum Permissible Arch Length Leeway space. mm --- Increase(Within Doctor Limits) Maximum use of leeway space. mm Due To: Total arch length discrepancy. mm SHORTAGE D. Lower Incisor Repositioning. mm decrease E. Buccal Expansion. mm ======================= COMPUTER DECISION ====================== F. Lower Molar Distal Movement. mm increase based on Dr. Training's individualized standards G. Total Possible Increase (D+E+F). mm decrease UPPER ARCH: EXTRACTION. Resultant Arch Length Discrepancy. mm shortage Considering All Possible Arch Convexity change NONE Length Increases (C+G). Resultant Computer Decision Extraction LOWER ARCH: EXTRACTION. Work-Up Presented Is EXTRACTION Lower incisor BACKWARD. mm Extracted teeth Buccal Expansion NONE ================ REASONS FOR UPPER ARCH DECISION =============== R --------+-------- L Lower molar FORWARD. mm. Convexity change. mm ===================== AUXILIARY APPLIANCES =====================. Upper incisor tip movement for. mm backward overbite/overjet ideal to lower Activator: NEUTRAL. First molar movement required. mm forward Palate separation: N/A - No Arch and Frontal data Headgear: NOT INDICATED. First molar movement clinical limit. mm backward. Work-Up Presented Is EXTRACTION ======================== POST TREATMENT ======================== =========================== COMMENTS =========================== Pentamorphic arch form: Ovoid Arch length relapse:. mm Lat lt 's used for measurement Lower third molar probabilities (based on space available) Impaction: % Marginal: % Functional: % Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

CHINESE SAMPLE F. SEQUENCES WORKSHEET // EXTRACTION RMO U P P E R A R C H ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION MONTHS NOTES PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS EXTRACT INTRUDE RETRACT CLOSE SPACE -- RETRACT INCISORS ALIGN/LEVEL BUCCAL SEGS IDEAL ARCH L O W E R A R C H ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION MONTHS NOTES PROGRESS PROGRESS EXTRACT RETRACT EXTRUDE RETRACT INCISORS PROGRESS INTRUDE ADVANCE ALIGN/LEVEL BUCCAL SEGS CLOSE SPACE -- O C RMO

RMO SEQUENCES WORKSHEET CHINESE SAMPLE F. // EXTRACTION U P P E R A R C H ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION MONTHS NOTES L O W E R A R C H ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION MONTHS NOTES IDEAL ARCH FINAL ARCH ALIGN/LEVEL BUCCAL SEGS CLOSE SPACE -- IDEAL ARCH FINAL ARCH POST TX POST TX O RMO C

CHINESE SAMPLE F. // EXTRACT R EXTRACTION TREATMENT DESIGN L PT. A MOVEMENT MAXILLARY CHANGE NONE. MM CHANGE IN MAXILLARY TEETH RMO UPPER MOLAR CHANGE CHANGE IN MANDIBULAR TEETH LOWER INCISOR LOWER MOLAR BWD(LT). FWD. MM MM WORKUP PRESENTED Upper arch: EXTRACTION Lower arch: EXTRACTION MISSING PERMANENT TEETH MANDIBULAR GROWTH R L R --------+-------- L COMMENTS Lat lt 's used for measurement ORIGINAL GROWTH W/O TREATMENT TREATMENT OBJECTIVE O C RMO

RMO Diagnostic Services RMO, Inc. ()- Post Office Box ()- Canoga Park, CA - CHINESE SAMPLE RMO Case Number: X-Ray date: // Age:. Reference: S A Dr. Training RMO Run date: // Birthdate: // Sex: Female S T E I N E R A N A L Y S I S ======================= BEFORE TREATMENT ======================= Factor Measured Clinical Clinical Value Norm Deviations From Norm SNA. dg. dg -. SNB. dg. dg -. ANB. dg. dg. SND. dg. dg -. A to NA. mm. mm. * A to NA. dg. dg. * B to NB. mm. mm. ** B to NB. dg. dg. * A to B. dg. dg -. ** OCC.PL/SN. dg. dg. * Prepared for the doctor and subject to the terms and conditions appearing on our current orderform

O C RMO CHINESE SAMPLE F. // STEINER ANALYSIS RMO. mm. mm. mm. mm -. mm AP TO : WITS :. MM -. MM